Pub Date : 2024-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09541-5
Abstract
Flashcard interventions are commonly used to increase sight-word acquisition and reading ability among students. However, most research on flashcard interventions is implemented in person and not using virtual instruction. The current study compared two flash card interventions, incremental rehearsal (IR) and strategic incremental rehearsal (SIR), on sight-word acquisition when administered via Zoom® video sharing technology. Participants included four struggling readers in first grade. An adapted alternating treatments single-case design exposed participants to the IR, SIR, and a control condition for 10 sessions with the interventionist providing all sessions via Zoom®. Findings indicated all participants learned more words with IR and SIR than in the control condition. However, SIR resulted in more gains in sight-word acquisition compared to IR for all participants. Implications for implementing individualized interventions via virtual modalities are discussed.
摘要 闪存卡干预通常用于提高学生的视字能力和阅读能力。然而,有关闪卡干预的大多数研究都是在课堂上实施的,而不是使用虚拟教学。本研究比较了通过 Zoom® 视频共享技术实施的两种闪卡干预--增量排练(IR)和策略性增量排练(SIR)--对视词习得的影响。参与者包括四名一年级的阅读困难生。干预者通过 Zoom® 提供所有课程,采用改编的交替处理单例设计,让参与者接受 IR、SIR 和对照条件的 10 次训练。研究结果表明,与对照组相比,所有参加者在 IR 和 SIR 中都学到了更多的单词。然而,与 IR 相比,SIR 使所有参与者在视力单词学习方面取得了更大的进步。本文讨论了通过虚拟模式实施个性化干预的意义。
{"title":"Comparing the Efficacy of Virtual Implementation for Two Sight Word Flashcard Interventions","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09541-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09541-5","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Flashcard interventions are commonly used to increase sight-word acquisition and reading ability among students. However, most research on flashcard interventions is implemented in person and not using virtual instruction. The current study compared two flash card interventions, incremental rehearsal (IR) and strategic incremental rehearsal (SIR), on sight-word acquisition when administered via Zoom® video sharing technology. Participants included four struggling readers in first grade. An adapted alternating treatments single-case design exposed participants to the IR, SIR, and a control condition for 10 sessions with the interventionist providing all sessions via Zoom®. Findings indicated all participants learned more words with IR and SIR than in the control condition. However, SIR resulted in more gains in sight-word acquisition compared to IR for all participants. Implications for implementing individualized interventions via virtual modalities are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"79 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139408582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-05DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09539-z
Abstract
Pyramidal training is an effective model for disseminating behavior analytic skills. However, pyramidal training in research is often conducted in controlled university settings. Further, research that has evaluated the effectiveness of pyramidal training in classroom settings (see Pence et al. 2014) often focuses on improving the use of one procedure (e.g., functional analysis) over a brief period. We conducted this study to evaluate the generalized effectiveness of behavioral skills training within a pyramidal model to improve teacher training skills across five procedures in the classroom setting over a nine-month period. We used behavioral skills training (BST) to train teachers (Tier 1) to implement BST to train teaching assistants (Tier 2) to implement Applied Behavior Analytic (ABA) procedures stimulus-stimulus pairing, multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference assessment, mand training, discrete trial teaching (DTT), and graphing data. Pyramidal training was effective in increasing teachers’ procedural integrity of BST, and the social validity of the model was apparent in that teacher assistants’ procedural integrity of target ABA procedures increased after Tier 2 training. Teachers required periodic feedback to maintain training skills, train novel procedures, and novel staff. Thus, pyramidal BST was effective to teach new skills, but required ongoing monitoring and feedback to ensure maintenance and generality of training skills.
{"title":"Effectiveness of Pyramidal Training on Staff Acquisition of Five Behavior Analytic Procedures in the School","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09539-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09539-z","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Pyramidal training is an effective model for disseminating behavior analytic skills. However, pyramidal training in research is often conducted in controlled university settings. Further, research that has evaluated the effectiveness of pyramidal training in classroom settings (see Pence et al. 2014) often focuses on improving the use of one procedure (e.g., functional analysis) over a brief period. We conducted this study to evaluate the generalized effectiveness of behavioral skills training within a pyramidal model to improve teacher training skills across five procedures in the classroom setting over a nine-month period. We used behavioral skills training (BST) to train teachers (Tier 1) to implement BST to train teaching assistants (Tier 2) to implement Applied Behavior Analytic (ABA) procedures stimulus-stimulus pairing, multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference assessment, mand training, discrete trial teaching (DTT), and graphing data. Pyramidal training was effective in increasing teachers’ procedural integrity of BST, and the social validity of the model was apparent in that teacher assistants’ procedural integrity of target ABA procedures increased after Tier 2 training. Teachers required periodic feedback to maintain training skills, train novel procedures, and novel staff. Thus, pyramidal BST was effective to teach new skills, but required ongoing monitoring and feedback to ensure maintenance and generality of training skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139375393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-02DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09540-6
Patrick W. Romani, Angelique M. Koerner
The behavior-analytic approach to the assessment and treatment of problem behavior begins with a functional behavior assessment and concludes with function-based treatment implementation. Extinction bursts and the resurgence of problem behavior represent common barriers to successfully implementing these treatments. Recent research documents a common prevalence of these phenomena following contingency changes, including when transitioning from assessment to treatment. Researchers mitigate the disruptive impact of extinction bursts by controlling for the duration of exposure to the establishing operation (EO). Indeed, controlling for EO exposure when initiating treatment decreases the occurrence of problem behavior. While this effect has been documented, it is not clear if certain schedules of reinforcement are more appropriate for initial treatment arrangements than others. The purpose of the current study was to compare fixed-ratio (FR) and fixed-interval (FI) schedules of reinforcement implementation after controlling for the duration of EO exposure for participants who engaged in negatively reinforced problem behavior. Results generally showed both FR and FI treatment arrangements produced reductions in problem behavior and improvements in task completion. Despite these reductions, problem behavior seemed more likely to occur during the FI treatment arrangement. We will discuss these data in terms of identifying effective initial behavioral treatment arrangements for individuals engaging in escape-reinforced problem behavior.
评估和治疗问题行为的行为分析方法始于功能行为评估,终于基于功能的治疗实施。消退爆发和问题行为复发是成功实施这些治疗的常见障碍。最近的研究表明,在改变应急措施后,包括从评估过渡到治疗时,这些现象普遍存在。研究人员通过控制建立操作(EO)的持续时间来减轻灭绝爆发的破坏性影响。事实上,在开始治疗时控制 EO 的暴露时间可以减少问题行为的发生。虽然这种效果已被记录在案,但还不清楚某些强化计划是否比其他计划更适合初始治疗安排。本研究的目的是比较固定比率(FR)和固定间隔(FI)强化计划的实施情况,在此之前先要控制参与负强化问题行为的参与者接触环氧乙烷的时间。结果表明,FR 和 FI 治疗安排都能减少问题行为,提高任务完成率。尽管问题行为有所减少,但问题行为似乎更有可能发生在 FI 治疗安排中。我们将讨论这些数据,以便为有逃避强化问题行为的人确定有效的初始行为治疗安排。
{"title":"Comparison of Fixed-Ratio and Fixed-Interval Schedules of Reinforcement within the Treatment of Escape-Reinforced Problem Behavior","authors":"Patrick W. Romani, Angelique M. Koerner","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09540-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09540-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The behavior-analytic approach to the assessment and treatment of problem behavior begins with a functional behavior assessment and concludes with function-based treatment implementation. Extinction bursts and the resurgence of problem behavior represent common barriers to successfully implementing these treatments. Recent research documents a common prevalence of these phenomena following contingency changes, including when transitioning from assessment to treatment. Researchers mitigate the disruptive impact of extinction bursts by controlling for the duration of exposure to the establishing operation (EO). Indeed, controlling for EO exposure when initiating treatment decreases the occurrence of problem behavior. While this effect has been documented, it is not clear if certain schedules of reinforcement are more appropriate for initial treatment arrangements than others. The purpose of the current study was to compare fixed-ratio (FR) and fixed-interval (FI) schedules of reinforcement implementation after controlling for the duration of EO exposure for participants who engaged in negatively reinforced problem behavior. Results generally showed both FR and FI treatment arrangements produced reductions in problem behavior and improvements in task completion. Despite these reductions, problem behavior seemed more likely to occur during the FI treatment arrangement. We will discuss these data in terms of identifying effective initial behavioral treatment arrangements for individuals engaging in escape-reinforced problem behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139079587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-29DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09537-1
Margaret T. Floress, Megan D. Evans, Sarah J. Conoyer, Kealie Jenkins
When early childhood educators are not adequately trained in evidence-based behavior management strategies or do not have access to consultation supports, preschool students are at an increased risk of school failure and expulsion. Research suggests that supporting in-service teachers with praise training increases their use of praise and positively impacts student behavior. However, it is unclear to what extent preservice early childhood teachers use praise, in the absence of training. This study examined 13, preservice, early educators’ natural use and acceptability of praise. Praise and reprimand rates were collected during preservice educators’ field-based practicum via direct observation. In addition, the Behavior Intervention Rating Scale for Praise (BIRS-P) was used to measure preservice educators’ praise acceptability. On average, preservice educators reported high acceptability of praise; however, they used praise infrequently, compared to preschool, in-service teachers. Preservice educators used praise infrequently, suggesting they need direct training and support to use this evidence-based strategy. Implications and future research directions are offered.
{"title":"Exploring Pre-service, Early Childhood Educators’ Use of Praise: A Preliminary Investigation","authors":"Margaret T. Floress, Megan D. Evans, Sarah J. Conoyer, Kealie Jenkins","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09537-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09537-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>When early childhood educators are not adequately trained in evidence-based behavior management strategies or do not have access to consultation supports, preschool students are at an increased risk of school failure and expulsion. Research suggests that supporting in-service teachers with praise training increases their use of praise and positively impacts student behavior. However, it is unclear to what extent preservice early childhood teachers use praise, in the absence of training. This study examined 13, preservice, early educators’ natural use and acceptability of praise. Praise and reprimand rates were collected during preservice educators’ field-based practicum via direct observation. In addition, the Behavior Intervention Rating Scale for Praise (BIRS-P) was used to measure preservice educators’ praise acceptability. On average, preservice educators reported high acceptability of praise; however, they used praise infrequently, compared to preschool, in-service teachers. Preservice educators used praise infrequently, suggesting they need direct training and support to use this evidence-based strategy. Implications and future research directions are offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"698 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138528818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-24DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09536-2
Matthew K. Burns
Previous research used the learning hierarchy (LH) as a heuristic to select reading interventions based on the level of accuracy defined as the percentage of words read correctly. The current study examined the validity of the LH by reporting the prevalence of reading profiles proposed by the framework: Acquisition phase—inaccurate and slow, Proficiency phase—accurate and slow, and Generalization phase—accurate and fast to determine the extent to which the data could be used to drive reading interventions. The design also included a hypothetical phase of inaccurate and fast, which was not included in the LH. Reading fluency data from 223 second- and third-grade students were compared to accuracy (93%) and rate (national grade-level norms) criteria. When data were classified into the LH phases described above, 44.4% (n = 99) of the students were in the Acquisition phase, 23.8% (n = 53) were in the Proficiency phase, and 31.4% (n = 70) were in the Generalization phase. Less than 1% (n = 1) was in the hypothetical phase of inaccurate and fast, and the rarity of this occurrence was predicted by the LH. These data support the LH as a conceptual framework to drive diagnostic assessment, and the importance of examining accuracy data when designing reading fluency interventions.
{"title":"Examining the Learning Hierarchy with Accuracy and Rate Scores for Reading Fluency Among Second- and Third-Grade Students","authors":"Matthew K. Burns","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09536-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09536-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research used the learning hierarchy (LH) as a heuristic to select reading interventions based on the level of accuracy defined as the percentage of words read correctly. The current study examined the validity of the LH by reporting the prevalence of reading profiles proposed by the framework: Acquisition phase—inaccurate and slow, Proficiency phase—accurate and slow, and Generalization phase—accurate and fast to determine the extent to which the data could be used to drive reading interventions. The design also included a hypothetical phase of inaccurate and fast, which was not included in the LH. Reading fluency data from 223 second- and third-grade students were compared to accuracy (93%) and rate (national grade-level norms) criteria. When data were classified into the LH phases described above, 44.4% (<i>n</i> = 99) of the students were in the Acquisition phase, 23.8% (<i>n</i> = 53) were in the Proficiency phase, and 31.4% (<i>n</i> = 70) were in the Generalization phase. Less than 1% (<i>n</i> = 1) was in the hypothetical phase of inaccurate and fast, and the rarity of this occurrence was predicted by the LH. These data support the LH as a conceptual framework to drive diagnostic assessment, and the importance of examining accuracy data when designing reading fluency interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138528815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-18DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09531-7
Han Jiang, Wilma Vialle, Stuart Woodcock
{"title":"Redesigning Check-In/Check-Out to Improve On-Task Behavior in a Chinese Classroom","authors":"Han Jiang, Wilma Vialle, Stuart Woodcock","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09531-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09531-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"124 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139261160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-18DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09533-5
Chelsea S. Wilson, Christopher H. Skinner, Chelsea Price, Brian Wilhoit, Mary-Beth Coleman
The effects of a computer-based reading intervention on whole word reading in three post-secondary students with intellectual and/or developmental disability were evaluated using a multiple baseline across tasks (i.e., word sets) design. Words were selected from each student’s elective undergraduate social science course materials. During this stimulus–response–stimulus–response intervention, the computer presented target words embedded within short phrases and the student had 3 s to read the phrase before a recording of the phrase was played. The student then repeated the phrase, and the computer screen provided a new word phrase and the next trial began. During assessment, students read target words in isolation. These words had to be read correctly within 3 s across two consecutive assessments to be considered acquired. Visual analysis of the repeated measures graphs suggests nine demonstrations of a treatment effect and provides evidence of experimental control across all three students. The current results showed that learning to read content-specific words when they were embedded in phrases resulted in generalization (i.e., allowed students to read the words in isolation). Discussion focuses on implications, limitations, and future research.
{"title":"The Effects of a Computer-Based Phrase Reading Intervention on Isolated Word Reading in Post-secondary Students with Disabilities","authors":"Chelsea S. Wilson, Christopher H. Skinner, Chelsea Price, Brian Wilhoit, Mary-Beth Coleman","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09533-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09533-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The effects of a computer-based reading intervention on whole word reading in three post-secondary students with intellectual and/or developmental disability were evaluated using a multiple baseline across tasks (i.e., word sets) design. Words were selected from each student’s elective undergraduate social science course materials. During this stimulus–response–stimulus–response intervention, the computer presented target words embedded within short phrases and the student had 3 s to read the phrase before a recording of the phrase was played. The student then repeated the phrase, and the computer screen provided a new word phrase and the next trial began. During assessment, students read target words in isolation. These words had to be read correctly within 3 s across two consecutive assessments to be considered acquired. Visual analysis of the repeated measures graphs suggests nine demonstrations of a treatment effect and provides evidence of experimental control across all three students. The current results showed that learning to read content-specific words when they were embedded in phrases resulted in generalization (i.e., allowed students to read the words in isolation). Discussion focuses on implications, limitations, and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138528817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-16DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09538-0
Emily J. Warburton, Paul Caldarella, Howard P. Wills, Rebecca Winters
English language learners (ELL) and Hispanic students are at an increased risk for academic difficulty. Effective classroom management strategies may help these students, but teachers often report lack of training in such strategies. Class-wide Function-related Intervention Teams in Middle School (CW-FIT MS) is a research-based intervention that has helped teachers increase students’ on-task behavior using group contingencies, rewards, and praise. We investigated the efficacy of CW-FIT MS in classes with high proportions of Hispanic and ELL students using an ABAB single-subject withdrawal design with maintenance probes. One middle school English teacher and two of her classes (language arts and language development) participated. The teacher implemented the intervention with adequate fidelity in both classes. Students were significantly more on task during CW-FIT MS. Teachers and students found the intervention to be socially valid. Some students specifically noted that CW-FIT MS was helpful because it taught respect, which was a response unique to Hispanic students. CW-FIT MS appears to be an appropriate classroom management strategy for classes with ELL and Hispanic students and merits further research into the cultural relevance of the intervention.
{"title":"Improving Behavior in Middle School Classes with Hispanic and English Language Learners: A Study of Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams","authors":"Emily J. Warburton, Paul Caldarella, Howard P. Wills, Rebecca Winters","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09538-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09538-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>English language learners (ELL) and Hispanic students are at an increased risk for academic difficulty. Effective classroom management strategies may help these students, but teachers often report lack of training in such strategies. Class-wide Function-related Intervention Teams in Middle School (CW-FIT MS) is a research-based intervention that has helped teachers increase students’ on-task behavior using group contingencies, rewards, and praise. We investigated the efficacy of CW-FIT MS in classes with high proportions of Hispanic and ELL students using an ABAB single-subject withdrawal design with maintenance probes. One middle school English teacher and two of her classes (language arts and language development) participated. The teacher implemented the intervention with adequate fidelity in both classes. Students were significantly more on task during CW-FIT MS. Teachers and students found the intervention to be socially valid. Some students specifically noted that CW-FIT MS was helpful because it taught respect, which was a response unique to Hispanic students. CW-FIT MS appears to be an appropriate classroom management strategy for classes with ELL and Hispanic students and merits further research into the cultural relevance of the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138528816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09534-4
Robert H. LaRue, Christopher J. Manente, Lauren Pepa, Erica Dashow, James C. Maraventano, Kimberly N. Sloman, Kate E. Fiske, Lara Delmolino, Jenna Budge
As educators who provide support to individuals with ASD, our primary goal should be to teach the skills necessary to live as independently as possible. As critically important as these skills are, teaching independent living skills can sometimes be challenging when motivation is low. These issues become even more complicated as individuals get older, and practical and ethical issues may preclude the use of physical prompting. The purpose of the current investigation was to use economic manipulations to encourage three adolescents and adults with ASD and intellectual disabilities to complete nonpreferred activities without using physical prompting and/or escape extinction. Specifically, we adapted the basic concepts of behavioral economics (altering the “pay rate” for certain tasks and the “cost” of certain reinforcers) to influence choices made when offered several work tasks and rewards. With the implementation of economic manipulations, the three participants started to voluntarily complete nonpreferred tasks in the absence of staff prompting. In addition, one of the participants selected alternative rewards following the manipulations. The results are important as they represent a way to incorporate choice into programming while limiting the need for intrusive prompting.
{"title":"The Use of Economic Manipulations to Influence Choice in Adolescents and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders","authors":"Robert H. LaRue, Christopher J. Manente, Lauren Pepa, Erica Dashow, James C. Maraventano, Kimberly N. Sloman, Kate E. Fiske, Lara Delmolino, Jenna Budge","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09534-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09534-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As educators who provide support to individuals with ASD, our primary goal should be to teach the skills necessary to live as independently as possible. As critically important as these skills are, teaching independent living skills can sometimes be challenging when motivation is low. These issues become even more complicated as individuals get older, and practical and ethical issues may preclude the use of physical prompting. The purpose of the current investigation was to use economic manipulations to encourage three adolescents and adults with ASD and intellectual disabilities to complete nonpreferred activities without using physical prompting and/or escape extinction. Specifically, we adapted the basic concepts of behavioral economics (altering the “pay rate” for certain tasks and the “cost” of certain reinforcers) to influence choices made when offered several work tasks and rewards. With the implementation of economic manipulations, the three participants started to voluntarily complete nonpreferred tasks in the absence of staff prompting. In addition, one of the participants selected alternative rewards following the manipulations. The results are important as they represent a way to incorporate choice into programming while limiting the need for intrusive prompting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138528820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-11DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09535-3
Marie Kirkpatrick, K. Nicole O’Guinn, Roberta Carrillo Vega, Jessica S. Akers, Tonya N. Davis, Suzannah K. Avery
{"title":"Systematic Review of Video Activity Schedules to Teach Autistic People","authors":"Marie Kirkpatrick, K. Nicole O’Guinn, Roberta Carrillo Vega, Jessica S. Akers, Tonya N. Davis, Suzannah K. Avery","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09535-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09535-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"47 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135042794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}