The sharing economy initially aimed to disrupt traditional financial and ownership business models by creating a new operating logic. However, it has since evolved to resemble the very institutions it sought to challenge. This paper examines the transformation of the sharing economy through the lens of institutionalization, focusing on how its business models have transformed from their original ambitions. The paper theorizes that endogenous mechanisms drive business model content changes, while exogenous ones reshape business model structure and governance. The concept of digital institutionalization is introduced to describe how these mechanisms led the sharing economy to conform to traditional practices. This paper contributes to past research by integrating institutional theory with business model studies and offering insights into the creation and breakdown of new institutional attempts related to digitalization.
{"title":"The Battle of Institutions: Digital and Institutional Disruption in the Transformational Sharing Economy","authors":"Christina Öberg","doi":"10.1002/tie.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The sharing economy initially aimed to disrupt traditional financial and ownership business models by creating a new operating logic. However, it has since evolved to resemble the very institutions it sought to challenge. This paper examines the transformation of the sharing economy through the lens of institutionalization, focusing on how its business models have transformed from their original ambitions. The paper theorizes that endogenous mechanisms drive business model content changes, while exogenous ones reshape business model structure and governance. The concept of digital institutionalization is introduced to describe how these mechanisms led the sharing economy to conform to traditional practices. This paper contributes to past research by integrating institutional theory with business model studies and offering insights into the creation and breakdown of new institutional attempts related to digitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47515,"journal":{"name":"Thunderbird International Business Review","volume":"67 6","pages":"769-781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tie.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145230720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Platform-enabled innovation has come to dominate contemporary discourse on digital sustainability initiatives in emerging markets. Rather than offering a celebratory account of this new turn, this research explores how a digital platform initiative pioneered by Ant Forest leverages a gamified reward system to mobilize emotional incentives, platform integration, and social participation to cultivate what we term “digital green citizenry.” Incentivizing millions of users in China to engage in low-carbon behaviors—such as walking and making digital payments, we unpack how Ant Forest's dual incentive model—combining habit formation with emotional fulfillment—has enabled the integration of sustainability into users' everyday routines. Explicating a culturally grounded transferable framework for digital sustainability, we theorize how platform strategies could be aligned with environmental responsibility and ecological incentives in diverse sociotechnical environments to support digital sustainability.
{"title":"Gamifying Green: Sustainable Innovation Through Digital Platform Ecosystems","authors":"Pengfei Fu, Tong Wu, David Sarpong","doi":"10.1002/tie.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Platform-enabled innovation has come to dominate contemporary discourse on digital sustainability initiatives in emerging markets. Rather than offering a celebratory account of this new turn, this research explores how a digital platform initiative pioneered by Ant Forest leverages a gamified reward system to mobilize emotional incentives, platform integration, and social participation to cultivate what we term “digital green citizenry.” Incentivizing millions of users in China to engage in low-carbon behaviors—such as walking and making digital payments, we unpack how Ant Forest's dual incentive model—combining habit formation with emotional fulfillment—has enabled the integration of sustainability into users' everyday routines. Explicating a culturally grounded transferable framework for digital sustainability, we theorize how platform strategies could be aligned with environmental responsibility and ecological incentives in diverse sociotechnical environments to support digital sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47515,"journal":{"name":"Thunderbird International Business Review","volume":"67 6","pages":"757-768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tie.70006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145230639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectively evaluating and selecting foreign markets is essential for successful internationalization. Traditional International Market Selection (IMS) frameworks typically follow a linear, sequential process: identifying motives, selecting markets, and subsequently determining entry modes. However, such sequential frameworks inadequately account for today's dynamic global market conditions, often resulting in firms entering appropriate markets via an unsuitable entry mode—termed herein as Type III error. Addressing this dangerous error, our study proposes a novel IMS approach that simultaneously integrates market attractiveness and considerations of the suitability of the entry mode selected. Using a dual-criteria ranking method combined with a 45° line analysis, we evaluate 86 prospective international markets across 30 variables. This approach enables firms to align market selection and entry mode decisions from the outset and responds directly to recent research emphasizing their interdependent nature. Our findings reveal that not all markets are analogous, that is, equally attractive for export and FDI, and that some markets are quite distinct, requiring specific entry modes. By adopting this integrated, flexible framework, firms can make more nuanced, strategically coherent internationalization decisions, minimizing risks associated with entry mode misalignment and enhancing their global strategic effectiveness.
{"title":"Optimizing International Market Selection: A Dynamic Approach Integrating Export and FDI Entry Modes","authors":"Yueling Zhou, Emanuel Gomes, Ferran Vendrell-Herrero","doi":"10.1002/tie.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effectively evaluating and selecting foreign markets is essential for successful internationalization. Traditional International Market Selection (IMS) frameworks typically follow a linear, sequential process: identifying motives, selecting markets, and subsequently determining entry modes. However, such sequential frameworks inadequately account for today's dynamic global market conditions, often resulting in firms entering appropriate markets via an unsuitable entry mode—termed herein as Type III error. Addressing this dangerous error, our study proposes a novel IMS approach that simultaneously integrates market attractiveness and considerations of the suitability of the entry mode selected. Using a dual-criteria ranking method combined with a 45° line analysis, we evaluate 86 prospective international markets across 30 variables. This approach enables firms to align market selection and entry mode decisions from the outset and responds directly to recent research emphasizing their interdependent nature. Our findings reveal that not all markets are analogous, that is, equally attractive for export and FDI, and that some markets are quite distinct, requiring specific entry modes. By adopting this integrated, flexible framework, firms can make more nuanced, strategically coherent internationalization decisions, minimizing risks associated with entry mode misalignment and enhancing their global strategic effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47515,"journal":{"name":"Thunderbird International Business Review","volume":"67 6","pages":"739-755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tie.70007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145230603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}