Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie最新文献

The COVID-19 pandemic caused more adolescents with a pathological narcissistic personality to seek clinical as well as psychotherapeutic treatment due to suicidal crises, breakdown of social functioning and inability to continue school attendance. Recent study results show that youth with personality disorders (pd) had more trouble returning to school and to everyday life following pandemic related closures of schools. In a sample of adolescent patients with pd who were treated with transference focused psychotherapy (TFP-A) in a day-clinic programsignificantlymore juveniles remained absent fromschool during the pandemic then pre-pandemic. Only 42 % of the adolescents from the pandemic-group returned to school as a result of the treatment in comparison to 53%of the juvenile patients who returned to school after being treated before the pandemic. This might be explained by the specific effect the pandemic had on adolescents with narcissistic pd and their problem with being treated. Unfortunately, there is still hesitance in diagnosing and investigating narcissistic personality pathology in adolescence despite the knowledge that the early diagnosis and specified treatment could prevent unfavorable pathways and chronification of their severe problems. Changes in the conceptualization of pd in ICD-11 and DSM-5 enable a differentiated diagnosis beginning in late childhood. Furthermore, there are specialized manualized treatment approaches for adolescents with pd. This paper aims at illustrating the specific characteristics of narcissistic pd in youth as well as describing the symptom aggravation following the pandemic. It also points out the possibilities of a modified specialized treatment approach based on transference focused psychotherapy. Further research is needed to improve diagnostic and therapeutic modifications for juveniles with pd.

The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of corona-specific variables and post-traumatic stress symptoms associated with the COVID-19-pandemic, considering sociodemographic data and health-related quality of life, on the affective well-being of preschool children and to identify predictors of positive and negative affect. A secondary analysis of third-party assessment data by parents of three- to six-year-old preschool children from the Tyrolean COVID-19 Children's Study at two measurement time points (123 records at t₁ in summer 2020; 467 records at t₂ in winter 2020/21) was conducted. To answer the research question hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed.The largest part of the variance explanation of affective well-being was explained by health-related quality of life: while self-esteem and psychological well-being were measurement-time-independent, effects of physical well-being, preschool, family, and friends were only significant in winter. Coronaspecific variables caused additional variance explanation due to subjective threat experience in winter; post-traumatic stress symptoms had an effect at both measurement-times. In times of crisis children's self-esteem, psychological well-being, and post-traumatic stress symptoms should be considered.Measurement-time-dependent results suggest that the pandemic course plays a decisive role regarding the influence on children's affective well-being. Everyday life and routines must be redefined accordingly and communicated to the children.

Social restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on the mental health of youth. We analyzed a sample of 274 adolescents and young adults that participated in an online survey. We used the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI 18) and the Perceived Stress Scale to assess mental health status. Furthermore, we assessed the frequency and intensity of social media use in all participants. More than 50 % of the adolescents and young adults reported clinically relevant scores for somatization, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress. Females had significantly higher mental health burdens than males. Although adolescents used social media more frequently and intensely than young adults, the results showed no correlation with psychopathology. Young adults had significantly higher scores compared to adolescents in somatization, depression, and perceived stress the more time they spent on social media. Our results emphasise that frequency and intensity of social media use alone were not associated with worsemental health.However, the adverse effects of socialmedia use have to be considered carefully.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, provision of care in child and adolescent psychiatry was a challenge: Emergency presentations as well as psychiatric problems in children and adolescents increased, while at the same time capacity of inpatient treatment was reduced due to closed inpatient departments and staff shortage. Altogether quarantine, social distancing, testing and hygenic measures complicated daily life as well as inpatient treatment. This article describes the change in numbers of inpatient emergency admissions and prevalent mental health diagnoseses, as well as the role of hometreatment during Covid-19 pandemic. It can be demonstrated that the hometreatment team was able to operate without reduction of treatment capacities throughout the Covid-19 pandemic as long as they took care that basic hygienic measures were in place, Not one single case of Covid-19 infection was transmitted. Hometreatment proved to be an effective treatment alternative for children and adolescents with mental health problems and their families during Covid-19.

Psychosocial stressors and resources present in the early life of a child play a crucial part in determining outcomes later in life. Preventive early childhood intervention services aim to reduce negative and increase positive outcomes. Home-visiting programs are an example for preventive services that are common in many countries.The present study focusses on a wide spread home-visiting program in Germany and has three main objectives: First, to characterize the professionals that conduct and the families who participate in the program. Second, to study relations between a broad range of resources and stressors. Third, to analyse potential outcome variables for future efficacy studies on early childhood intervention services. The goal is to recruit 130 professionals and 500 families from 20 cities and municipalities in Germany. For families with two caregivers, both are invited to participate. Questionnaire topics for professionals and families include a range of stressors and resources, need for support, and the work focus of the professionals. Statistical analyses will mainly be descriptive, exploring the complex interplay of stressors and resources in vulnerable families.These results will not only provide insights into how the program is currently conducted and whom it serves, but might also help to further accelerate the program and the training of professionals.