首页 > 最新文献

Computer Science Education最新文献

英文 中文
Towards a learning progression of sequencing and algorithm design for five- and six-years-old children engaging with an educational robot 面向五、六岁儿童的排序和算法设计学习进程,与教育机器人互动
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2255058
Camilo Vieira, J. Chiu, B. Velasquez
ABSTRACTBackground and Context Computational thinking (CT) is a fundamental skill and a new form of literacy that everyone should develop to participate in civic society. Sequencing and algorithmic thinking are at the core of CT. This study looked into how young children enrolled in a kindergarten in Colombia develop CT skills.Objective This paper aims to develop a learning progression of sequencing and algorithm design for early childhood. This goal is complemented by identifying the challenges children face to advance into more sophisticated approaches to problem-solving using algorithmic thinking.Method Fourteen five- and six-year-old students participated in this study. These children participated in unplugged learning activities, and solved two sets challenges with the BeeBot. We used a grounded theory approach to analyze how they solved these algorithmic thinking activities and the challenges they faced in this process.Findings Our results suggest four increasingly sophisticated approaches to solving these activities: step-by-step, simple decomposition, advanced decomposition, and full algorithm design. We also found different challenges students faced when working on these activities. These challenges can relate to critical cognitive skills.Implications These results will enable educators to support student learning about CT. These results also open new questions about the relationship between cognitive skills and CT activities in early childhood.KEYWORDS: Computational thinkingearly childhoodlearning progressionsequencingalgorithmic thinkingvisuospatial skills AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Mariana Arboleda, Gabriela de la Rosa, Roxana Quintero, Britny Velasquez, Gisella Jassir, and Angélica Carrasquilla for all the data collection support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Fulbright Colombia and Center for Global Inquiry and Innovation at theUniversity of Virginia.
摘要计算思维(Computational thinking, CT)是每个人参与公民社会都应该培养的一种基本技能和一种新的素养形式。排序和算法思维是CT的核心。这项研究调查了在哥伦比亚一所幼儿园就读的幼儿如何发展CT技能。目的开发一种适合幼儿学习的排序和算法设计方法。这一目标的补充是,确定儿童面临的挑战,以便使用算法思维进入更复杂的解决问题的方法。方法14名5 ~ 6岁学生参与本研究。这些孩子参加了不插电学习活动,并通过BeeBot解决了两组挑战。我们用扎根理论的方法来分析他们是如何解决这些算法思维活动的,以及他们在这个过程中面临的挑战。我们的研究结果提出了四种越来越复杂的方法来解决这些活动:逐步分解,简单分解,高级分解和完整的算法设计。我们还发现学生们在进行这些活动时面临着不同的挑战。这些挑战可能与关键的认知技能有关。这些结果将使教育者能够支持学生学习CT。这些结果也为儿童早期认知技能和CT活动之间的关系提出了新的问题。我们要感谢Mariana Arboleda、Gabriela de la Rosa、Roxana Quintero、Britny Velasquez、Gisella Jassir和angsamicica Carrasquilla对所有数据收集的支持。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。这项工作得到了哥伦比亚富布赖特基金会和弗吉尼亚大学全球研究与创新中心的支持。
{"title":"Towards a learning progression of sequencing and algorithm design for five- and six-years-old children engaging with an educational robot","authors":"Camilo Vieira, J. Chiu, B. Velasquez","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2255058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2255058","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground and Context Computational thinking (CT) is a fundamental skill and a new form of literacy that everyone should develop to participate in civic society. Sequencing and algorithmic thinking are at the core of CT. This study looked into how young children enrolled in a kindergarten in Colombia develop CT skills.Objective This paper aims to develop a learning progression of sequencing and algorithm design for early childhood. This goal is complemented by identifying the challenges children face to advance into more sophisticated approaches to problem-solving using algorithmic thinking.Method Fourteen five- and six-year-old students participated in this study. These children participated in unplugged learning activities, and solved two sets challenges with the BeeBot. We used a grounded theory approach to analyze how they solved these algorithmic thinking activities and the challenges they faced in this process.Findings Our results suggest four increasingly sophisticated approaches to solving these activities: step-by-step, simple decomposition, advanced decomposition, and full algorithm design. We also found different challenges students faced when working on these activities. These challenges can relate to critical cognitive skills.Implications These results will enable educators to support student learning about CT. These results also open new questions about the relationship between cognitive skills and CT activities in early childhood.KEYWORDS: Computational thinkingearly childhoodlearning progressionsequencingalgorithmic thinkingvisuospatial skills AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Mariana Arboleda, Gabriela de la Rosa, Roxana Quintero, Britny Velasquez, Gisella Jassir, and Angélica Carrasquilla for all the data collection support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Fulbright Colombia and Center for Global Inquiry and Innovation at theUniversity of Virginia.","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136012941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterizing changes in teacher practice and values through co-design and implementation of computational thinking integrated biology units 通过计算思维整合生物单元的共同设计与实施来描述教师实践与价值观的变化
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2265763
Amanda Peel, Sugat Dabholkar, Gabriella Anton, Mike Horn, Uri Wilensky
ABSTRACTBackground and Context To better reflect the computational nature of STEM disciplines and deepen learning of science content computational thinking (CT) should be integrated in science curricula. Teachers have a critical role in supporting effective student learning with CT integrated curricula in classroom settings.Objective Our team worked with high school teachers to co-design and implement CT-integrated biology units.Method We use a model of professional growth and qualitative case studies to characterize changes in teacher practice and values through their involvement in co-design and implementation of a CT-integrated biology unit.Findings Teachers followed similar pathways of professional growth, but their participation and perceptions varied, resulting in three dimensions: 1) participation during design, 2) participation in co-design during implementation, and 3) perception of CT benefits related to student learning.Implications It is important to support teacher comfort and engagement in the co-design process in order to better facilitate professional growth and CT integration.KEYWORDS: Computational thinkingprofessional growthco-designsecondary teachersprofessional developmentin-service teachers AcknowledgmentsThis work was made possible through generous support from the National Science Foundation (grants DRL-1640201 and DRL-1842374) and the Spencer Foundation (Award #201600069). Any opinions, findings, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy–Weinberg_principle2. https://www.hhmi.org/biointeractive/making-fittest-natural-selection-and-adaptationAdditional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation [DRL-1640201 and DRL-1842374]; Spencer Foundation [201600069].
摘要背景与背景为了更好地体现STEM学科的计算性,深化科学内容的学习,应将计算思维(computational thinking, CT)融入科学课程。教师在课堂环境中支持学生通过CT综合课程有效学习方面发挥着关键作用。目的本研究小组与高中教师合作,共同设计和实施ct集成生物单元。方法我们使用专业成长模型和定性案例研究来描述教师实践和价值观的变化,通过他们参与共同设计和实施ct集成生物单元。教师遵循相似的专业成长路径,但他们的参与和感知不同,导致三个维度:1)参与设计,2)参与共同设计实施,以及3)感知与学生学习相关的CT益处。为了更好地促进专业成长和CT整合,在协同设计过程中支持教师的舒适和参与是很重要的。本研究得到了美国国家科学基金会(拨款DRL-1640201和DRL-1842374)和斯宾塞基金会(奖励#201600069)的慷慨支持。本材料中表达的任何意见、发现或建议均为作者的意见,并不一定反映资助组织的观点。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy-Weinberg_principle2。本文由国家自然科学基金资助[DRL-1640201和DRL-1842374];斯宾塞基金会[201600069]。
{"title":"Characterizing changes in teacher practice and values through co-design and implementation of computational thinking integrated biology units","authors":"Amanda Peel, Sugat Dabholkar, Gabriella Anton, Mike Horn, Uri Wilensky","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2265763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2265763","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground and Context To better reflect the computational nature of STEM disciplines and deepen learning of science content computational thinking (CT) should be integrated in science curricula. Teachers have a critical role in supporting effective student learning with CT integrated curricula in classroom settings.Objective Our team worked with high school teachers to co-design and implement CT-integrated biology units.Method We use a model of professional growth and qualitative case studies to characterize changes in teacher practice and values through their involvement in co-design and implementation of a CT-integrated biology unit.Findings Teachers followed similar pathways of professional growth, but their participation and perceptions varied, resulting in three dimensions: 1) participation during design, 2) participation in co-design during implementation, and 3) perception of CT benefits related to student learning.Implications It is important to support teacher comfort and engagement in the co-design process in order to better facilitate professional growth and CT integration.KEYWORDS: Computational thinkingprofessional growthco-designsecondary teachersprofessional developmentin-service teachers AcknowledgmentsThis work was made possible through generous support from the National Science Foundation (grants DRL-1640201 and DRL-1842374) and the Spencer Foundation (Award #201600069). Any opinions, findings, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy–Weinberg_principle2. https://www.hhmi.org/biointeractive/making-fittest-natural-selection-and-adaptationAdditional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation [DRL-1640201 and DRL-1842374]; Spencer Foundation [201600069].","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134975708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Elementary teachers’ experiences in online professional development for literacy-focused computer science instruction for all learners 小学教师在面向所有学习者的以素养为中心的计算机科学教学的在线专业发展方面的经验
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2263831
Jamie Colwell, Amy Hutchison, Kristie Gutierrez, Jeff Offutt, Anya Evmenova
ABSTRACTBackground & Context This research focused on an online professional development (PD), the Inclusive Computer Science Model of PD, to support integrating computer science and computational thinking for all learners into K-5 literacy instruction.Objective This research was conducted to understand elementary teachers’ perceptions of the PD.Method We used a qualitative case study methodology to collect multiple sources of perception-focused data from 10 purposefully selected participants in the PD and used a general inductive approach to data analysis.Findings Three themes emerged that focus on teachers’ perceptions, with multiple considerations for how teachers viewed the concept of computer science, the potential for students with disabilities to participate in computer science instruction, and how they considered UDL in this instructionImplications Findings have implications for the potential of computer science integration into elementary literacy instruction and how teachers may independently use computer science instruction that supports all learners in their future teaching.KEYWORDS: Computer sciencecomputational thinkingliteracyelementary instructionprofessional development Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award 1837380.
摘要背景与背景本研究的重点是在线专业发展(PD),即PD的包容性计算机科学模型,以支持将所有学习者的计算机科学和计算思维整合到K-5识字教学中。目的了解小学教师对人格障碍的认知。方法采用定性案例研究方法,从10名有目的地选择的PD参与者中收集多种来源的以感知为中心的数据,并使用一般归纳方法进行数据分析。三个主题集中在教师的看法上,多重考虑了教师如何看待计算机科学的概念,残疾学生参与计算机科学教学的潜力,以及他们如何在本教学中考虑UDL的含义研究结果对将计算机科学整合到初级识字教学中的潜力以及教师如何在未来的教学中独立地使用计算机科学教学来支持所有学习者具有启示意义。关键词:计算机科学;计算思维;读写能力;基础教学;本研究得到了美国国家科学基金会1837380奖的支持。
{"title":"Elementary teachers’ experiences in online professional development for literacy-focused computer science instruction for all learners","authors":"Jamie Colwell, Amy Hutchison, Kristie Gutierrez, Jeff Offutt, Anya Evmenova","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2263831","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2263831","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground & Context This research focused on an online professional development (PD), the Inclusive Computer Science Model of PD, to support integrating computer science and computational thinking for all learners into K-5 literacy instruction.Objective This research was conducted to understand elementary teachers’ perceptions of the PD.Method We used a qualitative case study methodology to collect multiple sources of perception-focused data from 10 purposefully selected participants in the PD and used a general inductive approach to data analysis.Findings Three themes emerged that focus on teachers’ perceptions, with multiple considerations for how teachers viewed the concept of computer science, the potential for students with disabilities to participate in computer science instruction, and how they considered UDL in this instructionImplications Findings have implications for the potential of computer science integration into elementary literacy instruction and how teachers may independently use computer science instruction that supports all learners in their future teaching.KEYWORDS: Computer sciencecomputational thinkingliteracyelementary instructionprofessional development Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award 1837380.","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135829403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of reflection in auto-graders: an empirical study of novice coders 反思对自动评分的影响:对编程新手的实证研究
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2262877
Fatima Abu Deeb, Timothy Hickey
ABSTRACTBackground and Context Auto-graders are praised by novice students learning to program, as they provide them with automatic feedback about their problem-solving process. However, some students often make random changes when they have errors in their code, without engaging in deliberate thinking about the cause of the error.Objective To investigate whether requiring students using an auto-grading system to reflect on the errors in their code would reduce trial and error behavior often seen in such systems.Method The paper analyzes the impact of reflection per student and per problem using paired t-tests.Findings Students took fewer steps to solve the problem in reflective sessions than in Usual Debugging Sessions (4.33 vs 8.04) and they made half as many syntax errors, logic errors, and runtime errors. However, they took more time between runs.Implications This paper provides evidence that requiring reflection in autograding systems can improve student debugging skills.KEYWORDS: Reflective debuggingintroductory programming classesonline IDEactionable learning analyticsauto gradersnovice programming Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical approvalThis study was done in accordance with the university IRB with reference #15041.Data availability statementThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24188010
自动评分器受到学习编程的新手的赞扬,因为它们为他们提供了关于他们解决问题过程的自动反馈。然而,一些学生经常在他们的代码中有错误时随意更改,而没有认真思考错误的原因。目的探讨要求使用自动评分系统的学生反思其代码中的错误是否会减少此类系统中经常出现的试错行为。方法采用配对t检验分析每个学生和每个问题反思的影响。学生在反思会话中解决问题的步骤比在常规调试会话中(4.33 vs 8.04)少,他们犯的语法错误,逻辑错误和运行时错误是一半。然而,他们的跑步间隔时间更长。本文提供的证据表明,在自动评分系统中要求反思可以提高学生的调试技能。关键词:反思性调试,编程入门课程,在线,可操作学习,分析,自动评分,编程新手披露声明,作者未报告潜在利益冲突。伦理批准本研究按照大学IRB进行,参考文献#15041。数据可用性声明在当前研究期间生成和/或分析的数据集https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24188010
{"title":"Impact of reflection in auto-graders: an empirical study of novice coders","authors":"Fatima Abu Deeb, Timothy Hickey","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2262877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2262877","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground and Context Auto-graders are praised by novice students learning to program, as they provide them with automatic feedback about their problem-solving process. However, some students often make random changes when they have errors in their code, without engaging in deliberate thinking about the cause of the error.Objective To investigate whether requiring students using an auto-grading system to reflect on the errors in their code would reduce trial and error behavior often seen in such systems.Method The paper analyzes the impact of reflection per student and per problem using paired t-tests.Findings Students took fewer steps to solve the problem in reflective sessions than in Usual Debugging Sessions (4.33 vs 8.04) and they made half as many syntax errors, logic errors, and runtime errors. However, they took more time between runs.Implications This paper provides evidence that requiring reflection in autograding systems can improve student debugging skills.KEYWORDS: Reflective debuggingintroductory programming classesonline IDEactionable learning analyticsauto gradersnovice programming Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical approvalThis study was done in accordance with the university IRB with reference #15041.Data availability statementThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24188010","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135538425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coding attitudes of fourth-grade latinx students during distance learning 远程学习中四年级拉丁语学生的编码态度
IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2237366
Leiny Garcia, M. Parker, M. Warschauer
{"title":"Coding attitudes of fourth-grade latinx students during distance learning","authors":"Leiny Garcia, M. Parker, M. Warschauer","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2237366","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2237366","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46007788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The applications of machine learning in computational thinking assessments: a scoping review 机器学习在计算思维评估中的应用:范围界定综述
IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2245687
Bin Tan, Hao-Yue Jin, M. Cutumisu
{"title":"The applications of machine learning in computational thinking assessments: a scoping review","authors":"Bin Tan, Hao-Yue Jin, M. Cutumisu","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2245687","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2245687","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46752856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mitogen-Activated Pathway Kinase Inhibitor-Associated Retinopathy: Do Features Differ with Upstream versus Downstream Inhibition? 丝裂原活化通路激酶抑制剂相关视网膜病变:上游抑制与下游抑制的特征是否不同?
IF 1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-08 DOI: 10.1159/000529127
Jasmine H Francis, William Foulsham, Julia Canestraro, James J Harding, Eli L Diamond, Alexander Drilon, David H Abramson

Introduction: Many cancers have derangement of the mitogen-activated pathway kinase (MAPK), making this pathway blockade a therapeutic target. However, inhibitors of MAPK can result in adverse effects including retinopathy. This study compares clinical and morphological characteristics of serous retinal disturbances in patients taking agents with variable inhibition of MAPK: either direct interference of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) or extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitors or with indirect inhibition via interference with FGFR signaling.

Methods: This retrospective observational study of prospectively collected pooled data is from a single tertiary oncology referral center. Of 339 patients receiving MAPK inhibitors (171, 107, and 61 on FGFR, MEK, and ERK inhibitors, respectively) for treatment of metastatic cancer, this study included 128 eyes of 65 patients with evidence of retinopathy confirmed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The main outcome was characteristics of treatment-emergent choroid/retinal OCT abnormalities as compared to baseline OCT.

Results: In all patients on one of three drug classes (FGFRi, MEKi, ERKi), the retinopathy manifested as subretinal fluid foci that were bilateral, fovea involving, and reversible without intervention. There were notable differences between the three classes of drugs: the proportion of patients with retinopathy, number of fluid foci per eye, proportion of eyes with intraretinal edema, and the proportion of symptomatic patients was least for the upstream target (FGFR inhibitors) and greatest for the downstream targets (MEK or ERK inhibitors).

Conclusion: This study shows MAPK pathway inhibitors may cause subretinal fluid foci with unique clinical and morphological characteristics depending on the target (FGFR, MEK, or ERK) implicated. Retinopathy is more common, more symptomatic, and more severe (more fluid foci, more expansive fluid configurations) the further downstream the MAPK pathway is inhibited.

导言:许多癌症都存在丝裂原活化通路激酶(MAPK)失调的问题,因此阻断这一通路成为治疗目标。然而,MAPK抑制剂可能导致包括视网膜病变在内的不良反应。本研究比较了服用对MAPK有不同抑制作用的药物(直接干扰丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激酶(MEK)或细胞外信号调节激酶(ERK)抑制剂,或通过干扰表皮生长因子受体(FGFR)信号转导间接抑制)的患者浆液性视网膜病变的临床和形态学特征:这项回顾性观察研究是对一家三级肿瘤转诊中心前瞻性收集的汇总数据进行的研究。在接受 MAPK 抑制剂(FGFR、MEK 和 ERK 抑制剂分别为 171、107 和 61 例)治疗转移性癌症的 339 例患者中,本研究纳入了 65 例经光学相干断层扫描(OCT)证实有视网膜病变证据的患者的 128 只眼睛。主要结果是与基线 OCT 相比,治疗引起的脉络膜/视网膜 OCT 异常的特征:所有接受三类药物(FGFRi、MEKi、ERKi)治疗的患者,视网膜病变均表现为双侧视网膜下积液灶,累及眼窝,无需干预即可逆转。三类药物之间存在显著差异:上游靶点(表皮生长因子受体抑制剂)的视网膜病变患者比例、每只眼睛的积液灶数量、视网膜内水肿的眼睛比例以及有症状患者的比例最小,而下游靶点(MEK或ERK抑制剂)的比例最大:本研究表明,MAPK通路抑制剂可能会导致视网膜下积液灶,并根据所涉及的靶点(表皮生长因子受体、MEK或ERK)而具有独特的临床和形态特征。MAPK通路越往下游,视网膜病变越常见、症状越严重(积液灶越多、积液形态越复杂)。
{"title":"Mitogen-Activated Pathway Kinase Inhibitor-Associated Retinopathy: Do Features Differ with Upstream versus Downstream Inhibition?","authors":"Jasmine H Francis, William Foulsham, Julia Canestraro, James J Harding, Eli L Diamond, Alexander Drilon, David H Abramson","doi":"10.1159/000529127","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000529127","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many cancers have derangement of the mitogen-activated pathway kinase (MAPK), making this pathway blockade a therapeutic target. However, inhibitors of MAPK can result in adverse effects including retinopathy. This study compares clinical and morphological characteristics of serous retinal disturbances in patients taking agents with variable inhibition of MAPK: either direct interference of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) or extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitors or with indirect inhibition via interference with FGFR signaling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study of prospectively collected pooled data is from a single tertiary oncology referral center. Of 339 patients receiving MAPK inhibitors (171, 107, and 61 on FGFR, MEK, and ERK inhibitors, respectively) for treatment of metastatic cancer, this study included 128 eyes of 65 patients with evidence of retinopathy confirmed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The main outcome was characteristics of treatment-emergent choroid/retinal OCT abnormalities as compared to baseline OCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all patients on one of three drug classes (FGFRi, MEKi, ERKi), the retinopathy manifested as subretinal fluid foci that were bilateral, fovea involving, and reversible without intervention. There were notable differences between the three classes of drugs: the proportion of patients with retinopathy, number of fluid foci per eye, proportion of eyes with intraretinal edema, and the proportion of symptomatic patients was least for the upstream target (FGFR inhibitors) and greatest for the downstream targets (MEK or ERK inhibitors).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows MAPK pathway inhibitors may cause subretinal fluid foci with unique clinical and morphological characteristics depending on the target (FGFR, MEK, or ERK) implicated. Retinopathy is more common, more symptomatic, and more severe (more fluid foci, more expansive fluid configurations) the further downstream the MAPK pathway is inhibited.</p>","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10821790/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74904354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do students feel and collaborate during programming activities in the productive failure paradigm? 在生产性失败范式下,学生在编程活动中的感受和协作如何?
IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-07-29 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2237365
Zachary M. Savelson, Kasia Muldner
{"title":"How do students feel and collaborate during programming activities in the productive failure paradigm?","authors":"Zachary M. Savelson, Kasia Muldner","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2237365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2237365","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44325229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Design and use of domain-specific programming platforms: interdisciplinary computational thinking with EarSketch and TunePad 特定领域编程平台的设计和使用:EarSchetch和TunePad的跨学科计算思维
IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2240657
Christopher Petrie
{"title":"Design and use of domain-specific programming platforms: interdisciplinary computational thinking with EarSketch and TunePad","authors":"Christopher Petrie","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2240657","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2240657","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42971909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial 编辑
IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2251331
Brian Dorn, Jan Vahrenhold
This issue of Computer Science Education is themed around collaboration. With technological advances bringing remote collaboration to K-12 classrooms and higher education on a broad scale, educators and researchers face new challenges and questions. The six papers in this issue address quite different aspects, and we hope that you will enjoy these perspectives just as we did. Schulz, Berndt, and Hawlitschek open this issue with a qualitative study on how educators and learners experience teamwork in teaching and learning arrangements. In their article Exploring students’ and lecturers’ views on collaboration and cooperation in computer science courses – a qualitative analysis, they present results of their analysis of a set of semi-structured interviews with participants from three German universities. Findings include that most students preferred teamwork, and the few risks they mentioned were related to different levels of skills and engagement within a team. Instructors, on the other hand, were concerned about the effectiveness of students’ learning of technical content and about assessing teamwork, an indicator that research results and best practices regarding collaborative learning have not been as widely received as one might hope for. Some criticism raised by students addressed lower levels of support from instructors than was considered to be needed and technical problems with tools. With respect to this latter point, we note that this study was conducted at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, so teaching and learning environments may have changed since then. It will be interesting to compare this snapshot to lived experiences during and after this disruption. Starting with a focus on young learners, the second article in this issue, Developing computational thinking collaboratively: the nexus of computational practices within small groups by Huang and Parker investigates collaborative learning in a middle school context. In their qualitative analysis of video observations, the authors study how middle school students engage with activities aimed at fostering Computational Thinking over the course of a five-week curriculum. Their work was driven by the observation that Computational Thinking practices and collaborative learning align well and, thus, several activities from the Creative Computing curriculum were adapted to leverage this connection. This study indicates that individual students can indeed acquire Computational Thinking practices when working in small groups; this can be seen as a response to one of the concerns documented in Schulz et al.’s article discussed above. Huang and Parker also provide vignettes documenting middle schoolers’ leveraging Computational Thinking practices while developing a solution to a given task as well as while testing and debugging their solution. These vignettes can serve as points of reference for future studies in this emerging area of research. Moving on to higher education, the work of H
本期《计算机科学教育》的主题是合作。随着技术进步将远程协作带到K-12教室和高等教育的大范围,教育工作者和研究人员面临着新的挑战和问题。本期的六篇论文涉及不同的方面,我们希望你能像我们一样喜欢这些观点。Schulz、Berndt和Hawlitschek通过一项关于教育者和学习者如何在教学安排中体验团队合作的定性研究打开了这个问题。在他们的文章《探讨学生和讲师对计算机科学课程中协作与合作的看法——定性分析》中,他们展示了对来自三所德国大学的参与者进行的一组半结构化访谈的分析结果。调查结果包括,大多数学生更喜欢团队合作,他们提到的少数风险与团队中不同的技能水平和参与度有关。另一方面,教师关心的是学生学习技术内容的有效性和对团队合作的评估,这表明关于合作学习的研究成果和最佳实践并没有像人们希望的那样得到广泛接受。学生提出的一些批评涉及教师的支持水平低于认为需要的水平,以及工具的技术问题。关于后一点,我们注意到这项研究是在COVID-19大流行开始时进行的,因此教学环境可能在那时发生了变化。将这个快照与中断期间和之后的生活经历进行比较将会很有趣。从关注年轻学习者开始,本期的第二篇文章,发展计算思维协作:小团体中计算实践的联系,由Huang和Parker研究了中学背景下的协作学习。在对视频观察的定性分析中,作者研究了中学生在为期五周的课程中如何参与旨在培养计算思维的活动。他们的工作是由于观察到计算思维实践和协作学习很好地结合在一起,因此,创造性计算课程中的一些活动被改编为利用这种联系。本研究表明,个体学生确实可以在小组学习中获得计算思维练习;这可以看作是对上面讨论的Schulz等人的文章中所记录的一个问题的回应。黄和帕克还提供了一些小插曲,记录了中学生在为给定任务开发解决方案以及测试和调试解决方案时利用计算思维实践的情况。这些小插曲可以作为这一新兴研究领域未来研究的参考点。在高等教育方面,Hawlitschek、Dietrich和Zug的工作与Schulz等人的定性研究的一个发现有关。论文《计算机科学教育的影响》,第33卷,第2023期。3,315 - 317 https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2251331
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"Brian Dorn, Jan Vahrenhold","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2023.2251331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2251331","url":null,"abstract":"This issue of Computer Science Education is themed around collaboration. With technological advances bringing remote collaboration to K-12 classrooms and higher education on a broad scale, educators and researchers face new challenges and questions. The six papers in this issue address quite different aspects, and we hope that you will enjoy these perspectives just as we did. Schulz, Berndt, and Hawlitschek open this issue with a qualitative study on how educators and learners experience teamwork in teaching and learning arrangements. In their article Exploring students’ and lecturers’ views on collaboration and cooperation in computer science courses – a qualitative analysis, they present results of their analysis of a set of semi-structured interviews with participants from three German universities. Findings include that most students preferred teamwork, and the few risks they mentioned were related to different levels of skills and engagement within a team. Instructors, on the other hand, were concerned about the effectiveness of students’ learning of technical content and about assessing teamwork, an indicator that research results and best practices regarding collaborative learning have not been as widely received as one might hope for. Some criticism raised by students addressed lower levels of support from instructors than was considered to be needed and technical problems with tools. With respect to this latter point, we note that this study was conducted at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, so teaching and learning environments may have changed since then. It will be interesting to compare this snapshot to lived experiences during and after this disruption. Starting with a focus on young learners, the second article in this issue, Developing computational thinking collaboratively: the nexus of computational practices within small groups by Huang and Parker investigates collaborative learning in a middle school context. In their qualitative analysis of video observations, the authors study how middle school students engage with activities aimed at fostering Computational Thinking over the course of a five-week curriculum. Their work was driven by the observation that Computational Thinking practices and collaborative learning align well and, thus, several activities from the Creative Computing curriculum were adapted to leverage this connection. This study indicates that individual students can indeed acquire Computational Thinking practices when working in small groups; this can be seen as a response to one of the concerns documented in Schulz et al.’s article discussed above. Huang and Parker also provide vignettes documenting middle schoolers’ leveraging Computational Thinking practices while developing a solution to a given task as well as while testing and debugging their solution. These vignettes can serve as points of reference for future studies in this emerging area of research. Moving on to higher education, the work of H","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"315 - 317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47296727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Computer Science Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1