Education for Primary Care最新文献

UK general practice faces workforce challenges. The pandemic, and cost-of-living crisis are felt hardest by our most deprived communities. The Scottish Government is keen to tackle Scotland's high drugs-related deaths. The perceptions and experiences of GP specialist trainees who have trained in deprived communities are already known. This qualitative study explored the perceptions and experiences of trainees from affluent practices and how this training may affect their future career. One-to-one in-depth interviews were conducted and analysed using grounded theory methods. Seven participants were interviewed. Five themes were constructed: training practice choices, perceptions of working in deprived areas, unmet learning needs for working in deprived areas, other sources of deprivation exposure and future working intentions. Most did not choose their training practice because of its affluence. They perceived that working in a deprived area would have challenges: less staff, higher rates of pathology, communication challenges, poorer patient health literacy. Addiction care was a significant unmet learning need. Most lacked confidence to work in deprived areas, and were likely to work in their training practice or similar, upon completion of training. This research has implications for ensuring equity of GP workforce provision and whether GP Specialty Training fulfils its intention of producing 'a GP who is capable of working independently in a variety of primary care settings'. Those training in highly-affluent settings may not feel able to meet this aim. Training providers should consider this limited experience and whether rotations, involving affluent and deprived area practices, would prepare future GPs to work with a range of socioeconomic populations.

Background: There is a workforce crisis in General Practice (GP) within the United Kingdom (UK). High-quality clinical placement experiences in GP influence medical students' interest and likelihood to enter this speciality. GP trainees often express a desire to teach, yet teaching does not feature significantly within their current practice. This study aims to explore outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of GP trainees teaching medical students through a rapid review of published literature.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science were searched for articles relating to GP trainees teaching. Studies conducted in the UK and Australia, between January 2000 and October 2022 were included. The Medical Education Research Study Quality Index and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist were used to assess quality.

Results: Twenty-seven publications, 11 qualitative, six quantitative, three mixed-methods and seven opinion pieces, were identified. Many studies have methodological limitations. Empirical studies show that there are benefits of near-peer teaching, but these are limited by trainees' capacity and capability to teach, and GPs' confidence in trainees' teaching. The culture within the practice influenced whether trainees were seen solely as learners or also as teachers for students.

Discussion: When GP trainees teach there are positive outcomes for medical students and trainees. Teaching was considered an activity that trainees did in 'addition to' rather than 'part' of' their training. Appropriate teaching opportunities, and relevant training, were key to trainees' competence and confidence in teaching. Resources and recognition and a strong teaching culture are needed to support GP trainees to teach.

Purpose: This paper aims to provide knowledge on medical trainees' considerations about specialisation as they move from undergraduate to postgraduate medical education; especially their interest in general practice compared to other specialities.

Method: We developed and content-validated a questionnaire to examine medical trainees' speciality considerations and conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional study. All medical trainees initiating their internship in Denmark in 2022 (N = 1,188) were invited to participate in the study. Medical specialities were categorised as hospital service specialities, internal medicine specialities, primary care, psychiatry specialities and surgery and emergency specialities. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the cohort and examine the participants' speciality considerations by assigning them to one of the following three orientations: committed, undecided or non-committed to a speciality.

Results: The response rate was 38.8% (n = 461), and participants' mean age was 27.4 years with a majority of females (68.1%). Nearly 25% of the participants had general practice as speciality preference, and only 13.9% had excluded general practice for future specialisation. Overall, around half of the participants had general practice as a first, second or third preference for specialisation.

Conclusion: Danish medical trainees show considerable interest in general practice at the time of their transition from undergraduate to postgraduate education. However, to meet future demands on the primary care, further recruitment of general practitioners is still needed. This knowledge of the specialities' recruitment potential will likely be of interest to medical educators and healthcare planners alike.

There is need for a greater connection between General Practice and GP trainees in their hospital component of training. Currently, in Scotland, there are no national education programmes specifically designed for GP trainees during their hospital component of training. Our aim was to develop and evaluate the feasibility of a national online 'bitesize' education programme delivered live for GP trainees in their hospital component of training. The study also aims to assess the barriers to attending these teaching sessions and whether they made trainees feel more connected to General Practice. Weekly one hour 'Bitesize' teaching sessions, delivered virtually, were organised by NHS Education for Scotland (NES) GP Medical Education Fellows during a four-week period. Eligible attendees were GP trainees (GPST1s and GPST2s) working in the hospital component of their training. An end of program questionnaire, gathering quantitative and qualitative data, was used for evaluation. There was a strong support for this programme from the attendance numbers and the questionnaire feedback responses, with GP trainees feeling more in touch with general practice and more confident in managing primary care focused topics. GP trainees agreed that a weekly, one-hour, online lunchtime session suits them. The most common barrier to attendance were work commitments and conflicts with local teaching. This pilot has emphasised the need for a structured teaching programme for GP trainees in the hospital component of training.

The journey of transitioning from a GP trainee to a portfolio GP is a complex and transformative process. This article explores the multi-dimensional roles that GP trainers play in guiding trainees through this key transition. This article, also, aims to challenge readers to consider how GP trainers can further enhance their role in minimising barriers and maximising opportunities for trainees, inviting contributions to the educational discussion on this topic.Serving as mentors, GP trainers navigate trainees through the particulars of general practice, ensuring they are equipped with both skills and resilience. They also play the role of confidantes, offering emotional and psychological support in times of doubt and uncertainty. As anchors, GP trainers provide stability, helping trainees find their footing in the vast domain of general practice and instilling core professional values. Furthermore, bridging the gap between academic knowledge and real-world practice, GP trainers guide trainees in effectively applying theoretical knowledge in clinical scenarios.Despite the inherent challenges, the bond between trainer and trainee is rewarding, ensuring a holistic evolution into competent portfolio GPs, thereby significantly influencing the future of primary care and patient outcomes.

It is well-established that GP trainees do not feel confident when transitioning to independent practice. In 2019, the Nottinghamshire GP Phoenix Programme Trainee Transition Scheme (TTS) was established to improve this transition and encourage local retention of newly qualified GPs. The TTS has been evaluated by surveying a total of 344 trainees from August 2022 to August 2023 using an electronic Google Form. Two-thirds of the trainees surveyed felt the mix of TTS-led non-clinical topics and trainee-led clinical topics taught during their locality time were useful for their learning. 72% felt that the TTS would influence their decision to remain working locally after qualification. Based on these positive findings, it is proposed that the TTS should be adopted in other areas to improve both transition and retention of newly qualified GPs.

Addressing differential attainment between International Medical Graduates (IMGs) and their peers who hold UK Primary Medical Qualifications remains one of the most significant challenges facing postgraduate General Practice (GP) training. Enhanced Induction programme, such as the Scottish Trainee Enhanced Programme (STEP), is one tool designed to try and facilitate transition into training and reduce this inequity. The STEP course is attended by both the trainee and their educational supervisor, and aims to lay the foundations of a successful and supportive supervisory relationship. Previous work has evaluated this programme from the perspective of the trainee. Through the use semi-structured interviews, we evaluated the impact and the benefits of the programme from the perspective of the educational supervisors, building on the literature on interventions to support inequity in medical education.