Pub Date : 2021-02-01Epub Date: 2021-05-18DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2021.1927652
Lei Lei, Zachary Frome Burton
Diverse models have been advanced for the evolution of the genetic code. Here, models for tRNA, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) and genetic code evolution were combined with an understanding of EF-Tu suppression of tRNA 3rd anticodon position wobbling. The result is a highly detailed scheme that describes the placements of all amino acids in the standard genetic code. The model describes evolution of 6-, 4-, 3-, 2- and 1-codon sectors. Innovation in column 3 of the code is explained. Wobbling and code degeneracy are explained. Separate distribution of serine sectors between columns 2 and 4 of the code is described. We conclude that very little chaos contributed to evolution of the genetic code and that the pattern of evolution of aaRS enzymes describes a history of the evolution of the code. A model is proposed to describe the biological selection for the earliest evolution of the code and for protocell evolution.
{"title":"Evolution of the genetic code.","authors":"Lei Lei, Zachary Frome Burton","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2021.1927652","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21541264.2021.1927652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diverse models have been advanced for the evolution of the genetic code. Here, models for tRNA, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) and genetic code evolution were combined with an understanding of EF-Tu suppression of tRNA 3<sup>rd</sup> anticodon position wobbling. The result is a highly detailed scheme that describes the placements of all amino acids in the standard genetic code. The model describes evolution of 6-, 4-, 3-, 2- and 1-codon sectors. Innovation in column 3 of the code is explained. Wobbling and code degeneracy are explained. Separate distribution of serine sectors between columns 2 and 4 of the code is described. We conclude that very little chaos contributed to evolution of the genetic code and that the pattern of evolution of aaRS enzymes describes a history of the evolution of the code. A model is proposed to describe the biological selection for the earliest evolution of the code and for protocell evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"12 1","pages":"28-53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/79/KTRN_12_1927652.PMC8172153.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38992935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-01Epub Date: 2021-02-24DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2021.1890915
Nayef Jarrous, Alexander Rouvinski
The innate immune system has numerous signal transduction pathways that lead to the production of type I interferons in response to exposure of cells to external stimuli. One of these pathways comprises RNA polymerase (Pol) III that senses common DNA viruses, such as cytomegalovirus, vaccinia, herpes simplex virus-1 and varicella zoster virus. This polymerase detects and transcribes viral genomic regions to generate AU-rich transcripts that bring to the induction of type I interferons. Remarkably, Pol III is also stimulated by foreign non-viral DNAs and expression of one of its subunits is induced by an RNA virus, the Sindbis virus. Moreover, a protein subunit of RNase P, which is known to associate with Pol III in initiation complexes, is induced by viral infection. Accordingly, alliance of the two tRNA enzymes in innate immunity merits a consideration.
{"title":"RNA polymerase III and antiviral innate immune response.","authors":"Nayef Jarrous, Alexander Rouvinski","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2021.1890915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2021.1890915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The innate immune system has numerous signal transduction pathways that lead to the production of type I interferons in response to exposure of cells to external stimuli. One of these pathways comprises RNA polymerase (Pol) III that senses common DNA viruses, such as cytomegalovirus, vaccinia, herpes simplex virus-1 and varicella zoster virus. This polymerase detects and transcribes viral genomic regions to generate AU-rich transcripts that bring to the induction of type I interferons. Remarkably, Pol III is also stimulated by foreign non-viral DNAs and expression of one of its subunits is induced by an RNA virus, the Sindbis virus. Moreover, a protein subunit of RNase P, which is known to associate with Pol III in initiation complexes, is induced by viral infection. Accordingly, alliance of the two tRNA enzymes in innate immunity merits a consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2021.1890915","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25397710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1794491
Michael Tellier, Shona Murphy
Next-generation sequencing has become one of the major approaches to investigate transcription regulation. RNA-seq, which sequences the RNA complement, can provide a snapshot of the steady-state le...
{"title":"Incomplete removal of ribosomal RNA can affect chromatin RNA-seq data analysis.","authors":"Michael Tellier, Shona Murphy","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1794491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1794491","url":null,"abstract":"Next-generation sequencing has become one of the major approaches to investigate transcription regulation. RNA-seq, which sequences the RNA complement, can provide a snapshot of the steady-state le...","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 5","pages":"230-235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1794491","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10749510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-10-15DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1825907
Rémi-Xavier Coux, Nick D L Owens, Pablo Navarro
Chromatin accessibility is generally perceived as a common property of active regulatory elements where transcription factors are recruited via DNA-specific interactions and other physico-chemical properties to regulate gene transcription. Recent work in the context of mitosis provides less trivial and potentially more interesting relationships than previously anticipated.
{"title":"Chromatin accessibility and transcription factor binding through the perspective of mitosis.","authors":"Rémi-Xavier Coux, Nick D L Owens, Pablo Navarro","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1825907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1825907","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chromatin accessibility is generally perceived as a common property of active regulatory elements where transcription factors are recruited via DNA-specific interactions and other physico-chemical properties to regulate gene transcription. Recent work in the context of mitosis provides less trivial and potentially more interesting relationships than previously anticipated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":" ","pages":"236-240"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1825907","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38583255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-11-05DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1843958
Nahyun Kong, Inkyung Jung
A large number of distal cis-regulatory elements (cREs) have been annotated in the human genome, which plays a central role in orchestrating spatiotemporal gene expression. Since many cREs regulate non-adjacent genes, long-range cRE-promoter interactions are an important factor in the functional characterization of the engaged cREs. In this regard, recent studies have demonstrated that identification of long-range target genes can decipher the effect of genetic mutations residing within cREs on abnormal gene expression. In addition, investigation of altered long-range cREs-promoter interactions induced by chromosomal rearrangements has revealed their critical roles in pathogenic gene expression. In this review, we briefly discuss how the analysis of 3D chromatin structure can help us understand the functional impact of cREs harboring disease-associated genetic variants and how chromosomal rearrangements disrupting topologically associating domains can lead to pathogenic gene expression.
{"title":"Long-range chromatin interactions in pathogenic gene expression control.","authors":"Nahyun Kong, Inkyung Jung","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1843958","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1843958","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A large number of distal <i>cis</i>-regulatory elements (<i>c</i>REs) have been annotated in the human genome, which plays a central role in orchestrating spatiotemporal gene expression. Since many <i>c</i>REs regulate non-adjacent genes, long-range <i>c</i>RE-promoter interactions are an important factor in the functional characterization of the engaged <i>c</i>REs. In this regard, recent studies have demonstrated that identification of long-range target genes can decipher the effect of genetic mutations residing within <i>c</i>REs on abnormal gene expression. In addition, investigation of altered long-range <i>c</i>REs-promoter interactions induced by chromosomal rearrangements has revealed their critical roles in pathogenic gene expression. In this review, we briefly discuss how the analysis of 3D chromatin structure can help us understand the functional impact of <i>c</i>REs harboring disease-associated genetic variants and how chromosomal rearrangements disrupting topologically associating domains can lead to pathogenic gene expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":" ","pages":"211-216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1843958","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38570375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1790990
Jennifer L Boots, Frederike von Pelchrzim, Adam Weiss, Bob Zimmermann, Theres Friesacher, Maximilian Radtke, Marek Żywicki, Doris Chen, Katarzyna Matylla-Kulińska, Bojan Zagrovic, Renée Schroeder
Transcription elongation is a highly regulated process affected by many proteins, RNAs and the underlying DNA. Here we show that the nascent RNA can interfere with transcription in human cells, extending our previous findings from bacteria and yeast. We identified a variety of Pol II-binding aptamers (RAPs), prominent in repeat elements such as ACRO1 satellites, LINE1 retrotransposons and CA simple repeats, and also in several protein-coding genes. ACRO1 repeat, when translated in silico, exhibits ~50% identity with the Pol II CTD sequence. Taken together with a recent proposal that proteins in general tend to interact with RNAs similar to their cognate mRNAs, this suggests a mechanism for RAP binding. Using a reporter construct, we show that ACRO1 potently inhibits Pol II elongation in cis. We propose a novel mode of transcriptional regulation in humans, in which the nascent RNA binds Pol II to silence its own expression.
转录延伸是一个高度调控的过程,受许多蛋白质、rna和潜在DNA的影响。在这里,我们展示了新生RNA可以干扰人类细胞的转录,扩展了我们之前在细菌和酵母上的发现。我们发现了多种Pol ii结合适体(RAPs),主要存在于重复元件如ACRO1卫星、LINE1反转录转座子和CA简单重复中,以及一些蛋白质编码基因中。当在计算机上翻译时,ACRO1重复序列与Pol II CTD序列有50%的一致性。结合最近提出的蛋白质通常倾向于与其同源mrna相似的rna相互作用的建议,这表明RAP结合的机制。使用报告结构,我们发现ACRO1有效地抑制顺式Pol II延伸。我们提出了一种新的人类转录调控模式,其中新生RNA结合Pol II以沉默其自身的表达。
{"title":"RNA polymerase II-binding aptamers in human ACRO1 satellites disrupt transcription <i>in cis</i>.","authors":"Jennifer L Boots, Frederike von Pelchrzim, Adam Weiss, Bob Zimmermann, Theres Friesacher, Maximilian Radtke, Marek Żywicki, Doris Chen, Katarzyna Matylla-Kulińska, Bojan Zagrovic, Renée Schroeder","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1790990","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1790990","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcription elongation is a highly regulated process affected by many proteins, RNAs and the underlying DNA. Here we show that the nascent RNA can interfere with transcription in human cells, extending our previous findings from bacteria and yeast. We identified a variety of Pol II-binding aptamers (RAPs), prominent in repeat elements such as ACRO1 satellites, LINE1 retrotransposons and CA simple repeats, and also in several protein-coding genes. ACRO1 repeat, when translated <i>in silico</i>, exhibits ~50% identity with the Pol II CTD sequence. Taken together with a recent proposal that proteins in general tend to interact with RNAs similar to their cognate mRNAs, this suggests a mechanism for RAP binding. Using a reporter construct, we show that ACRO1 potently inhibits Pol II elongation <i>in cis</i>. We propose a novel mode of transcriptional regulation in humans, in which the nascent RNA binds Pol II to silence its own expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 5","pages":"217-229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1790990","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10592515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-10-28DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1838865
Breanna R Wenck, Thomas J Santangelo
Increasingly sophisticated biochemical and genetic techniques are unraveling the regulatory factors and mechanisms that control gene expression in the Archaea. While some similarities in regulatory strategies are universal, archaeal-specific regulatory strategies are emerging to complement a complex patchwork of shared archaeal-bacterial and archaeal-eukaryotic regulatory mechanisms employed in the archaeal domain. The prokaryotic archaea encode core transcription components with homology to the eukaryotic transcription apparatus and also share a simplified eukaryotic-like initiation mechanism, but also deploy tactics common to bacterial systems to regulate promoter usage and influence elongation-termination decisions. We review the recently established complete archaeal transcription cycle, highlight recent findings of the archaeal transcription community and detail the expanding post-initiation regulation imposed on archaeal transcription.
{"title":"Archaeal transcription.","authors":"Breanna R Wenck, Thomas J Santangelo","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1838865","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1838865","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasingly sophisticated biochemical and genetic techniques are unraveling the regulatory factors and mechanisms that control gene expression in the Archaea. While some similarities in regulatory strategies are universal, archaeal-specific regulatory strategies are emerging to complement a complex patchwork of shared archaeal-bacterial and archaeal-eukaryotic regulatory mechanisms employed in the archaeal domain. The prokaryotic archaea encode core transcription components with homology to the eukaryotic transcription apparatus and also share a simplified eukaryotic-like initiation mechanism, but also deploy tactics common to bacterial systems to regulate promoter usage and influence elongation-termination decisions. We review the recently established complete archaeal transcription cycle, highlight recent findings of the archaeal transcription community and detail the expanding post-initiation regulation imposed on archaeal transcription.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":" ","pages":"199-210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714419/pdf/KTRN_11_1838865.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38537161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1837498
M Crespi
Photosynthetic organisms on land and in water produce the biomass and oxygen necessary for life on Earth. They are the first link in the food chain contributing to the life cycle. Plants, as sessile organisms, are forced to adapt to changing environmental constraints in order to ensure their growth and the faithful transmission of their genetic information. Plants are key elements for food, feed, human health, the environment and industry, and to improve plant production in a sustainable way is a major challenge for the future. In the current context of population growth and limitation of arable lands and fossil resources, global food security is intertwined with understanding how plants grow, differentiate and adapt to a changing environment. Indeed, plants have the ability to express different phenotypes from a given genotype, depending on multiple environmental stimuli as well as the capacity to regenerate their organs (e.g. leaves) in direct response to the environment (e.g. summer light conditions). This major phenotypic and developmental plasticity is a critical feature of plants and implies sophisticated molecular mechanisms regulating the expression of genes and the inheritance of expression patterns[1]. Indeed, environmental cues (e.g. light) have a strong impact on transcription in plant cells and changes in gene activity can also take place without altering the DNA sequence. These gene expression changes can pass on during cell divisions from one generation to the next (the foundation of “epigenetics”) or can be reversible once the environmental constraint fades. Plants partially achieve this growth and developmental plasticity by modulating the repertoire of transcribed genes. Advances in molecular biology and biotechnologies (e.g. high-throughput sequencing) have brought about a new dimension in the understanding of the mechanisms regulating the expression and transmission of genetic information in response to the environment. However, it also evidenced that post-transcriptional processes, such as alternative splicing, non-coding RNA mediated regulations or mRNA stability, also emerged as a key mechanism for gene regulation during plant adaptation to the environment[2]. Consequently, photosynthetic organisms, by their way of life, their phenotypic plasticity and their great ecological diversity constitute interesting experimental models to deciphering new ins and outs of transcriptional and epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in the regulation of developmental and phenotypic plasticity, adaptation to biotic and abiotic stresses and, in the longer term, the evolution of life in a changing environment. Due to these fascinating aspects of plant biology, in this issue of transcription, we decide to revise several emerging trends in plant transcriptional regulatory mechanisms and explore future research venues. We start with the review of de Leone et al [3]. which describes a thorough update on the transcriptional regulations involved in the
{"title":"Plant transcription links environmental cues and phenotypic plasticity.","authors":"M Crespi","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1837498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1837498","url":null,"abstract":"Photosynthetic organisms on land and in water produce the biomass and oxygen necessary for life on Earth. They are the first link in the food chain contributing to the life cycle. Plants, as sessile organisms, are forced to adapt to changing environmental constraints in order to ensure their growth and the faithful transmission of their genetic information. Plants are key elements for food, feed, human health, the environment and industry, and to improve plant production in a sustainable way is a major challenge for the future. In the current context of population growth and limitation of arable lands and fossil resources, global food security is intertwined with understanding how plants grow, differentiate and adapt to a changing environment. Indeed, plants have the ability to express different phenotypes from a given genotype, depending on multiple environmental stimuli as well as the capacity to regenerate their organs (e.g. leaves) in direct response to the environment (e.g. summer light conditions). This major phenotypic and developmental plasticity is a critical feature of plants and implies sophisticated molecular mechanisms regulating the expression of genes and the inheritance of expression patterns[1]. Indeed, environmental cues (e.g. light) have a strong impact on transcription in plant cells and changes in gene activity can also take place without altering the DNA sequence. These gene expression changes can pass on during cell divisions from one generation to the next (the foundation of “epigenetics”) or can be reversible once the environmental constraint fades. Plants partially achieve this growth and developmental plasticity by modulating the repertoire of transcribed genes. Advances in molecular biology and biotechnologies (e.g. high-throughput sequencing) have brought about a new dimension in the understanding of the mechanisms regulating the expression and transmission of genetic information in response to the environment. However, it also evidenced that post-transcriptional processes, such as alternative splicing, non-coding RNA mediated regulations or mRNA stability, also emerged as a key mechanism for gene regulation during plant adaptation to the environment[2]. Consequently, photosynthetic organisms, by their way of life, their phenotypic plasticity and their great ecological diversity constitute interesting experimental models to deciphering new ins and outs of transcriptional and epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in the regulation of developmental and phenotypic plasticity, adaptation to biotic and abiotic stresses and, in the longer term, the evolution of life in a changing environment. Due to these fascinating aspects of plant biology, in this issue of transcription, we decide to revise several emerging trends in plant transcriptional regulatory mechanisms and explore future research venues. We start with the review of de Leone et al [3]. which describes a thorough update on the transcriptional regulations involved in the","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"97-99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1837498","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38655206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01Epub Date: 2020-09-16DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1820300
María José de Leone, C Esteban Hernando, Santiago Mora-García, Marcelo J Yanovsky
Most living organisms possess an internal timekeeping mechanism known as the circadian clock, which enhances fitness by synchronizing the internal timing of biological processes with diurnal and seasonal environmental changes. In plants, the pace of these biological rhythms relies on oscillations in the expression level of hundreds of genes tightly controlled by a group of core clock regulators and co-regulators that engage in transcriptional and translational feedback loops. In the last decade, the role of several core clock genes in the control of defense responses has been addressed, and a growing amount of evidence demonstrates that circadian regulation is relevant for plant immunity. A reciprocal connection between these pathways was also established following the observation that in Arabidopsis thaliana, as well as in crop species like tomato, plant-pathogen interactions trigger a reconfiguration of the circadian transcriptional network. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the interaction between the circadian clock and biotic stress responses at the transcriptional level, and discuss the relevance of this crosstalk in the plant-pathogen evolutionary arms race. A better understanding of these processes could aid in the development of genetic tools that improve traditional breeding practices, enhancing tolerance to plant diseases that threaten crop yield and food security all around the world.
{"title":"It's a matter of time: the role of transcriptional regulation in the circadian clock-pathogen crosstalk in plants.","authors":"María José de Leone, C Esteban Hernando, Santiago Mora-García, Marcelo J Yanovsky","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1820300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1820300","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most living organisms possess an internal timekeeping mechanism known as the circadian clock, which enhances fitness by synchronizing the internal timing of biological processes with diurnal and seasonal environmental changes. In plants, the pace of these biological rhythms relies on oscillations in the expression level of hundreds of genes tightly controlled by a group of core clock regulators and co-regulators that engage in transcriptional and translational feedback loops. In the last decade, the role of several core clock genes in the control of defense responses has been addressed, and a growing amount of evidence demonstrates that circadian regulation is relevant for plant immunity. A reciprocal connection between these pathways was also established following the observation that in <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>, as well as in crop species like tomato, plant-pathogen interactions trigger a reconfiguration of the circadian transcriptional network. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the interaction between the circadian clock and biotic stress responses at the transcriptional level, and discuss the relevance of this crosstalk in the plant-pathogen evolutionary arms race. A better understanding of these processes could aid in the development of genetic tools that improve traditional breeding practices, enhancing tolerance to plant diseases that threaten crop yield and food security all around the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"100-116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1820300","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38482919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01Epub Date: 2020-05-14DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1764312
Leandro Lucero, Camille Fonouni-Farde, Martin Crespi, Federico Ariel
ABSTRACT The advent of novel high-throughput sequencing techniques has revealed that eukaryotic genomes are massively transcribed although only a small fraction of RNAs exhibits protein-coding capacity. In the last years, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as regulators of eukaryotic gene expression in a wide range of molecular mechanisms. Plant lncRNAs can be transcribed by alternative RNA polymerases, acting directly as long transcripts or can be processed into active small RNAs. Several lncRNAs have been recently shown to interact with chromatin, DNA or nuclear proteins to condition the epigenetic environment of target genes or modulate the activity of transcriptional complexes. In this review, we will summarize the recent discoveries about the actions of plant lncRNAs in the regulation of gene expression at the transcriptional level.
{"title":"Long noncoding RNAs shape transcription in plants.","authors":"Leandro Lucero, Camille Fonouni-Farde, Martin Crespi, Federico Ariel","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1764312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1764312","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The advent of novel high-throughput sequencing techniques has revealed that eukaryotic genomes are massively transcribed although only a small fraction of RNAs exhibits protein-coding capacity. In the last years, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as regulators of eukaryotic gene expression in a wide range of molecular mechanisms. Plant lncRNAs can be transcribed by alternative RNA polymerases, acting directly as long transcripts or can be processed into active small RNAs. Several lncRNAs have been recently shown to interact with chromatin, DNA or nuclear proteins to condition the epigenetic environment of target genes or modulate the activity of transcriptional complexes. In this review, we will summarize the recent discoveries about the actions of plant lncRNAs in the regulation of gene expression at the transcriptional level.","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"160-171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1764312","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37935159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}