Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-06DOI: 10.1177/17446295241259913
Laurie Lucassen, Romina Rinaldi, Elise Batsele
Disparities in healthcare are observed among people with intellectual disabilities. They generally face stigmatisation and negative attitudes from healthcare professionals. The aim of this study is to investigate the link of diagnostic label and social distance on inclusive health representations and practices towards people with intellectual disabilities among healthcare professionals. We conducted an online survey of 163 healthcare professionals living in French-speaking Belgium. The results highlighted that the diagnostic label and a lower social distance predict better representations and practices in inclusive health. In addition, an analysis of mediation showed the mediating effect of social distance on the link between being in contact with people with intellectual disabilities (through employment) and better representations and practices in inclusive health. This study enabled us to assess the interplay between stigma variables and healthcare professionals' representations and practices towards people with intellectual disabilities and to identify potential facilitators for promoting health equity.
{"title":"Interplay between representations, practices, and stigma variables towards people with intellectual disabilities among healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Laurie Lucassen, Romina Rinaldi, Elise Batsele","doi":"10.1177/17446295241259913","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17446295241259913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disparities in healthcare are observed among people with intellectual disabilities. They generally face stigmatisation and negative attitudes from healthcare professionals. The aim of this study is to investigate the link of diagnostic label and social distance on inclusive health representations and practices towards people with intellectual disabilities among healthcare professionals. We conducted an online survey of 163 healthcare professionals living in French-speaking Belgium. The results highlighted that the diagnostic label and a lower social distance predict better representations and practices in inclusive health. In addition, an analysis of mediation showed the mediating effect of social distance on the link between being in contact with people with intellectual disabilities (through employment) and better representations and practices in inclusive health. This study enabled us to assess the interplay between stigma variables and healthcare professionals' representations and practices towards people with intellectual disabilities and to identify potential facilitators for promoting health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"574-589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141262175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2024-01-23DOI: 10.1177/17446295241229002
Femke Scheffers, Xavier Moonen, Eveline van Vugt
People with intellectual disabilities are often excluded from participation in research, whilst research has the potential to enhance positive change in their lives. In the current study, using a guided photovoice procedure, the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities regarding participation in research are evaluated. A total of 14 participants with intellectual disabilities were interviewed using guided photovoice. Through thematical analyses the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities regarding photovoice are discussed. Benefits were taking time, visual cues and the opportunity to speak out. Challenges were abstract concepts and aftercare. Guided photovoice helps to better understand the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities and thus can help to improve their quality of life. People with intellectual disabilities were interested in taking part in the current research project and experienced participating as a positive experience. However careful planning and expertise in communication with people with intellectual disabilities is necessary to include people with intellectual disabilities in research.
{"title":"Photographic visualization of stories: documenting the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities with guided photovoice.","authors":"Femke Scheffers, Xavier Moonen, Eveline van Vugt","doi":"10.1177/17446295241229002","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17446295241229002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with intellectual disabilities are often excluded from participation in research, whilst research has the potential to enhance positive change in their lives. In the current study, using a guided photovoice procedure, the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities regarding participation in research are evaluated. A total of 14 participants with intellectual disabilities were interviewed using guided photovoice. Through thematical analyses the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities regarding photovoice are discussed. Benefits were taking time, visual cues and the opportunity to speak out. Challenges were abstract concepts and aftercare. Guided photovoice helps to better understand the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities and thus can help to improve their quality of life. People with intellectual disabilities were interested in taking part in the current research project and experienced participating as a positive experience. However careful planning and expertise in communication with people with intellectual disabilities is necessary to include people with intellectual disabilities in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"539-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139542504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2023-12-27DOI: 10.1177/17446295231225272
Diana K Piantedosi, Amie O'Shea
The design of intellectual disability research warrants critical examination, as the knowledge produced through these approaches informs evidence-based practices. People with lived experience should be recognised as experts in understanding their own bodies, conditions, and treatment. This systematic review examined the design of Delphi studies to assess the extent to which people with intellectual disability are included as experts. The Delphi method, which gathers structured feedback from experts, offers insight into how lived experience is valued as a source of knowledge. Across fifty-five publications reporting on forty-nine separate Delphi studies that met our inclusion criteria, only nine involved people with intellectual disability directly. In contrast, family and informal caregivers were more frequently represented as experts, and their perspectives carried greater influence. The findings of this review include guidance for practitioners and researchers to facilitate greater participatory roles of people with intellectual disability.
{"title":"The role of people with intellectual disability in intellectual disability research: A systematic review of Delphi studies.","authors":"Diana K Piantedosi, Amie O'Shea","doi":"10.1177/17446295231225272","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17446295231225272","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The design of intellectual disability research warrants critical examination, as the knowledge produced through these approaches informs evidence-based practices. People with lived experience should be recognised as experts in understanding their own bodies, conditions, and treatment. This systematic review examined the design of Delphi studies to assess the extent to which people with intellectual disability are included as experts. The Delphi method, which gathers structured feedback from experts, offers insight into how lived experience is valued as a source of knowledge. Across fifty-five publications reporting on forty-nine separate Delphi studies that met our inclusion criteria, only nine involved people with intellectual disability directly. In contrast, family and informal caregivers were more frequently represented as experts, and their perspectives carried greater influence. The findings of this review include guidance for practitioners and researchers to facilitate greater participatory roles of people with intellectual disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"727-742"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139049533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-24DOI: 10.1177/17446295241277920
Natalie M Driscoll, Peter F Gerhardt, Mary Jane Weiss, Lisa M Tereshko, Mark R Dixon, Ellie Kazemi, David J Cox
Safety is a significant clinical challenge in settings serving adults with developmental disabilities. Few resources exist to guide clinical teams in this realm; this study explored safety elements through interviews with experts in critical areas of safety management. The present study aimed to gather knowledge and insights regarding assessing risk among individuals with disabilities. Due to gaps in the available safety literature in adult services, interviews in related areas were conducted and analyzed for thematic content. This paper focuses on the extracted safety themes' categorization, summarization, and implications. The safety themes extracted from the interviews included environmental arrangements, medical, independent living skills, historical indicators of risk, family life skills, challenging behavior, and communication. The interviews identified areas of concern that might guide assessment and inform providers about the most individually relevant contexts to consider when supporting clients.
{"title":"A qualitative analysis of expert interviews on safety and risk.","authors":"Natalie M Driscoll, Peter F Gerhardt, Mary Jane Weiss, Lisa M Tereshko, Mark R Dixon, Ellie Kazemi, David J Cox","doi":"10.1177/17446295241277920","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17446295241277920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safety is a significant clinical challenge in settings serving adults with developmental disabilities. Few resources exist to guide clinical teams in this realm; this study explored safety elements through interviews with experts in critical areas of safety management. The present study aimed to gather knowledge and insights regarding assessing risk among individuals with disabilities. Due to gaps in the available safety literature in adult services, interviews in related areas were conducted and analyzed for thematic content. This paper focuses on the extracted safety themes' categorization, summarization, and implications. The safety themes extracted from the interviews included environmental arrangements, medical, independent living skills, historical indicators of risk, family life skills, challenging behavior, and communication. The interviews identified areas of concern that might guide assessment and inform providers about the most individually relevant contexts to consider when supporting clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"590-606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1177/17446295251369599
Abisoye Sotonwa, Richard Meiser-Stedman, Corrina Willmoth
Whilst existing literature describes the experience of transitioning in mainstream mental health services, little is known about specialist learning disability services. The following study aimed to explore how parents of young adults, aged 17 to 21, with intellectual disability make sense of their experiences of transitioning from learning disability Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) to adult community learning disability teams. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four parents of individuals diagnosed with a learning disability who were receiving care in the adult community learning disability team. Transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Three group experiential themes emerged: impact of transition on sense of control, making sense of challenges experienced, and wishing for a better service. The findings highlighted experiences of parents transitioning both through specialist health and social care services. Future research should seek to understand the impact of race on transition and experience of service.
{"title":"How parents of young adults with intellectual disability make sense of their experiences of transitioning from learning disability CAMHS to learning disability adult health service: An IPA study.","authors":"Abisoye Sotonwa, Richard Meiser-Stedman, Corrina Willmoth","doi":"10.1177/17446295251369599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251369599","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whilst existing literature describes the experience of transitioning in mainstream mental health services, little is known about specialist learning disability services. The following study aimed to explore how parents of young adults, aged 17 to 21, with intellectual disability make sense of their experiences of transitioning from learning disability Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) to adult community learning disability teams. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four parents of individuals diagnosed with a learning disability who were receiving care in the adult community learning disability team. Transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Three group experiential themes emerged: impact of transition on sense of control, making sense of challenges experienced, and wishing for a better service. The findings highlighted experiences of parents transitioning both through specialist health and social care services. Future research should seek to understand the impact of race on transition and experience of service.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251369599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1177/17446295251367687
Andrea Bruun, Amanda Cresswell, David Jeffrey, Leon Jordan, Richard Keagan-Bull, Jo Giles, Faye Gardiner, Meg Wilding, Nicola Payne, Sarah Swindells, Sarah L Gibson, Rebecca Anderson-Kittow, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne
This study used qualitative surveys and focus groups to evaluate the implementation of an end-of-life care planning toolkit within intellectual disability social care services, by exploring whether it is beneficial and workable in this setting. Participants were staff trialling the toolkit and submitting feedback forms. Focus groups with support staff and service managers were also conducted. Feedback forms and focus group transcripts were coded using a modified framework approach. Data and analyses were discussed within the team (including researchers with intellectual disabilities). Thirty-four participants submitted 44 feedback forms. Two focus groups with seven participants were held. Participants found the toolkit approach and resources acceptable and appropriate, prompting positive eye-opening conversations. There were significant adoption and feasibility implementation challenges such as printing the resources, lack of time, and the sensitive end-of-life topic. Exploration of how to overcome these challenges is needed to successfully implement the toolkit in social care services.
{"title":"Evaluating a toolkit for end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities: An exploration of implementation outcomes within intellectual disability social care services.","authors":"Andrea Bruun, Amanda Cresswell, David Jeffrey, Leon Jordan, Richard Keagan-Bull, Jo Giles, Faye Gardiner, Meg Wilding, Nicola Payne, Sarah Swindells, Sarah L Gibson, Rebecca Anderson-Kittow, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne","doi":"10.1177/17446295251367687","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251367687","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study used qualitative surveys and focus groups to evaluate the implementation of an end-of-life care planning toolkit within intellectual disability social care services, by exploring whether it is beneficial and workable in this setting. Participants were staff trialling the toolkit and submitting feedback forms. Focus groups with support staff and service managers were also conducted. Feedback forms and focus group transcripts were coded using a modified framework approach. Data and analyses were discussed within the team (including researchers with intellectual disabilities). Thirty-four participants submitted 44 feedback forms. Two focus groups with seven participants were held. Participants found the toolkit approach and resources acceptable and appropriate, prompting positive eye-opening conversations. There were significant adoption and feasibility implementation challenges such as printing the resources, lack of time, and the sensitive end-of-life topic. Exploration of how to overcome these challenges is needed to successfully implement the toolkit in social care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251367687"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1177/17446295251367682
Karin Nilsson, Gunilla Thunberg, Emil Holmer, Jenny Samuelsson, Mikael Heimann, Monica Reichenberg, Lisa Palmqvist
Learning to read can be challenging for students with intellectual disability, but studies on reading interventions for this population show that it is possible when utilising evidence-based instructional methods. This study investigated how teachers in Swedish compulsory schools for students with intellectual disability described the content of their reading instruction. An abductive thematic analysis of 13 teachers' logbooks revealed difficulties in balancing the required focus on knowledge acquisition while simultaneously making reading instruction accessible and motivating for students. These findings underscore the importance of guiding teachers in aligning individual adaptations, particularly those motivated by student interests, with evidence-based practices in reading instruction. This alignment is crucial to ensure that students receive instruction that engages them and effectively supports their reading development.
{"title":"Balancing accessible teaching and knowledge acquisition: How teachers describe their reading instruction for students with intellectual disability.","authors":"Karin Nilsson, Gunilla Thunberg, Emil Holmer, Jenny Samuelsson, Mikael Heimann, Monica Reichenberg, Lisa Palmqvist","doi":"10.1177/17446295251367682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251367682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning to read can be challenging for students with intellectual disability, but studies on reading interventions for this population show that it is possible when utilising evidence-based instructional methods. This study investigated how teachers in Swedish compulsory schools for students with intellectual disability described the content of their reading instruction. An abductive thematic analysis of 13 teachers' logbooks revealed difficulties in balancing the required focus on knowledge acquisition while simultaneously making reading instruction accessible and motivating for students. These findings underscore the importance of guiding teachers in aligning individual adaptations, particularly those motivated by student interests, with evidence-based practices in reading instruction. This alignment is crucial to ensure that students receive instruction that engages them and effectively supports their reading development.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251367682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-27DOI: 10.1177/17446295251362348
Caitlin Norris-Grey, Aileen Carmen
Aims: Challenging behaviour in individuals with intellectual disabilities affects quality of life and often results in antipsychotic use, despite guidelines recommending non-drug approaches as the first line. This study explores healthcare team perspectives on managing challenging behaviour, barriers to reducing antipsychotic overprescription, and possible solutions. Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study using thematic analysis of an online team discussion and survey. Findings were used to develop a driver diagram of proposed strategies. Results: Three themes were identified: (1) varied views on current prescribing practices, with concerns about overuse and limited awareness of guidance; (2) key barriers including staffing shortages, reluctance to reduce medication, poor communication, lack of structured reviews, and absence of outcome measures; and (3) proposed solutions such as family involvement, regular reviews, improved outcome tracking, staff education, and clear care pathways. Conclusion: Addressing system-level barriers through coordinated team-based approaches may reduce reliance on antipsychotics and improve care.
{"title":"\"I would prefer to be prescribing less\": Perceptions on antipsychotics and challenging behaviour.","authors":"Caitlin Norris-Grey, Aileen Carmen","doi":"10.1177/17446295251362348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251362348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims:</b> Challenging behaviour in individuals with intellectual disabilities affects quality of life and often results in antipsychotic use, despite guidelines recommending non-drug approaches as the first line. This study explores healthcare team perspectives on managing challenging behaviour, barriers to reducing antipsychotic overprescription, and possible solutions. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional qualitative study using thematic analysis of an online team discussion and survey. Findings were used to develop a driver diagram of proposed strategies. <b>Results:</b> Three themes were identified: (1) varied views on current prescribing practices, with concerns about overuse and limited awareness of guidance; (2) key barriers including staffing shortages, reluctance to reduce medication, poor communication, lack of structured reviews, and absence of outcome measures; and (3) proposed solutions such as family involvement, regular reviews, improved outcome tracking, staff education, and clear care pathways. <b>Conclusion:</b> Addressing system-level barriers through coordinated team-based approaches may reduce reliance on antipsychotics and improve care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251362348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144733923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-06DOI: 10.1177/17446295251357672
Romina Rinaldi, Elise Batselé, Lautaro Diaz, Markus Kosel, Vincent Guinchat, Louis Nahum, Joséphine Convertini
Background: Emotional development in individuals with intellectual disabilities follows distinct trajectories; however, few psychometrically-sound tools target this dimension. Aims: This study examined the psychometric properties of the French version of the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) in youth and adults with intellectual disabilities. Methods: A multicentre cohort of 170 participants with mild-to-profound intellectual disabilities was assessed. Internal consistency (McDonald's ω) and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) were evaluated. Construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Associations with intellectual disabilities severity, adaptive functioning, and age were explored using correlations and nonparametric tests. Results: The SED-S demonstrated high internal consistency (ω = 0.933) and strong inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.851). A one-factor model supported construct validity. SED-S scores were significantly related to intellectual disability severity and autism spectrum disorder diagnosis but not age. Conclusion: The French SED-S is a reliable and valid tool for assessing emotional development in French-speaking individuals with intellectual disabilities.
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the French version of the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) in a multicentre cohort of youth and adults with intellectual disabilities.","authors":"Romina Rinaldi, Elise Batselé, Lautaro Diaz, Markus Kosel, Vincent Guinchat, Louis Nahum, Joséphine Convertini","doi":"10.1177/17446295251357672","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17446295251357672","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Emotional development in individuals with intellectual disabilities follows distinct trajectories; however, few psychometrically-sound tools target this dimension. <b>Aims:</b> This study examined the psychometric properties of the French version of the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) in youth and adults with intellectual disabilities. <b>Methods:</b> A multicentre cohort of 170 participants with mild-to-profound intellectual disabilities was assessed. Internal consistency (McDonald's ω) and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) were evaluated. Construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Associations with intellectual disabilities severity, adaptive functioning, and age were explored using correlations and nonparametric tests. <b>Results:</b> The SED-S demonstrated high internal consistency (ω = 0.933) and strong inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.851). A one-factor model supported construct validity. SED-S scores were significantly related to intellectual disability severity and autism spectrum disorder diagnosis but not age. <b>Conclusion:</b> The French SED-S is a reliable and valid tool for assessing emotional development in French-speaking individuals with intellectual disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251357672"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144576651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-05DOI: 10.1177/17446295251351508
Godwin Denk Giebel, Pascal Raszke, Milena Weitzel, Jürgen Wasem, Elisabeth Wlasich, Olivia Wagemann, Georg Nübling, Johannes Levin, Arthur Schall, Valentina Tesky, Johannes Pantel, Anke Walendzik, Theresa Hüer
Introduction: People with Down syndrome (PwDS) have a substantially increased risk of developing Alzheimer's dementia. This can lead to challenges in medical care. To identify these challenges, a scoping review was conducted. Methods: The search consisted of a systematic database search and a structured search on relevant institutional websites. After inclusion, articles were reviewed for deficits and barriers in health care provision for PwDS and dementia. Results were discussed and systematized in a workshop. Results: Of 3,679 articles identified, 23 were included by systematic search and two by structured search. Finally, results were systematized in two dimensions: (1) Medical areas where problems occurred (diagnostics, therapy, research, and overarching issues) and (2) Stakeholders affected (patients, caregivers, and medical or other service providers). Conclusions: Since multiple deficits and barriers were identified in the medical care for PwDS and dementia, it is crucial to improve healthcare provision for this vulnerable group.
{"title":"Deficits and barriers in medical care of people with down syndrome and dementia: A scoping review.","authors":"Godwin Denk Giebel, Pascal Raszke, Milena Weitzel, Jürgen Wasem, Elisabeth Wlasich, Olivia Wagemann, Georg Nübling, Johannes Levin, Arthur Schall, Valentina Tesky, Johannes Pantel, Anke Walendzik, Theresa Hüer","doi":"10.1177/17446295251351508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251351508","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> People with Down syndrome (PwDS) have a substantially increased risk of developing Alzheimer's dementia. This can lead to challenges in medical care. To identify these challenges, a scoping review was conducted. <b>Methods:</b> The search consisted of a systematic database search and a structured search on relevant institutional websites. After inclusion, articles were reviewed for deficits and barriers in health care provision for PwDS and dementia. Results were discussed and systematized in a workshop. <b>Results:</b> Of 3,679 articles identified, 23 were included by systematic search and two by structured search. Finally, results were systematized in two dimensions: (1) Medical areas where problems occurred (diagnostics, therapy, research, and overarching issues) and (2) Stakeholders affected (patients, caregivers, and medical or other service providers). <b>Conclusions:</b> Since multiple deficits and barriers were identified in the medical care for PwDS and dementia, it is crucial to improve healthcare provision for this vulnerable group.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251351508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144567980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}