Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235257
Ellen Handler Spitz
ABSTRACTBy highlighting two classic children’s books in which the setting of New York City plays a starring role, Tell Me a Mitzi and Little Boy Brown, this essay explores ways in which childhood reading expands a young person’s nascent and burgeoning sense of self in part by elaborating the notion of home. Books such as those described here stand to enable young children to develop flexible ideas about the nature of home and to imagine what it feels like to live elsewhere and differently.KEYWORDS: Children’s bookssense of selfhomesecrets Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 See “Children’s Rooms, Sites of Refuge, and Being Lost” in Ellen Handler Spitz, The Brightening Glance: Imagination and Childhood, 2006, pp. 132–141.2 See “Art without History” in Ellen Handler Spitz, Image and Insight: Essays in Psychoanalysis and the Arts, 1991. New York: Columbia University Press.3 See Jerome Bruner, The Process of Education, 1960 (Harvard University Press) and Thomas Balmès, Bébés (documentary film, 2010).4 Gaston Bachelard, The Poetics of Space, 1964. Translated from the French by Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.5 In A Velocity of Being: Letters to a Young Reader, 2018, eds., Maria Popova and Claudia Zoe Bedrick, see pp. 190–191.6 Maurice Sendak, Where the Wild Things Are, 1963. New York: Harper and Row.7 Judith Viorst, Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day, 1972. New York: Simon and Schuster.8 Lore Segal, Tell Me a Mitzi, 1970. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. See also my “Mitzi is Back. Tell Me a Lore.” Fuse#8, ed., Elizabeth Bird, March 9, 2018 (online), on which I draw in the current essay.9 Lore Segal, Other People’s Houses, 1964. New York: The New Press.10 See D.W. Winnicott, “The Use of an Object” in The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1969, No. 50, pp. 711–716.11 See Selma H. Fraiberg’s eternally brilliant The Magic Years, 1959. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.12 See Fraiberg again, as in supra, note #x.13 Ernst Gombrich, Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art, 1963.14 Isobel Harris, Little Boy Brown, 2013. New York: Enchanted Lion Books. Originally published in 1949, Philadelphia: Lippincott.15 My host was the University of the South; the convener was Dr. Linda Mayes of the Child Study Center, Yale University, who originated an ongoing interdisciplinary program to study life in rural Appalachia.16 See my Inside Picture Books, 1999, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Additional informationNotes on contributorsEllen Handler SpitzEllen Handler Spitz, Ph.D., is Senior Lecturer in Humanities at Yale University, Fellow of the New York Institute for the Humanities, and Member of the Council of Scholars at the Erikson Institute of the Austen Riggs Center. She is the author of seven books: Art and Psyche, Image and Insight, Museums of the Mind, Inside Picture Books, The Brightening Glance, Illuminating Childhood, and Magritte’s L
摘要本文以以纽约为主要背景的两本经典儿童读物《告诉我一个米兹》和《小男孩布朗》为例,探讨童年阅读如何通过阐述家的概念来扩展年轻人初生和迅速发展的自我意识。像这里所描述的这些书可以使年幼的孩子们对家的本质有灵活的认识,并想象住在其他地方和不同的地方是什么感觉。关键词:童书自我意识秘密披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。注1见艾伦·汉德勒·斯皮茨《明亮的一瞥:想象与童年》,2006年,第132 - 142页。见艾伦·汉德勒·斯皮茨《形象与洞察力:精神分析与艺术论文集》,1991年,“没有历史的艺术”。3参见Jerome Bruner, The Process of Education, 1960(哈佛大学出版社)和Thomas balm, bsm - bsm(纪录片,2010)加斯顿·巴舍拉,《空间诗学》,1964年。由Maria Jolas翻译自法语。波士顿:灯塔出版社。5在存在的速度:给年轻读者的信,2018年,编辑。,玛丽亚·波波娃和克劳迪娅·佐伊·贝德里克,见第190-191.6页。莫里斯·桑达克:《野兽出没的地方》,1963年版。朱迪思·维奥斯特,《亚历山大和可怕的、可怕的、不好的、非常糟糕的一天》,1972年出版。纽约:西蒙和舒斯特出版社。8洛·西格尔,《告诉我一件事》,1970年。纽约:Farrar, Straus and Giroux。参见我的“米兹回来了”。告诉我一个爱。”引信#8,编辑,伊丽莎白·伯德,2018年3月9日(在线),我在当前的文章中借鉴了这一点洛·西格尔,《别人的房子》,1964年。见d·w·温尼科特,《对象的使用》,载于《国际精神分析杂志》1969年第50期,第711-716.11页。见塞尔玛·h·弗莱伯格的《神奇岁月》,1959年。纽约:查尔斯·斯克里布纳的儿子们。12再次参见弗莱伯格,见上文注释#x.13恩斯特·贡布里希:《一匹爱好马的沉思和其他关于艺术理论的论文》,1963年。伊莎贝尔·哈里斯:《小男孩布朗》,2013年。纽约:魔法狮子图书公司。最初出版于1949年,费城:利平科特。15我的东道主是南方大学;召集人是耶鲁大学儿童研究中心的琳达·梅耶斯博士,她发起了一个正在进行的跨学科项目,研究阿巴拉契亚农村的生活。16参见我的内部图画书,1999年,纽黑文和伦敦:耶鲁大学出版社。作者简介:ellen Handler Spitz,博士,耶鲁大学人文学科高级讲师,纽约人文学院研究员,奥斯汀·里格斯中心埃里克森学院学者委员会成员。她是七本书的作者:艺术与心灵,图像与洞察力,心灵博物馆,内部图画书,明亮的一瞥,照亮童年和马格利特的迷宫,并在《纽约时报书评》,《新共和》,《洛杉矶书评》和《儿童精神分析研究》等杂志上发表过文章。
{"title":"On Children’s Books, Home, and the Beginnings of Self: <i>Tell Me a Mitzi</i> and <i>Little Boy Brown</i>","authors":"Ellen Handler Spitz","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235257","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBy highlighting two classic children’s books in which the setting of New York City plays a starring role, Tell Me a Mitzi and Little Boy Brown, this essay explores ways in which childhood reading expands a young person’s nascent and burgeoning sense of self in part by elaborating the notion of home. Books such as those described here stand to enable young children to develop flexible ideas about the nature of home and to imagine what it feels like to live elsewhere and differently.KEYWORDS: Children’s bookssense of selfhomesecrets Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 See “Children’s Rooms, Sites of Refuge, and Being Lost” in Ellen Handler Spitz, The Brightening Glance: Imagination and Childhood, 2006, pp. 132–141.2 See “Art without History” in Ellen Handler Spitz, Image and Insight: Essays in Psychoanalysis and the Arts, 1991. New York: Columbia University Press.3 See Jerome Bruner, The Process of Education, 1960 (Harvard University Press) and Thomas Balmès, Bébés (documentary film, 2010).4 Gaston Bachelard, The Poetics of Space, 1964. Translated from the French by Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.5 In A Velocity of Being: Letters to a Young Reader, 2018, eds., Maria Popova and Claudia Zoe Bedrick, see pp. 190–191.6 Maurice Sendak, Where the Wild Things Are, 1963. New York: Harper and Row.7 Judith Viorst, Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day, 1972. New York: Simon and Schuster.8 Lore Segal, Tell Me a Mitzi, 1970. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. See also my “Mitzi is Back. Tell Me a Lore.” Fuse#8, ed., Elizabeth Bird, March 9, 2018 (online), on which I draw in the current essay.9 Lore Segal, Other People’s Houses, 1964. New York: The New Press.10 See D.W. Winnicott, “The Use of an Object” in The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1969, No. 50, pp. 711–716.11 See Selma H. Fraiberg’s eternally brilliant The Magic Years, 1959. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.12 See Fraiberg again, as in supra, note #x.13 Ernst Gombrich, Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art, 1963.14 Isobel Harris, Little Boy Brown, 2013. New York: Enchanted Lion Books. Originally published in 1949, Philadelphia: Lippincott.15 My host was the University of the South; the convener was Dr. Linda Mayes of the Child Study Center, Yale University, who originated an ongoing interdisciplinary program to study life in rural Appalachia.16 See my Inside Picture Books, 1999, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Additional informationNotes on contributorsEllen Handler SpitzEllen Handler Spitz, Ph.D., is Senior Lecturer in Humanities at Yale University, Fellow of the New York Institute for the Humanities, and Member of the Council of Scholars at the Erikson Institute of the Austen Riggs Center. She is the author of seven books: Art and Psyche, Image and Insight, Museums of the Mind, Inside Picture Books, The Brightening Glance, Illuminating Childhood, and Magritte’s L","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235237
Carol Seigel
ABSTRACTSigmund Freud’s escape from Austria at the end of his life, and his experiences during his last year in London, are explored. The two homes where Freud lived in London and Vienna are compared, and their unique characteristics examined. During Freud’s final year at home in London he was busy and active, writing, seeing patients, receiving visitors, surrounded by family and friends, until his cancer was no longer treatable. Freud died at home in September 1939. Freud’s legacy is preserved today in museums in both his homes, Berggasse 19 and 20 Maresfield Gardens.KEYWORDS: Sigmund FreudAnna FreudMartha FreudAthenaBerggasseMaresfield GardensViennaLondondeath Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Freud-Ernst Freud 12.5.1938, FML, quoted in ed. Ernst Freud, Letters of Sigmund Freud 1873–1939, 1957, p. 438.2 Freud- Lampl-de-Groot, 22.8.1938, FML.3 August Aichhorn, quoted in interview with Edmund Engelman, The Independent newspaper, 31.7.1999.4 Freud-Sam Freud 4.6.1938, Freud Museum London (FML).5 Freud-Eitingon, 7.6.1938, FML.6 Hilda Doolittle (HD), Tribute to Freud, 1956.7 Freud- Marie Bonaparte, 8.6.1938, FML.8 Freud-Silberstein, 1875, Sigmund Freud Archive, Library of Congress.9 Freud-Lampl-de-Groot, 13.6.1938, FML.10 Freud – Alexander Freud, 22.6.1938, Sigmund Freud Archive, Library of Congress.11 Freud-H.G.Wells, 16.7.1939, FML.12 Ivan Ward, Freud’s English Home, Education Blog, 14.4.2020, www.freud.org.uk.13 FML Archive material.14 Gay, Peter Freud: A Life for Our Time, 1971 p. 635.15 Freud -Lampl-de-Groot, 8.10.1938, FML.16 Freud -Lampl-de-Groot, 13.6.1938, FML.17 Freud-Eitingon, 19.12.1938, FML.18 Martha Freud-Lilly Freud Marte, 22.6.1938, LOC.19 Freud-Lampl-de-Groot, 20.11.1938, FML, quoted in Michael Molnar, The Diary of Sigmund Freud 1929–39, 1992.20 Kurzeste Chronik, 10.11.1938, quoted in Michael Molnar, The Diary of Sigmund Freud 1929–39, 1992.21 Anna Freud-Clinton McCord, 28.8.1938, FML.22 Preface, 20 Maresfield Gardens, A Guide to the Freud Museum, 1998.23 Victor Mazin, Art Dreams and Revolution, chapter in ed. Monika Pessler & Daniela Finzi, Freud, Berggasse 19, The Origin of Psychoanalysis, 2020.24 Victor Mazin, Art Dreams and Revolution, chapter in ed. Monika Pessler & Daniela Finzi, Freud, Berggasse 19, The Origin of Psychoanalysis, 2020.25 Tom Derose, “Home is Where the Heart is”, Education Blog 7.4.2020, www.freud.org.uk.26 Letter Freud-Fliess, quoted in Burke, Janine, The Gods of Freud, 2006, p. 139.27 “My Recollections of Sigmund Freud”, in The Wolf-Man by the Wolf-Man, ed. Muriel Gardiner (1971), quoted in Freud: A Life for Our Time by Peter Gay, P. 170.28 Hilda Doolittle (HD), Tribute to Freud, 1956.29 Kurzeste Chronik, 8.8.1938, quoted in Michael Molnar, The Diary of Sigmund Freud 1929–39, 1992.30 Hilda Doolittle (HD), Tribute to Freud, 1956.31 Jones, Ernest, Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, 1953.32 Freud-Eitingon, 8.10.1938, FML, quoted in 20 Maresfield Gardens: A Guide
{"title":"Sigmund Freud’s Final Home","authors":"Carol Seigel","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235237","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSigmund Freud’s escape from Austria at the end of his life, and his experiences during his last year in London, are explored. The two homes where Freud lived in London and Vienna are compared, and their unique characteristics examined. During Freud’s final year at home in London he was busy and active, writing, seeing patients, receiving visitors, surrounded by family and friends, until his cancer was no longer treatable. Freud died at home in September 1939. Freud’s legacy is preserved today in museums in both his homes, Berggasse 19 and 20 Maresfield Gardens.KEYWORDS: Sigmund FreudAnna FreudMartha FreudAthenaBerggasseMaresfield GardensViennaLondondeath Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Freud-Ernst Freud 12.5.1938, FML, quoted in ed. Ernst Freud, Letters of Sigmund Freud 1873–1939, 1957, p. 438.2 Freud- Lampl-de-Groot, 22.8.1938, FML.3 August Aichhorn, quoted in interview with Edmund Engelman, The Independent newspaper, 31.7.1999.4 Freud-Sam Freud 4.6.1938, Freud Museum London (FML).5 Freud-Eitingon, 7.6.1938, FML.6 Hilda Doolittle (HD), Tribute to Freud, 1956.7 Freud- Marie Bonaparte, 8.6.1938, FML.8 Freud-Silberstein, 1875, Sigmund Freud Archive, Library of Congress.9 Freud-Lampl-de-Groot, 13.6.1938, FML.10 Freud – Alexander Freud, 22.6.1938, Sigmund Freud Archive, Library of Congress.11 Freud-H.G.Wells, 16.7.1939, FML.12 Ivan Ward, Freud’s English Home, Education Blog, 14.4.2020, www.freud.org.uk.13 FML Archive material.14 Gay, Peter Freud: A Life for Our Time, 1971 p. 635.15 Freud -Lampl-de-Groot, 8.10.1938, FML.16 Freud -Lampl-de-Groot, 13.6.1938, FML.17 Freud-Eitingon, 19.12.1938, FML.18 Martha Freud-Lilly Freud Marte, 22.6.1938, LOC.19 Freud-Lampl-de-Groot, 20.11.1938, FML, quoted in Michael Molnar, The Diary of Sigmund Freud 1929–39, 1992.20 Kurzeste Chronik, 10.11.1938, quoted in Michael Molnar, The Diary of Sigmund Freud 1929–39, 1992.21 Anna Freud-Clinton McCord, 28.8.1938, FML.22 Preface, 20 Maresfield Gardens, A Guide to the Freud Museum, 1998.23 Victor Mazin, Art Dreams and Revolution, chapter in ed. Monika Pessler & Daniela Finzi, Freud, Berggasse 19, The Origin of Psychoanalysis, 2020.24 Victor Mazin, Art Dreams and Revolution, chapter in ed. Monika Pessler & Daniela Finzi, Freud, Berggasse 19, The Origin of Psychoanalysis, 2020.25 Tom Derose, “Home is Where the Heart is”, Education Blog 7.4.2020, www.freud.org.uk.26 Letter Freud-Fliess, quoted in Burke, Janine, The Gods of Freud, 2006, p. 139.27 “My Recollections of Sigmund Freud”, in The Wolf-Man by the Wolf-Man, ed. Muriel Gardiner (1971), quoted in Freud: A Life for Our Time by Peter Gay, P. 170.28 Hilda Doolittle (HD), Tribute to Freud, 1956.29 Kurzeste Chronik, 8.8.1938, quoted in Michael Molnar, The Diary of Sigmund Freud 1929–39, 1992.30 Hilda Doolittle (HD), Tribute to Freud, 1956.31 Jones, Ernest, Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, 1953.32 Freud-Eitingon, 8.10.1938, FML, quoted in 20 Maresfield Gardens: A Guide ","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235274
Anne J. Adelman
ABSTRACTThe author, having grown up in the shadow of the Holocaust, formed a sense of home around the idea that the past was a broken and vanished continent. In this article, the author explores the challenges of leaving home, the trauma of losing home, and the reparation of finding home across the intergenerational trauma and loss.KEYWORDS: HomeHolocausttraumaparentinglossmourningseparationintergenerational repair Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 When The Garden Isn’t Eden: More Psychoanalytic Stories from Life, with Kerry Malawista and Linda Kanefield (Columbia University Press, 2022).Psychoanalytic Reflections on Parenting Teens and Young Adults: Changing Patterns of Modern Love, Loss and Longing (Routledge, 2018).The Therapist in Mourning: From the Faraway Nearby, with Kerry Malawista (Columbia University Press, 2013).Wearing my Tutu to Analysis and Other Stories, with Kerry Malawista and Catherine Anderson (Columbia University Press, 2011).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAnne J. AdelmanAnne J. Adelman, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist and Supervising and Training analyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis, and a recipient of that institute’s award for excellence in teaching in 2019. She is also a Teaching Analyst at the Contemporary Freudian Society. She has published several articles and is the coauthor and editor of four books.Footnote11 When The Garden Isn’t Eden: More Psychoanalytic Stories from Life, with Kerry Malawista and Linda Kanefield (Columbia University Press, 2022).Psychoanalytic Reflections on Parenting Teens and Young Adults: Changing Patterns of Modern Love, Loss and Longing (Routledge, 2018).The Therapist in Mourning: From the Faraway Nearby, with Kerry Malawista (Columbia University Press, 2013).Wearing my Tutu to Analysis and Other Stories, with Kerry Malawista and Catherine Anderson (Columbia University Press, 2011). As Co-Editor of JAPA Review of Books, she launched a feature column called “Why I Write,” inviting analysts to reflect on the experience of writing. She is a cochair of the New Directions in Writing Program and maintains a private practice in Chevy Chase, Maryland.
【摘要】作者在大屠杀的阴影下长大,围绕着过去是一个破碎和消失的大陆的观念形成了一种家的感觉。在这篇文章中,作者探讨了离开家的挑战,失去家的创伤,以及跨越代际创伤和损失的寻找家的补偿。关键词:家庭大屠杀、创伤、父母抚养、损失、悲伤、分离、代际修复披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1《当花园不再是伊甸园:更多来自生活的精神分析故事》,克里·马拉维斯塔和琳达·卡内菲尔德著(哥伦比亚大学出版社,2022年)。对养育青少年和年轻人的精神分析思考:现代爱、失去和渴望的变化模式(Routledge, 2018)。《哀悼中的治疗师:来自遥远的附近》,克里·马拉维斯塔著(哥伦比亚大学出版社,2013年)。穿着我的图图去分析和其他故事,与克里马拉维斯塔和凯瑟琳安德森(哥伦比亚大学出版社,2011)。安妮·j·阿德尔曼博士是华盛顿巴尔的摩精神分析中心的临床心理学家、监督和培训分析师,也是该研究所2019年卓越教学奖的获得者。她也是当代弗洛伊德学会的教学分析师。她发表了几篇文章,是四本书的合著者和编辑。脚注11:《当花园不是伊甸园:更多来自生活的精神分析故事》,克里·马拉维斯塔和琳达·卡内菲尔德著(哥伦比亚大学出版社,2022年)。对养育青少年和年轻人的精神分析思考:现代爱、失去和渴望的变化模式(Routledge, 2018)。《哀悼中的治疗师:来自遥远的附近》,克里·马拉维斯塔著(哥伦比亚大学出版社,2013年)。穿着我的图图去分析和其他故事,与克里马拉维斯塔和凯瑟琳安德森(哥伦比亚大学出版社,2011)。作为《JAPA书评》(JAPA Review of Books)的联合编辑,她开设了一个名为“我为什么写作”的专题专栏,邀请分析人士反思写作的经历。她是写作新方向项目的联合主席,并在马里兰州的切维蔡斯拥有一家私人诊所。
{"title":"Leaving, Losing and Finding Home: Through the Shadow of Trauma","authors":"Anne J. Adelman","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235274","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe author, having grown up in the shadow of the Holocaust, formed a sense of home around the idea that the past was a broken and vanished continent. In this article, the author explores the challenges of leaving home, the trauma of losing home, and the reparation of finding home across the intergenerational trauma and loss.KEYWORDS: HomeHolocausttraumaparentinglossmourningseparationintergenerational repair Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 When The Garden Isn’t Eden: More Psychoanalytic Stories from Life, with Kerry Malawista and Linda Kanefield (Columbia University Press, 2022).Psychoanalytic Reflections on Parenting Teens and Young Adults: Changing Patterns of Modern Love, Loss and Longing (Routledge, 2018).The Therapist in Mourning: From the Faraway Nearby, with Kerry Malawista (Columbia University Press, 2013).Wearing my Tutu to Analysis and Other Stories, with Kerry Malawista and Catherine Anderson (Columbia University Press, 2011).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAnne J. AdelmanAnne J. Adelman, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist and Supervising and Training analyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis, and a recipient of that institute’s award for excellence in teaching in 2019. She is also a Teaching Analyst at the Contemporary Freudian Society. She has published several articles and is the coauthor and editor of four books.Footnote11 When The Garden Isn’t Eden: More Psychoanalytic Stories from Life, with Kerry Malawista and Linda Kanefield (Columbia University Press, 2022).Psychoanalytic Reflections on Parenting Teens and Young Adults: Changing Patterns of Modern Love, Loss and Longing (Routledge, 2018).The Therapist in Mourning: From the Faraway Nearby, with Kerry Malawista (Columbia University Press, 2013).Wearing my Tutu to Analysis and Other Stories, with Kerry Malawista and Catherine Anderson (Columbia University Press, 2011). As Co-Editor of JAPA Review of Books, she launched a feature column called “Why I Write,” inviting analysts to reflect on the experience of writing. She is a cochair of the New Directions in Writing Program and maintains a private practice in Chevy Chase, Maryland.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235260
Alexandra Viets
ABSTRACTIn language studies, mother tongue is linked to culture—its literature, artifacts, wisdom, generational ties, its jokes and proverbs, the names of flowers. A mother tongue carries the archive of one’s own history—a sense of belonging at the heart of identity, one’s central core. Language is among the first bonds between mother and child, words forging intimacy and communication. Yet, what happens when a mother tongue is associated with war and trauma? When language conveys displacement or the reenactment of a too-painful past? This essay explores the impact of growing up with a mother who suppressed her mother tongue and a daughter’s search for the language of home that followed.KEYWORDS: Languagewarwomendislocationmotherhome Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAlexandra VietsAlexandra Viets is a writer/screenwriter and journalist whose work focuses on women and dislocation. Her first feature-length screenplay, Cotton Mary, won a New York Foundation for the Arts award and was produced by Merchant Ivory. Her film/theater reviews and essays have appeared in publications such as The International Herald Tribune/NYT, The Far Eastern Economic Review and the Asia Wall Street Journal. Viets has taught in the MFA programs at Towson University’s Department of Theater Arts and at The American University in Washington, DC, specializing in literature and film. She currently teaches in the MA in Writing Program at Johns Hopkins University. Excerpts from her memoir entitled, Maryna, After the War, have been published in Thin Air, Nowhere Magazine and shortlisted for Wasafiri’s New Writing Prize in London. Viets received her B.A. from Oberlin College in political science and an MFA from Columbia University.
在语言研究中,母语是与文化联系在一起的——它的文学、人工制品、智慧、代际关系、笑话和谚语、花名。母语承载着一个人自己的历史档案——一种身份核心的归属感,一个人的核心。语言是母亲和孩子之间最早的纽带之一,是建立亲密关系和交流的语言。然而,当母语与战争和创伤联系在一起时会发生什么呢?当语言传达位移或重演一个太痛苦的过去?这篇文章探讨了在一个压抑母语的母亲和女儿随后寻找家乡语言的环境中成长的影响。关键词:语言、战争、女性错位、母亲家园披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:salexandra viet是一名作家、编剧和记者,她的工作重点是女性和错位。她的第一部长篇剧本《棉花玛丽》(Cotton Mary)获得了纽约艺术基金会奖,由Merchant Ivory制作。她的电影/戏剧评论和文章发表在《国际先驱论坛报》/《纽约时报》、《远东经济评论》和《亚洲华尔街日报》等出版物上。他曾在陶森大学戏剧艺术系和华盛顿特区的美利坚大学教授文学和电影艺术硕士课程。她目前在约翰霍普金斯大学教授写作硕士课程。她的回忆录《战后玛丽娜》(Maryna, After the War)的节选发表在《稀薄的空气》和《无处可去》杂志上,并入围了伦敦Wasafiri新写作奖。她在奥伯林学院获得政治学学士学位,在哥伦比亚大学获得硕士学位。
{"title":"Mother Tongue","authors":"Alexandra Viets","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235260","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn language studies, mother tongue is linked to culture—its literature, artifacts, wisdom, generational ties, its jokes and proverbs, the names of flowers. A mother tongue carries the archive of one’s own history—a sense of belonging at the heart of identity, one’s central core. Language is among the first bonds between mother and child, words forging intimacy and communication. Yet, what happens when a mother tongue is associated with war and trauma? When language conveys displacement or the reenactment of a too-painful past? This essay explores the impact of growing up with a mother who suppressed her mother tongue and a daughter’s search for the language of home that followed.KEYWORDS: Languagewarwomendislocationmotherhome Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAlexandra VietsAlexandra Viets is a writer/screenwriter and journalist whose work focuses on women and dislocation. Her first feature-length screenplay, Cotton Mary, won a New York Foundation for the Arts award and was produced by Merchant Ivory. Her film/theater reviews and essays have appeared in publications such as The International Herald Tribune/NYT, The Far Eastern Economic Review and the Asia Wall Street Journal. Viets has taught in the MFA programs at Towson University’s Department of Theater Arts and at The American University in Washington, DC, specializing in literature and film. She currently teaches in the MA in Writing Program at Johns Hopkins University. Excerpts from her memoir entitled, Maryna, After the War, have been published in Thin Air, Nowhere Magazine and shortlisted for Wasafiri’s New Writing Prize in London. Viets received her B.A. from Oberlin College in political science and an MFA from Columbia University.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235254
Frank Harmon
ABSTRACTOur homes are our unwritten autobiographies, the places to which we are most emotionally attached. As such, our houses should be as unique as we are, satisfying our deepest desires and enriching our lives in our specific time and place. The purpose of this essay was to determine what factors, both physical and emotional, make it possible to design such unique houses for ourselves. For an architect-designed home, what information must be discovered and revealed to the architect to achieve this goal? The author discusses the process he employed over 40 years of designing houses that their owners loved and cherished, beginning with having clients remember and analyze their favorite childhood places. He suggests that “only a detailed, intimate, and uniquely specific description will tender a unique house,” and that “the most valuable guide to what makes you comfortable” – more than photos, magazine clippings, or thousands of links to shelter websites – is the memory of that special childhood place. Determining what made that place so special, he concludes, is the beginning of our journey toward a new home that is as unique as we are.KEYWORDS: Psychology of homecustom homesdesigning unique homesarchitect-designed housesdesigning your own home Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsFrank HarmonFrank Harmon, FAIA, has designed sustainable modern buildings across the Southeast for 40 years. He discovered architecture as a child playing in the streams and woods of his native Greensboro, North Carolina. His work engages pressing contemporary issues such as placelessness, sustainability, and restoration of cities and nature.The buildings he designs are specific to their sites and use materials such as hurricane-felled cypress and rock from local quarries to connect them to their landscapes. Airy breezeways, outdoor living spaces, deep overhangs, and wide lawns embody the vernacular legacy of the South while maintaining a distinguished modernism.Frank is a graduate of the Architectural Association in London and a professor at the North Carolina State University College of Design. He has taught at the Architectural Association and has served as a visiting critic at Harvard, the University of Virginia, and Auburn University’s Rural Studio.His buildings are frequently published and have garnered over 200 design awards. He recently received the AIANC Gold Medal for Architectural Design. ORO Editions published his new book Native Places: Drawing as a Way to See in October 2018.
{"title":"Rooms to Live In: An Architect’s Recollections","authors":"Frank Harmon","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235254","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTOur homes are our unwritten autobiographies, the places to which we are most emotionally attached. As such, our houses should be as unique as we are, satisfying our deepest desires and enriching our lives in our specific time and place. The purpose of this essay was to determine what factors, both physical and emotional, make it possible to design such unique houses for ourselves. For an architect-designed home, what information must be discovered and revealed to the architect to achieve this goal? The author discusses the process he employed over 40 years of designing houses that their owners loved and cherished, beginning with having clients remember and analyze their favorite childhood places. He suggests that “only a detailed, intimate, and uniquely specific description will tender a unique house,” and that “the most valuable guide to what makes you comfortable” – more than photos, magazine clippings, or thousands of links to shelter websites – is the memory of that special childhood place. Determining what made that place so special, he concludes, is the beginning of our journey toward a new home that is as unique as we are.KEYWORDS: Psychology of homecustom homesdesigning unique homesarchitect-designed housesdesigning your own home Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsFrank HarmonFrank Harmon, FAIA, has designed sustainable modern buildings across the Southeast for 40 years. He discovered architecture as a child playing in the streams and woods of his native Greensboro, North Carolina. His work engages pressing contemporary issues such as placelessness, sustainability, and restoration of cities and nature.The buildings he designs are specific to their sites and use materials such as hurricane-felled cypress and rock from local quarries to connect them to their landscapes. Airy breezeways, outdoor living spaces, deep overhangs, and wide lawns embody the vernacular legacy of the South while maintaining a distinguished modernism.Frank is a graduate of the Architectural Association in London and a professor at the North Carolina State University College of Design. He has taught at the Architectural Association and has served as a visiting critic at Harvard, the University of Virginia, and Auburn University’s Rural Studio.His buildings are frequently published and have garnered over 200 design awards. He recently received the AIANC Gold Medal for Architectural Design. ORO Editions published his new book Native Places: Drawing as a Way to See in October 2018.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"307 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235305
Heather Craige
ABSTRACTWhat does it mean to be at home in oneself? How is that sense created, lost, and restored? This paper explores psychoanalytic self-state theory and illustrates its application to the treatment of painful, dissociated states originating in childhood trauma, using a blend of psychoanalytic and somatic approaches.KEYWORDS: Traumaself-statesdissociationchildhoodpsychoanalysissomaticmind-body AcknowledgmentsThis paper was originally presented in September 2017 at the University of North Carolina Friday Center under the title, “Moving into Wholeness: Self-States and the Treatment of Trauma.” Conceived as a talk for early-career therapists, it is written in plain language and suitable for sharing with patients and family members.Dedicated with love to my brother, Vincent Paul Barkley, and to the memory of our sister, Dawn.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Psychic trauma refers to an experience which has an emotionally unbearable quality. Psychic trauma has two ingredients: a difficult or life threatening event, and the lack of sensitive, human support. Because overwhelming experiences at any age may precipitate dissociation, the self-state model can be applied to people of all ages who experience psychic trauma.2 Although this paper does not address the treatment of DID, self-state theory would be a most helpful model for understanding that personality organization. (See psychoanalytic writings of Brenner, Citation2001, Citation2004, Citation2009, Citation2014; Chefetz & Bromberg, Citation2004; Kluft, Citation2000. Other excellent references for treating DID include Fisher, Citation2017; Steele et al., Citation2016; van der Hart et al., Citation2006).Additional informationNotes on contributorsHeather CraigeHeather Craige, MSW, is a clinical social worker, psychoanalyst and somatic experiencing practitioner working in Raleigh, North Carolina. She graduated from the University of North Carolina-Duke Psychoanalytic Institute, now the Psychoanalytic Center of the Carolinas, serves as a training and supervising analyst.
【摘要】自在是什么意思?这种感觉是如何产生、失去和恢复的?本文探讨了精神分析自我状态理论,并说明了其应用于治疗源自童年创伤的痛苦,分离状态,使用精神分析和躯体方法的混合。本文最初于2017年9月在北卡罗来纳大学星期五中心发表,标题为“进入整体性:自我状态和创伤的治疗”。它是为早期职业治疗师设计的演讲,用通俗易懂的语言编写,适合与患者和家庭成员分享。谨以爱献给我的弟弟,文森特·保罗·巴克利,并纪念我们的妹妹,道恩。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1心理创伤是指在情感上无法忍受的经历。精神创伤有两种成分:一种是困难或威胁生命的事件,另一种是缺乏敏感的、人类的支持。因为任何年龄的压倒性经历都可能导致精神分裂,所以自我状态模型可以应用于所有经历过精神创伤的年龄的人虽然本文不涉及DID的治疗,但自我状态理论将是理解人格组织的最有帮助的模型。(参见Brenner的精神分析著作,Citation2001, Citation2004, Citation2009, Citation2014;Chefetz & Bromberg, Citation2004;Kluft Citation2000。其他治疗DID的优秀参考文献包括Fisher, Citation2017;Steele et al., Citation2016;van der Hart et al., Citation2006)。附加信息撰稿人海瑟·克雷格简介海瑟·克雷格,城市生活垃圾,是北卡罗来纳州罗利市的临床社会工作者、精神分析学家和躯体体验实践者。她毕业于北卡罗来纳大学杜克精神分析研究所,现为北卡罗来纳精神分析中心,担任培训和监督分析师。
{"title":"At Home in Oneself: Self-States and the Treatment of Trauma","authors":"Heather Craige","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235305","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWhat does it mean to be at home in oneself? How is that sense created, lost, and restored? This paper explores psychoanalytic self-state theory and illustrates its application to the treatment of painful, dissociated states originating in childhood trauma, using a blend of psychoanalytic and somatic approaches.KEYWORDS: Traumaself-statesdissociationchildhoodpsychoanalysissomaticmind-body AcknowledgmentsThis paper was originally presented in September 2017 at the University of North Carolina Friday Center under the title, “Moving into Wholeness: Self-States and the Treatment of Trauma.” Conceived as a talk for early-career therapists, it is written in plain language and suitable for sharing with patients and family members.Dedicated with love to my brother, Vincent Paul Barkley, and to the memory of our sister, Dawn.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Psychic trauma refers to an experience which has an emotionally unbearable quality. Psychic trauma has two ingredients: a difficult or life threatening event, and the lack of sensitive, human support. Because overwhelming experiences at any age may precipitate dissociation, the self-state model can be applied to people of all ages who experience psychic trauma.2 Although this paper does not address the treatment of DID, self-state theory would be a most helpful model for understanding that personality organization. (See psychoanalytic writings of Brenner, Citation2001, Citation2004, Citation2009, Citation2014; Chefetz & Bromberg, Citation2004; Kluft, Citation2000. Other excellent references for treating DID include Fisher, Citation2017; Steele et al., Citation2016; van der Hart et al., Citation2006).Additional informationNotes on contributorsHeather CraigeHeather Craige, MSW, is a clinical social worker, psychoanalyst and somatic experiencing practitioner working in Raleigh, North Carolina. She graduated from the University of North Carolina-Duke Psychoanalytic Institute, now the Psychoanalytic Center of the Carolinas, serves as a training and supervising analyst.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235251
Sandra G. Hershberg
ABSTRACTThe re-modeling of my consulting room space, as a senior analyst became a transformative process. Through clinical examples that traverse themes of envy, pleasure in the new, loss of the familiar and privileging my subjectivity, the influence of the altered physical setting on my patients, myself, and our relationship is examined. Conceptualizations of my professional home as nest, matricial space, holding environment and selfobject experience are considered along with examples of evocative physical objects in relational and developmental contexts. This nourishing space became a sanctuary while working virtually during the pandemic.KEYWORDS: Psychoanalytic officehomematricial spacetransformationevocative objectholding environment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSandra G. HershbergSandra G. Hershberg, M.D., is a psychoanalyst and adult and child psychiatrist. She is the Director of Psychoanalytic Training, Founding Member and Training and Supervising Analyst at the Institute of Contemporary Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis in Washington, DC. She is a Training and Supervising Analyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis, where she received an award for excellence in teaching in 2019. Dr. Hershberg is a Geographical Supervising Analyst at the St. Louis Institute of Psychoanalysis and the Pittsburgh Psychoanalytic Center. She is a Clinical Associate Professor at Georgetown University Medical School and serves on the Program Committee of the American Psychoanalytic Association. Dr. Hershberg is an Associate Editor of the journal Psychoanalysis, Self and Context and is on the Editorial Board of Psychoanalytic Inquiry.Dr. Hershberg has published and presented papers on variety of subjects including biography and psychoanalysis, pregnancy and creativity, therapeutic action, ethics, and the mother/daughter relationship. Her most recent papers include Mothering a Child with a Visible Facial Difference: The Gaze of the Mother and the Gaze of the Other and A Female Gaze in/on the Female Body in Art and Psychoanalysis: Paula Modersohn-Becker. Dr. Hershberg is the Co-Editor and a contributor to the book Psychoanalytic Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice: Reading Joseph D. Lichtenberg published by Routledge in 2016. In 2021 she co-edited an issue of Psychoanalytic Inquiry entitled Writing a New Playbook: Confronting Theoretical and Clinical Challenges of the Twin Pandemics of COVID-19 and Systemic Racism.
作为一名高级分析师,我对咨询室空间的重新建模成为了一个变革的过程。通过临床实例,贯穿嫉妒、对新事物的愉悦、对熟悉事物的丧失和对我主体性的特权等主题,改变的身体环境对我的病人、我自己和我们的关系的影响被检验了。将我的职业之家概念化为巢,物质空间,持有环境和自我客体体验,并在关系和发展背景下考虑唤起物理对象的例子。在疫情期间,这个滋养空间成为了一个避难所。关键词:精神分析、办公室、家居、空间转换、唤起性客体持有环境披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:sandra G. Hershberg,医学博士,精神分析学家,成人和儿童精神病学家。她是华盛顿特区当代心理治疗和精神分析研究所的精神分析培训主任、创始成员、培训和监督分析师。她是华盛顿巴尔的摩精神分析中心的培训和监督分析师,并于2019年获得了卓越教学奖。Hershberg博士是圣路易斯精神分析研究所和匹兹堡精神分析中心的地理监督分析师。她是乔治城大学医学院的临床副教授,也是美国精神分析协会项目委员会的成员。赫什伯格博士是《精神分析、自我与情境》杂志的副主编,也是《精神分析探究》杂志的编辑委员会成员。赫什伯格发表并发表了各种主题的论文,包括传记和精神分析、怀孕和创造力、治疗行为、伦理和母女关系。她最近的论文包括《用明显的面部差异养育一个孩子:母亲的凝视和他者的凝视》和《艺术和精神分析中女性对女性身体的凝视:宝拉·莫德索恩-贝克尔》。赫什伯格博士是《精神分析理论、研究和临床实践:阅读约瑟夫·d·利希滕贝格》一书的共同编辑和撰稿人,该书于2016年由劳特利奇出版社出版。2021年,她与人合编了一期《精神分析探究》,题为《撰写新剧本:面对COVID-19和系统性种族主义双重流行病的理论和临床挑战》。
{"title":"A Space Odyssey: The Impact of Changing the Physical Aspects of the Analytic Setting on the Analyst, the Patient and Their Relationship","authors":"Sandra G. Hershberg","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235251","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe re-modeling of my consulting room space, as a senior analyst became a transformative process. Through clinical examples that traverse themes of envy, pleasure in the new, loss of the familiar and privileging my subjectivity, the influence of the altered physical setting on my patients, myself, and our relationship is examined. Conceptualizations of my professional home as nest, matricial space, holding environment and selfobject experience are considered along with examples of evocative physical objects in relational and developmental contexts. This nourishing space became a sanctuary while working virtually during the pandemic.KEYWORDS: Psychoanalytic officehomematricial spacetransformationevocative objectholding environment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSandra G. HershbergSandra G. Hershberg, M.D., is a psychoanalyst and adult and child psychiatrist. She is the Director of Psychoanalytic Training, Founding Member and Training and Supervising Analyst at the Institute of Contemporary Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis in Washington, DC. She is a Training and Supervising Analyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis, where she received an award for excellence in teaching in 2019. Dr. Hershberg is a Geographical Supervising Analyst at the St. Louis Institute of Psychoanalysis and the Pittsburgh Psychoanalytic Center. She is a Clinical Associate Professor at Georgetown University Medical School and serves on the Program Committee of the American Psychoanalytic Association. Dr. Hershberg is an Associate Editor of the journal Psychoanalysis, Self and Context and is on the Editorial Board of Psychoanalytic Inquiry.Dr. Hershberg has published and presented papers on variety of subjects including biography and psychoanalysis, pregnancy and creativity, therapeutic action, ethics, and the mother/daughter relationship. Her most recent papers include Mothering a Child with a Visible Facial Difference: The Gaze of the Mother and the Gaze of the Other and A Female Gaze in/on the Female Body in Art and Psychoanalysis: Paula Modersohn-Becker. Dr. Hershberg is the Co-Editor and a contributor to the book Psychoanalytic Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice: Reading Joseph D. Lichtenberg published by Routledge in 2016. In 2021 she co-edited an issue of Psychoanalytic Inquiry entitled Writing a New Playbook: Confronting Theoretical and Clinical Challenges of the Twin Pandemics of COVID-19 and Systemic Racism.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"440 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235441
Sandra G. Hershberg
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSandra G. HershbergSandra G. Hershberg, M.D., is a psychoanalyst and adult and child psychiatrist. She is the Director of Psychoanalytic Training, Founding Member and Training and Supervising Analyst at the Institute of Contemporary Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis in Washington, DC. She is a Training and Supervising Analyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis, where she received an award for excellence in teaching in 2019. Dr. Hershberg is a Geographical Supervising Analyst at the St. Louis Institute of Psychoanalysis and the Pittsburgh Psychoanalytic Center. She is a Clinical Associate Professor at Georgetown University Medical School and serves on the Program Committee of the American Psychoanalytic Association. Dr. Hershberg is an Associate Editor of the journal Psychoanalysis, Self and Context and is on the Editorial Board of Psychoanalytic Inquiry.Dr. Hershberg has published and presented papers on variety of subjects including biography and psychoanalysis, pregnancy and creativity, therapeutic action, ethics, and the mother/daughter relationship. Her most recent papers include Mothering a Child with a Visible Facial Difference: The Gaze of the Mother and the Gaze of the Other and A Female Gaze in/on the Female Body in Art and Psychoanalysis: Paula Modersohn-Becker. Dr. Hershberg is the Co-Editor and a contributor to the book Psychoanalytic Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice: Reading Joseph D. Lichtenberg published by Routledge in 2016. In 2021 she co-edited an issue of Psychoanalytic Inquiry entitled Writing a New Playbook: Confronting Theoretical and Clinical Challenges of the Twin Pandemics of COVID-19 and Systemic Racism.
点击放大图片点击缩小图片披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:sandra G. Hershberg,医学博士,精神分析学家,成人和儿童精神病学家。她是华盛顿特区当代心理治疗和精神分析研究所的精神分析培训主任、创始成员、培训和监督分析师。她是华盛顿巴尔的摩精神分析中心的培训和监督分析师,并于2019年获得了卓越教学奖。Hershberg博士是圣路易斯精神分析研究所和匹兹堡精神分析中心的地理监督分析师。她是乔治城大学医学院的临床副教授,也是美国精神分析协会项目委员会的成员。赫什伯格博士是《精神分析、自我与情境》杂志的副主编,也是《精神分析探究》杂志的编辑委员会成员。赫什伯格发表并发表了各种主题的论文,包括传记和精神分析、怀孕和创造力、治疗行为、伦理和母女关系。她最近的论文包括《用明显的面部差异养育一个孩子:母亲的凝视和他者的凝视》和《艺术和精神分析中女性对女性身体的凝视:宝拉·莫德索恩-贝克尔》。赫什伯格博士是《精神分析理论、研究和临床实践:阅读约瑟夫·d·利希滕贝格》一书的共同编辑和撰稿人,该书于2016年由劳特利奇出版社出版。2021年,她与人合编了一期《精神分析探究》,题为《撰写新剧本:面对COVID-19和系统性种族主义双重流行病的理论和临床挑战》。
{"title":"Epilogue: HOME","authors":"Sandra G. Hershberg","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235441","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235441","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSandra G. HershbergSandra G. Hershberg, M.D., is a psychoanalyst and adult and child psychiatrist. She is the Director of Psychoanalytic Training, Founding Member and Training and Supervising Analyst at the Institute of Contemporary Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis in Washington, DC. She is a Training and Supervising Analyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis, where she received an award for excellence in teaching in 2019. Dr. Hershberg is a Geographical Supervising Analyst at the St. Louis Institute of Psychoanalysis and the Pittsburgh Psychoanalytic Center. She is a Clinical Associate Professor at Georgetown University Medical School and serves on the Program Committee of the American Psychoanalytic Association. Dr. Hershberg is an Associate Editor of the journal Psychoanalysis, Self and Context and is on the Editorial Board of Psychoanalytic Inquiry.Dr. Hershberg has published and presented papers on variety of subjects including biography and psychoanalysis, pregnancy and creativity, therapeutic action, ethics, and the mother/daughter relationship. Her most recent papers include Mothering a Child with a Visible Facial Difference: The Gaze of the Mother and the Gaze of the Other and A Female Gaze in/on the Female Body in Art and Psychoanalysis: Paula Modersohn-Becker. Dr. Hershberg is the Co-Editor and a contributor to the book Psychoanalytic Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice: Reading Joseph D. Lichtenberg published by Routledge in 2016. In 2021 she co-edited an issue of Psychoanalytic Inquiry entitled Writing a New Playbook: Confronting Theoretical and Clinical Challenges of the Twin Pandemics of COVID-19 and Systemic Racism.","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2023.2235371
Linda Gunsberg
ABSTRACTThis article addresses the similar effects on the very young child of abrupt weaning after breastfeeding, and overnight parenting access with the father when the mother is the primary caretaker and the child is primarily attached to the mother’s home as their home. The role of the young child’s unconscious fantasies is considered, particularly in perceiving the mother in these situations as rejecting, hostile and persecutory towards the young child, as well as the short-term and long-term effects of these early experiences on child, adolescent and adult development. The conflict existing between the application of sound psychoanalytic child development theory and research and the legal Best Interests of the Child standard is raised for discussion. Finally, how these adverse experiences impact on the creation and use of nostalgia are addressed.KEYWORDS: Homesicknessseparation/divorcebreastfeeding/weaningovernight parenting accessabandonmentfantasiesnostalgia AcknowledgmentsI am indebted to Vivian Eskin, Ph.D., who introduced me to Melanie Klein’s contributions on weaning and the role of the young child’s unconscious fantasy life in how such developmental experiences are internalized. I also wish to acknowledge Anice Jeffries for her important questions raised regarding the concept of home and home-base, which took place in multiple communications while writing this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 These mothers were not patients of mine. They consulted me solely due to the extreme distress manifested by their young children. The children ranged in age from 10 to 24 months. The pilot study consisted of 4 boy and 4 girls, all first-born children. Fathers were not participants in the pilot study since the focus was on the distressed infants/toddlers in the homes of their primary caretakers. According to these mothers, the fathers did not notice any signs of distress when their infants/toddlers were with them.2 Krystal’s (Citation1978) seminal paper on early trauma reveals going to sleep as a defense against trauma.3 Different authors have observed young children’s separations from their mothers under very different circumstances and for very different periods of time. However, the responses of the young children seem similar.4 The author is not addressing situations where infants and young children live half-time with each parent since the beginning of the child’s life. Situations addressed in this article refer to primary time with the mother and the introduction of greater increments of time with the father.5 Since the young children I referred to in my pilot study were only beginning to be verbal, it was not possible to know that children experienced spending time with their father and going to their father’s home as their mother not loving them. I had the opportunity to follow up on these children as they became more verbal, and it was at a later time that some of the children e
{"title":"Homesickness: Its Particular Relevance to Children of Separation and Divorce","authors":"Linda Gunsberg","doi":"10.1080/07351690.2023.2235371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2235371","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article addresses the similar effects on the very young child of abrupt weaning after breastfeeding, and overnight parenting access with the father when the mother is the primary caretaker and the child is primarily attached to the mother’s home as their home. The role of the young child’s unconscious fantasies is considered, particularly in perceiving the mother in these situations as rejecting, hostile and persecutory towards the young child, as well as the short-term and long-term effects of these early experiences on child, adolescent and adult development. The conflict existing between the application of sound psychoanalytic child development theory and research and the legal Best Interests of the Child standard is raised for discussion. Finally, how these adverse experiences impact on the creation and use of nostalgia are addressed.KEYWORDS: Homesicknessseparation/divorcebreastfeeding/weaningovernight parenting accessabandonmentfantasiesnostalgia AcknowledgmentsI am indebted to Vivian Eskin, Ph.D., who introduced me to Melanie Klein’s contributions on weaning and the role of the young child’s unconscious fantasy life in how such developmental experiences are internalized. I also wish to acknowledge Anice Jeffries for her important questions raised regarding the concept of home and home-base, which took place in multiple communications while writing this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 These mothers were not patients of mine. They consulted me solely due to the extreme distress manifested by their young children. The children ranged in age from 10 to 24 months. The pilot study consisted of 4 boy and 4 girls, all first-born children. Fathers were not participants in the pilot study since the focus was on the distressed infants/toddlers in the homes of their primary caretakers. According to these mothers, the fathers did not notice any signs of distress when their infants/toddlers were with them.2 Krystal’s (Citation1978) seminal paper on early trauma reveals going to sleep as a defense against trauma.3 Different authors have observed young children’s separations from their mothers under very different circumstances and for very different periods of time. However, the responses of the young children seem similar.4 The author is not addressing situations where infants and young children live half-time with each parent since the beginning of the child’s life. Situations addressed in this article refer to primary time with the mother and the introduction of greater increments of time with the father.5 Since the young children I referred to in my pilot study were only beginning to be verbal, it was not possible to know that children experienced spending time with their father and going to their father’s home as their mother not loving them. I had the opportunity to follow up on these children as they became more verbal, and it was at a later time that some of the children e","PeriodicalId":46458,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Inquiry","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136064752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}