Education for Primary Care最新文献

The use of point-of-care ultrasonography in primary care is increasing. Primary care physicians are introduced to ultrasonography at short workshops with little guidance for implementation of the technology in clinical routines and medical decision-making. This article introduces a framework for longitudinal ultrasound education tailored for office-based general practice, building on the best available evidence and established teaching principles. The framework includes three teaching seminars over three months, a curriculum of 10 ultrasound applications, an online learning platform providing educational support before, during, and after the teaching seminars and continuous support and feedback from allocated mentors. The framework aims to reduce primary care physicians' absence from the clinic, scaffold the learning process to build a solid and sustainable foundation of knowledge, and support implementation and appropriate use of the technology in the unselected patient population in primary care setting. Evaluation of the framework demonstrated high satisfaction with the educational elements among both participants and teachers.

Background and aims: In the Northwest of England, a national allocation of funding to minimise the effects of differential attainment has been used to support experienced GP educators to act as Differential Attainment Champions (DAC) since October 2021. An evaluation of the role's impact was undertaken.

Methods: The evaluation was designed to gather the views and experiences of DACs and their trainees via online semi-structured interviews during the first 12 months following establishment of the intervention programme.

Results: Thematic framework analysis identified three main themes: DACs' adaptive approach to support trainees; barriers to fulfilling the DAC role; and the positive impact of the DAC role on training. The following aspects of the DAC role worked well: the freedom to tailor support to the individual needs of the trainees; the targeted and proactive support early on in GP core training; the support of trainees in a wide range of areas including e-portfolio advice, examination preparation, and personal help. Trainees valued one-to-one support when needed. Reported improvements included: improved examination outcomes; portfolio engagement recognised in some cases by Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) panels.

Conclusions: The individualised and adaptive approach works well but it does mean it is difficult to quantify how many trainees can be supported by one DAC and their workload needs to be monitored.

Integrated Training Posts (ITPs) were conceived in the 1990s and have recently increased in the Southwest of England. Most ITP evaluations have been small and undertaken over 13 years ago, so do not reflect the current training landscape. This qualitative study aimed to explore the views and experiences of ITPs amongst general practice trainees and educators. The location has increasing numbers of general practice trainees, International Medical Graduates (IMGs) and less-than-full-time trainees. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with six trainees and two educators; all had experienced at least one ITP. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Three themes were identified: 'The role: expectations versus reality', 'Relevance of ITPs to future GP role' and 'Educational Challenges'. Most trainees valued the additional clinical experiences ITPs offered, as well as being able to trial 'portfolio' working. Trainee and educator expectations varied considerably, particularly whether the role was primarily service or observational. Working across multiple settings could limit contact between educator and trainee and make it difficult to identify a struggling trainee. There is a need to clarify the roles of trainees and educators involved in ITPs and whether and how this might vary between posts. Further studies could explore whether choice of ITP influences retention of general practitioners, and whether all trainees including those working less-than-full-time or IMGs benefit from ITPs.

Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LICs) prioritise longitudinal relationships with faculty, patients, and place. Research shows that LICs benefit students and faculty, but most medical schools have limited LIC programmes. This is likely due to perceptions that LICs are more costly and complex than traditional block rotations (TBRs). The perceived cost versus evidence-based value related to clerkship education has not been examined in detail. Until recently, no 'All-LIC' medical school exemplars existed in the US, limiting the value of this model as well as the ability to examine relative cost and complexity. In this paper, we draw on our experience launching three 'All-LIC' medical schools in the United States - schools in which the entire clerkship class participates in a comprehensive clerkship-year LIC. We propose that the known benefits of LICs coupled with cost-mitigation strategies related to running an 'All LIC' model for core clinical clerkships, rather than block and LIC models simultaneously, results in a higher value for medical schools.

Introduction: International Medical Graduates (IMGs) form an important and valued part of the United Kingdom's (UK) medical workforce but many experience difficult transitions into the National Health Service workforce. Mentoring could support IMGs as they transition into their role as General Practice (GP) trainees but there is a lack of evidence about whether mentoring is an effective intervention for this group.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of the NHS Education for Scotland (NES) GP mentoring programme from the perspective of mentors and mentees.

Method: Twelve medical educators (the mentors) provided mentoring to 19 IMG GP trainees (the mentees) who were within their first six months of entering GP training in Scotland. Each mentee received four 60-minute mentoring sessions via video conferencing.

Results: Mentoring provided tailored support to assist IMG GP trainees' holistic transition into UK General Practice. Mentees appreciated talking to a non-supervisor, receiving non-judgemental support and protected time with a supportive listener to overcome challenges. This had a positive impact, even for those who did not anticipate the need for such support. Mentors supported diverse needs and tailored meetings, experiencing a distinct shift from previous supervisor roles. Their diverse experience enhanced their role and they developed new skills.

Conclusion: Mentoring could provide significant support to IMG GP trainees but comes with certain challenges. Future research should evaluate the long-term impact of the NES GP IMG mentoring programme.

Community placements among trainee doctors have proven beneficial in understanding community problems, the role of primary care in health, and increasing the likelihood of pursuing a primary care career, albeit with some challenges. In 2020, Kenya started community rotations as part of the mandatory internship programme. This study aimed to describe the experiences among medical interns and their educational supervisors during the rotation from which insights on how to improve the community rotation may be drawn. A qualitative analysis of 13 in-depth interviews carried out among medical interns and their supervisors was undertaken in the first year of the implementation of the community rotation. Factors that enabled a successful rotation were an increased awareness amongst interns about patient health in the context of the community, presence of existing primary care structures, and the use of technology for patient follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conversely, challenges experienced by participants included insufficient communication prior to implementing the community health rotation, limited community health exposure among medical graduates before the internship, and fear of contracting or spreading COVID-19. The study identified opportunities to improve the community rotation through stakeholder engagement, timely government communication, and strengthening undergraduate medical training in community health competencies.

Introduction: Near-peer teaching offers mutual benefits for clinical trainees and the students they teach. However, General Practice Speciality Trainees (GPSTs) are typically less involved in community-based teaching than their hospital-based peers and often do so without formal pedagogical training. This study details the immediate and longer-term evaluation of a teaching skills course delivered to final year GPSTs. It addresses a gap within existing near-peer literature which, although extensive, is predominantly hospital-based and limited to short-term outcomes.

Methods: The course was designed and delivered to all local final year GPST schemes. Pre- and post-course questionnaires scoring confidence, comfort, and understanding of teaching roles were analysed across two years' delivery. Furthermore, individual interviews of participants 4-6 months after attendance were thematically analysed to explore how GPSTs translated course content into practice.

Results: GPSTs reported a decline in their teaching activities as they embarked on their final year of GP teaching. Immediate post-course teaching-related confidence and knowledge scores increased. However, follow-up interviews revealed that GPSTs' initial enthusiasm was short-lived and outweighed by competing demands within an intensive short-duration training scheme. They expressed concerns about their own learner status as they themselves developed competency in a vast and varied speciality, and cited a lack of support from their trainers.

Conclusions: Teaching skill courses alone are insufficient to address the ongoing challenges of enhancing the teaching role of GPSTs. Further work is now needed to explore multi-level interventions to promote the role of GPSTs as near-peer teachers to harness the mutual benefits to all involved.