Pub Date : 2024-02-29DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2024.2309373
Riccardo Zolea
In this paper an attempt is made to calculate the profit rate of the banking sector in the period following the 2007–2008 financial crisis, in order to compare it with that of other real productive...
{"title":"An estimation of the Italian banking sector profit rate in a crisis period","authors":"Riccardo Zolea","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2024.2309373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2024.2309373","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper an attempt is made to calculate the profit rate of the banking sector in the period following the 2007–2008 financial crisis, in order to compare it with that of other real productive...","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140005401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-22DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2284394
Joseph Chul-kyoo Jung
This study explores the impact of state’s industrial policy on sectoral capacity utilization and growth in total output in the context of the Korea’s Heavy and Chemical Industry (HCI) promotion (19...
{"title":"Sectoral dynamics of industrial policy in a two-sector economy: the case of Korea’s heavy and chemical industry (HCI) promotion (1973–1979)","authors":"Joseph Chul-kyoo Jung","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2284394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2284394","url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the impact of state’s industrial policy on sectoral capacity utilization and growth in total output in the context of the Korea’s Heavy and Chemical Industry (HCI) promotion (19...","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139020432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-30DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2284763
John T. Harvey, Khanh Pham
Neoclassical economists posted many mea culpas after they completely missed the Financial Crisis of 2008. Some heterodox schools of thought, however, claimed to have seen it coming. Among these wer...
{"title":"Austrian vs Post Keynesian explanations of the business cycle: an empirical examination","authors":"John T. Harvey, Khanh Pham","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2284763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2284763","url":null,"abstract":"Neoclassical economists posted many mea culpas after they completely missed the Financial Crisis of 2008. Some heterodox schools of thought, however, claimed to have seen it coming. Among these wer...","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"56 7-8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138512548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-30DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2286485
Loïck Tange
This paper examines the impact of the cost of labor on macroeconomic imbalances within the eurozone. For this purpose, we construct a three-country Stock-Flow Consistent (SFC) macroeconomic model i...
{"title":"Labor cost, competitiveness, and imbalances within the eurozone","authors":"Loïck Tange","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2286485","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2286485","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of the cost of labor on macroeconomic imbalances within the eurozone. For this purpose, we construct a three-country Stock-Flow Consistent (SFC) macroeconomic model i...","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"59 9-10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138512541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-13DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2275573
Chokri Zehri, Latifa Saleh Iben Ammar, Wissem Ajili Ben Youssef, Fatma Zehri
AbstractWe demonstrate that country-specific conditions and policies that can help manage the risks of excessive capital flows behave differently over time. Employing instrumental variable quantile regression estimates, our empirical methodology scrutinizes the projected distribution of portfolio inflows to emerging markets after an adverse international financial shock. This method enables us to differentiate the efficacy of policies and country-specific conditions in both the short and medium term. In the wake of a negative shock, our findings indicate that implementing more stringent capital controls is likely detrimental. In contrast, foreign exchange interventions and macroprudential policies prove beneficial in mitigating the risks associated with excessive inflows in the short and medium term. Notably, monetary policy cannot insulate economies from the risks of substantial capital inflows in the short or medium term. Furthermore, while institutional quality does not influence the risks in the short term, it can potentially reduce them in the medium term. We underscore the intertemporal tradeoffs associated with these policies, highlighting an aspect not considered in previous studies, which predominantly focused on the short-term impact.Keywords: Policy interventioncountry-specific conditionsfinancial shocks Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.Notes1 The short term refers to a period of two quarters, and the meduim term to eight quarters.2 We build on Ben Zeev (Citation2017) by assuming identical quarterly values equal to the corresponding annual values to transform annual capital control data into quarterly frequency. This assumption is strong, particularly for capital control indexes for which Fernández et al. (Citation2016) argue that these controls vary little over a year, have low standard deviations, and are highly acyclical in nature.3 Chinn and Ito (Citation2008) and Fernández et al. (Citation2016) indices capture “intensity” in the sense of how comprehensively capital flows are restricted. Besides, aggregate indices of capital controls may reflect a form of intensity of restrictions on capital movements across borders. For instance, Fernández et al. (Citation2016) show that an aggregate index of controls on capital inflows captures the evolution of actual tax rates on capital inflows in the emblematic case of Brazil in the late 2000s. Then, our conclusion continues to hold although that Chinn and Ito (Citation2008) and Fernández et al. (Citation2016) are ‘de jure’ indices.Additional informationFundingThis study is supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number [PSAU/2023/R/1444].
{"title":"The temporal dimensions of policy responses to capital surges","authors":"Chokri Zehri, Latifa Saleh Iben Ammar, Wissem Ajili Ben Youssef, Fatma Zehri","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2275573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2275573","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWe demonstrate that country-specific conditions and policies that can help manage the risks of excessive capital flows behave differently over time. Employing instrumental variable quantile regression estimates, our empirical methodology scrutinizes the projected distribution of portfolio inflows to emerging markets after an adverse international financial shock. This method enables us to differentiate the efficacy of policies and country-specific conditions in both the short and medium term. In the wake of a negative shock, our findings indicate that implementing more stringent capital controls is likely detrimental. In contrast, foreign exchange interventions and macroprudential policies prove beneficial in mitigating the risks associated with excessive inflows in the short and medium term. Notably, monetary policy cannot insulate economies from the risks of substantial capital inflows in the short or medium term. Furthermore, while institutional quality does not influence the risks in the short term, it can potentially reduce them in the medium term. We underscore the intertemporal tradeoffs associated with these policies, highlighting an aspect not considered in previous studies, which predominantly focused on the short-term impact.Keywords: Policy interventioncountry-specific conditionsfinancial shocks Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.Notes1 The short term refers to a period of two quarters, and the meduim term to eight quarters.2 We build on Ben Zeev (Citation2017) by assuming identical quarterly values equal to the corresponding annual values to transform annual capital control data into quarterly frequency. This assumption is strong, particularly for capital control indexes for which Fernández et al. (Citation2016) argue that these controls vary little over a year, have low standard deviations, and are highly acyclical in nature.3 Chinn and Ito (Citation2008) and Fernández et al. (Citation2016) indices capture “intensity” in the sense of how comprehensively capital flows are restricted. Besides, aggregate indices of capital controls may reflect a form of intensity of restrictions on capital movements across borders. For instance, Fernández et al. (Citation2016) show that an aggregate index of controls on capital inflows captures the evolution of actual tax rates on capital inflows in the emblematic case of Brazil in the late 2000s. Then, our conclusion continues to hold although that Chinn and Ito (Citation2008) and Fernández et al. (Citation2016) are ‘de jure’ indices.Additional informationFundingThis study is supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number [PSAU/2023/R/1444].","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"52 19","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136281923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-13DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2279555
Juan Rafael Ruiz
AbstractIn 2020 the European Union designed a stimulus programme aimed at supporting Member States’ economic recovery following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Several countries were reluctant to endorse the programme rejecting the idea of fiscal expansion as a means of cushioning the impact of the health crisis. They dubbed themselves ‘the frugals’, a term extensively used in media coverage from then on. The narrative of thrifty versus profligate economies has been a leitmotiv in policy negotiations at the EU level despite the fact that no economic school of thought defines macroeconomic characteristics in terms of frugality or wastefulness. In this paper we analyze to what extent the economic behavior of European countries can be characterized along those lines by assessing observable economic indicators related to public and private indebtedness, fiscal income and spending, characteristics of the welfare state, the labor market and contributions to economic growth from internal and external demand. We draw from three main theoretical approaches in order to choose meaningful indicators for comparing different economic structures.Keywords: Comparative economicsEuropean Unionfrugalsmediterranean countrieswelfare state Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For more details on the characteristics of NGEU see Freier et al. (Citation2022).2 For a detailed analysis of the evolution of these paradigms, see Cárdenas, Herrero, and Rial (Citation2020).3 Member States' operating budgetary balances are calculated using data on the allocation of EU expenditure by Member State and on Member States' contributions to the EU Budget. The operating budgetary balance of each Member State is calculated as the difference between the operating expenditure (excluding administration) allocated to each Member State and the adjusted 'national contribution' of each Member State as follows: OBBi=: TAEi−: H5i−: TNCi·TAEEU−H5EUTNCEU. Where: OBBi = operating budgetary balance of Member State, TAEi = total allocated expenditure of Member State, H5i = administrative expenditure allocated to Member State, TNCi = total national contribution of Member State.4 Italy is the only Southern country to maintain a positive contribution in the period under analysis.5 The euro crisis also dubbed the “European debt crisis” refers to the period comprised between 2009 and 2010, when interest rates for public debt rose sharply for Southern countries in a context of financial fragility, bank bailouts and speculative positions looking to take advantage of the institutional hurdles in the EU.6 This feature applies to Spain, Portugal and Greece, but not Italy.7 During the last decades, the reforms of the welfare state have not focused solely on spending. There are voices pressing to modify its physiognomy by implementing a model closer to that of the US, replaceing universal rights with mean-tested benefits, shifting welfare production fro
{"title":"Comparative economic analysis vs moralistic tales: an application to the myth of frugality","authors":"Juan Rafael Ruiz","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2279555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2279555","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn 2020 the European Union designed a stimulus programme aimed at supporting Member States’ economic recovery following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Several countries were reluctant to endorse the programme rejecting the idea of fiscal expansion as a means of cushioning the impact of the health crisis. They dubbed themselves ‘the frugals’, a term extensively used in media coverage from then on. The narrative of thrifty versus profligate economies has been a leitmotiv in policy negotiations at the EU level despite the fact that no economic school of thought defines macroeconomic characteristics in terms of frugality or wastefulness. In this paper we analyze to what extent the economic behavior of European countries can be characterized along those lines by assessing observable economic indicators related to public and private indebtedness, fiscal income and spending, characteristics of the welfare state, the labor market and contributions to economic growth from internal and external demand. We draw from three main theoretical approaches in order to choose meaningful indicators for comparing different economic structures.Keywords: Comparative economicsEuropean Unionfrugalsmediterranean countrieswelfare state Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For more details on the characteristics of NGEU see Freier et al. (Citation2022).2 For a detailed analysis of the evolution of these paradigms, see Cárdenas, Herrero, and Rial (Citation2020).3 Member States' operating budgetary balances are calculated using data on the allocation of EU expenditure by Member State and on Member States' contributions to the EU Budget. The operating budgetary balance of each Member State is calculated as the difference between the operating expenditure (excluding administration) allocated to each Member State and the adjusted 'national contribution' of each Member State as follows: OBBi=: TAEi−: H5i−: TNCi·TAEEU−H5EUTNCEU. Where: OBBi = operating budgetary balance of Member State, TAEi = total allocated expenditure of Member State, H5i = administrative expenditure allocated to Member State, TNCi = total national contribution of Member State.4 Italy is the only Southern country to maintain a positive contribution in the period under analysis.5 The euro crisis also dubbed the “European debt crisis” refers to the period comprised between 2009 and 2010, when interest rates for public debt rose sharply for Southern countries in a context of financial fragility, bank bailouts and speculative positions looking to take advantage of the institutional hurdles in the EU.6 This feature applies to Spain, Portugal and Greece, but not Italy.7 During the last decades, the reforms of the welfare state have not focused solely on spending. There are voices pressing to modify its physiognomy by implementing a model closer to that of the US, replaceing universal rights with mean-tested benefits, shifting welfare production fro","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"52 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136281926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-19DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2268090
Paulo R. Mota
AbstractThe slow recovery following the recent financial crisis in many developed countries, and the predictable long lasting economic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic have raised a new interest on the topic of employment hysteresis. In the presence of hysteresis there is no predetermined long-run equilibrium level of aggregate employment. As the economic system is not self-adjusting toward a unique equilibrium, timely, and sustained expansionary macroeconomic policies should be applied to mitigate the impact of negative shocks. The purpose of this paper is to uncover hysteresis effects in the macrodynamics of employment along with variations in its intensity that may result from outbreaks in aggregate demand uncertainty. We estimate a switching employment equation based on the play model of hysteresis, which describes a dynamic process whereby non-convex adjustment costs and uncertainty create intervals of weak reaction of employment to small changes in forcing variables, but spurts in the reaction to large demand shocks. As a novel feature, the estimation allows the presence of structural breaks in the value of the switching parameter of the employment equation due to aggregate demand uncertainty outbreaks. We have concluded that hysteresis effects increased in general in crisis periods associated to outbreaks of uncertainty in aggregate demand.Keywords: Employmenthysteresisuncertaintystructural breaksJEL CLASSIFICATION CODES: E24J23 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Local input extrema that are not followed by an absolute extrema (see, e.g., Cross et al. Citation2005).2 Therefore, hysteresis should not be confused with the presence of a unit root in a linear dynamic system, or zero root in continuous time difference equations (see Amable et al. Citation1993, Citation1994). The consequence is that non-stationary econometrics cannot be used to overcome the role of uncertainty and to make predictions about the future on the basis of past data. This issue has been put forward by Davidson (Citation1993) concerning the adequacy of the concept of hysteresis in the context of post Keynesian economics.3 For example, uncertainty about the course of technical progress, the future behavior of prices, the outcome of plan of investment, not to mention the effects of natural and political cataclysms with economic impact (Robinson Citation1974, 1).4 The possibility that the firms have to adjust labor input along the intensive margin, i.e., fluctuations in hours worked per employee, may also enhance the employment hysteresis effects (Mota, Varejão, and Vasconcelos Citation2012).5 The importance of the initial conditions and path dependence as drivers of the outcome of economic system was early recognized by Robinson (Citation1974).6 See also Rios, Rachinskii, and Cross (Citation2017).7 This is perfectly compatible with the concept of hysteresis. In fact “…hysteresis involves explicit structural change in
Citation1993 Citation1994;Cross Citation1994, Citation1997;Cross等人。Citation2005;我们假设总需求的外生成分xt通过其对价格水平的影响来决定企业的活动状态,而价格水平对应于模型假设下的总收入企业还会因收购有形资产(如企业特定设备)或无形资产(如通过营销和广告投资获得的声誉)或技术知识(参见Belke、Baudisch和Göcke Citation2020)而产生沉没成本;Dias and Shackleton citation; 2011;Folta, Johnson, and O 'Brien Citation2006;Pindyck Citation1988, Citation1991)。由于“柠檬”问题(Pindyck citation1991,1111),其他非公司特定投资,如办公设备、汽车、卡车和计算机,其转售价值可能远低于其购买成本。此外,为了进入新市场,企业往往不得不承担不可逆转的成本,例如,收集市场收入信息、创建分销和服务网络、广告或建立品牌(见Adamonis和Göcke Citation2019)(1) Rαj,βj(xt−1)={1,如果Rαj,βj(xt−1)=0且xt≥βj[进入市场]或Rαj,βj(xt−1)=1且xt>αj[在市场中保持活跃]0,如果Rαj,βj(xt−1)=0且xt<βj[保持不活跃]或Rαj,βj(xt−1)=1且xt≤αj[退出市场](1),则推导出具有无限计划视界的离散时间利润最大化问题,贴现因子δ=11+i,其中i为利率(参见Göcke Citation2002, 118和Mota等)。17 .引用(citation) 2012,以获得该模型的完整描述在模型的假设范围内,出口和进入的触发值分别为αj=wj−δFj和βj=wj+δHj(参见,例如Göcke Citation2002;Mota, varej<e:1> o, and Vasconcelos引文2012).18如果我们考虑将一个公司分解为单个生产单位,每个生产单位由一个非理想的继电器操作员代表,那么这个程式化模型可以很好地描述就业动态(见Belke和Göcke Citation1999;交叉Citation2014)。因此,在这种情况下,进入市场的决定类似于雇佣的决定,而退出市场的决定类似于解雇的决定这与对企业就业的不连续和不规则调整的经验观察相吻合,在这种情况下,不作为的时期会被大规模调整的插曲所打断(参见例如,Caballero, Engel和Haltiwanger引文,1997;汉默麦希Citation1989;Mota, varej<e:1> o,和Vasconcelos引文2012;varej<e:1>和葡萄牙引文2007).20企业对总需求冲击的反应方式的异质性源于特定的成本结构,包括非凸调整成本(可能取决于企业的年龄、规模、所有权、平均工作技能水平和创新),以及企业应对不确定性的方式(见Gaëlle和Scarpetta Citation2006)参见Cross et al. (Citation2005);Piscitelli et al. (Citation2000),对Preisach迟滞模型的几何描述进行了更全面的描述由于我们假设公司均匀分布在Preisach三角形中,滞回回路的分支是二次函数在企业层面上只有两个分支,只有当xt在βj以上增加或在αj.24以下减少时才会发生分支间的过渡这源于Preisach模型的消去特性(见Mayergoyz Citation2003)关于Preisach滞回模型的完整描述,参见Mayergoyz (Citation2003);莫塔和瓦斯孔塞洛斯(citation) 2012 .26参见Cross et al. (Citation2010);Göcke和Werner (Citation2015);27 . Piscitelli et al. (Citation1999)关于系统在滞后强迫变量的平衡水平上具有反馈效应的理论模型另见Amable et al (Citation1993, Citation1994).28迟滞的线性游戏模型(使用该术语是因为它与力学中的游戏相似)可以被视为Preisach迟滞回路的分段线性近似,其中线性函数的斜率在极值处变化(参见Krasnosel’skii和Pokrovskii Citation1989;Visitin Citation1994) 29该模型的一般描述可在visittin (Citation1994)中找到这可能是外生冲击的结果,也可能是需求减少的内因。事实上,总需求的缺乏和失业的增加可以被看作是经济失灵的结果,从而影响到商业信心序列xt1→xt2→xt3起源于逆时针方向的abcde尽管实际工资也可能是滞后效应的一个来源,但我们的目的是检验总需求冲击造成的滞后效应是否存在。因此,实际工资作为一个非滞后的解释变量进入就业方程。 关于具有滞后的经济系统中几个输入的共同影响,参见Göcke (Citation2019)。33我们假设就业需求来源于消费者对最终产品和服务的需求(这决定了规模效应),而就业的可获得性决定了其价格(投入替代效应)。因此,我们在就业方程中加入了传统的解释变量(我们遵循Hamermesh, Citation1993, 30和64)参见Belke和Göcke (Citation2001a, Citation2001b);Göcke (Citation2001)获取更多详细信息参见Mota和Vasconcelos (Citation2021)对这个新版本游戏算法的详细描述式(4)基于Nt和xt之间的分段线性关系,其中游戏线和喷射线通过结点连续连接。在图3中,当输入顺序为xt0→xt1→xt2→xt3时,结点为点a、b、c、d、e和f。结点的位置是先验未知的,因为它们依赖于必须估计的玩法间隔的宽度γ,以及由过去的xt值决定的玩法线的位置。由于相邻的储层和喷流线是相连的,因此使用方程是一个带有未知分裂因子的开关回归的特殊情况,在储层模型的背景下,该分裂因子对应于宽度γt(见图3),类似于线性样条函数(见Poirier Citation1973, Citation1976)。在这种情况下,OLS估计量在标准回归模型假设下是渐近一致和正态分布的(见Hinkley Citation1969;哈德逊Citation1966;地方Citation1976) .37点请注意,在该模型中,总就业、Nt和由xt捕获的总需求之间的关系中存在非时间性质的结构变化,这种变化源于xt的反转,以及随后累积的超过游戏间隔的变化,以及由于需求不确定性爆发而导致游戏间隔本身变化而导致的时域结构变化对于水平中的变量,增宽的Dickey-Fuller检验统计量(在检验方程中包含一个截距)通常大于1%临界值(- 3.509),表明我们不拒绝序列的非平稳性(附录2)。对于序列的第一个差,我们通常拒绝存在单位根的假设(检验统计量小于1%临界值)。我们得出结论,通常变量是I(1)的积分。唯一的
{"title":"Aggregate demand uncertainty outbreaks and employment hysteresis in G7 countries","authors":"Paulo R. Mota","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2268090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2268090","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe slow recovery following the recent financial crisis in many developed countries, and the predictable long lasting economic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic have raised a new interest on the topic of employment hysteresis. In the presence of hysteresis there is no predetermined long-run equilibrium level of aggregate employment. As the economic system is not self-adjusting toward a unique equilibrium, timely, and sustained expansionary macroeconomic policies should be applied to mitigate the impact of negative shocks. The purpose of this paper is to uncover hysteresis effects in the macrodynamics of employment along with variations in its intensity that may result from outbreaks in aggregate demand uncertainty. We estimate a switching employment equation based on the play model of hysteresis, which describes a dynamic process whereby non-convex adjustment costs and uncertainty create intervals of weak reaction of employment to small changes in forcing variables, but spurts in the reaction to large demand shocks. As a novel feature, the estimation allows the presence of structural breaks in the value of the switching parameter of the employment equation due to aggregate demand uncertainty outbreaks. We have concluded that hysteresis effects increased in general in crisis periods associated to outbreaks of uncertainty in aggregate demand.Keywords: Employmenthysteresisuncertaintystructural breaksJEL CLASSIFICATION CODES: E24J23 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Local input extrema that are not followed by an absolute extrema (see, e.g., Cross et al. Citation2005).2 Therefore, hysteresis should not be confused with the presence of a unit root in a linear dynamic system, or zero root in continuous time difference equations (see Amable et al. Citation1993, Citation1994). The consequence is that non-stationary econometrics cannot be used to overcome the role of uncertainty and to make predictions about the future on the basis of past data. This issue has been put forward by Davidson (Citation1993) concerning the adequacy of the concept of hysteresis in the context of post Keynesian economics.3 For example, uncertainty about the course of technical progress, the future behavior of prices, the outcome of plan of investment, not to mention the effects of natural and political cataclysms with economic impact (Robinson Citation1974, 1).4 The possibility that the firms have to adjust labor input along the intensive margin, i.e., fluctuations in hours worked per employee, may also enhance the employment hysteresis effects (Mota, Varejão, and Vasconcelos Citation2012).5 The importance of the initial conditions and path dependence as drivers of the outcome of economic system was early recognized by Robinson (Citation1974).6 See also Rios, Rachinskii, and Cross (Citation2017).7 This is perfectly compatible with the concept of hysteresis. In fact “…hysteresis involves explicit structural change in","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135729611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-17DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2268061
Donald W. Katzner
AbstractThis is my response to criticisms of my paper "The Problem with Probability" (JPKE, 2023, n. 3) given by Dequech, Cantillo, and Skillman and Veneziani (also appearing in JPKE 2023, n. 3). The main issues discussed concern the possibility of having knowledge of the future and empirical testing of decision-making models.Keywords: Knowledge of the futuredecision making AcknowledgmentThe author thanks Daniel L. Gordon for his help.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The two other kinds of knowledge are (1) ‘acquaintance knowledge’ obtained by being acquainted with other people or things and (2) ‘knowledge how’ or knowledge of how to do something.2 Of course, a fact is usually defined as something known to be true.3 However, that impossibility can be refuted if it can be conclusively demonstrated that what is impossible actually has been or can be done.4 Panic behavior may be defined as a large increase in buying or selling that occurs in anticipation of a specific event or the occurrence of an unexpected one.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDonald W. KatznerDonald W. Katzner is at Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts/Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
摘要这是我对Dequech, Cantillo, Skillman和Veneziani(也出现在JPKE 2023, n. 3)对我的论文“概率问题”(JPKE, 2023, n. 3)提出的批评的回应。讨论的主要问题涉及拥有未来知识的可能性和决策模型的实证测试。关键字:未来决策知识致谢作者感谢Daniel L. Gordon的帮助。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1另外两种知识是(1)通过认识他人或事物而获得的“认识知识”和(2)关于如何做某事的“认识”当然,事实通常被定义为已知是真实的事物然而,如果能够最终证明不可能的事情实际上已经或能够做到,那么这种不可能性就可以被驳倒恐慌行为可以定义为在预期特定事件或意外事件发生时出现的大量买入或卖出行为。作者简介:donald W. Katzner,美国马萨诸塞州阿默斯特市马萨诸塞大学经济系教授。
{"title":"The past is only prologue – not the future: response to my critics","authors":"Donald W. Katzner","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2268061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2268061","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis is my response to criticisms of my paper \"The Problem with Probability\" (JPKE, 2023, n. 3) given by Dequech, Cantillo, and Skillman and Veneziani (also appearing in JPKE 2023, n. 3). The main issues discussed concern the possibility of having knowledge of the future and empirical testing of decision-making models.Keywords: Knowledge of the futuredecision making AcknowledgmentThe author thanks Daniel L. Gordon for his help.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The two other kinds of knowledge are (1) ‘acquaintance knowledge’ obtained by being acquainted with other people or things and (2) ‘knowledge how’ or knowledge of how to do something.2 Of course, a fact is usually defined as something known to be true.3 However, that impossibility can be refuted if it can be conclusively demonstrated that what is impossible actually has been or can be done.4 Panic behavior may be defined as a large increase in buying or selling that occurs in anticipation of a specific event or the occurrence of an unexpected one.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDonald W. KatznerDonald W. Katzner is at Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts/Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135993936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-02DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2246444
Noemi Levy-Orlik
AbstractNumerous discussions on money and financial institutions have been advanced both between and within economic theories. Heterodox schools of thought consider money to be non-neutral, with causality running from money demand to money supply and the interest rate as a monetary and distributive variable. In this paper we discuss the views of Michał Kalecki and John Maynard Keynes on money and the operation of financial institutions. Kalecki and Keynes formulated the theory of effective demand, specifically in terms of its effects on economic growth and financial instability. Nonetheless, in line with the work of Tracy Mott, we argue that Kalecki’s analyses of the financial system are more profound because they better capture the complexity of the oligopolistic financial system, providing the foundations for Keynes’ liquidity preference theory. As a result, it may be concluded that the main problem of economic growth and investment spending is the structure of corporate finance.Keywords: KaleckiKeynesmoneyfinancial institutionsJEL Codes: E11E12E41E44 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In a letter to Ralph George Hawtrey, Keynes stated his understanding of the classical school to mean “not merely Ricardo and Mill, but also Marshall, Pigou and Henderson and myself until quite recently and, in fact every teacher of the subject in this country.” He did not include Hawtrey and Friedrich Hayek whom he considered “neo-classical'” (letter to Hawtrey, 15 April 1936, CW XIV, p. 24). Despite their awareness of the prominence afforded to monetary aspects of economics, Keynes contended that these scholars tended to endorse classical conclusions on matters of monetary policy (though taking a more eclectic approach on other policy issues), Tily Citation2007, footnote 2, p, 10.2 Keynes argued that “the ordinary Budget should be balanced at all times. It is the capital budget which should fluctuate with the demand for employment” (CW, XXVII p. 225), adding that ”the very reason that capital expenditure is capable of paying for itself makes it much better budgetwise and does not involve the progressive increase of budgetary difficulties” (CW, XXVII p 320), concluding that “if, for one reason or another, the volume of planned investment fails to produce equilibrium, the lack of balance would be met by unbalancing one way or the other the current Budget” (CW, XXVII p. 352).3 Keynes’ view of monetary policy and its effects on interest rate and finance changed radically as a result of his visit to the United States. This argument is summarized in the Chicago papers, for further references see Minsky Citation1989.4 According to Chick (Citation1983) the revolving fund is completely different from the theory of loanable funds. In the former there is a process of ongoing liquidity issuance and payment involving different borrowers, while in the latter credit issued to one borrower needs to be repaid by the same ag
{"title":"The role of money and financial institutions in Kalecki and Keynes","authors":"Noemi Levy-Orlik","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2246444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2246444","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractNumerous discussions on money and financial institutions have been advanced both between and within economic theories. Heterodox schools of thought consider money to be non-neutral, with causality running from money demand to money supply and the interest rate as a monetary and distributive variable. In this paper we discuss the views of Michał Kalecki and John Maynard Keynes on money and the operation of financial institutions. Kalecki and Keynes formulated the theory of effective demand, specifically in terms of its effects on economic growth and financial instability. Nonetheless, in line with the work of Tracy Mott, we argue that Kalecki’s analyses of the financial system are more profound because they better capture the complexity of the oligopolistic financial system, providing the foundations for Keynes’ liquidity preference theory. As a result, it may be concluded that the main problem of economic growth and investment spending is the structure of corporate finance.Keywords: KaleckiKeynesmoneyfinancial institutionsJEL Codes: E11E12E41E44 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In a letter to Ralph George Hawtrey, Keynes stated his understanding of the classical school to mean “not merely Ricardo and Mill, but also Marshall, Pigou and Henderson and myself until quite recently and, in fact every teacher of the subject in this country.” He did not include Hawtrey and Friedrich Hayek whom he considered “neo-classical'” (letter to Hawtrey, 15 April 1936, CW XIV, p. 24). Despite their awareness of the prominence afforded to monetary aspects of economics, Keynes contended that these scholars tended to endorse classical conclusions on matters of monetary policy (though taking a more eclectic approach on other policy issues), Tily Citation2007, footnote 2, p, 10.2 Keynes argued that “the ordinary Budget should be balanced at all times. It is the capital budget which should fluctuate with the demand for employment” (CW, XXVII p. 225), adding that ”the very reason that capital expenditure is capable of paying for itself makes it much better budgetwise and does not involve the progressive increase of budgetary difficulties” (CW, XXVII p 320), concluding that “if, for one reason or another, the volume of planned investment fails to produce equilibrium, the lack of balance would be met by unbalancing one way or the other the current Budget” (CW, XXVII p. 352).3 Keynes’ view of monetary policy and its effects on interest rate and finance changed radically as a result of his visit to the United States. This argument is summarized in the Chicago papers, for further references see Minsky Citation1989.4 According to Chick (Citation1983) the revolving fund is completely different from the theory of loanable funds. In the former there is a process of ongoing liquidity issuance and payment involving different borrowers, while in the latter credit issued to one borrower needs to be repaid by the same ag","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135902174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-02DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2023.2242348
Tanweer Akram, Khawaja Mamun
AbstractJohn Maynard Keynes argued that the central bank influences the long-term interest rate through the effect of its policy rate on the current short-term interest rate. However, Keynes’s claim was confined to the behavior of the long-term government bond yield. This paper investigates whether Keynes’s claim holds for the yields of spread products and over-the-counter financial derivatives by econometrically modeling the dynamics of the pound sterling (GBP)–denominated long-term interest rate swap yield. It uses the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity modeling approach to examine the relationship between the month-over-month change in the current short-term interest rate and the month-over-month change in the long-term swap yield, while controlling for several key macroeconomic and financial variables. The month-over-month change in the current short-term interest rate has a positive and statistically significant effect on the month-over-month change in the long-term swap yield. This finding reinforces and extends Keynes’s conjecture concerning the central bank’s influence over the long-term interest rate. The investigation’s empirical findings and their policy implications are discussed from a Keynesian perspective.Keywords: Interest rate swapsswap yieldsinterest ratesBank of EnglandJohn Maynard KeynesJEL Classifications: E43E50E58E60G10G12 AcknowledgementThe authors thank participants at various workshops, the editor, the guest editors of the special issue in honor of late Professor Tracy Mott and the two anonymous referees for their invaluable comments. They also thank Ms. Elizabeth Dunn for her copyediting support. This paper was presented at the 1st annual Professor Tracy Mott Economic Theory and Policy Workshop at the University of Denver in Denver, Colorado (September 23–24, 2022). An earlier version of the paper was a published in the Levy Institute’s working paper series. The authors’ institutional affiliations are provided solely for identification purposes. Views expressed are merely those of the authors.Disclosure statementThe standard disclaimer holds.Data availability statementThe dataset used in the empirical part of this paper is available upon request to bona fide researchers for the replication and verification of the results.Notes1 However, it must be said that during the sterling crisis of 2022, when both the short-term interest rate and the long-term gilt yield rose while the GBP depreciated, the swap yields rose (Luhnow, Thomas, and Colchester Citation2022). Clearly the effect of a higher short-term interest rate on the swap yield dominated over the GBP’s deprecation.2 Although the sum is slightly higher than one (1) for 2-year swap rates.3 Results are available upon request.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Notes on contributorsTanweer AkramTanweer Akram is a Senior Vice President
摘要凯恩斯认为,中央银行通过其政策利率对当前短期利率的影响来影响长期利率。然而,凯恩斯的主张仅限于长期政府债券收益率的行为。本文通过对英镑(GBP)计价的长期利率掉期收益率动态进行计量经济学建模,研究凯恩斯的说法是否适用于点差产品和场外金融衍生品的收益率。它使用广义自回归条件异方差模型方法来检验当前短期利率的逐月变化与长期掉期收益率的逐月变化之间的关系,同时控制了几个关键的宏观经济和金融变量。当前短期利率的逐月变化对长期掉期收益率的逐月变化具有正的、统计学上显著的影响。这一发现强化并扩展了凯恩斯关于央行对长期利率影响的猜想。本文从凯恩斯主义的角度讨论了调查的实证结果及其政策含义。关键词:利率掉期收益利率英格兰银行约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯分类:E43E50E58E60G10G12致谢作者感谢各研讨会的与会者、编辑、已故特蕾西·莫特教授特刊的客座编辑以及两位匿名审稿人的宝贵意见。他们还感谢伊丽莎白·邓恩(Elizabeth Dunn)在编辑方面的支持。本文于2022年9月23日至24日在科罗拉多州丹佛市丹佛大学举行的第一届特雷西·莫特教授经济理论与政策研讨会上发表。该论文的早期版本发表在利维研究所的工作论文系列中。作者的机构隶属关系仅供识别之用。所表达的观点仅代表作者的观点。披露声明标准的免责声明成立。数据可用性声明本文实证部分使用的数据集可根据要求提供给真正的研究人员进行结果的复制和验证。注1然而,必须指出的是,在2022年英镑危机期间,当短期利率和长期金边债券收益率都上升而英镑贬值时,掉期收益率上升(Luhnow, Thomas, and Colchester Citation2022)。显然,短期利率上升对掉期收益的影响超过了英镑的贬值虽然2年期掉期利率的总和略高于1 (1)结果可应要求提供。本研究没有从公共、商业或非营利部门的资助机构获得任何特定的资助。本文作者是花旗银行的高级副总裁兼高级经济学家。本文作者是圣心大学杰克韦尔奇商业与技术学院的副教授。
{"title":"An analysis of UK swap yields","authors":"Tanweer Akram, Khawaja Mamun","doi":"10.1080/01603477.2023.2242348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2023.2242348","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractJohn Maynard Keynes argued that the central bank influences the long-term interest rate through the effect of its policy rate on the current short-term interest rate. However, Keynes’s claim was confined to the behavior of the long-term government bond yield. This paper investigates whether Keynes’s claim holds for the yields of spread products and over-the-counter financial derivatives by econometrically modeling the dynamics of the pound sterling (GBP)–denominated long-term interest rate swap yield. It uses the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity modeling approach to examine the relationship between the month-over-month change in the current short-term interest rate and the month-over-month change in the long-term swap yield, while controlling for several key macroeconomic and financial variables. The month-over-month change in the current short-term interest rate has a positive and statistically significant effect on the month-over-month change in the long-term swap yield. This finding reinforces and extends Keynes’s conjecture concerning the central bank’s influence over the long-term interest rate. The investigation’s empirical findings and their policy implications are discussed from a Keynesian perspective.Keywords: Interest rate swapsswap yieldsinterest ratesBank of EnglandJohn Maynard KeynesJEL Classifications: E43E50E58E60G10G12 AcknowledgementThe authors thank participants at various workshops, the editor, the guest editors of the special issue in honor of late Professor Tracy Mott and the two anonymous referees for their invaluable comments. They also thank Ms. Elizabeth Dunn for her copyediting support. This paper was presented at the 1st annual Professor Tracy Mott Economic Theory and Policy Workshop at the University of Denver in Denver, Colorado (September 23–24, 2022). An earlier version of the paper was a published in the Levy Institute’s working paper series. The authors’ institutional affiliations are provided solely for identification purposes. Views expressed are merely those of the authors.Disclosure statementThe standard disclaimer holds.Data availability statementThe dataset used in the empirical part of this paper is available upon request to bona fide researchers for the replication and verification of the results.Notes1 However, it must be said that during the sterling crisis of 2022, when both the short-term interest rate and the long-term gilt yield rose while the GBP depreciated, the swap yields rose (Luhnow, Thomas, and Colchester Citation2022). Clearly the effect of a higher short-term interest rate on the swap yield dominated over the GBP’s deprecation.2 Although the sum is slightly higher than one (1) for 2-year swap rates.3 Results are available upon request.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Notes on contributorsTanweer AkramTanweer Akram is a Senior Vice President","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135902304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}