Education for Primary Care最新文献

Background: There is an established evidence base to support early clinical experience (ECE) within medical degree programmes. However, increasingly crowded clinical learning environments can make provision challenging. The aim of this research was to develop understanding about how ECE is provided within UK medical schools.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on ECE provision by UK medical schools using an electronic survey containing a mix of question styles. We gathered data on the stage at which ECE featured within curricula, the amount of ECE provided, the setting for ECE, the learning outcomes covered during ECE and whether such content was formally assessed. Support for survey dissemination was obtained from the UK Medical Schools Council (MSC) Education Leads Advisory Group (ELAG). Responses were collected between 10/05/23 and 11/10/23.

Findings: Of the 43 eligible UK medical schools, responses were received from 28 (65%). The provision of ECE amongst respondent medical schools was ubiquitous. The majority of ECE was provided within general practice and hospital settings, but community and voluntary sector settings were increasingly employed, as was technology enhanced ECE. A significant shift in the nature of the content addressed during ECE, with less focus on implementation of basic science was seen within learning outcomes. The extent to which ECE learning outcomes were formally assessed was variable.

Conclusion: The amount of ECE provided by UK medical schools has fallen. We encourage institutions to reflect on their provision of ECE and to consider how greater diversity of community settings and technology-enhanced learning could be harnessed.

Background: Introducing medical students to the concept of Cultural Humility, we devised a teaching initiative for students to consider how power manifests through the use of language in clinical communication, with a focus on General Practice. Cultural Humility is a pedagogical framework, introduced by Tervalon and Murray-Garcia, to address what they consider as the limitations of the Cultural Competence model.

Approach: Our teaching initiative specifically focused on power in clinical communication, both oral consultations and written notes. The session was delivered to third-year medical students during their first 'clinical' year, where they regularly witness and are involved in clinical communication across primary and secondary care placements. Ethical approval was in place to analyse students' reflections on the session.

Evaluation: Students who attended engaged well. They evaluated the session positively as increasing their awareness of the power of clinical language in negatively stereotyping and dehumanising patients. They demonstrated Cultural Humility in their reflections of the unintentional harm of clinical language commonly used for the doctor-patient relationship. However, most striking for us, and where our learning as educators lies, was the low attendance at the session, despite our attempts to underline clinical relevance and importance for development as future doctors.

Implications: This article offers a framework for educators interested in Cultural Humility. The implications of this initiative are how (or how not) to develop and deliver training in this space. More consideration is required as educators, including around our own language, as to how to engage students to think around the complex topic of power.

Reflective practice is fundamental to postgraduate general practitioner (GP) training and ongoing professional development. However, real-world challenges like time constraints and professional isolation often limit meaningful engagement with this critical skill. This article proposes that large language models (LLMs), sophisticated artificial intelligence systems, may have potential for enhancing reflective practice. We present three case studies, in which we explore the ability of LLMs to generate thought-provoking questions, which could prompt GPs to consider new angles, address underlying factors, and bridge the gap between theory and practice. Our findings suggest that LLMs could help reframe experiences and foster deeper self reflection, particularly for isolated practitioners. While ethical concerns regarding privacy, over reliance, and potential biases exist, we consider the possibility of responsibly integrating LLMs into reflective practice. For trainees, AI-generated questions might complement personal reflection under guidance. For GPs working in isolation, LLMs present an opportunity to enhance reflective practice, challenging us to consider a place for this technological innovation without diminishing the human aspects essential to medical practice.

We present a model for delivering out-of-hours (OOH) teaching to year 3 medical students at Glasgow University. Clinical placement time in general practice for students is under unprecedented pressure, and scope to further increase placement capacity in daytime general practice is challenging. The OOH primary care setting is underutilized in Glasgow. We undertook a four-week pilot study based in two OOH centres in Glasgow. Third year medical students could sign up to attend a three-hour teaching session at an OOH site with a dedicated GP tutor. The logistical arrangements and evaluation of this pilot project are presented. Student, GP tutor, OOH staff and administration staff logistics are considered and learning opportunities for students in this setting are discussed. The pilot study received positive feedback from all stakeholders. Our project provides a model for further teaching in this environment to help mitigate placement shortage and provide additional valuable general practice clinical experience for students. The capacity for teaching in the OOH setting could be easily upscaled by either increasing the duration of the placement or utilising more out-of-hours sites for teaching.

The use of point-of-care ultrasonography in primary care is increasing. Primary care physicians are introduced to ultrasonography at short workshops with little guidance for implementation of the technology in clinical routines and medical decision-making. This article introduces a framework for longitudinal ultrasound education tailored for office-based general practice, building on the best available evidence and established teaching principles. The framework includes three teaching seminars over three months, a curriculum of 10 ultrasound applications, an online learning platform providing educational support before, during, and after the teaching seminars and continuous support and feedback from allocated mentors. The framework aims to reduce primary care physicians' absence from the clinic, scaffold the learning process to build a solid and sustainable foundation of knowledge, and support implementation and appropriate use of the technology in the unselected patient population in primary care setting. Evaluation of the framework demonstrated high satisfaction with the educational elements among both participants and teachers.

Background and aims: In the Northwest of England, a national allocation of funding to minimise the effects of differential attainment has been used to support experienced GP educators to act as Differential Attainment Champions (DAC) since October 2021. An evaluation of the role's impact was undertaken.

Methods: The evaluation was designed to gather the views and experiences of DACs and their trainees via online semi-structured interviews during the first 12 months following establishment of the intervention programme.

Results: Thematic framework analysis identified three main themes: DACs' adaptive approach to support trainees; barriers to fulfilling the DAC role; and the positive impact of the DAC role on training. The following aspects of the DAC role worked well: the freedom to tailor support to the individual needs of the trainees; the targeted and proactive support early on in GP core training; the support of trainees in a wide range of areas including e-portfolio advice, examination preparation, and personal help. Trainees valued one-to-one support when needed. Reported improvements included: improved examination outcomes; portfolio engagement recognised in some cases by Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) panels.

Conclusions: The individualised and adaptive approach works well but it does mean it is difficult to quantify how many trainees can be supported by one DAC and their workload needs to be monitored.

Integrated Training Posts (ITPs) were conceived in the 1990s and have recently increased in the Southwest of England. Most ITP evaluations have been small and undertaken over 13 years ago, so do not reflect the current training landscape. This qualitative study aimed to explore the views and experiences of ITPs amongst general practice trainees and educators. The location has increasing numbers of general practice trainees, International Medical Graduates (IMGs) and less-than-full-time trainees. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with six trainees and two educators; all had experienced at least one ITP. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Three themes were identified: 'The role: expectations versus reality', 'Relevance of ITPs to future GP role' and 'Educational Challenges'. Most trainees valued the additional clinical experiences ITPs offered, as well as being able to trial 'portfolio' working. Trainee and educator expectations varied considerably, particularly whether the role was primarily service or observational. Working across multiple settings could limit contact between educator and trainee and make it difficult to identify a struggling trainee. There is a need to clarify the roles of trainees and educators involved in ITPs and whether and how this might vary between posts. Further studies could explore whether choice of ITP influences retention of general practitioners, and whether all trainees including those working less-than-full-time or IMGs benefit from ITPs.

Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LICs) prioritise longitudinal relationships with faculty, patients, and place. Research shows that LICs benefit students and faculty, but most medical schools have limited LIC programmes. This is likely due to perceptions that LICs are more costly and complex than traditional block rotations (TBRs). The perceived cost versus evidence-based value related to clerkship education has not been examined in detail. Until recently, no 'All-LIC' medical school exemplars existed in the US, limiting the value of this model as well as the ability to examine relative cost and complexity. In this paper, we draw on our experience launching three 'All-LIC' medical schools in the United States - schools in which the entire clerkship class participates in a comprehensive clerkship-year LIC. We propose that the known benefits of LICs coupled with cost-mitigation strategies related to running an 'All LIC' model for core clinical clerkships, rather than block and LIC models simultaneously, results in a higher value for medical schools.