European Stroke Journal最新文献

Purpose: Demand for stroke services is increasing. To save time and costs, stroke care could be reorganised using a transdisciplinary assessment model embracing overlapping allied health professional skills. The study compares transdisciplinary assessment to discipline-specific allied health assessment on an acute stroke unit, by evaluating assessment time, quality of care, and cost implications.

Method: The pre-/post- clinical study used non-randomised groups and 3-month follow-up after hospital admission. Patients with confirmed/suspected stroke received usual discipline-specific allied health assessment (pre-implementation phase) or the novel transdisciplinary assessment (post-implementation phase). Staff/student assessment times (primary outcome) and medical record data (secondary outcomes) were collected. Time differences were estimated using multivariable linear regression controlling for confounding factors. Cost minimisation and sensitivity analyses estimated change in hospital resource use.

Findings: When the transdisciplinary assessment was used (N = 116), compared to usual assessment (N = 63), the average time saving was 37.6 min (95% CI -47.5, -27.7; p < 0.001) for staff and 62.2 min (95% CI -74.1, -50.3; p < 0.001) for students. The median number of allied health occasions of service reduced from 8 (interquartile range 4-23) to 5 (interquartile range 3-10; p = 0.011). There were no statistically significant or clinically important changes in patient safety, outcomes or stroke guideline adherence. Improved efficiency was associated with an estimated cost saving of $379.45 per patient (probabilistic 95% CI -487.15, -271.48).

Discussion and conclusion: Transdisciplinary stroke assessment has potential for reorganising allied health services to save assessment time and reduce healthcare costs. The transdisciplinary stroke assessment could be considered for implementation in other stroke services.

Rationale: To date, the benefit of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients without advanced neuroimaging selection is confined to within 4.5 h of onset. Our phase II EXIT-BT (Extending the tIme window of Thrombolysis by ButylphThalide up to 6 h after onset) trial suggested the safety, feasibility, and potential benefit of intravenous tenecteplase (TNK) in AIS between 4.5 and 6 h of onset. The EXIT-BT2 trial is a pivotal study undertaken to confirm or refute this signal.

Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of TNK for AIS between 4.5 and 6 h of onset with or without endovascular treatment.

Sample size estimates: A maximum of 1440 patients are required to test the superiority hypothesis with 80% power according to a two-sided 0.05 level of significance, stratified by age, sex, history of diabetes, location of vessel occlusion, baseline National Institute of Health stroke scale score, stroke etiology, and plan for endovascular treatment.

Design: EXIT-BT2 is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded assessment of endpoint (PROBE), and multi-center study. Eligible AIS patients between 4.5 and 6 h of onset are randomly assigned 1:1 into a TNK group or control group. The TNK group will receive TNK (0.25 mg/kg, a single bolus over 5-10 s, maximum 25 mg). The control group will receive standard medical care in compliance with national guidelines for acute ischemic stroke. Both groups will receive standard stroke care from randomization to 90 days after stroke onset according to national guidelines.

Outcome: The primary efficacy endpoint is excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0-1 at 90 days after randomization, while the primary safety endpoint is symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score increase ⩾4 caused by intracranial hemorrhage within 24 (-6/+12) h after randomization.

Conclusions: The results of EXIT-BT2 may determine whether intravenous TNK has a favorable risk/benefit profile in AIS between 4.5 and 6 h of onset.

Rationale: Novel therapeutic approaches are needed in stroke recovery. Whether pharmacological therapies are beneficial for enhancing stroke recovery is unclear. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter involved in motor learning, reward, and brain plasticity. Its prodrug levodopa is a promising agent for stroke recovery.

Aim and hypothesis: To investigate the hypothesis that levodopa, in addition to standardized rehabilitation therapy based on active task training, results in an enhancement of functional recovery in acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients compared to placebo.

Design: ESTREL (Enhancement of Stroke REhabilitation with Levodopa) is a randomized (ratio 1:1), multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group superiority trial.

Participants: 610 participants (according to sample size calculation) with a clinically meaningful hemiparesis will be enrolled ⩽7 days after stroke onset. Key eligibility criteria include (i) in-hospital-rehabilitation required, (ii) capability to participate in rehabilitation, (iii) previous independence in daily living.

Intervention: Levodopa 100 mg/carbidopa 25 mg three times daily, administered for 5 weeks in addition to standardized rehabilitation. The study intervention will be initiated within 7 days after stroke onset.

Comparison: Matching placebo plus standardized rehabilitation.

Outcomes: The primary outcome is the between-group difference of the Fugl-Meyer-Motor Assessment (FMMA) total score measured 3 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported health and wellbeing (PROMIS 10 and 29), patient-reported assessment of improvement, Rivermead Mobility Index, modified Rankin Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and as measures of harm: mortality, recurrent stroke, and serious adverse events.

Conclusion: The ESTREL trial will provide evidence of whether the use of Levodopa in addition to standardized rehabilitation in stroke patients leads to better functional recovery compared to rehabilitation alone.

Background: Thrombus enhancement sign (TES) is associated with cardioembolic stroke and first-pass angiographic failure in anterior ischemic stroke. However, the relationship between TES and stroke subtype and recanalization status after endovascular treatment (EVT) in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains unknown.

Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with acute BAO who underwent EVT between January 2020 and September 2023. Each patient underwent baseline non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography. Two independent readers assessed the presence of TES. Stroke types were classified according to the Trial of ORG 10172 for Acute Stroke Treatment. Successful recanalization was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3 after EVT. Clinical and interventional parameters, along with histopathological thrombi examination results, were compared between the TES-positive and TES-negative groups. The associations between TES and stroke subtype and recanalization status were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: A total of 151 patients were included in the analysis, among whom 116 (77%) exhibited TES. TES showed a significant correlation with cardioembolic and cryptogenic strokes (odds ratio [OR]: 8.56; 95% confidence interval: 3.49-22.4; p < 0.001), whereas the TES-positive thrombi were characterized by a higher fibrin/platelet proportion (p = 0.002) and lower erythrocyte proportion (p = 0.044). The TES-positive group demonstrated favorable outcomes compared to the TES-negative group, including a shorter procedure time (p < 0.001), lower number of thrombectomy attempts (p = 0.010), higher incidence of first pass success (p = 0.022), and lower rate of requiring rescue angioplasty and/or stenting (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, TES remained independently associated with successful recanalization (OR: 9.63; 95% CI: 2.33, 47.7; p = 0.003) after adjusting for baseline confounders.

Conclusions: Visualization of TES serves as a reliable and easily accessible marker for identifying cardioembolic and cryptogenic strokes and predicting recanalization success in thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion.

Introduction: More than 50% of large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) remain severely disabled at 3 months. We hypothesized that acute astrocytic inflammatory response may play a pivotal role in post-AIS brain changes associated with poor functional outcome. We proposed to evaluate the level of YKL-40, a glycoprotein mainly released by reactive astrocytes.

Patients and methods: A monocentric prospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive LVO AIS patients treated with EVT. Three blood samples (before, within 1 and 24-hour post-EVT) were collected to measure plasma YKL-40 concentrations. Functional outcome was assessed according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months.

Results: Between 2016 and 2020, 120 patients were included. The plasma concentration of YKL-40 before EVT was statistically and independently associated with 3-month worse functional outcome (adjusted cOR, 1.59; 95% CI [1.05-2.44], p = 0.027) but not the two following samples 1-hour and 24-hour post-EVT. Accordingly, we found that excellent functional outcome was associated with a lower level of YKL-40 before and within 1 h after EVT (p = 0.005 and p = 0.003, respectively) but not when measured 24 h after EVT (p = 0.2).

Discussion and conclusion: This study suggests that the astrocytic reaction to acute brain hypoxia, especially before recanalization, is associated with worse functional outcome. Such early biomarker of the astrocytic response in AIS may optimize individualized care in the future.

Clinical trial registration-url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02900833.

Introduction: In intracranial medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) shows inconsistent effectiveness and endovascular interventions remains unproven. We evaluated a new therapeutic strategy based on a second IVT using tenecteplase for MeVOs without early recanalization post-alteplase.

Patients and methods: This retrospective, comparative study included consecutively low bleeding risk MeVO patients treated with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg at two stroke centers. One center used a conventional single-IVT approach; the other applied a dual-IVT strategy, incorporating a 1-h post-alteplase MRI and additional tenecteplase, 0.25 mg/kg, if occlusion persisted. Primary outcomes were 24-h successful recanalization for efficacy and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) for safety. Secondary outcomes included 3-month excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1). Comparisons were conducted in the overall cohort and a propensity score-matched subgroup.

Results: Among 146 patients in the dual-IVT group, 103 failed to achieve recanalization at 1 h and of these 96 met all eligible criteria and received additional tenecteplase. Successful recanalization at 24 h was higher in the 146 dual-IVT cohort patients than in the 148 single-IVT cohort patients (84% vs 61%, p < 0.0001), with similar sICH rate (3 vs 2, p = 0.68). Dual-IVT strategy was an independent predictor of 24-h successful recanalization (OR, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.52-4.88]; p < 0.001). Dual-IVT cohort patients achieved higher rates of excellent outcome (69% vs 44%, p < 0.0001). Propensity score matching analyses supported all these associations.

Conclusion: In this retrospective study, a dual-IVT strategy in selected MeVO patients was associated with higher odds of 24-h recanalization, with no safety concerns. However, potential center-level confounding and biases seriously limit these findings' interpretation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05809921.

Introduction: Little is known about the implications of multivessel occlusions (MVO) in large vessel occlusion stroke patients who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT).

Patients and methods: We report data from the MR CLEAN Registry: a prospective, observational study on all stroke patients who underwent EVT in the Netherlands (March 2014-November 2017). We included patients with an intracranial target occlusion in the anterior circulation. An MVO was defined as an MCA occlusion (M1/M2) or intracranial ICA/ICA-T occlusion, with a concurrent second occlusion in the ACA or PCA territory confirmed on baseline CTA. To compare outcomes, we performed a 10:1 propensity score matching analysis with a logistic regression model including potential confounders. Outcome measures included 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) and mortality.

Results: Of 2946 included patients, 71 patients (2.4%) had an MVO (87% concurrent ACA occlusion, 10% PCA occlusion, 3% ⩾3 occlusions). These patients were matched to 71 non-MVO patients. Before matching, MVO patients had a higher baseline NIHSS (median 18 vs 16, p = 0.001) and worse collateral status (absent collaterals: 17% vs 6%, p < 0.001) compared to non-MVO patients. After matching, MVO patients had worse functional outcome at 90 days (median mRS 5 vs 3, cOR 0.39; 95%CI 0.25-0.62). Mortality was higher in MVO patients (46% vs 27%, OR 2.11, 95%CI 1.24-3.57).

Discussion and conclusion: MVOs on baseline imaging were uncommon in LVO stroke patients undergoing EVT, but were associated with poor functional outcome.

Purpose: Stroke treatments are time-sensitive, and thus early and correct recognition of stroke by Emergency Medical Services is essential for outcomes. This is particularly important with the adaption of mobile stroke units. In this systematic review, we therefore aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of Emergency Medical Services dispatcher recognition of stroke.

Methods: The review was registered on PROSPERO and the PRISMA guidelines were applied. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Review Library. Screening and data extraction were performed by two observers. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 instrument.

Findings: Of 1200 papers screened, 24 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Data on sensitivity was reported in 22 papers and varied from 17.9% to 83.0%. Positive predictive values were reported in 12 papers and ranged from 24.0% to 87.7%. Seven papers reported specificity, which ranged from 20.0% to 99.1%. Six papers reported negative predictive value, ranging from 28.0% to 99.4%. In general, the risk of bias was low.

Discussion: Stroke recognition by dispatchers varied greatly, but overall many patients with stroke are not recognised, despite the initiatives taken to improve stroke literacy. The available data are of high quality, however Asian, African, and South American populations are underrepresented.

Conclusion: While the data are heterogenous, this review can serve as a reference for future research in emergency medical dispatcher stroke recognition and initiatives to improve prehospital stroke recognition.

Introduction: Covert brain infarcts (CBI) are frequent incidental findings on MRI and associated with future stroke risk in patients without a history of clinically evident cerebrovascular events. However, the prognostic value of CBI in first-ever ischemic stroke patients is unclear and previous studies did not report on different etiological stroke subtypes. We aimed to test CBI phenotypes and their association with stroke recurrence in first-ever ischemic stroke patients according to stroke etiology.

Patients and methods: This study is a pooled data analysis of two prospectively collected cohorts of consecutive first-ever ischemic stroke patients admitted to the comprehensive stroke centers of Bern (Switzerland) and Graz (Austria). CBI phenotypes were identified on brain MRI within 72 h after admission. All patients underwent a routine follow-up (median: 12 months) to identify stroke recurrence.

Results: Of 1577 consecutive ischemic stroke patients (median age: 71 years), 691 patients showed CBI on brain MRI (44%) and 88 patients had a recurrent ischemic stroke (6%). Baseline CBI were associated with stroke recurrence in multivariable analysis (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.3). CBI phenotypes with the highest risk for stroke recurrence were cavitatory CBI in small vessel disease (SVD)-related stroke (HR 7.1, 95% CI 1.6-12.6) and cortical CBI in patients with atrial fibrillation (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.1).

Discussion and conclusion: This study reports a ≈ 2-fold increased risk for stroke recurrence in first-ever ischemic stroke patients with CBI. The risk of recurrent stroke was highest in patients with cavitatory CBI in SVD-related stroke and cortical CBI in patients with atrial fibrillation.Subject terms: Covert brain infarcts, stroke.

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO), but its efficacy and safety in medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) remain less explored. This multicenter, retrospective study aims to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of vessel perforations (confirmed by extravasation during an angiographic series) during MT for AIS caused by MeVO.

Methods: Data were collected from 37 academic centers across North America, Asia, and Europe between September 2017 and July 2021. A total of 1373 AIS patients with MeVO underwent MT. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results: The incidence of vessel perforation was 4.8% (66/1373). Notably, our analysis indicates variations in perforation rates across different arterial segments: 8.9% in M3 segments, 4.3% in M2 segments, and 8.3% in A2 segments (p = 0.612). Patients with perforation had significantly worse outcomes, with lower rates of favorable angiographic outcomes (TICI 2c-3: 23% vs 58.9%, p < 0.001; TICI 2b-3: 56.5% vs 88.3%, p < 0.001). Functional outcomes were also worse in the perforation group (mRS 0-1 at 3 months: 22.7% vs 36.6%, p = 0.031; mRS 0-2 at 3 months: 28.8% vs 53.9%, p < 0.001). Mortality was higher in the perforation group (30.3% vs 16.8%, p = 0.008).

Conclusion: This study reveals that while the occurrence of vessel perforation in MT for AIS due to MeVO is relatively rare, it is associated with poor functional outcomes and higher mortality. The findings highlight the need for increased caution and specialized training in performing MT for MeVO. Further prospective research is required for risk mitigation strategies.