Pub Date : 2022-03-09DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2022.2049269
Linda Dam, Anne-Marie B. Basaran, Carolyn A. Lin, Dana Rogers
ABSTRACT This study explores how individuals react to COVID-19 prevention measures in relation to their national cultural values and health belief factors. Specifically, guided by the most relevant Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and the health belief model (HBM), this study tested a conceptual framework through conducting a survey of the U.S. adult population. The study results did not support Hofstede’s classification of the U.S. to be among the most individualistic culture with the lowest level of uncertainty avoidance in the world. Demographic factors such as ethnicity, gender, age, and education were found to be significantly related to collectivistic tendency and/or uncertainty avoidance. Findings also demonstrated that the tendency for collectivism and uncertainty avoidance were both relevant to people’s intention to adopt COVID-19 prevention measures. Results of testing the HBM variables revealed that perceived barriers, perceived self-efficacy, and cues to action were significantly related to preventive behavioral intentions. This study highlights the importance of considering subculture factors when promoting COVID-19 preventive measures in a multicultural society.
{"title":"Exploring the influence of cultural and health beliefs on intentions to adopt COVID-19 prevention measures","authors":"Linda Dam, Anne-Marie B. Basaran, Carolyn A. Lin, Dana Rogers","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2022.2049269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2022.2049269","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores how individuals react to COVID-19 prevention measures in relation to their national cultural values and health belief factors. Specifically, guided by the most relevant Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and the health belief model (HBM), this study tested a conceptual framework through conducting a survey of the U.S. adult population. The study results did not support Hofstede’s classification of the U.S. to be among the most individualistic culture with the lowest level of uncertainty avoidance in the world. Demographic factors such as ethnicity, gender, age, and education were found to be significantly related to collectivistic tendency and/or uncertainty avoidance. Findings also demonstrated that the tendency for collectivism and uncertainty avoidance were both relevant to people’s intention to adopt COVID-19 prevention measures. Results of testing the HBM variables revealed that perceived barriers, perceived self-efficacy, and cues to action were significantly related to preventive behavioral intentions. This study highlights the importance of considering subculture factors when promoting COVID-19 preventive measures in a multicultural society.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72406058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-02DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2022.2047683
James Bingaman, Scott E. Caplan
ABSTRACT Before his permanent suspension from Twitter, former President Trump’s use of Twitter to harm, harass, hurt, or embarrass individuals was well documented, with academics and mainstream news outlets referring to him as a cyberbully. The current study reports a quantitative content analysis of Trump’s Tweets between 2016 and 2019 to determine whether his aggressive behavior online could be considered cyberbullying. Additionally, this study also sought to ascertain Trump’s most frequently used cyberbullying tactics. The results highlight that although Trump frequently employed explicit hostility, name-calling, and rumor-mongering, his behavior on Twitter was not repetitive enough to meet the criteria that researchers often use to define cyberbullying.
{"title":"Cyberbully-in-chief: exploring Donald Trump’s aggressive communication behavior on Twitter","authors":"James Bingaman, Scott E. Caplan","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2022.2047683","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2022.2047683","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Before his permanent suspension from Twitter, former President Trump’s use of Twitter to harm, harass, hurt, or embarrass individuals was well documented, with academics and mainstream news outlets referring to him as a cyberbully. The current study reports a quantitative content analysis of Trump’s Tweets between 2016 and 2019 to determine whether his aggressive behavior online could be considered cyberbullying. Additionally, this study also sought to ascertain Trump’s most frequently used cyberbullying tactics. The results highlight that although Trump frequently employed explicit hostility, name-calling, and rumor-mongering, his behavior on Twitter was not repetitive enough to meet the criteria that researchers often use to define cyberbullying.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85733355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-27DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2022.2032066
Branden Michael Ingersoll
ABSTRACT In response to relentless levels of political polarization in the United States, this essay asks to what extent a shift in pedagogical practices might aid in ameliorating it, especially through the inculcation of rhetorical skills which lend themselves toward the cultivation of a robust form of civic dialogue. To do so, the relationship between rhetoric, (intergroup) dialogue, and debate is assessed and considered with respect to deliberation in the public sphere to provide context for the theoretical maxims and praxis of civic discourse. Then, using the preceding analyses, an evaluative framework is offered to assess the efficacy of dialogic rhetoric in a contemporary setting. Using this framework implementation of the Dialogue and Argumentation for Cultural Literacy Learning in Schools (DIALLS) program being pioneered throughout the European Union into American pedagogy is considered as a means to mitigate future polarizing discourse through the promotion of a nuanced, collaborative approach to meaning making and knowledge construction. Following this examination, a brief assessment of the rhetoric of Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown from Ohio is offered to illustrate the practical applicability of inclusive, dialogic rhetoric in an age of polarization and division.
{"title":"Beyond the abyss: a proposal for navigating polarized positions","authors":"Branden Michael Ingersoll","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2022.2032066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2022.2032066","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In response to relentless levels of political polarization in the United States, this essay asks to what extent a shift in pedagogical practices might aid in ameliorating it, especially through the inculcation of rhetorical skills which lend themselves toward the cultivation of a robust form of civic dialogue. To do so, the relationship between rhetoric, (intergroup) dialogue, and debate is assessed and considered with respect to deliberation in the public sphere to provide context for the theoretical maxims and praxis of civic discourse. Then, using the preceding analyses, an evaluative framework is offered to assess the efficacy of dialogic rhetoric in a contemporary setting. Using this framework implementation of the Dialogue and Argumentation for Cultural Literacy Learning in Schools (DIALLS) program being pioneered throughout the European Union into American pedagogy is considered as a means to mitigate future polarizing discourse through the promotion of a nuanced, collaborative approach to meaning making and knowledge construction. Following this examination, a brief assessment of the rhetoric of Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown from Ohio is offered to illustrate the practical applicability of inclusive, dialogic rhetoric in an age of polarization and division.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72960826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2021.2021910
LaKesha N. Anderson, Jasmyne J. Womack, C. Ledford
ABSTRACT As misinformation is linked to poor health outcomes for pregnant women, and mobile apps provide free and unregulated access to information, it is important to understand the role of credibility in mobile health. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess a reliable scale for measuring mobile health (mHealth) credibility. Based on a previous measure for assessing web credibility, we also sought to identify source credibility dimensions for mobile apps. The mHealth credibility scale included seven items. Three scale dimensions were identified: concern, character, and competence. Both referent source for mobile apps and app developer were significantly associated with perceived mHealth credibility. This study is a first attempt to both design and test a measure of credibility for mobile health apps. This mHealth credibility scale can be used to guide future app development, communication, and medical research.
{"title":"Initial development and testing of a measure of credibility of mobile health apps: a clinical study among women seeking prenatal care","authors":"LaKesha N. Anderson, Jasmyne J. Womack, C. Ledford","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2021.2021910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.2021910","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As misinformation is linked to poor health outcomes for pregnant women, and mobile apps provide free and unregulated access to information, it is important to understand the role of credibility in mobile health. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess a reliable scale for measuring mobile health (mHealth) credibility. Based on a previous measure for assessing web credibility, we also sought to identify source credibility dimensions for mobile apps. The mHealth credibility scale included seven items. Three scale dimensions were identified: concern, character, and competence. Both referent source for mobile apps and app developer were significantly associated with perceived mHealth credibility. This study is a first attempt to both design and test a measure of credibility for mobile health apps. This mHealth credibility scale can be used to guide future app development, communication, and medical research.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78850125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-30DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2021.2017939
Angela M. McGowan-Kirsch
ABSTRACT High-profile examples of the Senate women’s cross-party collaboration, such as the 2013 government shutdown, contribute to the perception that women policymakers are bipartisan. Print, digital, and broadcast journalism serve as units of observation for understanding how the women senators cultivated a shared political image imbued with conventionally-defined “feminine” leadership qualities that linked to bipartisanship. Drawing on their mediated perspectives, I argue that the women of the 113th Senate’s portrayal of feminine leadership traits contributed to the conventional wisdom that women are bipartisan. My analysis indicates that, during a time of rancorous partisanship, the women senators’ public discussion of a sisterhood, a supper club, and communication norms advanced the appearance of being a united force while seeking policy goals in a partisan chamber. By analyzing mediated texts that featured the women in the 113th Senate, I demonstrate how women policymakers collectively depict a legislative style that can become a tool for harnessing power in numbers and maximizing political influence as women while navigating a gendered and partisan space. The contributing factors discussed serve as an entry point for critical inquiry into bipartisan image construction.
{"title":"Women in the 113th Senate cultivating the appearance of bipartisanship","authors":"Angela M. McGowan-Kirsch","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2021.2017939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.2017939","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT High-profile examples of the Senate women’s cross-party collaboration, such as the 2013 government shutdown, contribute to the perception that women policymakers are bipartisan. Print, digital, and broadcast journalism serve as units of observation for understanding how the women senators cultivated a shared political image imbued with conventionally-defined “feminine” leadership qualities that linked to bipartisanship. Drawing on their mediated perspectives, I argue that the women of the 113th Senate’s portrayal of feminine leadership traits contributed to the conventional wisdom that women are bipartisan. My analysis indicates that, during a time of rancorous partisanship, the women senators’ public discussion of a sisterhood, a supper club, and communication norms advanced the appearance of being a united force while seeking policy goals in a partisan chamber. By analyzing mediated texts that featured the women in the 113th Senate, I demonstrate how women policymakers collectively depict a legislative style that can become a tool for harnessing power in numbers and maximizing political influence as women while navigating a gendered and partisan space. The contributing factors discussed serve as an entry point for critical inquiry into bipartisan image construction.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91178451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-16DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2021.2014841
Danielle Ka Lai Lee, Xizhu Xiao, Porismita Borah
ABSTRACT As privacy concern is proven to be a pivotal thought that determines online self-disclosure, the current study examined the simultaneous influence of the antecedents of privacy concern. Specifically, this study focused on the nature of information (i.e., personal involvement) and the diversity of recipients (i.e., audience representation) in influencing individuals’ cognitive processes pertinent to privacy concerns on Facebook. We conducted an experiment and a total of 241 young adults participated in the study. The results suggested that information that was highly involved with oneself would trigger extended thought elaboration related to privacy. However, surprisingly, influence from audience representation in the network was revealed to be minimal. The study underscores the self-serving purpose of privacy concern online, such that users would primarily focus on considerations surrounding themselves. The results of the current study highlight the importance of self-concerns when users are making sense of their decisions pertinent to self-disclosure on SNSs. Future directions are discussed.
{"title":"Antecedents of privacy concern: the examination of “self” and “others” on Facebook","authors":"Danielle Ka Lai Lee, Xizhu Xiao, Porismita Borah","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2021.2014841","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.2014841","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As privacy concern is proven to be a pivotal thought that determines online self-disclosure, the current study examined the simultaneous influence of the antecedents of privacy concern. Specifically, this study focused on the nature of information (i.e., personal involvement) and the diversity of recipients (i.e., audience representation) in influencing individuals’ cognitive processes pertinent to privacy concerns on Facebook. We conducted an experiment and a total of 241 young adults participated in the study. The results suggested that information that was highly involved with oneself would trigger extended thought elaboration related to privacy. However, surprisingly, influence from audience representation in the network was revealed to be minimal. The study underscores the self-serving purpose of privacy concern online, such that users would primarily focus on considerations surrounding themselves. The results of the current study highlight the importance of self-concerns when users are making sense of their decisions pertinent to self-disclosure on SNSs. Future directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77756359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-12DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2021.2009481
A. G. Speno, Danielle Halliwell
ABSTRACT We investigated how parents discuss sexting issues with their adolescent children, with a focus on parental mediation strategies used and barriers encountered. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 parents who had at least one child aged 12–17. Our analysis revealed that parents employed discursive, investigative, and gatekeeping mediation strategies when discussing sexting with their children, and that trusting their child knew better, lacking resources, and feeling uncomfortable were the main barriers to sexting conversations. This research may help parents to have more productive sexting-related conversations with their children, which could reduce risky sexting behaviors and promote a healthy sexuality among adolescents.
{"title":"“It’s not just talking about the birds and the bees anymore”: Parent-child communication about sexting","authors":"A. G. Speno, Danielle Halliwell","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2021.2009481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.2009481","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We investigated how parents discuss sexting issues with their adolescent children, with a focus on parental mediation strategies used and barriers encountered. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 parents who had at least one child aged 12–17. Our analysis revealed that parents employed discursive, investigative, and gatekeeping mediation strategies when discussing sexting with their children, and that trusting their child knew better, lacking resources, and feeling uncomfortable were the main barriers to sexting conversations. This research may help parents to have more productive sexting-related conversations with their children, which could reduce risky sexting behaviors and promote a healthy sexuality among adolescents.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77930720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-03DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2021.1999242
B. Goss
ABSTRACT This investigation introduces a concept that bookends Herman and Chomsky’s seminal theorization of flak. While both Kevlar and flak are deployed on contentious grounds, flak goes on the attack against ideological opponents whereas discursive Kevlar assumes a posture of defense. Kevlar is also distinct from media management strategies that coopt news media and create a Teflon coating around an administration. A case study of National Review’s coverage of the first Trump impeachment maps out Kevlar tendencies. The investigation analyzes the array of Trump-affirming defenses that National Review marshaled during the impeachment. Despite its rarefied reputation, National Review’s discourses were saturated with punditry that refused considered analysis; exceptions to the rule of Kevlar on behalf of Trump are also discussed. National Review’s Kevlar campaign included pervasive attempts to delegitimize the Democratic Party, beginning with vagueness that glossed over the proximal cause of impeachment: Trump’s extortive shakedown of Ukraine’s government over congressionally-certified funds in an effort to seed news narratives favorable to Trump’s 2020 campaign. National Review constructed further Kevlar defenses through “whataboutism” toward Democrats while the publication’s misgivings about Trump were tempered by “confirming criticisms.” One implication is that Trump’s illiberal political project has been immeasurably assisted by elite (“tree-tops”) rightwing platforms.
{"title":"Shield and sword: Discursive Kevlar and National Review's discourses on the first Trump impeachment (2019-2020)","authors":"B. Goss","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2021.1999242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.1999242","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This investigation introduces a concept that bookends Herman and Chomsky’s seminal theorization of flak. While both Kevlar and flak are deployed on contentious grounds, flak goes on the attack against ideological opponents whereas discursive Kevlar assumes a posture of defense. Kevlar is also distinct from media management strategies that coopt news media and create a Teflon coating around an administration. A case study of National Review’s coverage of the first Trump impeachment maps out Kevlar tendencies. The investigation analyzes the array of Trump-affirming defenses that National Review marshaled during the impeachment. Despite its rarefied reputation, National Review’s discourses were saturated with punditry that refused considered analysis; exceptions to the rule of Kevlar on behalf of Trump are also discussed. National Review’s Kevlar campaign included pervasive attempts to delegitimize the Democratic Party, beginning with vagueness that glossed over the proximal cause of impeachment: Trump’s extortive shakedown of Ukraine’s government over congressionally-certified funds in an effort to seed news narratives favorable to Trump’s 2020 campaign. National Review constructed further Kevlar defenses through “whataboutism” toward Democrats while the publication’s misgivings about Trump were tempered by “confirming criticisms.” One implication is that Trump’s illiberal political project has been immeasurably assisted by elite (“tree-tops”) rightwing platforms.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89900253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2021.1998057
D. Levasseur, Elizabeth Remland, Martin S. Munz
ABSTRACT Speech delivery pedagogy has both changed dramatically over the last several centuries and remained remarkably fixed over the last 100 years. In the early 1900s, this pedagogy underwent a dramatic shift from an “elocutionist approach” to a “natural approach” to speech delivery. Since that time, speech delivery pedagogy has remained in an essentially petrified state while our understanding of nonverbal behaviors – the very behaviors at the heart of speech delivery – has grown exponentially. In this essay, we draw upon the expansive nonverbal communication literature to argue for a new approach to teaching speech delivery – an approach we refer to as the interconnected approach. This interconnected approach re-emphasizes the importance of speech delivery, structures the topic of speech delivery around coherent nonverbal clusters, and acknowledges the unnatural pathway to developing a natural speech delivery.
{"title":"The petrified pedagogy of speech delivery: reexamining the Canon of speech delivery through the lens of nonverbal communication research","authors":"D. Levasseur, Elizabeth Remland, Martin S. Munz","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2021.1998057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.1998057","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Speech delivery pedagogy has both changed dramatically over the last several centuries and remained remarkably fixed over the last 100 years. In the early 1900s, this pedagogy underwent a dramatic shift from an “elocutionist approach” to a “natural approach” to speech delivery. Since that time, speech delivery pedagogy has remained in an essentially petrified state while our understanding of nonverbal behaviors – the very behaviors at the heart of speech delivery – has grown exponentially. In this essay, we draw upon the expansive nonverbal communication literature to argue for a new approach to teaching speech delivery – an approach we refer to as the interconnected approach. This interconnected approach re-emphasizes the importance of speech delivery, structures the topic of speech delivery around coherent nonverbal clusters, and acknowledges the unnatural pathway to developing a natural speech delivery.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83799088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：