首页 > 最新文献

Community Work & Family最新文献

英文 中文
When business is personal: a mixed methods examination of workaholism in family business leaders 当生意是私人的:对家族企业领导人工作狂的混合方法考察
IF 2.3 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2284114
Malissa A. Clark, Jenell L. S. Wittmer, Angie Jones
Family business leaders are heavily devoted to their business, but to what degree does this manifest as workaholism? To examine this question, a mixed methods approach was used which included onlin...
家族企业的领导者对自己的企业投入了大量精力,但这在多大程度上体现为工作狂呢?为了研究这个问题,我们使用了一种混合方法,其中包括在线…
{"title":"When business is personal: a mixed methods examination of workaholism in family business leaders","authors":"Malissa A. Clark, Jenell L. S. Wittmer, Angie Jones","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2284114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2284114","url":null,"abstract":"Family business leaders are heavily devoted to their business, but to what degree does this manifest as workaholism? To examine this question, a mixed methods approach was used which included onlin...","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Work hours, job characteristics and life satisfaction among working mothers and fathers 职业父母的工作时间、工作特征与生活满意度
IF 2.3 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2287956
Edel Walsh, Aileen Murphy
Families where both parents are employed outside the home are now commonplace. Having multiple life roles can be enriching however, as gender equality isn’t guaranteed, the well-being impacts may m...
父母双方都在外工作的家庭现在很普遍。拥有多重生活角色可以是丰富的,然而,由于性别平等不能保证,幸福感的影响可能是……
{"title":"Work hours, job characteristics and life satisfaction among working mothers and fathers","authors":"Edel Walsh, Aileen Murphy","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2287956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2287956","url":null,"abstract":"Families where both parents are employed outside the home are now commonplace. Having multiple life roles can be enriching however, as gender equality isn’t guaranteed, the well-being impacts may m...","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Work-family justice – meanings and possibilities: introduction to the work and family researchers network special issue 工作-家庭公正——意义与可能性:介绍工作与家庭研究者网络专刊
IF 2.3 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2275975
Melissa A. Milkie, Heejung Chung, Ameeta Jaga
Work-family justice is a key organizing concept centering intellectual and policy work that calls attention to tensions and challenges in work and family integration and highlights key solutions. T...
工作-家庭公正是一个关键的组织概念,以智力和政策工作为中心,它引起人们对工作和家庭融合中的紧张和挑战的关注,并强调关键的解决办法。T…
{"title":"Work-family justice – meanings and possibilities: introduction to the work and family researchers network special issue","authors":"Melissa A. Milkie, Heejung Chung, Ameeta Jaga","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2275975","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2275975","url":null,"abstract":"Work-family justice is a key organizing concept centering intellectual and policy work that calls attention to tensions and challenges in work and family integration and highlights key solutions. T...","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In-work poverty and family policy in Italy: from a frozen to a thawing landscape? 意大利的工作贫困和家庭政策:从冰冻到解冻?
IF 2.3 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2282356
Giovanni Amerigo Giuliani, Nicola De Luigi
The article investigates in-work poverty (IWP) in Italy through the lens of family policies. Adopting a longitudinal perspective, the work scrutinizes whether and to what extent the configuration o...
本文通过家庭政策的视角调查了意大利的在职贫困(IWP)问题。采用纵向视角,工作仔细检查配置是否以及在多大程度上……
{"title":"In-work poverty and family policy in Italy: from a frozen to a thawing landscape?","authors":"Giovanni Amerigo Giuliani, Nicola De Luigi","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2282356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2282356","url":null,"abstract":"The article investigates in-work poverty (IWP) in Italy through the lens of family policies. Adopting a longitudinal perspective, the work scrutinizes whether and to what extent the configuration o...","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond the womb: a mosaic of organizational advocacy for reproductive justice 子宫之外:组织倡导生殖正义的马赛克
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2277119
Nicole Dillard, Taylor Cavallo
ABSTRACTWithin the US, recent calls for greater work-family justice have not only forced organizations to re-conceptualize work, but to re-define the role of organizations themselves. This shift has been striking during times of socio-political change as demonstrated most recently by organizational responses to the reversal of Roe v. Wade, with many companies pledging funding for birthing people seeking abortions. While this type of support is valuable, the singular focus on abortion rights within the reproductive justice context minimizes the scope of its intersectional legacy.The purpose of this paper is to advocate for the organizational application of a comprehensive framework for reproductive justice (CFRJ) guided by intersectional Black Feminist epistemology. We will show that many US organizations have already engaged in reproductive justice by weaving together a mosaic of three socio-political moments (the pathway to marriage equality, restrictive immigration policies and COVID-19), that garnered organizational support and advocacy. These moments reflect the comprehensive nature of reproductive justice as conceived by the Black Feminists who originated the term. These ‘turning points’ demonstrate the organization’s capacity for leadership during times of crisis. The paper concludes with recommendations that explore potential pathways for moving forward in supporting work-family and reproductive justice within organizations.KEYWORDS: Black Feminismorganizationsreproductive justiceHRD‌work-family justice Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNicole DillardNicole Dillard (she/her/hers) is an Assistant Professor in the Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development (OLPD) department at the University of Minnesota. Dr. Dillard's primary research explores the work and organizational experiences of individuals with marginalized social identities.Taylor CavalloTaylor Cavallo (she/her/hers) is a PhD student in the Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development (OLPD) department at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests are focused on the intersection of labor and gender with an emphasis on the experiences of work and motherhood for millennial women.
在美国,最近对工作与家庭公平的呼声不仅迫使组织重新定义工作,而且重新定义组织本身的角色。这种转变在社会政治变革时期尤为显著,最近对罗伊诉韦德案(Roe v. Wade)逆转的组织反应就证明了这一点,许多公司承诺为寻求堕胎的孕妇提供资金。虽然这种支持是有价值的,但在生殖正义背景下对堕胎权利的单一关注使其交叉遗产的范围最小化。本文的目的是倡导以交叉黑人女性主义认识论为指导的生殖正义综合框架(CFRJ)的组织应用。我们将展示,许多美国组织已经通过将三个社会政治时刻(通往婚姻平等的道路、限制性移民政策和COVID-19)交织在一起,获得了组织的支持和倡导,从而参与了生殖正义。这些时刻反映了黑人女权主义者所构想的生殖正义的全面性。这些“转折点”表明了该组织在危机时期的领导能力。论文最后提出了一些建议,探讨了在组织内支持工作-家庭和生殖正义的潜在途径。关键词:黑人女权主义组织生殖正义工作家庭正义披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。nicole Dillard(她/她/她的)是明尼苏达大学组织领导、政策与发展(OLPD)系的助理教授。迪拉德博士的主要研究探索了具有边缘社会身份的个人的工作和组织经历。泰勒·卡瓦洛(她/她/她的)是明尼苏达大学组织领导、政策与发展(OLPD)系的一名博士生。她的研究兴趣集中在劳动和性别的交叉点,重点是千禧一代女性的工作和母性经验。
{"title":"Beyond the womb: a mosaic of organizational advocacy for reproductive justice","authors":"Nicole Dillard, Taylor Cavallo","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2277119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2277119","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWithin the US, recent calls for greater work-family justice have not only forced organizations to re-conceptualize work, but to re-define the role of organizations themselves. This shift has been striking during times of socio-political change as demonstrated most recently by organizational responses to the reversal of Roe v. Wade, with many companies pledging funding for birthing people seeking abortions. While this type of support is valuable, the singular focus on abortion rights within the reproductive justice context minimizes the scope of its intersectional legacy.The purpose of this paper is to advocate for the organizational application of a comprehensive framework for reproductive justice (CFRJ) guided by intersectional Black Feminist epistemology. We will show that many US organizations have already engaged in reproductive justice by weaving together a mosaic of three socio-political moments (the pathway to marriage equality, restrictive immigration policies and COVID-19), that garnered organizational support and advocacy. These moments reflect the comprehensive nature of reproductive justice as conceived by the Black Feminists who originated the term. These ‘turning points’ demonstrate the organization’s capacity for leadership during times of crisis. The paper concludes with recommendations that explore potential pathways for moving forward in supporting work-family and reproductive justice within organizations.KEYWORDS: Black Feminismorganizationsreproductive justiceHRD‌work-family justice Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNicole DillardNicole Dillard (she/her/hers) is an Assistant Professor in the Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development (OLPD) department at the University of Minnesota. Dr. Dillard's primary research explores the work and organizational experiences of individuals with marginalized social identities.Taylor CavalloTaylor Cavallo (she/her/hers) is a PhD student in the Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development (OLPD) department at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests are focused on the intersection of labor and gender with an emphasis on the experiences of work and motherhood for millennial women.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135678784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Reconciling the ideal worker norm and involved fatherhood: new fathers’ experiences of requesting Shared Parental Leave in UK organizations 调和理想的工人规范和参与父亲:英国组织中新父亲申请共享育儿假的经验
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2274276
Jamie Atkinson
The introduction of Shared Parental Leave (SPL) in the UK provided an opportunity for more fathers to take time out of work to be primary carers. The article presents the findings from qualitative interviews carried out with ten British fathers, which analyses their experiences of requesting SPL and the level of organizational support available to them on taking leave. In terms of requesting SPL and on their return to work, two approaches are discernible: these are described as ‘cautious’ and ‘bold’. Although maintaining their commitment to being involved parents, cautious fathers tended to conform to the ideal worker norm. They did so by adopting strategies to mitigate any anticipated career penalty, which included adjusting the timing and length of their leave. Thus the values associated with the ideal worker norm represent a psychological barrier to fathers who might otherwise want to take a longer period of leave or adjust their working hours post-leave. By contrast, bold fathers are less concerned about accommodating their employer's needs in requesting SPL and are prepared to adjust their working hours to facilitate involved fatherhood. The article concludes by considering appropriate responses for policymakers, fathers and organizations.
英国引入的共同育儿假(SPL)为更多的父亲提供了从工作中抽出时间来主要照顾孩子的机会。本文介绍了对10位英国父亲进行的定性访谈的结果,分析了他们申请特殊假期的经历以及在休假时可获得的组织支持水平。在申请SPL和重返工作岗位方面,可以看出两种方法:“谨慎”和“大胆”。尽管谨慎的父亲们保持着他们作为父母的承诺,但他们往往符合理想的工作规范。他们采取了一些策略来减轻任何预期的职业损失,其中包括调整休假的时间和长度。因此,与理想工人规范相关的价值观对父亲来说是一种心理障碍,否则他们可能会想要休更长时间的假或调整休假后的工作时间。相比之下,大胆的父亲不太关心满足雇主要求特殊照顾的需要,并准备调整工作时间以促进参与父亲的工作。文章最后考虑了决策者、父亲和组织的适当反应。
{"title":"Reconciling the ideal worker norm and involved fatherhood: new fathers’ experiences of requesting Shared Parental Leave in UK organizations","authors":"Jamie Atkinson","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2274276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2274276","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of Shared Parental Leave (SPL) in the UK provided an opportunity for more fathers to take time out of work to be primary carers. The article presents the findings from qualitative interviews carried out with ten British fathers, which analyses their experiences of requesting SPL and the level of organizational support available to them on taking leave. In terms of requesting SPL and on their return to work, two approaches are discernible: these are described as ‘cautious’ and ‘bold’. Although maintaining their commitment to being involved parents, cautious fathers tended to conform to the ideal worker norm. They did so by adopting strategies to mitigate any anticipated career penalty, which included adjusting the timing and length of their leave. Thus the values associated with the ideal worker norm represent a psychological barrier to fathers who might otherwise want to take a longer period of leave or adjust their working hours post-leave. By contrast, bold fathers are less concerned about accommodating their employer's needs in requesting SPL and are prepared to adjust their working hours to facilitate involved fatherhood. The article concludes by considering appropriate responses for policymakers, fathers and organizations.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135814125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Work-family justice: its meanings and its implementation 工作-家庭公平:意义与实现
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2272571
Caitlyn Collins, Ameeta Jaga, Nancy Folbre, M. Rosario Castro Bernardini, Sherry Leiwant, Vicki Shabo, Melissa A. Milkie, Janet Gornick
ABSTRACTIt's an incredibly important moment to focus on work-family scholarship – and to consider research related to ‘just’ work and care in unsettling and challenging times. Against this backdrop, the 2022 WFRN theme was established. The conference gathered members from around the world toward building impactful scholarship for practices and policy. In this Voices piece, we draw upon WFRN presidential panelists' voices. The first plenary, ‘The Meanings of Work-Family Justice’, provided opportunities for panelists to consider different ways to conceptualize and expand this idea as labor markets, workplaces, and many aspects of people's lives are in flux, with new understandings about how to think expansively about creating ‘work-family justice’, The second plenary – ‘Work-Family Justice on the Ground’ – featured panelists from leading non-profits who discuss how they've met challenges and succeeded in implementing and building policies that create a more just world of work and care. They discuss barriers and some ideas for overcoming difficulties. We conclude by considering the evolving meanings and practices of work-family justice. In all, the voices presented here help us focus on creating more ‘just’ worlds of work and care – a distinct and vital – if sometimes precarious – possibility in this moment.KEYWORDS: Workfamilyjusticecarepolicy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Ideas and excerpts are drawn from related writing (Collins, Citation2019, Citation2020).2 In this section, I present reflections and remarks presented in the WFRN Presidential Plenary: Work-Family Justice on the Ground around major themes proposed by the organizers of the plenary.3 Bringing negative consequences for its beneficiaries4 https://www.abetterbalance.org/resources/report-summary-women-in-the-workforce-nyc/5 https://www.nber.org/papers/w30140Additional informationNotes on contributorsCaitlyn CollinsCaitlyn Collins is Associate Professor of Sociology at Washington University in St. Louis. She conducts cross-national qualitative research on gender inequality at work and in family life. Her first book is Making Motherhood Work: How Women Manage Careers and Caregiving (2019, Princeton University Press).Ameeta JagaAmeeta Jaga (Ph.D.) is Professor of Organisational Psychology in the School of Management Studies at the University of Cape Town and a non-resident fellow with the Hutchins Centre for African and African American Research, Harvard University. She takes a Southern and decolonial approach to address the geopolitics in knowledge production and focuses on a gendered and social class analysis of work-family concerns primarily among low-income mothers. Her work has had policy impact in advancing workplace support for breastfeeding in local government. Ameeta has published widely across disciplines including Gender, Work and Organisation, Work, Employment and Society, International Journal of Human Resource Mana
这是一个非常重要的时刻,专注于工作-家庭奖学金,并考虑在令人不安和充满挑战的时代与“just”工作和护理相关的研究。在这种背景下,确定了2022年世界自然保护区的主题。会议聚集了来自世界各地的成员,旨在为实践和政策建立有影响力的学术。在这篇文章中,我们引用了WFRN主席小组成员的声音。第一次全体会议“工作-家庭公平的意义”为小组成员提供了机会,让他们考虑不同的方式来概念化和扩展这一概念,因为劳动力市场、工作场所和人们生活的许多方面都在不断变化,他们对如何广泛思考创造“工作-家庭公平”有了新的理解。第二次全体会议的主题是“工作与家庭的公正”,来自主要非营利组织的小组成员讨论了他们如何应对挑战,并成功实施和制定政策,创造一个更加公正的工作和护理世界。他们讨论障碍和克服困难的一些想法。最后,我们考虑了工作-家庭正义的演变意义和实践。总而言之,这里提出的声音有助于我们专注于创造更“公正”的工作和护理世界——这是当前一种独特而重要的可能性,尽管有时是不稳定的。关键词:工作、家庭、司法、医疗、政策披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1观点和节选来自相关文章(Collins, Citation2019, Citation2020)在本节中,我将介绍在世界妇女和家庭联合会主席全体会议上提出的关于全体会议组织者提出的主要主题的思考和评论:在实地工作-家庭正义给受益者带来负面影响4 https://www.abetterbalance.org/resources/report-summary-women-in-the-workforce-nyc/5 https://www.nber.org/papers/w30140Additional信息关于贡献者的说明scitlyn Collins scitlyn Collins是圣路易斯华盛顿大学的社会学副教授。她对工作和家庭生活中的性别不平等进行了跨国定性研究。她的第一本书是《让母亲工作:女性如何管理职业和照顾孩子》(2019年,普林斯顿大学出版社)。Ameeta JagaAmeeta Jaga(博士)是开普敦大学管理研究学院的组织心理学教授,也是哈佛大学哈钦斯非洲和非裔美国人研究中心的非常驻研究员。她采用南方和非殖民化的方法来解决知识生产中的地缘政治问题,并着重于性别和社会阶层对主要是低收入母亲的工作家庭问题的分析。她的工作在促进地方政府工作场所对母乳喂养的支持方面产生了政策影响。Ameeta发表了广泛的跨学科文章,包括《性别、工作与组织》、《工作、就业与社会》、《国际人力资源管理杂志》和《应用心理学杂志》。她是《社区、工作和家庭》杂志的副主编。Nancy FolbreNancy Folbre,美国马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校政治经济研究所经济学名誉退休教授、性别与护理工作项目主任,美国巴德学院利维经济研究所高级研究员。她的研究探索了政治经济学和女权主义理论之间的联系,特别强调了无偿护理工作的价值。除了在学术期刊上发表大量文章外,她还是《父权制度的兴衰》(Verso, 2021)的作者,《为了爱与金钱:美国的护理工作》(Russell Sage, 2012)的编辑,以及《贪婪、欲望和性别:经济思想史》(牛津,2009),《重视儿童:重新思考家庭经济学》(哈佛,2008)和《看不见的心:经济学和家庭价值观》(新出版社,2001)的作者。她还为大众读者撰写了广泛的文章,包括为《纽约时报》经济博客、《国家》和《美国展望》撰稿。你可以在她的网站和博客上了解更多关于她的信息,Care Talk: http://blogs.umass.edu/folbre/.M。罗萨里奥·卡斯特罗·贝尔纳迪尼。Rosario Castro Bernardini博士是马萨诸塞州波士顿乐施会美国分部的“生计与权利”研究员。她在宾夕法尼亚州立大学获得社会学和妇女、性别与性的双博士学位。“更好的平衡”是一家法律倡导组织,总部设在纽约市,在纳什维尔、田纳西州、丹佛、科罗拉多州和华盛顿特区设有办事处,其使命是确保工人能够在不危及经济安全的情况下照顾家人。雪莉致力于制定保障带薪病假、带薪家事假和公平安排的法律,起草了美国46个州和地方颁布的带薪病假法律
{"title":"Work-family justice: its meanings and its implementation","authors":"Caitlyn Collins, Ameeta Jaga, Nancy Folbre, M. Rosario Castro Bernardini, Sherry Leiwant, Vicki Shabo, Melissa A. Milkie, Janet Gornick","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2272571","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2272571","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIt's an incredibly important moment to focus on work-family scholarship – and to consider research related to ‘just’ work and care in unsettling and challenging times. Against this backdrop, the 2022 WFRN theme was established. The conference gathered members from around the world toward building impactful scholarship for practices and policy. In this Voices piece, we draw upon WFRN presidential panelists' voices. The first plenary, ‘The Meanings of Work-Family Justice’, provided opportunities for panelists to consider different ways to conceptualize and expand this idea as labor markets, workplaces, and many aspects of people's lives are in flux, with new understandings about how to think expansively about creating ‘work-family justice’, The second plenary – ‘Work-Family Justice on the Ground’ – featured panelists from leading non-profits who discuss how they've met challenges and succeeded in implementing and building policies that create a more just world of work and care. They discuss barriers and some ideas for overcoming difficulties. We conclude by considering the evolving meanings and practices of work-family justice. In all, the voices presented here help us focus on creating more ‘just’ worlds of work and care – a distinct and vital – if sometimes precarious – possibility in this moment.KEYWORDS: Workfamilyjusticecarepolicy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Ideas and excerpts are drawn from related writing (Collins, Citation2019, Citation2020).2 In this section, I present reflections and remarks presented in the WFRN Presidential Plenary: Work-Family Justice on the Ground around major themes proposed by the organizers of the plenary.3 Bringing negative consequences for its beneficiaries4 https://www.abetterbalance.org/resources/report-summary-women-in-the-workforce-nyc/5 https://www.nber.org/papers/w30140Additional informationNotes on contributorsCaitlyn CollinsCaitlyn Collins is Associate Professor of Sociology at Washington University in St. Louis. She conducts cross-national qualitative research on gender inequality at work and in family life. Her first book is Making Motherhood Work: How Women Manage Careers and Caregiving (2019, Princeton University Press).Ameeta JagaAmeeta Jaga (Ph.D.) is Professor of Organisational Psychology in the School of Management Studies at the University of Cape Town and a non-resident fellow with the Hutchins Centre for African and African American Research, Harvard University. She takes a Southern and decolonial approach to address the geopolitics in knowledge production and focuses on a gendered and social class analysis of work-family concerns primarily among low-income mothers. Her work has had policy impact in advancing workplace support for breastfeeding in local government. Ameeta has published widely across disciplines including Gender, Work and Organisation, Work, Employment and Society, International Journal of Human Resource Mana","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136234264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Pandemic impacts, cultural conflicts and moral dilemmas among faculty at a Hispanic-serving research university 流行病的影响,文化冲突和道德困境在一所为西班牙裔服务的研究型大学的教师
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2271644
Mary Blair-Loy, Stephen Reynders, Beth Mitchneck, Avesta Baraki, Rebecca Lewison, John Crockett
ABSTRACTMore research is needed on how the COVID-19 pandemic has shaped professional cultures and its implications for equity and justice. We conducted focus groups with STEM faculty at an exemplar case university, chosen because of its high expectations for research and teaching and its federal designation as a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). We use cultural schemas – which outline core content of professional culture – as analytical lenses. In addition to the schemas of scientific research excellence and devotion identified in previous literature, we find evidence of a cultural schema of radical connection and service to undergraduate students, many of whom are Latinx and in families who faced disproportionately high risks from the pandemic. We argue that work-work conflict and work-family conflict are rooted in cultural schemas of the academic profession that clashed more intensively during the pandemic. These clashes intensify moral dilemmas for faculty and reinforce inequalities and injustices. We urge the federal government to expand the expectations for HSI designation beyond achieving a certain demographic profile to require and equip campuses to fully serve their diverse student bodies and fully sustain the faculty and staff who support them.KEYWORDS: STEM facultyprofessional cultureCOVID-19moral dilemmawork devotionwork-family and work-work conflict Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The National Science Foundation definition of STEM fields includes psychology and the social sciences, in addition to physical sciences, life sciences, and engineering (Granovskiy, Boris. 2018. ‘Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: An Overview.’ U.S. Congressional Research Service, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. 2022. ‘Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2021.’ Alexandria, VA.)2 The case university is designated ‘high research level’ (or R2) by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education and also has a high teaching load and a large, diverse undergraduate enrollment. For more information, see https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/3 Universities and colleges with an undergraduate full-time equivalent enrollment that is at least 25% Latinx may apply to the US Department of Education for HSI designation (https://sites.ed.gov/hispanic-initiative/hispanic-serving-institutions-hsis/). Our case university’s proportion of Latinx students exceeds 34% and has been designated as an Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) for approximately a decade. The student body is approximately 40% first-generation college attending.4 In the early months of the pandemic in 2020, mothers were more likely than fathers to reduce their paid work hours in part to cope with the additional caregiving needs (Landivar et al., Citation2020; Lofton et al., Citation2021; Qian & Fuller, Citation2020). By 2022, women’s empl
摘要COVID-19大流行如何塑造职业文化及其对公平和正义的影响,需要更多的研究。我们与一所模范大学的STEM教师进行了焦点小组讨论,选择这所大学是因为它对研究和教学的高期望,以及它被联邦政府指定为西班牙裔服务机构(HSI)。我们使用概述专业文化核心内容的文化图式作为分析镜头。除了在以前的文献中确定的卓越科研和奉献精神的模式外,我们还发现了一种对本科生的激进联系和服务的文化模式的证据,其中许多学生是拉丁裔,并且来自面临大流行风险过高的家庭。我们认为,工作-工作冲突和工作-家庭冲突根植于学术职业的文化模式,在疫情期间冲突更为激烈。这些冲突加剧了教师的道德困境,加剧了不平等和不公正。我们敦促联邦政府扩大对HSI指定的期望,而不仅仅是达到一定的人口统计概况,要求和装备校园,以充分服务于他们多样化的学生群体,并充分支持支持他们的教职员工。关键词:STEM教师职业文化道德困境工作奉献工作家庭工作冲突披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1美国国家科学基金会对STEM领域的定义除了包括物理科学、生命科学和工程学外,还包括心理学和社会科学(Granovskiy, Boris. 2018)。科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育:概述。美国国会研究处,国家科学与工程统计中心,国家科学基金会,2022年。美国大学博士学位获得者:2021年。2 case大学被卡内基高等教育机构分类指定为“高研究水平”(或R2),教学负担高,本科招生规模大,种类多样。欲了解更多信息,请参阅https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/3拉丁裔占25%以上的本科全日制大学和学院可以向美国教育部申请HSI指定(https://sites.ed.gov/hispanic-initiative/hispanic-serving-institutions-hsis/)。我们的案例大学的拉丁裔学生的比例超过34%,并已被指定为西班牙裔服务机构(HSI)大约十年。大约40%的学生是第一代大学生在2020年大流行的最初几个月,母亲比父亲更有可能减少带薪工作时间,部分原因是为了应对额外的照顾需求(Landivar等人,Citation2020;洛夫顿等人,Citation2021;Qian & Fuller, Citation2020)。到2022年,美国女性就业率普遍恢复到疫情前的水平,但由于学校和日托中心的持续中断,许多幼儿母亲继续面临工作与家庭的冲突和不确定性这些模式很复杂;文章投稿中的性别比例因学科和其他因素而异(Jemielniak等人,Citation2022;Muric等人,Citation2021;美国国家科学院,医学博士。(2021)。COVID-19对学术科学、工程和医学领域女性职业生涯的影响。国家科学院出版社。https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/26061)例如,一项关于向美国地球物理联合会期刊提交的地球和空间科学的研究(2018-2021年)在大流行期间有所增加,而性别比例保持不变。作者推测,在全职工作期间,科学家们倾向于撰写之前实地工作的结果,并且未来提交的性别比例可能会发生变化(Wooden & Hanson, Citation2022)我们得到了最后一位作者所在大学的机构审查委员会的批准在我们的研究中,没有一个教员自认为是非二元的。该大学的STEM和SBS教师中约有三分之一是女性在我们的案例大学中,4%的教师是黑人,与这个群体在全国学术STEM劳动力中的比例相当。白人和亚裔教授分别占该大学教师总数的62%和11%。这些统计数据与我们收集焦点小组数据的学期相匹配。这些比例低于全国水平,白人占70%,亚洲人占20% (https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/report/academic-careers) (NCSES, Citation2021)附录表格提供了按性别分列的行百分比,以显示每个工作或家庭类别中由妇女和男子组成的比例。 例如,在数据中,女性在两个级别中都占80%左右(83%的助理教授和79%的终身教授),而男性在每个级别中所占的比例在17%到21%之间,大致等于她们在整个样本中的比例(附录表1A)有关这些指定的更多信息,请参阅这些联邦指定,请参阅https://www.doi.gov/pmb/eeo/doi-minority-serving-institutions-program.11: https://www.edexcelencia.org/seal-excelencia12主持人灵活地遵循这个半结构化指南,同时也允许对话向新的方向展开。没有时间问每个焦点小组的每个问题。本研究由国家科学基金资助(编号2017570、2017612和2003030)。本材料中表达的任何观点、发现、结论或建议都是作者的观点,并不一定反映美国国家科学基金会的观点。作者简介:mary blair - loyy(她/她)是加州大学圣地亚哥分校的社会学教授。她用多种方法研究性别、工作和家庭。许多学术研究强调个人的战略权衡或偏见。她在2022年获奖的著作《https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo161019313》(与艾琳·a·切赫合作)使用多种证据表明,STEM领域的职业文化模式被广泛接受,但却加剧了性别和种族不平等,并损害了科学。她正在合作撰写一份美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院共识报告,内容是如何改善对承担家庭护理责任的科学家的支持。Stephen Reynders是加州大学圣地亚哥分校社会与科学研究系的博士生。他的研究考察了学术STEM的专业文化如何影响组织增加多样性的努力。他最近在《微生物学趋势》(细胞出版社,2023年)上与Mary Blair-Loy和Erin A.切赫合著了一篇题为“生产力指标和招聘规则被文化模式扭曲”的文章。Beth Mitchneck是亚利桑那大学地理、发展与环境学院的名誉教授。她的主要研究领域是学术界的性别平等和暴力冲突中的国内流离失所者。她发表的作品包括“评估西班牙裔服务机构的服务制度变革”(2023年,泰勒和弗朗西斯),以及变革的秘诀:创建一个更具包容性的学院(2016年科学)。Avesta Baraki(她/她/她)(喀布尔大学文学学士,圣地亚哥大学文学硕士)担任圣地亚哥州立大学研究进步分析师,以及SDSU-UCSD多校园转型和公平网络(MCTEN)的项目协调员。Baraki女士一直在利用她的专业知识和教育专业知识为代表性不足的教师开发和识别机会,并促进校园的多样性,公平性和包容性(DEI)。她一直致力于妇女赋权、多元化和平等项目,并努力使边缘化社区更容易接受高等教育。丽贝卡·刘易斯是圣地亚哥州立大学的生物学教授。她的主要研究领域是气候适应能力,气候准备和应用保护科学。在过去的10年里,刘易森博士一直在科罗拉多州立大学和加州大学校园领导NSF ADVANCE和相关计划。John Crockett是圣地亚哥州立大学研究与创新部门负责研究进展的助理副总裁。他的职责范围包括关注整个研究界的发现和创新愿望,包括教职员工、
{"title":"Pandemic impacts, cultural conflicts and moral dilemmas among faculty at a Hispanic-serving research university","authors":"Mary Blair-Loy, Stephen Reynders, Beth Mitchneck, Avesta Baraki, Rebecca Lewison, John Crockett","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2271644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2271644","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMore research is needed on how the COVID-19 pandemic has shaped professional cultures and its implications for equity and justice. We conducted focus groups with STEM faculty at an exemplar case university, chosen because of its high expectations for research and teaching and its federal designation as a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). We use cultural schemas – which outline core content of professional culture – as analytical lenses. In addition to the schemas of scientific research excellence and devotion identified in previous literature, we find evidence of a cultural schema of radical connection and service to undergraduate students, many of whom are Latinx and in families who faced disproportionately high risks from the pandemic. We argue that work-work conflict and work-family conflict are rooted in cultural schemas of the academic profession that clashed more intensively during the pandemic. These clashes intensify moral dilemmas for faculty and reinforce inequalities and injustices. We urge the federal government to expand the expectations for HSI designation beyond achieving a certain demographic profile to require and equip campuses to fully serve their diverse student bodies and fully sustain the faculty and staff who support them.KEYWORDS: STEM facultyprofessional cultureCOVID-19moral dilemmawork devotionwork-family and work-work conflict Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The National Science Foundation definition of STEM fields includes psychology and the social sciences, in addition to physical sciences, life sciences, and engineering (Granovskiy, Boris. 2018. ‘Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: An Overview.’ U.S. Congressional Research Service, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. 2022. ‘Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2021.’ Alexandria, VA.)2 The case university is designated ‘high research level’ (or R2) by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education and also has a high teaching load and a large, diverse undergraduate enrollment. For more information, see https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/3 Universities and colleges with an undergraduate full-time equivalent enrollment that is at least 25% Latinx may apply to the US Department of Education for HSI designation (https://sites.ed.gov/hispanic-initiative/hispanic-serving-institutions-hsis/). Our case university’s proportion of Latinx students exceeds 34% and has been designated as an Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) for approximately a decade. The student body is approximately 40% first-generation college attending.4 In the early months of the pandemic in 2020, mothers were more likely than fathers to reduce their paid work hours in part to cope with the additional caregiving needs (Landivar et al., Citation2020; Lofton et al., Citation2021; Qian & Fuller, Citation2020). By 2022, women’s empl","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136376193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
More than employment policies? Parental leaves, flexible work and fathers’ participation in unpaid care work 不仅仅是就业政策?育儿假、弹性工作和父亲参与无薪照顾工作
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2271646
Kim de Laat, Andrea Doucet, Alyssa Gerhardt
ABSTRACT This article explores two policy pathways – parental leave and flexible work –as complementary policy interventions aimed at promoting gender equality in unpaid care and household work. Drawing on Canadian data from the 2021 International Familydemic Survey, we examine the relationship between fathers’ previous use of parental leave, and current use of flexible work arrangements (flextime and remote work), and their involvement in unpaid care work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings support the following three arguments: First, in numerous countries, including Canada, where socially exclusive policy designs can limit fathers’ take up of parental leave, flexible work arrangements can provide additional opportunities to increase fathering involvement beyond the early months of parenting. Second, our data indicate that unpaid care work sharing is enhanced by fathers’ parental leaves and flexible working; however, fathers who have taken parental leave report dividing a wider set of household work and care tasks with their partners. Third, although their policy designs, aims, and legislation architectures differ in Canada, we maintain that parental leaves and flexible work arrangements are both more than employment policies; they are care/work policies that enact ‘social care’ and ‘democratic care’, and support gender equality and work-family justice goals.
{"title":"More than employment policies? Parental leaves, flexible work and fathers’ participation in unpaid care work","authors":"Kim de Laat, Andrea Doucet, Alyssa Gerhardt","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2271646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2271646","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores two policy pathways – parental leave and flexible work –as complementary policy interventions aimed at promoting gender equality in unpaid care and household work. Drawing on Canadian data from the 2021 International Familydemic Survey, we examine the relationship between fathers’ previous use of parental leave, and current use of flexible work arrangements (flextime and remote work), and their involvement in unpaid care work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings support the following three arguments: First, in numerous countries, including Canada, where socially exclusive policy designs can limit fathers’ take up of parental leave, flexible work arrangements can provide additional opportunities to increase fathering involvement beyond the early months of parenting. Second, our data indicate that unpaid care work sharing is enhanced by fathers’ parental leaves and flexible working; however, fathers who have taken parental leave report dividing a wider set of household work and care tasks with their partners. Third, although their policy designs, aims, and legislation architectures differ in Canada, we maintain that parental leaves and flexible work arrangements are both more than employment policies; they are care/work policies that enact ‘social care’ and ‘democratic care’, and support gender equality and work-family justice goals.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134906807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
What do prospective parents know about family welfare incentives? Evidence from Hungary and the United States 准父母对家庭福利激励了解多少?来自匈牙利和美国的证据
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2268816
Erica Mildner
ABSTRACTCountries facing population decline have increasingly turned to family welfare incentives to encourage higher fertility. Quantitative analyses have revealed mixed evidence that these policies are effective. However, it remains unknown how much individuals know about their countries' family welfare policies. The extent of men’s welfare knowledge in particular remains unexamined. Relying on 26 interviews with prospective parents in Hungary (N = 11) and the US (N = 15), this study examines what knowledge prospective parents have of family welfare policies in two distinct welfare contexts: Hungary, where certain individuals are heavily rewarded for having three or more children, and the US, where individuals do not receive significant financial support for having any number of children. Findings from this study demonstrate how policy knowledge is shaped by the public versus private nature of the welfare state. This study also reveals how policy measures can shape the gendered division of labor years before a child is born – a fruitful area for future research.KEYWORDS: Family welfarepolicy knowledgegender equitycross-nationalparenthood Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 There are a limited series of Nordic studies on men’s fertility awareness in family planning (Bodin et al., Citation2017; Schmidt et al., Citation2022), but none to date on men’s awareness of government family welfare incentives.2 Hungary does have a protected five days of paid leave that fathers can take after the birth of a child but this is not referred to as a separate paternity leave (Gábos & Makay, Citation2022, p. 274).3 The California survey also found that Latino respondents had less awareness of the state’s paid family leave law than non-Latino counterparts.4 Though I posted on social media groups targeted to New York residents, two respondents had moved to Austin, Texas and one to Chicago, Illinois at the time of the interview. As these cities are major urban centers with similar socio-political environments, I retained these interviews in the final sample. Texas and Illinois do have different family welfare policy offerings than New York. However, this study focuses on respondents’ knowledge of federal, state, and employer family supports, rather than actual policy offerings.5 The Hungarian and US samples were not limited by age, though the median age in each sample was 26 years old.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Central European University.Notes on contributorsErica MildnerErica Mildner is a PhD candidate in sociology at the University of British Columbia. She received her MA in Gender Studies from Central European University. Her research focuses on gender, labor, and family welfare policies.
人口下降的国家越来越多地转向家庭福利激励来鼓励更高的生育率。定量分析显示,这些政策是有效的,证据不一。然而,目前还不清楚个人对他们国家的家庭福利政策了解多少。特别是男性福利知识的程度仍未得到检验。通过对匈牙利(N = 11)和美国(N = 15)的26位准父母的访谈,本研究考察了两种不同福利背景下准父母对家庭福利政策的了解程度:匈牙利,某些人因为生三个或更多孩子而获得高额奖励,而美国,个人因为生任何数量的孩子而得不到显著的经济支持。这项研究的结果表明,福利国家的公共与私人性质是如何塑造政策知识的。这项研究还揭示了政策措施如何在孩子出生前几年塑造性别劳动分工——这是未来研究的一个富有成果的领域。关键词:家庭福利政策知识性别平等跨国父母披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1北欧关于计划生育中男性生育意识的研究有限(Bodin et al., Citation2017;Schmidt et al., Citation2022),但迄今为止没有关于男性对政府家庭福利激励的认识匈牙利确实有受保护的五天带薪假期,父亲可以在孩子出生后休假,但这并不被称为单独的陪产假(Gábos & Makay, Citation2022, p. 274)加州的调查还发现,拉丁裔受访者对该州带薪家庭假法律的了解程度低于非拉丁裔受访者虽然我在针对纽约居民的社交媒体群上发帖,但在采访时,两位受访者已经搬到了德克萨斯州的奥斯汀,一位搬到了伊利诺伊州的芝加哥。由于这些城市都是具有相似社会政治环境的主要城市中心,我在最后的样本中保留了这些采访。德克萨斯州和伊利诺伊州的家庭福利政策确实与纽约州不同。然而,本研究关注的是受访者对联邦、州和雇主家庭支持的了解,而不是实际的政策提供匈牙利和美国的样本不受年龄的限制,尽管每个样本的中位年龄都是26岁。本研究得到了中欧大学的支持。作者简介erica Mildner,英属哥伦比亚大学社会学博士研究生。她获得中欧大学性别研究硕士学位。她的研究重点是性别、劳动和家庭福利政策。
{"title":"What do prospective parents know about family welfare incentives? Evidence from Hungary and the United States","authors":"Erica Mildner","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2268816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2268816","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTCountries facing population decline have increasingly turned to family welfare incentives to encourage higher fertility. Quantitative analyses have revealed mixed evidence that these policies are effective. However, it remains unknown how much individuals know about their countries' family welfare policies. The extent of men’s welfare knowledge in particular remains unexamined. Relying on 26 interviews with prospective parents in Hungary (N = 11) and the US (N = 15), this study examines what knowledge prospective parents have of family welfare policies in two distinct welfare contexts: Hungary, where certain individuals are heavily rewarded for having three or more children, and the US, where individuals do not receive significant financial support for having any number of children. Findings from this study demonstrate how policy knowledge is shaped by the public versus private nature of the welfare state. This study also reveals how policy measures can shape the gendered division of labor years before a child is born – a fruitful area for future research.KEYWORDS: Family welfarepolicy knowledgegender equitycross-nationalparenthood Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 There are a limited series of Nordic studies on men’s fertility awareness in family planning (Bodin et al., Citation2017; Schmidt et al., Citation2022), but none to date on men’s awareness of government family welfare incentives.2 Hungary does have a protected five days of paid leave that fathers can take after the birth of a child but this is not referred to as a separate paternity leave (Gábos & Makay, Citation2022, p. 274).3 The California survey also found that Latino respondents had less awareness of the state’s paid family leave law than non-Latino counterparts.4 Though I posted on social media groups targeted to New York residents, two respondents had moved to Austin, Texas and one to Chicago, Illinois at the time of the interview. As these cities are major urban centers with similar socio-political environments, I retained these interviews in the final sample. Texas and Illinois do have different family welfare policy offerings than New York. However, this study focuses on respondents’ knowledge of federal, state, and employer family supports, rather than actual policy offerings.5 The Hungarian and US samples were not limited by age, though the median age in each sample was 26 years old.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Central European University.Notes on contributorsErica MildnerErica Mildner is a PhD candidate in sociology at the University of British Columbia. She received her MA in Gender Studies from Central European University. Her research focuses on gender, labor, and family welfare policies.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135266026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Community Work & Family
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1