{"title":"The Russian Conquest of Central Asia: A Study in Imperial Expansion, 1814–1914 by Alexander Morrison (review)","authors":"Ian W. Campbell","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0050","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81393469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SUMMARY:A contribution to the forum "Russia's War on Ukraine and Nineteenth-Century 'Russian Studies,'" this essay tackles the problem of recovering Ukrainian literature in the Russian classical literary canon of the nineteenth century. It charts two directions for the rethinking of Russian literature and Ukrainian-Russian cultural reciprocities in the nineteenth century and offers a reassessment of the Russian literary canon and intellectual history.Резюме:Публикуемое в рамках тематического форума "Война России против Украины и исследования 'русистики' XIX века", это эссе поднимает проблему восстановления статуса украинской литературы в классическом русском литературном каноне XIX века. Обозначив два направления переосмысления российской литературы и украинско-русских культурных контактов в XIX веке, эссе призывает к переоценке русского литературного канона и интеллектуальной истории.
{"title":"Ukrainian-Russian Encounter in the Romantic Era","authors":"Taras Koznarsky","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0034","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:A contribution to the forum \"Russia's War on Ukraine and Nineteenth-Century 'Russian Studies,'\" this essay tackles the problem of recovering Ukrainian literature in the Russian classical literary canon of the nineteenth century. It charts two directions for the rethinking of Russian literature and Ukrainian-Russian cultural reciprocities in the nineteenth century and offers a reassessment of the Russian literary canon and intellectual history.Резюме:Публикуемое в рамках тематического форума \"Война России против Украины и исследования 'русистики' XIX века\", это эссе поднимает проблему восстановления статуса украинской литературы в классическом русском литературном каноне XIX века. Обозначив два направления переосмысления российской литературы и украинско-русских культурных контактов в XIX веке, эссе призывает к переоценке русского литературного канона и интеллектуальной истории.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82107585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Lounsbery, S. Smith-Peter, Olga Maiorova, Taras Koznarsky, Yuliya Ilchuk, Irina Paert, Catherine Gibson, Liliya Berezhnaya, Thomas Marsden, James M. White, Darius Staliūnas, James A. Kapaló, Iuliana Cindrea-Nagy, Sergei Erofeev, Garry Kasparov, Leonid Volkov, Eileen Kane, Михаил Белоусов, Valeria Sobol, Anna Cavazzoni, Alexandra Medzibrodszky, Theodore R. Weeks, Ian W. Campbell, Lucien J. Frary, Elizabeth Banks, Gulnaz Sharafutdinova, Ясын Абдуллаев, A. Vozna
SUMMARY:This is the introduction to the forum "Russia's War on Ukraine and Nineteenth-Century 'Russian Studies,'" which tackles the problem of recovering Ukrainian literature in the Russian classical literary canon of the nineteenth century.Резюме:Это эссе является введением в форум "Война России против Украины и исследования 'русистики' XIX века", обсуждающим проблему восстановления статуса украинской литературы в классическом русском литературном каноне XIX века.
{"title":"The Russian Leviathan: Does History Matter?","authors":"A. Lounsbery, S. Smith-Peter, Olga Maiorova, Taras Koznarsky, Yuliya Ilchuk, Irina Paert, Catherine Gibson, Liliya Berezhnaya, Thomas Marsden, James M. White, Darius Staliūnas, James A. Kapaló, Iuliana Cindrea-Nagy, Sergei Erofeev, Garry Kasparov, Leonid Volkov, Eileen Kane, Михаил Белоусов, Valeria Sobol, Anna Cavazzoni, Alexandra Medzibrodszky, Theodore R. Weeks, Ian W. Campbell, Lucien J. Frary, Elizabeth Banks, Gulnaz Sharafutdinova, Ясын Абдуллаев, A. Vozna","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0029","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This is the introduction to the forum \"Russia's War on Ukraine and Nineteenth-Century 'Russian Studies,'\" which tackles the problem of recovering Ukrainian literature in the Russian classical literary canon of the nineteenth century.Резюме:Это эссе является введением в форум \"Война России против Украины и исследования 'русистики' XIX века\", обсуждающим проблему восстановления статуса украинской литературы в классическом русском литературном каноне XIX века.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83924479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SUMMARY:This is the English translation of a public debate, which was streamed online on June 26, 2022, between two leaders of the anti-Putin liberal opposition, Garry Kasparov and Leonid Volkov. The text is valuable as both a historical source and an attempt at political analysis and prognosis.Резюме:Текст представляет собой английский перевод транскрипта публичных дебатов двух лидеров антипутинской либеральной оппозиции, Гарри Каспарова и Леонида Волкова, которые состоялись онлайн 26 июня 2022 г. Этот материал является одновременно историческим источником и попыткой политического анализа и прогноза
{"title":"Debate: The War in Ukraine, Sanctions against Russia, and the Russian Opposition, June 26, 2022 Moderator: Alexander Plushchev","authors":"Garry Kasparov, Leonid Volkov","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0043","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This is the English translation of a public debate, which was streamed online on June 26, 2022, between two leaders of the anti-Putin liberal opposition, Garry Kasparov and Leonid Volkov. The text is valuable as both a historical source and an attempt at political analysis and prognosis.Резюме:Текст представляет собой английский перевод транскрипта публичных дебатов двух лидеров антипутинской либеральной оппозиции, Гарри Каспарова и Леонида Волкова, которые состоялись онлайн 26 июня 2022 г. Этот материал является одновременно историческим источником и попыткой политического анализа и прогноза","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79470410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SUMMARY:The article explores the ambivalent attitudes toward the introduction of the Gregorian calendar in Romanian society during the interwar period. First adopted by the Romanian state and, in 1924, by the dominant Romanian Orthodox Church, the Gregorian calendar provoked opposition among the Orthodox believers, especially in the former Russian province of Bessarabia, which was incorporated into Romania in 1918. The mass discontent soon spread to Romanian Moldavia as well. Seen as a heresy, the calendar change led to the rise of a dissident movement that became known as the Old Calendarism. Espousing an apocalyptic worldview, Old Calendarists were branded as politically subversive by the government for rejecting the Romanian national project.Резюме:В статье исследуется проблемное отношение в румынском обществе межвоенного периода к введению григорианского календаря. Сначала григорианский календарь был принят румынским государством, а в 1924 г. на него перешла господствующая Румынская православная церковь. Это вызвало протест многих православных верующих, особенно в Бессарабии–бывшей российской губернии, включенной в состав Румынии в 1918 г. Массовое недовольство вскоре распространилось и на румынскую Молдавию. Протестующие считали изменение календаря ересью, что привело к возникновению "старостильного" движения в православной церкви. Разделявшие апокалиптическое мировоззрение старостильники рассматривались правительством как политически подрывной элемент, отрицающий румынский национальный проект.
{"title":"The Calendar and the Sense of Community Belonging: The Emergence of the Old Calendarist Church in Romania","authors":"Iuliana Cindrea-Nagy","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0041","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:The article explores the ambivalent attitudes toward the introduction of the Gregorian calendar in Romanian society during the interwar period. First adopted by the Romanian state and, in 1924, by the dominant Romanian Orthodox Church, the Gregorian calendar provoked opposition among the Orthodox believers, especially in the former Russian province of Bessarabia, which was incorporated into Romania in 1918. The mass discontent soon spread to Romanian Moldavia as well. Seen as a heresy, the calendar change led to the rise of a dissident movement that became known as the Old Calendarism. Espousing an apocalyptic worldview, Old Calendarists were branded as politically subversive by the government for rejecting the Romanian national project.Резюме:В статье исследуется проблемное отношение в румынском обществе межвоенного периода к введению григорианского календаря. Сначала григорианский календарь был принят румынским государством, а в 1924 г. на него перешла господствующая Румынская православная церковь. Это вызвало протест многих православных верующих, особенно в Бессарабии–бывшей российской губернии, включенной в состав Румынии в 1918 г. Массовое недовольство вскоре распространилось и на румынскую Молдавию. Протестующие считали изменение календаря ересью, что привело к возникновению \"старостильного\" движения в православной церкви. Разделявшие апокалиптическое мировоззрение старостильники рассматривались правительством как политически подрывной элемент, отрицающий румынский национальный проект.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91343604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
scholar will learn a great deal from the more “historical” chapters of the book, and I am positive that many of the episodes analyzed in the book will shed new light on the period for historians of Russia as well. In fact, anyone interested in Russian history and culture of the first half of the nineteenth century will benefit a great deal from this study, including undergraduate students and general audiences. I have already recommended this book to my daughter, who is an undergraduate history major with a focus on Russia and Eastern Europe and is looking forward to reading it. This rich and thought-provoking study will certainly not disappoint its readers. Anna CAVAZZONI
{"title":"Haunted Empire: Gothic and the Russian Imperial Uncanny by Valeria Sobol (review)","authors":"Anna Cavazzoni","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0047","url":null,"abstract":"scholar will learn a great deal from the more “historical” chapters of the book, and I am positive that many of the episodes analyzed in the book will shed new light on the period for historians of Russia as well. In fact, anyone interested in Russian history and culture of the first half of the nineteenth century will benefit a great deal from this study, including undergraduate students and general audiences. I have already recommended this book to my daughter, who is an undergraduate history major with a focus on Russia and Eastern Europe and is looking forward to reading it. This rich and thought-provoking study will certainly not disappoint its readers. Anna CAVAZZONI","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85171250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SUMMARY:This article examines the construction of an Orthodox community on the isle of Vormsi on the western coast of the Russian Empire's Estland Province through the approaches of national indifference and confessional ambiguity. Vormsi, a locale overwhelmingly populated by mobile Swedish-speakers, posed particular challenges to the Orthodox clergy both during and after conversion in 1886, especially in terms of language and the evangelical legacy left by a charismatic Swedish preacher. The article analyzes the efforts by a mixed team of Russo-Estonian clergy to claim Vormsi as a space of Orthodoxy and to connect it to the Russian Empire.Резюме:Оперируя концепцией национальной индифферентности и религиозной неопределенности, автор статьи рассматривает случай острова Вормси у западного побережья современной Эстонии. Его протестантское шведоязычное население в 1880-х годах решилось перейти в православие, но после 1905 г. вернулось к лютеранству. И островитяне, и местное русско-эстонское православное духовенство рассматривали обращение как демонстрацию политической лояльности Российской империи. Представления о русской, шведской и эстонской этнической принадлежности также играли свою роль в этой истории, хотя и второстепенную.
{"title":"Changing Tides of Nation and Confession: Building Orthodoxy and Empire on the Island of Vormsi, 1873–1905","authors":"J. White","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0038","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This article examines the construction of an Orthodox community on the isle of Vormsi on the western coast of the Russian Empire's Estland Province through the approaches of national indifference and confessional ambiguity. Vormsi, a locale overwhelmingly populated by mobile Swedish-speakers, posed particular challenges to the Orthodox clergy both during and after conversion in 1886, especially in terms of language and the evangelical legacy left by a charismatic Swedish preacher. The article analyzes the efforts by a mixed team of Russo-Estonian clergy to claim Vormsi as a space of Orthodoxy and to connect it to the Russian Empire.Резюме:Оперируя концепцией национальной индифферентности и религиозной неопределенности, автор статьи рассматривает случай острова Вормси у западного побережья современной Эстонии. Его протестантское шведоязычное население в 1880-х годах решилось перейти в православие, но после 1905 г. вернулось к лютеранству. И островитяне, и местное русско-эстонское православное духовенство рассматривали обращение как демонстрацию политической лояльности Российской империи. Представления о русской, шведской и эстонской этнической принадлежности также играли свою роль в этой истории, хотя и второстепенную.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81901580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SUMMARY:A contribution to the forum "Russia's War on Ukraine and Nineteenth-Century 'Russian Studies,'" this essay draws attention to the predicament of historians who study the period but lack access to Russian archives and libraries.Резюме:Публикуемое в рамках тематического форума "Война России против Украины и исследования 'русистики' XIX века", это эссе поднимает вопрос о проблемах изучения периода без доступа к российским архивам и библиотекам.
{"title":"Rethinking: \"The Russian Archives\"","authors":"S. Smith-Peter","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0032","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:A contribution to the forum \"Russia's War on Ukraine and Nineteenth-Century 'Russian Studies,'\" this essay draws attention to the predicament of historians who study the period but lack access to Russian archives and libraries.Резюме:Публикуемое в рамках тематического форума \"Война России против Украины и исследования 'русистики' XIX века\", это эссе поднимает вопрос о проблемах изучения периода без доступа к российским архивам и библиотекам.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80221235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SUMMARY:Forced reversion to Orthodoxy was one of a number of instruments deployed by the Romanian state to counter religious dissent in the interwar and wartime periods. Based on archival examples of Inochentist practices of resistance, this article argues that eschatology was an important factor influencing Bessarabian peasants' rejection of the Romanian national project. Taking account of the distinct brand of existential eschatology characteristic of Inochentism helps us grasp both the power of religious commitment to override calls for ethnic or national solidarity and the inability of the Romanian state and Orthodox Church to persuade peasants that it was in their existential interest to support and participate in the new political order.Резюме:В межвоенный период и в начале 1940-х гг. румынское государство активно боролось с религиозным инакомыслием. Одним из инструментов этой борьбы было насильственное обращение в православие тех, кого официально рассматривали как сектантов, включая членов общины иннокентьевцев в присоединенной к Румынии Бессарабии. Опираясь на архивные свидетельства практик сопротивления со стороны иннокентьевцев, автор статьи утверждает, что эсхатологические настроения были важным фактором неприятия бессарабскими крестьянами румынского национального проекта. Именно эсхатологические идеи иннокентьевцев объясняют как преобладание приверженности религиозной общине над этнической или национальной солидарностью, так и неспособность румынского государства и православной церкви убедить крестьян в том, что участие в новом политическом порядке отвечало их жизненным интересам.
{"title":"Certifiably Orthodox: Reversion to Orthodoxy and the Challenge of Existential Eschatology in 1930s and 1940s Bessarabia","authors":"James A. Kapaló","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0040","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:Forced reversion to Orthodoxy was one of a number of instruments deployed by the Romanian state to counter religious dissent in the interwar and wartime periods. Based on archival examples of Inochentist practices of resistance, this article argues that eschatology was an important factor influencing Bessarabian peasants' rejection of the Romanian national project. Taking account of the distinct brand of existential eschatology characteristic of Inochentism helps us grasp both the power of religious commitment to override calls for ethnic or national solidarity and the inability of the Romanian state and Orthodox Church to persuade peasants that it was in their existential interest to support and participate in the new political order.Резюме:В межвоенный период и в начале 1940-х гг. румынское государство активно боролось с религиозным инакомыслием. Одним из инструментов этой борьбы было насильственное обращение в православие тех, кого официально рассматривали как сектантов, включая членов общины иннокентьевцев в присоединенной к Румынии Бессарабии. Опираясь на архивные свидетельства практик сопротивления со стороны иннокентьевцев, автор статьи утверждает, что эсхатологические настроения были важным фактором неприятия бессарабскими крестьянами румынского национального проекта. Именно эсхатологические идеи иннокентьевцев объясняют как преобладание приверженности религиозной общине над этнической или национальной солидарностью, так и неспособность румынского государства и православной церкви убедить крестьян в том, что участие в новом политическом порядке отвечало их жизненным интересам.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82676433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SUMMARY:Sergei Erofeev introduces the English translation of a public debate, which was streamed online on June 26, 2022, between two leaders of the anti-Putin liberal opposition, Garry Kasparov and Leonid Volkov. Underscoring the problematic nature of the Russian state in the 2020s, Erofeev proposes characterizing Putin's power with the Russian equivalent for the term: vlast.Резюме:Сергей Ерофеев написал краткое введение к публикуемому в английском переводе транскрипту публичных дебатов двух лидеров антипутинской либеральной оппозиции, Гарри Каспарова и Леонида Волкова, которые состоялись онлайн 26 июня 2022 г. Подчеркивая проблематичный характер российского государства в 2020-х гг., Ерофеев предлагает англоязычным обществоведам использовать русский термин "власть" для описания путинского режима правления.
{"title":"Opposing Vlast: The Kasparov–Volkov Debate and New Critical Perspectives on Russia","authors":"S. Erofeev","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0042","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:Sergei Erofeev introduces the English translation of a public debate, which was streamed online on June 26, 2022, between two leaders of the anti-Putin liberal opposition, Garry Kasparov and Leonid Volkov. Underscoring the problematic nature of the Russian state in the 2020s, Erofeev proposes characterizing Putin's power with the Russian equivalent for the term: vlast.Резюме:Сергей Ерофеев написал краткое введение к публикуемому в английском переводе транскрипту публичных дебатов двух лидеров антипутинской либеральной оппозиции, Гарри Каспарова и Леонида Волкова, которые состоялись онлайн 26 июня 2022 г. Подчеркивая проблематичный характер российского государства в 2020-х гг., Ерофеев предлагает англоязычным обществоведам использовать русский термин \"власть\" для описания путинского режима правления.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78040633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：