HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY最新文献

There is growing interest in understanding home health utilization and outcomes for those with cognitive impairment (CI). Yet, approaches to measuring CI during home health vary widely across studies, with little known regarding potential implications for findings. Among a nationally representative sample of community-living Medicare beneficiaries receiving home health (2011-2016), we compare estimated CI prevalence using four different measures and evaluate measure-specific strengths and limitations. CI prevalence estimates ranged from 18.4% of the sample with probable dementia from national survey data; to 27.8% with diagnosed dementia, from Medicare claims; to 26.7% with memory deficit and/or impaired decision-making and 43.9% with reduced cognitive function, from OASIS. Researchers must be deliberate in their choice of CI measure and transparent regarding its benefits and limitations. Regardless of the measure used, a sizable percentage of home health patients have CI, supporting the importance of ongoing research in this area.

State Medicaid programs are the largest source of funding for long-term services and supports (LTSS). We characterized states across quartiles of mean LTSS spending for individuals ≥65 and used the Health and Retirement Study to examine the demographic, functional, and caregiving characteristics across these quartiles. Individuals in states with lower Medicaid spending on LTSS reported more family and friend caregiving hours and were more likely to be from racial and ethnic minority groups. Continued work is needed to improve Medicaid LTSS policy to better support vulnerable populations, particularly in lower quartile states.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults experienced great levels of social isolation and feelings of loneliness. We developed a telephone reassurance program, Caring Callers, to provide a weekly phone call to socially isolated older adults. Dyads were created which comprised of a Senior Companion volunteer and a homebound older adult. Using a mixed methods approach, we examined the program's impact on homebound older adults. The participants were satisfied with the program and showed a significant increase in overall health. They discussed social and emotional benefits of the program and other benefits that they gained from community resources. Due to the vulnerability of the participants, this telephone-based intervention seemed feasible without technological barriers. It is critical that aging service providers recognize the resourcefulness and relatability of older adult volunteers and utilize them to continue to support socially isolated older adults during an unprecedented event affecting people's isolation.

In 2016, in Switzerland, we implemented transitional interprofessional and interinstitutional shared decision-making processes (IIPs) between a short-stay inpatient care unit (SSU) and primary care professionals. Between 2018 and 2019, we evaluated this intervention using a realist design to answer the following questions: for whom, with whom, in which context and how have IIPs been implemented? Our initial theory was tested via interviews with patients, primary care professionals and staff from the SSU. Results showed that a patient's stay at the SSU, with actors committed to facilitating IIPs, reinforced the perceived appropriateness and implementation of those IIPs. However, this appropriateness varied according to different contextual elements, such as the complexity of needs, preexisting collaborative practices and the purpose of the inpatient stay. Since IIPs occurred in a context of fragmented practices, proactive and sustained efforts are required of the actors implementing them and the organizations supporting them.

To investigate the association of ownership status, discharge rate and length of stay (LOS) of home health care (HH) services under the prospective payment system (PPS). We used 2016-2018 Outcome Assessment and Information Set (OASIS) data sets for Medicare beneficiaries. Two outcome variables were investigated: rate of discharge from an HH agency and LOS. Our main independent variable was ownership status: for-profit (FP) versus not-for-profit (NFP). FP agencies were 4.2% (p <.01) less likely to discharge patients to the community but more likely (7.3%; p <.001) to have longer LOS (>99 days) compared to NFPs. Findings that FP agencies were less likely to discharge patients to the community and more likely to have a longer length of stay than NFP agencies have implications for quality of care initiatives by the Medicare Post-Acute Transformation Act 2014.

The Care Transitions Intervention (CTI) is an evidence-based intervention aimed at supporting the transition from hospital back to the community for patients to ultimately reduce preventable re-hospitalization. In a pilot randomized controlled trial, we examined the preliminary effectiveness of an Enhanced Care Transitions Intervention (ECTI), CTI with the addition of peer support, for a racially/ethnically diverse sample of older adults (age 60+) with co-morbid major depression. We observed a significant decline in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after being discharged from the hospital among those who received CTI. Additionally, those who received ECTI either maintained HRQOL scores, or, saw improvement in HRQOL scores. Findings suggest the Enhanced Care Transitions Intervention can maintain or improve HRQOL and reduce disparities for older participants from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds with clinical depression.

The aim was to investigate the views of stakeholders on the practical relevance of a broad quality of life (QoL) outcome tool for care in older adults: the Extended Quality of Life Tool (EQLT). We conducted individual interviews and focus groups with a variety of stakeholders involved in the care for older adults which were analyzed using a framework analysis. Stakeholders considered relevant: focus on the client perspective; perspective on QoL broader than health; the possibility to take diversity into account; and the possibility to determine a minimum level of QoL. Three facilitators for implementation of the tool were mentioned as well as four barriers. The EQLT can support conversations with clients about their needs and wishes, thus enabling decisions about care services based on a broad set of domains of QoL. Implementation of the tool should take into account the facilitators and barriers identified in the current study.