ABSTRACTSchool bullying and cyberbullying are serious public health problems that negatively affect the lives of school-aged children. We examined the correlation between risk behaviors and lack of resiliency factors with bullying and cyberbullying across seven Mediterranean countries. The sample consisted of 33,399 adolescents (51.1% girls) aged 11, 13, and 15 years who participated in the Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey in 2018 in Greece, Israel, Italy, Macedonia, Malta, Portugal, and Spain. Bivariate logistic regressions were conducted to test the relationship between risk behaviors, resilience, and bullying. All risk behaviors and lack of resiliency factors examined were related to involvement in bullying as a victim, perpetrator, or bully-victim, both in school and cyberbullying. Moreover, the odds of involvement in school bullying and cyberbullying increased as the number of risk behaviors and the lack of resiliency factors grew. Our results may contribute to the development and implementation of anti-bullying programs.KEYWORDS: Bullyingcyberbullyingrisk behaviorsresiliency factors Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Institutional review board statementThe study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of HBSC and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Bar Ilan University (code RO-10203) (05//2018).Informed consent statementInformed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the studyAdditional informationFundingThis research was funded by grants from them ministries of health, education, and public security. The Israel HBSC research team is supported by the Department of Health. Funding number: 430/21.Notes on contributorsRotem MaorRotem Maor has a Ph.D. in Education, is a Lecturer at David Yellin College of Education in Israel. Her main research interests include: social rejection, bullying and cyberbullying.Tesler RikiDr. Tesler Riki is currently a lecturer in the Department of Health Systems Management at Ariel University in Ariel, Israel. She lectures on the topics of health education and promotion, epidemiology, the sociology of health, and risk and health behaviors among teenagers and adults, with a particular emphasis on intervention programs. She is a researcher connected to the international Health Behavior in School-Aged Children (HBSC) program, which focuses on the health and welfare of children and youth.Giladi ArielaGiladi Ariela received her Ph.D. in education from Ariel University, Israel, where she presently lectures. She is a postdoctoral researcher at the HBSC-Israel, an international research program on adolescent well-being and health, at Bar Ilan University Faculty of Education. Her focus of research includes higher education, foreign language learning, self-efficacy, effort, wellbeing, adolescents, risk behaviors, and emotional health.Ben-Meir LilachLilach Ben-Meir received her Ph.D. in psychology from Ariel Un
{"title":"Risk and Resiliency Factors Associated with School Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Adolescents in Mediterranean Countries","authors":"Rotem Maor, Tesler Riki, Giladi Ariela, Ben-Meir Lilach, Jerassi Meital, Adilson Marques, Harel-Fisch Yossi","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2266811","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2266811","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSchool bullying and cyberbullying are serious public health problems that negatively affect the lives of school-aged children. We examined the correlation between risk behaviors and lack of resiliency factors with bullying and cyberbullying across seven Mediterranean countries. The sample consisted of 33,399 adolescents (51.1% girls) aged 11, 13, and 15 years who participated in the Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey in 2018 in Greece, Israel, Italy, Macedonia, Malta, Portugal, and Spain. Bivariate logistic regressions were conducted to test the relationship between risk behaviors, resilience, and bullying. All risk behaviors and lack of resiliency factors examined were related to involvement in bullying as a victim, perpetrator, or bully-victim, both in school and cyberbullying. Moreover, the odds of involvement in school bullying and cyberbullying increased as the number of risk behaviors and the lack of resiliency factors grew. Our results may contribute to the development and implementation of anti-bullying programs.KEYWORDS: Bullyingcyberbullyingrisk behaviorsresiliency factors Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Institutional review board statementThe study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of HBSC and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Bar Ilan University (code RO-10203) (05//2018).Informed consent statementInformed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the studyAdditional informationFundingThis research was funded by grants from them ministries of health, education, and public security. The Israel HBSC research team is supported by the Department of Health. Funding number: 430/21.Notes on contributorsRotem MaorRotem Maor has a Ph.D. in Education, is a Lecturer at David Yellin College of Education in Israel. Her main research interests include: social rejection, bullying and cyberbullying.Tesler RikiDr. Tesler Riki is currently a lecturer in the Department of Health Systems Management at Ariel University in Ariel, Israel. She lectures on the topics of health education and promotion, epidemiology, the sociology of health, and risk and health behaviors among teenagers and adults, with a particular emphasis on intervention programs. She is a researcher connected to the international Health Behavior in School-Aged Children (HBSC) program, which focuses on the health and welfare of children and youth.Giladi ArielaGiladi Ariela received her Ph.D. in education from Ariel University, Israel, where she presently lectures. She is a postdoctoral researcher at the HBSC-Israel, an international research program on adolescent well-being and health, at Bar Ilan University Faculty of Education. Her focus of research includes higher education, foreign language learning, self-efficacy, effort, wellbeing, adolescents, risk behaviors, and emotional health.Ben-Meir LilachLilach Ben-Meir received her Ph.D. in psychology from Ariel Un","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136032995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2269525
Alexander L. Burton, Haley N. Puddy, Sunmin Hong, Velmer S. Burton, William T. Miller
ABSTRACTEach year, thousands of prospective students are denied admission to universities because they possess a criminal record. Prior research finds that university officials and faculty are generally accepting of those with records attending universities. To date, few studies have examined the perspectives of college students on this matter. The current study adds to this literature by examining college students’ (n = 846) attitudes toward denying individuals admission to universities based on possessing a criminal record. The results reveal general opposition toward denying prospective students solely on the basis of possessing a record. However, divisions exist among students and fall on factors related to criminal justice system contact and racial, punitive, and political viewpoints.KEYWORDS: attitudescollege admissionscriminal recordssurvey research Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAlexander L. BurtonAlexander L. Burton is an Assistant Professor in the Criminology and Criminal Justice Program at The University of Texas at Dallas. His research primarily focuses on crorrections and public policy and has been published in Criminology, Criminology & Public Policy, and Justice Quarterly.Haley N. PuddyHaley N. Puddy is a doctoral student in the Criminology and Criminal Justice Program at The University of Texas at Dallas. Her research interests include crime and justice policySunmin HongSunmin Hong is a doctoral student in the Criminology and Criminal Justice Program at The Univeristy of Texas at Dallas. His resaerch interests include cybercrime, cyberspace, and criminal record-related policies.Velmer S. BurtonVelmer S. Burton Jr. is a Fellow in the Center for Justice and Communities at the University of Cincinnati. His research has been published in Criminology, the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, and Justice Quarterly.William T. MillerWilliam T. Miller is a Research Associate at the University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research. His research focuses on the evaluation of court programs and policies intended to increase access to justice for marginalized groups.
每年都有成千上万的准学生因为有犯罪记录而被大学拒之门外。先前的研究发现,大学官员和教师普遍接受那些有大学记录的人。到目前为止,很少有研究调查了大学生对这个问题的看法。目前的研究通过调查大学生(n = 846)对基于拥有犯罪记录而拒绝个人进入大学的态度来补充这一文献。调查结果显示,人们普遍反对仅仅因为拥有记录而拒绝未来的学生。然而,学生之间存在分歧,并落在与刑事司法系统接触以及种族,惩罚和政治观点有关的因素上。关键词:态度;大学录取;犯罪记录;调查研究;亚历山大·l·伯顿(alexander L. Burton)是德克萨斯大学达拉斯分校犯罪学和刑事司法项目的助理教授。他的研究主要集中在矫正和公共政策上,并在《犯罪学》、《犯罪学与公共政策》和《司法季刊》上发表过文章。Haley N. Puddy是德克萨斯大学达拉斯分校犯罪学和刑事司法项目的博士生。她的研究兴趣包括犯罪和司法政策。洪宣敏,德克萨斯大学达拉斯分校犯罪学和刑事司法项目博士生。他的研究兴趣包括网络犯罪、网络空间和犯罪记录相关政策。威尔默·s·伯顿,辛辛那提大学司法与社区中心研究员。他的研究成果发表在《犯罪学》、《犯罪与犯罪研究杂志》、《定量犯罪学杂志》和《司法季刊》上。William T. Miller是辛辛那提大学刑事司法研究中心的研究助理。他的研究重点是评估旨在增加边缘化群体诉诸司法的法院项目和政策。
{"title":"College Students’ Attitudes Toward Denying Admission to Prospective Students with Criminal Records","authors":"Alexander L. Burton, Haley N. Puddy, Sunmin Hong, Velmer S. Burton, William T. Miller","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2269525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2269525","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTEach year, thousands of prospective students are denied admission to universities because they possess a criminal record. Prior research finds that university officials and faculty are generally accepting of those with records attending universities. To date, few studies have examined the perspectives of college students on this matter. The current study adds to this literature by examining college students’ (n = 846) attitudes toward denying individuals admission to universities based on possessing a criminal record. The results reveal general opposition toward denying prospective students solely on the basis of possessing a record. However, divisions exist among students and fall on factors related to criminal justice system contact and racial, punitive, and political viewpoints.KEYWORDS: attitudescollege admissionscriminal recordssurvey research Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAlexander L. BurtonAlexander L. Burton is an Assistant Professor in the Criminology and Criminal Justice Program at The University of Texas at Dallas. His research primarily focuses on crorrections and public policy and has been published in Criminology, Criminology & Public Policy, and Justice Quarterly.Haley N. PuddyHaley N. Puddy is a doctoral student in the Criminology and Criminal Justice Program at The University of Texas at Dallas. Her research interests include crime and justice policySunmin HongSunmin Hong is a doctoral student in the Criminology and Criminal Justice Program at The Univeristy of Texas at Dallas. His resaerch interests include cybercrime, cyberspace, and criminal record-related policies.Velmer S. BurtonVelmer S. Burton Jr. is a Fellow in the Center for Justice and Communities at the University of Cincinnati. His research has been published in Criminology, the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, and Justice Quarterly.William T. MillerWilliam T. Miller is a Research Associate at the University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research. His research focuses on the evaluation of court programs and policies intended to increase access to justice for marginalized groups.","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136114577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-06DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2266800
Caimeng Liu, Guangzhe Frank Yuan, Hong Wang Fung, Jingjing Zhao, Wei Shi, Yuanyuan An, Jiaxin Liu
ABSTRACTPrior research has documented that mindfulness is negatively associated with aggressive behaviors. Recently, studies have examined mediating psychological constructs that account for the relationships between mindfulness and cyberbullying perpetration. The purpose of the current study was to examine the longitudinal relationship between mindfulness and cyberbullying behaviors through the mediating variables of self-esteem and empathy. This study used a two-wave longitudinal design. The final sample consisted of 661 Chinese junior high school students. Participants completed four self-report questionnaires including mindfulness, self-esteem, empathy, and cyberbullying perpetration. Structural equation modeling revealed that mindfulness was significantly related to cyberbullying perpetration over time. Self-esteem and empathy significantly mediated the relationship between mindfulness and cyberbullying. Future research may focus on the potential mechanisms linking mindfulness and other protective factors with cyberbullying perpetration to facilitate the development and use of cyberbullying interventions.KEYWORDS: Mindfulnesscyberbullying perpetrationself-esteemempathyadolescents AcknowledgmentsCL and GFY contributed equally to this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Authorship contribution statementCL and GFY designed the study, performed data analysis, and wrote the initial manuscript. HWF, JZ, SW, and YA performed data interpretation, editing, and gave critical review. JZ and JL assisted in data collection and gave critical review. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript for submission.Additional informationFundingCaimeng Liu’s work is supported by a research grant (CSXL-22231) from Chengdu Medical College - Sichuan Applied Psychology Research Center.Notes on contributorsCaimeng LiuMs. Caimeng Liu is a lecturer in the School of Education Science at Leshan Normal University. Her research interests include the mental health of children and adolescents in China.Guangzhe Frank YuanDr. Guangzhe F. Yuan is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior at the University of South Carolina. His recent research has focused on the mental health problems of people living with HIV and psychological distress in adolescents and young adults.Hong Wang FungDr. Hong Wang Fung is a postdoctoral fellow with congenital disabilities in Hong Kong. Expertise/Research focus: Mental health, trauma, complex PTSD, dissociation, psychosocial care, and ICT in health and social services.Jingjing ZhaoMs. Jingjing Zhao is a psychological counselor specializing in adolescent mental health issues.Wei ShiDr. Wei Shi is an associate professor at Sichuan University. Her main research interests are: disasters and mental health, trauma exposure and psychological development, and psychological counseling and treatment.Yuanyuan AnDr. Yuanyuan An is an associate p
{"title":"Mediating Roles of Self-Esteem and Empathy in the Relation Between Mindfulness and Cyberbullying Perpetration Among Adolescents: A Longitudinal Perspective","authors":"Caimeng Liu, Guangzhe Frank Yuan, Hong Wang Fung, Jingjing Zhao, Wei Shi, Yuanyuan An, Jiaxin Liu","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2266800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2266800","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPrior research has documented that mindfulness is negatively associated with aggressive behaviors. Recently, studies have examined mediating psychological constructs that account for the relationships between mindfulness and cyberbullying perpetration. The purpose of the current study was to examine the longitudinal relationship between mindfulness and cyberbullying behaviors through the mediating variables of self-esteem and empathy. This study used a two-wave longitudinal design. The final sample consisted of 661 Chinese junior high school students. Participants completed four self-report questionnaires including mindfulness, self-esteem, empathy, and cyberbullying perpetration. Structural equation modeling revealed that mindfulness was significantly related to cyberbullying perpetration over time. Self-esteem and empathy significantly mediated the relationship between mindfulness and cyberbullying. Future research may focus on the potential mechanisms linking mindfulness and other protective factors with cyberbullying perpetration to facilitate the development and use of cyberbullying interventions.KEYWORDS: Mindfulnesscyberbullying perpetrationself-esteemempathyadolescents AcknowledgmentsCL and GFY contributed equally to this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Authorship contribution statementCL and GFY designed the study, performed data analysis, and wrote the initial manuscript. HWF, JZ, SW, and YA performed data interpretation, editing, and gave critical review. JZ and JL assisted in data collection and gave critical review. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript for submission.Additional informationFundingCaimeng Liu’s work is supported by a research grant (CSXL-22231) from Chengdu Medical College - Sichuan Applied Psychology Research Center.Notes on contributorsCaimeng LiuMs. Caimeng Liu is a lecturer in the School of Education Science at Leshan Normal University. Her research interests include the mental health of children and adolescents in China.Guangzhe Frank YuanDr. Guangzhe F. Yuan is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior at the University of South Carolina. His recent research has focused on the mental health problems of people living with HIV and psychological distress in adolescents and young adults.Hong Wang FungDr. Hong Wang Fung is a postdoctoral fellow with congenital disabilities in Hong Kong. Expertise/Research focus: Mental health, trauma, complex PTSD, dissociation, psychosocial care, and ICT in health and social services.Jingjing ZhaoMs. Jingjing Zhao is a psychological counselor specializing in adolescent mental health issues.Wei ShiDr. Wei Shi is an associate professor at Sichuan University. Her main research interests are: disasters and mental health, trauma exposure and psychological development, and psychological counseling and treatment.Yuanyuan AnDr. Yuanyuan An is an associate p","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135352383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACTMost college students do not report sexual violence (SV) incidents reportable under Title IX to their universities. Several studies focus on Title IX in regard to gender equality in sports or SV survivors’ perceptions of their Title IX experience. However, few studies examine the knowledge and perceptions of Title IX of the general college student body using qualitative methods. This study expands upon this literature by exploring college students’ perspectives on Title IX, including the most recent amendments to Title IX regulations. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with 55 students with different levels of Title IX experience at one university. The results show that, with the exception of students with Title IX experience, most students lack knowledge about Title IX regulations and procedures, but all students had high expectations of the Title IX office. There is also skepticism and confusion surrounding changes to Title IX regulations.KEYWORDS: Sexual violenceTitle IXvictimizationdiscriminationcollege students Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHSS) and the Office of Graduate Education, George Mason University.Notes on contributorsLindsay SmithLindsay Smith Lindsay Smith completed her master’s degree in Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University. As a doctoral candidate in Criminology, Law and Society, she works as a graduate research assistant for the Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence! Her research interests include gender and corrections with an emphasis on reintegration success, gender-based violence, and sexual victimization.Pallie SwartzPallie Swartz Pallie Swartz completed her undergraduate degrees in psychology and criminology at Kansas State University, and her master’s degree in Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University. She is completing her law degree at the University of Missouri – Kansas City and plans to practice family law, focusing on domestic and sexual violence, education, and disability law.Yasemin Irvin-EricksonYasemin Irvin-Erickson Dr. Yasemin Irvin-Erickson is an Assistant Professor of Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University. She primarily conducts research in the areas of victimization and violence.
{"title":"“Information is power:” Promoting a Safer Environment for College Students to Report Sexual Violence","authors":"Lindsay Smith, Pallie Swartz, Yasemin Irvin-Erickson","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2264178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2264178","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMost college students do not report sexual violence (SV) incidents reportable under Title IX to their universities. Several studies focus on Title IX in regard to gender equality in sports or SV survivors’ perceptions of their Title IX experience. However, few studies examine the knowledge and perceptions of Title IX of the general college student body using qualitative methods. This study expands upon this literature by exploring college students’ perspectives on Title IX, including the most recent amendments to Title IX regulations. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with 55 students with different levels of Title IX experience at one university. The results show that, with the exception of students with Title IX experience, most students lack knowledge about Title IX regulations and procedures, but all students had high expectations of the Title IX office. There is also skepticism and confusion surrounding changes to Title IX regulations.KEYWORDS: Sexual violenceTitle IXvictimizationdiscriminationcollege students Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHSS) and the Office of Graduate Education, George Mason University.Notes on contributorsLindsay SmithLindsay Smith Lindsay Smith completed her master’s degree in Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University. As a doctoral candidate in Criminology, Law and Society, she works as a graduate research assistant for the Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence! Her research interests include gender and corrections with an emphasis on reintegration success, gender-based violence, and sexual victimization.Pallie SwartzPallie Swartz Pallie Swartz completed her undergraduate degrees in psychology and criminology at Kansas State University, and her master’s degree in Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University. She is completing her law degree at the University of Missouri – Kansas City and plans to practice family law, focusing on domestic and sexual violence, education, and disability law.Yasemin Irvin-EricksonYasemin Irvin-Erickson Dr. Yasemin Irvin-Erickson is an Assistant Professor of Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University. She primarily conducts research in the areas of victimization and violence.","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136279853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-24DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2261365
Chaoyue Wu, Ron A. Astor, Rami Benbenishty
ABSTRACTThe current study longitudinally investigated how personal (depression) and family (parental monitoring) factors affect middle school peer victimization through school factors (academic performance, risky peer influence, and school belongingness) in mainland China. This study relied on large-scale 3-year longitudinal national data from mainland China with a sample of 8,357 middle school students who participated in all three waves. The results of structural equation modeling indicate that parental monitoring in Wave 1 did not predict peer victimization in Wave 3 directly, but it showed a significant indirect impact on peer victimization in Wave 3 through academic performance, risky peer influence, and school belongingness in Wave 2. Depression in Wave 1 was directly associated with peer victimization in Wave 3 and indirectly affected peer victimization in Wave 3 through academic performance, risky peer influence, and school belongingness in Wave 2. Practical implications are discussed.KEYWORDS: Peer victimizationdepressionparental monitoringrisky peersschool belongingness Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsChaoyue WuChaoyue Wu is a Ph.D student in Social Welfare at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. Her research focuses on examining risk factors for violence involvement and the negative impacts of victimization experience on mental and behavioral health among marginalized children and adolescents.Ron A. AstorRon A. Astor holds the Marjory Crump Chair Professorship in Social Welfare at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, with a joint appointment in the UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies. His work examines the role of the physical, social-organizational, and cultural contexts in schools related to different kinds of school violence.Rami BenbenishtyRami Benbenishty is a Professor emeritus at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. His main areas of interest are the safety, welfare, and wellbeing of children, both in community normative settings, such as schools, and in out of home placements, such as foster homes and residential care.
摘要本研究通过学校因素(学业成绩、同伴风险影响和学校归属感)对中国大陆中学生同伴侵害行为的影响进行了纵向调查,考察了个人(抑郁)和家庭(父母监控)因素对中学生同伴侵害行为的影响。本研究依赖于中国大陆的大规模3年纵向国家数据,样本为8357名中学生,他们参与了这三次浪潮。结构方程模型的结果表明,第一波父母监控不能直接预测第三波同伴受害,但通过第二波学业成绩、同伴风险影响和学校归属感对第三波同伴受害有显著的间接影响。第一波抑郁与第三波同伴受害直接相关,并通过第二波学业成绩、同伴风险影响和学校归属感间接影响第三波同伴受害。讨论了实际意义。关键词:同伴受害;抑郁症;父母监控;可怕的同伴;本文作者吴朝岳是加州大学洛杉矶分校鲁斯金公共事务学院社会福利专业的博士生。她的研究重点是研究暴力参与的风险因素以及受害经历对边缘化儿童和青少年心理和行为健康的负面影响。Ron a . Astor现任加州大学洛杉矶分校鲁斯金公共事务学院社会福利Marjory Crump讲座教授,并在加州大学洛杉矶分校教育与信息研究研究生院担任联合任命。他的工作考察了与不同类型的校园暴力有关的学校的物理,社会组织和文化背景的作用。Rami Benbenishty是耶路撒冷希伯来大学的名誉教授。他的主要兴趣领域是儿童的安全、福利和福祉,既包括社区规范环境(如学校),也包括家庭外安置(如寄养家庭和寄宿护理)。
{"title":"A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study of School Factors as Mediators from Depression and Parental Monitoring to Peer Victimization in Mainland Chinese Middle Schools","authors":"Chaoyue Wu, Ron A. Astor, Rami Benbenishty","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2261365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2261365","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe current study longitudinally investigated how personal (depression) and family (parental monitoring) factors affect middle school peer victimization through school factors (academic performance, risky peer influence, and school belongingness) in mainland China. This study relied on large-scale 3-year longitudinal national data from mainland China with a sample of 8,357 middle school students who participated in all three waves. The results of structural equation modeling indicate that parental monitoring in Wave 1 did not predict peer victimization in Wave 3 directly, but it showed a significant indirect impact on peer victimization in Wave 3 through academic performance, risky peer influence, and school belongingness in Wave 2. Depression in Wave 1 was directly associated with peer victimization in Wave 3 and indirectly affected peer victimization in Wave 3 through academic performance, risky peer influence, and school belongingness in Wave 2. Practical implications are discussed.KEYWORDS: Peer victimizationdepressionparental monitoringrisky peersschool belongingness Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsChaoyue WuChaoyue Wu is a Ph.D student in Social Welfare at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. Her research focuses on examining risk factors for violence involvement and the negative impacts of victimization experience on mental and behavioral health among marginalized children and adolescents.Ron A. AstorRon A. Astor holds the Marjory Crump Chair Professorship in Social Welfare at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, with a joint appointment in the UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies. His work examines the role of the physical, social-organizational, and cultural contexts in schools related to different kinds of school violence.Rami BenbenishtyRami Benbenishty is a Professor emeritus at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. His main areas of interest are the safety, welfare, and wellbeing of children, both in community normative settings, such as schools, and in out of home placements, such as foster homes and residential care.","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135925974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-24DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2261361
Leah E. Daigle, Raven B. Muñoz, Katelyn P. Hancock
ABSTRACTA small body of research has identified a positive relationship between food insecurity and victimization risk, including intimate partner violence and sexual violence victimization as well as experiencing and witnessing childhood violence in the home. The question remains whether food insecurity is related to sexual victimization among college students, and if so, what mechanisms link the two. We use data from the American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment, a national sample of college students, to investigate these relationships. We find that low and very low food security increases the odds of sexual victimization, and that both are tied to increased odds of experiencing moderate to severe stress, depression, anxiety, binge drinking, and drug use. Institutions of higher learning may benefit from programs to address food insecurity. Doing so may have the corollary benefit of influencing mental health and health risk behaviors in ways that could reduce sexual victimization.KEYWORDS: Sexual victimizationfood insecuritycollege studentsstress Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Respondents were asked to write in their identification if they selected the other category. Those who wrote an option that fit into one of the noted categories were coded as such, and those who were not clearly identifiable as one of these groups but noted a racial/ethnic/national group (e.g., German) were coded as Other. Those who did not wish to indicate or wrote in something nonsensical or nonidentifiable were coded as missing.2. Persons who wrote in a response that matched one of these categories when selecting “Other” were coded accordingly or in the Other category. Those who wrote in a response that was nonsensical or nonidentifiable were coded as missing. Those who wrote in a response that indicated cisgender were coded according to their response on the biological sex variable (e.g., those who indicated being cisgender and female at birth were coded as woman or female on the gender identity variable).3. Those who wrote in a response when selecting other who identified one of the categories present in this study were coded as that category. Those who wrote in a response that was determined to be made up or noninterpretable (e.g., hopeless) or who chose not to answer were coded as missing.4. When using a Bonferroni correction for planned comparisons for the effect between food security and the mediators, all significant findings remain (adjusted p-value =.004).Additional informationNotes on contributorsLeah E. DaigleDr. Leah E. Daigle is Professor in the Department of Criminal Justice in the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University. Her most recent research has centered on recurring victimization, sexual victimization of college women, and the development and continuation of victimization across the life course. She is coauthor of Criminals in the Mak
一项小型研究已经确定了粮食不安全与受害风险之间的正相关关系,包括亲密伴侣暴力和性暴力受害以及在家庭中经历和目睹儿童暴力。问题仍然是食品不安全是否与大学生中的性侵害有关,如果是的话,是什么机制将两者联系起来。我们使用的数据来自美国大学健康协会的全国大学健康评估,这是一个全国性的大学生样本,来调查这些关系。我们发现,低和非常低的食品安全增加了性侵害的几率,这两者都与经历中度到重度压力、抑郁、焦虑、酗酒和吸毒的几率增加有关。高等院校可以从解决粮食不安全问题的项目中受益。这样做可能会产生影响心理健康和健康风险行为的必然好处,从而减少性侵害。关键词:性侵害;食品不安全;大学生压力;披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。受访者被要求在他们的身份证明,如果他们选择了其他类别。那些写的选项符合其中一个所述类别的人被编码为此类,而那些不能明确识别为这些类别之一但注明种族/民族/国家群体的人(例如,德国人)被编码为其他。那些不想指出或写一些无意义或不可识别的东西的人被编码为失踪。当选择“其他”时,在回复中填写匹配这些类别之一的人被相应地编码或在其他类别中编码。那些写了毫无意义或无法识别的回复的人被编码为失踪。那些在回复中注明“顺性别”的人根据他们在生理性别变量上的回答进行编码(例如,那些在出生时注明“顺性别”和“女性”的人在性别认同变量上被编码为女性或女性)。那些在选择其他识别本研究中存在的一个类别的人时写回复的人被编码为该类别。那些在回复中被认定是编造的或无法解释的(例如,无望的)或选择不回答的人被归类为失踪。当使用Bonferroni校正来计划比较食品安全和中介因素之间的影响时,所有显著的发现仍然存在(调整p值= 0.004)。作者简介:sleah E. DaigleDr。利亚·e·戴格尔(Leah E. Daigle)是乔治亚州立大学安德鲁·杨政策研究学院刑事司法系教授。她最近的研究集中在反复出现的受害者,大学女性的性受害者,以及受害者在整个生命过程中的发展和持续。她是《正在形成的罪犯:整个生命过程中的犯罪行为》(第二版)和《象牙塔中的不安全:大学女性的性受害》的合著者,该书被刑事司法科学院授予2011年杰出图书奖,她还著有《受害者学:文本/读者》(第二版)和《受害者学:要点》(第二版)。她被授予2014年安德鲁·杨研究政策学院卓越教学奖和2020年美国犯罪学学会邦尼·s·费舍尔受害者学职业奖。Raven B. MuñozRaven B. Muñoz是乔治亚州立大学刑事司法和犯罪学系的博士生。她的研究兴趣是性暴力、受害和性暴力预防工作。凯特琳·p·汉考克,博士,查塔努加田纳西大学社会、文化和司法研究系刑事司法助理教授。她的研究兴趣是不同群体的受害者,多重受害者,性侵犯和亲密伴侣暴力。她最近的出版物发表在《刑事司法种族杂志》、《人际暴力杂志》、《美国刑事司法杂志》和《刑事司法教育杂志》。她是乔治亚州立大学刑事司法和犯罪学系2020年研究生领导奖和2021年卓越教学奖的获得者。她是刑事司法科学学院的博士峰会研究员,并获得了南方刑事司法协会颁发的2022年杰出博士生奖。
{"title":"Exploring the Connection Between Food Insecurity and Sexual Victimization Among College Students","authors":"Leah E. Daigle, Raven B. Muñoz, Katelyn P. Hancock","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2261361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2261361","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTA small body of research has identified a positive relationship between food insecurity and victimization risk, including intimate partner violence and sexual violence victimization as well as experiencing and witnessing childhood violence in the home. The question remains whether food insecurity is related to sexual victimization among college students, and if so, what mechanisms link the two. We use data from the American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment, a national sample of college students, to investigate these relationships. We find that low and very low food security increases the odds of sexual victimization, and that both are tied to increased odds of experiencing moderate to severe stress, depression, anxiety, binge drinking, and drug use. Institutions of higher learning may benefit from programs to address food insecurity. Doing so may have the corollary benefit of influencing mental health and health risk behaviors in ways that could reduce sexual victimization.KEYWORDS: Sexual victimizationfood insecuritycollege studentsstress Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Respondents were asked to write in their identification if they selected the other category. Those who wrote an option that fit into one of the noted categories were coded as such, and those who were not clearly identifiable as one of these groups but noted a racial/ethnic/national group (e.g., German) were coded as Other. Those who did not wish to indicate or wrote in something nonsensical or nonidentifiable were coded as missing.2. Persons who wrote in a response that matched one of these categories when selecting “Other” were coded accordingly or in the Other category. Those who wrote in a response that was nonsensical or nonidentifiable were coded as missing. Those who wrote in a response that indicated cisgender were coded according to their response on the biological sex variable (e.g., those who indicated being cisgender and female at birth were coded as woman or female on the gender identity variable).3. Those who wrote in a response when selecting other who identified one of the categories present in this study were coded as that category. Those who wrote in a response that was determined to be made up or noninterpretable (e.g., hopeless) or who chose not to answer were coded as missing.4. When using a Bonferroni correction for planned comparisons for the effect between food security and the mediators, all significant findings remain (adjusted p-value =.004).Additional informationNotes on contributorsLeah E. DaigleDr. Leah E. Daigle is Professor in the Department of Criminal Justice in the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University. Her most recent research has centered on recurring victimization, sexual victimization of college women, and the development and continuation of victimization across the life course. She is coauthor of Criminals in the Mak","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135926146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-05DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2255131
Peter S. Lehmann
ABSTRACT Prior research has shown that Black and Hispanic students are more likely to experience office discipline referrals than White youth, and the magnitude of these inequalities has been found to vary by gender. However, it remains unclear whether racial/ethnic and gender disparities in office referrals might be amplified among students in more disruptive classroom environments. Analyses of data from the 2012–2021 8th/10th grade cohorts of the Monitoring the Future survey (N = 70,442) reveal that, among male youth, Black- and Hispanic-White differences in office referrals are substantially weaker for students who describe their classrooms as more disruptive. In contrast, the heightened risk of an office referral for minority female students relative to White females increases in correspondence with higher levels of classroom disruptiveness.
{"title":"Classroom Disruptiveness and Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Office Discipline Referrals","authors":"Peter S. Lehmann","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2255131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2255131","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prior research has shown that Black and Hispanic students are more likely to experience office discipline referrals than White youth, and the magnitude of these inequalities has been found to vary by gender. However, it remains unclear whether racial/ethnic and gender disparities in office referrals might be amplified among students in more disruptive classroom environments. Analyses of data from the 2012–2021 8th/10th grade cohorts of the Monitoring the Future survey (N = 70,442) reveal that, among male youth, Black- and Hispanic-White differences in office referrals are substantially weaker for students who describe their classrooms as more disruptive. In contrast, the heightened risk of an office referral for minority female students relative to White females increases in correspondence with higher levels of classroom disruptiveness.","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43761123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-23DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2248870
Suravi Changlani, Lyndsay N. Jenkins, Yanyun Yang
ABSTRACT This study aimed to extend the literature by examining how bystander intervention (i.e. when a witness to a bullying episodes does something to address the situation) varies with respect to the type of bystander intervention (i.e. direct intervention, emotional intervention, involving an adult, ignore) across victim status (friend, unknown), intervener age (elementary, high school), and dimensions of empathy (affective, cognitive) in the intervener. Given substantive differences in both empathy (especially cognitive empathy) and bystander intervention when comparing children to older adolescents, the association between empathy and intervening may differ across age groups. Self-report survey data were collected from 370 racially diverse participants in grades 3–5 ; (n = 158) and grades 9–12 (n = 212) in the southeastern area of the United States. Multi-group path analysis was conducted. Results varied by intervener age, type of intervention, and type of empathy. Affective empathy for high school students was not related to intervention at all, but affective empathy for elementary students was related to emotional intervention. For both age groups, cognitive empathy was related to emotional intervention and reporting to adults for all unknown victims, as well as for known victims in high school students. For known victims, no clear pattern emerged for age groups and how empathy was associated with each type of intervention. Overall, the findings suggest that bystander intervention in bullying is not a “one size fits all” behavior. Bystander intervention programs for bullying should provide more nuanced training regarding types of interventions and encourage empathy and action for both known and unknown victims.
{"title":"Dimensions of Empathy and Bystander Intervention Action in Bullying Across Age","authors":"Suravi Changlani, Lyndsay N. Jenkins, Yanyun Yang","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2248870","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2248870","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aimed to extend the literature by examining how bystander intervention (i.e. when a witness to a bullying episodes does something to address the situation) varies with respect to the type of bystander intervention (i.e. direct intervention, emotional intervention, involving an adult, ignore) across victim status (friend, unknown), intervener age (elementary, high school), and dimensions of empathy (affective, cognitive) in the intervener. Given substantive differences in both empathy (especially cognitive empathy) and bystander intervention when comparing children to older adolescents, the association between empathy and intervening may differ across age groups. Self-report survey data were collected from 370 racially diverse participants in grades 3–5 ; (n = 158) and grades 9–12 (n = 212) in the southeastern area of the United States. Multi-group path analysis was conducted. Results varied by intervener age, type of intervention, and type of empathy. Affective empathy for high school students was not related to intervention at all, but affective empathy for elementary students was related to emotional intervention. For both age groups, cognitive empathy was related to emotional intervention and reporting to adults for all unknown victims, as well as for known victims in high school students. For known victims, no clear pattern emerged for age groups and how empathy was associated with each type of intervention. Overall, the findings suggest that bystander intervention in bullying is not a “one size fits all” behavior. Bystander intervention programs for bullying should provide more nuanced training regarding types of interventions and encourage empathy and action for both known and unknown victims.","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43510643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-23DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2214739
Rebecca R. Ortiz, Andrea M. Smith
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and implementation of a text message intervention to teach adolescents bystander intervention strategies. Adolescents (N = 123) engaged daily for 15 days with bystander education materials and questions sent to them by text message to their personal cell phones. The likelihood to intervene on social media increased over the course of the intervention, but the same was not found for likelihood to intervene in person. The likelihood to intervene in the individual bystander intervention scenarios presented were however significant predictors of likelihood to intervene on social media and in person. This study provides promising preliminary evidence that delivering bystander intervention education to adolescents via their cell phones has the potential to teach them how to recognize and respond as a bystander to bullying and harassment among their peers, especially in online spaces such as social media.
{"title":"Assessing the Feasibility of a Text Message Intervention to Promote Bystander Intervention to Adolescents","authors":"Rebecca R. Ortiz, Andrea M. Smith","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2214739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2214739","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and implementation of a text message intervention to teach adolescents bystander intervention strategies. Adolescents (N = 123) engaged daily for 15 days with bystander education materials and questions sent to them by text message to their personal cell phones. The likelihood to intervene on social media increased over the course of the intervention, but the same was not found for likelihood to intervene in person. The likelihood to intervene in the individual bystander intervention scenarios presented were however significant predictors of likelihood to intervene on social media and in person. This study provides promising preliminary evidence that delivering bystander intervention education to adolescents via their cell phones has the potential to teach them how to recognize and respond as a bystander to bullying and harassment among their peers, especially in online spaces such as social media.","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47078388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-23DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2023.2248875
HyunGyung Joo, Hyemi Lee, Bianca Rodriguez
ABSTRACT This study examines the prevalence of bias-based bullying and the associations among bias-based bullying, negative effects, school avoidance, and supportive adults. Frequency analysis and moderated mediation analysis were conducted using a national sample of adolescents aged 12 to 18 in the U.S. from the 2015, 2017, and 2019 National Crime Victimization Survey School Crime Supplement. Among the adolescents who were bullied between 2015 and 2019 (N = 629 in 2015, N = 1,179 in 2017, and N = 1,197 in 2019), 40.3% − 45.0% of them thought that bullying was related to their race, religion, ethnic origin, disability, gender, sexual orientation, or physical appearance. Among the adolescents who were bullied, the most frequently perceived reason was physical appearance (28.1% − 30.8%), followed by race (10.2% − 11.8%). The presence of supportive adults at school significantly moderates the mediational pathway between experiencing multiple forms of bias-based bullying and school avoidance through the negative effects of bullying.
{"title":"Trends in Bias-Based Bullying from 2015 to 2019 and the Associations Among Bias-Based Bullying, School Avoidance, and Supportive Adults at School","authors":"HyunGyung Joo, Hyemi Lee, Bianca Rodriguez","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2023.2248875","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2248875","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examines the prevalence of bias-based bullying and the associations among bias-based bullying, negative effects, school avoidance, and supportive adults. Frequency analysis and moderated mediation analysis were conducted using a national sample of adolescents aged 12 to 18 in the U.S. from the 2015, 2017, and 2019 National Crime Victimization Survey School Crime Supplement. Among the adolescents who were bullied between 2015 and 2019 (N = 629 in 2015, N = 1,179 in 2017, and N = 1,197 in 2019), 40.3% − 45.0% of them thought that bullying was related to their race, religion, ethnic origin, disability, gender, sexual orientation, or physical appearance. Among the adolescents who were bullied, the most frequently perceived reason was physical appearance (28.1% − 30.8%), followed by race (10.2% − 11.8%). The presence of supportive adults at school significantly moderates the mediational pathway between experiencing multiple forms of bias-based bullying and school avoidance through the negative effects of bullying.","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41455843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}