Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100506
Chang Xu , Jianguang Hu , Lu Li
This paper investigates the impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on the digital innovation of China’s A-share listed companies, drawing upon the theoretical framework of functional industrial policy. The results indicate that the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative effectively enhances the level of firms’ digital innovation. The underlying mechanisms are identified as the alleviation of financing constraints and the enhancement of ESG performance. Heterogeneity analysis further demonstrates that the positive impact is more pronounced among state-owned enterprises, firms in key-involved industries, large-scale firms, and those operating in capital-intensive sectors. Further research suggests that the Belt and Road Initiative primarily influences open digital innovation. This study advances the understanding of the effects of functional industrial policies, while offering meaningful insights for firm-level digital innovation.
{"title":"Functional industrial policy effects of the Belt and Road Initiative: evidence from digital innovation","authors":"Chang Xu , Jianguang Hu , Lu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100506","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100506","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on the digital innovation of China’s A-share listed companies, drawing upon the theoretical framework of functional industrial policy. The results indicate that the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative effectively enhances the level of firms’ digital innovation. The underlying mechanisms are identified as the alleviation of financing constraints and the enhancement of ESG performance. Heterogeneity analysis further demonstrates that the positive impact is more pronounced among state-owned enterprises, firms in key-involved industries, large-scale firms, and those operating in capital-intensive sectors. Further research suggests that the Belt and Road Initiative primarily influences open digital innovation. This study advances the understanding of the effects of functional industrial policies, while offering meaningful insights for firm-level digital innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145219391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-06-21DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100486
Raden Roro Widya Ningtyas Soeprajitno, Ainun Na'im, Fuad Rakhman
This study examines the effects of government policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic on management decisions on earnings. While existing studies usually treat a crisis as a single event, in this study, we disentangle the two contrasting forces typically present during a crisis, one increasing and the other decreasing the severity of the crisis. We use the government policy BSG index issued by the University of Oxford COVID-19 Project to identify these types and to measure the extent of the policies issued by governments worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic that affect the uncertainty about the future of business and the economy. Our sample includes public firms from 74 countries, with a total observation of 57,758 firm-years from 2020 to 2022. We find that different policies have different effects on earnings management. Specifically, our results show that containment policies reduce earnings management while economic policies increase earnings management. This study contributes to the literature on how government policies and prolonged economic shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, affect earnings management. We believe that our ability to disentangle the two contrasting forces in a crisis and separately examine their effects on earnings management is the novelty of this study. Our results provide policymakers with insights into the impact of the governments’ policies on management decisions, especially on reported earnings.
{"title":"The effects of government policies during the COVID-19 pandemic on earnings management","authors":"Raden Roro Widya Ningtyas Soeprajitno, Ainun Na'im, Fuad Rakhman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100486","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100486","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the effects of government policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic on management decisions on earnings. While existing studies usually treat a crisis as a single event, in this study, we disentangle the two contrasting forces typically present during a crisis, one increasing and the other decreasing the severity of the crisis. We use the government policy BSG index issued by the University of Oxford COVID-19 Project to identify these types and to measure the extent of the policies issued by governments worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic that affect the uncertainty about the future of business and the economy. Our sample includes public firms from 74 countries, with a total observation of 57,758 firm-years from 2020 to 2022. We find that different policies have different effects on earnings management. Specifically, our results show that containment policies reduce earnings management while economic policies increase earnings management. This study contributes to the literature on how government policies and prolonged economic shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, affect earnings management. We believe that our ability to disentangle the two contrasting forces in a crisis and separately examine their effects on earnings management is the novelty of this study. Our results provide policymakers with insights into the impact of the governments’ policies on management decisions, especially on reported earnings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144556724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-03DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100501
Hannah E. Richards , Yuan Shi , Hongkang Xu
We examine whether product recalls impact the likelihood of disclosure and quality of non-GAAP earnings. With increased scrutiny, firms may limit voluntary disclosures or use them to counteract negative publicity. Similarly, product recalls could motivate firms to report higher-quality non-GAAP earnings to provide a more accurate view of the financial impact of product recalls or report more aggressive non-GAAP earnings to counteract the decline in financial performance. Using a sample period of 2004 to 2017, we find that firms are less likely to disclose non-GAAP earnings after announcing a product recall. For firms that choose to release non-GAAP earnings after announcing a product recall, we find that the quality of non-GAAP earnings improves. This finding suggests that product recalls may prompt firms to adopt more conservative reporting practices, both in terms of the likelihood and quality of disclosures. Our study provides insights into firms’ strategic disclosure decisions and highlights the nuanced ways firms manage non-GAAP disclosures to navigate the challenges posed by product recalls.
{"title":"The impact of product recalls on Non-GAAP reporting decisions","authors":"Hannah E. Richards , Yuan Shi , Hongkang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100501","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100501","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine whether product recalls impact the likelihood of disclosure and quality of non-GAAP earnings. With increased scrutiny, firms may limit voluntary disclosures or use them to counteract negative publicity. Similarly, product recalls could motivate firms to report higher-quality non-GAAP earnings to provide a more accurate view of the financial impact of product recalls or report more aggressive non-GAAP earnings to counteract the decline in financial performance. Using a sample period of 2004 to 2017, we find that firms are less likely to disclose non-GAAP earnings after announcing a product recall. For firms that choose to release non-GAAP earnings after announcing a product recall, we find that the quality of non-GAAP earnings improves. This finding suggests that product recalls may prompt firms to adopt more conservative reporting practices, both in terms of the likelihood and quality of disclosures. Our study provides insights into firms’ strategic disclosure decisions and highlights the nuanced ways firms manage non-GAAP disclosures to navigate the challenges posed by product recalls.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145104638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100508
Omer Unsal
This study explores how CEOs with medical degrees (M.D.) impact mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. We discover that doctor CEOs tend to engage in fewer M&A deals, but when they do, these transactions show better outcomes. Investors respond positively to mergers led by M.D. CEOs, signaling confidence in their decisions. Similarly, target firms led by doctor CEOs experience positive market reactions, lasting up to 20 %. Rather than engaging in frequent mergers, doctor CEOs form a greater number of strategic alliances, expand their businesses, and produce more medical innovation. Overall, this study sheds light on the distinctive strategies employed by doctor CEOs in the pharmaceutical industry, providing valuable insights for ever-changing landscape of healthcare business.
{"title":"From stethoscopes to boardrooms: CEOs’ medical degree and merger performance","authors":"Omer Unsal","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100508","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100508","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how CEOs with medical degrees (M.D.) impact mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. We discover that doctor CEOs tend to engage in fewer M&A deals, but when they do, these transactions show better outcomes. Investors respond positively to mergers led by M.D. CEOs, signaling confidence in their decisions. Similarly, target firms led by doctor CEOs experience positive market reactions, lasting up to 20 %. Rather than engaging in frequent mergers, doctor CEOs form a greater number of strategic alliances, expand their businesses, and produce more medical innovation. Overall, this study sheds light on the distinctive strategies employed by doctor CEOs in the pharmaceutical industry, providing valuable insights for ever-changing landscape of healthcare business.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145219389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100503
Atul Singh , Vicki Wei Tang
We examine whether social media presence and engagement have a feedback effect on corporate investment efficiency. Utilizing 352 million responses from the corporate Twitter accounts of 2062 US firms, we find that both underinvesting and overinvesting firms deviate less from predicted investment levels after initiating presence on Twitter. Furthermore, the more engaged the followers are, the smaller the deviation from expected investment levels. The effects are robust to including information incorporated in stock prices and other information sources. Our findings provide evidence that managerial learning is one channel underlying the link between social media and corporate investment efficiency. Cross-sectional results suggest that the managerial learning effect is more pronounced for consumer-facing firms. We also find that underinvesting firms learn from their peers’ social media presence. Additionally, firms’ operational efficiency also improves, corroborating the feedback effect of social media. Additional tests rule out endogeneity-related issues.
{"title":"Feedback effect of social media on corporate investment Efficiency: Evidence from Firm’s Twitter presence and engagement","authors":"Atul Singh , Vicki Wei Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100503","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100503","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine whether social media presence and engagement have a feedback effect on corporate investment efficiency. Utilizing 352 million responses from the corporate Twitter accounts of 2062 US firms, we find that both underinvesting and overinvesting firms deviate less from predicted investment levels after initiating presence on Twitter. Furthermore, the more engaged the followers are, the smaller the deviation from expected investment levels. The effects are robust to including information incorporated in stock prices and other information sources. Our findings provide evidence that managerial learning is one channel underlying the link between social media and corporate investment efficiency. Cross-sectional results suggest that the managerial learning effect is more pronounced for consumer-facing firms. We also find that underinvesting firms learn from their peers’ social media presence. Additionally, firms’ operational efficiency also improves, corroborating the <em>feedback</em> effect of social media. Additional tests rule out endogeneity-related issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145018966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100497
Yunsen Chen , Zizhen Feng , Yao Yu , Wei Yuan
We examine the capital market consequences of the exercise of rights by the regulatory minority shareholder. Using a manually collected sample from the China Securities Investor Services Center (CSISC), a novel regulatory investor protection institution controlled by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, we employ a stacked difference-in-differences model in our main regression analysis to estimate the impact of the CSISC’s actions. We find that the CSISC’s exercise of rights has a risk signaling effect, increasing perceived risk among investors, which is reflected in reduced stock liquidity and an increased cost of equity. Event studies indicate negative market reactions to actions taken by the CSISC against targeted firms. Additional analyses show that a negative tone and increased investor attention toward the CSISC’s actions further amplify the market responses. Cross-sectional analyses reveal a stronger effect for firms with regulatory alliances, while effective internal governance mitigates this effect. Collectively, our study highlights the market consequences of the regulator-led minority shareholder’s interventions in an emerging market that lacks strong private enforcement.
{"title":"The capital market consequences of the regulator-led minority shareholder: Evidence from China","authors":"Yunsen Chen , Zizhen Feng , Yao Yu , Wei Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100497","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100497","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the capital market consequences of the exercise of rights by the regulatory minority shareholder. Using a manually collected sample from the China Securities Investor Services Center (CSISC), a novel regulatory investor protection institution controlled by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, we employ a stacked difference-in-differences model in our main regression analysis to estimate the impact of the CSISC’s actions. We find that the CSISC’s exercise of rights has a risk signaling effect, increasing perceived risk among investors, which is reflected in reduced stock liquidity and an increased cost of equity. Event studies indicate negative market reactions to actions taken by the CSISC against targeted firms. Additional analyses show that a negative tone and increased investor attention toward the CSISC’s actions further amplify the market responses. Cross-sectional analyses reveal a stronger effect for firms with regulatory alliances, while effective internal governance mitigates this effect. Collectively, our study highlights the market consequences of the regulator-led minority shareholder’s interventions in an emerging market that lacks strong private enforcement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144771713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100512
Stephanie J. Rasmussen , Suye Wang
A firm’s top in-house legal executive acts as a trusted advisor to top management and the board of directors, and the top legal executive role has become more prominent in recent years due to heightened regulatory focus on business compliance. In this study, we develop a measure of the top legal executive’s influence in the acquiring firm and examine whether top legal executive influence is associated with merger and acquisition (M&A) outcomes. We find that top legal executive influence is associated with shorter public process length (merger announcement to deal resolution), higher likelihood of deal completion, and lower likelihood of acquirer-protective contract terms. These associations exist after controlling for potential endogeneity of top legal executive influence. Cross-sectional tests also provide some evidence that the top legal executive emphasizes a monitoring role in M&A deals involving high uncertainty and when independence concerns should be more prevalent.
{"title":"Acquirers’ top legal executives and merger and acquisition outcomes","authors":"Stephanie J. Rasmussen , Suye Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100512","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100512","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A firm’s top in-house legal executive acts as a trusted advisor to top management and the board of directors, and the top legal executive role has become more prominent in recent years due to heightened regulatory focus on business compliance. In this study, we develop a measure of the top legal executive’s influence in the acquiring firm and examine whether top legal executive influence is associated with merger and acquisition (M&A) outcomes. We find that top legal executive influence is associated with shorter public process length (merger announcement to deal resolution), higher likelihood of deal completion, and lower likelihood of acquirer-protective contract terms. These associations exist after controlling for potential endogeneity of top legal executive influence. Cross-sectional tests also provide some evidence that the top legal executive emphasizes a monitoring role in M&A deals involving high uncertainty and when independence concerns should be more prevalent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145319781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-06-22DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100490
Kimberly S. Krieg , John Li
We investigate the relationship between diverse tax planning and a firm’s level of tax risk. Prior studies have suggested that firms face a trade-off between engaging in tax avoidance and managing exposure to tax risk, defined as the volatility of future tax outcomes. We propose that firms may be able to achieve both objectives by diversifying their portfolios of tax avoidance strategies. We create two measures of diversification based on two different ways of measuring tax avoidance. Using these two measures, we find that tax strategy diversification benefits firms in two ways. First, when holding the level of tax avoidance constant, increasing diversification reduces the firm’s exposure to tax risk. Second, when firms increase their level of tax avoidance, having higher diversification mitigates the impact of the increased tax avoidance on their tax risk exposure. Our study highlights the benefits of firms engaging in a diverse portfolio of tax strategies and shows that the relationship between tax avoidance and tax risk is contingent on the firm’s diversification, which may provide an explanation for the mixed evidence found in prior literature.
{"title":"Does diverse tax planning reduce tax risk?","authors":"Kimberly S. Krieg , John Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100490","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100490","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate the relationship between diverse tax planning and a firm’s level of tax risk. Prior studies have suggested that firms face a trade-off between engaging in tax avoidance and managing exposure to tax risk, defined as the volatility of future tax outcomes. We propose that firms may be able to achieve both objectives by diversifying their portfolios of tax avoidance strategies. We create two measures of diversification based on two different ways of measuring tax avoidance. Using these two measures, we find that tax strategy diversification benefits firms in two ways. First, when holding the level of tax avoidance constant, increasing diversification reduces the firm’s exposure to tax risk. Second, when firms increase their level of tax avoidance, having higher diversification mitigates the impact of the increased tax avoidance on their tax risk exposure. Our study highlights the benefits of firms engaging in a diverse portfolio of tax strategies and shows that the relationship between tax avoidance and tax risk is contingent on the firm’s diversification, which may provide an explanation for the mixed evidence found in prior literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144500996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-31DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100477
Chen Zheng, Zhiyue Sun
Despite growing evidence of the importance of organisation capital, its impact on corporate resilience remains underexplored. This study investigates whether organisation capital provides firms with greater resilience and reduces their exposure to climate change. By analysing a sample of 3,622 US firms from 2001 to 2021, we found that firms with high organisation capital experienced less climate change exposure. This result remained robust across various tests and methods to address endogeneity concerns. Furthermore, organisation capital was found to act as a mediator or suppressor in the relationship between firm-specific factors – such as financial constraints, analyst forecast quality, agency costs, financial leverage, corporate governance, firm performance, efficiency, operating performance, product market competition, and environmental commitment and initiative – and climate change exposure. Overall, our results underscore the resilience benefits provided by organisation capital and highlight its critical role in mitigating climate-related risks.
{"title":"Organisation capital: A key asset for mitigating firm-level climate change exposure","authors":"Chen Zheng, Zhiyue Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100477","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100477","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite growing evidence of the importance of organisation capital, its impact on corporate resilience remains underexplored. This study investigates whether organisation capital provides firms with greater resilience and reduces their exposure to climate change. By analysing a sample of 3,622 US firms from 2001 to 2021, we found that firms with high organisation capital experienced less climate change exposure. This result remained robust across various tests and methods to address endogeneity concerns. Furthermore, organisation capital was found to act as a mediator or suppressor in the relationship between firm-specific factors – such as financial constraints, analyst forecast quality, agency costs, financial leverage, corporate governance, firm performance, efficiency, operating performance, product market competition, and environmental commitment and initiative – and climate change exposure. Overall, our results underscore the resilience benefits provided by organisation capital and highlight its critical role in mitigating climate-related risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144239382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100499
Zhenghao Chang , Hang Zhou , Mengyu Ruan , Qin Li
The phenomenon of different ESG rating agencies evaluating the same firm’s ESG performance differently has attracted widespread attention. This study examines how customer concentration influences ESG rating disagreement using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies spanning 2015–2022. Our findings demonstrate that customer concentration significantly increases ESG rating disagreement, with results remaining robust across various robustness tests. Dimensional analysis reveals that customer concentration exhibits a positive correlation with rating disagreements in the social (S) and governance (G) dimensions, while showing no significant relationship with disagreements in the environmental (E) dimension. Through mechanism testing, we identify three mechanisms: the quantity of ESG information disclosures, inventory turnover, and the stability of the top management team. Heterogeneity analysis further demonstrates that customer concentration exerts a more pronounced positive influence on ESG rating disagreement among firms operating in highly competitive industries, companies experiencing low supply and demand deviations, and industries significantly affected by supply chain dynamics. These findings contribute substantively to the literature examining both the role of customer concentration and the determinants of ESG rating disagreement from a supply chain perspective. The insights provided are crucial for understanding the mechanisms that influence sustainable development practices within firms.
{"title":"When major customers matter: customer concentration and ESG rating disagreement","authors":"Zhenghao Chang , Hang Zhou , Mengyu Ruan , Qin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100499","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100499","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The phenomenon of different ESG rating agencies evaluating the same firm’s ESG performance differently has attracted widespread attention. This study examines how customer concentration influences ESG rating disagreement using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies spanning 2015–2022. Our findings demonstrate that customer concentration significantly increases ESG rating disagreement, with results remaining robust across various robustness tests. Dimensional analysis reveals that customer concentration exhibits a positive correlation with rating disagreements in the social (S) and governance (G) dimensions, while showing no significant relationship with disagreements in the environmental (E) dimension. Through mechanism testing, we identify three mechanisms: the quantity of ESG information disclosures, inventory turnover, and the stability of the top management team. Heterogeneity analysis further demonstrates that customer concentration exerts a more pronounced positive influence on ESG rating disagreement among firms operating in highly competitive industries, companies experiencing low supply and demand deviations, and industries significantly affected by supply chain dynamics. These findings contribute substantively to the literature examining both the role of customer concentration and the determinants of ESG rating disagreement from a supply chain perspective. The insights provided are crucial for understanding the mechanisms that influence sustainable development practices within firms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144826708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}