首页 > 最新文献

Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Scoping Review and First Asian Case Series 磁括约肌增强术治疗袖胃切除术后胃食管反流:一项范围回顾和首次亚洲病例系列。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70238
Marcus Yeow, Jimmy Bok Yan So, Javis Fung, Daryl Kai Ann Chia, Asim Shabbir

Introduction

Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) has emerged as a possible surgical option in patients with gastroesophageal reflux following sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The published literature primarily originates from Western populations, with no reported cases outside the U.S. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature on the use of MSA for treating gastroesophageal reflux after SG and analyze our institution's experience.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus was conducted from inception to 3 May 2025 to identify studies describing the use of MSA for gastroesophageal reflux following SG. Additionally, all consecutive patients who underwent MSA implantation for gastroesophageal reflux following SG between June 2019 and December 2023 were identified from our institution's database.

Results

The scoping review identified eight studies from the U.S., reporting on 108 patients. More than half of these patients no longer required daily PPI use after MSA implantation. Compared to pre-MSA GERD-HRQL scores, which ranged from 17.1 to 46.0, post-MSA scores were lower, ranging from 4.1 to 19.0. This first Asian case series included seven patients and found that, following MSA implantation, six out of seven continued to report daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. The mean pre-MSA Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease–Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score was 44.4, and the mean modified DeMeester symptom score was 4.1. These improved to 31.4 (p = 0.06) and 3.0 (p = 0.27), respectively, post-MSA. No MSA-related adverse events were recorded.

Conclusion

While the scoping review suggested that MSA may lead to symptomatic improvement in selected patients with gastroesophageal reflux following SG, this is based on low-level evidence. Our case series showed that only modest symptom improvements were observed following MSA for the treatment of reflux after SG in the Asian population.

简介:磁性括约肌增强术(MSA)已成为套管胃切除术(SG)后胃食管反流患者的一种可能的手术选择。已发表的文献主要来自西方人群,未见美国以外的病例报道。本研究的目的是回顾目前关于使用MSA治疗SG后胃食管反流的文献,并分析本机构的经验。方法:对PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane和Scopus进行文献检索,从开始到2025年5月3日,以确定描述使用MSA治疗SG后胃食管反流的研究。此外,2019年6月至2023年12月期间,所有因SG后胃食管反流而连续接受MSA植入的患者均从我们机构的数据库中确定。结果:范围审查确定了来自美国的8项研究,报告了108例患者。这些患者中有一半以上在MSA植入后不再需要每日使用PPI。与msa前的GERD-HRQL评分(17.1 ~ 46.0)相比,msa后的评分较低,为4.1 ~ 19.0。第一个亚洲病例系列包括7名患者,发现在MSA植入后,7名患者中有6名继续报告每日使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。msa前胃食管反流疾病-健康相关生活质量(GERD-HRQL)平均评分为44.4,平均改良DeMeester症状评分为4.1。msa后分别提高到31.4 (p = 0.06)和3.0 (p = 0.27)。无msa相关不良事件记录。结论:虽然范围综述提示MSA可能导致SG后胃食管反流患者的症状改善,但这是基于低水平的证据。我们的病例系列显示,在亚洲人群中,采用MSA治疗SG后反流的症状只有适度改善。
{"title":"Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Scoping Review and First Asian Case Series","authors":"Marcus Yeow,&nbsp;Jimmy Bok Yan So,&nbsp;Javis Fung,&nbsp;Daryl Kai Ann Chia,&nbsp;Asim Shabbir","doi":"10.1111/ases.70238","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70238","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) has emerged as a possible surgical option in patients with gastroesophageal reflux following sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The published literature primarily originates from Western populations, with no reported cases outside the U.S. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature on the use of MSA for treating gastroesophageal reflux after SG and analyze our institution's experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus was conducted from inception to 3 May 2025 to identify studies describing the use of MSA for gastroesophageal reflux following SG. Additionally, all consecutive patients who underwent MSA implantation for gastroesophageal reflux following SG between June 2019 and December 2023 were identified from our institution's database.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The scoping review identified eight studies from the U.S., reporting on 108 patients. More than half of these patients no longer required daily PPI use after MSA implantation. Compared to pre-MSA GERD-HRQL scores, which ranged from 17.1 to 46.0, post-MSA scores were lower, ranging from 4.1 to 19.0. This first Asian case series included seven patients and found that, following MSA implantation, six out of seven continued to report daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. The mean pre-MSA Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease–Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score was 44.4, and the mean modified DeMeester symptom score was 4.1. These improved to 31.4 (<i>p</i> = 0.06) and 3.0 (<i>p</i> = 0.27), respectively, post-MSA. No MSA-related adverse events were recorded.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While the scoping review suggested that MSA may lead to symptomatic improvement in selected patients with gastroesophageal reflux following SG, this is based on low-level evidence. Our case series showed that only modest symptom improvements were observed following MSA for the treatment of reflux after SG in the Asian population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Porcine Model for Training Novices in Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach 训练新手经口内窥镜甲状腺切除术前庭入路的猪模型。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70232
Lei Min, Yujing Weng, Yanhong Miao, Zhiheng Huang

Background

Historically, live pigs have been utilized for technical exploration in developing the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA). This study aims to design a TOETVA training model using porcine subjects for junior doctors.

Methods

Trainees from hospitals across China were invited to participate in a TOETVA training workshop. We documented the duration of each procedural step, surgical complications, and specific details, which were then compared to the initial human TOETVA procedures conducted by specialists from our institution. After the workshop, participants completed online questionnaires using a 1–5 Likert Scale to assess their subjective experiences of each step in comparison to human procedures.

Results

The study involved 17 trainees and seven mentors from institutions in four Chinese cities, using five pigs for the workshop. All five surgeries were successfully completed, although there was a loss of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) signal in one case. Remarkably, one trainee successfully performed their first human TOETVA 3 days after the workshop. The overall complication rates were comparable between the porcine TOETVAs and human procedures (20.0% vs. 11.4%, p > 0.999). Participants rated the training on assistance in performing human TOETVA between 3.54 ± 1.18 and 4.29 ± 0.55 on the Likert Scale. In terms of similarity to human TOETVA, steps such as establishing working space, identifying RLNs, and dissecting central lymph nodes were rated above 3.

Conclusion

This study is the first to confirm the feasibility of a porcine TOETVA training model. Despite anatomical differences, the porcine TOETVA effectively simulates human procedures.

背景:历史上,生猪被用于开发经口内窥镜甲状腺切除术前庭入路(TOETVA)的技术探索。本研究旨在设计以猪为主体的初级医师TOETVA训练模型。方法:邀请来自全国各医院的受训者参加TOETVA培训工作坊。我们记录了每个手术步骤的持续时间、手术并发症和具体细节,然后与我们机构的专家进行的最初的人类TOETVA手术进行比较。研讨会结束后,参与者使用1-5李克特量表完成在线问卷,以评估他们对每个步骤的主观体验,并将其与人类程序进行比较。结果:该研究涉及来自中国4个城市的机构的17名学员和7名导师,使用5头猪进行工作坊。所有五例手术均成功完成,尽管有一例喉返神经(RLN)信号丢失。值得注意的是,一名学员在培训3天后成功地完成了他们的第一次人体TOETVA。猪TOETVAs和人手术的总并发症发生率相当(20.0% vs. 11.4%, p < 0 0.999)。在李克特量表上,参与者对协助执行人类TOETVA的培训的评分在3.54±1.18和4.29±0.55之间。在与人类TOETVA的相似度方面,建立工作空间、识别RLNs、解剖中央淋巴结等步骤被评为3级以上。结论:本研究首次证实了猪TOETVA训练模型的可行性。尽管解剖学上存在差异,但猪的TOETVA有效地模拟了人类的手术过程。
{"title":"A Porcine Model for Training Novices in Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach","authors":"Lei Min,&nbsp;Yujing Weng,&nbsp;Yanhong Miao,&nbsp;Zhiheng Huang","doi":"10.1111/ases.70232","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70232","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Historically, live pigs have been utilized for technical exploration in developing the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA). This study aims to design a TOETVA training model using porcine subjects for junior doctors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Trainees from hospitals across China were invited to participate in a TOETVA training workshop. We documented the duration of each procedural step, surgical complications, and specific details, which were then compared to the initial human TOETVA procedures conducted by specialists from our institution. After the workshop, participants completed online questionnaires using a 1–5 Likert Scale to assess their subjective experiences of each step in comparison to human procedures.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study involved 17 trainees and seven mentors from institutions in four Chinese cities, using five pigs for the workshop. All five surgeries were successfully completed, although there was a loss of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) signal in one case. Remarkably, one trainee successfully performed their first human TOETVA 3 days after the workshop. The overall complication rates were comparable between the porcine TOETVAs and human procedures (20.0% vs. 11.4%, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.999). Participants rated the training on assistance in performing human TOETVA between 3.54 ± 1.18 and 4.29 ± 0.55 on the Likert Scale. In terms of similarity to human TOETVA, steps such as establishing working space, identifying RLNs, and dissecting central lymph nodes were rated above 3.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study is the first to confirm the feasibility of a porcine TOETVA training model. Despite anatomical differences, the porcine TOETVA effectively simulates human procedures.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scarless Sterilization? A Comparative Study of Vaginal Notes and Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation 无疤灭菌吗?阴道笔记与腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的比较研究。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70236
Ayşe Betül Albayrak Denizli, Eralp Bulutlar, Gizem Boz İzceyhan, Narin Ece Rol, Sadık Şahin

Background

Tubal ligation is a common permanent contraception method. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) offers a scarless alternative to laparoscopy, but comparative evidence for interval tubal ligation is limited.

Objective

To compare surgical outcomes and recovery between vNOTES and conventional laparoscopic tubal ligation.

Methods

Retrospective cohort at a tertiary center (August 2024–May 2025). Women aged 30–50 seeking permanent contraception with ASA ≤ 3 were included. Exclusions: prior pelvic surgery or known pelvic pathology, salpingectomy or non-contraceptive indications (e.g., hydrosalpinx), concomitant procedures, incomplete records. Patients were grouped by technique: vNOTES (n = 20) or laparoscopy (n = 27). Outcomes: operative time, hospital stay, time to mobilization, analgesia use, Δhemoglobin/Δhematocrit, complications. Tests: t-test/Mann–Whitney, Chi-square/Fisher; effect sizes (Cohen's d) and 95% CIs reported (α = 0.05).

Results

Baseline demographics were comparable. Operative time did not differ (mean difference −3.77 min, 95% CI −9.70 to 2.15; p = 0.199; d = −0.32). vNOTES was associated with shorter hospitalization (−3.40 h, 95% CI −6.51 to −0.29; p = 0.033; d = 0.47), earlier mobilization (−0.80 h, 95% CI −1.27 to −0.33; p < 0.001; d = 0.94), and lower postoperative analgesia use (−1.05 doses, 95% CI −1.48 to −0.63; p < 0.001; d = 1.55). Changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit were similar (both p > 0.40). One vNOTES case required conversion to laparoscopy due to adhesions; no conversions occurred in the laparoscopy group.

Conclusions

vNOTES and laparoscopy are both safe for interval tubal ligation. vNOTES confers clinically meaningful recovery advantages—shorter hospitalization, faster mobilization, and reduced analgesic need—while maintaining comparable operative time and blood loss surrogates. These findings support vNOTES as a promising, patient-centered alternative.

背景:输卵管结扎是一种常见的永久性避孕方法。阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)提供了一种无疤痕的腹腔镜手术,但间隔输卵管结扎的比较证据有限。目的:比较vNOTES与传统腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的手术效果和恢复情况。方法:回顾性队列在三级中心(2024年8月- 2025年5月)。纳入ASA≤3、寻求永久避孕的30-50岁女性。排除:既往盆腔手术或已知盆腔病理,输卵管切除术或非避孕指征(如输卵管积水),伴随手术,记录不完整。患者按技术分组:vNOTES (n = 20)或腹腔镜(n = 27)。结果:手术时间、住院时间、活动时间、镇痛使用、Δhemoglobin/Δhematocrit、并发症。检验:t检验/Mann-Whitney、卡方检验/Fisher;效应量(Cohen’s d)和95% ci报告(α = 0.05)。结果:基线人口统计学具有可比性。手术时间无差异(平均差-3.77 min, 95% CI -9.70 ~ 2.15; p = 0.199; d = -0.32)。vNOTES与较短的住院时间(-3.40 h, 95% CI -6.51至-0.29;p = 0.033; d = 0.47)和较早的活动(-0.80 h, 95% CI -1.27至-0.33;p = 0.40)相关。1例vNOTES病例因粘连需要转为腹腔镜检查;腹腔镜组未发生转换。结论:vNOTES和腹腔镜在间歇输卵管结扎中均是安全的。vNOTES具有临床意义的恢复优势-更短的住院时间,更快的活动,减少镇痛需求-同时保持相当的手术时间和出血量。这些发现支持vNOTES作为一个有希望的、以患者为中心的替代方案。
{"title":"Scarless Sterilization? A Comparative Study of Vaginal Notes and Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation","authors":"Ayşe Betül Albayrak Denizli,&nbsp;Eralp Bulutlar,&nbsp;Gizem Boz İzceyhan,&nbsp;Narin Ece Rol,&nbsp;Sadık Şahin","doi":"10.1111/ases.70236","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70236","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Tubal ligation is a common permanent contraception method. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) offers a scarless alternative to laparoscopy, but comparative evidence for interval tubal ligation is limited.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To compare surgical outcomes and recovery between vNOTES and conventional laparoscopic tubal ligation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Retrospective cohort at a tertiary center (August 2024–May 2025). Women aged 30–50 seeking permanent contraception with ASA ≤ 3 were included. Exclusions: prior pelvic surgery or known pelvic pathology, salpingectomy or non-contraceptive indications (e.g., hydrosalpinx), concomitant procedures, incomplete records. Patients were grouped by technique: vNOTES (<i>n</i> = 20) or laparoscopy (<i>n</i> = 27). Outcomes: operative time, hospital stay, time to mobilization, analgesia use, Δhemoglobin/Δhematocrit, complications. Tests: t-test/Mann–Whitney, Chi-square/Fisher; effect sizes (Cohen's d) and 95% CIs reported (<i>α</i> = 0.05).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Baseline demographics were comparable. Operative time did not differ (mean difference −3.77 min, 95% CI −9.70 to 2.15; <i>p</i> = 0.199; d = −0.32). vNOTES was associated with shorter hospitalization (−3.40 h, 95% CI −6.51 to −0.29; <i>p</i> = 0.033; d = 0.47), earlier mobilization (−0.80 h, 95% CI −1.27 to −0.33; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; d = 0.94), and lower postoperative analgesia use (−1.05 doses, 95% CI −1.48 to −0.63; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; d = 1.55). Changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit were similar (both <i>p</i> &gt; 0.40). One vNOTES case required conversion to laparoscopy due to adhesions; no conversions occurred in the laparoscopy group.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>vNOTES and laparoscopy are both safe for interval tubal ligation. vNOTES confers clinically meaningful recovery advantages—shorter hospitalization, faster mobilization, and reduced analgesic need—while maintaining comparable operative time and blood loss surrogates. These findings support vNOTES as a promising, patient-centered alternative.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comments on: Clinical Impacts of Minimally Invasive Transperineal Abdominoperineal Resection in Crohn's Disease 微创经会阴腹会阴切除术治疗克罗恩病的临床效果
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70215
Nabil Mohammad Azmi, Mohd Firdaus Mohd Hayati, Zairul Azwan Mohd Azman, Ismail Sagap
{"title":"Comments on: Clinical Impacts of Minimally Invasive Transperineal Abdominoperineal Resection in Crohn's Disease","authors":"Nabil Mohammad Azmi,&nbsp;Mohd Firdaus Mohd Hayati,&nbsp;Zairul Azwan Mohd Azman,&nbsp;Ismail Sagap","doi":"10.1111/ases.70215","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70215","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biliary Reconstruction for Intrahepatic Bile Duct Strictures and Optimal Jejunal Limb Length in Congenital Biliary Dilation Surgery: A Literature Review and Consensus Statements From the AOB Consensus Meeting 先天性胆道扩张手术中肝内胆管狭窄的胆道重建和最佳空肠肢体长度:文献综述和AOB共识会议的共识声明。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-11 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70204
Masahiro Takeda, Hiroki Mori, Tetsuya Idichi, Takahisa Tainaka, So Nakamura, Yuichiro Miyake, Go Miyano, Atsuyuki Yamataka, Yoshitaka Kiya, Toshiharu Matsuura, Toshiya Abe, Kenoki Ohuchida, Kohei Nakata, Takao Ohtsuka, Hiroki Ishibashi, Hiroyuki Koga, Yuichi Nagakawa, Tatsuro Tajiri, Masafumi Nakamura, Yuko Kitagawa, Hiroo Uchida

Introduction

With the aim of facilitating cross-specialty discussion on detailed anatomical interpretations in congenital biliary dilatation surgery, the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (JSES) and the Consensus Meeting of Anatomy on the Border (AOB) developed a series of consensus statements in 2024. This report focuses specifically on biliary reconstruction for intrahepatic bile duct strictures and the optimal jejunal limb length.

Methods

These statements were based on a comprehensive literature review and a nationwide questionnaire survey.

Results

For intrahepatic bile duct strictures, the need to tailor surgical approaches according to the location and underlying cause of the stricture has been recognized. When a stricture was located in the hilar or proximal intrahepatic bile ducts and direct surgical intervention was feasible, procedures such as stricture repair, membranous resection, or septal excision were commonly performed. In contrast, when the stricture was located more peripherally and direct intervention was difficult, alternative strategies, such as hepatectomy, endoscopic bile duct reconstruction, or additional hepaticojejunostomy to the upstream bile duct, were employed. For the optimal length of the jejunal limb, it is recommended that the jejunal limb length be adjusted according to body size in children under 5 years of age, and that the natural length be applied in children 5 years of age and older, as well as in adults.

Conclusion

The current evidence remains insufficient and further research is warranted to establish more definitive conclusions. This statement was finalized with the agreement of all expert panel members.

导言:为了促进先天性胆道扩张手术中详细解剖解释的跨专业讨论,日本内窥镜外科学会(JSES)和边界解剖共识会议(AOB)于2024年制定了一系列共识声明。本报告特别关注肝内胆管狭窄的胆道重建和最佳空肠肢体长度。方法:这些陈述是基于全面的文献综述和全国范围内的问卷调查。结果:对于肝内胆管狭窄,需要根据狭窄的位置和潜在原因量身定制手术入路。当狭窄位于肝门或肝内胆管近端且可直接手术干预时,通常进行狭窄修复、膜切除或间隔切除等手术。相比之下,当狭窄位于更外围且难以直接干预时,则采用其他策略,如肝切除术、内镜胆管重建或在上游胆管上附加肝空肠吻合术。对于空肠肢体的最佳长度,建议5岁以下儿童根据体型调整空肠肢体长度,5岁及以上儿童适用自然长度,成人也适用。结论:目前的证据仍然不足,需要进一步的研究来建立更明确的结论。本声明经专家小组全体成员同意定稿。
{"title":"Biliary Reconstruction for Intrahepatic Bile Duct Strictures and Optimal Jejunal Limb Length in Congenital Biliary Dilation Surgery: A Literature Review and Consensus Statements From the AOB Consensus Meeting","authors":"Masahiro Takeda,&nbsp;Hiroki Mori,&nbsp;Tetsuya Idichi,&nbsp;Takahisa Tainaka,&nbsp;So Nakamura,&nbsp;Yuichiro Miyake,&nbsp;Go Miyano,&nbsp;Atsuyuki Yamataka,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Kiya,&nbsp;Toshiharu Matsuura,&nbsp;Toshiya Abe,&nbsp;Kenoki Ohuchida,&nbsp;Kohei Nakata,&nbsp;Takao Ohtsuka,&nbsp;Hiroki Ishibashi,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Koga,&nbsp;Yuichi Nagakawa,&nbsp;Tatsuro Tajiri,&nbsp;Masafumi Nakamura,&nbsp;Yuko Kitagawa,&nbsp;Hiroo Uchida","doi":"10.1111/ases.70204","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70204","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>With the aim of facilitating cross-specialty discussion on detailed anatomical interpretations in congenital biliary dilatation surgery, the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (JSES) and the Consensus Meeting of Anatomy on the Border (AOB) developed a series of consensus statements in 2024. This report focuses specifically on biliary reconstruction for intrahepatic bile duct strictures and the optimal jejunal limb length.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These statements were based on a comprehensive literature review and a nationwide questionnaire survey.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>For intrahepatic bile duct strictures, the need to tailor surgical approaches according to the location and underlying cause of the stricture has been recognized. When a stricture was located in the hilar or proximal intrahepatic bile ducts and direct surgical intervention was feasible, procedures such as stricture repair, membranous resection, or septal excision were commonly performed. In contrast, when the stricture was located more peripherally and direct intervention was difficult, alternative strategies, such as hepatectomy, endoscopic bile duct reconstruction, or additional hepaticojejunostomy to the upstream bile duct, were employed. For the optimal length of the jejunal limb, it is recommended that the jejunal limb length be adjusted according to body size in children under 5 years of age, and that the natural length be applied in children 5 years of age and older, as well as in adults.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The current evidence remains insufficient and further research is warranted to establish more definitive conclusions. This statement was finalized with the agreement of all expert panel members.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12790982/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consensus Statement on the Timing of Median Arcuate Ligament Release in Patients With Pancreaticoduodenal or Gastroduodenal Artery Aneurysms Associated With Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome 关于胰十二指肠或胃十二指肠动脉瘤伴中弓韧带综合征患者中弓韧带释放时机的共识声明。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-11 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70200
Tomotaka Ueno, Toshio Takayama, Saya Chiba, Toshiya Abe, Kenoki Ouchida, Shunji Endo, Noboru Ideno, Katsuyuki Hoshina, Hidenori Haruta, Masaharu Higashida, Naoki Ikenaga, Yasunaru Sakuma, Masafumi Nakamura, Yuko Kitagawa, Akiko Umezawa

Introduction

Pancreaticoduodenal and gastroduodenal artery aneurysms (PDAA and GDAA) are rare but life-threatening vascular lesions. Many are associated with median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), a condition associated with increased retrograde collateral flow due to celiac artery compression. Although endovascular treatment is the first-line approach for PDAA and GDAA, the role and timing of median arcuate ligament (MAL) release remain unclear.

Methods

This consensus statement was developed through the Anatomy on the Border Expert Consensus Meeting, organized by the Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Among multiple clinical questions (CQs) addressed by the working group, this statement focuses on CQ3: the appropriate timing of MAL release in patients with PDAA or GDAA associated with MALS. Consensus statements were developed based on a literature review, a nationwide survey, expert panel discussions, and a modified Delphi voting process.

Results

Although evidence remains limited, MAL release may improve antegrade visceral perfusion, prevent ischemic complications, reduce retrograde hemodynamic stress and recurrence risk, and facilitate vascular access for future interventions. Based on current evidence and expert input, the committee developed and approved three consensus statements: MAL release could be considered before endovascular treatment in clinically stable cases; Endovascular treatment should be performed first in ruptured cases, with careful attention to end-organ ischemia; Elective MAL release is suggested after aneurysm treatment to reduce the risk of recurrence.

Conclusion

These consensus statements support individualized surgical decision-making for patients with PDAA or GDAA associated with MALS, where evidence is limited and clinical practice varies.

胰十二指肠和胃十二指肠动脉瘤(PDAA和GDAA)是一种罕见但危及生命的血管病变。许多与正中弓状韧带综合征(MALS)有关,这是一种由于腹腔动脉压迫导致逆行侧支血流增加的疾病。尽管血管内治疗是PDAA和GDAA的一线治疗方法,但正中弓状韧带(MAL)释放的作用和时间尚不清楚。方法:本共识声明是通过由日本内窥镜外科学会组织的边界解剖学专家共识会议制定的。在工作组处理的多个临床问题(cq)中,本声明侧重于CQ3: PDAA或GDAA合并MALS患者MAL释放的适当时机。共识声明是基于文献综述、全国调查、专家小组讨论和改进的德尔菲投票程序而制定的。结果:尽管证据有限,但MAL释放可以改善顺行内脏灌注,预防缺血性并发症,减少逆行血流动力学应激和复发风险,并为未来干预提供血管通路。根据目前的证据和专家意见,委员会制定并批准了三项共识声明:在临床稳定的病例中,在血管内治疗之前可以考虑释放MAL;破裂病例应首先进行血管内治疗,并注意末器官缺血;建议在动脉瘤治疗后选择性地释放MAL以减少复发的风险。结论:这些共识声明支持PDAA或GDAA合并MALS患者的个体化手术决策,其中证据有限且临床实践不同。
{"title":"Consensus Statement on the Timing of Median Arcuate Ligament Release in Patients With Pancreaticoduodenal or Gastroduodenal Artery Aneurysms Associated With Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome","authors":"Tomotaka Ueno,&nbsp;Toshio Takayama,&nbsp;Saya Chiba,&nbsp;Toshiya Abe,&nbsp;Kenoki Ouchida,&nbsp;Shunji Endo,&nbsp;Noboru Ideno,&nbsp;Katsuyuki Hoshina,&nbsp;Hidenori Haruta,&nbsp;Masaharu Higashida,&nbsp;Naoki Ikenaga,&nbsp;Yasunaru Sakuma,&nbsp;Masafumi Nakamura,&nbsp;Yuko Kitagawa,&nbsp;Akiko Umezawa","doi":"10.1111/ases.70200","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70200","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pancreaticoduodenal and gastroduodenal artery aneurysms (PDAA and GDAA) are rare but life-threatening vascular lesions. Many are associated with median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), a condition associated with increased retrograde collateral flow due to celiac artery compression. Although endovascular treatment is the first-line approach for PDAA and GDAA, the role and timing of median arcuate ligament (MAL) release remain unclear.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This consensus statement was developed through the Anatomy on the Border Expert Consensus Meeting, organized by the Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Among multiple clinical questions (CQs) addressed by the working group, this statement focuses on CQ3: the appropriate timing of MAL release in patients with PDAA or GDAA associated with MALS. Consensus statements were developed based on a literature review, a nationwide survey, expert panel discussions, and a modified Delphi voting process.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although evidence remains limited, MAL release may improve antegrade visceral perfusion, prevent ischemic complications, reduce retrograde hemodynamic stress and recurrence risk, and facilitate vascular access for future interventions. Based on current evidence and expert input, the committee developed and approved three consensus statements: MAL release could be considered before endovascular treatment in clinically stable cases; Endovascular treatment should be performed first in ruptured cases, with careful attention to end-organ ischemia; Elective MAL release is suggested after aneurysm treatment to reduce the risk of recurrence.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These consensus statements support individualized surgical decision-making for patients with PDAA or GDAA associated with MALS, where evidence is limited and clinical practice varies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12790981/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
One-Stage Totally Extraperitoneal Mesh Repair for Incarcerated Groin Hernias With Separated Operative Fields 腹股沟嵌顿疝手术野分离一期全腹膜外补片修复术。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-11 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70233
Mamoru Miyasaka, Yo Kawarada, Yuki Okawa, Sho Sekiya, Toshihiro Kushibiki, Daisuke Saikawa, Koichi Teramura, Satoshi Hayashi, Yoshinori Suzuki, Masaya Kawada, Shuji Kitashiro, Kichizo Kaga, Shunichi Okushiba, Satoshi Hirano

Introduction

Incarcerated groin hernia is a challenging emergency, and the optimal surgical approach—particularly regarding mesh use when bowel resection is required—remains controversial.

Operative Technique

We retrospectively reviewed 13 patients who underwent emergency repair of incarcerated groin and obturator hernias using a standardized laparoscopy-assisted totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique with separated operative fields. Diagnostic laparoscopy was used for inspection and reduction, followed by single-incision plus one-port TEP mesh repair, and re-laparoscopy for bowel assessment. When necessary, bowel resection was performed through an extended umbilical incision, maintaining field separation. Thirteen patients were treated with this approach, which allowed one-stage mesh repair even in cases requiring bowel resection.

Discussion

This combined intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach enables safe one-stage mesh repair even when bowel resection is required by minimizing contamination risk through spatial separation. The technique may expand the applicability of TEP in emergency settings.

腹股沟嵌顿疝是一种具有挑战性的紧急情况,最佳的手术方法-特别是当需要肠切除术时使用补片-仍然存在争议。手术技术:我们回顾性回顾了13例采用标准腹腔镜辅助全腹膜外(TEP)技术分离手术野的腹股沟嵌顿疝和闭孔疝急诊修复术的患者。诊断性腹腔镜检查复位,单切口加单口TEP补片修复,再次腹腔镜检查肠道评估。必要时,通过延长脐切口进行肠切除术,保持肠野分离。13例患者采用这种方法治疗,即使在需要肠切除术的病例中也允许一期补片修复。讨论:这种腹膜内和腹膜外联合入路即使需要肠切除术,也可以通过空间分离最小化污染风险,实现安全的一期补片修复。该技术可以扩大TEP在紧急情况下的适用性。
{"title":"One-Stage Totally Extraperitoneal Mesh Repair for Incarcerated Groin Hernias With Separated Operative Fields","authors":"Mamoru Miyasaka,&nbsp;Yo Kawarada,&nbsp;Yuki Okawa,&nbsp;Sho Sekiya,&nbsp;Toshihiro Kushibiki,&nbsp;Daisuke Saikawa,&nbsp;Koichi Teramura,&nbsp;Satoshi Hayashi,&nbsp;Yoshinori Suzuki,&nbsp;Masaya Kawada,&nbsp;Shuji Kitashiro,&nbsp;Kichizo Kaga,&nbsp;Shunichi Okushiba,&nbsp;Satoshi Hirano","doi":"10.1111/ases.70233","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70233","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Incarcerated groin hernia is a challenging emergency, and the optimal surgical approach—particularly regarding mesh use when bowel resection is required—remains controversial.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Operative Technique</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We retrospectively reviewed 13 patients who underwent emergency repair of incarcerated groin and obturator hernias using a standardized laparoscopy-assisted totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique with separated operative fields. Diagnostic laparoscopy was used for inspection and reduction, followed by single-incision plus one-port TEP mesh repair, and re-laparoscopy for bowel assessment. When necessary, bowel resection was performed through an extended umbilical incision, maintaining field separation. Thirteen patients were treated with this approach, which allowed one-stage mesh repair even in cases requiring bowel resection.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This combined intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach enables safe one-stage mesh repair even when bowel resection is required by minimizing contamination risk through spatial separation. The technique may expand the applicability of TEP in emergency settings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Favorable Impact of Cost-Conscious Robotic Colectomy on Hospital Gross Profit: A Retrospective Cohort Study 具有成本意识的机器人结肠切除术对医院毛利润的有利影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70235
Susumu Inamoto, Tsutomu Morishita, Tomoaki Okada, Akinari Nomura, Yoshiharu Sakai

Introduction

In Japan, rising healthcare costs and hospital deficits require both systemic reforms and institutional efforts to reduce expenditure. Robotic surgery has been increasingly adopted owing to its precision and stability, and insurance coverage for colectomies began in April 2022. Nonetheless, the high cost and maintenance of robotic instruments have substantially reduced the hospital gross profit. We previously reported that robotic colectomy decreased the gross profit by approximately JPY 212 000 compared with laparoscopic colectomy.

Methods

To address this issue, we implemented a hybrid robotic colectomy technique incorporating the double bipolar method and using laparoscopic coagulating shears instead of robotic advanced energy devices. Additionally, bowel transection and anastomosis were performed by an assistant using a laparoscopic stapler.

Results

Standardization of the surgical procedure contributed to reduced operative time. Comparisons before and after the introduction of this strategy revealed no significant differences in clinical or oncological factors or short-term outcomes. However, the operative time was significantly reduced, and the gross profit improved by approximately JPY 120 000. This improvement resulted from lower material and labor costs, with the latter being due to the shorter operative time.

Conclusion

Our experience highlights that cost reduction in robotic colectomy can be safely achieved without compromising clinical outcomes. Continued efforts to optimize surgical efficiency and cost-effectiveness will benefit patients and healthcare institutions.

在日本,不断上升的医疗成本和医院赤字需要系统改革和制度性努力来减少支出。机器人手术因其精确性和稳定性而被越来越多地采用,并且从2022年4月开始将结肠手术纳入保险范围。然而,机器人仪器的高成本和维护大大降低了医院的毛利润。我们先前报道,与腹腔镜结肠切除术相比,机器人结肠切除术减少了大约212,000日元的毛利润。方法:为了解决这个问题,我们实施了一种混合机器人结肠切除术技术,结合双极方法和使用腹腔镜凝固剪切代替机器人先进的能量装置。此外,肠横断和吻合由助手使用腹腔镜吻合器进行。结果:手术程序的规范化减少了手术时间。引入该策略前后的比较显示,在临床或肿瘤因素或短期结果方面没有显着差异。然而,手术时间大大缩短,毛利润提高了约12万日元。这种改进源于更低的材料和人工成本,后者是由于更短的操作时间。结论:我们的经验强调,机器人结肠切除术的成本降低可以在不影响临床结果的情况下安全实现。继续努力优化手术效率和成本效益将使患者和医疗机构受益。
{"title":"Favorable Impact of Cost-Conscious Robotic Colectomy on Hospital Gross Profit: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Susumu Inamoto,&nbsp;Tsutomu Morishita,&nbsp;Tomoaki Okada,&nbsp;Akinari Nomura,&nbsp;Yoshiharu Sakai","doi":"10.1111/ases.70235","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70235","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In Japan, rising healthcare costs and hospital deficits require both systemic reforms and institutional efforts to reduce expenditure. Robotic surgery has been increasingly adopted owing to its precision and stability, and insurance coverage for colectomies began in April 2022. Nonetheless, the high cost and maintenance of robotic instruments have substantially reduced the hospital gross profit. We previously reported that robotic colectomy decreased the gross profit by approximately JPY 212 000 compared with laparoscopic colectomy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To address this issue, we implemented a hybrid robotic colectomy technique incorporating the double bipolar method and using laparoscopic coagulating shears instead of robotic advanced energy devices. Additionally, bowel transection and anastomosis were performed by an assistant using a laparoscopic stapler.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Standardization of the surgical procedure contributed to reduced operative time. Comparisons before and after the introduction of this strategy revealed no significant differences in clinical or oncological factors or short-term outcomes. However, the operative time was significantly reduced, and the gross profit improved by approximately JPY 120 000. This improvement resulted from lower material and labor costs, with the latter being due to the shorter operative time.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our experience highlights that cost reduction in robotic colectomy can be safely achieved without compromising clinical outcomes. Continued efforts to optimize surgical efficiency and cost-effectiveness will benefit patients and healthcare institutions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145946645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reverse Needle Driving via Umbilical Trocar: An Effective Technique for Treating Recto-Bulbar Urethral Fistula in Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectoplasty 经脐套管针反向穿刺:腹腔镜辅助肛肠成形术治疗直肠-球尿道瘘的有效方法。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70231
Toshio Harumatsu, Koshiro Sugita, Masakazu Murakami, Ayaka Nagano, Yumiko Tabata, Yumiko Iwamoto, Lynne Takada, Nanako Nishida, Chihiro Kedoin, Yudai Tsuruno, Keisuke Yano, Shun Onishi, Koji Yamada, Waka Yamada, Takafumi Kawano, Satoshi Ieiri

Introduction

Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for recto-bulbar urethral fistula (RBUF) has not become standard practice because of the risk of urethral injury and incomplete fistula removal in the deep pelvic space. We herein report an effective technique for treating recto-bulbar fistula, called “Reverse needle driving via umbilical trocar” in LAARP.

Patient and Surgical Technique

The patient was diagnosed with RUBF by distal colostogram, and LAARP was planned to be performed. A 5-mm trocar was inserted at the umbilicus and three additional trocars were inserted. The surgeon stands on the right side of the patient and performs anorectoplasty. The RUBF was ligated with a trans-fixing suture of 4–0 absorbable monofilament that passed through the fistula tract using reverse needle driving with the surgeon's left hand. Since the surgeon's left-hand forceps are inserted through the umbilical trocar, which is located in the midline, the suture could be reliably placed just below the urethra by performing reverse left needle driving in a straight line through the umbilical trocar, confirmed with a urethroscope. After transection of the fistula, the rectum was pulled through and the stump was sutured to the perineal skin to construct the neo-anus. Postoperative imaging revealed complete fistula closure, without complications.

Discussion

This technique addresses the traditional challenges of urethral injury risk and incomplete fistula removal by utilizing strategic umbilical trocar positioning combined with flexible urethroscope confirmation. This robust RUBF technique represents an effective and safe approach for treating RUBF in LAARP.

导言:腹腔镜辅助肛门直肠成形术(LAARP)治疗直肠-球尿道瘘(RBUF)尚未成为标准做法,因为存在尿道损伤和盆腔深腔瘘管不完全切除的风险。我们在此报告一种治疗直肠-球瘘的有效技术,称为“通过脐带套管针反向驱动”。患者及手术技术:患者经远端结肠造影诊断为RUBF,拟行larp。在脐部插入一个5mm套管针,另外插入三个套管针。外科医生站在病人的右侧进行肛肠成形术。用4-0可吸收单丝穿刺术缝合RUBF,该单丝穿过瘘道,用外科医生的左手反向穿针。由于外科医生的左手钳子是通过位于中线的脐套管针插入的,因此通过脐套管针沿直线反向左针插入,可以可靠地将缝合线放置在尿道下方,并经尿道镜确认。切开瘘管后,将直肠拉出,将残端与会阴皮肤缝合,形成新肛门。术后影像学显示瘘管完全闭合,无并发症。讨论:该技术通过策略性脐套管针定位结合柔性输尿管镜确认,解决了尿道损伤风险和不完全切除瘘管的传统挑战。这种鲁棒性的RUBF技术代表了一种有效和安全的方法来治疗larp中的RUBF。
{"title":"Reverse Needle Driving via Umbilical Trocar: An Effective Technique for Treating Recto-Bulbar Urethral Fistula in Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectoplasty","authors":"Toshio Harumatsu,&nbsp;Koshiro Sugita,&nbsp;Masakazu Murakami,&nbsp;Ayaka Nagano,&nbsp;Yumiko Tabata,&nbsp;Yumiko Iwamoto,&nbsp;Lynne Takada,&nbsp;Nanako Nishida,&nbsp;Chihiro Kedoin,&nbsp;Yudai Tsuruno,&nbsp;Keisuke Yano,&nbsp;Shun Onishi,&nbsp;Koji Yamada,&nbsp;Waka Yamada,&nbsp;Takafumi Kawano,&nbsp;Satoshi Ieiri","doi":"10.1111/ases.70231","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70231","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for recto-bulbar urethral fistula (RBUF) has not become standard practice because of the risk of urethral injury and incomplete fistula removal in the deep pelvic space. We herein report an effective technique for treating recto-bulbar fistula, called “Reverse needle driving via umbilical trocar” in LAARP.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patient and Surgical Technique</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The patient was diagnosed with RUBF by distal colostogram, and LAARP was planned to be performed. A 5-mm trocar was inserted at the umbilicus and three additional trocars were inserted. The surgeon stands on the right side of the patient and performs anorectoplasty. The RUBF was ligated with a trans-fixing suture of 4–0 absorbable monofilament that passed through the fistula tract using reverse needle driving with the surgeon's left hand. Since the surgeon's left-hand forceps are inserted through the umbilical trocar, which is located in the midline, the suture could be reliably placed just below the urethra by performing reverse left needle driving in a straight line through the umbilical trocar, confirmed with a urethroscope. After transection of the fistula, the rectum was pulled through and the stump was sutured to the perineal skin to construct the neo-anus. Postoperative imaging revealed complete fistula closure, without complications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This technique addresses the traditional challenges of urethral injury risk and incomplete fistula removal by utilizing strategic umbilical trocar positioning combined with flexible urethroscope confirmation. This robust RUBF technique represents an effective and safe approach for treating RUBF in LAARP.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safe Trocar Placement by Transvaginal Endoscopic Insertion in Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer With Umbilical Incisional Hernia and Prior Mesh Repair: Two Case Reports 机器人辅助子宫内膜癌脐切口疝手术中经阴道内窥镜插入安全置入套管针及先前补片修复:两例报告。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70237
Takayuki Nagasawa, Nanako Jonai, Minami Oshikiri, Kazuyuki Murakami, Sho Sato, Yoshitaka Kaido, Hiroki Onoue, Masahiro Kagabu, Tadahiro Shoji, Tsukasa Baba

We report two cases of endometrial cancer with umbilical incisional hernia or prior mesh repair, in which robot-assisted surgery was safely performed using transvaginal laparoscope insertion. Both patients had prior abdominal surgeries, and preoperative imaging raised concerns about adhesions or mesh near the umbilicus, making conventional trocar insertion risky. A laparoscope was inserted via the posterior vaginal fornix, allowing real-time intra-abdominal visualization and safe port placement under direct vision. In one case, mesh and adhesions were confirmed at the umbilicus. In the other, no adhesions were found within the hernia sac despite being suspected preoperatively, whereas dense adhesions were identified at Palmer's point, which could not be fully characterized by imaging alone. These cases highlight the limitations of relying solely on imaging and underscore the utility of intraoperative visual assessment. Transvaginal scope insertion offers a simple, reproducible method to enhance trocar safety. To our knowledge, no previous reports have described this technique used solely for observation in robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer.

我们报告了两例子宫内膜癌合并脐切口疝或先前的补片修复,其中机器人辅助手术通过阴道腹腔镜插入安全地进行。这两名患者之前都进行过腹部手术,术前影像学检查引起了人们对脐部附近粘连或网状物的担忧,这使得传统的套管针插入存在风险。腹腔镜通过阴道后穹窿插入,可以在直接视觉下实时观察腹腔内和安全放置端口。在一个病例中,在脐部确认了补片和粘连。另一组尽管术前怀疑疝囊内未发现粘连,但在帕尔默点发现致密粘连,仅凭影像学不能完全表征。这些病例突出了单纯依靠影像学的局限性,强调了术中视觉评估的实用性。经阴道镜插入提供了一种简单、可重复的方法来提高套管针的安全性。据我们所知,以前没有报道将该技术单独用于子宫内膜癌机器人辅助手术的观察。
{"title":"Safe Trocar Placement by Transvaginal Endoscopic Insertion in Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer With Umbilical Incisional Hernia and Prior Mesh Repair: Two Case Reports","authors":"Takayuki Nagasawa,&nbsp;Nanako Jonai,&nbsp;Minami Oshikiri,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Murakami,&nbsp;Sho Sato,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Kaido,&nbsp;Hiroki Onoue,&nbsp;Masahiro Kagabu,&nbsp;Tadahiro Shoji,&nbsp;Tsukasa Baba","doi":"10.1111/ases.70237","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70237","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We report two cases of endometrial cancer with umbilical incisional hernia or prior mesh repair, in which robot-assisted surgery was safely performed using transvaginal laparoscope insertion. Both patients had prior abdominal surgeries, and preoperative imaging raised concerns about adhesions or mesh near the umbilicus, making conventional trocar insertion risky. A laparoscope was inserted via the posterior vaginal fornix, allowing real-time intra-abdominal visualization and safe port placement under direct vision. In one case, mesh and adhesions were confirmed at the umbilicus. In the other, no adhesions were found within the hernia sac despite being suspected preoperatively, whereas dense adhesions were identified at Palmer's point, which could not be fully characterized by imaging alone. These cases highlight the limitations of relying solely on imaging and underscore the utility of intraoperative visual assessment. Transvaginal scope insertion offers a simple, reproducible method to enhance trocar safety. To our knowledge, no previous reports have described this technique used solely for observation in robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1