Pub Date : 2024-08-14DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00545-z
Kyung-Bok Son
Background: Introducing more generics has been a successful strategy for lowering pharmaceutical prices and expenditure. However, the effect of the strategy depends on the pricing schemes for generics. We aimed to update the South Korean generic markets in terms of effective competition, and to examine the effects of number of manufacturers and price variance on pharmaceutical expenditure.
Methods: We constructed balanced panel data provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service covering 726 reimbursed substances from 2019 to 2023. We developed original indicators to analyze the generic markets: the maximum-minimum price variance (MMPV) and the maximum-weighted price variance (MWPV). Panel regression with fixed and time-fixed effects was used.
Results: Over the study period, the number of manufacturers increased from 17.81 in 2019 to 20.98 in 2020 and then decreased to 18.70 in 2023. The MMPV increased from 204.70 in 2019 to 230.07 in 2022 and then decreased slightly to 225.34 in 2023. The MWPV increased from 59.70 in 2019 to 72.58 in 2023. Two types of segmented markets were noteworthy: low use of low-cost generics with sufficient manufacturers and high use of low-cost generics with insufficient manufacturers. In the fixed and time-fixed effects panel analyses, the MWPV presented a negative association with the number of manufacturers and a positive association with the MMPV.
Conclusions: A newly introduced tiered pricing scheme, designed to differentiate generic prices, was associated with a decrease in the number of manufacturers and an increase in price dispersion. The pricing schemes for generics should be designed with price variance in mind and limit the number of too many generics in South Korea.
{"title":"Which factor reduces pharmaceutical expenditure, number of entrants or price variance? Updated generic drug markets in South Korea.","authors":"Kyung-Bok Son","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00545-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00545-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Introducing more generics has been a successful strategy for lowering pharmaceutical prices and expenditure. However, the effect of the strategy depends on the pricing schemes for generics. We aimed to update the South Korean generic markets in terms of effective competition, and to examine the effects of number of manufacturers and price variance on pharmaceutical expenditure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed balanced panel data provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service covering 726 reimbursed substances from 2019 to 2023. We developed original indicators to analyze the generic markets: the maximum-minimum price variance (MMPV) and the maximum-weighted price variance (MWPV). Panel regression with fixed and time-fixed effects was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, the number of manufacturers increased from 17.81 in 2019 to 20.98 in 2020 and then decreased to 18.70 in 2023. The MMPV increased from 204.70 in 2019 to 230.07 in 2022 and then decreased slightly to 225.34 in 2023. The MWPV increased from 59.70 in 2019 to 72.58 in 2023. Two types of segmented markets were noteworthy: low use of low-cost generics with sufficient manufacturers and high use of low-cost generics with insufficient manufacturers. In the fixed and time-fixed effects panel analyses, the MWPV presented a negative association with the number of manufacturers and a positive association with the MMPV.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A newly introduced tiered pricing scheme, designed to differentiate generic prices, was associated with a decrease in the number of manufacturers and an increase in price dispersion. The pricing schemes for generics should be designed with price variance in mind and limit the number of too many generics in South Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323484/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141976873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00543-1
Aurelian-Petruş Plopeanu
Background: In this paper, we estimate the long-lasting influence of the former Habsburg Empire's border on the territory of Romania, specifically on the prevalence of corrupt behaviour and practices in health services.
Methods: Employing microdata from the 2016 Life in Transition Survey and applying ordered probit regression, we explore the hypothesis that the geographical proximity of respondents' residences to the former imperial border-restricting the analysis within a bandwidth of 50 km, 75 km or even 100 km on either side - significantly influences current individual tendencies towards corrupt behaviour.
Results: The results indicate that individuals in Transylvania living in the immediate vicinity of the former border of the Habsburg Empire (no more than 75 km away) show a higher propensity towards corrupt behaviours, similar to those from Moldova and Wallachia who reside in the same bandwidth but to the east of the former historical border. Interestingly, on one hand, after a series of tests with various relevant factors, the contagion effect is observed from right to left, meaning from those in Moldova and Wallachia towards those in Transylvania, and not the other way around as might be expected based on other previous studies. On the other hand, individuals living more than 75 kms west of the former historical border show clear reluctance to engage in informal payments and gift-giving when interacting with the public health system as patients.
Conclusion: By rigorously controlling for various variables that comprehensively show different legacies of the communist regime, our results confirm the persistence of these influences across different bandwidths, thereby corroborating the hypothesis of path dependence influenced by the former Habsburg Empire.
{"title":"Historical origins of corruption in the Romanian public health system - path dependency and contagion effect.","authors":"Aurelian-Petruş Plopeanu","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00543-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00543-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this paper, we estimate the long-lasting influence of the former Habsburg Empire's border on the territory of Romania, specifically on the prevalence of corrupt behaviour and practices in health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing microdata from the 2016 Life in Transition Survey and applying ordered probit regression, we explore the hypothesis that the geographical proximity of respondents' residences to the former imperial border-restricting the analysis within a bandwidth of 50 km, 75 km or even 100 km on either side - significantly influences current individual tendencies towards corrupt behaviour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that individuals in Transylvania living in the immediate vicinity of the former border of the Habsburg Empire (no more than 75 km away) show a higher propensity towards corrupt behaviours, similar to those from Moldova and Wallachia who reside in the same bandwidth but to the east of the former historical border. Interestingly, on one hand, after a series of tests with various relevant factors, the contagion effect is observed from right to left, meaning from those in Moldova and Wallachia towards those in Transylvania, and not the other way around as might be expected based on other previous studies. On the other hand, individuals living more than 75 kms west of the former historical border show clear reluctance to engage in informal payments and gift-giving when interacting with the public health system as patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By rigorously controlling for various variables that comprehensively show different legacies of the communist regime, our results confirm the persistence of these influences across different bandwidths, thereby corroborating the hypothesis of path dependence influenced by the former Habsburg Empire.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308148/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-06DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00539-x
Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Nayê Balzan Schneider, Erica Caetano Roos, Miriam Allein Zago Marcolino, Margareth Castro Ozelo, Mariana Midori Takahashi Hosokawa Nikkuni, Luany Elvira Mesquita Carvalho, Tatyane Oliveira Rebouças, Monica Hermida Cerqueira, Veronica Mata, Carisi Anne Polanczyk
Background: Patients with Hemophilia are continually monitored at treatment centers to avoid and control bleeding episodes. This study estimated the direct and indirect costs per patient with hemophilia A in Brazil and evaluated the cost variability across different age groups.
Methods: A prospective observational research was conducted with retrospective data collection of patients assisted at three referral blood centers in Brazil. Time-driven Activity-based Costing method was used to analyze direct costs, while indirect costs were estimated based on interviews with family and caregivers. Cost per patient was analyzed according to age categories, stratified into 3 groups (0-11;12-18 or older than 19 years old). The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to confirm the differences in costs across groups.
Results: Data from 140 hemophilia A patients were analyzed; 53 were 0-11 years, 29 were 12-18 years, and the remaining were older than 19 years. The median cost per patient per year was R$450,831 (IQR R$219,842; R$785,149; $174,566), being possible to confirm age as a cost driver: older patients had higher costs than younger's (p = 0.001; median cost: 0-11 yrs R$299,320; 12-18 yrs R$521,936; ≥19 yrs R$718,969).
Conclusion: This study is innovative in providing cost information for hemophilia A using a microcosting technique. The variation in costs across patient age groups can sustain more accurate health policies driven to increase access to cutting-edge technologies and reduce the burden of the disease.
{"title":"Cost of hemophilia A in Brazil: a microcosting study.","authors":"Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Nayê Balzan Schneider, Erica Caetano Roos, Miriam Allein Zago Marcolino, Margareth Castro Ozelo, Mariana Midori Takahashi Hosokawa Nikkuni, Luany Elvira Mesquita Carvalho, Tatyane Oliveira Rebouças, Monica Hermida Cerqueira, Veronica Mata, Carisi Anne Polanczyk","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00539-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00539-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Hemophilia are continually monitored at treatment centers to avoid and control bleeding episodes. This study estimated the direct and indirect costs per patient with hemophilia A in Brazil and evaluated the cost variability across different age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational research was conducted with retrospective data collection of patients assisted at three referral blood centers in Brazil. Time-driven Activity-based Costing method was used to analyze direct costs, while indirect costs were estimated based on interviews with family and caregivers. Cost per patient was analyzed according to age categories, stratified into 3 groups (0-11;12-18 or older than 19 years old). The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to confirm the differences in costs across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 140 hemophilia A patients were analyzed; 53 were 0-11 years, 29 were 12-18 years, and the remaining were older than 19 years. The median cost per patient per year was R$450,831 (IQR R$219,842; R$785,149; $174,566), being possible to confirm age as a cost driver: older patients had higher costs than younger's (p = 0.001; median cost: 0-11 yrs R$299,320; 12-18 yrs R$521,936; ≥19 yrs R$718,969).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is innovative in providing cost information for hemophilia A using a microcosting technique. The variation in costs across patient age groups can sustain more accurate health policies driven to increase access to cutting-edge technologies and reduce the burden of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305066/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The European-wide statistics show that the use of flu vaccination remains low and the differences between countries are significant, as are those between different population groups within each country. Considerable research has focused on explaining vaccination uptake in relation to socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health promotion and health behavior factors. Nevertheless, few studies have aimed to analyze between-country differences in the use of flu vaccination for the EU population. To address this gap, this study examines the socio-economic inequalities in the use of influenza vaccination for the population aged 15 years and over in all 27 EU Member States and two other non-EU countries (Iceland and Norway).
Methods: Using data from the third wave of European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2019, we employed a multilevel logistic model with a random intercept for country, which allows controlling simultaneously the variations in individuals' characteristics and macro-contextual factors which could influence the use of flu vaccination. In addition, the analysis considers the population stratified into four age groups, namely adolescents, young adults, adults and elderly, to better capture heterogeneities in flu vaccination uptake.
Results: The main findings confirm the existence of socio-economic inequalities between individuals in different age groups, but also of significant variation between European countries, particularly for older people, in the use of influenza vaccination. In this respect, income and education are strong proxy of socio-economic status associated with flu vaccination uptake. Moreover, these disparities within each population group are also explained by area of residence and occupational status. Particularly for the elderly, the differences between individuals in vaccine utilization are also explained by country-level factors, such as the type of healthcare system adopted in each country, public funding, personal health expenditure burden, or the availability of generalist practitioners.
Conclusions: Overall, our findings reveal that vaccination against seasonal influenza remains a critical public health intervention and bring attention to the relevance of conceiving and implementing context-specific strategies to ensure equitable access to vaccines for all EU citizens.
{"title":"Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach.","authors":"Dănuț-Vasile Jemna, Mihaela David, Liliane Bonnal, Cornel Oros","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European-wide statistics show that the use of flu vaccination remains low and the differences between countries are significant, as are those between different population groups within each country. Considerable research has focused on explaining vaccination uptake in relation to socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health promotion and health behavior factors. Nevertheless, few studies have aimed to analyze between-country differences in the use of flu vaccination for the EU population. To address this gap, this study examines the socio-economic inequalities in the use of influenza vaccination for the population aged 15 years and over in all 27 EU Member States and two other non-EU countries (Iceland and Norway).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the third wave of European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2019, we employed a multilevel logistic model with a random intercept for country, which allows controlling simultaneously the variations in individuals' characteristics and macro-contextual factors which could influence the use of flu vaccination. In addition, the analysis considers the population stratified into four age groups, namely adolescents, young adults, adults and elderly, to better capture heterogeneities in flu vaccination uptake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main findings confirm the existence of socio-economic inequalities between individuals in different age groups, but also of significant variation between European countries, particularly for older people, in the use of influenza vaccination. In this respect, income and education are strong proxy of socio-economic status associated with flu vaccination uptake. Moreover, these disparities within each population group are also explained by area of residence and occupational status. Particularly for the elderly, the differences between individuals in vaccine utilization are also explained by country-level factors, such as the type of healthcare system adopted in each country, public funding, personal health expenditure burden, or the availability of generalist practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our findings reveal that vaccination against seasonal influenza remains a critical public health intervention and bring attention to the relevance of conceiving and implementing context-specific strategies to ensure equitable access to vaccines for all EU citizens.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292999/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141856825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-30DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00537-z
Lena Hasemann, Svenja Elkenkamp, Mitho Müller, Armin Bauer, Stephanie Wallwiener, Wolfgang Greiner
Background: Anxiety and depression are the most prevalent psychiatric diseases in the peripartum period. They can lead to relevant health consequences for mother and child as well as increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and related costs. Due to the promising results of mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) and digital health applications in mental health, an electronic MBI on maternal mental health during pregnancy was implemented and assessed in terms of transferability to standard care in Germany. The present study focused the health economic outcomes of the randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Methods: The analysis, adopting a payer's and a societal perspective, included women of increased emotional distress at < 29 weeks of gestation. We applied inferential statistics (α = 0.05 significance level) to compare the intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) in terms of HCRU and costs. The analysis was primarily based on statutory health insurance claims data which covered the individual observational period of 40 weeks.
Results: Overall, 258 women (IG: 117, CG: 141) were included in the health economic analysis. The results on total health care costs from a payer's perspective indicated higher costs for the IGi compared to the CG (Exp(ß) = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.006-1.194, p = 0.037). However, the estimation was not significant after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.006). Even the analysis from a societal perspective as well as sensitivity analyses did not show significant results.
Conclusions: In the present study, the eMBI did neither reduced nor significantly increased health care costs. Further research is needed to generate robust evidence on eMBIs for women suffering from peripartum depression and anxiety.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00017210. Registered on 13 January 2020. Retrospectively registered.
{"title":"Health economic evaluation of an electronic mindfulness-based intervention (eMBI) to improve maternal mental health during pregnancy - a randomized controlled trial (RCT).","authors":"Lena Hasemann, Svenja Elkenkamp, Mitho Müller, Armin Bauer, Stephanie Wallwiener, Wolfgang Greiner","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00537-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00537-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety and depression are the most prevalent psychiatric diseases in the peripartum period. They can lead to relevant health consequences for mother and child as well as increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and related costs. Due to the promising results of mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) and digital health applications in mental health, an electronic MBI on maternal mental health during pregnancy was implemented and assessed in terms of transferability to standard care in Germany. The present study focused the health economic outcomes of the randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis, adopting a payer's and a societal perspective, included women of increased emotional distress at < 29 weeks of gestation. We applied inferential statistics (α = 0.05 significance level) to compare the intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) in terms of HCRU and costs. The analysis was primarily based on statutory health insurance claims data which covered the individual observational period of 40 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 258 women (IG: 117, CG: 141) were included in the health economic analysis. The results on total health care costs from a payer's perspective indicated higher costs for the IGi compared to the CG (Exp(ß) = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.006-1.194, p = 0.037). However, the estimation was not significant after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.006). Even the analysis from a societal perspective as well as sensitivity analyses did not show significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present study, the eMBI did neither reduced nor significantly increased health care costs. Further research is needed to generate robust evidence on eMBIs for women suffering from peripartum depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00017210. Registered on 13 January 2020. Retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290259/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141793759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00538-y
Martin Dlouhý, Pavel Havlík
Background: Policymakers, who are constantly discussing growing health expenditures, should know whether the health system is efficient. We can provide them with such information through international health system efficiency evaluations. The main objectives of this study are: (a) to evaluate the efficiency of health systems in 28 developed countries by multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) and (b) to identify reasonable benchmark countries for the Czech Republic, for which we collect information on the relative importance of health system inputs and outputs.
Methods: We used MCDA and DEA to evaluate the efficiency of the health systems of 28 developed countries. The models included four health system inputs (health expenditure as a relative share of GDP, the number of physicians, nurses, and hospital beds) and three health system outputs (life expectancy at birth, healthy life expectancy, and infant mortality rate). The sample covers 27 OECD countries and Russia, which is also included in the OECD database. To determine the input and output weights, we used a questionnaire sent to health policy experts in the Czech Republic.
Results: We obtained subjective information on the relative importance of the health system inputs and outputs from 27 Czech health policy experts. We evaluated health system efficiency using four MCDA and two DEA models. According to the MCDA models, Turkey, Poland, and Israel were found to have efficient health systems. The Czech Republic ranked 16th, 19th, 15th, and 17th. The benchmark countries for the Czech Republic's health system were Israel, Estonia, Luxembourg, Italy, the UK, Spain, Slovenia, and Canada. The DEA model with the constant returns to scale identified four technically efficient health systems: Turkey, the UK, Canada, and Sweden. The Czech Republic was found to be one of the worst-performing health systems. The DEA model with the variable returns to scale identified 15 technically efficient health systems. We found that efficiency results are quite robust. With two exceptions, the Spearman rank correlations between each pair of models were statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Conclusions: During the model formulation, we investigated the pitfalls of efficiency measurement in health care and used several practical solutions. We consider MCDA and DEA, above all, as exploratory methods, not methods providing definitive answers.
背景:政策制定者一直在讨论不断增长的医疗支出,他们应该知道医疗系统是否高效。我们可以通过国际卫生系统效率评估为他们提供这方面的信息。本研究的主要目标是(a) 通过多重标准决策分析(MCDA)和数据包络分析(DEA)对 28 个发达国家的卫生系统效率进行评估;(b) 为捷克共和国确定合理的基准国家,并收集有关卫生系统投入和产出相对重要性的信息:我们使用 MCDA 和 DEA 评估了 28 个发达国家卫生系统的效率。模型包括四个卫生系统投入(卫生支出占 GDP 的相对比例、医生、护士和病床数量)和三个卫生系统产出(出生时预期寿命、健康预期寿命和婴儿死亡率)。样本涵盖 27 个经合组织国家和俄罗斯,后者也被纳入经合组织数据库。为了确定投入和产出权重,我们向捷克共和国的卫生政策专家发放了调查问卷:我们从 27 位捷克卫生政策专家那里获得了关于卫生系统投入和产出相对重要性的主观信息。我们使用四个 MCDA 模型和两个 DEA 模型对卫生系统的效率进行了评估。根据 MCDA 模型,我们发现土耳其、波兰和以色列拥有高效的卫生系统。捷克共和国分别排在第 16、19、15 和 17 位。捷克共和国卫生系统的基准国家是以色列、爱沙尼亚、卢森堡、意大利、英国、西班牙、斯洛文尼亚和加拿大。采用规模收益不变的 DEA 模型确定了四个技术上高效的卫生系统:土耳其、英国、加拿大和瑞典。捷克共和国是表现最差的卫生系统之一。采用规模收益可变的 DEA 模型确定了 15 个技术上有效的卫生系统。我们发现,效率结果相当稳健。除了两个例外,每对模型之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关性在 0.05 的水平上都有统计学意义:在制定模型的过程中,我们研究了医疗效率测量的误区,并采用了几种实用的解决方案。我们认为 MCDA 和 DEA 首先是探索性方法,而不是提供确定答案的方法。
{"title":"Efficiency evaluation of 28 health systems by MCDA and DEA.","authors":"Martin Dlouhý, Pavel Havlík","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00538-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00538-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Policymakers, who are constantly discussing growing health expenditures, should know whether the health system is efficient. We can provide them with such information through international health system efficiency evaluations. The main objectives of this study are: (a) to evaluate the efficiency of health systems in 28 developed countries by multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) and (b) to identify reasonable benchmark countries for the Czech Republic, for which we collect information on the relative importance of health system inputs and outputs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used MCDA and DEA to evaluate the efficiency of the health systems of 28 developed countries. The models included four health system inputs (health expenditure as a relative share of GDP, the number of physicians, nurses, and hospital beds) and three health system outputs (life expectancy at birth, healthy life expectancy, and infant mortality rate). The sample covers 27 OECD countries and Russia, which is also included in the OECD database. To determine the input and output weights, we used a questionnaire sent to health policy experts in the Czech Republic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained subjective information on the relative importance of the health system inputs and outputs from 27 Czech health policy experts. We evaluated health system efficiency using four MCDA and two DEA models. According to the MCDA models, Turkey, Poland, and Israel were found to have efficient health systems. The Czech Republic ranked 16th, 19th, 15th, and 17th. The benchmark countries for the Czech Republic's health system were Israel, Estonia, Luxembourg, Italy, the UK, Spain, Slovenia, and Canada. The DEA model with the constant returns to scale identified four technically efficient health systems: Turkey, the UK, Canada, and Sweden. The Czech Republic was found to be one of the worst-performing health systems. The DEA model with the variable returns to scale identified 15 technically efficient health systems. We found that efficiency results are quite robust. With two exceptions, the Spearman rank correlations between each pair of models were statistically significant at the 0.05 level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the model formulation, we investigated the pitfalls of efficiency measurement in health care and used several practical solutions. We consider MCDA and DEA, above all, as exploratory methods, not methods providing definitive answers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285273/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-27DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00534-2
Pei Liu, Zhiping Long, Xuemeng Ding
Background: During the 14th Five-Year Plan, China aims to transform rural migrants into urban citizens and ensure equal access to public services to enhance new urbanization. Understanding migrant workers' settlement intentions is crucial for their citizenship development. Based on the fundamental role of the right to life and health, equalization of basic public health services is essential. Therefore, understanding the potential impact of public health services equalization on the settlement intention of migrant workers is crucial in China's new urbanization.
Method: In this study, we utilized data from the 2017 wave of China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) and employed the Propensity Score Matching method to investigate the impact of basic public health service equalization policy on the settlement intention of migrant workers. Additionally, we utilized the Mediation Effect Model to uncover the impact mechanism.
Results: Our findings indicate that basic public health service equalization policy has a significant positive effect on increasing the settlement intention of migrant workers, with an even greater effect observed among the low-income group, the cross-provincial subsample, and the new generation subsample. The results of the Mediation Effect Model suggest that Basic public health service equalization policy can bolster the subjective integration willingness and subjective identity of migrant workers, thereby enhancing their settlement intention.
Conclusion: Based on the results, we propose to strengthen the promotion of the basic public health service equalization policy and expand the coverage of health records to further increase the settlement intention of migrant workers.
{"title":"The effect of basic public health service equalization on settlement intention of migrant workers in China: the mediating effect model based on subjective feelings.","authors":"Pei Liu, Zhiping Long, Xuemeng Ding","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00534-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00534-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the 14th Five-Year Plan, China aims to transform rural migrants into urban citizens and ensure equal access to public services to enhance new urbanization. Understanding migrant workers' settlement intentions is crucial for their citizenship development. Based on the fundamental role of the right to life and health, equalization of basic public health services is essential. Therefore, understanding the potential impact of public health services equalization on the settlement intention of migrant workers is crucial in China's new urbanization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this study, we utilized data from the 2017 wave of China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) and employed the Propensity Score Matching method to investigate the impact of basic public health service equalization policy on the settlement intention of migrant workers. Additionally, we utilized the Mediation Effect Model to uncover the impact mechanism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that basic public health service equalization policy has a significant positive effect on increasing the settlement intention of migrant workers, with an even greater effect observed among the low-income group, the cross-provincial subsample, and the new generation subsample. The results of the Mediation Effect Model suggest that Basic public health service equalization policy can bolster the subjective integration willingness and subjective identity of migrant workers, thereby enhancing their settlement intention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, we propose to strengthen the promotion of the basic public health service equalization policy and expand the coverage of health records to further increase the settlement intention of migrant workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282816/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-24DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00540-4
Richard C van Kleef, Mieke Reuser, Pieter J A Stam, Wynand P M M van de Ven
Many health insurance markets are organized by principles of regulated competition. Regulators of these markets typically apply risk equalization (aka risk adjustment) and risk sharing to mitigate risk selection. Risk equalization and risk sharing can have various positive and negative effects on efficiency and fairness. This paper provides a comprehensive framework for ex-ante evaluation of these effects. In a first step, we distinguish 22 potential effects. In a second step, we summarize and discuss quantitative measures used for evaluating risk equalization and risk sharing schemes in academic research. To underline the relevance of our work, we compare our framework with an existing framework that was previously used in the Dutch regulated health insurance market. We conclude that this framework is incomplete and uses inappropriate measures. To avoid suboptimal policy choices, we recommend policymakers (1) to consider the entire spectrum of potential effects and (2) to select their measures carefully.
{"title":"A framework for ex-ante evaluation of the potential effects of risk equalization and risk sharing in health insurance markets with regulated competition.","authors":"Richard C van Kleef, Mieke Reuser, Pieter J A Stam, Wynand P M M van de Ven","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00540-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00540-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many health insurance markets are organized by principles of regulated competition. Regulators of these markets typically apply risk equalization (aka risk adjustment) and risk sharing to mitigate risk selection. Risk equalization and risk sharing can have various positive and negative effects on efficiency and fairness. This paper provides a comprehensive framework for ex-ante evaluation of these effects. In a first step, we distinguish 22 potential effects. In a second step, we summarize and discuss quantitative measures used for evaluating risk equalization and risk sharing schemes in academic research. To underline the relevance of our work, we compare our framework with an existing framework that was previously used in the Dutch regulated health insurance market. We conclude that this framework is incomplete and uses inappropriate measures. To avoid suboptimal policy choices, we recommend policymakers (1) to consider the entire spectrum of potential effects and (2) to select their measures carefully.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-22DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00536-0
Siew Wei Yeong, Sit Wai Lee, Siew Chin Ong
This systematic review explores the cost of illness (COI) studies on breast cancer in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). Studies in Cochrane, Proquest Thesis, PubMed and Scopus were considered. The reporting criteria were evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 statement. Studies must (1) be peer-reviewed, (2) report cost data, and (3) be full-text articles. Non-English articles were excluded. Twelve studies were included. The identified costs were made constant to 2022 USD values for reporting and comparison across studies. Annual costs per patient varied from $195 to $11,866 direct medical costs, $201 to $2233 direct non-medical costs and $332 to $26,390 productivity losses were reported. Cost differences were due to the cost types and components in each study. Only three COI studies reported sensitivity analysis and discount rates. Hence, it is recommended that future COI studies include an analysis of correlation between cost components and other variables.
{"title":"Cost of illness of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.","authors":"Siew Wei Yeong, Sit Wai Lee, Siew Chin Ong","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00536-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00536-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review explores the cost of illness (COI) studies on breast cancer in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). Studies in Cochrane, Proquest Thesis, PubMed and Scopus were considered. The reporting criteria were evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 statement. Studies must (1) be peer-reviewed, (2) report cost data, and (3) be full-text articles. Non-English articles were excluded. Twelve studies were included. The identified costs were made constant to 2022 USD values for reporting and comparison across studies. Annual costs per patient varied from $195 to $11,866 direct medical costs, $201 to $2233 direct non-medical costs and $332 to $26,390 productivity losses were reported. Cost differences were due to the cost types and components in each study. Only three COI studies reported sensitivity analysis and discount rates. Hence, it is recommended that future COI studies include an analysis of correlation between cost components and other variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264967/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141736328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Mongolia introduced liver transplantation 10 years ago, becoming the 46th country globally to successfully perform this procedure. However, the cost of liver transplantation treatment remains expensive in Mongolia, a lower-middle-income country. Thus, the need to calculate the cost of liver transplants, a highly-valued treatment, forms the basis for this study.
Methods: This study employed a retrospective research design with secondary data. The primary dataset comprised 143 cases of liver transplantation performed at the First Central Hospital of Mongolia between 2011 and 2021.
Results: The average cost of a liver transplant in Mongolia is $39,589 ± 10,308, with 79.6% being direct costs and 20.4% indirect costs. Of the direct costs, 71% were attributed to drugs, medical equipment, and supplies, while 8.6% accounted for salaries. In terms of the Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, treatment costs were $39,205 ± 10,786 for patients with MELD ≤ 14 points, $40,296 ± 1,517 for patients with MELD 15-20 points, $39,352 ± 8,718 for patients with MELD 21-27 points, and $39,812 ± 9,954 for patients with MELD ≤ 28 points, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.953). However, when calculated according to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score classification, treatment cost for CTP-A patients was $35,970 ± 6,879, for CTP-B patients $41,951 ± 12,195, and for CTP-C patients $37,396 ± 6,701, which was statistically significant (Р=0.015).
Conclusion: The average cost of liver transplantation treatment in Mongolia was $39,589. Despite medical facilities' capacity to treat up to 50 patients annually, the waiting list exceeds 300 individuals, highlighting significant unmet healthcare needs.
{"title":"A decade of liver transplantation in Mongolia: Economic insights and cost analysis.","authors":"Amarjargal Tsengel, Sergelen Orgoi, Otgonbayar Damdinbazar, Bat-Ireedui Badarch, Urnultsaikhan Ganbold, Batsaikhan Batsuuri, Yerkyebulan Mukhtar, Batsaikhan Bat-Erdene, Liu Lei, Tserenbat Bazarsad, Undarmaa Zandanbazar, Gantugs Yundendorj","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00528-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13561-024-00528-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mongolia introduced liver transplantation 10 years ago, becoming the 46th country globally to successfully perform this procedure. However, the cost of liver transplantation treatment remains expensive in Mongolia, a lower-middle-income country. Thus, the need to calculate the cost of liver transplants, a highly-valued treatment, forms the basis for this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a retrospective research design with secondary data. The primary dataset comprised 143 cases of liver transplantation performed at the First Central Hospital of Mongolia between 2011 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average cost of a liver transplant in Mongolia is $39,589 ± 10,308, with 79.6% being direct costs and 20.4% indirect costs. Of the direct costs, 71% were attributed to drugs, medical equipment, and supplies, while 8.6% accounted for salaries. In terms of the Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, treatment costs were $39,205 ± 10,786 for patients with MELD ≤ 14 points, $40,296 ± 1,517 for patients with MELD 15-20 points, $39,352 ± 8,718 for patients with MELD 21-27 points, and $39,812 ± 9,954 for patients with MELD ≤ 28 points, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.953). However, when calculated according to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score classification, treatment cost for CTP-A patients was $35,970 ± 6,879, for CTP-B patients $41,951 ± 12,195, and for CTP-C patients $37,396 ± 6,701, which was statistically significant (Р=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The average cost of liver transplantation treatment in Mongolia was $39,589. Despite medical facilities' capacity to treat up to 50 patients annually, the waiting list exceeds 300 individuals, highlighting significant unmet healthcare needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264777/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}