首页 > 最新文献

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION最新文献

英文 中文
The centrality of education 教育的中心地位
4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad024
Philip Kitcher
Abstract This article is intended as a precis of The Main Enterprise of the World and hopes to orient those who have not read it to the symposium discussion that follows. It outlines my own version of a radical rethinking of education. Instead of holding that educational systems should be shaped so as to satisfy socio-economic constraints, interpreted narrowly in recent decades to emphasize the preparation of the young to compete in the global economy, it proposes to view education as ‘the main enterprise of the world’ (in Emerson's resonant phrase). I attempt to harmonize three important educational goals: equipping people to maintain themselves; providing the opportunity for fulfilling lives; and creating citizens who can live and work together to sustain democratic societies. The notion of fulfillment is elaborated by following J. S. Mill in emphasizing individual freedom to ‘pursue one's own good in one's own way’, and requiring the chosen project to contribute to a transhistorical pan-human enterprise. This requires a serious probing of the concept of autonomy. I argue that the reworked notion is closely linked to capacities for democratic deliberation, and, like Dewey, I view regular exchanges among citizens as crucial for genuine democracy. In light of these perspectives, shifts in the labor market, brought about by increasing automation, provide the opportunity for people to undertake rewarding (and properly respected) service work, participating throughout their lives in the education of others. The resulting position has curricular consequences, and these in turn require social and economic changes. I conclude by defending the approach I have sketched against charges of utopianism.
本文旨在作为《世界的主要事业》的简要介绍,并希望那些没有读过它的人能够在接下来的研讨会讨论中找到方向。它概述了我自己对教育的激进反思。它不认为教育系统应该被塑造以满足社会经济的限制,在最近几十年被狭隘地解释为强调年轻人在全球经济中竞争的准备,而是建议将教育视为“世界的主要事业”(用爱默生的共鸣短语)。我试图协调三个重要的教育目标:使人们有能力自我维持;提供充实人生的机会;培养能够共同生活和工作以维持民主社会的公民。在强调个人自由“以自己的方式追求自己的利益”,并要求所选择的项目为一个超越历史的泛人类事业做出贡献时,实现的概念得到了j.s.密尔的阐述。这需要对自主的概念进行认真的探索。我认为,这个重新定义的概念与民主审议的能力密切相关,而且,像杜威一样,我认为公民之间的定期交流对真正的民主至关重要。根据这些观点,自动化程度的提高所带来的劳动力市场的变化,为人们提供了从事有回报(并得到适当尊重)的服务工作的机会,并在他们的一生中参与对他人的教育。由此产生的地位会对课程产生影响,而这反过来又要求社会和经济变革。最后,我为我概述的方法辩护,反对乌托邦主义的指控。
{"title":"The centrality of education","authors":"Philip Kitcher","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad024","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article is intended as a precis of The Main Enterprise of the World and hopes to orient those who have not read it to the symposium discussion that follows. It outlines my own version of a radical rethinking of education. Instead of holding that educational systems should be shaped so as to satisfy socio-economic constraints, interpreted narrowly in recent decades to emphasize the preparation of the young to compete in the global economy, it proposes to view education as ‘the main enterprise of the world’ (in Emerson's resonant phrase). I attempt to harmonize three important educational goals: equipping people to maintain themselves; providing the opportunity for fulfilling lives; and creating citizens who can live and work together to sustain democratic societies. The notion of fulfillment is elaborated by following J. S. Mill in emphasizing individual freedom to ‘pursue one's own good in one's own way’, and requiring the chosen project to contribute to a transhistorical pan-human enterprise. This requires a serious probing of the concept of autonomy. I argue that the reworked notion is closely linked to capacities for democratic deliberation, and, like Dewey, I view regular exchanges among citizens as crucial for genuine democracy. In light of these perspectives, shifts in the labor market, brought about by increasing automation, provide the opportunity for people to undertake rewarding (and properly respected) service work, participating throughout their lives in the education of others. The resulting position has curricular consequences, and these in turn require social and economic changes. I conclude by defending the approach I have sketched against charges of utopianism.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135573960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Continuing the conversation 继续对话
4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad027
Philip Kitcher
ABSTRACT I offer some responses to the principal points raised by Ben Kotzee, Alexis Gibbs, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, and Nigel Tubbs in their commentaries on my book, The Main Enterprise of the World: Rethinking Education (MEW), and to John White's penetrating and constructive review (the four commentaries and White's review all appear in this issue). In reply to Kotzee's challenge, I argue that MEW supports an improved approach to specialized scientific education, and that worries about the future of technology are unfounded. Gibbs’ critique, I contend, assumes a one-size-fits-all approach to the arts, in an area where I am concerned to make fine differentiations. Fraser-Burgess is right to wonder how my educational program can overcome the problems of multicultural, multiracial, multiethnic societies, but I maintain that the approach to educating citizens MEW outlines is the appropriate means to address those problems. Finally, I am happy to modify my conception of the Deweyan Society by introducing the kinds of Socratic explorations Tubbs proposes. John White introduces a number of significant issues and concerns. Some of these arise, I claim, from his adoption of familiar versions of concepts MEW takes pains to explicate in new ways. Since I argue for the superiority of my explicated versions, I view the correct strategy to involve discarding the presuppositions of the traditional notions White favours. With respect to moral education, for example, White's ‘precept-centered’ conception contrasts with my emphasis on the fundamental importance of skills of mutual engagement. His most extensive discussion, on my approach to fulfilment, poses a deep challenge. Here, I attempt to clarify and motivate the concepts I deploy. With respect to his review, however, as with my exchanges with the other commentators, this response can only be the beginning of what I hope will continue to be a fruitful conversation.
本·科泽、亚历克西斯·吉布斯、谢伦·弗雷泽-伯吉斯和奈杰尔·塔布斯在对我的著作《世界的主要事业:重新思考教育》(the Main Enterprise of the World: Rethinking Education, MEW)的评论中提出的主要观点,以及约翰·怀特(John White)深刻而富有建设性的评论(这四篇评论和怀特的评论都出现在本期杂志上),我将对此做出一些回应。在回答Kotzee的挑战时,我认为新经济周刊支持一种改进的专业科学教育方法,对技术未来的担忧是没有根据的。我认为,吉布斯的批评假设了一种一刀切的艺术方法,而我所关注的是在这个领域做出细微的区分。弗雷泽-伯吉斯想知道我的教育计划如何能够克服多元文化、多种族、多民族社会的问题,这是对的,但我坚持认为,《新经济学》概述的教育公民的方法是解决这些问题的适当手段。最后,我很高兴通过介绍塔布斯提出的各种苏格拉底式探索来修改我对杜威社会的概念。John White介绍了一些重要的问题和关注点。我认为,其中一些是由于他采用了熟悉的概念版本,而MEW煞费苦心地用新的方式来解释。既然我主张我的解释版本的优越性,我认为正确的策略包括抛弃怀特所支持的传统观念的前提。例如,在道德教育方面,怀特的“以戒律为中心”的概念与我对相互参与技能的基本重要性的强调形成了对比。他最广泛的讨论是关于我实现自我的方法,这构成了一个深刻的挑战。在这里,我试图澄清和激发我所部署的概念。然而,关于他的审查,正如我与其他评论员的交流一样,这一答复只能是我希望将继续是富有成果的对话的开始。
{"title":"Continuing the conversation","authors":"Philip Kitcher","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad027","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT I offer some responses to the principal points raised by Ben Kotzee, Alexis Gibbs, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, and Nigel Tubbs in their commentaries on my book, The Main Enterprise of the World: Rethinking Education (MEW), and to John White's penetrating and constructive review (the four commentaries and White's review all appear in this issue). In reply to Kotzee's challenge, I argue that MEW supports an improved approach to specialized scientific education, and that worries about the future of technology are unfounded. Gibbs’ critique, I contend, assumes a one-size-fits-all approach to the arts, in an area where I am concerned to make fine differentiations. Fraser-Burgess is right to wonder how my educational program can overcome the problems of multicultural, multiracial, multiethnic societies, but I maintain that the approach to educating citizens MEW outlines is the appropriate means to address those problems. Finally, I am happy to modify my conception of the Deweyan Society by introducing the kinds of Socratic explorations Tubbs proposes. John White introduces a number of significant issues and concerns. Some of these arise, I claim, from his adoption of familiar versions of concepts MEW takes pains to explicate in new ways. Since I argue for the superiority of my explicated versions, I view the correct strategy to involve discarding the presuppositions of the traditional notions White favours. With respect to moral education, for example, White's ‘precept-centered’ conception contrasts with my emphasis on the fundamental importance of skills of mutual engagement. His most extensive discussion, on my approach to fulfilment, poses a deep challenge. Here, I attempt to clarify and motivate the concepts I deploy. With respect to his review, however, as with my exchanges with the other commentators, this response can only be the beginning of what I hope will continue to be a fruitful conversation.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135573961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From critical thinking to criticality and back again 从批判性思维到批判性思维,再回到批判性思维
IF 1 4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad021
H. Pettersson
This paper assesses the prospects of combining the distinctive strengths of the two major educational research programs of critical thinking and critical pedagogy—or, described more accurately, overcoming their shared limitations—in a new and superior educational objective called criticality. Several recent proposals explore the possibilities of engaging in bridgebuilding between these camps. The plan is that the distinctive strengths of these paradigms—the logical and epistemological precision of critical thinking together with the socio-political consciousness of critical pedagogy—could complement each other, while the associated adjustments to the overall picture could also help us to address their shared shortcomings. This gives us a new and more grounded educational goal of criticality, as suggested and developed independently by a growing number of thinkers (e.g. Burbules and Berk 1999; Davies 2014; Davies and Barnett 2015; Sibbett 2016; Shpeizer 2018). My article joins this on-going conversation but provides a more counter-reactionary tone by striving to vindicate the traditional mainstream conception of critical thinking. I maintain that despite their admirable ambitions, the various expressions of criticality do not succeed in combining the best parts of critical thinking and critical pedagogy, since on a deep meta-theoretical level these two paradigms have irreconcilable core principles. First, I argue that the depiction of the failures of critical thinking used to motivate criticality is to a large degree a strawman: in actuality, the existing conceptualization of critical thinking can already do the desired extra socio-political educational work, so there really is no pressing need for the suggested new augmentations. Second, the traditional worries of indoctrination, that have followed critical pedagogy since the inception of this educational movement, still remain unresolved within criticality. The only way to successfully address this concern is to lean on critical thinking as the core of our educational theory, bringing us right back to where started.
本文评估了将批判性思维和批判性教育学这两个主要教育研究项目的独特优势——或者更准确地说,克服它们的共同局限——结合在一个名为批判性的新的卓越教育目标中的前景。最近的几项提议探讨了在这些营地之间建立桥梁的可能性。计划是,这些范式的独特优势——批判性思维的逻辑和认识论准确性,以及批判性教育学的社会政治意识——可以相互补充,而对整体情况的相关调整也可以帮助我们解决它们的共同缺点。这为我们提供了一个新的、更接地气的批判性教育目标,正如越来越多的思想家所建议和独立发展的那样(例如,Burbules和Berk 1999;戴维斯2014;戴维斯和巴内特2015;西贝特2016;什佩泽2018)。我的文章加入了这场正在进行的对话,但通过努力证明传统主流批判性思维的正确性,提供了一种更为反反动的基调。我坚持认为,尽管批判性的各种表达有着令人钦佩的雄心,但它们并没有成功地将批判性思维和批判性教育学的最佳部分结合起来,因为在深层元理论层面上,这两种范式有着不可调和的核心原则。首先,我认为,对用于激励批判性思维的批判性思维失败的描述在很大程度上是一种束缚:事实上,现有的批判性思维概念化已经可以完成所需的额外社会政治教育工作,因此确实没有迫切需要提出新的补充。其次,自这场教育运动开始以来,批判教育法一直伴随着灌输的传统担忧,但在批判中仍未解决。成功解决这一问题的唯一方法是将批判性思维作为我们教育理论的核心,让我们回到起点。
{"title":"From critical thinking to criticality and back again","authors":"H. Pettersson","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad021","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper assesses the prospects of combining the distinctive strengths of the two major educational research programs of critical thinking and critical pedagogy—or, described more accurately, overcoming their shared limitations—in a new and superior educational objective called criticality. Several recent proposals explore the possibilities of engaging in bridgebuilding between these camps. The plan is that the distinctive strengths of these paradigms—the logical and epistemological precision of critical thinking together with the socio-political consciousness of critical pedagogy—could complement each other, while the associated adjustments to the overall picture could also help us to address their shared shortcomings. This gives us a new and more grounded educational goal of criticality, as suggested and developed independently by a growing number of thinkers (e.g. Burbules and Berk 1999; Davies 2014; Davies and Barnett 2015; Sibbett 2016; Shpeizer 2018). My article joins this on-going conversation but provides a more counter-reactionary tone by striving to vindicate the traditional mainstream conception of critical thinking. I maintain that despite their admirable ambitions, the various expressions of criticality do not succeed in combining the best parts of critical thinking and critical pedagogy, since on a deep meta-theoretical level these two paradigms have irreconcilable core principles. First, I argue that the depiction of the failures of critical thinking used to motivate criticality is to a large degree a strawman: in actuality, the existing conceptualization of critical thinking can already do the desired extra socio-political educational work, so there really is no pressing need for the suggested new augmentations. Second, the traditional worries of indoctrination, that have followed critical pedagogy since the inception of this educational movement, still remain unresolved within criticality. The only way to successfully address this concern is to lean on critical thinking as the core of our educational theory, bringing us right back to where started.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46232973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
‘What do we talk about when we talk about climate change?’: meaningful environmental education, beyond the info-dump “当我们谈论气候变化时,我们谈论的是什么?”:有意义的环境教育,超越信息转储
IF 1 4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad020
Cary Campbell
Learning about the causes and effects of human-induced climate-change is an essential aspect of contemporary environmental education. However, it is increasingly recognized that the familiar “information-dump delivery mode” (Morton, 2018) through which new facts about ecological destruction are being constantly communicated often contributes to anxiety, cognitive exhaustion, and can ultimately lead to hopelessness and paralysis in the face of ecological issues. In this article, I explore several pathways to approach environmental education (EE), beyond the presentation and transmission of ecological facts. I position my conceptual discussion around my own teaching experiences speaking about climate change with undergrad students across several Education classes through 2019 to 2021. I situate these reflections within the current discourse on education and teaching in/for the Anthropocene. Throughout this discussion, I locate various ways in which much EE fails to contribute to student’s agency and empowerment by consistently reducing complex ecological phenomena to a set of problems, mainly economic/technological, to be fixed by technocracy. I propose that a contemplative-existential perspective to EE is capable of responding to these reductions, most basically by providing opportunities and practices for students to process their own grief and emotions through recognizing the Anthropocene as an inescapable reality, but also a reality that cannot be determinately imagined or predicted.
了解人类引起的气候变化的原因和影响是当代环境教育的一个重要方面。然而,人们越来越认识到,通过不断传播有关生态破坏的新事实的熟悉的“信息转储传递模式”(Morton, 2018),往往会导致焦虑、认知衰竭,并最终导致面对生态问题的绝望和瘫痪。在这篇文章中,我探索了几种途径来接近环境教育(EE),超越生态事实的呈现和传播。我将我的概念性讨论定位在我自己的教学经验上,在2019年至2021年期间,我将在几个教育课程上与本科生讨论气候变化。我把这些反思放在当前关于人类世教育和教学的论述中。在整个讨论过程中,我找到了各种各样的方式,通过不断地将复杂的生态现象归结为一系列问题,主要是经济/技术问题,通过技术官僚来解决,许多情感表达未能促进学生的能力性和赋权。我认为,情感表达的沉思-存在主义视角能够应对这些减少,最基本的方法是为学生提供机会和实践,让他们通过认识到人类世是一个不可避免的现实,但也是一个无法确定地想象或预测的现实,来处理自己的悲伤和情绪。
{"title":"‘What do we talk about when we talk about climate change?’: meaningful environmental education, beyond the info-dump","authors":"Cary Campbell","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad020","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Learning about the causes and effects of human-induced climate-change is an essential aspect of contemporary environmental education. However, it is increasingly recognized that the familiar “information-dump delivery mode” (Morton, 2018) through which new facts about ecological destruction are being constantly communicated often contributes to anxiety, cognitive exhaustion, and can ultimately lead to hopelessness and paralysis in the face of ecological issues. In this article, I explore several pathways to approach environmental education (EE), beyond the presentation and transmission of ecological facts. I position my conceptual discussion around my own teaching experiences speaking about climate change with undergrad students across several Education classes through 2019 to 2021. I situate these reflections within the current discourse on education and teaching in/for the Anthropocene. Throughout this discussion, I locate various ways in which much EE fails to contribute to student’s agency and empowerment by consistently reducing complex ecological phenomena to a set of problems, mainly economic/technological, to be fixed by technocracy. I propose that a contemplative-existential perspective to EE is capable of responding to these reductions, most basically by providing opportunities and practices for students to process their own grief and emotions through recognizing the Anthropocene as an inescapable reality, but also a reality that cannot be determinately imagined or predicted.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44954207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Otherwise than Teaching by Artificial Intelligence 除了人工智能教学
IF 1 4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad019
Sang-eun Lee
Advances in digital technology are changing the methods of teaching and learning. In the course of this stream of changes, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has become a topic of great interest and concern. The development of teaching AIs (artificial intelligences that teach), which can provide adaptive and personalized dialogue with students, has shifted the relationship between teachers and students, and has raised new questions regarding the role of teachers. The purpose of this paper is to rethink the meaning of the act of teaching, without denying its variety, and to reflect on the role of teachers in the relatively unfamiliar situation created by the emergence of AI teaching machines. To this end, I attempt, first, to re-examine the nature of teaching by considering two possible orientations: teaching as a return to homogeneity and teaching as exposure to heterogeneity. My purpose is to consider the characteristics and limitations of the teaching implemented by AI and to discuss the role of human teachers in overcoming these limitations. Second, I seek to reveal what it is for the teacher to speak, which is often understood as the most important aspect of teaching, again by way of two characterizations: the closed conversation, which converges on a conclusion, and the open conversation, oriented towards ethical responsibility. In doing this, I shall examine critically some characteristics of language used by AI teaching machines and suggest alternatives that might constitute openness to an ethical conversation. In furtherance of this, I shall consider the account of teaching that is central to the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas.
数字技术的进步正在改变教与学的方法。在这种变化的过程中,人工智能(AI)的出现已经成为人们非常感兴趣和关注的话题。教学人工智能(教学人工智能)的发展,可以与学生进行适应性和个性化的对话,已经改变了教师和学生之间的关系,并提出了关于教师角色的新问题。本文的目的是在不否认教学行为多样性的前提下,重新思考教学行为的意义,并反思教师在人工智能教学机器出现所带来的相对陌生的情况下所扮演的角色。为此,我首先尝试通过考虑两种可能的方向来重新审视教学的本质:教学作为同质性的回归和教学作为异质性的暴露。我的目的是考虑人工智能教学的特点和局限性,并讨论人类教师在克服这些局限性方面的作用。其次,我试图揭示教师说话是什么,这通常被理解为教学中最重要的方面,再次通过两种特征:封闭式对话,以结论为中心,开放式对话,以道德责任为导向。在此过程中,我将批判性地研究人工智能教学机器使用的语言的一些特征,并提出可能构成对道德对话开放的替代方案。为了进一步说明这一点,我将考虑对教学的描述,这是伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯哲学的核心。
{"title":"Otherwise than Teaching by Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Sang-eun Lee","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad019","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Advances in digital technology are changing the methods of teaching and learning. In the course of this stream of changes, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has become a topic of great interest and concern. The development of teaching AIs (artificial intelligences that teach), which can provide adaptive and personalized dialogue with students, has shifted the relationship between teachers and students, and has raised new questions regarding the role of teachers. The purpose of this paper is to rethink the meaning of the act of teaching, without denying its variety, and to reflect on the role of teachers in the relatively unfamiliar situation created by the emergence of AI teaching machines. To this end, I attempt, first, to re-examine the nature of teaching by considering two possible orientations: teaching as a return to homogeneity and teaching as exposure to heterogeneity. My purpose is to consider the characteristics and limitations of the teaching implemented by AI and to discuss the role of human teachers in overcoming these limitations. Second, I seek to reveal what it is for the teacher to speak, which is often understood as the most important aspect of teaching, again by way of two characterizations: the closed conversation, which converges on a conclusion, and the open conversation, oriented towards ethical responsibility. In doing this, I shall examine critically some characteristics of language used by AI teaching machines and suggest alternatives that might constitute openness to an ethical conversation. In furtherance of this, I shall consider the account of teaching that is central to the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46302560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moral Education, Emotions, and Social Practices 道德教育、情感与社会实践
IF 1 4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad018
A. Mejía
Paul Hirst’s idea of moral education is distinctive in the central role it attributes to social practices. For him, ethical principles and virtues should not be seen as abstract entities theoretically derived and then applied in education so that students learn to reason from those principles or live by those virtues. Instead, Hirst’s moral education incorporates an initiation into social practices and comes back to them by means of situated critical reflection from within those practices themselves. Embracing Hirst’s proposed central role of social practices, this paper spells out the key role that emotions play in moral education so understood and their relations with social practices. As emotions materialize our deeply held values, incorporated into lived experience, their cultivation will not simply be a matter of deliberation, but instead of the practical exploration of social practices that can nurture and sustain them.
Paul Hirst的道德教育思想的独特之处在于它赋予社会实践的核心作用。对他来说,伦理原则和美德不应该被视为抽象的实体,从理论上推导出来,然后应用于教育,让学生学会从这些原则中推理,或者按照这些美德生活。相反,赫斯特的道德教育将启蒙融入了社会实践,并通过这些实践本身的批判性反思回到了社会实践中。本文接受赫斯特提出的社会实践的中心作用,阐明了情感在如此理解的道德教育中所起的关键作用,以及它们与社会实践的关系。当情感体现我们根深蒂固的价值观,融入生活体验时,它们的培养将不仅仅是一个深思熟虑的问题,而是对能够培养和维持它们的社会实践的实际探索。
{"title":"Moral Education, Emotions, and Social Practices","authors":"A. Mejía","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad018","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Paul Hirst’s idea of moral education is distinctive in the central role it attributes to social practices. For him, ethical principles and virtues should not be seen as abstract entities theoretically derived and then applied in education so that students learn to reason from those principles or live by those virtues. Instead, Hirst’s moral education incorporates an initiation into social practices and comes back to them by means of situated critical reflection from within those practices themselves. Embracing Hirst’s proposed central role of social practices, this paper spells out the key role that emotions play in moral education so understood and their relations with social practices. As emotions materialize our deeply held values, incorporated into lived experience, their cultivation will not simply be a matter of deliberation, but instead of the practical exploration of social practices that can nurture and sustain them.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47588390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the potential in film for ethics education: In defence of educational ethicism 论电影伦理教育的潜力:为教育伦理辩护
IF 1 4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad017
J. MacAllister
In this paper the potential in film for ethics education is considered and the theory of educational ethicism is defended. Some key features of ethicism are firstly outlined. Gaut’s argument about how artworks may teach ethics in an aesthetically meritorious way is also discussed. Two objections (from Kieran and Sauchelli) to Gaut’s position are secondly considered. It is argued that Gaut’s ethicism is not well placed to surmount these objections. However, I thirdly draw upon Hirst to explain why a refined species of ethicism (educational ethicism) can surmount these objections. Educational ethicism holds that artworks with ethical themes be regarded as starting points for conversations about ethics rather than conveyers of definite ethical teachings that only a normatively specified audience can grasp. Three ways that film can possess potential for ethics education are also documented: through the moral growth of the audience or by helping them to deepen understanding of an aspect of ethical experience or theory.
本文对电影伦理教育的潜力进行了思考,并对教育伦理理论进行了辩护。首先概述了伦理学的一些关键特征。高特关于艺术作品如何以美学上值得赞扬的方式教导伦理的论点也被讨论。其次考虑对高特立场的两个反对意见(来自基兰和索切利)。有人认为,高特的伦理学并不能很好地克服这些反对意见。然而,第三,我借用赫斯特来解释为什么一种精致的伦理主义(教育伦理主义)可以克服这些反对意见。教育伦理学认为,具有伦理主题的艺术作品应被视为伦理对话的起点,而不是只有规范指定的受众才能掌握的明确伦理教义的载体。影片具有伦理教育潜力的三种方式也被记录下来:通过观众的道德成长或通过帮助他们加深对伦理经验或理论的一个方面的理解。
{"title":"On the potential in film for ethics education: In defence of educational ethicism","authors":"J. MacAllister","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad017","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In this paper the potential in film for ethics education is considered and the theory of educational ethicism is defended. Some key features of ethicism are firstly outlined. Gaut’s argument about how artworks may teach ethics in an aesthetically meritorious way is also discussed. Two objections (from Kieran and Sauchelli) to Gaut’s position are secondly considered. It is argued that Gaut’s ethicism is not well placed to surmount these objections. However, I thirdly draw upon Hirst to explain why a refined species of ethicism (educational ethicism) can surmount these objections. Educational ethicism holds that artworks with ethical themes be regarded as starting points for conversations about ethics rather than conveyers of definite ethical teachings that only a normatively specified audience can grasp. Three ways that film can possess potential for ethics education are also documented: through the moral growth of the audience or by helping them to deepen understanding of an aspect of ethical experience or theory.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44353021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Paul Hirst and religious education’s curriculum question; or, how Hirst never thought religion was a form of knowledge at all 保罗·赫斯特与宗教教育的课程问题或者,赫斯特从来没有认为宗教是一种知识形式
IF 1 4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad014
D. Aldridge
Hirst consistently listed religion as a form of knowledge. He had numerous chances to revise this position, but did not. However, whenever Hirst actually considered religion and the curriculum in specific detail, either he did so without reference to the curriculum principles of liberal education, or he implicitly or explicitly rejected his own claim that religion was a form of knowledge. In this article I hope to contribute to an appreciation of Hirst’s work by showing how attempting to understand his thinking on religious education against the background of forms of knowledge both adds to confusion about what Hirst intended the forms of knowledge to be, and hinders an understanding of what his explicitly stated curriculum position on religion actually was. I speculate that Hirst included religion as a form of knowledge only as an ‘agnostic placeholder’ acknowledging the possibility that religion might turn out to be a form of knowledge. I then offer a brief assessment of this revised interpretation of Hirst’s position from the perspective of contemporary scholarship in the philosophy of religious education.
赫斯特一贯将宗教列为一种知识形式。他曾多次有机会修改这一立场,但都没有。然而,每当赫斯特真正详细地考虑宗教和课程时,要么他这样做没有参考自由教育的课程原则,要么他含蓄或明确地拒绝了他自己关于宗教是一种知识形式的主张。在这篇文章中,我希望通过展示试图在知识形式的背景下理解赫斯特对宗教教育的思考,既增加了对赫斯特想要的知识形式的困惑,又阻碍了对他明确阐述的宗教课程立场的理解,从而有助于对赫斯特的工作做出评价。我推测赫斯特将宗教作为一种知识形式,只是作为一个“不可知论占位符”,承认宗教可能成为一种知识的形式。然后,我从宗教教育哲学的当代学术角度,对赫斯特立场的修订解释进行了简要的评估。
{"title":"Paul Hirst and religious education’s curriculum question; or, how Hirst never thought religion was a form of knowledge at all","authors":"D. Aldridge","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad014","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Hirst consistently listed religion as a form of knowledge. He had numerous chances to revise this position, but did not. However, whenever Hirst actually considered religion and the curriculum in specific detail, either he did so without reference to the curriculum principles of liberal education, or he implicitly or explicitly rejected his own claim that religion was a form of knowledge. In this article I hope to contribute to an appreciation of Hirst’s work by showing how attempting to understand his thinking on religious education against the background of forms of knowledge both adds to confusion about what Hirst intended the forms of knowledge to be, and hinders an understanding of what his explicitly stated curriculum position on religion actually was. I speculate that Hirst included religion as a form of knowledge only as an ‘agnostic placeholder’ acknowledging the possibility that religion might turn out to be a form of knowledge. I then offer a brief assessment of this revised interpretation of Hirst’s position from the perspective of contemporary scholarship in the philosophy of religious education.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45421082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Aims of Upbringing, Reasonable Affect, and Parental Rights: A Response to Paul Hirst’s Autobiographical Reflections 教养的目的、合理的情感与父母的权利:对保罗·赫斯特自传体反思的回应
IF 1 4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad016
John Tillson
In a candid autobiographical chapter (Hirst 2010), which numbers among his last writings, Paul Hirst subjects his upbringing within a fundamentalist Christian sect to searching moral appraisal. He concludes that his parents wronged him by religiously indoctrinating him, stifling his emotional development, and arbitrarily restricting his range of valuable morally permissible experiences. This upbringing undermined his autonomy and—more fundamentally, on his account—kept him from living the life he had most reason to live. Surprisingly, however, Hirst suggests that his parents had a right to initiate him into this conservative religious life, though the wider community owed him a more non-directive form of religious education to temper it. This is a striking concession to the scope of parental rights, especially in view of Hirst’s complaint that the emotional repression required by his parents was to ‘distort [his] experience and understanding of [himself] and others in ways that persisted well into [his] adult life’. Engaging with Hirst's evaluation of his upbringing, I argue for a narrower range of parental rights than Hirst–one which excludes a parental moral right to religious initiation–and provide an account of the kind of emotional experiences to which children plausibly have a right.
在一个坦率的自传体章节(赫斯特2010)中,这是他最后的作品之一,保罗·赫斯特将他在基督教原教旨主义教派中的成长历程与寻找道德评价联系起来。他的结论是,他的父母对他进行了宗教灌输,扼杀了他的情感发展,并武断地限制了他有价值的道德允许经历的范围,这是对他的冤枉。这种成长环境削弱了他的自主性,更根本的是,从他的角度来看,这使他无法过上他最有理由过的生活。然而,令人惊讶的是,赫斯特认为他的父母有权利引导他进入这种保守的宗教生活,尽管更广泛的社区欠他一种更非指令性的宗教教育形式来缓和它。这是对父母权利范围的惊人让步,尤其是考虑到赫斯特的抱怨,他的父母要求的情感压抑是“扭曲[他]的经历和对[他]自己和他人的理解,这种方式一直持续到[他]成年生活”。通过研究赫斯特对自己成长经历的评价,我认为父母权利的范围要比赫斯特窄一些——这种权利排除了父母参加宗教启蒙仪式的道德权利——并提供了一种孩子似乎有权获得的情感体验的解释。
{"title":"The Aims of Upbringing, Reasonable Affect, and Parental Rights: A Response to Paul Hirst’s Autobiographical Reflections","authors":"John Tillson","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In a candid autobiographical chapter (Hirst 2010), which numbers among his last writings, Paul Hirst subjects his upbringing within a fundamentalist Christian sect to searching moral appraisal. He concludes that his parents wronged him by religiously indoctrinating him, stifling his emotional development, and arbitrarily restricting his range of valuable morally permissible experiences. This upbringing undermined his autonomy and—more fundamentally, on his account—kept him from living the life he had most reason to live. Surprisingly, however, Hirst suggests that his parents had a right to initiate him into this conservative religious life, though the wider community owed him a more non-directive form of religious education to temper it. This is a striking concession to the scope of parental rights, especially in view of Hirst’s complaint that the emotional repression required by his parents was to ‘distort [his] experience and understanding of [himself] and others in ways that persisted well into [his] adult life’. Engaging with Hirst's evaluation of his upbringing, I argue for a narrower range of parental rights than Hirst–one which excludes a parental moral right to religious initiation–and provide an account of the kind of emotional experiences to which children plausibly have a right.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43374344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Pursuing rational public defence’: Paul Hirst on teacher education “追求理性的公共辩护”:保罗·赫斯特谈教师教育
IF 1 4区 教育学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad013
J. Orchard
The question of the role of theory in initial teacher education was one that interested Paul Hirst throughout his long and distinguished academic career. When the story of teacher education in England is told by philosophers of education and, crucially, by teacher educators, we are reminded of Hirst’s contribution in two significant respects, as someone who both taught teachers and commented on the aim, purpose, and structure of teacher education. First, in the wake of the Robbins report, Hirst supported Peters in helping to establish education at London’s Institute of Education (IOE) as an academic subject which promoted theory, particularly philosophy, suited to the needs of pre-service teachers. Secondly, several decades later, Hirst provided invaluable comment on the influential Oxford Internship programme. This provision re-imagined the one-year professional programmes for postgraduates entering teaching as a partnership between schools and universities. Hirst’s commentary, while generous and supportive, argued that teachers needed greater attention paid to the pursuit of ‘rational public defence’ during their pre-service formation than was evident in the ‘practical theorising’ approach that underpins internship. Having examined Hirst’s contribution to and commentary on teacher education as a philosopher of education, I will argue that his example continues to offer insight today. In these neo-liberal times, there are ad hoc opportunities for philosophy of education to continue to be included meaningfully in teachers’ professional formation, although the extent and reach it can exercise are limited where the dominant discourse describes teachers as being ‘trained’ rather than educated. I offer examples of theory developing in practice, building on established ideas of what is appropriate.
在保罗·赫斯特漫长而杰出的学术生涯中,理论在初级教师教育中的作用问题一直是他感兴趣的问题。当教育哲学家,尤其是教师教育者讲述英国教师教育的故事时,我们想起了赫斯特在两个重要方面的贡献,他既教导教师,又对教师教育的目标、目的和结构发表了评论。首先,在罗宾斯报告之后,赫斯特支持彼得斯帮助伦敦教育学院(IOE)建立教育作为一门学术学科,以促进理论,特别是哲学,以适应职前教师的需要。其次,几十年后,赫斯特为颇具影响力的牛津实习项目提供了宝贵的意见。这项规定重新设想了为研究生进入教学领域提供的为期一年的专业课程是学校和大学之间的合作伙伴关系。赫斯特的评论,虽然慷慨和支持,认为教师需要更多的关注追求“理性的公共辩护”在他们的职前培训,而不是明显的“实践理论化”的方法,支持实习。作为一名教育哲学家,我考察了赫斯特对教师教育的贡献和评论,我认为他的榜样在今天继续提供洞察力。在这些新自由主义时代,教育哲学有特别的机会继续被有意义地包括在教师的专业形成中,尽管它可以行使的范围和范围是有限的,因为主导话语将教师描述为“训练”而不是“教育”。我提供了一些在实践中发展理论的例子,这些理论是建立在关于什么是合适的既定观念之上的。
{"title":"‘Pursuing rational public defence’: Paul Hirst on teacher education","authors":"J. Orchard","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The question of the role of theory in initial teacher education was one that interested Paul Hirst throughout his long and distinguished academic career. When the story of teacher education in England is told by philosophers of education and, crucially, by teacher educators, we are reminded of Hirst’s contribution in two significant respects, as someone who both taught teachers and commented on the aim, purpose, and structure of teacher education. First, in the wake of the Robbins report, Hirst supported Peters in helping to establish education at London’s Institute of Education (IOE) as an academic subject which promoted theory, particularly philosophy, suited to the needs of pre-service teachers. Secondly, several decades later, Hirst provided invaluable comment on the influential Oxford Internship programme. This provision re-imagined the one-year professional programmes for postgraduates entering teaching as a partnership between schools and universities. Hirst’s commentary, while generous and supportive, argued that teachers needed greater attention paid to the pursuit of ‘rational public defence’ during their pre-service formation than was evident in the ‘practical theorising’ approach that underpins internship. Having examined Hirst’s contribution to and commentary on teacher education as a philosopher of education, I will argue that his example continues to offer insight today. In these neo-liberal times, there are ad hoc opportunities for philosophy of education to continue to be included meaningfully in teachers’ professional formation, although the extent and reach it can exercise are limited where the dominant discourse describes teachers as being ‘trained’ rather than educated. I offer examples of theory developing in practice, building on established ideas of what is appropriate.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43846943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1