Education for Primary Care最新文献

Pharmacy CPD in Scotland has been evolving towards online, asynchronous delivery since 2014. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this movement by restricting face-to-face education (Zlotos & Stewart, 2021). This study utilised Google analytics to describe web traffic, and electronic e-learning completion records to describe learner activity on the Virtual Learning Environment of a national CPD provider in Scotland. The aim was to describe patterns of learning activity in the years spanning the COVID-19 pandemic, to help predict what future education practice may look like. This study identified that there was an increase in estimated time spent on learning from 8085.5 vs 16,061.5 hours of learning in 2018-19 and 2020-21, respectively. Completion of non-mandatory clinical modules and mandatory service modules increased each year. Mandatory, service focussed modules were most popular each year and the number of completions peaked to coincide with new services or updated content. The findings suggest asynchronous, online pharmacy education continues to grow in popularity. CPD providers should prioritise Mandatory, Service focussed education for pharmacy staff; although, they cannot neglect non-mandatory and Clinical education too. Future education for CPD should be designed to reflect the growing and diverse learner population.

Background: Newly qualified general practitioners' (NQGPs) experiences of transition to independent practice are varied. Most Irish GP graduates see themselves as either assistant GPs, salaried GPs or locum GPs one year post-qualification, yet anticipate partnership ten years post-qualification. Research into GP trainees' transition to independent practice is scarce, yet perceived lack of preparedness can be associated with emotional exhaustion and burnout.

Aims: To explore NQGPs experience of their transition to independent practice in Ireland.

Methods: A qualitative approach was taken, using virtual, semi-structured, one-to-one interviews with NQGPs within five years of graduation, practising in Ireland. Descriptive demographics of participants were obtained. Audio recordings of interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: NQGPs reported preparedness for their clinical role, but most did not feel prepared for their non-clinical role. While NQGPs regarded independent practice as an intensive step-up from GP training, they drew on the support of GP colleagues during this transition. The decision on job selection centred largely on practice factors including location, ethos, support, and career prospects. Participants continued to develop in their identity as a GP within this transitionary period.

Conclusion: This research provides a unique insight into the experiences of NQGPs in Ireland. Specialist GP training schemes are influential in how NQGPs perceive their preparedness for independent practice; however, external factors including  their place of work and alignment of professional goals play a part in this stage of NQGPs career.

Introduction: UK undergraduate medical curricula are under pressure to become more community-focused and generalist in approach to equip all future doctors with generalist skills and increase recruitment to generalist specialities like general practice. However, the amount of general practice teaching in UK undergraduate curricula is static or falling. Undervaluing, in the form of general practice denigration and undermining, is increasingly recognised from a student perspective. However, little is known about the perspectives of academics working within medical schools.

Aim: To explore the cultural attitudes towards general practice within medical schools as experienced by general practice curriculum leaders.

Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of eight general practice curriculum leaders in UK medical schools. Purposive sampling for diversity was used. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Findings: Seven themes were identified covering 'a kaleidoscope of attitudes towards general practice', 'overt everyday denigration of general practice', 'a hidden curriculum of undervaluing general practice', 'valuing general practice: representation, recognition and respect', 'relating to others, relating to oneself', 'power, empowerment and vulnerability', and 'the pandemic as an opportunity'.

Conclusions: Cultural attitudes towards general practice were diverse: a spectrum varying from valuing general practice to overt denigration, with a 'hidden curriculum' of subtle undervaluing of general practice. Hierarchical, tense relationships between general practice and hospital were a recurring theme. Leadership was identified as important in setting the tone for cultural attitudes, as well as indicating general practice is valued when general practitioners are included within leadership. Recommendations include a shift in narrative from denigration to mutual speciality respect between all doctors.

While GPs are working fewer clinical hours and many GP trainees (registrars) do not foresee themselves working full-time in clinical practice, little is known of the epidemiology of registrars training part-time. We aimed to establish the prevalence of general practice part-time training (PTT), and part-time registrars' characteristics and practice patterns. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training project, an ongoing cohort study of Australian GP registrars' clinical experiences over 60 consecutive consultations in each of three training terms. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted with the outcome 'training part-time'. 1790 registrars contributed data for 4,135 registrar-terms and 241,945 clinical encounters. Nine hundred and twenty-two registrar-terms (22%, 95%CI:21%-24%) and 52,339 clinical encounters (22%, 95%CI:21%-22%) involved PTT. Factors associated with PTT were registrar characteristics - female gender, older age, in a later training stage, performing other regular medical work; practice characteristics - working in a higher socioeconomic status area; and patient characteristics - seeing more patients new to the registrar and seeing more patients from a non-English-speaking background. No consultation or consultation action factors were significantly associated with PTT. Registrars, practices, and patient associations have GP training implications. The lack of registrar consultation or consultation action associations suggests there may be limited impact of PTT on patient care.

Background: In GP training, identifying early predictors of poor summative examination performance can be challenging. We aimed to establish whether external clinical teaching visit (ECTV) performance, measured using a validated instrument (GP Registrar Competency Assessment Grid, GPR-CAG) is predictive of Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Fellowship examination performance.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study including GP registrars in New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory with ECTV data recorded during their first training term (GPT1), between 2014 and 2018, who attempted at least one Fellowship examination. Independent variables of interest included the four GPR-CAG factors assessed in GPT1 ('patient-centredness/caring', 'formulating hypotheses/management plans', 'professional responsibilities', 'physical examination skills'). Outcomes of interest included individual scores of the three summative examinations (Applied Knowledge Test (AKT); Key Feature Problem (KFP); and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)) and overall Pass/Fail status. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed.

Results: Univariably, there were statistically significant associations (p < 0.01) between all four GPR-CAG factors and all four summative examination outcomes, except for 'formulating hypotheses/management plans' and OSCE score (p = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, each factor was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with at least one exam outcome, and 'physical examination skills' was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with all four exam outcomes.

Discussion: ECTV performance, via GPR-CAG scores, is predictive of RACGP Fellowship exam performance. The univariable findings highlight the pragmatic utility of ECTVs in flagging registrars who are at-risk of poor exam performance, facilitating early intervention. The multivariable associations of GPR-CAG scores and examination performance suggest that these scores provide predictive ability beyond that of other known predictors.

Background: Healthcare Quality Improvement (QI) is an essential skill for medical students to acquire, although there is insufficient empirical research which suggests the best educational methods to do this. This study explored the experiences of medical students participating in two versions of a Community Action Project (CAP) which gave medical students the opportunity to learn QI skills in a community setting. The first version (GPCAP) was pre-pandemic where students identified and delivered QI projects on placement in general practice to improve local population health. The second version (Digi-CAP) ran remotely where students worked on QI projects identified by local voluntary sector organisations focused on local community priorities during COVID-19.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with volunteers from the two cohorts of students who had taken part in quality improvement initiatives. Transcriptions were independently coded by two researchers and analysed through thematic analysis.

Results: Sixteen students were interviewed. Whilst students had mixed experiences of completing their CAP, engagement and successful learning was associated with the following themes from the two versions of QI CAP projects: finding a sense of purpose and meaning in QI projects; preparedness for responsibility and service-driven learning; the importance of having supportive partnerships throughout the project duration and making a sustainable difference.

Conclusions and implications: The study provides valuable insights into the design and implementation of these community-based QI projects, which enabled students to learn new and often hard to teach skills, whilst working on projects which have a sustainable impact on local community outcomes.

Clinicians with teaching and training roles should be adequately trained and assessed. However, some debate exists as to what the nature of this training should be. Historically, a postgraduate certificate in education was a pre-requisite to becoming a GP trainer but this is changing with growing concern that such a pre-requisite might act as a deterrent to potential GP trainers. This research examines the impact of a scheme designed to provide an alternative, more practical and focused, pathway to becoming a GP trainer. We interviewed 26 course participants and stakeholders of the London GP Training Course (LGPTC), observed teaching sessions, and analysed course materials. We asked what elements of the course were and weren't effective, for whom, and under what circumstances. Here, we present a summary of our main findings - that GP trainers want to know practically, not theoretically, how to be a trainer; formative assessment boosts trainees' confidence in their own skills and abilities; short, practical GP training courses can help enhance the numbers of GP trainers; important questions remain about the role and value of educational theory in education faculty development.

Background: Telehealth involves real-time communication (telephone or video-call) between patients and health providers. The COVID-19 pandemic propelled general practitioners to conduct most consultations remotely, seeing patients face-to-face only when required. Placement opportunities and experience for medical students were reduced. Initially online learning programmes replaced clinical attachments. Subsequently, clinical teachers supervised students to engage in remote consultations, either in clinics or from their homes. This study aimed to explore the experience of New Zealand general practitioners undertaking clinical teaching with medical students when telehealth consulting.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with general practitioners who had taught medical students whilst consulting remotely. General inductive thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.

Results: Six female and four male participants aged 40 to over 65 years. Participants often focused on general practicalities of telehealth consultations and effects on the patient-doctor relationship, and needed direction to consider remote consultations with students, which added to the interactions. Four themes were identified: changes needed in teaching delivery format; direct comparison with face-to-face; challenges and advantages to remote teaching, each with subthemes.

Discussion: Clinicians needed to determine practical logistics and develop skills for both remote consulting and teaching. New format and structures of consultations needed planning. Differences from face-to-face teaching included scene-setting for the consultation and supervision factors. Telehealth teaching conferred new opportunities for learning but also challenges (e.g. consent, cues, uncertainty). Remote consultations are likely to remain a significant mode for doctor-patient interactions. Preliminary guidelines for teaching and learning using telehealth need to be developed and embedded into medical programmes and then evaluated.