首页 > 最新文献

Swiss Journal of Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
I Need Somebody to Lean on 我需要有人依靠
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2019-04-30 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/A000224
M. De Clercq, C. Devos, A. Azzi, M. Frenay, O. Klein, B. Galand
Abstract. In the literature, social support is depicted as an important determinant of whether someone completes their doctoral process. However, few studies actually test the impact of social support in sound quantitative designs. The present study provides an incremental understanding of the social support effect by (a) assessing the joint influence of three sources of social support (supervisor, academic peers, and relatives) on the emotions of doctoral students, their perceived progress and intention to persist; and (b) testing the interactions between these three sources of support and the doctoral stage of advancement. To this end, we carried out a longitudinal three-wave study with 446 doctoral students from two Belgian universities. The hierarchical regressions showed that (1) only supervisor support significantly predicted the outcomes of doctoral students and (2) the influence of social support on intention to persist was moderated by the stage of advancement in the doctoral journey. We discuss these results and their implications for further work on social support in light of existing literature on doctoral persistence.
摘要在文献中,社会支持被描述为一个人是否完成他们的博士过程的重要决定因素。然而,很少有研究在可靠的定量设计中真正测试社会支持的影响。本研究通过(a)评估三种社会支持来源(导师、学术同伴和亲属)对博士生情绪、他们的感知进步和坚持意愿的共同影响,提供了对社会支持效应的增量理解;(b)检验这三种支持来源与博士晋升阶段的相互作用。为此,我们对来自比利时两所大学的446名博士生进行了纵向三波研究。层次回归结果显示:(1)只有导师支持对博士生的结果有显著的预测作用;(2)社会支持对博士生坚持意愿的影响受博士学习进程的调节。我们讨论这些结果和他们的影响,进一步工作的社会支持在现有文献的博士坚持的光。
{"title":"I Need Somebody to Lean on","authors":"M. De Clercq, C. Devos, A. Azzi, M. Frenay, O. Klein, B. Galand","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/A000224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/A000224","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In the literature, social support is depicted as an important determinant of whether someone completes their doctoral process. However, few studies actually test the impact of social support in sound quantitative designs. The present study provides an incremental understanding of the social support effect by (a) assessing the joint influence of three sources of social support (supervisor, academic peers, and relatives) on the emotions of doctoral students, their perceived progress and intention to persist; and (b) testing the interactions between these three sources of support and the doctoral stage of advancement. To this end, we carried out a longitudinal three-wave study with 446 doctoral students from two Belgian universities. The hierarchical regressions showed that (1) only supervisor support significantly predicted the outcomes of doctoral students and (2) the influence of social support on intention to persist was moderated by the stage of advancement in the doctoral journey. We discuss these results and their implications for further work on social support in light of existing literature on doctoral persistence.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45497287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
“Next Wednesday’s Meeting has been Moved Forward Two Days”: The Time-Perspective Question is Ambiguous in Swiss German, but not in Standard German “下周三的会议已经提前了两天”:时间视角问题在瑞士德语中是模棱两可的,而在标准德语中则不是
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000220
K. Stocker, M. Hartmann
If time is conceived of as a river, we either have the perspective of seeing ourselves as moving downstream toward the future (e.g., “We are approaching the future,” called ego moving), or we have the perspective of the future as moving upstream toward us (e.g., “The future is approaching,” called time moving). Most ego- and time-moving studies have been conducted by using an English ego/time-moving ambiguous question to implicitly measure a person’s current time perspective (ego vs. time moving). In the current study, we replicate previous findings that in (Standard) German the time-perspective question is not ambiguous, while showing as a new finding that it is ambiguous in Swiss German. We attribute this difference to different normative uses in these two German variants. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate dialectal differences in relation to cognitive processing of ego-/time-moving metaphors. Psychological and linguistic implications are discussed.
如果把时间想象成一条河流,我们要么看到自己在向下游流向未来(例如,“我们正在接近未来”,称为自我移动),要么看到未来在向上游流向我们(例如,“未来正在接近”,称为时间移动)。大多数关于自我和时间移动的研究都是通过使用英语自我/时间移动的模糊问题来含蓄地测量一个人当前的时间观(自我与时间移动)。在目前的研究中,我们重复了之前的研究结果,即在(标准)德语中,时间视角问题并不含糊,同时作为一项新发现,在瑞士德语中,它是含糊的。我们将这种差异归因于这两个德语变体中不同的规范用法。据我们所知,本研究首次探讨了方言差异与自我/时间移动隐喻的认知加工之间的关系。讨论了心理和语言含义。
{"title":"“Next Wednesday’s Meeting has been Moved Forward Two Days”: The Time-Perspective Question is Ambiguous in Swiss German, but not in Standard German","authors":"K. Stocker, M. Hartmann","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000220","url":null,"abstract":"If time is conceived of as a river, we either have the perspective of seeing ourselves as moving downstream toward the future (e.g., “We are approaching the future,” called ego moving), or we have the perspective of the future as moving upstream toward us (e.g., “The future is approaching,” called time moving). Most ego- and time-moving studies have been conducted by using an English ego/time-moving ambiguous question to implicitly measure a person’s current time perspective (ego vs. time moving). In the current study, we replicate previous findings that in (Standard) German the time-perspective question is not ambiguous, while showing as a new finding that it is ambiguous in Swiss German. We attribute this difference to different normative uses in these two German variants. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate dialectal differences in relation to cognitive processing of ego-/time-moving metaphors. Psychological and linguistic implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44815310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Equivalence of the German and the French Versions of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory 自我报告症状量表德语版和法语版的等效性
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000218
P. Giger, T. Merten
Against the background of the growing importance of symptom validity assessment both in forensic and clinical or rehabilitation contexts, a new instrument for identifying overreporting was developed. In order to study the equivalence of the German and the French versions, we divided the item pool of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI) into two presumably equivalent half-forms. A sample of 40 adult bilingual Swiss nationals with a mean age of 39.9 years responded honestly to one of the half-forms in German and to the other in French. In a subsequent experimental malingering condition, they were asked to simulate sequelae of a whiplash injury and to respond to the SRSI again. In both conditions, they also filled out the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). The results showed no differences between the two language versions in both conditions. Classification accuracy was very high (100% specificity, 90% sensitivity for the standard cutoff score). Reliability estimates were 0.93 for endorsement of genuine symptoms and 0.97 for pseudosymptom endorsement. In the malingering condition, the correlation between the number of reported pseudosymptoms and the SIMS scores was 0.69. The current results add to the database available for the SRSI and support the appropriateness of the French version.
在法医、临床或康复背景下,症状有效性评估越来越重要的背景下,开发了一种新的工具来识别过度报告。为了研究德语版和法语版的等效性,我们将自我报告症状量表(SRSI)的项目库分为两种可能等效的半形式。40名平均年龄39.9岁的瑞士双语成年国民对其中一半的德语和另一半的法语做出了诚实的回答。在随后的实验性装病条件下,他们被要求模拟挥鞭损伤的后遗症,并再次对SRSI做出反应。在这两种情况下,他们还填写了《恶性症状结构化清单》(SIMS)。结果显示,在两种情况下,两种语言版本之间没有差异。分类准确率非常高(标准分界点的特异性为100%,敏感性为90%)。真实症状认可的可靠性估计为0.93,假症状认可的可信度估计为0.97。在装病的情况下,报告的假症状数量与SIMS评分之间的相关性为0.69。目前的结果增加了SRSI可用的数据库,并支持法语版本的适当性。
{"title":"Equivalence of the German and the French Versions of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory","authors":"P. Giger, T. Merten","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000218","url":null,"abstract":"Against the background of the growing importance of symptom validity assessment both in forensic and clinical or rehabilitation contexts, a new instrument for identifying overreporting was developed. In order to study the equivalence of the German and the French versions, we divided the item pool of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI) into two presumably equivalent half-forms. A sample of 40 adult bilingual Swiss nationals with a mean age of 39.9 years responded honestly to one of the half-forms in German and to the other in French. In a subsequent experimental malingering condition, they were asked to simulate sequelae of a whiplash injury and to respond to the SRSI again. In both conditions, they also filled out the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). The results showed no differences between the two language versions in both conditions. Classification accuracy was very high (100% specificity, 90% sensitivity for the standard cutoff score). Reliability estimates were 0.93 for endorsement of genuine symptoms and 0.97 for pseudosymptom endorsement. In the malingering condition, the correlation between the number of reported pseudosymptoms and the SIMS scores was 0.69. The current results add to the database available for the SRSI and support the appropriateness of the French version.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48303726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Does the Use of Gender-Fair Language Influence the Comprehensibility of Texts?: An Experiment Using an Authentic Contract Manipulating Single Role Nouns and Pronouns 性别公平语言的使用是否影响文本的可理解性?使用真实契约操纵单角色名词和代词的实验
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000223
Marcus C. G. Friedrich, E. Heise
In many languages masculine nouns and pronouns can be interpreted to refer to both male and female referents. However, even when the authors expressly point out that masculine forms are being used to refer to both women and men, readers and listeners predominantly form mental images of men. A gender-fair language that uses either masculine and feminine forms or gender-neutral forms to refer to women and men more equally elicits mental images of women and men. Critics often argue, however, that gender-fair language makes texts less comprehensible (readable). The present study tests this assumption for the German language: 355 students read a randomly assigned text that either used masculine-only forms or consistently used both masculine and feminine forms. After that, they answered the comprehensibility questionnaire by Friedrich (2017). Participants who had read a text in gender-fair language did not give statistically significant lower ratings of comprehensibility than participants who had read a text that used masculine-only forms (partial &eegr;2 < .01; p > .05). The results indicate that the use of gender-fair language does not impair the comprehensibility of texts.
在许多语言中,阳性名词和代词可以被解释为既指男性又指女性。然而,即使作者明确指出男性形式被用来指代女性和男性,读者和听众也主要形成男性的心理形象。一种性别公平的语言,使用阳性和阴性形式或中性形式来更平等地指代女性和男性,会引发女性和男性的心理形象。然而,批评者经常认为,性别公平的语言使文本不太容易理解(可读)。本研究对德语的这一假设进行了测试:355名学生阅读了随机分配的文本,这些文本要么只使用阳性形式,要么一直使用阳性和阴性形式。之后,他们回答了Friedrich(2017)的可理解性问卷。与阅读仅使用阳性形式的文本的参与者相比,使用性别公平语言阅读文本的参与者的可理解性评分在统计学上没有显著降低(partial&eegr;2<.01;p>.05)。结果表明,使用性别平等语言不会损害文本的可理解力。
{"title":"Does the Use of Gender-Fair Language Influence the Comprehensibility of Texts?: An Experiment Using an Authentic Contract Manipulating Single Role Nouns and Pronouns","authors":"Marcus C. G. Friedrich, E. Heise","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000223","url":null,"abstract":"In many languages masculine nouns and pronouns can be interpreted to refer to both male and female referents. However, even when the authors expressly point out that masculine forms are being used to refer to both women and men, readers and listeners predominantly form mental images of men. A gender-fair language that uses either masculine and feminine forms or gender-neutral forms to refer to women and men more equally elicits mental images of women and men. Critics often argue, however, that gender-fair language makes texts less comprehensible (readable). The present study tests this assumption for the German language: 355 students read a randomly assigned text that either used masculine-only forms or consistently used both masculine and feminine forms. After that, they answered the comprehensibility questionnaire by Friedrich (2017). Participants who had read a text in gender-fair language did not give statistically significant lower ratings of comprehensibility than participants who had read a text that used masculine-only forms (partial &eegr;2 < .01; p > .05). The results indicate that the use of gender-fair language does not impair the comprehensibility of texts.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46980888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
French Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action Programs and Their Beneficiaries 法国人对平权行动计划及其受益者的态度
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000222
A. Taillandier-Schmitt, Christelle Maisonneuve
Attitudes toward affirmative action programs (AAPs) depend on the criteria on which these programs are based and on the ideological views in the relationships between groups. The present study examined the impact of the selection procedure (with or without AA) on the perception of justice and on attitudes toward the beneficiaries of these procedures in France, where the system makes it possible to compare beneficiaries of different origins. A group of 101 French students read scenarios describing the admission of a candidate, with either a French or a North African first name, to a prestigious school, based on either a standard selection procedure or AA. The standard procedure and its beneficiary were more positively judged, and the beneficiary was considered more competent, than one selected with AAP. These results were particularly significant for participants with a high level of social dominance orientation (SDO). Furthermore, participants perceived both selection procedures more positively and judged the candidate as being more competent when that person had a French-sounding name. High-SDO participants underestimated socioeconomic and ethnic discrimination. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
对平权行动计划(AAPs)的态度取决于这些计划所依据的标准以及群体之间关系的意识形态观点。本研究审查了选择程序(有或没有AA)对法国人对正义的看法和对这些程序受益人的态度的影响,在法国,该制度使比较不同出身的受益人成为可能。一组101名法国学生读了一个场景,描述了一个有法国或北非名字的候选人被名牌学校录取的情况,根据标准选拔程序或AA程序。与AAP相比,标准程序及其受益人得到了更积极的评价,受益人被认为更有能力。这些结果对于具有高社会支配倾向(SDO)的参与者尤为显著。此外,参与者更积极地看待这两种选择程序,并认为名字听起来像法语的候选人更有能力。高sdo参与者低估了社会经济和种族歧视。讨论了理论和实践意义。
{"title":"French Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action Programs and Their Beneficiaries","authors":"A. Taillandier-Schmitt, Christelle Maisonneuve","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000222","url":null,"abstract":"Attitudes toward affirmative action programs (AAPs) depend on the criteria on which these programs are based and on the ideological views in the relationships between groups. The present study examined the impact of the selection procedure (with or without AA) on the perception of justice and on attitudes toward the beneficiaries of these procedures in France, where the system makes it possible to compare beneficiaries of different origins. A group of 101 French students read scenarios describing the admission of a candidate, with either a French or a North African first name, to a prestigious school, based on either a standard selection procedure or AA. The standard procedure and its beneficiary were more positively judged, and the beneficiary was considered more competent, than one selected with AAP. These results were particularly significant for participants with a high level of social dominance orientation (SDO). Furthermore, participants perceived both selection procedures more positively and judged the candidate as being more competent when that person had a French-sounding name. High-SDO participants underestimated socioeconomic and ethnic discrimination. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42176072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Target-Specific Learning Contributes to Practice Effects in Paper-and-Pencil Tests of Attention 针对性学习有助于注意力纸笔测试的实践效果
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000221
Peter Wühr
Previous studies revealed that performance in paper-and-pencil tests of attention, such as the d2-R test, improves with practice, though the sources of these practice effects are yet unknown. Practice effects in psychometric tests are a serious problem because they impede the evaluation of test performance and constrain the utility of these tests. This study addresses the role of target-specific learning for practice in a d2-like paper-and-pencil test of attention. Two variants of a d2-like test, which exclusively differed in the set of target stimuli, were constructed. Participants were tested on two days separated by one week. Participants in the control condition searched for the same targets (among the same distractors) in each session, whereas participants in the test group searched for different targets (among the same distractors) in each session. Results showed practice benefits in both groups, but benefits were larger in the control group than in the test group. The results suggest that practice improves the processing of target features in paper-and-pencil tests of attention. Hence, using two versions with different sets of targets may effectively reduce practice effects in d2-like tests of attention. Further implications of the findings are discussed.
先前的研究表明,注意力的纸笔测试(如d2-R测试)的表现会随着练习而提高,尽管这些练习效果的来源尚不清楚。心理测量测试中的实践效果是一个严重的问题,因为它们阻碍了对测试性能的评估,并限制了这些测试的实用性。这项研究探讨了特定目标学习在类似d2的注意力纸笔测试中的作用。构建了两种类似d2的测试变体,它们在目标刺激集上完全不同。参与者在相隔一周的两天内接受测试。控制条件下的参与者在每个会话中搜索相同的目标(在相同的干扰物中),而测试组的参与者在每次会话中搜索不同的目标(从相同的干扰物中)。结果显示,两组都有实践效益,但对照组的效益大于试验组。研究结果表明,实践提高了注意力纸笔测试中目标特征的处理能力。因此,在类似d2的注意力测试中,使用具有不同目标集的两个版本可以有效地降低练习效果。讨论了研究结果的进一步含义。
{"title":"Target-Specific Learning Contributes to Practice Effects in Paper-and-Pencil Tests of Attention","authors":"Peter Wühr","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000221","url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies revealed that performance in paper-and-pencil tests of attention, such as the d2-R test, improves with practice, though the sources of these practice effects are yet unknown. Practice effects in psychometric tests are a serious problem because they impede the evaluation of test performance and constrain the utility of these tests. This study addresses the role of target-specific learning for practice in a d2-like paper-and-pencil test of attention. Two variants of a d2-like test, which exclusively differed in the set of target stimuli, were constructed. Participants were tested on two days separated by one week. Participants in the control condition searched for the same targets (among the same distractors) in each session, whereas participants in the test group searched for different targets (among the same distractors) in each session. Results showed practice benefits in both groups, but benefits were larger in the control group than in the test group. The results suggest that practice improves the processing of target features in paper-and-pencil tests of attention. Hence, using two versions with different sets of targets may effectively reduce practice effects in d2-like tests of attention. Further implications of the findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47283842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
An Internet-Based Intervention for the Relatives of People with Mental Illnesses: An Open Pilot Trial with Two Groups 基于互联网的精神疾病患者亲属干预:两组开放试点试验
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000219
V. Salamin, Philip B. Ray, I. Gothuey, S. Corzani, C. Martin-Soelch
Relatives of individuals with mental illness are exposed to an elevated level of burden. Consequently, it is important to provide them with coping strategies. We explored the benefits of an online skills-training intervention. This open, uncontrolled interventional pilot study included 104 relatives of individuals with a mental illness. They participated either in a face-to-face group (n = 60) or online intervention (n = 44); participants were free to choose the type of intervention. Depressive symptoms and emotion regulation were assessed before and after the interventions. The analysis was based on an intention-to-treat model. About one-third of both samples did not complete the posttest assessments. The results of a multivariate analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of the interaction between time and intervention type, F(2,101) = 11.77, p < .01. Reductions in depressive symptoms, F(1,102) = 9.41, p < .01, &egr;2p = .08, and emotion-regulation difficulty, F(1,102) = 8.01, p < .01, &egr;2p = .07, following the online intervention were greater relative to the group intervention. Despite the limitations of this study because of group differences, the results demonstrated the benefits of an online intervention for the relatives. These encouraging initial results require further confirmation using a randomized controlled trial.
患有精神疾病的人的亲属面临着更高的负担。因此,重要的是为他们提供应对策略。我们探讨了在线技能培训干预的好处。这项开放的、不受控制的干预试点研究包括104名精神疾病患者的亲属。他们要么参加面对面小组(n=60),要么参加在线干预(n=44);参与者可以自由选择干预类型。在干预前后评估抑郁症状和情绪调节。该分析基于意向治疗模型。两个样本中约有三分之一没有完成测试后评估。多变量方差分析结果显示,时间和干预类型之间的相互作用有显著影响,F(2101)=11.77,p<0.01。抑郁症状的减少,F(1102)=9.41,p<.01,&egr;2p=0.08,情绪调节困难,F(1102)=8.01,p<0.01,&egr;2p=.07,在线干预后的患者比小组干预后的更大。尽管由于群体差异,这项研究存在局限性,但结果证明了在线干预对亲属的好处。这些令人鼓舞的初步结果需要通过随机对照试验进一步证实。
{"title":"An Internet-Based Intervention for the Relatives of People with Mental Illnesses: An Open Pilot Trial with Two Groups","authors":"V. Salamin, Philip B. Ray, I. Gothuey, S. Corzani, C. Martin-Soelch","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000219","url":null,"abstract":"Relatives of individuals with mental illness are exposed to an elevated level of burden. Consequently, it is important to provide them with coping strategies. We explored the benefits of an online skills-training intervention. This open, uncontrolled interventional pilot study included 104 relatives of individuals with a mental illness. They participated either in a face-to-face group (n = 60) or online intervention (n = 44); participants were free to choose the type of intervention. Depressive symptoms and emotion regulation were assessed before and after the interventions. The analysis was based on an intention-to-treat model. About one-third of both samples did not complete the posttest assessments. The results of a multivariate analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of the interaction between time and intervention type, F(2,101) = 11.77, p < .01. Reductions in depressive symptoms, F(1,102) = 9.41, p < .01, &egr;2p = .08, and emotion-regulation difficulty, F(1,102) = 8.01, p < .01, &egr;2p = .07, following the online intervention were greater relative to the group intervention. Despite the limitations of this study because of group differences, the results demonstrated the benefits of an online intervention for the relatives. These encouraging initial results require further confirmation using a randomized controlled trial.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44461413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Providing Freshmen with a Good “Starting-Block”: Two Brief Social-Psychological Interventions to Promote Early Adjustment to the First Year at University 为新生提供一个良好的“起点”:两种简短的社会心理干预促进大学第一年的早期适应
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000217
M. De Clercq, C. Michel, Sophie Remy, B. Galand
Grounded in social-psychological literature, this experimental study assessed the effects of two so-called “wise” interventions implemented in a student study program. The interventions took place during the very first week at university, a presumed pivotal phase of transition. A group of 375 freshmen in psychology were randomly assigned to three conditions: control, social belonging, and self-affirmation. Following the intervention, students in the social-belonging condition expressed less social apprehension, a higher social integration, and a stronger intention to persist one month later than the other participants. They also relied more on peers as a source of support when confronted with a study task. Students in the self-affirmation condition felt more self-affirmed at the end of the intervention but didn’t benefit from other lasting effects. The results suggest that some well-timed and well-targeted “wise” interventions could provide lasting positive consequences for student adjustment. The respective merits of social-belonging and self-affirmation interventions are also discussed.
在社会心理学文献的基础上,这项实验研究评估了在学生学习计划中实施的两种所谓的“明智”干预的效果。这些干预是在大学的第一周进行的,这被认为是过渡的关键阶段。一组375名心理学新生被随机分配到三个条件:控制、社会归属和自我肯定。干预后,社会归属组的学生表现出较低的社会忧虑,较高的社会融合,并在一个月后比其他参与者表现出更强的坚持意愿。在面对学习任务时,他们也更多地依赖同伴作为支持来源。自我肯定组的学生在干预结束时感到更加自我肯定,但没有从其他持久影响中受益。结果表明,一些适时和有针对性的“明智”干预可以为学生的适应提供持久的积极影响。社会归属和自我肯定干预各自的优点也进行了讨论。
{"title":"Providing Freshmen with a Good “Starting-Block”: Two Brief Social-Psychological Interventions to Promote Early Adjustment to the First Year at University","authors":"M. De Clercq, C. Michel, Sophie Remy, B. Galand","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000217","url":null,"abstract":"Grounded in social-psychological literature, this experimental study assessed the effects of two so-called “wise” interventions implemented in a student study program. The interventions took place during the very first week at university, a presumed pivotal phase of transition. A group of 375 freshmen in psychology were randomly assigned to three conditions: control, social belonging, and self-affirmation. Following the intervention, students in the social-belonging condition expressed less social apprehension, a higher social integration, and a stronger intention to persist one month later than the other participants. They also relied more on peers as a source of support when confronted with a study task. Students in the self-affirmation condition felt more self-affirmed at the end of the intervention but didn’t benefit from other lasting effects. The results suggest that some well-timed and well-targeted “wise” interventions could provide lasting positive consequences for student adjustment. The respective merits of social-belonging and self-affirmation interventions are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41617098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Item-Response Theory Psychometric Analysis and Factor Structure of the Self-Compassion and Self-Criticism Scales 自我同情与自我批评量表的项目反应理论、心理测量分析及因素结构
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2018-09-21 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000216
J. Halamová, M. Kanovský, Monika Pacúchová
The study verifies the psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Self-Compassion and Self-Criticism Scales (SCCS) using item response theory, factor analysis, and scale validity. The survey sample was collected by convenience sampling and consisted of 514 participants (27% men and 73% women) with a mean age of 26.16 years (SD = 8.32). A two-dimensional structure of the scale was not confirmed. The Self-Criticism subscale of the SCCS remained the same as in the original study, and the Self-Compassion subscale of the SCCS was divided into the subscales Self-Compassion (compassionate reaction to self) and Self-Reassurance (reassuring and soothing reactions to self). The Slovak translation of the SCCS seems to be a reliable instrument to measure the level of self-compassion and self-criticism. The validity of the SCCS should be further explored by linking the scale results to directly observable outcome measures as there are significant but very weak correlations with other related scales. This could be due to differences between situational and trait self-compassion and self-criticism.
本研究运用项目反应理论、因子分析和量表效度对斯洛伐克版自我同情与自我批评量表(SCCS)的心理测量特性进行了验证。调查样本采用方便抽样法,共514人,其中男性27%,女性73%,平均年龄26.16岁(SD = 8.32)。该比例尺的二维结构尚未得到证实。自我同情量表将自我同情量表分为自我同情量表(对自我的同情反应)和自我安慰量表(对自我的安慰和安慰反应)。SCCS的斯洛伐克语译本似乎是衡量自我同情和自我批评水平的可靠工具。由于与其他相关量表存在显著但非常弱的相关性,因此应该通过将量表结果与直接可观察到的结果测量相关联来进一步探索SCCS的有效性。这可能是由于情境和特质自我同情和自我批评之间的差异。
{"title":"Item-Response Theory Psychometric Analysis and Factor Structure of the Self-Compassion and Self-Criticism Scales","authors":"J. Halamová, M. Kanovský, Monika Pacúchová","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000216","url":null,"abstract":"The study verifies the psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Self-Compassion and Self-Criticism Scales (SCCS) using item response theory, factor analysis, and scale validity. The survey sample was collected by convenience sampling and consisted of 514 participants (27% men and 73% women) with a mean age of 26.16 years (SD = 8.32). A two-dimensional structure of the scale was not confirmed. The Self-Criticism subscale of the SCCS remained the same as in the original study, and the Self-Compassion subscale of the SCCS was divided into the subscales Self-Compassion (compassionate reaction to self) and Self-Reassurance (reassuring and soothing reactions to self). The Slovak translation of the SCCS seems to be a reliable instrument to measure the level of self-compassion and self-criticism. The validity of the SCCS should be further explored by linking the scale results to directly observable outcome measures as there are significant but very weak correlations with other related scales. This could be due to differences between situational and trait self-compassion and self-criticism.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45214123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Do Writing Directions Influence How People Map Space onto Time?: Evidence from Japanese and Taiwanese Speakers 写作方向会影响人们如何将空间映射到时间吗?:来自日语和台语使用者的证据
IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Pub Date : 2018-09-21 DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000215
Wenxing Yang, Ying Sun
The causal role of a unidirectional orthography in shaping speakers’ mental representations of time seems to be well established by many psychological experiments. However, the question of whether bidirectional writing systems in some languages can also produce such an impact on temporal cognition remains unresolved. To address this issue, the present study focused on Japanese and Taiwanese, both of which have a similar mix of texts written horizontally from left to right (HLR) and vertically from top to bottom (VTB). Two experiments were performed which recruited Japanese and Taiwanese speakers as participants. Experiment 1 used an explicit temporal arrangement design, and Experiment 2 measured implicit space-time associations in participants along the horizontal (left/right) and the vertical (up/down) axis. Converging evidence gathered from the two experiments demonstrate that neither Japanese speakers nor Taiwanese speakers aligned their vertical representations of time with the VTB writing orientation. Along the horizontal axis, only Japanese speakers encoded elapsing time into a left-to-right linear layout, which was commensurate with the HLR writing direction. Therefore, two distinct writing orientations of a language could not bring about two coexisting mental time lines. Possible theoretical implications underlying the findings are discussed.
单向正字法在塑造说话人对时间的心理表征方面的因果作用似乎已经通过许多心理学实验得到了很好的证实。然而,一些语言中的双向书写系统是否也会对时间认知产生这样的影响,这个问题仍然没有解决。为了解决这个问题,本研究集中在日语和台语上,这两种语言都有类似的从左到右水平书写(HLR)和从上到下垂直书写(VTB)的混合文本。进行了两个实验,招募了讲日语和台语的人作为参与者。实验1使用了显式时间安排设计,实验2测量了参与者沿水平(左/右)和垂直(上/下)轴的隐含时空关联。从这两个实验中收集的证据表明,无论是说日语的人还是说台语的人,他们对时间的垂直表示都与VTB的写作取向不一致。沿着横轴,只有讲日语的人将逝去的时间编码为从左到右的线性布局,这与HLR的书写方向相当。因此,一种语言的两种截然不同的写作取向不可能带来两条共存的心理时间线。讨论了这些发现可能的理论含义。
{"title":"Do Writing Directions Influence How People Map Space onto Time?: Evidence from Japanese and Taiwanese Speakers","authors":"Wenxing Yang, Ying Sun","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000215","url":null,"abstract":"The causal role of a unidirectional orthography in shaping speakers’ mental representations of time seems to be well established by many psychological experiments. However, the question of whether bidirectional writing systems in some languages can also produce such an impact on temporal cognition remains unresolved. To address this issue, the present study focused on Japanese and Taiwanese, both of which have a similar mix of texts written horizontally from left to right (HLR) and vertically from top to bottom (VTB). Two experiments were performed which recruited Japanese and Taiwanese speakers as participants. Experiment 1 used an explicit temporal arrangement design, and Experiment 2 measured implicit space-time associations in participants along the horizontal (left/right) and the vertical (up/down) axis. Converging evidence gathered from the two experiments demonstrate that neither Japanese speakers nor Taiwanese speakers aligned their vertical representations of time with the VTB writing orientation. Along the horizontal axis, only Japanese speakers encoded elapsing time into a left-to-right linear layout, which was commensurate with the HLR writing direction. Therefore, two distinct writing orientations of a language could not bring about two coexisting mental time lines. Possible theoretical implications underlying the findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43308119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
Swiss Journal of Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1