Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1177/15412040261422478
Lin Liu, Michael T. Baglivio
The crime desistance literature highlights employment as a pivotal turning point away from an offender’s lifestyle. While extensive research has explored employment outcomes for adults exiting criminal justice supervision and pursuing reintegration, the economic reintegration of emerging adults under juvenile justice community supervision remains under-studied. Centering the lived experiences of emerging adults (ages 18–21) under juvenile justice community supervision, this longitudinal study investigated the direct and indirect effects of prosocial relationships on employment of this social group. Drawing on three waves of longitudinal data, a mediation analysis was conducted using a bootstrapping technique. Findings revealed that prosocial relationships predicted subsequent growth in social skills and life aspirations among justice-involved young adults (JIYAs), which, in turn, enhanced the likelihood of future employment. Moreover, the relationship between prosocial connections and employment was fully mediated by social skills and life aspirations. These results underscore the critical role of prosocial networks in supporting JIYAs’ reintegration, financial independence, and successful transition into adulthood.
{"title":"Prosocial Relationships and Employment Outcomes Among Justice-Involved Emerging Adults: The Mediating Roles of Social Skills and Life Aspirations","authors":"Lin Liu, Michael T. Baglivio","doi":"10.1177/15412040261422478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040261422478","url":null,"abstract":"The crime desistance literature highlights employment as a pivotal turning point away from an offender’s lifestyle. While extensive research has explored employment outcomes for adults exiting criminal justice supervision and pursuing reintegration, the economic reintegration of emerging adults under juvenile justice community supervision remains under-studied. Centering the lived experiences of emerging adults (ages 18–21) under juvenile justice community supervision, this longitudinal study investigated the direct and indirect effects of prosocial relationships on employment of this social group. Drawing on three waves of longitudinal data, a mediation analysis was conducted using a bootstrapping technique. Findings revealed that prosocial relationships predicted subsequent growth in social skills and life aspirations among justice-involved young adults (JIYAs), which, in turn, enhanced the likelihood of future employment. Moreover, the relationship between prosocial connections and employment was fully mediated by social skills and life aspirations. These results underscore the critical role of prosocial networks in supporting JIYAs’ reintegration, financial independence, and successful transition into adulthood.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146115753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1177/15412040251398475
Richard Dembo, Sheena K. Gardner, Angela A. Robertson, Jennifer Wareham, James Schmeidler
The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), widely used to assess risk and protective factors among justice-involved youth, demonstrates predictive validity with regard to recidivism. At the individual level, the dynamic Individual/Clinical Risk Factor of the SAVRY has previously demonstrated consistent form across gender and race among Mississippi justice-involved youth. Little is known about the factor structure of the Individual/Clinical Risk Factor at the agency level. This study explored a two-level, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the Individual/Clinical Risk measure across 72 Mississippi judicial jurisdictions over a six-year period (2016–2021) involving n = 2,124 delinquent youth. Probit regression analysis examined the relationship of the CFA factor results to within-level and between-level covariates. Findings support the existence of a single factor of Individual/Clinical Risk across the vast majority (88%) of court jurisdictions. The results support the continued use of the SAVRY as an evidence-based measure of risk.
{"title":"Two-Level, Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Single Factor SAVRY Individual/Clinical Risk Measure Across Mississippi Juvenile Court Jurisdictions","authors":"Richard Dembo, Sheena K. Gardner, Angela A. Robertson, Jennifer Wareham, James Schmeidler","doi":"10.1177/15412040251398475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040251398475","url":null,"abstract":"The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), widely used to assess risk and protective factors among justice-involved youth, demonstrates predictive validity with regard to recidivism. At the individual level, the dynamic Individual/Clinical Risk Factor of the SAVRY has previously demonstrated consistent form across gender and race among Mississippi justice-involved youth. Little is known about the factor structure of the Individual/Clinical Risk Factor at the agency level. This study explored a two-level, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the Individual/Clinical Risk measure across 72 Mississippi judicial jurisdictions over a six-year period (2016–2021) involving <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 2,124 delinquent youth. Probit regression analysis examined the relationship of the CFA factor results to within-level and between-level covariates. Findings support the existence of a single factor of Individual/Clinical Risk across the vast majority (88%) of court jurisdictions. The results support the continued use of the SAVRY as an evidence-based measure of risk.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145535544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-13DOI: 10.1177/15412040251398484
Eric J. Connolly, Peter S. Lehmann
{"title":"Editorial Vision Statement","authors":"Eric J. Connolly, Peter S. Lehmann","doi":"10.1177/15412040251398484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040251398484","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145499052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-10DOI: 10.1177/15412040251384124
Jennifer Smith, Brandon Vick
This study investigates the potential causal relationship between the assignment of financial restitution penalties to juvenile offenders and subsequent recidivism, defined as being sentenced for a new offense within the next two years. Although the use of financial penalties on juveniles is prevalent, there is limited research on its potential link to reoffending. Using a dataset of all juvenile offenders in the state of Pennsylvania from 2015 to 2017 ( n = 15,382), we implement a propensity-score matching model to estimate the effects of restitution assignment on future recidivism and test for endogeneity between the two using a control function model. Controlling for offender demographics, criminal history, and offense type and severity, we estimate that restitution assignment increases recidivism rates by 26-percentage points ( p < 0.001) and do not find statistical evidence of endogeneity. Higher rates of recidivism are found for those assigned restitution across all offense grades, categories, and dispositions.
{"title":"Estimating the Effects of Restitution Penalties on Juvenile Recidivism","authors":"Jennifer Smith, Brandon Vick","doi":"10.1177/15412040251384124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040251384124","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the potential causal relationship between the assignment of financial restitution penalties to juvenile offenders and subsequent recidivism, defined as being sentenced for a new offense within the next two years. Although the use of financial penalties on juveniles is prevalent, there is limited research on its potential link to reoffending. Using a dataset of all juvenile offenders in the state of Pennsylvania from 2015 to 2017 ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15,382), we implement a propensity-score matching model to estimate the effects of restitution assignment on future recidivism and test for endogeneity between the two using a control function model. Controlling for offender demographics, criminal history, and offense type and severity, we estimate that restitution assignment increases recidivism rates by 26-percentage points ( <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) and do not find statistical evidence of endogeneity. Higher rates of recidivism are found for those assigned restitution across all offense grades, categories, and dispositions.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145255665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-11DOI: 10.1177/15412040251376875
Jhon A. Pupo
According to the minority threat perspective, racial and ethnic disparities in the justice system can be linked to the size of the minority population in the larger surrounding community. In the juvenile justice system, it is suggested that a larger minority population will be associated with greater punitive treatment, especially of minority defendants. While minority threat has received considerable attention in prior research, much of this work has focused on racial threat (i.e., Black/White). Few juvenile justice studies have tested the ethnic threat hypothesis, and no study has examined the influence of immigrant threat on juvenile court outcomes. To address this gap, the present study examines whether ethnic and immigrant threat at the county level are associated with more punitive juvenile court outcomes, and whether ethnic and immigrant threat amplify ethnic disparities in those outcomes. Findings offered limited support for the study hypotheses. First, ethnic and immigrant threat were both positively and significantly associated with odds of detention, but negatively associated with petition, and had no association with adjudication and disposition outcomes. Second, ethnic and immigrant threat did not moderate ethnic differences in juvenile court outcomes. The implications of the findings for theory, research, and policy are discussed.
{"title":"Does Ethnic Context Influence Ethnic Differences in Juvenile Court Processing? A Test of Ethnic and Immigrant Threat Hypotheses","authors":"Jhon A. Pupo","doi":"10.1177/15412040251376875","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040251376875","url":null,"abstract":"According to the minority threat perspective, racial and ethnic disparities in the justice system can be linked to the size of the minority population in the larger surrounding community. In the juvenile justice system, it is suggested that a larger minority population will be associated with greater punitive treatment, especially of minority defendants. While minority threat has received considerable attention in prior research, much of this work has focused on racial threat (i.e., Black/White). Few juvenile justice studies have tested the ethnic threat hypothesis, and no study has examined the influence of immigrant threat on juvenile court outcomes. To address this gap, the present study examines whether ethnic and immigrant threat at the county level are associated with more punitive juvenile court outcomes, and whether ethnic and immigrant threat amplify ethnic disparities in those outcomes. Findings offered limited support for the study hypotheses. First, ethnic and immigrant threat were both positively and significantly associated with odds of detention, but negatively associated with petition, and had no association with adjudication and disposition outcomes. Second, ethnic and immigrant threat did not moderate ethnic differences in juvenile court outcomes. The implications of the findings for theory, research, and policy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145056738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-16DOI: 10.1177/15412040241313372
A. T. H. Kleeven, E. L. B. Hilterman, E. A. Mulder, A. Popma, M. de Vries Robbé
Forensic interventions aim to mitigate risk, yet research on change measured through repeated risk assessment is scarce, particularly regarding protective factors. This study examined changes in risk and protective factors during intervention and the impact of change on violent recidivism. Trajectories of 175 male justice involved youth with a history of violence were modeled using multilevel mixture modelling. Findings reveal that youths abstaining from violence displayed fewer risk factors and more protective factors at discharge. Assessments at discharge predicted recidivism. Change scores on several SAVRY/SAPROF-YV subscales over time demonstrated incremental predictive validity above and beyond assessments at discharge, emphasizing the necessity of personalized interventions and considering individual change alongside one’s overall risk level to inform more effective interventions. These insights advocate for balanced approaches informed by repeated assessments encompassing both risk and protective factors.
{"title":"Trajectories of Justice Involved Youth: Changing Risk and Protective Factors for Violence","authors":"A. T. H. Kleeven, E. L. B. Hilterman, E. A. Mulder, A. Popma, M. de Vries Robbé","doi":"10.1177/15412040241313372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040241313372","url":null,"abstract":"Forensic interventions aim to mitigate risk, yet research on change measured through repeated risk assessment is scarce, particularly regarding protective factors. This study examined changes in risk and protective factors during intervention and the impact of change on violent recidivism. Trajectories of 175 male justice involved youth with a history of violence were modeled using multilevel mixture modelling. Findings reveal that youths abstaining from violence displayed fewer risk factors and more protective factors at discharge. Assessments at discharge predicted recidivism. Change scores on several SAVRY/SAPROF-YV subscales over time demonstrated incremental predictive validity above and beyond assessments at discharge, emphasizing the necessity of personalized interventions and considering individual change alongside one’s overall risk level to inform more effective interventions. These insights advocate for balanced approaches informed by repeated assessments encompassing both risk and protective factors.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142986780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-13DOI: 10.1177/15412040241308527
Jamie Yoder, Lori Brusman Lovins, Adam Brown, Stuart Berry, Tim Bauerschmidt, Angela Morgan, Nick Tucholski, Jill Haar, Brian Jimenez Fraile
Research has long demonstrated that adolescents with sexual problem behaviors (PSB-A) have variations in developmental antecedents and types of sexually problematic behaviors. The knowledge of adult and adolescent between-group variation has contributed to further complexities in classifying within-group differences in adolescents with typological research being at the forefront of this conversation. Despite some research using existing data sources to create typological distinctions via Latent Class Analysis (LCA), etiological research has not been prospectively integrated consistently or comprehensively when constructing and validating domains that then generate typological distinctions via LCA. The current study partnered with a midwestern specialized court docket to conduct an exploratory formative evaluation in developing and preliminarily validating a PSB-A typology tool that was then used to generate broad typological classifications of PSB-A. This work is an initial exploration study that will be expanded to a larger validation project using larger samples and prospective data collection procedures with the hope of offering court and clinical utility to aid in individualizing treatment and supervision of PSB-A.
{"title":"Evolving in Typological Research: The Development, Exploratory Validation, and Utility of a Typology Tool for Adolescents With Problematic Sexual Behaviors","authors":"Jamie Yoder, Lori Brusman Lovins, Adam Brown, Stuart Berry, Tim Bauerschmidt, Angela Morgan, Nick Tucholski, Jill Haar, Brian Jimenez Fraile","doi":"10.1177/15412040241308527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040241308527","url":null,"abstract":"Research has long demonstrated that adolescents with sexual problem behaviors (PSB-A) have variations in developmental antecedents and types of sexually problematic behaviors. The knowledge of adult and adolescent between-group variation has contributed to further complexities in classifying within-group differences in adolescents with typological research being at the forefront of this conversation. Despite some research using existing data sources to create typological distinctions via Latent Class Analysis (LCA), etiological research has not been prospectively integrated consistently or comprehensively when constructing and validating domains that then generate typological distinctions via LCA. The current study partnered with a midwestern specialized court docket to conduct an exploratory formative evaluation in developing and preliminarily validating a PSB-A typology tool that was then used to generate broad typological classifications of PSB-A. This work is an initial exploration study that will be expanded to a larger validation project using larger samples and prospective data collection procedures with the hope of offering court and clinical utility to aid in individualizing treatment and supervision of PSB-A.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142815672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-06DOI: 10.1177/15412040241305327
Carter Hay, Emily Hargrove, Kimberly M. Davidson, Ashton Cobb
Impact of crime (IOC) interventions are delivered to justice-involved populations to increase sensitivity to and awareness of the harm experienced by crime victims. Such programs are common, but empirical evaluations have been rare. This study addressed that gap by evaluating an IOC intervention used with residential youth in Florida. The study focused on two questions. First, did IOC participants experience improvement on key outcomes? Second, was improvement affected by key individual qualities of youth? Pre- and post-intervention survey data were collected for 419 IOC participants on five outcomes: Sensitivity to victim impact, willingness to take responsibility, antisocial thinking, readiness to make life changes, and factual awareness of victim impact. The analysis revealed that all five outcomes were marked by significant pre-to-post improvements. There was individual variation, with some youth showing substantial improvement and others showing modest improvement or iatrogenic effects. This pattern included modest evidence of greater improvement among those with extensive prior offending and lower improvement among Black youth. We conclude by describing the implications of these findings for the policy and practice of juvenile correctional treatment.
{"title":"Knowing and Caring About the Impact of Crime on Victims: Results From an Intervention for Justice-Involved Youth","authors":"Carter Hay, Emily Hargrove, Kimberly M. Davidson, Ashton Cobb","doi":"10.1177/15412040241305327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040241305327","url":null,"abstract":"Impact of crime (IOC) interventions are delivered to justice-involved populations to increase sensitivity to and awareness of the harm experienced by crime victims. Such programs are common, but empirical evaluations have been rare. This study addressed that gap by evaluating an IOC intervention used with residential youth in Florida. The study focused on two questions. First, did IOC participants experience improvement on key outcomes? Second, was improvement affected by key individual qualities of youth? Pre- and post-intervention survey data were collected for 419 IOC participants on five outcomes: Sensitivity to victim impact, willingness to take responsibility, antisocial thinking, readiness to make life changes, and factual awareness of victim impact. The analysis revealed that all five outcomes were marked by significant pre-to-post improvements. There was individual variation, with some youth showing substantial improvement and others showing modest improvement or iatrogenic effects. This pattern included modest evidence of greater improvement among those with extensive prior offending and lower improvement among Black youth. We conclude by describing the implications of these findings for the policy and practice of juvenile correctional treatment.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142789940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1177/15412040241298282
Jeremiah W. Jaggers, Caitlin Lau, Whitney Howey, Patricia K. Kerig
Research has shown that focusing on patterns across concurrent mental health problems may increase accuracy and treatment efficacy, potentially reducing further justice system involvement. This is critical given that over one-third of girls and two-thirds of boys exhibit significant mental health problems fifteen years after release from detention. The purpose of this study was to identify mental health risk profiles of justice-involved youth. Secondarily, the differentiating impact of trauma and race on those groups was examined. Latent profile analysis was used to identify mental health risk profiles among boys ( n = 3550) and girls ( n = 1212) involved in the juvenile justice system. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the impact of trauma exposure and race on class membership. A 4-class model was determined to have the best fit for both boys and girls. Logistic regression showed that levels of trauma significantly differed across classes. In addition, some racial differences were noted for both boy and girl classification profiles. Results of this study demonstrate that there are patterns of underlying mental health concerns among youth in the juvenile justice system. Moreover, these patterns are associated with traumatic experiences, further demonstrating trauma exposure may be a gateway to other psychosocial challenges.
{"title":"Associations Between Traumatic Experiences and Mental Health Risk Profiles in Youth with Justice System Involvement","authors":"Jeremiah W. Jaggers, Caitlin Lau, Whitney Howey, Patricia K. Kerig","doi":"10.1177/15412040241298282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040241298282","url":null,"abstract":"Research has shown that focusing on patterns across concurrent mental health problems may increase accuracy and treatment efficacy, potentially reducing further justice system involvement. This is critical given that over one-third of girls and two-thirds of boys exhibit significant mental health problems fifteen years after release from detention. The purpose of this study was to identify mental health risk profiles of justice-involved youth. Secondarily, the differentiating impact of trauma and race on those groups was examined. Latent profile analysis was used to identify mental health risk profiles among boys ( n = 3550) and girls ( n = 1212) involved in the juvenile justice system. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the impact of trauma exposure and race on class membership. A 4-class model was determined to have the best fit for both boys and girls. Logistic regression showed that levels of trauma significantly differed across classes. In addition, some racial differences were noted for both boy and girl classification profiles. Results of this study demonstrate that there are patterns of underlying mental health concerns among youth in the juvenile justice system. Moreover, these patterns are associated with traumatic experiences, further demonstrating trauma exposure may be a gateway to other psychosocial challenges.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142597059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1177/15412040241291968
Jennifer H. Peck
Prior research on race/ethnicity and juvenile court processing have found that youth of color often receive disadvantaged outcomes compared to their White counterparts, and that community context may condition this relationship. The current study examined this association between race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and type of drug offense (possession vs. distribution) with adjudication and disposition outcomes, especially the tempering effect of disadvantaged community characteristics. Results from multi-level models indicated that Black youth who were charged with a drug distribution offense were more likely to receive residential placement compared to similarly situated Whites. Underclass poverty and racial/ethnic inequality moderated these associations, but the significance and direction of the results differed depending on the stage examined. The findings reveal ongoing racial/ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system, and offer clearer insights into the conditions under which youth of color charged with different drug offenses are processed in juvenile court.
{"title":"The War on Drugs in Juvenile Court? The Influence of Community Context on Juvenile Court Outcomes for White, Black, and Hispanic Youth","authors":"Jennifer H. Peck","doi":"10.1177/15412040241291968","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040241291968","url":null,"abstract":"Prior research on race/ethnicity and juvenile court processing have found that youth of color often receive disadvantaged outcomes compared to their White counterparts, and that community context may condition this relationship. The current study examined this association between race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and type of drug offense (possession vs. distribution) with adjudication and disposition outcomes, especially the tempering effect of disadvantaged community characteristics. Results from multi-level models indicated that Black youth who were charged with a drug distribution offense were more likely to receive residential placement compared to similarly situated Whites. Underclass poverty and racial/ethnic inequality moderated these associations, but the significance and direction of the results differed depending on the stage examined. The findings reveal ongoing racial/ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system, and offer clearer insights into the conditions under which youth of color charged with different drug offenses are processed in juvenile court.","PeriodicalId":47525,"journal":{"name":"Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142488788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：