Pub Date : 2023-12-04DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2284114
Malissa A. Clark, Jenell L. S. Wittmer, Angie Jones
Family business leaders are heavily devoted to their business, but to what degree does this manifest as workaholism? To examine this question, a mixed methods approach was used which included onlin...
{"title":"When business is personal: a mixed methods examination of workaholism in family business leaders","authors":"Malissa A. Clark, Jenell L. S. Wittmer, Angie Jones","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2284114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2284114","url":null,"abstract":"Family business leaders are heavily devoted to their business, but to what degree does this manifest as workaholism? To examine this question, a mixed methods approach was used which included onlin...","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-04DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2287956
Edel Walsh, Aileen Murphy
Families where both parents are employed outside the home are now commonplace. Having multiple life roles can be enriching however, as gender equality isn’t guaranteed, the well-being impacts may m...
{"title":"Work hours, job characteristics and life satisfaction among working mothers and fathers","authors":"Edel Walsh, Aileen Murphy","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2287956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2287956","url":null,"abstract":"Families where both parents are employed outside the home are now commonplace. Having multiple life roles can be enriching however, as gender equality isn’t guaranteed, the well-being impacts may m...","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-24DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2275975
Melissa A. Milkie, Heejung Chung, Ameeta Jaga
Work-family justice is a key organizing concept centering intellectual and policy work that calls attention to tensions and challenges in work and family integration and highlights key solutions. T...
{"title":"Work-family justice – meanings and possibilities: introduction to the work and family researchers network special issue","authors":"Melissa A. Milkie, Heejung Chung, Ameeta Jaga","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2275975","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2275975","url":null,"abstract":"Work-family justice is a key organizing concept centering intellectual and policy work that calls attention to tensions and challenges in work and family integration and highlights key solutions. T...","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-20DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2282356
Giovanni Amerigo Giuliani, Nicola De Luigi
The article investigates in-work poverty (IWP) in Italy through the lens of family policies. Adopting a longitudinal perspective, the work scrutinizes whether and to what extent the configuration o...
{"title":"In-work poverty and family policy in Italy: from a frozen to a thawing landscape?","authors":"Giovanni Amerigo Giuliani, Nicola De Luigi","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2282356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2282356","url":null,"abstract":"The article investigates in-work poverty (IWP) in Italy through the lens of family policies. Adopting a longitudinal perspective, the work scrutinizes whether and to what extent the configuration o...","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-06DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2277119
Nicole Dillard, Taylor Cavallo
ABSTRACTWithin the US, recent calls for greater work-family justice have not only forced organizations to re-conceptualize work, but to re-define the role of organizations themselves. This shift has been striking during times of socio-political change as demonstrated most recently by organizational responses to the reversal of Roe v. Wade, with many companies pledging funding for birthing people seeking abortions. While this type of support is valuable, the singular focus on abortion rights within the reproductive justice context minimizes the scope of its intersectional legacy.The purpose of this paper is to advocate for the organizational application of a comprehensive framework for reproductive justice (CFRJ) guided by intersectional Black Feminist epistemology. We will show that many US organizations have already engaged in reproductive justice by weaving together a mosaic of three socio-political moments (the pathway to marriage equality, restrictive immigration policies and COVID-19), that garnered organizational support and advocacy. These moments reflect the comprehensive nature of reproductive justice as conceived by the Black Feminists who originated the term. These ‘turning points’ demonstrate the organization’s capacity for leadership during times of crisis. The paper concludes with recommendations that explore potential pathways for moving forward in supporting work-family and reproductive justice within organizations.KEYWORDS: Black Feminismorganizationsreproductive justiceHRDwork-family justice Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNicole DillardNicole Dillard (she/her/hers) is an Assistant Professor in the Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development (OLPD) department at the University of Minnesota. Dr. Dillard's primary research explores the work and organizational experiences of individuals with marginalized social identities.Taylor CavalloTaylor Cavallo (she/her/hers) is a PhD student in the Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development (OLPD) department at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests are focused on the intersection of labor and gender with an emphasis on the experiences of work and motherhood for millennial women.
在美国,最近对工作与家庭公平的呼声不仅迫使组织重新定义工作,而且重新定义组织本身的角色。这种转变在社会政治变革时期尤为显著,最近对罗伊诉韦德案(Roe v. Wade)逆转的组织反应就证明了这一点,许多公司承诺为寻求堕胎的孕妇提供资金。虽然这种支持是有价值的,但在生殖正义背景下对堕胎权利的单一关注使其交叉遗产的范围最小化。本文的目的是倡导以交叉黑人女性主义认识论为指导的生殖正义综合框架(CFRJ)的组织应用。我们将展示,许多美国组织已经通过将三个社会政治时刻(通往婚姻平等的道路、限制性移民政策和COVID-19)交织在一起,获得了组织的支持和倡导,从而参与了生殖正义。这些时刻反映了黑人女权主义者所构想的生殖正义的全面性。这些“转折点”表明了该组织在危机时期的领导能力。论文最后提出了一些建议,探讨了在组织内支持工作-家庭和生殖正义的潜在途径。关键词:黑人女权主义组织生殖正义工作家庭正义披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。nicole Dillard(她/她/她的)是明尼苏达大学组织领导、政策与发展(OLPD)系的助理教授。迪拉德博士的主要研究探索了具有边缘社会身份的个人的工作和组织经历。泰勒·卡瓦洛(她/她/她的)是明尼苏达大学组织领导、政策与发展(OLPD)系的一名博士生。她的研究兴趣集中在劳动和性别的交叉点,重点是千禧一代女性的工作和母性经验。
{"title":"Beyond the womb: a mosaic of organizational advocacy for reproductive justice","authors":"Nicole Dillard, Taylor Cavallo","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2277119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2277119","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWithin the US, recent calls for greater work-family justice have not only forced organizations to re-conceptualize work, but to re-define the role of organizations themselves. This shift has been striking during times of socio-political change as demonstrated most recently by organizational responses to the reversal of Roe v. Wade, with many companies pledging funding for birthing people seeking abortions. While this type of support is valuable, the singular focus on abortion rights within the reproductive justice context minimizes the scope of its intersectional legacy.The purpose of this paper is to advocate for the organizational application of a comprehensive framework for reproductive justice (CFRJ) guided by intersectional Black Feminist epistemology. We will show that many US organizations have already engaged in reproductive justice by weaving together a mosaic of three socio-political moments (the pathway to marriage equality, restrictive immigration policies and COVID-19), that garnered organizational support and advocacy. These moments reflect the comprehensive nature of reproductive justice as conceived by the Black Feminists who originated the term. These ‘turning points’ demonstrate the organization’s capacity for leadership during times of crisis. The paper concludes with recommendations that explore potential pathways for moving forward in supporting work-family and reproductive justice within organizations.KEYWORDS: Black Feminismorganizationsreproductive justiceHRDwork-family justice Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNicole DillardNicole Dillard (she/her/hers) is an Assistant Professor in the Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development (OLPD) department at the University of Minnesota. Dr. Dillard's primary research explores the work and organizational experiences of individuals with marginalized social identities.Taylor CavalloTaylor Cavallo (she/her/hers) is a PhD student in the Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development (OLPD) department at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests are focused on the intersection of labor and gender with an emphasis on the experiences of work and motherhood for millennial women.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135678784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-31DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2274276
Jamie Atkinson
The introduction of Shared Parental Leave (SPL) in the UK provided an opportunity for more fathers to take time out of work to be primary carers. The article presents the findings from qualitative interviews carried out with ten British fathers, which analyses their experiences of requesting SPL and the level of organizational support available to them on taking leave. In terms of requesting SPL and on their return to work, two approaches are discernible: these are described as ‘cautious’ and ‘bold’. Although maintaining their commitment to being involved parents, cautious fathers tended to conform to the ideal worker norm. They did so by adopting strategies to mitigate any anticipated career penalty, which included adjusting the timing and length of their leave. Thus the values associated with the ideal worker norm represent a psychological barrier to fathers who might otherwise want to take a longer period of leave or adjust their working hours post-leave. By contrast, bold fathers are less concerned about accommodating their employer's needs in requesting SPL and are prepared to adjust their working hours to facilitate involved fatherhood. The article concludes by considering appropriate responses for policymakers, fathers and organizations.
{"title":"Reconciling the ideal worker norm and involved fatherhood: new fathers’ experiences of requesting Shared Parental Leave in UK organizations","authors":"Jamie Atkinson","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2274276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2274276","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of Shared Parental Leave (SPL) in the UK provided an opportunity for more fathers to take time out of work to be primary carers. The article presents the findings from qualitative interviews carried out with ten British fathers, which analyses their experiences of requesting SPL and the level of organizational support available to them on taking leave. In terms of requesting SPL and on their return to work, two approaches are discernible: these are described as ‘cautious’ and ‘bold’. Although maintaining their commitment to being involved parents, cautious fathers tended to conform to the ideal worker norm. They did so by adopting strategies to mitigate any anticipated career penalty, which included adjusting the timing and length of their leave. Thus the values associated with the ideal worker norm represent a psychological barrier to fathers who might otherwise want to take a longer period of leave or adjust their working hours post-leave. By contrast, bold fathers are less concerned about accommodating their employer's needs in requesting SPL and are prepared to adjust their working hours to facilitate involved fatherhood. The article concludes by considering appropriate responses for policymakers, fathers and organizations.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135814125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-27DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2272571
Caitlyn Collins, Ameeta Jaga, Nancy Folbre, M. Rosario Castro Bernardini, Sherry Leiwant, Vicki Shabo, Melissa A. Milkie, Janet Gornick
ABSTRACTIt's an incredibly important moment to focus on work-family scholarship – and to consider research related to ‘just’ work and care in unsettling and challenging times. Against this backdrop, the 2022 WFRN theme was established. The conference gathered members from around the world toward building impactful scholarship for practices and policy. In this Voices piece, we draw upon WFRN presidential panelists' voices. The first plenary, ‘The Meanings of Work-Family Justice’, provided opportunities for panelists to consider different ways to conceptualize and expand this idea as labor markets, workplaces, and many aspects of people's lives are in flux, with new understandings about how to think expansively about creating ‘work-family justice’, The second plenary – ‘Work-Family Justice on the Ground’ – featured panelists from leading non-profits who discuss how they've met challenges and succeeded in implementing and building policies that create a more just world of work and care. They discuss barriers and some ideas for overcoming difficulties. We conclude by considering the evolving meanings and practices of work-family justice. In all, the voices presented here help us focus on creating more ‘just’ worlds of work and care – a distinct and vital – if sometimes precarious – possibility in this moment.KEYWORDS: Workfamilyjusticecarepolicy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Ideas and excerpts are drawn from related writing (Collins, Citation2019, Citation2020).2 In this section, I present reflections and remarks presented in the WFRN Presidential Plenary: Work-Family Justice on the Ground around major themes proposed by the organizers of the plenary.3 Bringing negative consequences for its beneficiaries4 https://www.abetterbalance.org/resources/report-summary-women-in-the-workforce-nyc/5 https://www.nber.org/papers/w30140Additional informationNotes on contributorsCaitlyn CollinsCaitlyn Collins is Associate Professor of Sociology at Washington University in St. Louis. She conducts cross-national qualitative research on gender inequality at work and in family life. Her first book is Making Motherhood Work: How Women Manage Careers and Caregiving (2019, Princeton University Press).Ameeta JagaAmeeta Jaga (Ph.D.) is Professor of Organisational Psychology in the School of Management Studies at the University of Cape Town and a non-resident fellow with the Hutchins Centre for African and African American Research, Harvard University. She takes a Southern and decolonial approach to address the geopolitics in knowledge production and focuses on a gendered and social class analysis of work-family concerns primarily among low-income mothers. Her work has had policy impact in advancing workplace support for breastfeeding in local government. Ameeta has published widely across disciplines including Gender, Work and Organisation, Work, Employment and Society, International Journal of Human Resource Mana
{"title":"Work-family justice: its meanings and its implementation","authors":"Caitlyn Collins, Ameeta Jaga, Nancy Folbre, M. Rosario Castro Bernardini, Sherry Leiwant, Vicki Shabo, Melissa A. Milkie, Janet Gornick","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2272571","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2272571","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIt's an incredibly important moment to focus on work-family scholarship – and to consider research related to ‘just’ work and care in unsettling and challenging times. Against this backdrop, the 2022 WFRN theme was established. The conference gathered members from around the world toward building impactful scholarship for practices and policy. In this Voices piece, we draw upon WFRN presidential panelists' voices. The first plenary, ‘The Meanings of Work-Family Justice’, provided opportunities for panelists to consider different ways to conceptualize and expand this idea as labor markets, workplaces, and many aspects of people's lives are in flux, with new understandings about how to think expansively about creating ‘work-family justice’, The second plenary – ‘Work-Family Justice on the Ground’ – featured panelists from leading non-profits who discuss how they've met challenges and succeeded in implementing and building policies that create a more just world of work and care. They discuss barriers and some ideas for overcoming difficulties. We conclude by considering the evolving meanings and practices of work-family justice. In all, the voices presented here help us focus on creating more ‘just’ worlds of work and care – a distinct and vital – if sometimes precarious – possibility in this moment.KEYWORDS: Workfamilyjusticecarepolicy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Ideas and excerpts are drawn from related writing (Collins, Citation2019, Citation2020).2 In this section, I present reflections and remarks presented in the WFRN Presidential Plenary: Work-Family Justice on the Ground around major themes proposed by the organizers of the plenary.3 Bringing negative consequences for its beneficiaries4 https://www.abetterbalance.org/resources/report-summary-women-in-the-workforce-nyc/5 https://www.nber.org/papers/w30140Additional informationNotes on contributorsCaitlyn CollinsCaitlyn Collins is Associate Professor of Sociology at Washington University in St. Louis. She conducts cross-national qualitative research on gender inequality at work and in family life. Her first book is Making Motherhood Work: How Women Manage Careers and Caregiving (2019, Princeton University Press).Ameeta JagaAmeeta Jaga (Ph.D.) is Professor of Organisational Psychology in the School of Management Studies at the University of Cape Town and a non-resident fellow with the Hutchins Centre for African and African American Research, Harvard University. She takes a Southern and decolonial approach to address the geopolitics in knowledge production and focuses on a gendered and social class analysis of work-family concerns primarily among low-income mothers. Her work has had policy impact in advancing workplace support for breastfeeding in local government. Ameeta has published widely across disciplines including Gender, Work and Organisation, Work, Employment and Society, International Journal of Human Resource Mana","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136234264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-26DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2271644
Mary Blair-Loy, Stephen Reynders, Beth Mitchneck, Avesta Baraki, Rebecca Lewison, John Crockett
ABSTRACTMore research is needed on how the COVID-19 pandemic has shaped professional cultures and its implications for equity and justice. We conducted focus groups with STEM faculty at an exemplar case university, chosen because of its high expectations for research and teaching and its federal designation as a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). We use cultural schemas – which outline core content of professional culture – as analytical lenses. In addition to the schemas of scientific research excellence and devotion identified in previous literature, we find evidence of a cultural schema of radical connection and service to undergraduate students, many of whom are Latinx and in families who faced disproportionately high risks from the pandemic. We argue that work-work conflict and work-family conflict are rooted in cultural schemas of the academic profession that clashed more intensively during the pandemic. These clashes intensify moral dilemmas for faculty and reinforce inequalities and injustices. We urge the federal government to expand the expectations for HSI designation beyond achieving a certain demographic profile to require and equip campuses to fully serve their diverse student bodies and fully sustain the faculty and staff who support them.KEYWORDS: STEM facultyprofessional cultureCOVID-19moral dilemmawork devotionwork-family and work-work conflict Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The National Science Foundation definition of STEM fields includes psychology and the social sciences, in addition to physical sciences, life sciences, and engineering (Granovskiy, Boris. 2018. ‘Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: An Overview.’ U.S. Congressional Research Service, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. 2022. ‘Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2021.’ Alexandria, VA.)2 The case university is designated ‘high research level’ (or R2) by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education and also has a high teaching load and a large, diverse undergraduate enrollment. For more information, see https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/3 Universities and colleges with an undergraduate full-time equivalent enrollment that is at least 25% Latinx may apply to the US Department of Education for HSI designation (https://sites.ed.gov/hispanic-initiative/hispanic-serving-institutions-hsis/). Our case university’s proportion of Latinx students exceeds 34% and has been designated as an Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) for approximately a decade. The student body is approximately 40% first-generation college attending.4 In the early months of the pandemic in 2020, mothers were more likely than fathers to reduce their paid work hours in part to cope with the additional caregiving needs (Landivar et al., Citation2020; Lofton et al., Citation2021; Qian & Fuller, Citation2020). By 2022, women’s empl
{"title":"Pandemic impacts, cultural conflicts and moral dilemmas among faculty at a Hispanic-serving research university","authors":"Mary Blair-Loy, Stephen Reynders, Beth Mitchneck, Avesta Baraki, Rebecca Lewison, John Crockett","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2271644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2271644","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMore research is needed on how the COVID-19 pandemic has shaped professional cultures and its implications for equity and justice. We conducted focus groups with STEM faculty at an exemplar case university, chosen because of its high expectations for research and teaching and its federal designation as a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). We use cultural schemas – which outline core content of professional culture – as analytical lenses. In addition to the schemas of scientific research excellence and devotion identified in previous literature, we find evidence of a cultural schema of radical connection and service to undergraduate students, many of whom are Latinx and in families who faced disproportionately high risks from the pandemic. We argue that work-work conflict and work-family conflict are rooted in cultural schemas of the academic profession that clashed more intensively during the pandemic. These clashes intensify moral dilemmas for faculty and reinforce inequalities and injustices. We urge the federal government to expand the expectations for HSI designation beyond achieving a certain demographic profile to require and equip campuses to fully serve their diverse student bodies and fully sustain the faculty and staff who support them.KEYWORDS: STEM facultyprofessional cultureCOVID-19moral dilemmawork devotionwork-family and work-work conflict Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The National Science Foundation definition of STEM fields includes psychology and the social sciences, in addition to physical sciences, life sciences, and engineering (Granovskiy, Boris. 2018. ‘Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: An Overview.’ U.S. Congressional Research Service, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. 2022. ‘Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2021.’ Alexandria, VA.)2 The case university is designated ‘high research level’ (or R2) by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education and also has a high teaching load and a large, diverse undergraduate enrollment. For more information, see https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/3 Universities and colleges with an undergraduate full-time equivalent enrollment that is at least 25% Latinx may apply to the US Department of Education for HSI designation (https://sites.ed.gov/hispanic-initiative/hispanic-serving-institutions-hsis/). Our case university’s proportion of Latinx students exceeds 34% and has been designated as an Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) for approximately a decade. The student body is approximately 40% first-generation college attending.4 In the early months of the pandemic in 2020, mothers were more likely than fathers to reduce their paid work hours in part to cope with the additional caregiving needs (Landivar et al., Citation2020; Lofton et al., Citation2021; Qian & Fuller, Citation2020). By 2022, women’s empl","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136376193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-26DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2271646
Kim de Laat, Andrea Doucet, Alyssa Gerhardt
ABSTRACT This article explores two policy pathways – parental leave and flexible work –as complementary policy interventions aimed at promoting gender equality in unpaid care and household work. Drawing on Canadian data from the 2021 International Familydemic Survey, we examine the relationship between fathers’ previous use of parental leave, and current use of flexible work arrangements (flextime and remote work), and their involvement in unpaid care work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings support the following three arguments: First, in numerous countries, including Canada, where socially exclusive policy designs can limit fathers’ take up of parental leave, flexible work arrangements can provide additional opportunities to increase fathering involvement beyond the early months of parenting. Second, our data indicate that unpaid care work sharing is enhanced by fathers’ parental leaves and flexible working; however, fathers who have taken parental leave report dividing a wider set of household work and care tasks with their partners. Third, although their policy designs, aims, and legislation architectures differ in Canada, we maintain that parental leaves and flexible work arrangements are both more than employment policies; they are care/work policies that enact ‘social care’ and ‘democratic care’, and support gender equality and work-family justice goals.
{"title":"More than employment policies? Parental leaves, flexible work and fathers’ participation in unpaid care work","authors":"Kim de Laat, Andrea Doucet, Alyssa Gerhardt","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2271646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2271646","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores two policy pathways – parental leave and flexible work –as complementary policy interventions aimed at promoting gender equality in unpaid care and household work. Drawing on Canadian data from the 2021 International Familydemic Survey, we examine the relationship between fathers’ previous use of parental leave, and current use of flexible work arrangements (flextime and remote work), and their involvement in unpaid care work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings support the following three arguments: First, in numerous countries, including Canada, where socially exclusive policy designs can limit fathers’ take up of parental leave, flexible work arrangements can provide additional opportunities to increase fathering involvement beyond the early months of parenting. Second, our data indicate that unpaid care work sharing is enhanced by fathers’ parental leaves and flexible working; however, fathers who have taken parental leave report dividing a wider set of household work and care tasks with their partners. Third, although their policy designs, aims, and legislation architectures differ in Canada, we maintain that parental leaves and flexible work arrangements are both more than employment policies; they are care/work policies that enact ‘social care’ and ‘democratic care’, and support gender equality and work-family justice goals.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134906807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-24DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2023.2268816
Erica Mildner
ABSTRACTCountries facing population decline have increasingly turned to family welfare incentives to encourage higher fertility. Quantitative analyses have revealed mixed evidence that these policies are effective. However, it remains unknown how much individuals know about their countries' family welfare policies. The extent of men’s welfare knowledge in particular remains unexamined. Relying on 26 interviews with prospective parents in Hungary (N = 11) and the US (N = 15), this study examines what knowledge prospective parents have of family welfare policies in two distinct welfare contexts: Hungary, where certain individuals are heavily rewarded for having three or more children, and the US, where individuals do not receive significant financial support for having any number of children. Findings from this study demonstrate how policy knowledge is shaped by the public versus private nature of the welfare state. This study also reveals how policy measures can shape the gendered division of labor years before a child is born – a fruitful area for future research.KEYWORDS: Family welfarepolicy knowledgegender equitycross-nationalparenthood Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 There are a limited series of Nordic studies on men’s fertility awareness in family planning (Bodin et al., Citation2017; Schmidt et al., Citation2022), but none to date on men’s awareness of government family welfare incentives.2 Hungary does have a protected five days of paid leave that fathers can take after the birth of a child but this is not referred to as a separate paternity leave (Gábos & Makay, Citation2022, p. 274).3 The California survey also found that Latino respondents had less awareness of the state’s paid family leave law than non-Latino counterparts.4 Though I posted on social media groups targeted to New York residents, two respondents had moved to Austin, Texas and one to Chicago, Illinois at the time of the interview. As these cities are major urban centers with similar socio-political environments, I retained these interviews in the final sample. Texas and Illinois do have different family welfare policy offerings than New York. However, this study focuses on respondents’ knowledge of federal, state, and employer family supports, rather than actual policy offerings.5 The Hungarian and US samples were not limited by age, though the median age in each sample was 26 years old.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Central European University.Notes on contributorsErica MildnerErica Mildner is a PhD candidate in sociology at the University of British Columbia. She received her MA in Gender Studies from Central European University. Her research focuses on gender, labor, and family welfare policies.
人口下降的国家越来越多地转向家庭福利激励来鼓励更高的生育率。定量分析显示,这些政策是有效的,证据不一。然而,目前还不清楚个人对他们国家的家庭福利政策了解多少。特别是男性福利知识的程度仍未得到检验。通过对匈牙利(N = 11)和美国(N = 15)的26位准父母的访谈,本研究考察了两种不同福利背景下准父母对家庭福利政策的了解程度:匈牙利,某些人因为生三个或更多孩子而获得高额奖励,而美国,个人因为生任何数量的孩子而得不到显著的经济支持。这项研究的结果表明,福利国家的公共与私人性质是如何塑造政策知识的。这项研究还揭示了政策措施如何在孩子出生前几年塑造性别劳动分工——这是未来研究的一个富有成果的领域。关键词:家庭福利政策知识性别平等跨国父母披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1北欧关于计划生育中男性生育意识的研究有限(Bodin et al., Citation2017;Schmidt et al., Citation2022),但迄今为止没有关于男性对政府家庭福利激励的认识匈牙利确实有受保护的五天带薪假期,父亲可以在孩子出生后休假,但这并不被称为单独的陪产假(Gábos & Makay, Citation2022, p. 274)加州的调查还发现,拉丁裔受访者对该州带薪家庭假法律的了解程度低于非拉丁裔受访者虽然我在针对纽约居民的社交媒体群上发帖,但在采访时,两位受访者已经搬到了德克萨斯州的奥斯汀,一位搬到了伊利诺伊州的芝加哥。由于这些城市都是具有相似社会政治环境的主要城市中心,我在最后的样本中保留了这些采访。德克萨斯州和伊利诺伊州的家庭福利政策确实与纽约州不同。然而,本研究关注的是受访者对联邦、州和雇主家庭支持的了解,而不是实际的政策提供匈牙利和美国的样本不受年龄的限制,尽管每个样本的中位年龄都是26岁。本研究得到了中欧大学的支持。作者简介erica Mildner,英属哥伦比亚大学社会学博士研究生。她获得中欧大学性别研究硕士学位。她的研究重点是性别、劳动和家庭福利政策。
{"title":"What do prospective parents know about family welfare incentives? Evidence from Hungary and the United States","authors":"Erica Mildner","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2023.2268816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2268816","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTCountries facing population decline have increasingly turned to family welfare incentives to encourage higher fertility. Quantitative analyses have revealed mixed evidence that these policies are effective. However, it remains unknown how much individuals know about their countries' family welfare policies. The extent of men’s welfare knowledge in particular remains unexamined. Relying on 26 interviews with prospective parents in Hungary (N = 11) and the US (N = 15), this study examines what knowledge prospective parents have of family welfare policies in two distinct welfare contexts: Hungary, where certain individuals are heavily rewarded for having three or more children, and the US, where individuals do not receive significant financial support for having any number of children. Findings from this study demonstrate how policy knowledge is shaped by the public versus private nature of the welfare state. This study also reveals how policy measures can shape the gendered division of labor years before a child is born – a fruitful area for future research.KEYWORDS: Family welfarepolicy knowledgegender equitycross-nationalparenthood Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 There are a limited series of Nordic studies on men’s fertility awareness in family planning (Bodin et al., Citation2017; Schmidt et al., Citation2022), but none to date on men’s awareness of government family welfare incentives.2 Hungary does have a protected five days of paid leave that fathers can take after the birth of a child but this is not referred to as a separate paternity leave (Gábos & Makay, Citation2022, p. 274).3 The California survey also found that Latino respondents had less awareness of the state’s paid family leave law than non-Latino counterparts.4 Though I posted on social media groups targeted to New York residents, two respondents had moved to Austin, Texas and one to Chicago, Illinois at the time of the interview. As these cities are major urban centers with similar socio-political environments, I retained these interviews in the final sample. Texas and Illinois do have different family welfare policy offerings than New York. However, this study focuses on respondents’ knowledge of federal, state, and employer family supports, rather than actual policy offerings.5 The Hungarian and US samples were not limited by age, though the median age in each sample was 26 years old.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Central European University.Notes on contributorsErica MildnerErica Mildner is a PhD candidate in sociology at the University of British Columbia. She received her MA in Gender Studies from Central European University. Her research focuses on gender, labor, and family welfare policies.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135266026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}