Pub Date : 2021-05-11DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1924632
A. Ouedraogo, Klaus Schlichte
ABSTRACT Food policy is a predominantly overlooked vector of state formation in Africa. Comparing the trajectories of food policy in Senegal and Uganda, this article shows how internationally embedded food policies underpin state domination. It highlights three themes – early colonial food policies, the rise of organisational knowledge and the internationalisation of state domination through multilateral “assistance”. This argument is based on field research in both countries and on official documents and secondary literature. Its theoretical orientation draws upon a historical sociology of the State, as opposed to the idea of the heroic nation-state or the State as a component of “global ‘governance'”. We claim that food policy is highly politicised and that its effects on the State deserve much more attention in International Relations (IR), on the one hand, and state theory on the other. To study politics around food, we argue, would help to globalise IR.
{"title":"Food policy and state formation in Senegal and Uganda","authors":"A. Ouedraogo, Klaus Schlichte","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1924632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1924632","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Food policy is a predominantly overlooked vector of state formation in Africa. Comparing the trajectories of food policy in Senegal and Uganda, this article shows how internationally embedded food policies underpin state domination. It highlights three themes – early colonial food policies, the rise of organisational knowledge and the internationalisation of state domination through multilateral “assistance”. This argument is based on field research in both countries and on official documents and secondary literature. Its theoretical orientation draws upon a historical sociology of the State, as opposed to the idea of the heroic nation-state or the State as a component of “global ‘governance'”. We claim that food policy is highly politicised and that its effects on the State deserve much more attention in International Relations (IR), on the one hand, and state theory on the other. To study politics around food, we argue, would help to globalise IR.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"475 - 495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1924632","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47735097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-23DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1901662
Christian Hernandez
ABSTRACT Despite over twenty years of political resistance, globalisation endures, both as a discourse and political project. While many works have established how discourses of globalisation serve to constrain and/or guide macroeconomic policy, the dynamic nexus that exists between microeconomic decision-making processes vis-à-vis macroeconomic conditions is a less explored matter. Epistemologically, this paper offers a means of gaining analytical purchase over the logics, motivations, and thought processes of international bankers – and the financial press, which chronicle their actions. This is accomplished via a rigorous discursive-content analysis that gauges how said agents understood globalisation, the role of finance, the state, and even how market sentiment was factored into their ontological worldview. Ultimately, the goal is to establish an historical and spatiotemporally heterogeneous analysis on if, how, and what ideas of globalisation and neoliberalism influenced/rationalized the financialization of Argentine banks during the 1990s and how these evolved en route to Argentina's 2001 collapse.
{"title":"Globalisation, Black Swans, and financialisation as social constructions: A Discursive Institutional Analysis of Banamex, Citibank, and Scotiabank in Argentina","authors":"Christian Hernandez","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1901662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1901662","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite over twenty years of political resistance, globalisation endures, both as a discourse and political project. While many works have established how discourses of globalisation serve to constrain and/or guide macroeconomic policy, the dynamic nexus that exists between microeconomic decision-making processes vis-à-vis macroeconomic conditions is a less explored matter. Epistemologically, this paper offers a means of gaining analytical purchase over the logics, motivations, and thought processes of international bankers – and the financial press, which chronicle their actions. This is accomplished via a rigorous discursive-content analysis that gauges how said agents understood globalisation, the role of finance, the state, and even how market sentiment was factored into their ontological worldview. Ultimately, the goal is to establish an historical and spatiotemporally heterogeneous analysis on if, how, and what ideas of globalisation and neoliberalism influenced/rationalized the financialization of Argentine banks during the 1990s and how these evolved en route to Argentina's 2001 collapse.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"134 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1901662","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47114309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-22DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1895082
Susan J. Henders
ABSTRACT The article advances understanding of the relationships between diplomacies and governance and the role of non-state actors in them, through a case study of migrant norm-making. Drawing from 50 interviews, the analysis examines how Canadian residents of Hong Kong during the 2014 Occupy Central and Umbrella Movement protests enacted through their diplomatic practices what Wiener calls the “meanings-in-use” of norms—specifically, respect for democracy and human rights, as well as foreign non-interference. These NSA diplomatic practices made visible world order's contested multi-level normative frames within a local democratization struggle. The analysis provides starting points for research on how transnational lives, liminal identifications, class, denizenship, and state power shape NSA diplomacies. It advances the theorizing of norm-making within diplomacy, using insights from critical diplomacy studies, including the “other diplomacies” approach.
{"title":"Non-state Diplomacies and Norm-making during the Occupy Central and Umbrella Movement: Hong Kong’s Canadian Residents","authors":"Susan J. Henders","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1895082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1895082","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article advances understanding of the relationships between diplomacies and governance and the role of non-state actors in them, through a case study of migrant norm-making. Drawing from 50 interviews, the analysis examines how Canadian residents of Hong Kong during the 2014 Occupy Central and Umbrella Movement protests enacted through their diplomatic practices what Wiener calls the “meanings-in-use” of norms—specifically, respect for democracy and human rights, as well as foreign non-interference. These NSA diplomatic practices made visible world order's contested multi-level normative frames within a local democratization struggle. The analysis provides starting points for research on how transnational lives, liminal identifications, class, denizenship, and state power shape NSA diplomacies. It advances the theorizing of norm-making within diplomacy, using insights from critical diplomacy studies, including the “other diplomacies” approach.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"69 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1895082","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49389381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-20DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1902284
Mike Zapp
ABSTRACT As novel instruments in global governance, international organisations’ (IOs) global reports have emerged in all policy sectors in the more recent period. Drawing on an original dataset of N = 363 editions from N = 95 explicitly global reports from the period 1947–2019, this study documents the rise of reporting and uses citation and content analyses to examine the changing role of science. Reporting based on scientific research and quantitative indicators increases over time and across all sectors, yet particularly striking since the late 1980s and most in sectors dealing with human development and the environment. Drawing on arguments from world society theory, the sociology of quantification and post-truth approaches, this work argues that while reports provide IOs with new legitimacy in science-based governance, their scientised and quantified nature is likely to make IO activities the target of antiscientific populist rhetoric and critical arguments about a reductionist interpretation of science.
{"title":"International Organisations and the Proliferation of Scientised Global Reporting, 1947–2019","authors":"Mike Zapp","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1902284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1902284","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As novel instruments in global governance, international organisations’ (IOs) global reports have emerged in all policy sectors in the more recent period. Drawing on an original dataset of N = 363 editions from N = 95 explicitly global reports from the period 1947–2019, this study documents the rise of reporting and uses citation and content analyses to examine the changing role of science. Reporting based on scientific research and quantitative indicators increases over time and across all sectors, yet particularly striking since the late 1980s and most in sectors dealing with human development and the environment. Drawing on arguments from world society theory, the sociology of quantification and post-truth approaches, this work argues that while reports provide IOs with new legitimacy in science-based governance, their scientised and quantified nature is likely to make IO activities the target of antiscientific populist rhetoric and critical arguments about a reductionist interpretation of science.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"455 - 474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1902284","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45513570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-03-19DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1898343
Konsta Kotilainen
ABSTRACT The increasingly influential neochartalist Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) comes with a nation-state-centric framing of politics. The neochartalists argue that many alleged globalisation-related constraints on national economic policy are illusory or seriously overstated. In their view, monetarily sovereign states enjoy substantial autonomy over their fiscal and monetary policy decisions. The neochartalist diagnosis thus seems to undermine cosmopolitan calls for supranational forms of macroeconomic governance. However, this paper argues that if we pay serious attention to a range of subtler obstacles and strategic incentives that apply especially to small currency-issuing states, cosmopolitan aspirations remain well-motivated. Accordingly, the political implications of MMT are reexamined and a case for supranational exercise of monetary sovereignty is made. The paper goes on to demonstrate how the standard state-centric approach to currency privileges can prove counterproductive from the perspective of democratic governance. It is concluded that neochartalism and cosmopolitanism can fruitfully both correct and enrich each other.
{"title":"A Cosmopolitan Reading of Modern Monetary Theory","authors":"Konsta Kotilainen","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1898343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1898343","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The increasingly influential neochartalist Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) comes with a nation-state-centric framing of politics. The neochartalists argue that many alleged globalisation-related constraints on national economic policy are illusory or seriously overstated. In their view, monetarily sovereign states enjoy substantial autonomy over their fiscal and monetary policy decisions. The neochartalist diagnosis thus seems to undermine cosmopolitan calls for supranational forms of macroeconomic governance. However, this paper argues that if we pay serious attention to a range of subtler obstacles and strategic incentives that apply especially to small currency-issuing states, cosmopolitan aspirations remain well-motivated. Accordingly, the political implications of MMT are reexamined and a case for supranational exercise of monetary sovereignty is made. The paper goes on to demonstrate how the standard state-centric approach to currency privileges can prove counterproductive from the perspective of democratic governance. It is concluded that neochartalism and cosmopolitanism can fruitfully both correct and enrich each other.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"89 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1898343","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46056143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-03-04DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1885352
Anna Holzscheiter, Sassan Gholiagha, A. Liese
ABSTRACT To date, there has been little research on how advocacy coalitions influence the dynamic relationships between norms. Addressing norm collisions as a particular type of norm dynamics, we ask if and how advocacy coalitions and the constellations between them bring such norm collisions to the fore. Norm collisions surface in situations in which actors claim that two or more norms are incompatible with each other, promoting different, even opposing, behavioural choices. We examine the effect of advocacy coalition constellations (ACC) on the activation and varying evolution of norm collisions in three issue areas: international drug control, human trafficking, and child labour. These areas have a legally codified prohibitive regime in common. At the same time, they differ with regard to the specific ACC present. Exploiting this variation, we generate insights into how power asymmetries and other characteristics of ACC affect norm collisions across our three issue areas.
{"title":"Advocacy Coalition Constellations and Norm Collisions: Insights from International Drug Control, Human Trafficking, and Child Labour","authors":"Anna Holzscheiter, Sassan Gholiagha, A. Liese","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1885352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1885352","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To date, there has been little research on how advocacy coalitions influence the dynamic relationships between norms. Addressing norm collisions as a particular type of norm dynamics, we ask if and how advocacy coalitions and the constellations between them bring such norm collisions to the fore. Norm collisions surface in situations in which actors claim that two or more norms are incompatible with each other, promoting different, even opposing, behavioural choices. We examine the effect of advocacy coalition constellations (ACC) on the activation and varying evolution of norm collisions in three issue areas: international drug control, human trafficking, and child labour. These areas have a legally codified prohibitive regime in common. At the same time, they differ with regard to the specific ACC present. Exploiting this variation, we generate insights into how power asymmetries and other characteristics of ACC affect norm collisions across our three issue areas.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"25 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1885352","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42735944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-19DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1881049
M. Voss
ABSTRACT Human rights defenders (HRD) are facing shrinking spaces. The United Nations Human Rights Council (Council) is one of these potentially shrinking spaces. At the Council, there exists significant contestation over HRD and their role in human rights protection. Resolutions on HRD are facing contestation including lengthy debates and record-setting numbers of amendments by opponents of HRD initiatives. This paper uses theories of contestation from international relations to examine how Member States both advocate for and against HRD at the Council. Case study analysis including participant observation and elite-level interviews are used to examine strategies used by Member States. The paper finds that both advocates and proponents use a multitude of strategies aimed at defending or defeating the validity and application of HRD resolutions. This type of contestation matters for HRD because it eventually impacts the ability of defenders to promote and protect human rights on the ground.
{"title":"Contesting Human Rights Defenders at the United Nations Human Rights Council","authors":"M. Voss","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1881049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1881049","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Human rights defenders (HRD) are facing shrinking spaces. The United Nations Human Rights Council (Council) is one of these potentially shrinking spaces. At the Council, there exists significant contestation over HRD and their role in human rights protection. Resolutions on HRD are facing contestation including lengthy debates and record-setting numbers of amendments by opponents of HRD initiatives. This paper uses theories of contestation from international relations to examine how Member States both advocate for and against HRD at the Council. Case study analysis including participant observation and elite-level interviews are used to examine strategies used by Member States. The paper finds that both advocates and proponents use a multitude of strategies aimed at defending or defeating the validity and application of HRD resolutions. This type of contestation matters for HRD because it eventually impacts the ability of defenders to promote and protect human rights on the ground.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"49 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1881049","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41918449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-03DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1879028
A. Markland
ABSTRACT A post-human “transformation thesis” has emerged which posits that global politics is being radically altered by digital technologies and datafication. There is a polemical tendency to generalise about macro-level revolutions in both the techniques of governance and knowledge production across different political spheres, ranging from international security to development, humanitarianism and human rights. By instead applying a meso-level lens on global politics, this article cautions against excessive generalisations about epistemic transformations. It does so by emphasising the ways in which technological changes are mediated through field-specific struggles. This point is illustrated by demonstrating the absence of a radical data revolution within the field of global human rights advocacy. Through a sociological analysis of leading human rights NGOs and their epistemic cultures, it shows how that the field's humanistic sub-culture limits the adoption of novel digital- and data-centric practices.
{"title":"Epistemic Transformation at the Margins: Resistance to Digitalisation and Datafication within Global Human Rights Advocacy","authors":"A. Markland","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1879028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1879028","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A post-human “transformation thesis” has emerged which posits that global politics is being radically altered by digital technologies and datafication. There is a polemical tendency to generalise about macro-level revolutions in both the techniques of governance and knowledge production across different political spheres, ranging from international security to development, humanitarianism and human rights. By instead applying a meso-level lens on global politics, this article cautions against excessive generalisations about epistemic transformations. It does so by emphasising the ways in which technological changes are mediated through field-specific struggles. This point is illustrated by demonstrating the absence of a radical data revolution within the field of global human rights advocacy. Through a sociological analysis of leading human rights NGOs and their epistemic cultures, it shows how that the field's humanistic sub-culture limits the adoption of novel digital- and data-centric practices.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"113 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1879028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45348317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-20DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1875996
Caitlin Hamilton, J. McSwiney, Nyibeny Naam, Laura J. Shepherd
ABSTRACT In the twenty years since the adoption of United Nations Security Council resolution 1325 on “women, peace and security” (in 2000), civil society organisations have continued to shape the agenda's development and work towards its implementation, although geographical and other disparities in recognition, access, and authority over the agenda exist. In this research, we explore the online interactions among civil society organisations working on policy and practice related to the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda. Informed by a postcolonial theoretical framework, and using social network analysis, we analyse data from the Twitter and Facebook accounts of a WPS social network, seeded by social media pages of 21 organisations. Our data suggest that a small group of organisations based in the global North have disproportionate visibility in online activities related to the WPS agenda, and that this has implications for issues of diversity and representation in the network.
{"title":"The Social Life of the Women, Peace and Security Agenda: A Digital Social Network Analysis","authors":"Caitlin Hamilton, J. McSwiney, Nyibeny Naam, Laura J. Shepherd","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1875996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1875996","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the twenty years since the adoption of United Nations Security Council resolution 1325 on “women, peace and security” (in 2000), civil society organisations have continued to shape the agenda's development and work towards its implementation, although geographical and other disparities in recognition, access, and authority over the agenda exist. In this research, we explore the online interactions among civil society organisations working on policy and practice related to the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda. Informed by a postcolonial theoretical framework, and using social network analysis, we analyse data from the Twitter and Facebook accounts of a WPS social network, seeded by social media pages of 21 organisations. Our data suggest that a small group of organisations based in the global North have disproportionate visibility in online activities related to the WPS agenda, and that this has implications for issues of diversity and representation in the network.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1875996","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45254483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-02DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2021.1866149
R. Amer, N. Andrews, Gülşen Aydın, Catherine Baker, Tugba Basaran, Soumita Basu, Sergio Caballero, S. Son
Ramses Amer, Uppsala University; Nathan Andrews, University of Northern British Columbia; Gülşen Aydin, Atatürk Üniversitesi; Catherine Baker, University of Hull; Tugba Basaran, University of Kent; Soumita Basu, South Asian University; Invild Bode, Syddansk Universitet; Chris Brown, London School of Economics; Oldrich Bures, Metropolitní univerzita Praha; Anthony Burke, University of New South Wales; Sergio Caballero, Universidad de Deusto; Emilios Christodoulidis, University of Glasgow; Elaine Coburn, York University; Noé Cornago, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; Elise DeCamp, Western Michigan University; Michael X. Delli Carpini, University of Pennsylvania; Edwin Egede, Cardiff University; David Feltmate, Auburn University at Montgomery; Huiyun Feng, Griffith University; Selina Gallo-Cruz, College of the Holy Cross; Ruben Gonzalez Vicente, Universiteit Leiden; Thorsten Gromes, Hessische Stiftung Friedensund Konfliktforschung; Andrew Hom, University of Edinburgh; Hendrik Huelss, University of Kent; Ahmed Shafiqul Huque, McMaster University; Cristina Juverdeanu, King’s College London;Kai Michael Kenkel, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; Catarina Kinnvall, Lunds universitet; Kriszta Kovács, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung; MariaCaterina La Barbera, Universidad Nebrija; Anthony Lang, University of St Andrews; Paul MacDonald, Wellesley College; Joseph MacKay, Australian National University; Hilary Matfess, Yale University; Luca Mavelli, University of Kent; Christopher McIntosh, Bard College; Frédéric Mégret, McGill University; Elizabeth Mendenhall, University of Rhode Island; Javier Moreno Zacares, University of Warwick; Philip Nel, University of Otago; Cian O’Driscoll, Australian National University; Tony Porter, McMaster University; Elisabeth Prügl, Graduate Institute Geneva; Darren Purcell, University of Oklahoma; Jason Ralph, University of Leeds; Chris Rogers, University of Warwick; Doerthe Rosenow, Oxford Brookes University; Andrea Schneiker, Universität Siegen; Sarah A. Son, University of Sheffield; Brent Steele, University of Utah; Jelena Subotic, Georgia State University; Alex Sutton, Oxford Brookes University; Pawel Surowiec, University of Sheffield; Jacqui True, Monash University; Carolijn van Noort, University of the West of Scotland; Maaike Verbruggen, Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Julia Welland, University of Warwick; Wendy Willems, London School of Economics; Rachel Woodward, Newcastle University.
{"title":"Acknowledgement to Global Society Peer Reviewers","authors":"R. Amer, N. Andrews, Gülşen Aydın, Catherine Baker, Tugba Basaran, Soumita Basu, Sergio Caballero, S. Son","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1866149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1866149","url":null,"abstract":"Ramses Amer, Uppsala University; Nathan Andrews, University of Northern British Columbia; Gülşen Aydin, Atatürk Üniversitesi; Catherine Baker, University of Hull; Tugba Basaran, University of Kent; Soumita Basu, South Asian University; Invild Bode, Syddansk Universitet; Chris Brown, London School of Economics; Oldrich Bures, Metropolitní univerzita Praha; Anthony Burke, University of New South Wales; Sergio Caballero, Universidad de Deusto; Emilios Christodoulidis, University of Glasgow; Elaine Coburn, York University; Noé Cornago, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; Elise DeCamp, Western Michigan University; Michael X. Delli Carpini, University of Pennsylvania; Edwin Egede, Cardiff University; David Feltmate, Auburn University at Montgomery; Huiyun Feng, Griffith University; Selina Gallo-Cruz, College of the Holy Cross; Ruben Gonzalez Vicente, Universiteit Leiden; Thorsten Gromes, Hessische Stiftung Friedensund Konfliktforschung; Andrew Hom, University of Edinburgh; Hendrik Huelss, University of Kent; Ahmed Shafiqul Huque, McMaster University; Cristina Juverdeanu, King’s College London;Kai Michael Kenkel, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; Catarina Kinnvall, Lunds universitet; Kriszta Kovács, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung; MariaCaterina La Barbera, Universidad Nebrija; Anthony Lang, University of St Andrews; Paul MacDonald, Wellesley College; Joseph MacKay, Australian National University; Hilary Matfess, Yale University; Luca Mavelli, University of Kent; Christopher McIntosh, Bard College; Frédéric Mégret, McGill University; Elizabeth Mendenhall, University of Rhode Island; Javier Moreno Zacares, University of Warwick; Philip Nel, University of Otago; Cian O’Driscoll, Australian National University; Tony Porter, McMaster University; Elisabeth Prügl, Graduate Institute Geneva; Darren Purcell, University of Oklahoma; Jason Ralph, University of Leeds; Chris Rogers, University of Warwick; Doerthe Rosenow, Oxford Brookes University; Andrea Schneiker, Universität Siegen; Sarah A. Son, University of Sheffield; Brent Steele, University of Utah; Jelena Subotic, Georgia State University; Alex Sutton, Oxford Brookes University; Pawel Surowiec, University of Sheffield; Jacqui True, Monash University; Carolijn van Noort, University of the West of Scotland; Maaike Verbruggen, Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Julia Welland, University of Warwick; Wendy Willems, London School of Economics; Rachel Woodward, Newcastle University.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"35 1","pages":"(i) - (i)"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1866149","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41396728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：