Pub Date : 2021-12-06DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.1997946
Christian Larsen
ABSTRACT This paper aims to contribute to the literature relating to the way in which numerical data in IT systems were and are used to govern the development of primary education as data provide the government with the opportunity to ‘see' the system of education in a new way. Economic growth in the Western world after World War II was linked to education. New IT-based forms of technology with numerical data could help planning as there was great confidence in numerical data as objective phenomena. The article shows how the Danish Ministry of Education established a number of IT systems during the 1960s and 1970s. Data within the systems provided the Ministry with an opportunity to ‘see’ the system of education in a new way and thereby change the system. On a wider scale, this article contributes to the present debate on how numerical data is used to govern citizens.
{"title":"Trust In numbers: Danish Primary School Governance 1963–1972","authors":"Christian Larsen","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1997946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1997946","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper aims to contribute to the literature relating to the way in which numerical data in IT systems were and are used to govern the development of primary education as data provide the government with the opportunity to ‘see' the system of education in a new way. Economic growth in the Western world after World War II was linked to education. New IT-based forms of technology with numerical data could help planning as there was great confidence in numerical data as objective phenomena. The article shows how the Danish Ministry of Education established a number of IT systems during the 1960s and 1970s. Data within the systems provided the Ministry with an opportunity to ‘see’ the system of education in a new way and thereby change the system. On a wider scale, this article contributes to the present debate on how numerical data is used to govern citizens.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"42 1","pages":"207 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74971977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-05DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.2005554
P. Ribbins, B. Sherratt
ABSTRACT This paper reports a study of permanent secretaries who served at the Department for Education (DfE) from 1975 to 2011. Located within a context of theories that explain how government bureaucracies operate, it focuses on Michael Bichard. Appointed in July 1995 when attempts were being made to open Whitehall to non-career civil servants, he retired in May 2001 having served 21 months with a Conservative and 48 months with a Labour Secretary of State. He was an unusual permanent secretary. An outsider, state school and red-brick university educated whose father had been a docker, his prior service was in local government. Inter alia, the paper traces his background and career; his role in the merger of the Departments for Education and Employment (DfEE); his relationship with his Secretaries of State; his contribution to education policy; and his estimation of his style and achievements. Consideration is also given to the value of external appointments and to the merits of a descriptive based approach to the study of public sector administration.
{"title":"Portrait of an ‘outsider’ as permanent secretary in Whitehall: the life and times of Michael Bichard – an un-mandarin like mandarin1?","authors":"P. Ribbins, B. Sherratt","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.2005554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.2005554","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper reports a study of permanent secretaries who served at the Department for Education (DfE) from 1975 to 2011. Located within a context of theories that explain how government bureaucracies operate, it focuses on Michael Bichard. Appointed in July 1995 when attempts were being made to open Whitehall to non-career civil servants, he retired in May 2001 having served 21 months with a Conservative and 48 months with a Labour Secretary of State. He was an unusual permanent secretary. An outsider, state school and red-brick university educated whose father had been a docker, his prior service was in local government. Inter alia, the paper traces his background and career; his role in the merger of the Departments for Education and Employment (DfEE); his relationship with his Secretaries of State; his contribution to education policy; and his estimation of his style and achievements. Consideration is also given to the value of external appointments and to the merits of a descriptive based approach to the study of public sector administration.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"6 1","pages":"375 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73665191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-29DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.1988524
J. Cowan, Anna Hogan, Eimear Enright
ABSTRACT The intensification of data collection practices in schooling – often due to state accountability requirements – has resulted in the widespread adoption of commercial student management systems (SMS) in schools. Drawing on a qualitative case study of a New Zealand primary school, this paper investigates its adoption of a commercial SMS, and the ways this product re-engineers schooling processes, including what student data is collected, how school decisions are made, and when work is done by staff. Through this analysis, we argue direct-to-school commercial relationships constitute a new configuration of public–private partnerships in education. We demonstrate the rise of a local education market for data management where responsibility is placed on individual schools to choose a commercial product that will interface with the needs of a public bureaucracy. We end this paper with a critical discussion about how the commercialisation of school administration affects the broader infrastructures of public schooling.
{"title":"The commercialisation of school administration: one school’s enactment of a student management system in Aotearoa New Zealand","authors":"J. Cowan, Anna Hogan, Eimear Enright","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1988524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1988524","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The intensification of data collection practices in schooling – often due to state accountability requirements – has resulted in the widespread adoption of commercial student management systems (SMS) in schools. Drawing on a qualitative case study of a New Zealand primary school, this paper investigates its adoption of a commercial SMS, and the ways this product re-engineers schooling processes, including what student data is collected, how school decisions are made, and when work is done by staff. Through this analysis, we argue direct-to-school commercial relationships constitute a new configuration of public–private partnerships in education. We demonstrate the rise of a local education market for data management where responsibility is placed on individual schools to choose a commercial product that will interface with the needs of a public bureaucracy. We end this paper with a critical discussion about how the commercialisation of school administration affects the broader infrastructures of public schooling.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"41 1","pages":"193 - 206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79691276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-24DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.2006880
Amanda Heffernan, J. Wilkinson
This special issue brings a range of perspectives to explore questions of the connections between notions of precarity and education. Authors in this issue explore the myriad ways precarity affects educational leaders and how precarity and education policy are intertwined broadly. The issue was first conceptualised in 2019 in response to ongoing concerns about precarious employment in education casualised academia in higher education, increasing reports of short-term teaching contracts, and performance-based contracts for school leaders. Education systems and sectors around the globe are functioning in increasingly casualised workforce environments, which has implications for leadership in schools and in higher education institutions. Precarity also holds serious implications for policymakers and for the leaders and educators who have to enact those policies. We know, for example, that the work of school improvement takes time. Developing a highly-skilled and confident teaching workforce requires a long-term investment and commitment. Schools in vulnerable communities face higher rates of turnover and difficulty in staffing. Tackling the big issues in education – inequity, opportunity gaps, democracy and cohesion – also takes time. How are precarious leaders, or leaders in precarious organisations, able to make long-term plans to address these challenges? The rise of the gig economy also holds significant implications for young people today, and how education is preparing them for an uncertain future. This is not new by any means and Lee and Kofman (2012, 389) describe precarious employment as ‘not just the outcome of an inexorable, almost mechanical, pendulum swing from “security” to “flexibility” but a core part of the state’s strategy of development’. While precarious employment and working conditions are not a new development, Millar (2017) suggests that the question may be asked “for whom is precarity new?” Alberti et al. (2018, 3) note that “precarity is [the] consequence of an unequal distribution of protection within society, which leaves some groups more exposed to precariousness than others”. However, they also caution against underestimating the “scope of change in the world of work and employment: it is not only ‘the precariat’ that has to deal with increasing precarity”. Indeed, one of the papers in this special issue (Stacey et al. 2021) deals with the working conditions of a profession that was once considered stable and secure. These
本期特刊带来了一系列视角,探讨不稳定概念与教育之间的联系问题。本期作者探讨了不稳定性影响教育领导者的无数方式,以及不稳定性和教育政策如何广泛地交织在一起。这一问题最初是在2019年提出的,以回应人们对教育就业不稳定、高等教育学术界非正式化、关于短期教学合同的报道越来越多以及学校领导基于绩效的合同的持续担忧。世界各地的教育系统和部门都在日益松散的劳动力环境中运作,这对学校和高等教育机构的领导力产生了影响。不稳定性对政策制定者以及必须制定这些政策的领导人和教育工作者也有严重的影响。例如,我们知道改善学校的工作需要时间。培养一支高技能和自信的教师队伍需要长期的投资和承诺。弱势社区的学校面临更高的人员流动率和人员配备困难。解决教育中的重大问题——不平等、机会差距、民主和凝聚力——也需要时间。不稳定的领导者或不稳定组织中的领导者如何制定长期计划来应对这些挑战?零工经济的兴起也对今天的年轻人产生了重大影响,以及教育如何让他们为不确定的未来做好准备。无论如何,这并不新鲜,Lee和Kofman(2012, 389)将不稳定就业描述为“从‘安全’到‘灵活性’的不可阻挡的、几乎机械的钟摆摆动的结果,而且是国家发展战略的核心部分”。虽然不稳定的就业和工作条件并不是一个新的发展,但米勒(2017)建议,这个问题可能会被问到“不稳定对谁来说是新的?”Alberti等人(2018,3)指出,“不稳定性是社会内部保护分配不平等的结果,这使得一些群体比其他群体更容易受到不稳定性的影响”。然而,他们也警告说,不要低估“工作和就业领域的变化范围:不仅仅是‘不稳定阶层’必须应对日益增加的不稳定”。事实上,本期特刊中的一篇论文(Stacey et al. 2021)讨论了一个曾经被认为稳定和安全的职业的工作条件。这些
{"title":"Educational Leadership and Policy: Precarity and Precariousness","authors":"Amanda Heffernan, J. Wilkinson","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.2006880","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.2006880","url":null,"abstract":"This special issue brings a range of perspectives to explore questions of the connections between notions of precarity and education. Authors in this issue explore the myriad ways precarity affects educational leaders and how precarity and education policy are intertwined broadly. The issue was first conceptualised in 2019 in response to ongoing concerns about precarious employment in education casualised academia in higher education, increasing reports of short-term teaching contracts, and performance-based contracts for school leaders. Education systems and sectors around the globe are functioning in increasingly casualised workforce environments, which has implications for leadership in schools and in higher education institutions. Precarity also holds serious implications for policymakers and for the leaders and educators who have to enact those policies. We know, for example, that the work of school improvement takes time. Developing a highly-skilled and confident teaching workforce requires a long-term investment and commitment. Schools in vulnerable communities face higher rates of turnover and difficulty in staffing. Tackling the big issues in education – inequity, opportunity gaps, democracy and cohesion – also takes time. How are precarious leaders, or leaders in precarious organisations, able to make long-term plans to address these challenges? The rise of the gig economy also holds significant implications for young people today, and how education is preparing them for an uncertain future. This is not new by any means and Lee and Kofman (2012, 389) describe precarious employment as ‘not just the outcome of an inexorable, almost mechanical, pendulum swing from “security” to “flexibility” but a core part of the state’s strategy of development’. While precarious employment and working conditions are not a new development, Millar (2017) suggests that the question may be asked “for whom is precarity new?” Alberti et al. (2018, 3) note that “precarity is [the] consequence of an unequal distribution of protection within society, which leaves some groups more exposed to precariousness than others”. However, they also caution against underestimating the “scope of change in the world of work and employment: it is not only ‘the precariat’ that has to deal with increasing precarity”. Indeed, one of the papers in this special issue (Stacey et al. 2021) deals with the working conditions of a profession that was once considered stable and secure. These","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"14 11 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82877740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-02DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.1997945
M. Jopling, Oliver Harness
ABSTRACT Research into the effects of pressure on school leaders has focused more on its impacts at the system level than on the human impact on leaders. Using theories of vulnerability, this paper attempts to redress this balance, examining the challenges school leaders in North East England faced during the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic and the support they accessed. Combining an online survey of 132 school leaders with in-depth interviews, the study found that the pandemic had an amplifying effect, increasing both leaders' responsibilities and the pressure on them. It also found that many find it difficult to admit when they are under pressure and have no source of support. This suggests new ways need to be found to help all leaders, and particularly male and secondary leaders, to embrace their vulnerability, access professional support, and increase schools' focus on the mental health of children and adults.
{"title":"Embracing vulnerability: how has the Covid-19 pandemic affected the pressures school leaders in Northern England face and how they deal with them?","authors":"M. Jopling, Oliver Harness","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1997945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1997945","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research into the effects of pressure on school leaders has focused more on its impacts at the system level than on the human impact on leaders. Using theories of vulnerability, this paper attempts to redress this balance, examining the challenges school leaders in North East England faced during the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic and the support they accessed. Combining an online survey of 132 school leaders with in-depth interviews, the study found that the pandemic had an amplifying effect, increasing both leaders' responsibilities and the pressure on them. It also found that many find it difficult to admit when they are under pressure and have no source of support. This suggests new ways need to be found to help all leaders, and particularly male and secondary leaders, to embrace their vulnerability, access professional support, and increase schools' focus on the mental health of children and adults.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"1 1","pages":"69 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91024887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-20DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.1985439
G. McNamara, C. Skerritt, J. O’Hara, Shivaun O’Brien, Martin Brown
ABSTRACT This paper reflects on compulsory school self-evaluation in Ireland. It sets important historical and contemporary context by documenting the development of a culture of evaluation in Ireland throughout the 1990s and into the new millennium before charting the rise of school self-evaluation during the austere economic conditions of post-2008 Ireland. Three key reasons are proposed for the rise of school self-evaluation: the influence of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the perceived need for more accountability, and the drive towards self-managing schools. In debating the purpose of school self-evaluation in Ireland it is put forward that it is not underpinned by any single logic, but an assemblage of overlapping logics interwoven by complements and contradictions. It is concluded that while improvement is predominantly promoted in official discourse, it is accountability and economic logics that dominate.
{"title":"For improvement, accountability, or the economy? Reflecting on the purpose(s) of school self-evaluation in Ireland","authors":"G. McNamara, C. Skerritt, J. O’Hara, Shivaun O’Brien, Martin Brown","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1985439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1985439","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper reflects on compulsory school self-evaluation in Ireland. It sets important historical and contemporary context by documenting the development of a culture of evaluation in Ireland throughout the 1990s and into the new millennium before charting the rise of school self-evaluation during the austere economic conditions of post-2008 Ireland. Three key reasons are proposed for the rise of school self-evaluation: the influence of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the perceived need for more accountability, and the drive towards self-managing schools. In debating the purpose of school self-evaluation in Ireland it is put forward that it is not underpinned by any single logic, but an assemblage of overlapping logics interwoven by complements and contradictions. It is concluded that while improvement is predominantly promoted in official discourse, it is accountability and economic logics that dominate.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"24 1","pages":"158 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74839670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-06DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.1985976
Natasha N. Johnson, J. Fournillier
ABSTRACT This paper is a collation of the experiences of four Black women, all senior-level educational leaders in the United States of America. Considering the predominance of White males in educational leadership, our paper furthers the conversation around race-gender diversification in this realm. We employed a hermeneutic phenomenological approach, focusing on the intersections of race and gender, in the effort to challenge epistemological incongruencies within this context. Using in-depth, timed, semi-structured interviews, participants reflected on their journeys, experiences, and perceptions as non-archetypal leaders in education. In highlighting contributors’ perspectives,our objective was to bring the matter of race-gender underrepresentation in educational leadership to the forefront. Study participants revealed the importance of visibility, education, collaboration, exposure, mentorship, pursuit, authenticity, and living one's truth in the move towards diversifying the educational leadership sphere. Participants’ recollections underscore the need for more research specific to the journeys of non-typical educational leaders in the United States.
{"title":"Increasing diversity in leadership: perspectives of four Black women educational leaders in the context of the United States","authors":"Natasha N. Johnson, J. Fournillier","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1985976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1985976","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper is a collation of the experiences of four Black women, all senior-level educational leaders in the United States of America. Considering the predominance of White males in educational leadership, our paper furthers the conversation around race-gender diversification in this realm. We employed a hermeneutic phenomenological approach, focusing on the intersections of race and gender, in the effort to challenge epistemological incongruencies within this context. Using in-depth, timed, semi-structured interviews, participants reflected on their journeys, experiences, and perceptions as non-archetypal leaders in education. In highlighting contributors’ perspectives,our objective was to bring the matter of race-gender underrepresentation in educational leadership to the forefront. Study participants revealed the importance of visibility, education, collaboration, exposure, mentorship, pursuit, authenticity, and living one's truth in the move towards diversifying the educational leadership sphere. Participants’ recollections underscore the need for more research specific to the journeys of non-typical educational leaders in the United States.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"32 1","pages":"174 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88554266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-02DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.1975367
B. Arnold, M. Rahimi, Phillip F. Riley
Over the last 18 months, the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had dramatic implications for education systems across the globe. At the peak of the crisis, 1.6 billion students from over 190 countries were out of school and over 100 million school leaders, teachers and other personnel had to contend with a new world of work in which schools were closed (UNESCO 2021). In Australia, state and territory governments have worked in consultation with one another and the federal government to respond to outbreaks. Historically, the governance of schooling has been a site of conflict for these authorities. In responding to the pandemic, periods of federal-state cooperation have been disrupted by disputes as federal authorities have attempted to intervene in matters that are the constitutional responsibility of states. State-level policymakers have introduced the measures and policy directives that determine how schools operate during the pandemic. In the early phase of the pandemic, all State governments enforced the closure of school buildings. Since then, state governments have introduced restrictions in response to outbreaks within their jurisdictions. Some states experienced heavy and prolonged restrictions and lockdowns (e.g. Victoria and NSW) and schools were closed on multiple occasions during 2020 and 2021. In other states, such as WA and South Australia there have been relatively few school closures. However, the COVID conditions were a cause of stress for the school leaders across the country. At the school level, Australian principals and school leaders were responsible for dealing with the disruption brought about by the pandemic and ensuring that policy directives were effectively implemented. The new circumstances brought about by the pandemic presented school leaders with new challenges and in some cases radically transformed the school leadership role. Research in other countries and contexts has shown that school leaders had to make highly complex decisions; deal with increased workload; lead in the context of rapidly changing guidelines and circumstances; and provide support to school communities that were coping with severe illness and death (Beauchamp et al. 2021; OECD 2021). School leaders also had to rapidly develop new sills in order to lead the transition to online learning (Arar et al. 2021).
在过去的18个月里,2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对全球教育系统产生了巨大影响。在危机最严重的时候,来自190多个国家的16亿学生失学,1亿多学校领导、教师和其他工作人员不得不面对学校关闭的新世界(教科文组织,2021年)。在澳大利亚,州和地区政府相互协商,并与联邦政府协商,以应对疫情。从历史上看,学校的管理一直是这些当局冲突的地方。在应对这一流行病的过程中,由于联邦当局试图干预属于各州宪法责任的事项,联邦与州之间的合作时期因争端而中断。州一级的政策制定者已经出台了决定学校在大流行期间如何运作的措施和政策指令。在大流行的早期阶段,所有州政府都强制关闭了学校建筑。从那时起,各州政府为应对其管辖范围内的疫情采取了限制措施。一些州(如维多利亚州和新南威尔士州)经历了严重和长期的限制和封锁,学校在2020年和2021年期间多次关闭。在西澳和南澳大利亚等其他州,关闭的学校相对较少。然而,新冠肺炎疫情给全国各地的学校领导带来了压力。在学校一级,澳大利亚校长和学校领导负责处理大流行病带来的中断,并确保政策指示得到有效执行。大流行带来的新情况给学校领导带来了新的挑战,在某些情况下根本改变了学校的领导作用。在其他国家和背景下的研究表明,学校领导必须做出高度复杂的决定;处理增加的工作量;在指导方针和环境迅速变化的背景下发挥领导作用;并为应对严重疾病和死亡的学校社区提供支持(Beauchamp et al. 2021;经合组织2021)。学校领导也必须迅速发展新技能,以领导向在线学习的过渡(Arar等人,2021)。
{"title":"Working through the first year of the pandemic: a snapshot of Australian school leaders’ work roles and responsibilities and health and wellbeing during covid-19","authors":"B. Arnold, M. Rahimi, Phillip F. Riley","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1975367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1975367","url":null,"abstract":"Over the last 18 months, the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had dramatic implications for education systems across the globe. At the peak of the crisis, 1.6 billion students from over 190 countries were out of school and over 100 million school leaders, teachers and other personnel had to contend with a new world of work in which schools were closed (UNESCO 2021). In Australia, state and territory governments have worked in consultation with one another and the federal government to respond to outbreaks. Historically, the governance of schooling has been a site of conflict for these authorities. In responding to the pandemic, periods of federal-state cooperation have been disrupted by disputes as federal authorities have attempted to intervene in matters that are the constitutional responsibility of states. State-level policymakers have introduced the measures and policy directives that determine how schools operate during the pandemic. In the early phase of the pandemic, all State governments enforced the closure of school buildings. Since then, state governments have introduced restrictions in response to outbreaks within their jurisdictions. Some states experienced heavy and prolonged restrictions and lockdowns (e.g. Victoria and NSW) and schools were closed on multiple occasions during 2020 and 2021. In other states, such as WA and South Australia there have been relatively few school closures. However, the COVID conditions were a cause of stress for the school leaders across the country. At the school level, Australian principals and school leaders were responsible for dealing with the disruption brought about by the pandemic and ensuring that policy directives were effectively implemented. The new circumstances brought about by the pandemic presented school leaders with new challenges and in some cases radically transformed the school leadership role. Research in other countries and contexts has shown that school leaders had to make highly complex decisions; deal with increased workload; lead in the context of rapidly changing guidelines and circumstances; and provide support to school communities that were coping with severe illness and death (Beauchamp et al. 2021; OECD 2021). School leaders also had to rapidly develop new sills in order to lead the transition to online learning (Arar et al. 2021).","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"44 1","pages":"301 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90899247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-02DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.1981018
J. Wilkinson, Amanda Heffernan
We are delighted to introduce the first in our occasional series of rapid response papers on the highly topical issue of school leadership and the Covid 19 pandemic. We warmly thank the contributors of these papers for being willing to provide this ‘taster’ for readers and potential contributors of what we envisage for these collections. As noted in our editorial to this issue, the aim of this series to ‘to rapidly engage with highly topical issues that are in the public arena and may have substantial impacts on policy and practice in the field of educational leadership, management, and administration’ (Heffernan and Wilkinson, this issue). As editors, we felt that the impact of Covid 19 on school leaders across contexts was indeed a highly topical issue with substantial impacts and necessitated a rapid response. The first paper by Pat Thomson, Toby Greany and Nicholas Martindale speaks to many of the impacts on wellbeing that school leaders are experiencing as they bear the brunt of government initiatives to deal with the pandemic while keeping schools functioning. Drawing on a national survey of school leaders which examined the impact of the pandemic on their stress levels and career plans, the paper makes for sobering reading. It documents the main sources of stress that have led to a significant erosion of trust in government and intentions of a third of school leaders surveyed to exit the profession early (Thomson et al. 2021, this issue). If these intentions are followed through, the medium to long-term implications for English schooling are dire. The paper concludes with important recommendations for how this trust deficit can be addressed. The second paper by Ben Arnold and Mark Rahimi examines the impact of the pandemic on Australian principals’ health, well being and work roles in 2020. The survey data draws from the Australian Principal Health, Safety and Wellbeing Survey (APHSWS), an annual survey of principals which has been running for ten years. The paper identifies which aspects of school leaders’ work have changed in 2020, compared with survey data from 2011 to 2019. It finds that key aspects of their work had changed a great deal in 2020, included job demands, interpersonal relations and role, values at work and social support and work-life balance. What was striking was that some key aspects such as workloads had slightly decreased, admittedly off a very high base of working hours, whilst other areas such as workplace justice had deteriorated. The implications of these findings remain to be teased out further, but they provide an important snapshot of the very challenging environments in which Australian principals continue to grapple. Both papers draw on survey data which provides a compelling picture of general trends of the impact on school leaders during the pandemic. However, as Thomson, Greany and Martindale observe in their first paper, what is less clear are the impacts of Covid on leaders serving particular types of s
我们很高兴介绍我们关于学校领导和Covid - 19大流行这一高度热门问题的快速反应系列论文中的第一篇。我们衷心感谢这些论文的贡献者愿意为读者和潜在的贡献者提供这个“品尝器”,我们为这些集合设想了什么。正如我们在本期社论中所指出的那样,本系列的目的是“迅速参与到公共领域中高度热门的问题中,这些问题可能对教育领导、管理和行政领域的政策和实践产生重大影响”(Heffernan和Wilkinson,本期)。作为编辑,我们认为2019冠状病毒病对学校领导的影响确实是一个高度热门的问题,具有重大影响,需要迅速做出反应。帕特·汤姆森(Pat Thomson)、托比·格雷尼(Toby Greany)和尼古拉斯·马丁代尔(Nicholas Martindale)撰写的第一篇论文谈到了学校领导正在经历的许多对福祉的影响,因为他们在保持学校运转的同时,承受着政府应对疫情举措的冲击。根据一项针对学校领导的全国性调查,该调查研究了疫情对他们的压力水平和职业规划的影响,这篇论文读起来发人深省。它记录了压力的主要来源,导致对政府的信任受到严重侵蚀,三分之一的受访学校领导有意提前退出该行业(Thomson et al. 2021,本期)。如果这些意图得以实现,对英语教育的中长期影响将是可怕的。论文最后就如何解决这一信任赤字提出了重要建议。本·阿诺德和马克·拉希米的第二篇论文研究了2020年新冠肺炎疫情对澳大利亚校长健康、福祉和工作角色的影响。调查数据来自澳大利亚校长健康、安全和福利调查(APHSWS),这是一项针对校长的年度调查,已经进行了十年。与2011年至2019年的调查数据相比,该论文确定了2020年学校领导工作的哪些方面发生了变化。调查发现,在2020年,他们工作的关键方面发生了很大变化,包括工作需求、人际关系和角色、工作价值观、社会支持以及工作与生活的平衡。令人惊讶的是,一些关键方面,如工作量略有下降,诚然,这是在一个非常高的工作时间基础上,而其他方面,如工作场所的公平性,则有所恶化。这些发现的含义仍有待进一步梳理,但它们为澳大利亚校长继续努力应对的非常具有挑战性的环境提供了重要的快照。这两篇论文都利用了调查数据,提供了一幅令人信服的大流行期间对学校领导影响的总体趋势的图景。然而,正如Thomson、Greany和Martindale在他们的第一篇论文中所观察到的那样,不太清楚的是,新冠病毒对服务于特定类型学校(如高度弱势群体、小型和农村学校等)的领导者的影响。我们期待来自其他贡献者的更多见解
{"title":"Introduction to rapid response papers’ special issue: school leadership and the pandemic","authors":"J. Wilkinson, Amanda Heffernan","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1981018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1981018","url":null,"abstract":"We are delighted to introduce the first in our occasional series of rapid response papers on the highly topical issue of school leadership and the Covid 19 pandemic. We warmly thank the contributors of these papers for being willing to provide this ‘taster’ for readers and potential contributors of what we envisage for these collections. As noted in our editorial to this issue, the aim of this series to ‘to rapidly engage with highly topical issues that are in the public arena and may have substantial impacts on policy and practice in the field of educational leadership, management, and administration’ (Heffernan and Wilkinson, this issue). As editors, we felt that the impact of Covid 19 on school leaders across contexts was indeed a highly topical issue with substantial impacts and necessitated a rapid response. The first paper by Pat Thomson, Toby Greany and Nicholas Martindale speaks to many of the impacts on wellbeing that school leaders are experiencing as they bear the brunt of government initiatives to deal with the pandemic while keeping schools functioning. Drawing on a national survey of school leaders which examined the impact of the pandemic on their stress levels and career plans, the paper makes for sobering reading. It documents the main sources of stress that have led to a significant erosion of trust in government and intentions of a third of school leaders surveyed to exit the profession early (Thomson et al. 2021, this issue). If these intentions are followed through, the medium to long-term implications for English schooling are dire. The paper concludes with important recommendations for how this trust deficit can be addressed. The second paper by Ben Arnold and Mark Rahimi examines the impact of the pandemic on Australian principals’ health, well being and work roles in 2020. The survey data draws from the Australian Principal Health, Safety and Wellbeing Survey (APHSWS), an annual survey of principals which has been running for ten years. The paper identifies which aspects of school leaders’ work have changed in 2020, compared with survey data from 2011 to 2019. It finds that key aspects of their work had changed a great deal in 2020, included job demands, interpersonal relations and role, values at work and social support and work-life balance. What was striking was that some key aspects such as workloads had slightly decreased, admittedly off a very high base of working hours, whilst other areas such as workplace justice had deteriorated. The implications of these findings remain to be teased out further, but they provide an important snapshot of the very challenging environments in which Australian principals continue to grapple. Both papers draw on survey data which provides a compelling picture of general trends of the impact on school leaders during the pandemic. However, as Thomson, Greany and Martindale observe in their first paper, what is less clear are the impacts of Covid on leaders serving particular types of s","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"8 1","pages":"294 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79985022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-13DOI: 10.1080/00220620.2021.1977262
Martin Mills, S. Riddle, Glenda McGregor, A. Howell
ABSTRACT Curricular justice, achieved through a counter-hegemonic curriculum that serves the needs of the least rather than most advantaged members of society, plays a central role in providing more equitable access to meaningful education for all young people. We contend that the defining features of the contemporary schooling context in many parts of the globe, including Australia, are growing inequality and increasing disparity between students who have access to educational opportunities and outcomes, and those who do not. We take Connell’s claims—made in Schools and Social Justice, published in 1993—of the centrality of social justice in schooling and consider its relevance nearly 30 years later. In particular, we argue that curricular justice must sit at the heart of schooling that fosters democratic participation and meaningful opportunities for civic participation and belonging within society.
课程公正是通过一个反霸权的课程来实现的,它服务于社会中最弱势而不是最有利的成员的需求,在为所有年轻人提供更公平的有意义的教育机会方面发挥着核心作用。我们认为,在包括澳大利亚在内的全球许多地区,当代学校教育环境的决定性特征是,有机会获得教育机会和成果的学生与没有机会获得教育机会和成果的学生之间的不平等和差距日益扩大。我们采用康奈尔在1993年出版的《学校与社会正义》(Schools and Social Justice)一书中提出的社会正义在学校教育中的核心地位,并考虑其在近30年后的相关性。特别是,我们认为课程公正必须成为学校教育的核心,以促进民主参与和公民参与和社会归属感的有意义的机会。
{"title":"Towards an understanding of curricular justice and democratic schooling","authors":"Martin Mills, S. Riddle, Glenda McGregor, A. Howell","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1977262","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1977262","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Curricular justice, achieved through a counter-hegemonic curriculum that serves the needs of the least rather than most advantaged members of society, plays a central role in providing more equitable access to meaningful education for all young people. We contend that the defining features of the contemporary schooling context in many parts of the globe, including Australia, are growing inequality and increasing disparity between students who have access to educational opportunities and outcomes, and those who do not. We take Connell’s claims—made in Schools and Social Justice, published in 1993—of the centrality of social justice in schooling and consider its relevance nearly 30 years later. In particular, we argue that curricular justice must sit at the heart of schooling that fosters democratic participation and meaningful opportunities for civic participation and belonging within society.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"15 1","pages":"345 - 356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89965211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}