Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2257588
Susanna Federici, Gianni Nebbiosi
ABSTRACTIn this article we emphasize that Greek tragedy, surprisingly, can prove to be close to current psychoanalytic practice in exploring the paradoxical dimension of subjectivity. The interweaving of explicit/implicit communication and unconscious dimension in psychoanalytic work gives rise to emergent moments of meaning. Tragedy and psychoanalysis find their value in always striving for truth, at times grasping it, only to lose it and to have to co-construct it all over again. In the figure/background articulation of the spoken, the unspoken, and the unspeakable, it is important to consider words not as labels fixed to define qualities and phenomena, but as living processes that go through exciting twists and turns. The words of therapy are spoken words and are part of a communicative flow that takes place in the interweaving of multiple implicit and explicit channels involving all the senses: voice quality, rhythm, sound, gaze, emotionally activated body. We have been interested in rhythm in the clinical exchange and we have delved into the study of imitation as the primary vehicle of implicit relational knowing and the transmission of pragmatic knowledge embodying ways of being in the world at very deep and procedural levels. A short vignette and a clinical case illustrate how the tool of mimesis proves useful in activating and improving our clinical sensitivity.KEYWORDS: MimesisGreek tragedyembodimentmultiplicityimplicit/explicit clinical process Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSusanna FedericiSusanna Federici, Ph.D., is founding member, Faculty, supervising and training analyst of ISIPSÉ (Institute for Self Psychology and Relational Psychoanalysis, Italy); President of IARPP (International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy); and Past Member International Council of IAPSP (International Association Psychoanalytic Self Psychology).Gianni NebbiosiGianni Nebbiosi, Ph.D., is President, founding member, supervising and training analyst, of ISIPSÉ (Institute for Self Psychology and Relational Psychoanalysis, Italy); Founding and Board Member of IARPP (International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy); Member International Council of IAPSP (International Association for Psychoanalytic Self Psychology); Member Editorial Board of the journal Psychoanalytic Dialogues; and Member Editorial Board of the journal Psychoanalytic Inquiry.
{"title":"Mimetic Understanding: The Embodied Dance of Words and Action","authors":"Susanna Federici, Gianni Nebbiosi","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2257588","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2257588","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn this article we emphasize that Greek tragedy, surprisingly, can prove to be close to current psychoanalytic practice in exploring the paradoxical dimension of subjectivity. The interweaving of explicit/implicit communication and unconscious dimension in psychoanalytic work gives rise to emergent moments of meaning. Tragedy and psychoanalysis find their value in always striving for truth, at times grasping it, only to lose it and to have to co-construct it all over again. In the figure/background articulation of the spoken, the unspoken, and the unspeakable, it is important to consider words not as labels fixed to define qualities and phenomena, but as living processes that go through exciting twists and turns. The words of therapy are spoken words and are part of a communicative flow that takes place in the interweaving of multiple implicit and explicit channels involving all the senses: voice quality, rhythm, sound, gaze, emotionally activated body. We have been interested in rhythm in the clinical exchange and we have delved into the study of imitation as the primary vehicle of implicit relational knowing and the transmission of pragmatic knowledge embodying ways of being in the world at very deep and procedural levels. A short vignette and a clinical case illustrate how the tool of mimesis proves useful in activating and improving our clinical sensitivity.KEYWORDS: MimesisGreek tragedyembodimentmultiplicityimplicit/explicit clinical process Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSusanna FedericiSusanna Federici, Ph.D., is founding member, Faculty, supervising and training analyst of ISIPSÉ (Institute for Self Psychology and Relational Psychoanalysis, Italy); President of IARPP (International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy); and Past Member International Council of IAPSP (International Association Psychoanalytic Self Psychology).Gianni NebbiosiGianni Nebbiosi, Ph.D., is President, founding member, supervising and training analyst, of ISIPSÉ (Institute for Self Psychology and Relational Psychoanalysis, Italy); Founding and Board Member of IARPP (International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy); Member International Council of IAPSP (International Association for Psychoanalytic Self Psychology); Member Editorial Board of the journal Psychoanalytic Dialogues; and Member Editorial Board of the journal Psychoanalytic Inquiry.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135788957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2257582
Philip Ringstrom
ABSTRACTBeginning with a fantasy interview with Donald Winnicott and William Shakespeare – one in which Winnicott espouses the essential nature of play in psychoanalysis – he then joins Shakespeare in finding a promising set of ideas for psychoanalytic play. These ideas arise out of Shakespeare’s theatrical, play-full world of drama and narrative. Both these sets of ideas then build upon an epistemology based on an information theory of change in psychoanalytic therapy – one which asserts that change is a constant in every living system, and therefore the field of every session of therapy. Thus, in every developing psychotherapy, there becomes an emerging, often unknown “architecture” involving what is ceaselessly changing. This quality of change preserves some basis of order in any treatment (e.g. 1st Order Change). In effect, it is responsible for “keeping the system the ‘same.’” 1st Order Change involves the often unwitting “premises” upon which aspects of both the treatment narrative and drama are organized. It contrasts to a different kind of change (2nd Order Change) which radically changes some of the organizing assumptions (“premises”) of the therapy. 2nd Order Change typically emerges in an unwitting, unpredictable manner, catching both analytic participants by surprise. In other articles over the past two decades, the author has described this in terms of theory about improvisation. Optimizing the creative genius of such moments of play, requires that therapists immerse themselves in the field, in a non-presumptive “bottom-up” phenomenological experiential manner in contrast to the historical “top-down” “prejudices” that the history of theory and practice – within psychoanalysis and from without – often dictate, in terms of what becomes searched for and interpreted. Two case illustrations examine what can emerge when unwitting, unpredictable, preconscious moments of improvising emerge, with unpredictable aspects in entities such as character, narrative, script and so forth. This broad coalescence of ideas leads to the creation of moments of the “heretofore unimaginable” rather than what seems more like the expectable and predictable 1st Order Change world orders most treatments.KEYWORDS: Psychoanalytic playdramanarrationimprovisation1st and 2nd order theory of change Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Both have been tremendous inspirations to the book I am writing, Psychoanalytic Play: Drama, Narration and Improvisation in Field Theory and Metapsychology. The goal of my book is to legitimize play as an actual mode of therapeutic action, available to all psychoanalysts. Doing so entails filling in what I believe has been sorely missing on the topic of psychoanalytic play. Indeed, I am arguing that there are three subjects critical to locating play at the center of psychoanalytic theory and practice, which is in the spirit of what I believe Winnicott and others have sought.2 Key to this
从他们的对峙中,他们的冲突变得完全生动,解释了他们的角色,以及一个新兴的“情节”和场景的解决方案——到目前为止,他们彼此和观众都完全不知道,因为它在场景开始之前并不存在。它的创造完全依赖于他们的无意识思维在开发场景时相互“提供”。然而,无论演员在场景中创造了什么,也复制了一些从他们各自的无意识中出现的东西,因为这些都不是准备好的或可预测的。这是精神分析治疗的典范,当它被允许是好玩的,呼应Bion的告诫,开始每一个治疗过程,就好像分析师和病人从来没有见过面一样(Bion, Citation1967)它们的出现立即将我们提升到一个抽象的水平,通过提高我们从“自上而下”的偏见中看待它,将我们从更现象学上直接的治疗领域经验中拉出来。这种情况经常发生,即使是在自称“自上而下”的最热心的临床医生中。当然,经验告诉我们,当我们冒险进入未知的、被禁止的思想领域时,可能会有许多无法预料的后果。然而,这不应该阻止我们。相反,它成为一种非常丰富的手段,以无数的方式激发新鲜的,尽管可怕的对话,否则可能不会出现这些即兴的时刻可以作为“模型场景”(Lichtenberg et al., Citation1992)重新引入,代表了一些被认为是如此受限的事情,直到它真正发生才可能发生。它的发生可以成为未来的参考点,而不是简单地回到一些“受约束的”情感信念中。它激发了指出“迄今为止不可能”如何成为“可能”的可能性——它实际上确实发生了。这就引出了一个问题,为什么这样的事情不会再次发生呢?回想起来,我的“三岁的角色”要求“你答应过”的根源,很可能是无意识地在玩早期的会话,杰伊告诉我,吸大麻是“承诺的‘奖励’”,因为他在工作、婚姻和家庭生活中都病态地适应这个世界这是我在书中的场理论部分探讨的一个问题,包括大脑的左右半球如何相互依赖地处理我们对场的经验的信息尤其有意义的是,杰伊不仅能够控制自己的毒瘾并保持清醒,而且在相当长的时间内,我还有另外两个40多岁的男性病人戒掉了饮酒和吸食大麻。在这三个案例中,这些都是他们从青春期开始就有的瘾。他们都不需要任何形式的12步计划或康复治疗。也许最重要的是,在治疗中发生了一些事情,使我们进入了一种真实的自我性格的准备状态。在治疗中出现的一种紧急状态,当他们终于开始觉得准备好停止治疗时,他们终于完全投入并能够以一种对他们三个都有意义的方式进行治疗这是照顾者和婴儿最初的游戏,建立在新生的主体间性的基础上,这是“正常”发展的一部分。它最终建立在一种主体间关系的主体间关系的发展上。就我所记得的,我从来没有告诉过萨米他应该有什么感觉。这就引出了一个有趣的问题,史蒂夫·米切尔经常提出的一个问题,那就是我可能无意中以非语言的方式透露了我想知道萨米可能有,或可能有,或可能难以经历的一系列感受,以及我的面部表情如何暗示了这一点,作为一种隐含的指示?“菲尔医生”是一位电视名人心理治疗师,在对他的客座病人的日常问题进行了最小的探索之后,他立即在广告时间和节目的片尾字幕之间提供大量的日常建议。作者简介:philip Ringstrom, Ph.D. p . d .。他是加州洛杉矶当代精神分析研究所的高级培训和监督分析师和教员。他是IARPP董事会的创始成员,也是国际自我心理学家理事会的成员。他是《精神分析对话》、《精神分析视角》和《精神分析:自我与环境》的编委会成员。他发表了60多篇文章、章节和评论,并在世界各地的会议上发表过演讲。他的著作《联合治疗的关系精神分析方法》(Routledge出版社,2014)获得2014年精神分析学歌德奖。 他目前正在撰写一本名为《精神分析戏剧:场理论和元心理学中的戏剧化、叙事和即兴创作》的新书。
{"title":"Drama and Narration: The Architecture of Psychoanalytic Play","authors":"Philip Ringstrom","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2257582","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2257582","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBeginning with a fantasy interview with Donald Winnicott and William Shakespeare – one in which Winnicott espouses the essential nature of play in psychoanalysis – he then joins Shakespeare in finding a promising set of ideas for psychoanalytic play. These ideas arise out of Shakespeare’s theatrical, play-full world of drama and narrative. Both these sets of ideas then build upon an epistemology based on an information theory of change in psychoanalytic therapy – one which asserts that change is a constant in every living system, and therefore the field of every session of therapy. Thus, in every developing psychotherapy, there becomes an emerging, often unknown “architecture” involving what is ceaselessly changing. This quality of change preserves some basis of order in any treatment (e.g. 1st Order Change). In effect, it is responsible for “keeping the system the ‘same.’” 1st Order Change involves the often unwitting “premises” upon which aspects of both the treatment narrative and drama are organized. It contrasts to a different kind of change (2nd Order Change) which radically changes some of the organizing assumptions (“premises”) of the therapy. 2nd Order Change typically emerges in an unwitting, unpredictable manner, catching both analytic participants by surprise. In other articles over the past two decades, the author has described this in terms of theory about improvisation. Optimizing the creative genius of such moments of play, requires that therapists immerse themselves in the field, in a non-presumptive “bottom-up” phenomenological experiential manner in contrast to the historical “top-down” “prejudices” that the history of theory and practice – within psychoanalysis and from without – often dictate, in terms of what becomes searched for and interpreted. Two case illustrations examine what can emerge when unwitting, unpredictable, preconscious moments of improvising emerge, with unpredictable aspects in entities such as character, narrative, script and so forth. This broad coalescence of ideas leads to the creation of moments of the “heretofore unimaginable” rather than what seems more like the expectable and predictable 1st Order Change world orders most treatments.KEYWORDS: Psychoanalytic playdramanarrationimprovisation1st and 2nd order theory of change Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Both have been tremendous inspirations to the book I am writing, Psychoanalytic Play: Drama, Narration and Improvisation in Field Theory and Metapsychology. The goal of my book is to legitimize play as an actual mode of therapeutic action, available to all psychoanalysts. Doing so entails filling in what I believe has been sorely missing on the topic of psychoanalytic play. Indeed, I am arguing that there are three subjects critical to locating play at the center of psychoanalytic theory and practice, which is in the spirit of what I believe Winnicott and others have sought.2 Key to this","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135788961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2257580
Alan Michael Karbelnig
ABSTRACTExtending psychoanalysis-drama comparisons proffered by prior theorists, Dr. Karbelnig introduces the novel concept of the psychoanalytic denouement. He differentiates these from Aristotle’s concepts of anagnorisis and peripeteia, and he compares them to phenomenon like Satori from Zen Buddhism or the “Aha” moment from the contemporary lexicon. Transcripts from three consecutive sessions (completely anonymized) demonstrate psychoanalytic denouements. Two sessions show clear psychoanalytic denouements; one, featuring an overtly psychotic patient, reveals intense emotional expression and cognitive insight but no psychoanalytic denouement. These clinical samples illustrate how theatrical metaphors incorporate phenomenological and theoretical perspectives, allow for micro- or macroscopic studies of psychoanalytic encounters, and confirm their inimitable nature. Dr. Karbelnig concludes by noting these analogies to drama helpfully expand extant metapsychology but, like all theories of mind, necessarily fall short.KEYWORDS: Dramatheaterpsychoanalyst-as-dramatistpsychoanalytic denouementfairbairntransformation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAlan Michael KarbelnigAlan Michael Karbelnig, Ph.D., ABPP, a training and supervising psychoanalyst, provides psychoanalytically oriented individual and couples psychotherapy in Pasadena, California. Board certified in forensic psychology, he also offers psycho-legal services in the realms of administrative and employment law. He earned doctorates in Counseling Psychology from the University of Southern California (USC) and in Psychoanalysis from the New Center for Psychoanalysis (NCP). He founded Rose City Center (RCC)—a not-for-profit psychoanalytic clinic serving economically disadvantaged individuals in California.
摘要:Karbelnig博士扩展了先前理论家提出的精神分析与戏剧的比较,引入了精神分析结局的新概念。他将这些与亚里士多德的anagnorisis和peripeteia概念区分开来,并将它们与禅宗中的顿悟或当代词汇中的“顿悟”时刻等现象进行了比较。三个连续会议的记录(完全匿名)证明了精神分析的结果。两次会议显示出明确的精神分析结果;其中一个是一个明显的精神病患者,表现出强烈的情感表达和认知洞察力,但没有精神分析的结局。这些临床样本说明了戏剧隐喻如何结合现象学和理论视角,允许微观或宏观的精神分析遭遇研究,并证实了它们的不可模仿性。Karbelnig博士最后指出,这些与戏剧的类比有助于扩展现有的元心理学,但就像所有的心理理论一样,必然存在不足。关键词:戏剧;精神分析学家;精神分析的结局;alan Michael Karbelnig, ABPP博士,培训和监督精神分析学家,在加州帕萨迪纳提供以精神分析为导向的个人和夫妻心理治疗。他获得了法医心理学认证,还在行政和就业法领域提供心理法律服务。他在南加州大学(USC)获得咨询心理学博士学位,在新精神分析中心(NCP)获得精神分析博士学位。他创立了玫瑰城市中心(RCC),这是一家非营利性的精神分析诊所,为加利福尼亚的经济弱势群体提供服务。
{"title":"The Psychoanalyst as Dramatist","authors":"Alan Michael Karbelnig","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2257580","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2257580","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTExtending psychoanalysis-drama comparisons proffered by prior theorists, Dr. Karbelnig introduces the novel concept of the psychoanalytic denouement. He differentiates these from Aristotle’s concepts of anagnorisis and peripeteia, and he compares them to phenomenon like Satori from Zen Buddhism or the “Aha” moment from the contemporary lexicon. Transcripts from three consecutive sessions (completely anonymized) demonstrate psychoanalytic denouements. Two sessions show clear psychoanalytic denouements; one, featuring an overtly psychotic patient, reveals intense emotional expression and cognitive insight but no psychoanalytic denouement. These clinical samples illustrate how theatrical metaphors incorporate phenomenological and theoretical perspectives, allow for micro- or macroscopic studies of psychoanalytic encounters, and confirm their inimitable nature. Dr. Karbelnig concludes by noting these analogies to drama helpfully expand extant metapsychology but, like all theories of mind, necessarily fall short.KEYWORDS: Dramatheaterpsychoanalyst-as-dramatistpsychoanalytic denouementfairbairntransformation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAlan Michael KarbelnigAlan Michael Karbelnig, Ph.D., ABPP, a training and supervising psychoanalyst, provides psychoanalytically oriented individual and couples psychotherapy in Pasadena, California. Board certified in forensic psychology, he also offers psycho-legal services in the realms of administrative and employment law. He earned doctorates in Counseling Psychology from the University of Southern California (USC) and in Psychoanalysis from the New Center for Psychoanalysis (NCP). He founded Rose City Center (RCC)—a not-for-profit psychoanalytic clinic serving economically disadvantaged individuals in California.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135789165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2257586
Henry Zvi Lothane
ABSTRACTThe author revisits his previous papers on dramatology published in 2009, 2011, and 2015, adding the results of new research. The additions are ideas about dramatic action by philosophers William James and John Dewey and literary theorist Kenneth Burke. There is a new discussion of the relation between dramatology and narratology. The approach is a retrospective application of dramatization to Freud’s method in analyzing the famous cases of Dora and Schreber. A new finding is dramatization in DSM-5 diagnoses. Another new interest is applying dramatology to Freud’s mass psychology and world-wide events as dramas of history.KEYWORDS: Actdramadramatizationdramatologynarratologytrauma Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsHenry Zvi LothaneHenry Zvi Lothane, M.D., is Clinical Professor at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Distinguished Life Member of American Psychiatric Association, and Member of International Psychoanalytical Association and American Psychoanalytic Association. He is the author of In Defense of Schreber: Soul Murder in Psychiatry and a new book on Sabina Spielrein, in press. He was also the guest editor of Psychoanalytic Inquiry Volume 38, Number 6, “Free Association.”
{"title":"Dramatology Revisited: The Person as Doer and Dreamer","authors":"Henry Zvi Lothane","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2257586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2257586","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe author revisits his previous papers on dramatology published in 2009, 2011, and 2015, adding the results of new research. The additions are ideas about dramatic action by philosophers William James and John Dewey and literary theorist Kenneth Burke. There is a new discussion of the relation between dramatology and narratology. The approach is a retrospective application of dramatization to Freud’s method in analyzing the famous cases of Dora and Schreber. A new finding is dramatization in DSM-5 diagnoses. Another new interest is applying dramatology to Freud’s mass psychology and world-wide events as dramas of history.KEYWORDS: Actdramadramatizationdramatologynarratologytrauma Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsHenry Zvi LothaneHenry Zvi Lothane, M.D., is Clinical Professor at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Distinguished Life Member of American Psychiatric Association, and Member of International Psychoanalytical Association and American Psychoanalytic Association. He is the author of In Defense of Schreber: Soul Murder in Psychiatry and a new book on Sabina Spielrein, in press. He was also the guest editor of Psychoanalytic Inquiry Volume 38, Number 6, “Free Association.”","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135788963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2257584
Daniel Goldin
ABSTRACTDrawing on Aristotle’s Poetics and my work as a screenwriter in Hollywood, I look to some commonalities in the ways dramatists and psychoanalysts generate meaning through action and interactions. These ways include an attention to the interweave of text and subtext, a sense of rhythm and timing, an inquisitive stance and an interest in reversals and the recognition that follows.KEYWORDS: Narrativerecognitionrhythmsubtextquestioningvitality affects Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDaniel GoldinDaniel Goldin, MFT, Psy.D., serves as editor of Psychoanalytic Inquiry and associate editor of Psychoanalysis: Self and Context. He has written numerous articles for Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Psychoanalysis: Self and Context and Psychoanalytic Inquiry. His book Storying: Bringing Nature, Nurture and Culture Together in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life will be published by Routledge early next year.
{"title":"What Aristotle and Hollywood Taught Me About Psychoanalysis","authors":"Daniel Goldin","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2257584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2257584","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDrawing on Aristotle’s Poetics and my work as a screenwriter in Hollywood, I look to some commonalities in the ways dramatists and psychoanalysts generate meaning through action and interactions. These ways include an attention to the interweave of text and subtext, a sense of rhythm and timing, an inquisitive stance and an interest in reversals and the recognition that follows.KEYWORDS: Narrativerecognitionrhythmsubtextquestioningvitality affects Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDaniel GoldinDaniel Goldin, MFT, Psy.D., serves as editor of Psychoanalytic Inquiry and associate editor of Psychoanalysis: Self and Context. He has written numerous articles for Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Psychoanalysis: Self and Context and Psychoanalytic Inquiry. His book Storying: Bringing Nature, Nurture and Culture Together in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life will be published by Routledge early next year.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135788958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2258060
Robin Weigert
ABSTRACTDrawing on my work as an actor, I make a case for the importance of a dialogue between actors and analysts about the aspect of an actor’s creative process I experience as listening a character into being. It’s my contention that, since actors and analysts both extend an invitation through our listening, there is vast territory the two professions share in common with far-reaching implications.KEYWORDS: Listeningrecognitionrolethirdcharacterattunement Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRobin WeigertRobin Weigert, MFA, BA, is known as a film and television actress with exceptional range and versatility. Most recognizable from her Emmy-nominated portrayal of the iconic gunslinger ‘Calamity Jane’ in Deadwood (the series and the recent movie revival for HBO), Weigert played therapists in the box office hit Smile and opposite Nicole Kidman in the much-lauded SAG 2020 Best Ensemble contender Big Little Lies, attorneys in the popular cabler Sons of Anarchy and Jay Roach’s biographical drama Bombshell and strippers in Charley Kaufman’s Synecdoche, New York and Steven Soderbergh’s black-and-white period drama The Good German. She was nominated for a Gotham Award for her portrayal of a housewife turned prostitute, the central character in the award-winning indie Concussion, and will soon be featured prominently in a miniseries for Hulu as the matriarch of a Polish Jewish family that survived the Holocaust in We Were the Lucky Ones. Series regular roles include Dietland for AMC with Julianna Marguiles, NBC’s Life with Damien Lewis and the upcoming CBS show Tracker with Kevin Hartley for exec producers Ken Olin and Ben Winters.
【摘要】以我作为演员的工作为例,我认为演员和分析家之间对话的重要性在于我所经历的一个演员的创作过程是倾听一个角色的存在。我的观点是,既然演员和分析师都是通过我们的倾听发出邀请的,那么这两个职业就有很多共同之处,影响深远。关键词:听力识别第三特征披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。附加信息撰稿人备注罗宾·魏格特,艺术硕士,文学学士,被称为电影和电视女演员与特殊的范围和多才多艺。韦格特因在《死木》(Deadwood)中饰演标志性的枪手“Calamity Jane”而获得艾美奖提名,并在票房大热的《微笑》(Smile)中饰演治疗师,在备受赞誉的2020年美国演员工会(SAG)最佳演员组合角逐中与妮可·基德曼演对手戏,在热门有线电视《混乱之子》(Sons of Anarchy)和杰伊·罗奇(Jay Roach)的传记剧《性感炸弹》(Bombshell)中饰演律师,在查理·考夫曼(Charley Kaufman)的《提法》(Synecdoche)中饰演脱衣舞女。纽约和史蒂文·索德伯格的黑白历史剧《好德国人》。她因在获奖的独立电影《震荡》(Concussion)中饰演一名从家庭主妇变成妓女的角色而获得了高谭奖(Gotham Award)提名,并很快将在Hulu的一部迷你剧中扮演一个在大屠杀中幸存下来的波兰犹太家庭的女家长。剧中的常规角色包括AMC电视台与朱莉安娜·玛格莱斯合作的《Dietland》,NBC电视台与达米安·刘易斯的《Life with Damien Lewis》,以及即将上映的CBS电视台由执行制片人肯·奥林和本·温特斯与凯文·哈特利合作的《Tracker》。
{"title":"Listening into Being","authors":"Robin Weigert","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2258060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2258060","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDrawing on my work as an actor, I make a case for the importance of a dialogue between actors and analysts about the aspect of an actor’s creative process I experience as listening a character into being. It’s my contention that, since actors and analysts both extend an invitation through our listening, there is vast territory the two professions share in common with far-reaching implications.KEYWORDS: Listeningrecognitionrolethirdcharacterattunement Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRobin WeigertRobin Weigert, MFA, BA, is known as a film and television actress with exceptional range and versatility. Most recognizable from her Emmy-nominated portrayal of the iconic gunslinger ‘Calamity Jane’ in Deadwood (the series and the recent movie revival for HBO), Weigert played therapists in the box office hit Smile and opposite Nicole Kidman in the much-lauded SAG 2020 Best Ensemble contender Big Little Lies, attorneys in the popular cabler Sons of Anarchy and Jay Roach’s biographical drama Bombshell and strippers in Charley Kaufman’s Synecdoche, New York and Steven Soderbergh’s black-and-white period drama The Good German. She was nominated for a Gotham Award for her portrayal of a housewife turned prostitute, the central character in the award-winning indie Concussion, and will soon be featured prominently in a miniseries for Hulu as the matriarch of a Polish Jewish family that survived the Holocaust in We Were the Lucky Ones. Series regular roles include Dietland for AMC with Julianna Marguiles, NBC’s Life with Damien Lewis and the upcoming CBS show Tracker with Kevin Hartley for exec producers Ken Olin and Ben Winters.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135789163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235261
Monisha Nayar-Akhtar
ABSTRACTThe relationship between one’s home and its internal representation is a complex one. Imbued with memories of desire, loss, fear and anxiety, these often emerge in the analytic space and wait for interpretation and understanding. The analysts’ ability to use their countertransference and explore the patient’s underlying feelings often reveals the impact of culture and surround on the patient’s contemporary experience of space.KEYWORDS: Cultural homespsychic spacearchitectural spaceidentity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMonisha Nayar-AkhtarMonisha Nayar-Akhtar, Ph.D., obtained her Masters and Ph.D. in clinical psychology from Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan. Later, she trained at the Michigan Psychoanalytic Institute in adult and child/adolescent analysis. After practicing for over twenty years in Southfield, Michigan, she relocated to suburban Philadelphia. Currently, she is affiliated with the Psychoanalytic Center of Philadelphia where she is a Training and Supervising Analyst. She is an active member of the American Psychoanalytic Association where she served as a member of the Program committee until 2020 and as chair of the Clinical Workshop on Child and Adolescent Psychoanalysis until 2018. She has a keen interest in Applied Psychoanalysis and in promoting psychoanalytic thinking in India, her country of origin. Her current projects include providing ongoing clinical training workshops in trauma and attachment to psychotherapists working with children and adolescents. In 2018, she established the Indian American Psychoanalytic Alliance in Philadelphia, a nonprofit organization that provided a two-year distance learning program in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Her current project includes training therapists in early intervention and establishing a Therapeutic Play Center to provide therapies for disturbed children between the ages of 2 and 6. She has edited two books: One titled Play and Playfulness and the other titled Identities in Transition. She is the editor-in-chief of a journal Institutionalised Children: Explorations and Beyond, which she, as its editor in chief, helped launch in May 2014. This peer reviewed journal, published by Sage Publications, presents papers from the SAARC region on issues pertinent to children and adolescents who are orphaned or in need of care and protection. She is on the editorial board of The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child and Adolescent as well. She is a recipient of the Ticho Award and presented a paper titled “Psychic Space, Structural Space, Cyber Space, Desire and Intimacy in a Digital World,” in Chicago, 2016, during the spring meetings of the American Psychoanalytic Association. Dr. Akhtar is in private practice and has an office in Center City, Philadelphia.
{"title":"The Complex Relationship between Structural and Psychic Space: When Two Cultures/Homes Collide","authors":"Monisha Nayar-Akhtar","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235261","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe relationship between one’s home and its internal representation is a complex one. Imbued with memories of desire, loss, fear and anxiety, these often emerge in the analytic space and wait for interpretation and understanding. The analysts’ ability to use their countertransference and explore the patient’s underlying feelings often reveals the impact of culture and surround on the patient’s contemporary experience of space.KEYWORDS: Cultural homespsychic spacearchitectural spaceidentity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMonisha Nayar-AkhtarMonisha Nayar-Akhtar, Ph.D., obtained her Masters and Ph.D. in clinical psychology from Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan. Later, she trained at the Michigan Psychoanalytic Institute in adult and child/adolescent analysis. After practicing for over twenty years in Southfield, Michigan, she relocated to suburban Philadelphia. Currently, she is affiliated with the Psychoanalytic Center of Philadelphia where she is a Training and Supervising Analyst. She is an active member of the American Psychoanalytic Association where she served as a member of the Program committee until 2020 and as chair of the Clinical Workshop on Child and Adolescent Psychoanalysis until 2018. She has a keen interest in Applied Psychoanalysis and in promoting psychoanalytic thinking in India, her country of origin. Her current projects include providing ongoing clinical training workshops in trauma and attachment to psychotherapists working with children and adolescents. In 2018, she established the Indian American Psychoanalytic Alliance in Philadelphia, a nonprofit organization that provided a two-year distance learning program in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Her current project includes training therapists in early intervention and establishing a Therapeutic Play Center to provide therapies for disturbed children between the ages of 2 and 6. She has edited two books: One titled Play and Playfulness and the other titled Identities in Transition. She is the editor-in-chief of a journal Institutionalised Children: Explorations and Beyond, which she, as its editor in chief, helped launch in May 2014. This peer reviewed journal, published by Sage Publications, presents papers from the SAARC region on issues pertinent to children and adolescents who are orphaned or in need of care and protection. She is on the editorial board of The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child and Adolescent as well. She is a recipient of the Ticho Award and presented a paper titled “Psychic Space, Structural Space, Cyber Space, Desire and Intimacy in a Digital World,” in Chicago, 2016, during the spring meetings of the American Psychoanalytic Association. Dr. Akhtar is in private practice and has an office in Center City, Philadelphia.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235259
Julie Jaffee Nagel
ABSTRACTThis article will explore some of the ways I conceptualize music as it pertains to the concept of “home,” and specifically here, about leaving home. Using composer Sergei Prokofiev’s music in his well-known beloved composition, Peter and the Wolf, I will illustrate the gradual integration and consolidation of identity in the eponymous character, Peter, as he left his childhood garden home. Thus, the analysis of music itself as a primary source of psychoanalytic data is the distinctive method of analysis that I bring to my interdisciplinary explorations. Prokofiev’s masterpiece Peter and the Wolf pertains to the following overdetermined themes: Music and psychoanalytic concepts hold enduring value as each informs and enriches the other. Music serves as an important entry into affect and unconscious processes. Music and psychoanalytic principles are relevant both inside and beyond the concert hall and consulting room and contribute to a nuanced understanding of our inner lives.KEYWORDS: Psychological developmentErik Eriksonindividuationmusical themesaffectsinstrumentationorchestrationProkofievPeter and the Wolf AcknowledgmentsThis paper is dedicated both to my oldest granddaughter, Sarah Esther Lewis, who just left home to become a college freshman as I was writing this article, and to our youngest granddaughter, Rachel Jordana Lewis, who is about to leave home to begin college as this paper is completed.Disclosure statementThis article is a revised version of my chapter “Animals, Music, and Psychoanalysis” in The Cultural Zoo (S. Akhtar and V. Volkan, Eds.), 2005, International University Press (no longer publishing), and in the revised chapter, “Self Esteem – Peter and the Wolf” which was published in my book Melodies of the Mind, 2013, Routledge.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJulie Jaffee NagelJulie Jaffee Nagel, Ph.D., is a graduate of The Juilliard School, The University of Michigan, and The Michigan Psychoanalytic Institute. She is the author of Melodies of the Mind (Routledge Press), Managing Stage Fright: A Guide for Musicians and Music Teachers (Oxford University Press), and the just published Career Choices in Music Beyond the Pandemic: Musical and Psychological Perspectives (Rowman and Littlefield) as well as publications in major psychoanalytic journals. She has presented her work nationally and internationally. Dr. Nagel has a private practice in psychotherapy and psychoanalysis in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
本文将探讨我将音乐概念化的一些方式,因为它与“家”的概念有关,特别是在这里,关于离开家。我将利用作曲家谢尔盖·普罗科菲耶夫著名的作品《彼得与狼》中的音乐,说明彼得在离开童年花园之家时逐渐融入和巩固自己的身份。因此,对音乐本身的分析作为精神分析数据的主要来源是我在跨学科探索中所采用的独特分析方法。普罗科菲耶夫的代表作《彼得与狼》涉及以下主题:音乐和精神分析的概念具有持久的价值,因为它们相互通知并丰富了对方。音乐是进入情感和无意识过程的重要入口。音乐和精神分析的原则在音乐厅和咨询室内外都是相关的,有助于对我们内心生活的细微理解。本文献给我的大孙女莎拉·埃丝特·刘易斯,在我写这篇文章的时候,她刚刚离开家,成为一名大学新生;同时献给我们最小的孙女雷切尔·乔达娜·刘易斯,在本文完成的时候,她也即将离开家,开始上大学。披露声明:本文是我在《文化动物园》(S. Akhtar and V. Volkan,编辑)2005年国际大学出版社(不再出版)中“动物、音乐和精神分析”章节的修订版,以及我在《心灵的旋律》(2013年,Routledge)一书中出版的“自尊-彼得和狼”章节的修订版。作者简介:julie Jaffee Nagel博士毕业于茱莉亚音乐学院、密歇根大学和密歇根精神分析研究所。她是《心灵的旋律》(劳特利奇出版社)的作者,《管理怯场:音乐家和音乐教师指南》(牛津大学出版社),以及刚刚出版的《超越流行病的音乐职业选择:音乐和心理视角》(罗曼和利特菲尔德)以及主要精神分析期刊的出版物。她在国内和国际上展示了她的作品。内格尔博士在密歇根州安娜堡市从事心理治疗和精神分析方面的私人执业。
{"title":"Leaving Home: Prokofiev’s “Peter and the Wolf”","authors":"Julie Jaffee Nagel","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235259","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article will explore some of the ways I conceptualize music as it pertains to the concept of “home,” and specifically here, about leaving home. Using composer Sergei Prokofiev’s music in his well-known beloved composition, Peter and the Wolf, I will illustrate the gradual integration and consolidation of identity in the eponymous character, Peter, as he left his childhood garden home. Thus, the analysis of music itself as a primary source of psychoanalytic data is the distinctive method of analysis that I bring to my interdisciplinary explorations. Prokofiev’s masterpiece Peter and the Wolf pertains to the following overdetermined themes: Music and psychoanalytic concepts hold enduring value as each informs and enriches the other. Music serves as an important entry into affect and unconscious processes. Music and psychoanalytic principles are relevant both inside and beyond the concert hall and consulting room and contribute to a nuanced understanding of our inner lives.KEYWORDS: Psychological developmentErik Eriksonindividuationmusical themesaffectsinstrumentationorchestrationProkofievPeter and the Wolf AcknowledgmentsThis paper is dedicated both to my oldest granddaughter, Sarah Esther Lewis, who just left home to become a college freshman as I was writing this article, and to our youngest granddaughter, Rachel Jordana Lewis, who is about to leave home to begin college as this paper is completed.Disclosure statementThis article is a revised version of my chapter “Animals, Music, and Psychoanalysis” in The Cultural Zoo (S. Akhtar and V. Volkan, Eds.), 2005, International University Press (no longer publishing), and in the revised chapter, “Self Esteem – Peter and the Wolf” which was published in my book Melodies of the Mind, 2013, Routledge.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJulie Jaffee NagelJulie Jaffee Nagel, Ph.D., is a graduate of The Juilliard School, The University of Michigan, and The Michigan Psychoanalytic Institute. She is the author of Melodies of the Mind (Routledge Press), Managing Stage Fright: A Guide for Musicians and Music Teachers (Oxford University Press), and the just published Career Choices in Music Beyond the Pandemic: Musical and Psychological Perspectives (Rowman and Littlefield) as well as publications in major psychoanalytic journals. She has presented her work nationally and internationally. Dr. Nagel has a private practice in psychotherapy and psychoanalysis in Ann Arbor, Michigan.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2236506
Yamini Nayar
ABSTRACTWhat does it mean to inhabit? Our many selves find dimensionality through time and in place. This is complicated through the event of mass migration and trauma. One is continuously mapped through a locating of interiority. Within this essay, Nayar traces the birth and evolution of place as interior, and the genesis of her hybrid, constructed photographic process. Through the lens of India’s 1947 Partition, a trajectory of trauma and the ways in which memory functions over time is traced and translated through a family’s resettlement home in New Delhi. Built by her maternal grandfather, a refugee and psychiatrist from East Bengal, this locus in Nayar’s memory sheds light on how one may understand the many intersections of belonging and place. Home is found in habitation, that of desire and the awakening of the Mother. In this way, attachment theory, Winnicott’s transitional object, and the uncanny are touchstones for an internal mapping of psychic space. Through this framework, one understands what it means to embody through time and what is, through the process, left behind.KEYWORDS: Mappingspacememoryhomephotographytransitional objectmothermigrationcamera obscurainhabitlandscapearchitectureNew DelhitimePartitionIndia Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography (Hill and Wang, 2010), pp. 39–40.2 The Partition of India refers to a historical event in 1947 when the British colony formally dissolved and resulted in the creation of two independent dominions, India and Pakistan. Created along religious Hindi-Muslim lines, the event resulted in large-scale violence, mass deaths and a refugee crisis.3 Photo paper is different from plain paper in that it has a cast coating layer that can receive and imprint an image.4 Camera Lucida, p. 40.5 East Bengal, with its majority Muslim population, became part of the Pakistani state and its name was changed to East Pakistan as a result of Partition. In 1971, after a series of uprisings by Bengali nationalists, East Pakistan became an independent country, Bangladesh, which it is still today.Additional informationNotes on contributorsYamini NayarYamini Nayar lives and works in Brooklyn, New York. She is currently an analyst-in-training at the C.G. Jung Institute, New York. Nayar’s work is represented by Jhaveri Contemporary, Mumbai, Gallery Wendi Norris, San Francisco and Thomas Erben, New York.Nayar has shown her work internationally at venues including the Museum of Moderne Kunst Frankfurt, Freud Museum London, Rencontres d’Arles, Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, Queensland Art Gallery in Australia, DeCordova Museum MA, Kiran Nadar Museum New Delhi, Sharjah Biennial in UAE, Saatchi Gallery UK, and Serendipity Arts Festival, Goa, India. Public collections include Solomon Guggenheim Museum NY, Kiran Nadar Museum, Saatchi Museum, Queensland Art Gallery, Cincinnati Art Museum, Hiscox and US Arts in Embassies,
栖息是什么意思?我们的许多自我通过时间和地点找到维度。由于大规模移民和创伤事件,这一问题变得更加复杂。一个是通过内部定位连续映射的。在这篇文章中,Nayar追溯了作为内部的地方的诞生和演变,以及她混合的、建构的摄影过程的起源。通过1947年印度分治的镜头,通过一个家庭在新德里的重新安置,追溯了创伤的轨迹和记忆随着时间的流逝而发挥作用的方式。纳亚尔的外祖父是一名来自东孟加拉的难民和精神病学家,她的外祖父建造了这座建筑,这座位于纳亚尔记忆中的建筑向我们展示了一个人如何理解归属感和地方的许多交叉点。家是在居住中找到的,那是欲望和母亲的觉醒。通过这种方式,依恋理论、温尼科特的过渡对象和神秘是心理空间内部映射的试金石。通过这个框架,人们理解了通过时间的体现意味着什么,以及通过这个过程,留下了什么。关键词:测绘、空间、记忆、家庭摄影、过渡对象、母亲、迁徙、相机、隐蔽、习惯、景观建筑、新德里、分区、印度注1 Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography (Hill and Wang, 2010), pp. 39-40.2印度的分裂是指1947年的一个历史事件,当时英国殖民地正式解散,导致印度和巴基斯坦两个独立的领土的创建。这一事件是根据印度教和穆斯林的宗教界线而产生的,导致了大规模的暴力、大规模的死亡和难民危机相纸与普通纸的不同之处在于它有一层可以接收和印印图像的铸造涂层以穆斯林人口为主的东孟加拉成为巴基斯坦的一部分,由于分治,它的名字改为东巴基斯坦。1971年,在孟加拉民族主义者的一系列起义之后,东巴基斯坦成为一个独立的国家,孟加拉国,直到今天。亚米尼·纳亚尔亚米尼·纳亚尔在纽约布鲁克林生活和工作。她目前是纽约荣格研究所(C.G. Jung Institute)的培训分析师。纳亚尔的作品在孟买Jhaveri Contemporary、旧金山Wendi Norris画廊和纽约Thomas Erben画廊展出。纳亚尔的作品曾在法兰克福现代艺术博物馆、伦敦弗洛伊德博物馆、阿尔勒当代艺术博览会、芳草艺术中心、澳大利亚昆士兰美术馆、马萨诸塞州DeCordova博物馆、新德里Kiran Nadar博物馆、阿联酋沙迦双年展、英国萨奇画廊和印度果阿的Serendipity艺术节等国际展览场所展出。公共藏品包括纽约所罗门古根海姆博物馆、基兰纳达尔博物馆、萨奇博物馆、昆士兰美术馆、辛辛那提艺术博物馆、希斯科克斯和美国大使馆艺术、摩根大通。出版物包括:20世纪印度艺术,现代,后独立,当代,编辑Partha Mitter, Parul Dave Mukherji, Rakhee Balaram (Thames and Hudson, 2022);《全球摄影:一段批判的历史》,编辑Heather Diack、Erina Duganne、Terri Weissman (Routledge出版社,2020年);《昌迪加尔在印度》,沙内·贾维尼编辑(Shoestring出版社,2016年);《段落:今日印度艺术》(Daab Media, 2014);控制线,作为生产空间的分区(绿色豆蔻,2012);不固定:当代艺术中的后殖民摄影(日本山姆图书,2013);《帝国反击战:当代印度艺术》(萨奇)和《叛逆手册:沙迦双年展》,穆尔塔扎·瓦利编辑(2011)。纳亚尔的作品曾被《纽约时报》、《纽约客》、《印度艺术》、《艺术论坛》、《美国艺术》、《弗里兹美术展》、《艺术论文》等媒体报道。驻留和资助项目包括曼哈顿下城文化委员会工作空间、伍德斯托克摄影中心、辛辛那提艺术学院和纽约大学访问艺术家学者。Nayar曾获得Lightborne Fellowship, Aaron Siskind奖学金和艺术事务基金会的资助。纳亚尔拥有纽约视觉艺术学院的艺术硕士学位和罗德岛设计学院的艺术学士学位。Nayar的作品与摄影,雕塑和各种形式的建筑相交叉,询问我们与建筑世界的关系,从而询问我们自己。在她以工作室为基础的实践中,照片是制作、建造、解构和形成通往建筑环境的新道路的投资过程的剩余对象。通过这种方式,我们如何记忆是核心,与我们如何创造意义密切相关。
{"title":"Mapping Obscura: Locating the Space and Non-Space of Memory and Home through the Photograph","authors":"Yamini Nayar","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2236506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2236506","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWhat does it mean to inhabit? Our many selves find dimensionality through time and in place. This is complicated through the event of mass migration and trauma. One is continuously mapped through a locating of interiority. Within this essay, Nayar traces the birth and evolution of place as interior, and the genesis of her hybrid, constructed photographic process. Through the lens of India’s 1947 Partition, a trajectory of trauma and the ways in which memory functions over time is traced and translated through a family’s resettlement home in New Delhi. Built by her maternal grandfather, a refugee and psychiatrist from East Bengal, this locus in Nayar’s memory sheds light on how one may understand the many intersections of belonging and place. Home is found in habitation, that of desire and the awakening of the Mother. In this way, attachment theory, Winnicott’s transitional object, and the uncanny are touchstones for an internal mapping of psychic space. Through this framework, one understands what it means to embody through time and what is, through the process, left behind.KEYWORDS: Mappingspacememoryhomephotographytransitional objectmothermigrationcamera obscurainhabitlandscapearchitectureNew DelhitimePartitionIndia Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography (Hill and Wang, 2010), pp. 39–40.2 The Partition of India refers to a historical event in 1947 when the British colony formally dissolved and resulted in the creation of two independent dominions, India and Pakistan. Created along religious Hindi-Muslim lines, the event resulted in large-scale violence, mass deaths and a refugee crisis.3 Photo paper is different from plain paper in that it has a cast coating layer that can receive and imprint an image.4 Camera Lucida, p. 40.5 East Bengal, with its majority Muslim population, became part of the Pakistani state and its name was changed to East Pakistan as a result of Partition. In 1971, after a series of uprisings by Bengali nationalists, East Pakistan became an independent country, Bangladesh, which it is still today.Additional informationNotes on contributorsYamini NayarYamini Nayar lives and works in Brooklyn, New York. She is currently an analyst-in-training at the C.G. Jung Institute, New York. Nayar’s work is represented by Jhaveri Contemporary, Mumbai, Gallery Wendi Norris, San Francisco and Thomas Erben, New York.Nayar has shown her work internationally at venues including the Museum of Moderne Kunst Frankfurt, Freud Museum London, Rencontres d’Arles, Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, Queensland Art Gallery in Australia, DeCordova Museum MA, Kiran Nadar Museum New Delhi, Sharjah Biennial in UAE, Saatchi Gallery UK, and Serendipity Arts Festival, Goa, India. Public collections include Solomon Guggenheim Museum NY, Kiran Nadar Museum, Saatchi Museum, Queensland Art Gallery, Cincinnati Art Museum, Hiscox and US Arts in Embassies,","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}