Education for Primary Care最新文献

Background: In GP training, identifying early predictors of poor summative examination performance can be challenging. We aimed to establish whether external clinical teaching visit (ECTV) performance, measured using a validated instrument (GP Registrar Competency Assessment Grid, GPR-CAG) is predictive of Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Fellowship examination performance.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study including GP registrars in New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory with ECTV data recorded during their first training term (GPT1), between 2014 and 2018, who attempted at least one Fellowship examination. Independent variables of interest included the four GPR-CAG factors assessed in GPT1 ('patient-centredness/caring', 'formulating hypotheses/management plans', 'professional responsibilities', 'physical examination skills'). Outcomes of interest included individual scores of the three summative examinations (Applied Knowledge Test (AKT); Key Feature Problem (KFP); and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)) and overall Pass/Fail status. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed.

Results: Univariably, there were statistically significant associations (p < 0.01) between all four GPR-CAG factors and all four summative examination outcomes, except for 'formulating hypotheses/management plans' and OSCE score (p = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, each factor was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with at least one exam outcome, and 'physical examination skills' was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with all four exam outcomes.

Discussion: ECTV performance, via GPR-CAG scores, is predictive of RACGP Fellowship exam performance. The univariable findings highlight the pragmatic utility of ECTVs in flagging registrars who are at-risk of poor exam performance, facilitating early intervention. The multivariable associations of GPR-CAG scores and examination performance suggest that these scores provide predictive ability beyond that of other known predictors.

Background: Healthcare Quality Improvement (QI) is an essential skill for medical students to acquire, although there is insufficient empirical research which suggests the best educational methods to do this. This study explored the experiences of medical students participating in two versions of a Community Action Project (CAP) which gave medical students the opportunity to learn QI skills in a community setting. The first version (GPCAP) was pre-pandemic where students identified and delivered QI projects on placement in general practice to improve local population health. The second version (Digi-CAP) ran remotely where students worked on QI projects identified by local voluntary sector organisations focused on local community priorities during COVID-19.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with volunteers from the two cohorts of students who had taken part in quality improvement initiatives. Transcriptions were independently coded by two researchers and analysed through thematic analysis.

Results: Sixteen students were interviewed. Whilst students had mixed experiences of completing their CAP, engagement and successful learning was associated with the following themes from the two versions of QI CAP projects: finding a sense of purpose and meaning in QI projects; preparedness for responsibility and service-driven learning; the importance of having supportive partnerships throughout the project duration and making a sustainable difference.

Conclusions and implications: The study provides valuable insights into the design and implementation of these community-based QI projects, which enabled students to learn new and often hard to teach skills, whilst working on projects which have a sustainable impact on local community outcomes.

Clinicians with teaching and training roles should be adequately trained and assessed. However, some debate exists as to what the nature of this training should be. Historically, a postgraduate certificate in education was a pre-requisite to becoming a GP trainer but this is changing with growing concern that such a pre-requisite might act as a deterrent to potential GP trainers. This research examines the impact of a scheme designed to provide an alternative, more practical and focused, pathway to becoming a GP trainer. We interviewed 26 course participants and stakeholders of the London GP Training Course (LGPTC), observed teaching sessions, and analysed course materials. We asked what elements of the course were and weren't effective, for whom, and under what circumstances. Here, we present a summary of our main findings - that GP trainers want to know practically, not theoretically, how to be a trainer; formative assessment boosts trainees' confidence in their own skills and abilities; short, practical GP training courses can help enhance the numbers of GP trainers; important questions remain about the role and value of educational theory in education faculty development.

Background: Telehealth involves real-time communication (telephone or video-call) between patients and health providers. The COVID-19 pandemic propelled general practitioners to conduct most consultations remotely, seeing patients face-to-face only when required. Placement opportunities and experience for medical students were reduced. Initially online learning programmes replaced clinical attachments. Subsequently, clinical teachers supervised students to engage in remote consultations, either in clinics or from their homes. This study aimed to explore the experience of New Zealand general practitioners undertaking clinical teaching with medical students when telehealth consulting.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with general practitioners who had taught medical students whilst consulting remotely. General inductive thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.

Results: Six female and four male participants aged 40 to over 65 years. Participants often focused on general practicalities of telehealth consultations and effects on the patient-doctor relationship, and needed direction to consider remote consultations with students, which added to the interactions. Four themes were identified: changes needed in teaching delivery format; direct comparison with face-to-face; challenges and advantages to remote teaching, each with subthemes.

Discussion: Clinicians needed to determine practical logistics and develop skills for both remote consulting and teaching. New format and structures of consultations needed planning. Differences from face-to-face teaching included scene-setting for the consultation and supervision factors. Telehealth teaching conferred new opportunities for learning but also challenges (e.g. consent, cues, uncertainty). Remote consultations are likely to remain a significant mode for doctor-patient interactions. Preliminary guidelines for teaching and learning using telehealth need to be developed and embedded into medical programmes and then evaluated.

Uncertainty is inherent in all areas of medical practice, not least in primary care, which is defined by its acceptance of uncertainty and complexity. Single best answer (SBA) questions are a ubiquitous assessment tool in undergraduate medical assessments; however clinical practice, particularly in primary care, challenges the supposition that a single best answer exists for all clinical encounters and dilemmas. In this article, we seek to highlight several aspects of the relationship between this assessment format and clinical uncertainty by considering its influence on medical students' views of uncertainty in the contexts of their medical education, personal epistemology, and clinical expectations.

Background: Patients who are annoyed, upset, angry or uncooperative may be categorised as having behavioural problems, shifting the blame from healthcare providers to patients. This can exacerbate the problem. Adopting an empathic approach to such consultations can reduce anger and frustration and improve patient care.

Approach: A pilot teaching session was introduced to the second year of the medical degree at Leicester Medical School with the aim of preparing students to deal with difficult consultations and helping them to understand the impact of empathy in such situations. The teaching involved the use of prior reading, videos and simulated patients acting the role of angry and frustrated patients. It was delivered to groups of 8 students by a team of 20 GP tutors. Approximately 300 second year medical students took part in the session.

Evaluation: Ninety per cent of students felt they had a better understanding of how an empathic approach could help in difficult consultations. Most GP tutors also felt better prepared to deal with difficult consultations because of teaching the session. Following the initial evaluation, a co-production workshop was convened comprising of tutors, students and patient representatives to review the teaching materials and evaluation. Potential improvements to the session were identified.

Conclusion: We were able to deliver a successful pilot session that improved students' understanding of the skills needed and had a positive impact on GP tutors involved in the session. A subsequent co-production workshop identified key strategies to improve the session for future years.