Pub Date : 2025-07-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100497
Yunsen Chen , Zizhen Feng , Yao Yu , Wei Yuan
We examine the capital market consequences of the exercise of rights by the regulatory minority shareholder. Using a manually collected sample from the China Securities Investor Services Center (CSISC), a novel regulatory investor protection institution controlled by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, we employ a stacked difference-in-differences model in our main regression analysis to estimate the impact of the CSISC’s actions. We find that the CSISC’s exercise of rights has a risk signaling effect, increasing perceived risk among investors, which is reflected in reduced stock liquidity and an increased cost of equity. Event studies indicate negative market reactions to actions taken by the CSISC against targeted firms. Additional analyses show that a negative tone and increased investor attention toward the CSISC’s actions further amplify the market responses. Cross-sectional analyses reveal a stronger effect for firms with regulatory alliances, while effective internal governance mitigates this effect. Collectively, our study highlights the market consequences of the regulator-led minority shareholder’s interventions in an emerging market that lacks strong private enforcement.
{"title":"The capital market consequences of the regulator-led minority shareholder: Evidence from China","authors":"Yunsen Chen , Zizhen Feng , Yao Yu , Wei Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100497","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100497","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the capital market consequences of the exercise of rights by the regulatory minority shareholder. Using a manually collected sample from the China Securities Investor Services Center (CSISC), a novel regulatory investor protection institution controlled by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, we employ a stacked difference-in-differences model in our main regression analysis to estimate the impact of the CSISC’s actions. We find that the CSISC’s exercise of rights has a risk signaling effect, increasing perceived risk among investors, which is reflected in reduced stock liquidity and an increased cost of equity. Event studies indicate negative market reactions to actions taken by the CSISC against targeted firms. Additional analyses show that a negative tone and increased investor attention toward the CSISC’s actions further amplify the market responses. Cross-sectional analyses reveal a stronger effect for firms with regulatory alliances, while effective internal governance mitigates this effect. Collectively, our study highlights the market consequences of the regulator-led minority shareholder’s interventions in an emerging market that lacks strong private enforcement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144771713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-18DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100496
Aaraadhya Srivastava
In 2016, the Government of India (GoI) implemented the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), a reform aimed at enhancing creditor rights by enabling creditors to swiftly ‘seize’ and ‘liquidate’ a defaulter’s assets within a defined timeframe. This reform was designed to strengthen creditor protections in India. Our study examines the impact of this reform on firm-level innovation. We hypothesize that creditor-friendly reforms improve access to debt capital, thereby encouraging firms to intensify their innovation activities. Utilizing an entropy-balanced difference-in-differences (Entropy-DiD) approach and leveraging pre-reform variation in firms’ ‘proportion of debt’ for identification, we find that firms with a lower pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ increased their R&D investment by 29.4 % more than firms with a higher pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ in the post-IBC period. Supporting our baseline result, we further document that this effect is stronger among more profitable firms within the ‘treated’ group. Our findings are robust to firm-level time-varying control variables, fixed effects for firm and industry by year, and a placebo test using a fictitious IBC promulgation year. These results indicate that stronger creditor rights foster an environment conducive to risk-taking, encouraging firms to pursue ventures that, while risky, hold significant potential for profitability. Consequently, our research highlights the welfare implications of creditor-friendly bankruptcy reforms, providing insights that could inform future policy decisions.
{"title":"Creditor rights and innovation: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment","authors":"Aaraadhya Srivastava","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100496","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100496","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2016, the Government of India (GoI) implemented the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), a reform aimed at enhancing creditor rights by enabling creditors to swiftly ‘seize’ and ‘liquidate’ a defaulter’s assets within a defined timeframe. This reform was designed to strengthen creditor protections in India. Our study examines the impact of this reform on firm-level innovation. We hypothesize that creditor-friendly reforms improve access to debt capital, thereby encouraging firms to intensify their innovation activities. Utilizing an entropy-balanced difference-in-differences (Entropy-DiD) approach and leveraging pre-reform variation in firms’ ‘proportion of debt’ for identification, we find that firms with a lower pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ increased their R&D investment by 29.4 % more than firms with a higher pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ in the post-IBC period. Supporting our baseline result, we further document that this effect is stronger among more profitable firms within the ‘treated’ group. Our findings are robust to firm-level time-varying control variables, fixed effects for firm and industry by year, and a placebo test using a fictitious IBC promulgation year. These results indicate that stronger creditor rights foster an environment conducive to risk-taking, encouraging firms to pursue ventures that, while risky, hold significant potential for profitability. Consequently, our research highlights the welfare implications of creditor-friendly bankruptcy reforms, providing insights that could inform future policy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144670440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100495
Benjamin Angelo
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act protects firms against litigation stemming from forward-looking statements. This paper considers whether these protections contribute to post-earnings announcement drift. The results did not suggest that the inherent uncertainty of forward-looking statements contributes to a delayed price reaction. However, the results provide evidence that backward-looking statements are associated with a delayed price response. This result is consistent with Bernard and Thomas (1990) suggestion that post-earnings announcement drift is caused by investors not fully understanding how current earnings map into future earnings. Overall, the results suggests that the PSLRA does not contribute to post-earnings announcement drift. Further, the results have practical implications for firms. Managers should focus their prepared remarks on the prior performance of the firm and focus their responses during the question-and-answer session on the future performance of the firm.
{"title":"The private securities litigation reform act and post-earnings announcement drift","authors":"Benjamin Angelo","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100495","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100495","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act protects firms against litigation stemming from forward-looking statements. This paper considers whether these protections contribute to post-earnings announcement drift. The results did not suggest that the inherent uncertainty of forward-looking statements contributes to a delayed price reaction. However, the results provide evidence that backward-looking statements are associated with a delayed price response. This result is consistent with <span><span>Bernard and Thomas (1990)</span></span> suggestion that post-earnings announcement drift is caused by investors not fully understanding how current earnings map into future earnings. Overall, the results suggests that the PSLRA does not contribute to post-earnings announcement drift. Further, the results have practical implications for firms. Managers should focus their prepared remarks on the prior performance of the firm and focus their responses during the question-and-answer session on the future performance of the firm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144665805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-10DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100494
Ajit Dayanandan , Han Donker
This study examines the impact of caste networks in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in India during the period 2000-2022. The study finds a strong association between the caste affiliation of the largest shareholders in acquirer and target companies in M&A transactions in India. Employing the event study methodology, the study finds that companies with dominant shareholders belonging to forward castes secure the highest incremental value among all the caste groups. The forward castes display weaker ties with shareholders from other social identities. Overall, our findings support the social identity, homophily, and in-group bias theories, which contend that people form and maintain social and economic connections with people who share their social identities. The M&A clusters in India are networked by caste identities and they try to overcome information asymmetry by relying on alternative channels such social identity. This research points to the need to complement existing markers of M&A like age, functional background, and professional experience of management with critical factors such as social identity like caste in decision-making and organizational outcomes.
{"title":"Caste affiliation and M&A transactions in India","authors":"Ajit Dayanandan , Han Donker","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100494","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100494","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of caste networks in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in India during the period 2000-2022. The study finds a strong association between the caste affiliation of the largest shareholders in acquirer and target companies in M&A transactions in India. Employing the event study methodology, the study finds that companies with dominant shareholders belonging to forward castes secure the highest incremental value among all the caste groups. The forward castes display weaker ties with shareholders from other social identities. Overall, our findings support the social identity, homophily, and in-group bias theories, which contend that people form and maintain social and economic connections with people who share their social identities. The M&A clusters in India are networked by caste identities and they try to overcome information asymmetry by relying on alternative channels such social identity. This research points to the need to complement existing markers of M&A like age, functional background, and professional experience of management with critical factors such as social identity like caste in decision-making and organizational outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144623460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-08DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100493
Tianyu Zhang
We examine how audit quality is affected by spatial arrangements of the audit team, specifically when the signing partners are geographically located in different provinces in China. Our baseline results show that dispersed signing auditors are related to higher audit quality and less audit opinion shopping. Further results suggest that this may be related to the better information and higher level of auditor independence for the geographically dispersed partners, and the effect is strongest when both channels are at work. Additional analyses show that the effect is weaker when coordination costs for geographical dispersion are higher, and we find that dispersed auditors are not related to higher audit fees or longer audit report lag. Overall, our findings underscore the positive influence of signing auditors’ geographical dispersion on audit quality.
{"title":"Geographically dispersed signing auditors and audit quality","authors":"Tianyu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100493","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100493","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine how audit quality is affected by spatial arrangements of the audit team, specifically when the signing partners are geographically located in different provinces in China. Our baseline results show that dispersed signing auditors are related to higher audit quality and less audit opinion shopping. Further results suggest that this may be related to the better information and higher level of auditor independence for the geographically dispersed partners, and the effect is strongest when both channels are at work. Additional analyses show that the effect is weaker when coordination costs for geographical dispersion are higher, and we find that dispersed auditors are not related to higher audit fees or longer audit report lag. Overall, our findings underscore the positive influence of signing auditors’ geographical dispersion on audit quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100493"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144653775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-04DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100492
David Folsom , Md Mahmudul Hasan , Fuzhao Zhou
We examine whether executive-level internal governance affects the extent of tax avoidance in U.S. firms. Internal governance includes processes through which subordinate executives provide checks and balances in firms’ decision-making processes (Cheng et al. 2016). We use a combined empirical measure of the relative length of the key subordinate executives’ decision horizons and their relative influence compared to their respective CEOs to proxy for the strength of subordinate executives’ roles in firms’ internal governance structures. We find that cross-sectional differences in internal governance strength explain differences in proxies of firm-level tax planning. Specifically, we find that firms are more likely to engage in tax strategies that will reduce both short-term and long-term effective tax rates when executive-level internal governance is more robust.
我们考察了高管层内部治理是否会影响美国公司的避税程度。内部治理包括下属高管在公司决策过程中提供制衡的过程(Cheng et al. 2016)。我们使用了一种综合的实证方法来衡量关键下属高管决策视野的相对长度及其相对于各自ceo的相对影响力,以代表下属高管在公司内部治理结构中的角色强度。我们发现内部治理强度的横截面差异解释了公司层面税收筹划代理的差异。具体而言,我们发现,当高管层内部治理更加健全时,企业更有可能采取降低短期和长期有效税率的税收策略。
{"title":"Executive-level internal governance and tax planning","authors":"David Folsom , Md Mahmudul Hasan , Fuzhao Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100492","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100492","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine whether executive-level internal governance affects the extent of tax avoidance in U.S. firms. Internal governance includes processes through which subordinate executives provide checks and balances in firms’ decision-making processes (Cheng et al. 2016). We use a combined empirical measure of the relative length of the key subordinate executives’ decision horizons and their relative influence compared to their respective CEOs to proxy for the strength of subordinate executives’ roles in firms’ internal governance structures. We find that cross-sectional differences in internal governance strength explain differences in proxies of firm-level tax planning. Specifically, we find that firms are more likely to engage in tax strategies that will reduce both short-term and long-term effective tax rates when executive-level internal governance is more robust.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144771718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100491
Yan Zhao, Kun Su, Yiming Xu
This paper aims to clarify the relationship between key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure and corporate financialization. The findings reveal that key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure can provide incremental information value, thereby impeding corporate financialization in China. Moreover, this effect is more pronounced in the samples with low media attention, low institutional investor holdings, and non-state-owned enterprises. Further research indicates that reducing managerial myopia and easing financing constraints serve as key channels through which key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure affects corporate financialization. In addition, the future financialization analysis suggests that key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure has a sustained deterrent effect on financialization rather than just a short-term signaling mechanism. This study provides empirical evidence on efficiently preventing excessive financialization of enterprises, as well as some insights for mitigating systemic financial risks from the key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure perspective.
{"title":"Does key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure affect corporate financialization?","authors":"Yan Zhao, Kun Su, Yiming Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100491","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100491","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper aims to clarify the relationship between key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure and corporate financialization. The findings reveal that key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure can provide incremental information value, thereby impeding corporate financialization in China. Moreover, this effect is more pronounced in the samples with low media attention, low institutional investor holdings, and non-state-owned enterprises. Further research indicates that reducing managerial myopia and easing financing constraints serve as key channels through which key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure affects corporate financialization. In addition, the future financialization analysis suggests that key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure has a sustained deterrent effect on financialization rather than just a short-term signaling mechanism. This study provides empirical evidence on efficiently preventing excessive financialization of enterprises, as well as some insights for mitigating systemic financial risks from the key audit matters (KAMs) disclosure perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144579330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100489
Shih-Chu Chou , Sunay Mutlu , Weiwei Wang
We investigate the association between analysts’ revenue forecast coverage and firms’ revenue manipulation. We find that coverage of revenues by financial analysts relative to earnings is positively associated with the magnitude of firms’ discretionary revenues. This finding shows a pressure effect of analysts, where analysts’ revenue forecasts induce incentives for managers to manipulate revenues to meet expectations. Our cross-sectional analyses show that this pressure on discretionary revenues is higher during the fourth fiscal quarter. This effect is also more pronounced for firms whose revenues are more value-relevant and when analysts exhibit greater disagreement over revenue forecasts. Further evidence related to ASC 606, a major GAAP change about revenue accounting, provides corroborating evidence for the pressure effect. Robustness checks confirm the validity of our findings and offer further insights into the role of revenue forecasts in revenue manipulation.
{"title":"Analysts’ revenue forecasts and discretionary revenues","authors":"Shih-Chu Chou , Sunay Mutlu , Weiwei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100489","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100489","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate the association between analysts’ revenue forecast coverage and firms’ revenue manipulation. We find that coverage of revenues by financial analysts relative to earnings is positively associated with the magnitude of firms’ discretionary revenues. This finding shows a pressure effect of analysts, where analysts’ revenue forecasts induce incentives for managers to manipulate revenues to meet expectations. Our cross-sectional analyses show that this pressure on discretionary revenues is higher during the fourth fiscal quarter. This effect is also more pronounced for firms whose revenues are more value-relevant and when analysts exhibit greater disagreement over revenue forecasts. Further evidence related to ASC 606, a major GAAP change about revenue accounting, provides corroborating evidence for the pressure effect. Robustness checks confirm the validity of our findings and offer further insights into the role of revenue forecasts in revenue manipulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144511094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-22DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100490
Kimberly S. Krieg , John Li
We investigate the relationship between diverse tax planning and a firm’s level of tax risk. Prior studies have suggested that firms face a trade-off between engaging in tax avoidance and managing exposure to tax risk, defined as the volatility of future tax outcomes. We propose that firms may be able to achieve both objectives by diversifying their portfolios of tax avoidance strategies. We create two measures of diversification based on two different ways of measuring tax avoidance. Using these two measures, we find that tax strategy diversification benefits firms in two ways. First, when holding the level of tax avoidance constant, increasing diversification reduces the firm’s exposure to tax risk. Second, when firms increase their level of tax avoidance, having higher diversification mitigates the impact of the increased tax avoidance on their tax risk exposure. Our study highlights the benefits of firms engaging in a diverse portfolio of tax strategies and shows that the relationship between tax avoidance and tax risk is contingent on the firm’s diversification, which may provide an explanation for the mixed evidence found in prior literature.
{"title":"Does diverse tax planning reduce tax risk?","authors":"Kimberly S. Krieg , John Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100490","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100490","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate the relationship between diverse tax planning and a firm’s level of tax risk. Prior studies have suggested that firms face a trade-off between engaging in tax avoidance and managing exposure to tax risk, defined as the volatility of future tax outcomes. We propose that firms may be able to achieve both objectives by diversifying their portfolios of tax avoidance strategies. We create two measures of diversification based on two different ways of measuring tax avoidance. Using these two measures, we find that tax strategy diversification benefits firms in two ways. First, when holding the level of tax avoidance constant, increasing diversification reduces the firm’s exposure to tax risk. Second, when firms increase their level of tax avoidance, having higher diversification mitigates the impact of the increased tax avoidance on their tax risk exposure. Our study highlights the benefits of firms engaging in a diverse portfolio of tax strategies and shows that the relationship between tax avoidance and tax risk is contingent on the firm’s diversification, which may provide an explanation for the mixed evidence found in prior literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144500996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-21DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100486
Raden Roro Widya Ningtyas Soeprajitno, Ainun Na'im, Fuad Rakhman
This study examines the effects of government policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic on management decisions on earnings. While existing studies usually treat a crisis as a single event, in this study, we disentangle the two contrasting forces typically present during a crisis, one increasing and the other decreasing the severity of the crisis. We use the government policy BSG index issued by the University of Oxford COVID-19 Project to identify these types and to measure the extent of the policies issued by governments worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic that affect the uncertainty about the future of business and the economy. Our sample includes public firms from 74 countries, with a total observation of 57,758 firm-years from 2020 to 2022. We find that different policies have different effects on earnings management. Specifically, our results show that containment policies reduce earnings management while economic policies increase earnings management. This study contributes to the literature on how government policies and prolonged economic shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, affect earnings management. We believe that our ability to disentangle the two contrasting forces in a crisis and separately examine their effects on earnings management is the novelty of this study. Our results provide policymakers with insights into the impact of the governments’ policies on management decisions, especially on reported earnings.
{"title":"The effects of government policies during the COVID-19 pandemic on earnings management","authors":"Raden Roro Widya Ningtyas Soeprajitno, Ainun Na'im, Fuad Rakhman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100486","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100486","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the effects of government policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic on management decisions on earnings. While existing studies usually treat a crisis as a single event, in this study, we disentangle the two contrasting forces typically present during a crisis, one increasing and the other decreasing the severity of the crisis. We use the government policy BSG index issued by the University of Oxford COVID-19 Project to identify these types and to measure the extent of the policies issued by governments worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic that affect the uncertainty about the future of business and the economy. Our sample includes public firms from 74 countries, with a total observation of 57,758 firm-years from 2020 to 2022. We find that different policies have different effects on earnings management. Specifically, our results show that containment policies reduce earnings management while economic policies increase earnings management. This study contributes to the literature on how government policies and prolonged economic shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, affect earnings management. We believe that our ability to disentangle the two contrasting forces in a crisis and separately examine their effects on earnings management is the novelty of this study. Our results provide policymakers with insights into the impact of the governments’ policies on management decisions, especially on reported earnings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144556724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}