Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics最新文献

The debate as to whether or not an expanded audit report is informative to the market persists, either from experimental and empirical study perspectives. With the utilization of 4,336 firm-year Chinese observations from 2016 to 2017, this study investigates whether the mandatory disclosure of key audit matters (KAMs) restricts insider trading profitability in China. The main test and robustness tests confirm the significant and negative relationship between KAM disclosure and insider trading profitability in the Chinese capital market. The study further explores the impact of KAMs’ textual characteristics using the KAM data from 2017 to 2020. The results suggest that firm-specific KAMs, longer KAMs, more readable KAMs, and more accurate KAMs reduce the insider trading profitability. Supplementary analysis shows that this effect only exists for opportunistic insider trading. In addition, the effect of KAM disclosure on insider trading profitability is further amplified by high institutional ownership, auditor industry specialization, and KAM with goodwill impairment matter. Overall, the study presents some evidence of the communicative value of KAM disclosure and provides a practical means to restrict insiders’ opportunistic behavior, highlighting the decision-making usefulness of KAMs for external investors.

We examine the influence of concerns relating to violation of the borrowing covenant on the investors’ valuation of Level 3 fair value adjustments. We reason that managerial bias in Level 3 fair value estimation is greater for firms approaching violation of the borrowing covenant. Based on a sample of Australian real estate firms, we find that managers report upward adjustments to Level 3 investment property values when they approach the threshold where the borrowing covenant is violated; and further find that this deliberate use of discretion is significant for firms closer to the interest coverage thresholds, but not for those approaching the gearing thresholds. We then find that, while fair value adjustments are priced positively, investors apply incremental discounts for firms closer to the violation threshold, or firms which are in technical default of borrowing covenants relative to those that are far from violation. Additionally, we show that the pricing discount on fair value adjustments attributable to the concern over covenant violation is significant only for the weaker governance sub-sample, indicating that effective monitoring mitigates faithful representation concerns about Level 3 fair value estimations.

This study examines whether brand capital is associated with debt maturity choice. For listed firms in the U.S. over the period from 1975 to 2019, we find that investment in brand capital through ongoing advertising outlays is positively related to the use of short-term debt. The result is consistent with the hypothesis that high brand capital firms use short-term debt because of beneficial signaling effects. We also find the positive effect of brand capital on the use of short-term debt is more pronounced for higher quality firms and firms with lower financial constraints, which provides further support for the signaling explanation. Finally, we show that brand capital decreases the extent to which investments are financed by using long-term debt and increases the extent to which investments are financed by using short-term debt and equity.

We examine the relationship between uncertain linguistic tone and credit default swap (CDS) spreads. Using an event study approach, we first show that uncertain linguistic tone in 10-Q/K filings is positively associated with CDS spread changes incremental to positive and negative tone and incremental to the response implied by equity market reactions to the same information. We further demonstrate that the relationship of uncertain tone to CDS spreads manifests largely through its impact on asset volatility. We show that this effect is driven by firms with high leverage and is stronger among firms with shorter relative to longer maturities. Our findings contribute to growing research into credit market reactions to non-quantitative information by demonstrating a positive relationship between credit market responses and uncertainty disclosure language, and that this relationship is mediated by investors’ implied asset volatility estimates.

Exploiting a unique regulatory framework for IPO pricing in India, which allows us to estimate voluntary and aftermarket underpricing, we answer whether specific use of proceeds explains underpricing in the pre- and aftermarket. Our main findings are as follows. First, we document that disclosure of specific use of proceeds increases actual voluntary underpricing (i.e., offer price being lower) in the premarket and lowers aftermarket underpricing (i.e., the first-day closing price is lower). Second, the premarket effect is pronounced for firms with greater information asymmetry, whereas the aftermarket effect is pronounced for firms with higher investor sentiment. Our core findings are robust to tests that mitigate endogeneity concerns. Collectively, we show that disclosure impacts underpricing differently in the pre- and aftermarket.

We study firms that engage in strategic alliances and investigate the link between a firm’s investment and the accounting quality of its partners. Given the view of the firm as a nexus of contractual relationships, we expect that alliance partner information will help investors monitor the firm. In line with this expectation, we show that partner firms’ accounting quality reduces both over- and underinvestment in the focal firm. We also test the role of partner firms’ accounting quality in multisegment firms, in which agency conflicts are more acute. We find that the accounting quality of partner firms reduces the diversification discount in these firms.

This study investigates the impact of the direct and indirect effects of CEO overconfidence on investment-price sensitivity (IPS). Using a large sample of U.S. S&P 1500 firms from 1993 to 2020, I find a significant negative relationship between CEO overconfidence and investment-price sensitivity. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that the relationship is partially mediated by the level of informed trading. This implies that overconfident CEOs not only resist using external information (direct effect) but also unintentionally diminish their chances to learn from the market by reducing informed trading (indirect effect). This study contributes to the existing literature by highlighting the role of CEO characteristics in shaping the information environment and establishing a causal link between CEO personality traits and corporate decisions.

Do journalists use editorial tools to help investors clarify uncertain earnings performance? This study examines this question in the context of WSJ reporters’ co-coverage choices. Using narrowly beating consensus analyst forecasts as a proxy for earnings evaluation uncertainty, I find that journalists tend to co-cover peers that are more economically related to the announcing firm when it reported earnings that narrowly beat consensus analyst forecasts (“beaters”) than when discussing the earnings of non-beaters. Using intra-day data, I further find that stock investors appear to use the co-covered peers as a benchmark to evaluate the earnings of the beaters but not the earnings of the non-beaters. These findings highlight the usefulness of media’s editorial content to investors.

Prior research establishes that board governance quality measures positively impact firm environmental performance. In this study, we propose an empirical model using structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore additional enhancements to board governance, namely board environmental expertise (BEE) and board social engagement (BSE) and show that they incrementally improve firm environmental performance (EN). Our proposed latent construct measure, BEE, goes beyond traditionally dichotomous measures used in the literature. BEE has a total effect on firm environmental performance that is over two thirds the size of effects arising from traditional governance quality measures (GOV). The second enhancement of our model is the focus on BSE, a novel construct to the CSR literature. In addition to possessing environmental knowledge enabling expertise, we demonstrate that a board with a deeper commitment to society will further improve firm environmental performance. Using SEM, we find that the indirect effects of GOV, BEE, and BSE on EN represent a substantial portion of the total effects on EN. Hence, ignoring these indirect effects would result in substantial understatement of the effects of improvements to governance on environmental performance.

Place attachment is an affective bond whereby people interact with and describe themselves as belonging to specific places. This study investigates the presence of place attachment in the auditing process. Using a large sample of listed clients in China, the findings reveal that auditors are likely to charge higher fees if their colleges are located in the same cities or provinces as their clients, supporting the familiarity bias hypothesis. This effect is more concentrated among smaller auditors, non-state-owned clients, and clients who switch auditors between years. In addition, a negative relationship is found between audit quality and geographical connections between auditors and clients. Overall, the results indicate the existence of place attachment in the auditing process.