Pub Date : 2022-07-13DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2091009
Seth Villegas
Barbour, I. (2000). When science meets religion. Harper San Francisco. Cantor, G., & Kenny, C. (2001). Barbour’s fourfold way: Problems with his taxonomy of science-religion relationships. Zygon, 36(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00395 Gould, S. J. (2002). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. Ballantine Books. Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. Chatto & Windus. Huxley, A. (1962). Island. Chatto & Windus. Marx, K. (1994 [1844]). A contribution to the critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right: Introduction. In J. O’Malley (Ed.), Marx: Early political writings (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought, pp. 57–70). Cambridge University Press. Schermer, M. H. (2007). Brave new world versus island–utopian and dystopian views on psychopharmacology. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 10(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9059-1 Wildman, W. J., & Stockly, K. J. (2021). Spirit tech: The brave new world of consciousness hacking and enlightenment engineering. St Martin’s Press.
{"title":"A typology for understanding the usage and intentions of Spirit Tech consumers","authors":"Seth Villegas","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2091009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2091009","url":null,"abstract":"Barbour, I. (2000). When science meets religion. Harper San Francisco. Cantor, G., & Kenny, C. (2001). Barbour’s fourfold way: Problems with his taxonomy of science-religion relationships. Zygon, 36(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00395 Gould, S. J. (2002). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. Ballantine Books. Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. Chatto & Windus. Huxley, A. (1962). Island. Chatto & Windus. Marx, K. (1994 [1844]). A contribution to the critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right: Introduction. In J. O’Malley (Ed.), Marx: Early political writings (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought, pp. 57–70). Cambridge University Press. Schermer, M. H. (2007). Brave new world versus island–utopian and dystopian views on psychopharmacology. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 10(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9059-1 Wildman, W. J., & Stockly, K. J. (2021). Spirit tech: The brave new world of consciousness hacking and enlightenment engineering. St Martin’s Press.","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74427752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-13DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2091005
Linda A. Mercadante
Technology and spirituality are areas rarely researched together. But that is what Wesley Wildman and Kate Stockly have done in Spirit Tech: The Brave New World of Consciousness Hacking and Enlightenment Engineering (Wildman & Stockly, 2021) . The book is practically a product review of new and more e ffi cient ways to gain spiritual experience, even if the essence of this experience is not fi rmly fi xed. No matter, the book insists we are entering a brave new world where consciousness can be “ hacked ” and “ enlightenment ” engineered.
{"title":"Spiritual but not religious (SBNRs) and theists encounter spirit tech","authors":"Linda A. Mercadante","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2091005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2091005","url":null,"abstract":"Technology and spirituality are areas rarely researched together. But that is what Wesley Wildman and Kate Stockly have done in Spirit Tech: The Brave New World of Consciousness Hacking and Enlightenment Engineering (Wildman & Stockly, 2021) . The book is practically a product review of new and more e ffi cient ways to gain spiritual experience, even if the essence of this experience is not fi rmly fi xed. No matter, the book insists we are entering a brave new world where consciousness can be “ hacked ” and “ enlightenment ” engineered.","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78163144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-06DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070256
Amelia A. McNamara
factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 Flora, D. B., LaBrish, C., & Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Old and new ideas for data screening and assumption testing for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012. 00055 Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Aczel, B., Aditya, Y., Alayan, A. J., Allen, P. J., Altay, S., Alzahawi, S., Amir, Y., Anthony, F.-V., Appiah, O. K., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Balkaya-Ince, M., Balsamo, M., Banker, S., Bartoš, F., Becerra, M., Beffara, B., Beitner, J., Bendixen, T.,...Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2153599X.2022.2070255 Lodder, P., Denollet, J., Emons, W. H., Nefs, G., Pouwer, F., Speight, J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2019). Modeling interactions between latent variables in research on Type D personality: A monte carlo simulation and clinical study of depression and anxiety. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(5), 637–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00273171.2018.1562863 Lodder, P., Emons, W. H., Denollet, J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2021). Latent logistic interaction modeling: A simulation and empirical illustration of Type D personality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(3), 440–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1838905 Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553 Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, PÉ, & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315 Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159 Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832
{"title":"The impact (or lack thereof) of analysis choice on conclusions with Likert data from the Many Analysts Religion Project","authors":"Amelia A. McNamara","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070256","url":null,"abstract":"factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 Flora, D. B., LaBrish, C., & Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Old and new ideas for data screening and assumption testing for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012. 00055 Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Aczel, B., Aditya, Y., Alayan, A. J., Allen, P. J., Altay, S., Alzahawi, S., Amir, Y., Anthony, F.-V., Appiah, O. K., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Balkaya-Ince, M., Balsamo, M., Banker, S., Bartoš, F., Becerra, M., Beffara, B., Beitner, J., Bendixen, T.,...Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2153599X.2022.2070255 Lodder, P., Denollet, J., Emons, W. H., Nefs, G., Pouwer, F., Speight, J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2019). Modeling interactions between latent variables in research on Type D personality: A monte carlo simulation and clinical study of depression and anxiety. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(5), 637–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00273171.2018.1562863 Lodder, P., Emons, W. H., Denollet, J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2021). Latent logistic interaction modeling: A simulation and empirical illustration of Type D personality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(3), 440–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1838905 Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553 Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, PÉ, & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315 Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159 Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85533752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-06DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070266
K. K. Himawan, I. Martoyo, Eunike M. Himawan, Yonathan Aditya, Christiany Suwartono
The role and mechanism that religion plays in an individual ’ s life as suggested by many international studies might be substantially di ff erent with the one practiced in Indonesia. Studies in the United States and Europe have discovered a gradual decline of religiosity (Twenge et al., 2016). Nevertheless, Indonesians still adhere to their religious a ffi liations and consider religions to play an important role in determining their well-being (Tamir et al., 2020). While studies continue to show the positive contribution of religion to an individual ’ s well-being (i
许多国际研究表明，宗教在个人生活中所起的作用和机制可能与印度尼西亚的情况大不相同。美国和欧洲的研究发现宗教虔诚度逐渐下降(Twenge et al.， 2016)。尽管如此，印尼人仍然坚持自己的宗教信仰，并认为宗教在决定他们的福祉方面发挥着重要作用(Tamir et al.， 2020)。虽然研究继续显示宗教对个人幸福的积极贡献(例如
{"title":"Religion and well-being in Indonesia: exploring the role of religion in a society where being atheist is not an option","authors":"K. K. Himawan, I. Martoyo, Eunike M. Himawan, Yonathan Aditya, Christiany Suwartono","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070266","url":null,"abstract":"The role and mechanism that religion plays in an individual ’ s life as suggested by many international studies might be substantially di ff erent with the one practiced in Indonesia. Studies in the United States and Europe have discovered a gradual decline of religiosity (Twenge et al., 2016). Nevertheless, Indonesians still adhere to their religious a ffi liations and consider religions to play an important role in determining their well-being (Tamir et al., 2020). While studies continue to show the positive contribution of religion to an individual ’ s well-being (i","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88781059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-06DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070251
Q. Atkinson, Scott Claessens, K. Fischer, G. L. Forsyth, Thanos Kyritsis, K. Wiebels, David Moreau
Cross-cultural research involves the systematic study of psychological processes across di ff erent cultures to understand similarities and di ff erences in human behavior as they are in fl uenced by cultural context (Matsumoto & Juang, 2017). Cross-cultural research o ff ers key advantages for informing theories on individual and cultural sources of variation in human behavior because of
{"title":"Being specific about generalisability","authors":"Q. Atkinson, Scott Claessens, K. Fischer, G. L. Forsyth, Thanos Kyritsis, K. Wiebels, David Moreau","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070251","url":null,"abstract":"Cross-cultural research involves the systematic study of psychological processes across di ff erent cultures to understand similarities and di ff erences in human behavior as they are in fl uenced by cultural context (Matsumoto & Juang, 2017). Cross-cultural research o ff ers key advantages for informing theories on individual and cultural sources of variation in human behavior because of","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85201413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-06DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070257
Chris-Gabriel Islam, J. Lorenz
This comment aims at one attribute that leaves room for improvement of the generally well-thought-out many-analysts-religion-project (MARP) approach (Hoogeveen, et al., 2022): All teams used only one data set. We present our analyses based on an extended database, referring to literature on replicability and the relationship between religiosity and well-being before ending with recommendations for future projects of this kind. The MARP approach will give new insights into the challenge of replicability of research fi ndings inherent to every project that is carried out by only one researcher or research group. What remains is the problem of drawing reliable conclusions based on only one data set. One data set might always be prone to selection bias and it might lack representativity as well as potentially important variables that were not collected. In order to argue for a robust e ff ect between well-being and religiosity, the e ff ect should be still measurable when interchanging the collected data with other survey data or when adding additional variables, including from other data sets, in order to avoid omitted variable bias. In economics, Clemens (2017) presents a classi fi cation for replication studies, which distinguishes among four types of replication and robustness checks: veri fi cation, reproduction, reanalysis, and extension (see Table 1). If we classify the MARP approach according to this classi fi cation scheme, we would consider it a robustness check of the reanalysis type. The participating researchers used the same population, although they speci fi ed their samples and analytical models di ff erently. To achieve a replication of the studies within MARP, any researcher could use the published analysis scripts and repeat the analyses with the same or another sample.
{"title":"Commentary to MARP: how to increase the robustness of survey studies","authors":"Chris-Gabriel Islam, J. Lorenz","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070257","url":null,"abstract":"This comment aims at one attribute that leaves room for improvement of the generally well-thought-out many-analysts-religion-project (MARP) approach (Hoogeveen, et al., 2022): All teams used only one data set. We present our analyses based on an extended database, referring to literature on replicability and the relationship between religiosity and well-being before ending with recommendations for future projects of this kind. The MARP approach will give new insights into the challenge of replicability of research fi ndings inherent to every project that is carried out by only one researcher or research group. What remains is the problem of drawing reliable conclusions based on only one data set. One data set might always be prone to selection bias and it might lack representativity as well as potentially important variables that were not collected. In order to argue for a robust e ff ect between well-being and religiosity, the e ff ect should be still measurable when interchanging the collected data with other survey data or when adding additional variables, including from other data sets, in order to avoid omitted variable bias. In economics, Clemens (2017) presents a classi fi cation for replication studies, which distinguishes among four types of replication and robustness checks: veri fi cation, reproduction, reanalysis, and extension (see Table 1). If we classify the MARP approach according to this classi fi cation scheme, we would consider it a robustness check of the reanalysis type. The participating researchers used the same population, although they speci fi ed their samples and analytical models di ff erently. To achieve a replication of the studies within MARP, any researcher could use the published analysis scripts and repeat the analyses with the same or another sample.","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84004134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-06DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070248
R. M. Ross, J. Sulik, J. Buczny, Bruno Schivinski
The Many Analysts Religion Project (MARP; Hoogeveen et al., 2022) asked analysts to compare the relationship between religiosity and well-being across many di ff erent countries. Although this project makes a valuable e ff ort towards improving our understanding of the psychology of religion, we highlight two measurement issues that should be considered when interpreting the results of the MARP
许多分析家宗教项目;hoogevenen et al.， 2022)要求分析师比较许多不同国家的宗教信仰与幸福之间的关系。虽然这个项目为提高我们对宗教心理学的理解做出了有价值的努力，但我们强调了在解释MARP结果时应该考虑的两个测量问题
{"title":"Many analysts and few incentives","authors":"R. M. Ross, J. Sulik, J. Buczny, Bruno Schivinski","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070248","url":null,"abstract":"The Many Analysts Religion Project (MARP; Hoogeveen et al., 2022) asked analysts to compare the relationship between religiosity and well-being across many di ff erent countries. Although this project makes a valuable e ff ort towards improving our understanding of the psychology of religion, we highlight two measurement issues that should be considered when interpreting the results of the MARP","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82870592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-06DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070260
M. R. Schreiner, Brett Mercier, Susanne Frick, Dylan Wiwad, Marcel C. Schmitt, J. Kelly, Julian Quevedo Pütter
The Many Analysts Religion Project (MARP; Hoogeveen et al., 2022) asked analysts to compare the relationship between religiosity and well-being across many di ff erent countries. Although this project makes a valuable e ff ort towards improving our understanding of the psychology of religion, we highlight two measurement issues that should be considered when interpreting the results of the MARP
许多分析家宗教项目;hoogevenen et al.， 2022)要求分析师比较许多不同国家的宗教信仰与幸福之间的关系。虽然这个项目为提高我们对宗教心理学的理解做出了有价值的努力，但我们强调了在解释MARP结果时应该考虑的两个测量问题
{"title":"Measurement issues in the many analysts religion project","authors":"M. R. Schreiner, Brett Mercier, Susanne Frick, Dylan Wiwad, Marcel C. Schmitt, J. Kelly, Julian Quevedo Pütter","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070260","url":null,"abstract":"The Many Analysts Religion Project (MARP; Hoogeveen et al., 2022) asked analysts to compare the relationship between religiosity and well-being across many di ff erent countries. Although this project makes a valuable e ff ort towards improving our understanding of the psychology of religion, we highlight two measurement issues that should be considered when interpreting the results of the MARP","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79558324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-06DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070250
P. Lodder
associations between latent variables
潜在变量之间的关联
{"title":"Why researchers should not ignore measurement error and skewness in questionnaire item scores","authors":"P. Lodder","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070250","url":null,"abstract":"associations between latent variables","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72698951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-06DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070265
Hannah I. Pearson, Ronda F. Lo, Joni Y. Sasaki
Day, A. (2011). Believing in belonging: Belief and social identity in the modern world. Oxford University Press. Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2018). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (5th ed.). Guilford Press. Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Aczel, B., Aditya, Y., Alayan, A. J., Allen, P. J., Altay, S., Alzahawi, S., Amir, Y., Anthony, F.-V., Appiah, O. K., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Balkaya-Ince, M., Balsamo, M., Banker, S., Bartoš, F., Becerra, M., Beffara, B., Beitner, J., Bendixen, T.,...Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2153599X.2022.2070255 Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2016). Computation of effect sizes. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html Murphy, J. (2017). Beyond “religion” and “spirituality”. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 39(1), 1–26. https://doi. org/10.1163/15736121-12341335 Oman, D. (2013). Defining religion and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian, & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed (pp. 3–22). Guilford Publications. Paloutzian, R. F. (2017). Invitation to the psychology of religion (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). Sage Publications. Speed, D., & Hwang, K. (2019). Heretic, heal thyself! atheism, nonreligion, and health. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000158 Speed, D., & Lamont, A. (2021). (Life) satisfaction guaranteed? Subjective well-being attenuates religious attendance– life satisfaction association. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10. 1037/rel0000443
{"title":"How do culture and religion interact worldwide? A cultural match approach to understanding religiosity and well-being in the Many Analysts Religion Project","authors":"Hannah I. Pearson, Ronda F. Lo, Joni Y. Sasaki","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070265","url":null,"abstract":"Day, A. (2011). Believing in belonging: Belief and social identity in the modern world. Oxford University Press. Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2018). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (5th ed.). Guilford Press. Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Aczel, B., Aditya, Y., Alayan, A. J., Allen, P. J., Altay, S., Alzahawi, S., Amir, Y., Anthony, F.-V., Appiah, O. K., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Balkaya-Ince, M., Balsamo, M., Banker, S., Bartoš, F., Becerra, M., Beffara, B., Beitner, J., Bendixen, T.,...Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2153599X.2022.2070255 Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2016). Computation of effect sizes. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html Murphy, J. (2017). Beyond “religion” and “spirituality”. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 39(1), 1–26. https://doi. org/10.1163/15736121-12341335 Oman, D. (2013). Defining religion and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian, & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed (pp. 3–22). Guilford Publications. Paloutzian, R. F. (2017). Invitation to the psychology of religion (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). Sage Publications. Speed, D., & Hwang, K. (2019). Heretic, heal thyself! atheism, nonreligion, and health. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000158 Speed, D., & Lamont, A. (2021). (Life) satisfaction guaranteed? Subjective well-being attenuates religious attendance– life satisfaction association. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10. 1037/rel0000443","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73807722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：