Education for Primary Care最新文献

Background: Patients who are annoyed, upset, angry or uncooperative may be categorised as having behavioural problems, shifting the blame from healthcare providers to patients. This can exacerbate the problem. Adopting an empathic approach to such consultations can reduce anger and frustration and improve patient care.

Approach: A pilot teaching session was introduced to the second year of the medical degree at Leicester Medical School with the aim of preparing students to deal with difficult consultations and helping them to understand the impact of empathy in such situations. The teaching involved the use of prior reading, videos and simulated patients acting the role of angry and frustrated patients. It was delivered to groups of 8 students by a team of 20 GP tutors. Approximately 300 second year medical students took part in the session.

Evaluation: Ninety per cent of students felt they had a better understanding of how an empathic approach could help in difficult consultations. Most GP tutors also felt better prepared to deal with difficult consultations because of teaching the session. Following the initial evaluation, a co-production workshop was convened comprising of tutors, students and patient representatives to review the teaching materials and evaluation. Potential improvements to the session were identified.

Conclusion: We were able to deliver a successful pilot session that improved students' understanding of the skills needed and had a positive impact on GP tutors involved in the session. A subsequent co-production workshop identified key strategies to improve the session for future years.

Uncertainty is inherent in all areas of medical practice, not least in primary care, which is defined by its acceptance of uncertainty and complexity. Single best answer (SBA) questions are a ubiquitous assessment tool in undergraduate medical assessments; however clinical practice, particularly in primary care, challenges the supposition that a single best answer exists for all clinical encounters and dilemmas. In this article, we seek to highlight several aspects of the relationship between this assessment format and clinical uncertainty by considering its influence on medical students' views of uncertainty in the contexts of their medical education, personal epistemology, and clinical expectations.

General Practice has changed over the past decade. Expansion of clinicians' roles may create uncertainty, stress, and overload - particular for those at the start of their career. The WONCA Europe network for medical education, EURACT, has published competency-based aims and requirements for speciality training in general practice. Greater understanding of the trainee perspective would support planning and delivery of postgraduate training curricula. This two-step study aims to provide a competency priority list, created by European early career general practitioners, to highlight skills that this generation considers highly essential in future speciality training. A competency list was drafted with trainee- and early career general practitioners from across Europe at the Vasco da Gama Movement Forum (Edinburgh, January 2022). Participants identified competencies that they regarded as most relevant for future speciality training in their respective national contexts. Competencies were coded into categories and ranked in two consecutive rounds, the first taking place online and the second at WONCA Europe (London, June 2022). After two rounds, a consensual list of three main competencies for each category was drafted. The top three competencies for each category remained the same throughout both rounds and may be considered competencies that early career general practitioners in Europe consider important for training. Prioritisation of these competencies by institutions and educators within general practice training programmes may support trainees' satisfaction and perceived preparedness for practice.

Clinical reasoning is a vital medical education skill, yet its nuances in undergraduate primary care settings remain debated. This systematic review explores clinical reasoning teaching and learning intricacies within primary care. We redefine clinical reasoning as dynamically assimilating and prioritising synthesised patient, significant other, or healthcare professional information for diagnoses or non-diagnoses. This focused meta-synthesis applies transformative learning theory to primary care clinical reasoning education. A comprehensive analysis of 29 selected studies encompassing various designs made insights into clinical reasoning learning dimensions visible. Primary care placements in varying duration and settings foster diverse instructional methods like bedside teaching, clinical consultations, simulated clinics, virtual case libraries, and more. This review highlights the interplay between disease-oriented and patient-centred orientations in clinical reasoning learning. Transformative learning theory provides an innovative lens, revealing stages of initiation, persistence, time and space, and competence and confidence in students' clinical reasoning evolution. Clinical teachers guide this transformation, adopting roles as fortifiers, connoisseurs, mediators, and monitors. Patient engagement spans passive to active involvement, co-constructing clinical reasoning. The review underscores theoretical underpinnings' significance in shaping clinical reasoning pedagogy, advocating broader diversity. Intentional student guidance amid primary care complexities is vital. Utilising transformative learning, interventions bridging cognitive boundaries enhance meaningful clinical reasoning learning experiences. This study contributes insights for refining pedagogy, encouraging diverse research, and fostering holistic clinical reasoning development.

In this article NHS England and NHS Education for Scotland describe practical ways we are tackling differences in the attainment of people training as general practitioners (GPs).Trainees from minority ethnic groups and international medical graduates are less likely than others to qualify as GPs. It is difficult to change systemic inequalities, but over the past five years we have made practical changes to GP speciality training. Educators recognise there is an issue and are trying to tackle it.For example, people who had not successfully qualified had an opportunity to return to GP training. When we provided individualised targeted support, the proportion who completed training significantly increased (76%).This was a catalyst for reviewing unconscious bias in GP training. We implemented a national programme to tackle differential attainment and system-level bias. Educators now work with all GP trainees to identify their individual needs. Supervisors are trained to recognise bias and provide targeted support. There is mental health support and regular reviews to see whether trainees are ready to sit exams. Trainee representatives are championing the learner voice in national committees. Exams are being altered to reduce unconscious bias. We are monitoring attainment over time.The key message is that differential attainment should not be in the 'too hard basket'. The narrative is changing from 'can't do' to 'must do', supported by appropriate leadership, promotion and resourcing. There is much more to do, but we are making changes, evaluating and applying our learning. We have moved from talking to taking action.

As 3rd-year medical students at Imperial College London, we investigated Salbutamol overuse in the community of Islington. We were inspired to carry out this project due to the high prevalence of Salbutamol overuse which became evident during our GP placement. This was part of our Community Action Project (CAP) which aims for students to investigate issues within their GP practice and patient population and create solutions to help overcome this, like a quality improvement project. This project focused on the local community around the GP practice. We spoke to 11 patients individually who were at high risk of severe asthma attacks, assessing their understanding of Salbutamol and their Salbutamol usage. Patients had varied responses, with some using their inhaler five times a day, to others using it very rarely. This project gave us newly found insight into the growing issue of Salbutamol overuse. Using the information gathered from these patient interviews, we produced an educational poster about Salbutamol inhaler usage.

Introduction: Effective communication is essential for patient-centred relationships. Although medical graduates acquire communication skills during undergraduate training, these have been shown to be inadequate in early practice. Both students' and patients' perspectives are required to improve readiness for the workplace, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes. Our research question was: to what extent are medical students prepared with patient-centred communication skills in primary care settings?

Methods: A qualitative descriptive research study using in-depth semi-structured interviews was conducted with Year 3 medical students and patients to study their experiences at a primary care clinic, over two weeks. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun and Clark's thematic analysis. Both students' and patients' views on communication skills were obtained.

Results: Three themes were established based on student-patient communication in primary care settings: socio-cultural elements in student-patient communication; cognitive and emotional challenges for effective communication; and enablers for effective student-patient communication. The themes and sub-themes describe both students and patients valuing each other as individuals with socio-cultural beliefs and needs.

Conclusion: The findings can be used to structure new approaches to communication skills education that is patient-centred, culturally sensitive, and informed by patients. Communication skills training should encourage students to prioritise and reflect more on patient perspectives while educators should engage patients to inform and assess the outcomes.