Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2198157
Rebecca G Mirick, Stephanie P Wladkowski
In 2020, hospices supported 1.72 million Medicare patients and their caregivers. The end-of-life experience can be difficult for caregivers and many experience anxiety, depression, and suicidality. Little literature has explored the role of hospice social workers in addressing and treating caregivers' suicidal thoughts and behaviors. This paper will explore the topic of hospice caregiver suicide, using a case study to illustrate relevant issues, practices, and needs. Implications for hospice social work practice are included.
{"title":"Suicide and Hospice Caregivers: A Case Study.","authors":"Rebecca G Mirick, Stephanie P Wladkowski","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2198157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2198157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2020, hospices supported 1.72 million Medicare patients and their caregivers. The end-of-life experience can be difficult for caregivers and many experience anxiety, depression, and suicidality. Little literature has explored the role of hospice social workers in addressing and treating caregivers' suicidal thoughts and behaviors. This paper will explore the topic of hospice caregiver suicide, using a case study to illustrate relevant issues, practices, and needs. Implications for hospice social work practice are included.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 2","pages":"93-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10033246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2198158
Schuyler C Cunningham, Anne Keleman, Rachel Brandon, Hunter Groninger, Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc
Guided by the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, this study explored relationships between cardiac related psychosocial distress, traumatic distress, and the number of lifetime traumas in people with advanced heart failure. Utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, a convenience sample of participants with advanced heart failure who received treatment in Washington, DC, completed standardized measures. Bivariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in mean number of exposures and distress associated with advanced heart failure therapies and linear relationships between exposures and traumatic distress, distress and traumatic distress, and exposures and distress, as well as between the number of exposures and distress and traumatic distress and between the distress and traumatic distress. Multivariate analysis suggested that the higher the number of reported traumatic events, the higher the distress, and the higher the distress, the higher the traumatic distress. Social workers and allied team members should consider how a patient's distress relates to traumatic distress in the advanced stage heart failure population.
{"title":"Cardiac Related Psychosocial Distress and Traumatic Distress in Individuals with Advanced Heart Failure.","authors":"Schuyler C Cunningham, Anne Keleman, Rachel Brandon, Hunter Groninger, Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2198158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2198158","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guided by the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, this study explored relationships between cardiac related psychosocial distress, traumatic distress, and the number of lifetime traumas in people with advanced heart failure. Utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, a convenience sample of participants with advanced heart failure who received treatment in Washington, DC, completed standardized measures. Bivariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in mean number of exposures and distress associated with advanced heart failure therapies and linear relationships between exposures and traumatic distress, distress and traumatic distress, and exposures and distress, as well as between the number of exposures and distress and traumatic distress and between the distress and traumatic distress. Multivariate analysis suggested that the higher the number of reported traumatic events, the higher the distress, and the higher the distress, the higher the traumatic distress. Social workers and allied team members should consider how a patient's distress relates to traumatic distress in the advanced stage heart failure population.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 2","pages":"103-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10033244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2222963
Ellen L Csikai
Welcome to another issue! Each in a different way, the authors in this issue together present a focus on difficult medical/social situations that may cause distress in the individual or caregivers and thus lead toward a lessening of quality of life at the end of life. These articles show the value of taking into consideration that traumatic experiences happen in everyday lives While suicide among hospice recipients has received some attention in the literature, suicide and suicidal thoughts among hospice caregivers has not. Primary among the difficulties with focusing on this topic is the fact that most receive hospice care for a very short time. The first article, by Mirick and Wladkowski, takes us through a case study presenting a step-by-step recognition of the issues involved and recommendations for how social workers can best utilize prevention techniques and intervene as necessary. The first among these is universal screening for suicidality. Social workers may also engage in providing resources, safety planning, supportive contacts, including following death of the care recipient and continue their own training and awareness of suicidality. Cunningham et al. explored psychosocial distress as it related to cardiac distress in individuals with advanced heart failure and then further linked this to traumatic distress. Of course this is important as it has been well-established that psychosocial distress and traumatic distress can lead to negative health outcomes. Through a survey of individuals with advanced heart failure, multiple measures were utilized to understand distress on multiple levels and included measures of depression and anxiety. Explore the usefulness of the current measures in assessing distress in this population. They found that the number of exposures to potentially traumatic incidents, the higher the distress and then likely higher level of traumatic distress, but no predictors of it in this particular group of respondents. The authors suggest that further study is needed with this population and also examination of the usefulness of the measures for populations with advance heart disease. Next, Cagle and Brandon address the issue of social justice in palliative care. They conducted a survey of hospice and palliative care social workers’ perceptions on the meaning of social justice and how these social workers see the issue played out in their work. These social workers reported encountering many people who are disadvantaged in some way, economically, physically or intellectually, and non-English speaking as well as those who abuse substances or are homeless. All of these individuals may be at a higher risk to experience social injustices and in turn, traumatic experiences. The respondents’ defined social justice as access to basic needs, high-quality care, and education without regard to group membership. Also identified were ways to overcome barriers to access, some of which included the recognition that something active
{"title":"Editor Introduction.","authors":"Ellen L Csikai","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2222963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2222963","url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to another issue! Each in a different way, the authors in this issue together present a focus on difficult medical/social situations that may cause distress in the individual or caregivers and thus lead toward a lessening of quality of life at the end of life. These articles show the value of taking into consideration that traumatic experiences happen in everyday lives While suicide among hospice recipients has received some attention in the literature, suicide and suicidal thoughts among hospice caregivers has not. Primary among the difficulties with focusing on this topic is the fact that most receive hospice care for a very short time. The first article, by Mirick and Wladkowski, takes us through a case study presenting a step-by-step recognition of the issues involved and recommendations for how social workers can best utilize prevention techniques and intervene as necessary. The first among these is universal screening for suicidality. Social workers may also engage in providing resources, safety planning, supportive contacts, including following death of the care recipient and continue their own training and awareness of suicidality. Cunningham et al. explored psychosocial distress as it related to cardiac distress in individuals with advanced heart failure and then further linked this to traumatic distress. Of course this is important as it has been well-established that psychosocial distress and traumatic distress can lead to negative health outcomes. Through a survey of individuals with advanced heart failure, multiple measures were utilized to understand distress on multiple levels and included measures of depression and anxiety. Explore the usefulness of the current measures in assessing distress in this population. They found that the number of exposures to potentially traumatic incidents, the higher the distress and then likely higher level of traumatic distress, but no predictors of it in this particular group of respondents. The authors suggest that further study is needed with this population and also examination of the usefulness of the measures for populations with advance heart disease. Next, Cagle and Brandon address the issue of social justice in palliative care. They conducted a survey of hospice and palliative care social workers’ perceptions on the meaning of social justice and how these social workers see the issue played out in their work. These social workers reported encountering many people who are disadvantaged in some way, economically, physically or intellectually, and non-English speaking as well as those who abuse substances or are homeless. All of these individuals may be at a higher risk to experience social injustices and in turn, traumatic experiences. The respondents’ defined social justice as access to basic needs, high-quality care, and education without regard to group membership. Also identified were ways to overcome barriers to access, some of which included the recognition that something active","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 2","pages":"85-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9722521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2198674
Paul J Moon
A brief reflection of encountering four older adult women who claimed self-transformation through learning in late life grief.
四名老年妇女在晚年悲伤中声称通过学习实现自我转变的简短反思。
{"title":"Revisiting a Time of Study: Older Adults Learning Through Grieving.","authors":"Paul J Moon","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2198674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2198674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A brief reflection of encountering four older adult women who claimed self-transformation through learning in late life grief.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 2","pages":"88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9657690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2220080
Meital Simhi, Aviva Yoselis
In Israel, as in other countries, the emotional and physical needs of minority populations receiving palliative care, are largely unknown. The ultra-Orthodox Jewish sector is one such minority population. This study's goal was to identify perceived social support, desire to receive information about illness and prognosis, and willingness to disclose information to others. Various measures assessing perception of social support, psychological symptoms and information disclosure were completed. Fifty-one women consented to participate; approximately 50% of participants had disclosed the diagnosis to their rabbi or a friend, in addition to their spouse. Almost all of the participants would want to be told if their condition were worsening (86.3%), yet only 17.6% reported that their doctor had discussed future care options if their health situation were to worsen. Overall, participants felt that the level of support they received was high and reported low levels of mental distress. This is the first known study regarding perceptions and needs of ultra-Orthodox Jewish women with advanced-stage cancer. Both diagnosis disclosure and palliative care options should be addressed and discussed with these patients so they may make important end-of-life decisions.
{"title":"Support and Informational Needs of Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Women Coping with Advanced Cancer: A Pilot Observational Study.","authors":"Meital Simhi, Aviva Yoselis","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2220080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2220080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Israel, as in other countries, the emotional and physical needs of minority populations receiving palliative care, are largely unknown. The ultra-Orthodox Jewish sector is one such minority population. This study's goal was to identify perceived social support, desire to receive information about illness and prognosis, and willingness to disclose information to others. Various measures assessing perception of social support, psychological symptoms and information disclosure were completed. Fifty-one women consented to participate; approximately 50% of participants had disclosed the diagnosis to their rabbi or a friend, in addition to their spouse. Almost all of the participants would want to be told if their condition were worsening (86.3%), yet only 17.6% reported that their doctor had discussed future care options if their health situation were to worsen. Overall, participants felt that the level of support they received was high and reported low levels of mental distress. This is the first known study regarding perceptions and needs of ultra-Orthodox Jewish women with advanced-stage cancer. Both diagnosis disclosure and palliative care options should be addressed and discussed with these patients so they may make important end-of-life decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 2","pages":"150-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9660335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2220078
Bridget Amankwah, Mary Ani-Amponsah, Mustapha Mahama, Alberta Gyepi-Garbrah, Doris Richardson, Olivia Nyarko Mensah, Hannah Acquah, Dzigbordi Kpikpitse, Rasheed Ofosu-Poku
One of the common undesirable outcomes of pregnancy is perinatal loss. Healthcare systems strive to reduce the incidence of perinatal loss but typically little attention is on the experiences of bereaved mothers following perinatal loss, particularly in low and middle-income countries where such deaths are common. This research explored the lived experiences of mothers with perinatal loss in the Kumasi metropolis, Ghana. A qualitative design was used to explore the experiences of nine (9) bereaved mothers from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital's postnatal ward and the Mother and Baby Unit. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured interview guide, audio-recorded, and thematically analyzed. One major finding was that mothers restricted mourning their dead babies based on fear of recurrent perinatal loss and traditional beliefs on delayed return to fertility. Mothers blamed healthcare providers for their loss due to their concerns about care received. Gaps in communication flow from healthcare professionals to bereaved mothers were commonly identified as mothers struggled to make meaning of their loss and coped with cultural restrictions and beliefs. Healthcare professionals must explore mothers' concerns and "gut-feelings," and pay attention to their communication needs following perinatal loss.
{"title":"\"The Health Caregivers Did Not Care about Me after the Loss\": Maternal Experiences of Perinatal Loss in the Kumasi Metropolitan Area, Ghana.","authors":"Bridget Amankwah, Mary Ani-Amponsah, Mustapha Mahama, Alberta Gyepi-Garbrah, Doris Richardson, Olivia Nyarko Mensah, Hannah Acquah, Dzigbordi Kpikpitse, Rasheed Ofosu-Poku","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2220078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2220078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the common undesirable outcomes of pregnancy is perinatal loss. Healthcare systems strive to reduce the incidence of perinatal loss but typically little attention is on the experiences of bereaved mothers following perinatal loss, particularly in low and middle-income countries where such deaths are common. This research explored the lived experiences of mothers with perinatal loss in the Kumasi metropolis, Ghana. A qualitative design was used to explore the experiences of nine (9) bereaved mothers from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital's postnatal ward and the Mother and Baby Unit. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured interview guide, audio-recorded, and thematically analyzed. One major finding was that mothers restricted mourning their dead babies based on fear of recurrent perinatal loss and traditional beliefs on delayed return to fertility. Mothers blamed healthcare providers for their loss due to their concerns about care received. Gaps in communication flow from healthcare professionals to bereaved mothers were commonly identified as mothers struggled to make meaning of their loss and coped with cultural restrictions and beliefs. Healthcare professionals must explore mothers' concerns and \"gut-feelings,\" and pay attention to their communication needs following perinatal loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 2","pages":"133-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9722523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2022-10-27DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2022.2139333
Adrian E Bruton, Lindsey R Debosik, Kyle A Pitzer, Ellen L Csikai, Karla T Washington
Family caregivers of people with cancer encounter a wide range of problems including challenges managing patients' symptoms, difficulties navigating complex healthcare systems, and financial stressors associated with caregiving. Outpatient palliative care teams are ideally positioned to help caregivers respond to these challenges; however, little evidence is available to inform problem-solving support for caregivers in this setting. This article presents results from a secondary analysis of data obtained as part of a randomized clinical trial of a problem-solving intervention for family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care. It describes the extent to which caregivers report adoption of positive and negative problem orientations and use of rational, impulsive, and avoidant problem-solving styles, and examines whether these problem-solving dimensions differ by age and gender. Results reveal statistically significant negative correlations between caregiver age and positive and negative problem orientations and use of a rational problem-solving style, and statistically significant gender differences with regard to negative problem orientation and use of an impulsive problem-solving style. Findings from this exploratory study highlight unique potential strengths and needs of caregivers, and set the stage for future research on problem-solving among cancer caregivers in the growing field of outpatient palliative care.
{"title":"Problem-Solving Dimensions among Caregivers of People with Cancer Receiving Outpatient Palliative Care.","authors":"Adrian E Bruton, Lindsey R Debosik, Kyle A Pitzer, Ellen L Csikai, Karla T Washington","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2022.2139333","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15524256.2022.2139333","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family caregivers of people with cancer encounter a wide range of problems including challenges managing patients' symptoms, difficulties navigating complex healthcare systems, and financial stressors associated with caregiving. Outpatient palliative care teams are ideally positioned to help caregivers respond to these challenges; however, little evidence is available to inform problem-solving support for caregivers in this setting. This article presents results from a secondary analysis of data obtained as part of a randomized clinical trial of a problem-solving intervention for family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care. It describes the extent to which caregivers report adoption of positive and negative problem orientations and use of rational, impulsive, and avoidant problem-solving styles, and examines whether these problem-solving dimensions differ by age and gender. Results reveal statistically significant negative correlations between caregiver age and positive and negative problem orientations and use of a rational problem-solving style, and statistically significant gender differences with regard to negative problem orientation and use of an impulsive problem-solving style. Findings from this exploratory study highlight unique potential strengths and needs of caregivers, and set the stage for future research on problem-solving among cancer caregivers in the growing field of outpatient palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998336/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9436190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2165598
Aysha Jawed
This past summer, a 4-month-old baby named Heidi with microcephaly and subsequent autonomic instability was hospitalized for 1 month in an intermediate care unit at a hospital on the eastern seaboard. She was diagnosed with microcephaly at 2 months of age at the same hospital. During her most recent hospitalization, Heidi presented with significant neuroirritability. Her parents felt uncomfortable having her return home unless she was sleeping through the night without needing any pain medications. The family and the medical team had different perspectives on the management of Heidi’s care. Both recognized that Heidi had a progressive, degenerative illness; however, her parents felt that her illness would progress to death a lot sooner than the medical team’s prediction that she could potentially live for longer than 6 months. The medical team and nursing staff involved in her care were emotionally impacted by this hospitalization in several different ways. This was evident in behavioral responses such as distress, anger, fear, and defensiveness. As the social worker supporting Heidi’s family, I found myself as a gatekeeper and holder of information as well as an advocate and educator. The rest of the care team, especially our nursing staff, felt a sense of protection over the child which affected their objectivity in approaching the child’s case. This was a unique situation where the family’s peace about their child’s limited life span clashed with the care team’s expectation that the family would still be coming to terms with her illness.
{"title":"A Separate Peace.","authors":"Aysha Jawed","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2165598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2165598","url":null,"abstract":"This past summer, a 4-month-old baby named Heidi with microcephaly and subsequent autonomic instability was hospitalized for 1 month in an intermediate care unit at a hospital on the eastern seaboard. She was diagnosed with microcephaly at 2 months of age at the same hospital. During her most recent hospitalization, Heidi presented with significant neuroirritability. Her parents felt uncomfortable having her return home unless she was sleeping through the night without needing any pain medications. The family and the medical team had different perspectives on the management of Heidi’s care. Both recognized that Heidi had a progressive, degenerative illness; however, her parents felt that her illness would progress to death a lot sooner than the medical team’s prediction that she could potentially live for longer than 6 months. The medical team and nursing staff involved in her care were emotionally impacted by this hospitalization in several different ways. This was evident in behavioral responses such as distress, anger, fear, and defensiveness. As the social worker supporting Heidi’s family, I found myself as a gatekeeper and holder of information as well as an advocate and educator. The rest of the care team, especially our nursing staff, felt a sense of protection over the child which affected their objectivity in approaching the child’s case. This was a unique situation where the family’s peace about their child’s limited life span clashed with the care team’s expectation that the family would still be coming to terms with her illness.","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9123531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2022.2139336
Anneke Ullrich, Said Bahloul, Carsten Bokemeyer, Karin Oechsle
This prospective one-year cohort study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a routine psychosocial screening at patients' admittance to specialist inpatient palliative care. Patients admitted to an academic palliative care ward were routinely screened for self-reported distress and psychological morbidity, psychosocial stress factors, and subjective need for help from psychosocial professions. Cognitive impairments were the most common patient barrier to screening. Screenings were completed in 138 of 428 patients (32%). Based on established cutoffs, distress was indicated in 89%, depression in 51%, and anxiety in 50% of these patients. The burden on next-of-kin emerged as the most prevalent stress factor (73%). One-half of the patients disclosed a subjective need for help (53%). Possible depression (p = .023), anxiety (p < .001), and subjective need for help (p < .001) correlated positively with a higher amount of time spent by psychologists and creative arts-based therapists with small to moderate effects. Patients who completed the screening were attributed with a higher amount of time by social workers than patients who did not (p = .004), but there were no relationships between screening results and social work. Results suggest the potential of screenings for the allocation of specialist psychosocial care during specialist palliative care; however, barriers to screening do exist.
{"title":"Evaluation of a Routine Psychosocial Screening for Patients Receiving Inpatient Specialist Palliative Care: Feasibility and Outcomes.","authors":"Anneke Ullrich, Said Bahloul, Carsten Bokemeyer, Karin Oechsle","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2022.2139336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2022.2139336","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective one-year cohort study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a routine psychosocial screening at patients' admittance to specialist inpatient palliative care. Patients admitted to an academic palliative care ward were routinely screened for self-reported distress and psychological morbidity, psychosocial stress factors, and subjective need for help from psychosocial professions. Cognitive impairments were the most common patient barrier to screening. Screenings were completed in 138 of 428 patients (32%). Based on established cutoffs, distress was indicated in 89%, depression in 51%, and anxiety in 50% of these patients. The burden on next-of-kin emerged as the most prevalent stress factor (73%). One-half of the patients disclosed a subjective need for help (53%). Possible depression (<i>p</i> = .023), anxiety (<i>p</i> < .001), and subjective need for help (<i>p</i> < .001) correlated positively with a higher amount of time spent by psychologists and creative arts-based therapists with small to moderate effects. Patients who completed the screening were attributed with a higher amount of time by social workers than patients who did not (<i>p</i> = .004), but there were no relationships between screening results and social work. Results suggest the potential of screenings for the allocation of specialist psychosocial care during specialist palliative care; however, barriers to screening do exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"33-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9448002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2184601
Ellen L Csikai
Welcome to the new volume for 2023. In this issue, interventions to improve the lives of caregivers as they provide care to individuals near the end of life is the focus. After two reflections, in a practice concepts and innovations entry, Koufacos describes an educational intervention for stress-reduction among caregivers of Veterans with dementia. There were two aspects of the program, individual counseling provided to caregivers and group self-care webinars. The interventionist was a VA palliative care social worker and these techniques showed promising results. Further examination of this model is needed but it is something that other professionals may wish to consider to reduce caregiver stress and increase self-care among dementia caregivers. In the first of the research articles, a problem-solving intervention among family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care was examined with respect to dimensions/styles of problem solving. These dimensions are described well by Bruton et al., which included positive and negative orientations and found these to have a relationship with age. Also, gender was related to differences in use of rational problem-solving style and use of negative orientation and an impulsive problem-making style. Because cancer caregivers often have to deal with many changes in care plans, these factors can and should be assessed when working with cancer caregivers in outpatient palliative care settings to determine the most effective aspects of problem solving. Next, Ullrich et al., switch us to examine inpatient palliative care. A multi-factor screening intervention was conducted among patients admitted in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit in an academic center that included self-reported distress as well as psychosocial stress and others. High levels of distress, depression and anxiety were found and those indicating a subjective need for help were also found to have received assistance, such as increased use of psychological services. Social work services increased among those screened but not at a significant level. A major barrier to completing the screening was cognitive impairment. Different methods of screening for distress and other psychosocial problems may need to be developed specifically for palliative care settings. Finally, Isler and Yildirim share their study pointing to the tremendous need for hospice care in Turkey which is currently absent. Although some palliative care units exist, the needs of the country are not being met. In a qualitative approach, both oncology healthcare professionals and family caregivers of individuals near the end of life (without hospice services) were interviewed. Themes centered around preferences for environment of death, problems caused by in-hospital deaths, need for hospice care, and hospice care for caregivers. These themes were shared by the healthcare professionals and the caregivers. For individuals with cancer and their caregiver
{"title":"Editor's Introduction.","authors":"Ellen L Csikai","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2184601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2184601","url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to the new volume for 2023. In this issue, interventions to improve the lives of caregivers as they provide care to individuals near the end of life is the focus. After two reflections, in a practice concepts and innovations entry, Koufacos describes an educational intervention for stress-reduction among caregivers of Veterans with dementia. There were two aspects of the program, individual counseling provided to caregivers and group self-care webinars. The interventionist was a VA palliative care social worker and these techniques showed promising results. Further examination of this model is needed but it is something that other professionals may wish to consider to reduce caregiver stress and increase self-care among dementia caregivers. In the first of the research articles, a problem-solving intervention among family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care was examined with respect to dimensions/styles of problem solving. These dimensions are described well by Bruton et al., which included positive and negative orientations and found these to have a relationship with age. Also, gender was related to differences in use of rational problem-solving style and use of negative orientation and an impulsive problem-making style. Because cancer caregivers often have to deal with many changes in care plans, these factors can and should be assessed when working with cancer caregivers in outpatient palliative care settings to determine the most effective aspects of problem solving. Next, Ullrich et al., switch us to examine inpatient palliative care. A multi-factor screening intervention was conducted among patients admitted in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit in an academic center that included self-reported distress as well as psychosocial stress and others. High levels of distress, depression and anxiety were found and those indicating a subjective need for help were also found to have received assistance, such as increased use of psychological services. Social work services increased among those screened but not at a significant level. A major barrier to completing the screening was cognitive impairment. Different methods of screening for distress and other psychosocial problems may need to be developed specifically for palliative care settings. Finally, Isler and Yildirim share their study pointing to the tremendous need for hospice care in Turkey which is currently absent. Although some palliative care units exist, the needs of the country are not being met. In a qualitative approach, both oncology healthcare professionals and family caregivers of individuals near the end of life (without hospice services) were interviewed. Themes centered around preferences for environment of death, problems caused by in-hospital deaths, need for hospice care, and hospice care for caregivers. These themes were shared by the healthcare professionals and the caregivers. For individuals with cancer and their caregiver","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9131286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}