European Stroke Journal最新文献

Introduction: Developing an effective stroke prevention strategy is crucial for elderly atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with dementia. This is due to the limited and inconsistent evidence available on this topic. In this nationwide, population-based cohort study, we aim to compare the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in AF patients with dementia.

Patients and methods: We identified AF patients with dementia, aged 50 years or older, from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalizations due to ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, or major bleeding, as well as all-cause mortality. We used 1:1 propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazard models to adjust for confounding factors when comparing outcomes between warfarin and DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban) users or warfarin and each individual DOAC.

Results: There were 2952 patients in the DOAC-warfarin matched cohort. The apixaban-, dabigatran-, edoxaban-, and rivaroxaban-warfarin matched cohorts had 2346, 2554, 1684, and 2938 patients, respectively. The DOAC group, when compared to warfarin, was associated with a lower risk of both the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.95) and ischemic stroke (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48-0.87). Apixaban (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94), dabigatran (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.53-0.77), and rivaroxaban (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.97) were also associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome.

Discussion and conclusion: Compared to warfarin, DOACs, whether as a group or apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban individually, were associated with a reduced risk of the composite outcome in elderly patients with concurrent AF and dementia.

Introduction: Managing blood pressure in patients with large vessel occlusion affects infarct size and clinical outcomes. We examined how restoring blood flow impacts systemic blood pressure during mechanical thrombectomy.

Patients and methods: Patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation undergoing mechanical thrombectomy between June 2016 and January 2018 were screened. We included those treated under local anesthesia or conscious sedation and analyzed standardized anesthesia protocols to assess systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels throughout the procedure. The primary outcome was the change of blood pressure, compared 5 min before versus 5 min after the last recanalization attempt. Successful reperfusion was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ⩾ 2b.

Results: Of 134 patients, 117 (87%) achieved successful angiographic reperfusion, showing a notable systolic blood pressure drop 5 min after flow restoration (10.2 ± 14.6 vs 3.24 ± 8.65 mm Hg, p = 0.009). Successful angiographic reperfusion was a significant predictor for this decrease in multivariable logistic regression: OR = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.03-1.73, p = 0.0299). Among 66 patients not given circulation-affecting meds, a significant systolic pressure reduction was also observed (155 ± 17 mm Hg to 148 ± 17 mm Hg ; p < 0.001). No diastolic pressure changes were significant.

Discussion and conclusions: Flow restoration was associated with an immediate reduction of systolic blood pressure values in patients undergoing mechanical recanalization under local anesthesia or conscious sedation. This suggests a complex interplay between endovascular stroke therapy and cardiovascular hemodynamics.

Purpose: We aimed to synthesize the information needs of people with stroke (PwS) in recurrent stroke prevention.

Methods: In this scoping review we searched Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception to June 5, 2023, to identify all studies describing the information needs of people 18 years and older who have suffered a stroke or transient ischemic attack within the past 5 years. We included qualitative and quantitative studies from developed countries published in German or English. Data analysis was performed following Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews.

Findings: We screened 5822 records for eligibility and included 36 articles published between 1993 and 2023. None of the included studies used a comprehensive framework or defined information needs. Based on statements from PwS and their caregivers, PwS needed information on treatment, etiology, effects of stroke, prognosis, rehabilitation, discharge, life changes, care role, support options, information sources, and hospital procedures. The most frequently expressed needs were information on the treatment (77.8%) and stroke etiology (63.9%). The primary information source was healthcare professionals (85.7%), followed by written information (71.4%), family and friends (42.6%), and the internet (35.7%), with information provided directly by healthcare professionals being preferred. The timing of information transfer is often described as too early.

Conclusion: PwS are primarily interested in clinical information about stroke, for example, treatment and etiology, and less often in information about daily life, for example, rehabilitation, the role of care, or lifestyle changes. PwS prefer to receive information directly from healthcare professionals. Developing a shared understanding of PwS's information needs is crucial to implement suitable strategies and programs for dealing with these needs in clinical practice.

Introduction: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and large-vessel occlusion are frequently transferred by emergency physicians (EPs) from primary to comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) for thrombectomy, particular when thrombolysed. Data on complications during such transfers are highly limited.

Patients and methods: Consecutive AIS patients transferred between 01/2015 and 10/2021 to our CSC were included. Associations of major (MACO) and minor (MICO) complications with clinical and imaging data were assessed.

Results: In total, 985 patients were included in the analysis (58.5% thrombolysed). MACO developed in 1.6%, MICO in 14.6%. Compared to patients without complications (NOCO), patients with MACO did not differ in terms of demographics, cerebrovascular risk factors, or site of vessel occlusion. They had more severe strokes (p = 0.026), neurological worsening was more severe (p = 0.008), and transport duration was longer (p = 0.050) but geographical distances did not differ. Thrombolysed patients had any complication more often than patients without thrombolysis (20.3% vs 10.5%; p < 0.001); however, this finding was driven by patients with MICO (p < 0.001) only (MACO: p = 0.804). No associations were observed between stroke severity and complications in either thrombolysed or nonthrombolysed patients. Neurological deterioration during transfer was observed in 21.2%, but multivariate analysis revealed no association with thrombolysis (OR 0.962; 95%CI 0.670-1.380, p = 0.832). Asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was present in 1.1%, symptomatic in 0.1%.

Discussion and conclusion: In this large cohort, no patient-specific factor increasing the risk of complications during interhospital transfer was identified. Specifically, our results do not indicate that thrombolysis increases MACO. Hence, interhospital transfer without EPs appears reasonable in most patients.

Introduction: Thrombectomy complications remain poorly explored. This study aims to characterize periprocedural intracranial vessel perforation including the effect of thrombolysis on patient outcomes.

Patients and methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients with vessel perforation during thrombectomy between January 2015 and April 2023 were included. Vessel perforation was defined as active extravasation on digital subtraction angiography. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Factors associated with the primary outcome were assessed using proportional odds models.

Results: 459 patients with vessel perforation were included (mean age 72.5 ± 13.6 years, 59% female, 41% received thrombolysis). Mortality at 90 days was 51.9% and 16.3% of patients reached mRS 0-2 at 90 days. Thrombolysis was not associated with worse outcome at 90 days. Perforation of a large vessel (LV) as opposed to medium/distal vessel perforation was independently associated with worse outcome at 90 days (aOR 1.709, p = 0.04) and LV perforation was associated with poorer survival probability (HR 1.389, p = 0.021). Patients with active bleeding >20 min had worse survival probability, too (HR 1.797, p = 0.009). Thrombolysis was not associated with longer bleeding duration. Bleeding cessation was achieved faster by permanent vessel occlusion compared to temporary measures (median difference: 4 min, p < 0.001).

Discussion and conclusion: Vessel perforation during thrombectomy is a severe and frequently fatal complication. This study does not suggest that thrombolysis significantly attributes to worse prognosis. Prompt cessation of active bleeding within 20 min is critical, emphasizing the need for interventionalists to be trained in complication management.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) detected after stroke (AFDAS) may represent a distinct clinical entity to that of known AF (KAF). However, there is limited long-term outcome data available for patients with AFDAS. More information regarding prognosis in AFDAS is required to inform future trial design in these patients.

Patients and methods: We used data (2015-2019) from a national prospective stroke registry of consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke and AF. AFDAS was defined as a new diagnosis of AF after stroke detected on electrocardiograph or cardiac monitoring. The co-primary endpoints were: (1) all-cause mortality; (2) recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 3 years. Secondary endpoints were: (1) recurrent stroke; (2) functional outcome at discharge; (3) presence of co-existing stroke mechanisms.

Results: 583 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 2.65 years (cumulative 1064 person-years) 309 patients died and 23 had recurrent MACE. Compared with AFDAS, KAF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 1.56, 95% CI 1.12-2.18), a higher prevalence of co-existing stroke mechanisms (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.28, 95% CI 1.14-4.59), but not poor functional outcome (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 0.98-2.64). A trend towards a higher risk of MACE was observed in patients with KAF, but this was limited by statistical power (aHR 2.90, 95% CI 0.67-12.51). All 14 recurrent strokes occurred in the KAF group (Log-rank p = 0.03).

Discussion and conclusion: These data provide further evidence that AFDAS differs to KAF with respect to risk of recurrent stroke, MACE, and all-cause mortality.

Introduction: Endovascular treatment (EVT) improves outcomes for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) with moderate-to-severe symptoms. However, the best treatment for mild symptoms (NIHSS score 0-10 and 0-5) remains unclear. This study compared EVT ± IVT to IVT alone in BAO patients with mild symptoms.

Patients and methods: From the SITS-International Stroke Treatment Register, we included BAO patients with available baseline NIHSS score, treated by EVT, IVT, or both within 6 h of symptom onset from 2013 to 2021. Using the Doubly Robust approach (propensity score matching plus multivariable logistic regression), we analyzed efficacy (3-month mRS) and safety (SICH and 3-month death) outcomes for EVT ± IVT versus IVT alone in BAO patients with NIHSS scores 0-10 and 0-5.

Results: 1426 patients were included. For NIHSS scores 0-10 (180 matched, 1:1 ratio), outcomes were similar between EVT ± IVT and IVT alone groups. For NIHSS scores 0-5 (89 matched, 1:1 ratio), EVT ± IVT was associated with worse outcomes compared to IVT alone (mRS 0-2, aOR 0.20 [95% CI 0.06-0.61]; p = 0.005; mRS 0-3, aOR 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.89]; p = 0.031), but safety outcomes were similar.

Discussion: In early-treated BAO patients with mild symptoms, defined as NIHSS 0-10, there were no significant differences in outcomes between EVT ± IVT and IVT alone. However, for very mild symptoms, defined as NIHSS 0-5, IVT alone was associated with better outcomes compared to EVT ± IVT.Conclusion: Randomized trials are crucial to determine the optimal reperfusion therapy for BAO patients with mild symptoms.

Introduction: The risk of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with intensive lipid control by statins among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who require direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is unclear. We aimed to determine the risks of ischemic stroke and ICH in AF patients treated with DOAC and statins.

Patients and methods: In a population-based retrospective cohort study, we identified AF patients concurrently on DOAC and statins from 2015 to 2021 in Hong Kong. Primary outcome was ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes were ICH and death. We correlated study outcomes with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as time-varying, continuous variables with restricted cubic spline. In secondary analyses, the risks of study outcomes with statin intensity (low, moderate, high) were determined by multivariable time-dependent marginal structural Cox models.

Results: We identified 32,752 AF patients co-prescribed with DOAC and statins. Lower LDL-C (p < 0.001) and higher HDL-C (p < 0.001) levels were associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke but not significantly associated with ICH. LDL-C of <1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) was not associated with mortality (19.6% vs 18.4%, difference 1.2% [95% CI -0.35 to 2.13]). High-intensity statin was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke compared with low-intensity statin (weighted Cox-specific hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.67-0.99], p = 0.040) independent of LDL-C levels. Similar associations were found in 11,444 AF patients with a history of ischemic stroke.

Discussion and conclusion: Intensive lipid control by high-intensity statins was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke in AF patients who required DOACs and did not appear to increase the risk of ICH.

Background: Existing radiological markers of hematoma expansion (HE) show modest predictive accuracy. We aim to investigate a novel radiological marker that co-localizes findings from non-contrast CT (NCCT) and CT angiography (CTA) to predict HE.

Methods: Consecutive acute intracerebral hemorrhage patients admitted at Foothills Medical Centre in Calgary, Canada, were included. The Black-&-White sign was defined as any visually identified spot sign on CTA co-localized with a hypodensity sign on the corresponding NCCT. The primary outcome was hematoma expansion (⩾6 mL or ⩾33%). Secondary outcomes included absolute (<3, 3-6, 6-12, ⩾12 mL) and relative (0%, <25%, 25%-50%, 50%-75%, or >75%) hematoma growth scales.

Results: Two-hundred patients were included, with 50 (25%) experiencing HE. Forty-four (22%) showed the spot sign, 69 (34.5%) the hypodensity sign, and 14 (7%) co-localized both as the Black-&-White sign. Those with the Black-&-White sign had higher proportions of HE (100% vs 19.4%, p < 0.001), greater absolute hematoma growth (23.37 mL (IQR = 15.41-30.27) vs 0 mL (IQR = 0-2.39), p < 0.001) and relative hematoma growth (120% (IQR = 49-192) vs 0% (0-15%), p < 0.001). The Black-&-White sign had a specificity of 100% (95%CI = 97.6%-100%), a positive predictive value of 100% (95%CI = 76.8%-100%), and an overall accuracy of 82% (95%CI = 76%-87.1%). Among the 14 patients with the Black-&-White sign, 13 showed an absolute hematoma growth ⩾12 mL, and 10 experienced a HE exceeding 75% of the initial volume. The inter-rater agreement was excellent (kappa coefficient = 0.84).

Conclusion: The Black-&-White sign is a robust predictor of hematoma expansion occurrence and severity, yet further validation is needed to confirm these compelling findings.

Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy stands as a pivotal component in the standard care for patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Subsequent care for patients often extends to a neurological intensive care unit. While fluid management is integral to intensive care, the association between early fluid balance and neurological and functional outcomes post-thrombectomy has not yet been thoroughly investigated.

Methods: In a retrospective analysis of an observational, single-center study spanning from 2015 to 2021 at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, we enrolled stroke patients who underwent thrombectomy and received subsequent treatment in the ICU. Unfavorable functional and neurological outcome was defined as a mRS > 2 on day 90 after admission (mRS d90) or NIHSS > 5 at discharge, respectively. A multivariate regression model, adjusting for confounders, utilized the average fluid balance in the first 5 days to predict outcomes. Patients were dichotomized by their average fluid balance (>1 L vs <1 L) within the first 5 days, and a multivariate mRS d90 shift analysis was conducted after adjusting for covariates.

Results: Between 2015 and 2021, 1252 patients underwent thrombectomy, and 553 patients met the inclusion criteria (299 women [54%]). Unfavorable functional outcome was significantly associated with a higher daily average fluid balance in the first 5 days in the ICU (mRS d90 ⩽ 2: 0.3 ± 0.5 L, mRS d90 > 2: 0.7 ± 0.7 L, p = 0.02). The same association was observed for the NIHSS at discharge (NIHSS ⩽ 5: 0.3 ± 0.5 L; NIHSS > 5: 0.6 ± 0.6 L; p = 0.03). The mRS d90 shift analysis revealed significance for patients with an average fluid balance <1 L for better functional outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-3.07; p < 0.01).

Discussion: Fluid retention in post-thrombectomy stroke patients in the ICU is associated with poorer functional and neurological outcomes. Consequently, fluid retention emerges as an additional potential predictor for post-intervention stroke outcomes. Our findings provide an initial indication that preventing excessive fluid retention in stroke patients after endovascular thrombectomy could be beneficial for both functional and neurological recovery. Therefore, fluid retention might be an element to consider in optimizing fluid management for stroke patients.