Pub Date : 2020-06-01Epub Date: 2020-08-12DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1803031
Leandro Quadrana
Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive DNA sequences with the ability to replicate across genomes and generate mutations with major transcriptional effects. Epigenetic silencing mechanisms that target TEs to limit their activity, including DNA methylation, add to the range of gene expression variants generated by TEs. Here, using the iconic gene flowering locus C (FLC) as a case study I discuss the multiple ways by which TEs can affect the expression of genes and contribute to the adaptation of plants to changing environments.
{"title":"The contribution of transposable elements to transcriptional novelty in plants: the <i>FLC</i> affair.","authors":"Leandro Quadrana","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1803031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1803031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive DNA sequences with the ability to replicate across genomes and generate mutations with major transcriptional effects. Epigenetic silencing mechanisms that target TEs to limit their activity, including DNA methylation, add to the range of gene expression variants generated by TEs. Here, using the iconic gene flowering locus C (<i>FLC)</i> as a case study I discuss the multiple ways by which TEs can affect the expression of genes and contribute to the adaptation of plants to changing environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"192-198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1803031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38256095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01Epub Date: 2020-08-04DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1796473
Rocío S Tognacca, M Guillermina Kubaczka, Lucas Servi, Florencia S Rodríguez, Micaela A Godoy Herz, Ezequiel Petrillo
Plants have a high level of developmental plasticity that allows them to respond and adapt to changes in the environment. Among the environmental cues, light controls almost every aspect of A. thaliana's life cycle, including seed maturation, seed germination, seedling de-etiolation and flowering time. Light signals induce massive reprogramming of gene expression, producing changes in RNA polymerase II transcription, alternative splicing, and chromatin state. Since splicing reactions occur mainly while transcription takes place, the regulation of RNAPII transcription has repercussions in the splicing outcomes. This cotranscriptional nature allows a functional coupling between transcription and splicing, in which properties of the splicing reactions are affected by the transcriptional process. Chromatin landscapes influence both transcription and splicing. In this review, we highlight, summarize and discuss recent progress in the field to gain a comprehensive insight on the cross-regulation between chromatin state, RNAPII transcription and splicing decisions in plants, with a special focus on light-triggered responses. We also introduce several examples of transcription and splicing factors that could be acting as coupling factors in plants. Unravelling how these connected regulatory networks operate, can help in the design of better crops with higher productivity and tolerance.
{"title":"Light in the transcription landscape: chromatin, RNA polymerase II and splicing throughout <i>Arabidopsis thaliana's</i> life cycle.","authors":"Rocío S Tognacca, M Guillermina Kubaczka, Lucas Servi, Florencia S Rodríguez, Micaela A Godoy Herz, Ezequiel Petrillo","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1796473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1796473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plants have a high level of developmental plasticity that allows them to respond and adapt to changes in the environment. Among the environmental cues, light controls almost every aspect of <i>A. thaliana's</i> life cycle, including seed maturation, seed germination, seedling de-etiolation and flowering time. Light signals induce massive reprogramming of gene expression, producing changes in RNA polymerase II transcription, alternative splicing, and chromatin state. Since splicing reactions occur mainly while transcription takes place, the regulation of RNAPII transcription has repercussions in the splicing outcomes. This cotranscriptional nature allows a functional coupling between transcription and splicing, in which properties of the splicing reactions are affected by the transcriptional process. Chromatin landscapes influence both transcription and splicing. In this review, we highlight, summarize and discuss recent progress in the field to gain a comprehensive insight on the cross-regulation between chromatin state, RNAPII transcription and splicing decisions in plants, with a special focus on light-triggered responses. We also introduce several examples of transcription and splicing factors that could be acting as coupling factors in plants. Unravelling how these connected regulatory networks operate, can help in the design of better crops with higher productivity and tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"117-133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1796473","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38233393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01Epub Date: 2020-11-12DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1825906
Bart Rymen, Laura Ferrafiat, Todd Blevins
Multisubunit RNA polymerase (Pol) complexes are the core machinery for gene expression in eukaryotes. The enzymes Pol I, Pol II and Pol III transcribe distinct subsets of nuclear genes. This family of nuclear RNA polymerases expanded in terrestrial plants by the duplication of Pol II subunit genes. Two Pol II-related enzymes, Pol IV and Pol V, are highly specialized in the production of regulatory, non-coding RNAs. Pol IV and Pol V are the central players of RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), an RNA interference pathway that represses transposable elements (TEs) and selected genes. Genetic and biochemical analyses of Pol IV/V subunits are now revealing how these enzymes evolved from ancestral Pol II to sustain non-coding RNA biogenesis in silent chromatin. Intriguingly, Pol IV-RdDM regulates genes that influence flowering time, reproductive development, stress responses and plant-pathogen interactions. Pol IV target genes vary among closely related taxa, indicating that these regulatory circuits are often species-specific. Data from crops like maize, rice, tomato and Brassicarapa suggest that dynamic repositioning of TEs, accompanied by Pol IV targeting to TE-proximal genes, leads to the reprogramming of plant gene expression over short evolutionary timescales.
多亚基RNA聚合酶(Pol)复合物是真核生物基因表达的核心机制。酶Pol I, Pol II和Pol III转录不同的核基因亚群。这个核RNA聚合酶家族通过Pol II亚基基因的复制在陆生植物中扩展。两种与Pol ii相关的酶,Pol IV和Pol V,是高度专门化的调节非编码rna的产生。Pol IV和Pol V是RNA定向DNA甲基化(RdDM)的核心参与者,RdDM是一种RNA干扰途径,可抑制转座因子(te)和选定基因。Pol IV/V亚基的遗传和生化分析现在揭示了这些酶如何从祖先Pol II进化到维持沉默染色质中的非编码RNA生物发生。有趣的是,Pol IV-RdDM调节影响开花时间、生殖发育、胁迫反应和植物与病原体相互作用的基因。Pol IV靶基因在密切相关的分类群中存在差异,表明这些调控回路通常具有物种特异性。来自玉米、水稻、番茄和芸苔等作物的数据表明,te的动态重新定位,伴随着Pol IV靶向te近端基因,导致植物基因表达在短进化时间尺度上的重编程。
{"title":"Non-coding RNA polymerases that silence transposable elements and reprogram gene expression in plants.","authors":"Bart Rymen, Laura Ferrafiat, Todd Blevins","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1825906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1825906","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multisubunit RNA polymerase (Pol) complexes are the core machinery for gene expression in eukaryotes. The enzymes Pol I, Pol II and Pol III transcribe distinct subsets of nuclear genes. This family of nuclear RNA polymerases expanded in terrestrial plants by the duplication of Pol II subunit genes. Two Pol II-related enzymes, Pol IV and Pol V, are highly specialized in the production of regulatory, non-coding RNAs. Pol IV and Pol V are the central players of RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), an RNA interference pathway that represses transposable elements (TEs) and selected genes. Genetic and biochemical analyses of Pol IV/V subunits are now revealing how these enzymes evolved from ancestral Pol II to sustain non-coding RNA biogenesis in silent chromatin. Intriguingly, Pol IV-RdDM regulates genes that influence flowering time, reproductive development, stress responses and plant-pathogen interactions. Pol IV target genes vary among closely related taxa, indicating that these regulatory circuits are often species-specific. Data from crops like maize, rice, tomato and <i>Brassica</i><i>rapa</i> suggest that dynamic repositioning of TEs, accompanied by Pol IV targeting to TE-proximal genes, leads to the reprogramming of plant gene expression over short evolutionary timescales.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"172-191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1825906","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38593613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01Epub Date: 2020-10-04DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1820299
Mai Jarad, Rea Antoniou-Kourounioti, Jo Hepworth, Julia I Qüesta
Plants have adapted to tolerate and survive constantly changing environmental conditions by reprogramming gene expression in response to stress or to drive developmental transitions. Among the many signals that plants perceive, light and temperature are of particular interest due to their intensely fluctuating nature which is combined with a long-term seasonal trend. Whereas specific receptors are key in the light-sensing mechanism, the identity of plant thermosensors for high and low temperatures remains far from fully addressed. This review aims at discussing common as well as divergent characteristics of gene expression regulation in plants, controlled by light and temperature. Light and temperature signaling control the abundance of specific transcription factors, as well as the dynamics of co-transcriptional processes such as RNA polymerase elongation rate and alternative splicing patterns. Additionally, sensing both types of cues modulates gene expression by altering the chromatin landscape and through the induction of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). However, while light sensing is channeled through dedicated receptors, temperature can broadly affect chemical reactions inside plant cells. Thus, direct thermal modifications of the transcriptional machinery add another level of complexity to plant transcriptional regulation. Besides the rapid transcriptome changes that follow perception of environmental signals, plant developmental transitions and acquisition of stress tolerance depend on long-term maintenance of transcriptional states (active or silenced genes). Thus, the rapid transcriptional response to the signal (Phase I) can be distinguished from the long-term memory of the acquired transcriptional state (Phase II - remembering the signal). In this review we discuss recent advances in light and temperature signal perception, integration and memory in Arabidopsis thaliana, focusing on transcriptional regulation and highlighting the contrasting and unique features of each type of cue in the process.
{"title":"Unique and contrasting effects of light and temperature cues on plant transcriptional programs.","authors":"Mai Jarad, Rea Antoniou-Kourounioti, Jo Hepworth, Julia I Qüesta","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1820299","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1820299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plants have adapted to tolerate and survive constantly changing environmental conditions by reprogramming gene expression in response to stress or to drive developmental transitions. Among the many signals that plants perceive, light and temperature are of particular interest due to their intensely fluctuating nature which is combined with a long-term seasonal trend. Whereas specific receptors are key in the light-sensing mechanism, the identity of plant thermosensors for high and low temperatures remains far from fully addressed. This review aims at discussing common as well as divergent characteristics of gene expression regulation in plants, controlled by light and temperature. Light and temperature signaling control the abundance of specific transcription factors, as well as the dynamics of co-transcriptional processes such as RNA polymerase elongation rate and alternative splicing patterns. Additionally, sensing both types of cues modulates gene expression by altering the chromatin landscape and through the induction of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). However, while light sensing is channeled through dedicated receptors, temperature can broadly affect chemical reactions inside plant cells. Thus, direct thermal modifications of the transcriptional machinery add another level of complexity to plant transcriptional regulation. Besides the rapid transcriptome changes that follow perception of environmental signals, plant developmental transitions and acquisition of stress tolerance depend on long-term maintenance of transcriptional states (active or silenced genes). Thus, the rapid transcriptional response to the signal (Phase I) can be distinguished from the long-term memory of the acquired transcriptional state (Phase II - remembering the signal). In this review we discuss recent advances in light and temperature signal perception, integration and memory in <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>, focusing on transcriptional regulation and highlighting the contrasting and unique features of each type of cue in the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"134-159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1820299","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38550193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-01Epub Date: 2020-05-13DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1762468
Danielle E Lyons, Sarah McMahon, Melanie Ott
The production of mRNA is a dynamic process that is highly regulated by reversible post-translational modifications of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II. The CTD is a highly repetitive domain consisting mostly of the consensus heptad sequence Tyr1-Ser2-Pro3-Thr4-Ser5-Pro6-Ser7. Phosphorylation of serine residues within this repeat sequence is well studied, but modifications of all residues have been described. Here, we focus on integrating newly identified and lesser-studied CTD post-translational modifications into the existing framework. We also review the growing body of work demonstrating crosstalk between different CTD modifications and the functional consequences of such crosstalk on the dynamics of transcriptional regulation.
{"title":"A combinatorial view of old and new RNA polymerase II modifications.","authors":"Danielle E Lyons, Sarah McMahon, Melanie Ott","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1762468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1762468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The production of mRNA is a dynamic process that is highly regulated by reversible post-translational modifications of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II. The CTD is a highly repetitive domain consisting mostly of the consensus heptad sequence Tyr1-Ser2-Pro3-Thr4-Ser5-Pro6-Ser7. Phosphorylation of serine residues within this repeat sequence is well studied, but modifications of all residues have been described. Here, we focus on integrating newly identified and lesser-studied CTD post-translational modifications into the existing framework. We also review the growing body of work demonstrating crosstalk between different CTD modifications and the functional consequences of such crosstalk on the dynamics of transcriptional regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 2","pages":"66-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1762468","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37930563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-01Epub Date: 2019-12-27DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2019.1707612
Hande Boyaci, Ruth M Saecker, Elizabeth A Campbell
Recent biophysical studies of mycobacterial transcription have shed new light on this fundamental process in a group of bacteria that includes deadly pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab), Mycobacterium leprae (Mlp), as well as the nonpathogenic Mycobacterium smegmatis (Msm). Most of the research has focused on Mtb, the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), which remains one of the top ten causes of death globally. The enzyme RNA polymerase (RNAP) is responsible for all bacterial transcription and is a target for one of the crucial antibiotics used for TB treatment, rifampicin (Rif). Here, we summarize recent biophysical studies of mycobacterial RNAP that have advanced our understanding of the basic process of transcription, have revealed novel paradigms for regulation, and thus have provided critical information required for developing new antibiotics against this deadly disease.
{"title":"Transcription initiation in mycobacteria: a biophysical perspective.","authors":"Hande Boyaci, Ruth M Saecker, Elizabeth A Campbell","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2019.1707612","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2019.1707612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent biophysical studies of mycobacterial transcription have shed new light on this fundamental process in a group of bacteria that includes deadly pathogens such as <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (<i>Mtb), Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (<i>Mab), Mycobacterium leprae</i> (<i>Mlp</i>), as well as the nonpathogenic <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i> (<i>Msm</i>). Most of the research has focused on <i>Mtb</i>, the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), which remains one of the top ten causes of death globally. The enzyme RNA polymerase (RNAP) is responsible for all bacterial transcription and is a target for one of the crucial antibiotics used for TB treatment, rifampicin (Rif). Here, we summarize recent biophysical studies of mycobacterial RNAP that have advanced our understanding of the basic process of transcription, have revealed novel paradigms for regulation, and thus have provided critical information required for developing new antibiotics against this deadly disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 2","pages":"53-65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2019.1707612","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37493204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-01Epub Date: 2020-06-11DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1777047
Yadong Sun, Keith Hamilton, Liang Tong
The majority of eukaryotic messenger RNA precursors (pre-mRNAs) undergo cleavage and polyadenylation at their 3' end. This canonical 3'-end processing depends on sequence elements in the pre-mRNA as well as a mega-dalton protein machinery. The cleavage site in mammalian pre-mRNAs is located between an upstream poly(A) signal, most frequently an AAUAAA hexamer, and a GU-rich downstream sequence element. This review will summarize recent advances from the studies on this canonical 3'-end processing machinery. They have revealed the molecular mechanism for the recognition of the poly(A) signal and provided the first glimpse into the overall architecture of the machinery. The studies also show that the machinery is highly dynamic conformationally, and extensive re-arrangements are necessary for its activation. Inhibitors targeting the active site of the CPSF73 nuclease of this machinery have anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory and anti-protozoal effects, indicating that CPSF73 and pre-mRNA 3'-end processing in general are attractive targets for drug discovery.
{"title":"Recent molecular insights into canonical pre-mRNA 3'-end processing.","authors":"Yadong Sun, Keith Hamilton, Liang Tong","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1777047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1777047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The majority of eukaryotic messenger RNA precursors (pre-mRNAs) undergo cleavage and polyadenylation at their 3' end. This canonical 3'-end processing depends on sequence elements in the pre-mRNA as well as a mega-dalton protein machinery. The cleavage site in mammalian pre-mRNAs is located between an upstream poly(A) signal, most frequently an AAUAAA hexamer, and a GU-rich downstream sequence element. This review will summarize recent advances from the studies on this canonical 3'-end processing machinery. They have revealed the molecular mechanism for the recognition of the poly(A) signal and provided the first glimpse into the overall architecture of the machinery. The studies also show that the machinery is highly dynamic conformationally, and extensive re-arrangements are necessary for its activation. Inhibitors targeting the active site of the CPSF73 nuclease of this machinery have anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory and anti-protozoal effects, indicating that CPSF73 and pre-mRNA 3'-end processing in general are attractive targets for drug discovery.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>APA: alternative polyadenylation; β-CASP: metallo-β-lactamase-associated CPSF Artemis SNM1/PSO2; CTD: C-terminal domain; CF: cleavage factor; CPF: cleavage and polyadenylation factor; CPSF: cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor; CstF: cleavage stimulation factor; DSE: downstream element; HAT: half a TPR; HCC: histone pre-mRNA cleavage complex; mCF: mammalian cleavage factor; mPSF: mammalian polyadenylation specificity factor; mRNA: messenger RNA; nt: nucleotide; NTD: N-terminal domain; PAP: polyadenylate polymerase; PAS: polyadenylation signal; PIM: mPSF interaction motif; Poly(A): polyadenylation, polyadenylate; Pol II: RNA polymerase II; pre-mRNA: messenger RNA precursor; RRM: RNA recognition module, RNA recognition motif; snRNP: small nuclear ribonucleoprotein; TPR: tetratricopeptide repeat; UTR: untranslated region; ZF: zinc finger.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 2","pages":"83-96"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1777047","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38034642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-01Epub Date: 2019-12-19DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2019.1704128
Joseph F Cardiello, Gilson J Sanchez, Mary A Allen, Robin D Dowell
Nascent transcription assays, such as global run-on sequencing (GRO-seq) and precision run-on sequencing (PRO-seq), have uncovered a myriad of unstable RNAs being actively produced from numerous sites genome-wide. These transcripts provide a more complete and immediate picture of the impact of regulatory events. Transcription factors recruit RNA polymerase II, effectively initiating the process of transcription; repressors inhibit polymerase recruitment. Efficiency of recruitment is dictated by sequence elements in and around the RNA polymerase loading zone. A combination of sequence elements and RNA binding proteins subsequently influence the ultimate stability of the resulting transcript. Some of these transcripts are capable of providing feedback on the process, influencing subsequent transcription. By monitoring RNA polymerase activity, nascent assays provide insights into every step of the regulated process of transcription.
{"title":"Lessons from eRNAs: understanding transcriptional regulation through the lens of nascent RNAs.","authors":"Joseph F Cardiello, Gilson J Sanchez, Mary A Allen, Robin D Dowell","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2019.1704128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2019.1704128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nascent transcription assays, such as global run-on sequencing (GRO-seq) and precision run-on sequencing (PRO-seq), have uncovered a myriad of unstable RNAs being actively produced from numerous sites genome-wide. These transcripts provide a more complete and immediate picture of the impact of regulatory events. Transcription factors recruit RNA polymerase II, effectively initiating the process of transcription; repressors inhibit polymerase recruitment. Efficiency of recruitment is dictated by sequence elements in and around the RNA polymerase loading zone. A combination of sequence elements and RNA binding proteins subsequently influence the ultimate stability of the resulting transcript. Some of these transcripts are capable of providing feedback on the process, influencing subsequent transcription. By monitoring RNA polymerase activity, nascent assays provide insights into every step of the regulated process of transcription.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 1","pages":"3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2019.1704128","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37473781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-01DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1724673
Joaquin M Espinosa
Completion of the Human Genome Project almost twenty years ago produced a humbling surprise: biological complexity is driven not so much by the number of genes in a genome, but rather by increased regulatory diversity. The ability of multicellular organisms to turn genes on and off in various combinations not only drives the appearance of a cornucopia of differentiated cell types with vastly different functions, but also provides the capacity for homeostasis in a wide range of environmental conditions. Central to this increased regulatory capacity are DNA sequences that control gene activity. Among these, distal enhancer elements have captured the imagination of scientists since their initial discovery in 1983 [1–3], and their study continues to produce new mysteries. How do enhancers really work? How much of their action is driven by the mere binding of transcription factors? What are the roles of chromatin modifications and three-dimensional conformation in enhancer function? How about enhancer-derived RNAs (eRNAs)? Finding answers to these questions is not simply a basic science exercise, as genetic alterations leading to enhancer dysfunction, such as translocations, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and mutations are recognized sources of human variation, susceptibility to disease, and known drivers of cancer progression. Within this framework, in this issue of Transcription, we are glad to publish a series of reviews focused on enhancers. First, Lewis et al. get us started with a thorough and entertaining update on transcriptional control by enhancers and eRNAs[4]. Then, Cardiello et al. dive deeper into the fascinating world of eRNAs and other RNA species arising from regulatory elements identified by novel measurements of nascent RNA[5]. We then transition into the realm of chromatin, where Rahnamoun et al. report on the regulatory interplay between eRNAs, histone modifications, and epigenetic readers[6]. Next, Yao et al. provide an updated account of the role of enhancer reprogramming in tumorigenesis and cancer development[7]. Lastly, BarajasMora and Feeney discuss recent interesting results about the role of enhancers as organizers of chromatin configurations important for shaping the repertoire of immunoglobulins produced by VDJ recombination[8]. Altogether, this collection of reviews provides an important update on the state of the field, while also identifying new avenues of future research. We are grateful to all authors for their expert contributions, and hope that the readers of Transcription will treasure this issue focused on enhancers.
{"title":"Transcriptional control by enhancers: working remotely for improved performance.","authors":"Joaquin M Espinosa","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2020.1724673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2020.1724673","url":null,"abstract":"Completion of the Human Genome Project almost twenty years ago produced a humbling surprise: biological complexity is driven not so much by the number of genes in a genome, but rather by increased regulatory diversity. The ability of multicellular organisms to turn genes on and off in various combinations not only drives the appearance of a cornucopia of differentiated cell types with vastly different functions, but also provides the capacity for homeostasis in a wide range of environmental conditions. Central to this increased regulatory capacity are DNA sequences that control gene activity. Among these, distal enhancer elements have captured the imagination of scientists since their initial discovery in 1983 [1–3], and their study continues to produce new mysteries. How do enhancers really work? How much of their action is driven by the mere binding of transcription factors? What are the roles of chromatin modifications and three-dimensional conformation in enhancer function? How about enhancer-derived RNAs (eRNAs)? Finding answers to these questions is not simply a basic science exercise, as genetic alterations leading to enhancer dysfunction, such as translocations, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and mutations are recognized sources of human variation, susceptibility to disease, and known drivers of cancer progression. Within this framework, in this issue of Transcription, we are glad to publish a series of reviews focused on enhancers. First, Lewis et al. get us started with a thorough and entertaining update on transcriptional control by enhancers and eRNAs[4]. Then, Cardiello et al. dive deeper into the fascinating world of eRNAs and other RNA species arising from regulatory elements identified by novel measurements of nascent RNA[5]. We then transition into the realm of chromatin, where Rahnamoun et al. report on the regulatory interplay between eRNAs, histone modifications, and epigenetic readers[6]. Next, Yao et al. provide an updated account of the role of enhancer reprogramming in tumorigenesis and cancer development[7]. Lastly, BarajasMora and Feeney discuss recent interesting results about the role of enhancers as organizers of chromatin configurations important for shaping the repertoire of immunoglobulins produced by VDJ recombination[8]. Altogether, this collection of reviews provides an important update on the state of the field, while also identifying new avenues of future research. We are grateful to all authors for their expert contributions, and hope that the readers of Transcription will treasure this issue focused on enhancers.","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2020.1724673","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37640431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-01Epub Date: 2019-12-11DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2019.1698934
Homa Rahnamoun, Paola Orozco, Shannon M Lauberth
Since the discovery that enhancers can support transcription, the roles of enhancer RNAs have remained largely elusive. We identified that enhancer RNAs interact with and augment bromodomain engagement with acetylated chromatin. Here, we discuss our recent findings and the potential mechanisms underlying the regulation and functions of enhancer RNA-bromodomain associations.
{"title":"The role of enhancer RNAs in epigenetic regulation of gene expression.","authors":"Homa Rahnamoun, Paola Orozco, Shannon M Lauberth","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2019.1698934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2019.1698934","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the discovery that enhancers can support transcription, the roles of enhancer RNAs have remained largely elusive. We identified that enhancer RNAs interact with and augment bromodomain engagement with acetylated chromatin. Here, we discuss our recent findings and the potential mechanisms underlying the regulation and functions of enhancer RNA-bromodomain associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":"11 1","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21541264.2019.1698934","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37446102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}