首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Robotic Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of patient factors on outcomes in robotic major and minor hepatectomy: importance of patient selection. 患者因素对机器人大、小肝切除术结果的影响:患者选择的重要性。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03152-8
Siman Antar, Inara Merani, Mark G Hall, Sarah D Corn, Ali Ahmad

Robotic approach to hepatectomy has shown promise in recent times. The aim of our study was to identify the impact of various patient variables on outcomes from robotic major and minor hepatectomy. Data on 167 consecutive robotic hepatectomy procedures at our institution was retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed for both minor and major hepatectomy. For major hepatectomy (n = 66), factors associated with increased operative time included cirrhosis (301 vs. 257 min) and obesity (310 vs. 261 min). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was worse in patients with underlying cirrhosis (242 vs. 161 mL), obesity (215 vs. 148mL) and tumor size ≥ 10 cm (232 vs. 136mL). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was also longer with age ≥ 70 years (5.9 vs. 4.5 days), cirrhosis (5.6 vs. 4.6 days) and malignant tumor pathology (5.1 vs. 3.8 days). Similarly, increased postoperative complications were seen with cirrhosis and tumor size ≥ 10 cm. For minor hepatectomy (n = 101), operative time was longer in patients with cirrhosis (139 vs. 105 min), obesity (141 vs. 115 min) and posterior-superior (PS) liver resection (168 vs. 104 min). Similarly, EBL was higher in cirrhotic patients (163 vs. 58mL) and those with PS resection (152 vs. 64mL). Longer LOS was observed in elderly patients (2.9 vs. 2.0 days), cirrhosis (2.9 vs. 2.1 days) and PS resection (2.8 vs. 2.1 days). Our study offers a comprehensive understanding of the impact of clinicopathologic factors on outcomes and can be utilized as a guide to appropriate patient selection, especially for surgeons starting a robotic hepatectomy practice.

近年来,机器人肝切除术已显示出前景。我们研究的目的是确定各种患者变量对机器人大、小肝切除术结果的影响。回顾性分析我院167例连续机器人肝切除术的数据。分析小肝切除术和大肝切除术的围手术期结果。对于大肝切除术(n = 66),与手术时间增加相关的因素包括肝硬化(301对257分钟)和肥胖(310对261分钟)。潜在肝硬化(242 vs 161 mL)、肥胖(215 vs 148mL)和肿瘤大小≥10 cm (232 vs 136mL)患者的估计失血量(EBL)更差。住院时间(LOS)也随着年龄≥70岁(5.9 vs. 4.5天)、肝硬化(5.6 vs. 4.6天)和恶性肿瘤病理(5.1 vs. 3.8天)而变长。同样,肝硬化和肿瘤大小≥10 cm的患者术后并发症增加。对于轻度肝切除术(n = 101),肝硬化(139比105分钟)、肥胖(141比115分钟)和后上(PS)肝切除术(168比104分钟)患者的手术时间更长。同样,肝硬化患者(163比58mL)和PS切除术患者(152比64mL)的EBL更高。老年患者(2.9天vs. 2.0天)、肝硬化患者(2.9天vs. 2.1天)和PS切除术患者(2.8天vs. 2.1天)的LOS较长。我们的研究提供了对临床病理因素对结果的影响的全面理解,可以作为适当患者选择的指导,特别是对于开始机器人肝切除术实践的外科医生。
{"title":"Impact of patient factors on outcomes in robotic major and minor hepatectomy: importance of patient selection.","authors":"Siman Antar, Inara Merani, Mark G Hall, Sarah D Corn, Ali Ahmad","doi":"10.1007/s11701-026-03152-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03152-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic approach to hepatectomy has shown promise in recent times. The aim of our study was to identify the impact of various patient variables on outcomes from robotic major and minor hepatectomy. Data on 167 consecutive robotic hepatectomy procedures at our institution was retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed for both minor and major hepatectomy. For major hepatectomy (n = 66), factors associated with increased operative time included cirrhosis (301 vs. 257 min) and obesity (310 vs. 261 min). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was worse in patients with underlying cirrhosis (242 vs. 161 mL), obesity (215 vs. 148mL) and tumor size ≥ 10 cm (232 vs. 136mL). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was also longer with age ≥ 70 years (5.9 vs. 4.5 days), cirrhosis (5.6 vs. 4.6 days) and malignant tumor pathology (5.1 vs. 3.8 days). Similarly, increased postoperative complications were seen with cirrhosis and tumor size ≥ 10 cm. For minor hepatectomy (n = 101), operative time was longer in patients with cirrhosis (139 vs. 105 min), obesity (141 vs. 115 min) and posterior-superior (PS) liver resection (168 vs. 104 min). Similarly, EBL was higher in cirrhotic patients (163 vs. 58mL) and those with PS resection (152 vs. 64mL). Longer LOS was observed in elderly patients (2.9 vs. 2.0 days), cirrhosis (2.9 vs. 2.1 days) and PS resection (2.8 vs. 2.1 days). Our study offers a comprehensive understanding of the impact of clinicopathologic factors on outcomes and can be utilized as a guide to appropriate patient selection, especially for surgeons starting a robotic hepatectomy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Morbi-mortality of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder carcinoma by urinary diversion type. 机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术的发病率与死亡率。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03059-w
Corentin Deniaud, Benoit Mesnard, Soline Bobet, Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe, Julien Branchereau, Stéphane De Vergie, Jérôme Rigaud

To compare early and late complications rates after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder tumors and certain high-risk non-muscle-invasive tumors according to the type of reconstruction. We conducted a single-center retrospective study including 109 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy between 2008 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on urinary diversion: extracorporeal Bricker ileal conduit (n = 74) or orthotopic neobladder (n = 35). Complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Operative time was significantly longer for neobladder reconstruction (320 vs. 291 min, p = 0.047), as was hospital stay (14 vs. 10 days, p < 0.001). Early complications (< 30 days) occurred in 59.6% of patients, with a higher rate of minor complications in the neobladder group (57.1% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in major complications (Clavien III-V) or late complications (> 30 days), which affected 47.7% of patients. Operative time was an independent risk factor for major complications (OR = 1.15 per additional 15 min). Neobladder reconstruction was associated with increased early morbidity, mainly minor, without impact on late morbidity or mortality. Urinary diversion choice should be guided by patient profile and expected functional benefits.

比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱肌肉浸润性肿瘤与某些高危非肌肉浸润性肿瘤根据重建类型的早期和晚期并发症发生率。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,包括109名在2008年至2022年间接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的患者。患者根据尿分流分为两组:体外砖头回肠导管(n = 74)和原位新膀胱(n = 35)。并发症采用Clavien-Dindo分级。多变量分析确定了发病率和死亡率的独立危险因素。新膀胱重建术的手术时间明显更长(320 vs 291分钟,p = 0.047),住院时间明显更长(14 vs 10天,p = 30天),影响了47.7%的患者。手术时间是主要并发症的独立危险因素(OR = 1.15 /每增加15分钟)。新膀胱重建与早期发病率增加有关,主要是轻微的,对晚期发病率或死亡率没有影响。尿转移的选择应根据患者的情况和预期的功能益处来指导。
{"title":"Morbi-mortality of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder carcinoma by urinary diversion type.","authors":"Corentin Deniaud, Benoit Mesnard, Soline Bobet, Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe, Julien Branchereau, Stéphane De Vergie, Jérôme Rigaud","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03059-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03059-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare early and late complications rates after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder tumors and certain high-risk non-muscle-invasive tumors according to the type of reconstruction. We conducted a single-center retrospective study including 109 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy between 2008 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on urinary diversion: extracorporeal Bricker ileal conduit (n = 74) or orthotopic neobladder (n = 35). Complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Operative time was significantly longer for neobladder reconstruction (320 vs. 291 min, p = 0.047), as was hospital stay (14 vs. 10 days, p < 0.001). Early complications (< 30 days) occurred in 59.6% of patients, with a higher rate of minor complications in the neobladder group (57.1% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in major complications (Clavien III-V) or late complications (> 30 days), which affected 47.7% of patients. Operative time was an independent risk factor for major complications (OR = 1.15 per additional 15 min). Neobladder reconstruction was associated with increased early morbidity, mainly minor, without impact on late morbidity or mortality. Urinary diversion choice should be guided by patient profile and expected functional benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phased active warming protocol for prevention of intraoperative hypothermia in Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer. 达芬奇机器人辅助直肠癌根治术中预防术中低温的阶段性主动升温方案。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03098-3
Hao Ge, Xiaoru Fang, Biqing Dou, Kai Wang

To evaluate the effectiveness of a phased active warming protocol in preventing intraoperative hypothermia during Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer. A single-center retrospective cohort analysis examined patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted rectal cancer resection from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, patients receiving phased active warming protocol were matched with those under routine thermal care. Variables for matching encompassed age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgical duration, and anesthesia time. Primary outcome measured was intraoperative hypothermia incidence (core temperature below 36 °C). Secondary outcomes covered mean core temperature, postoperative shivering evaluated through Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale, surgical site infection rates, blood transfusion needs, hospital stay duration, and perioperative costs. Following propensity score matching, each group contained 144 patients (total n = 288). Hypothermia occurrence dropped markedly in the intervention cohort (26 cases [18.1%] versus 70 cases [48.6%], p < 0.001). End-of-surgery core temperature showed higher values in the intervention cohort (36.4 ± 0.5 °C compared to 35.8 ± 0.6 °C, p < 0.001). Shivering after surgery (BSAS score of 1 or greater) demonstrated reduced frequency in the intervention cohort (18 patients [12.5%] versus 50 patients [34.7%], p < 0.001). Wound infection rates decreased in the intervention cohort (6 cases [4.2%] versus 17 cases [11.8%], p = 0.022). Hospital stays shortened for the intervention cohort (8.2 ± 2.1 days compared to 10.5 ± 3.4 days, p < 0.001). The phased active warming approach substantially decreased hypothermia occurrence and enhanced perioperative outcomes in Da Vinci robot-assisted rectal cancer resection patients, demonstrating clinical value warranting widespread adoption.

评估阶段性主动升温方案在达芬奇机器人辅助直肠癌根治术中预防术中低温的有效性。一项单中心回顾性队列分析研究了2022年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间接受达芬奇机器人辅助直肠癌切除术的患者。采用1:1倾向评分匹配,将接受分阶段主动升温方案的患者与接受常规升温护理的患者进行匹配。匹配变量包括年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师学会分类、手术时间和麻醉时间。测量的主要结果是术中低温发生率(核心温度低于36°C)。次要结果包括平均核心温度、通过床边颤抖评估量表评估的术后颤抖、手术部位感染率、输血需求、住院时间和围手术期费用。根据倾向评分匹配,每组144例患者(总n = 288)。干预组低体温发生率明显下降(26例[18.1%]对70例[48.6%],p
{"title":"Phased active warming protocol for prevention of intraoperative hypothermia in Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer.","authors":"Hao Ge, Xiaoru Fang, Biqing Dou, Kai Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03098-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03098-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of a phased active warming protocol in preventing intraoperative hypothermia during Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer. A single-center retrospective cohort analysis examined patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted rectal cancer resection from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, patients receiving phased active warming protocol were matched with those under routine thermal care. Variables for matching encompassed age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgical duration, and anesthesia time. Primary outcome measured was intraoperative hypothermia incidence (core temperature below 36 °C). Secondary outcomes covered mean core temperature, postoperative shivering evaluated through Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale, surgical site infection rates, blood transfusion needs, hospital stay duration, and perioperative costs. Following propensity score matching, each group contained 144 patients (total n = 288). Hypothermia occurrence dropped markedly in the intervention cohort (26 cases [18.1%] versus 70 cases [48.6%], p < 0.001). End-of-surgery core temperature showed higher values in the intervention cohort (36.4 ± 0.5 °C compared to 35.8 ± 0.6 °C, p < 0.001). Shivering after surgery (BSAS score of 1 or greater) demonstrated reduced frequency in the intervention cohort (18 patients [12.5%] versus 50 patients [34.7%], p < 0.001). Wound infection rates decreased in the intervention cohort (6 cases [4.2%] versus 17 cases [11.8%], p = 0.022). Hospital stays shortened for the intervention cohort (8.2 ± 2.1 days compared to 10.5 ± 3.4 days, p < 0.001). The phased active warming approach substantially decreased hypothermia occurrence and enhanced perioperative outcomes in Da Vinci robot-assisted rectal cancer resection patients, demonstrating clinical value warranting widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia: a systematic review. 机械臂辅助全髋关节置换术治疗髋关节发育不良:系统综述。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03130-6
Ayomide Michael Ade-Conde, James Abesteh, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Brian P Chalmers

This review summarizes radiographic, clinical and patient reported outcomes following robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (RAA-THA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), with comparisons to conventional (C-THA) and navigation (N-THA) techniques. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched for studies on DDH patients undergoing RAA-THA. Outcomes assessed included radiographic accuracy, patient-reported outcome-measures (PROMs), intraoperative outcomes, and complications. Eleven studies were included, analyzing 1150 hips (641 RAA-THA, 383 C-THA, 126 N-THA) with a median patient age of 60.5 years, and median BMI of 24.6. DDH severity was distributed as 59.6% Crowe I, 25.3% Crowe II/III hips, and 15.1% Crowe IV hips. Comparative studies among Crowe I-III hips showed significantly lower errors in cup inclination and anteversion with RAA-THA compared to both C-THA and N-THA. RAA-THA also achieved greater accuracy in restoring the center of rotation for Crowe I-III, but no difference was observed in Crowe IV hips. No significant differences were found in short-term PROMs, and intraoperative outcomes and complication rates were comparable between groups. RAA-THA may improve cup placement accuracy in Crowe I-III hips compared to C-THA and N-THA. However, the accuracy of Crowe IV hips remains unclear, with limited evidence available. Furthermore, radiographic benefits did not translate into significant differences in short-term PROMs, intraoperative outcomes, or complication rates. Future studies should include larger cohorts of patients with severe dysplasia and provide longer follow-up to better evaluate the efficacy and implant survivorship of RAA-THA in these complex cases. Level of Evidence: IV.

本综述总结了机械臂辅助全髋关节置换术(RAA-THA)治疗发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者的影像学、临床和患者报告结果,并与常规(C-THA)和导航(N-THA)技术进行了比较。检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库,查找DDH患者接受RAA-THA的研究。评估的结果包括x线片准确性、患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)、术中结果和并发症。纳入11项研究,分析了1150例髋关节(641例RAA-THA, 383例C-THA, 126例N-THA),患者中位年龄为60.5岁,中位BMI为24.6。DDH严重程度分布为59.6%的Crowe I髋部,25.3%的Crowe II/III髋部和15.1%的Crowe IV髋部。Crowe I-III髋的比较研究显示,与C-THA和N-THA相比,RAA-THA在髋杯倾斜和前倾方面的误差显著降低。RAA-THA在恢复Crowe I-III髋的旋转中心方面也取得了更高的准确性,但在Crowe IV髋中没有观察到差异。短期PROMs无显著差异,两组术中结果和并发症发生率具有可比性。与C-THA和N-THA相比,RAA-THA可以提高Crowe I-III型髋关节的杯杯放置精度。然而,Crowe IV髋的准确性仍然不清楚,证据有限。此外,放射学上的益处并没有转化为短期prom、术中结果或并发症发生率的显著差异。未来的研究应包括更大的严重发育不良患者队列,并提供更长时间的随访,以更好地评估RAA-THA在这些复杂病例中的疗效和植入生存期。证据等级:四级。
{"title":"Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia: a systematic review.","authors":"Ayomide Michael Ade-Conde, James Abesteh, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Brian P Chalmers","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03130-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-025-03130-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review summarizes radiographic, clinical and patient reported outcomes following robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (RAA-THA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), with comparisons to conventional (C-THA) and navigation (N-THA) techniques. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched for studies on DDH patients undergoing RAA-THA. Outcomes assessed included radiographic accuracy, patient-reported outcome-measures (PROMs), intraoperative outcomes, and complications. Eleven studies were included, analyzing 1150 hips (641 RAA-THA, 383 C-THA, 126 N-THA) with a median patient age of 60.5 years, and median BMI of 24.6. DDH severity was distributed as 59.6% Crowe I, 25.3% Crowe II/III hips, and 15.1% Crowe IV hips. Comparative studies among Crowe I-III hips showed significantly lower errors in cup inclination and anteversion with RAA-THA compared to both C-THA and N-THA. RAA-THA also achieved greater accuracy in restoring the center of rotation for Crowe I-III, but no difference was observed in Crowe IV hips. No significant differences were found in short-term PROMs, and intraoperative outcomes and complication rates were comparable between groups. RAA-THA may improve cup placement accuracy in Crowe I-III hips compared to C-THA and N-THA. However, the accuracy of Crowe IV hips remains unclear, with limited evidence available. Furthermore, radiographic benefits did not translate into significant differences in short-term PROMs, intraoperative outcomes, or complication rates. Future studies should include larger cohorts of patients with severe dysplasia and provide longer follow-up to better evaluate the efficacy and implant survivorship of RAA-THA in these complex cases. Level of Evidence: IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic total hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: an RCT-only, GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of operative outcomes and perioperative morbidity. 机器人与传统腹腔镜全子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病:一项仅限随机对照试验、grade评估的手术结果和围手术期发病率的系统评价和荟萃分析
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03142-w
Wajahat Mirza, Farzana Noor, Mahnoor Afridi, Mehak Ejaz Khan, Hania Iqbal, Alishbah Khan

Background: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy has gained widespread adoption for benign gynecologic diseases despite its higher cost and ongoing debate over its clinical superiority compared to conventional laparoscopy. Although many comparative studies exist, no meta-analysis has exclusively synthesized randomized controlled trial evidence with a comprehensive GRADE certainty assessment of all clinically relevant, perioperative outcomes.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251183072). We systematically searched major databases from inception through November 1, 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy (R-TLH) with conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (C-TLH) for benign indications. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for operative duration, estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications. Heterogeneity was quantified using I² statistics, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. The certainty of the evidence for each outcome was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results: Four trials (N = 375 patients) met the inclusion criteria, with 185 and 190 patients in the R-TLH and C-TLH groups, respectively. The total operative time did not differ significantly between the R-TLH and C-TLH groups (mean difference [MD] 11.79 min, 95% CI - 24.59 to 48.17; very low certainty). R-TLH was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (MD - 0.64 days, 95% CI - 1.10 to - 0.17; moderate certainty). No significant differences were observed in conversion to laparotomy (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.10-2.46; low certainty), any postoperative complication (composite as defined by individual trials) (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.21-1.58; moderate certainty), estimated blood loss (MD - 17.81 mL, 95% CI - 74.31 to 38.68; low certainty), or vaginal cuff hematoma (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.05-1.62; low certainty). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results.

Conclusion: Based on the highest level of evidence exclusively from randomized trials, robotic and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy demonstrate comparable operative outcomes for benign disease, with the robotic approach offering modestly shorter hospitalization. Given the substantial cost differences, conventional laparoscopy remains a clinically equivalent option for most patients requiring cholecystectomy.

背景:机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术已被广泛应用于良性妇科疾病,尽管其成本较高,且与传统腹腔镜相比其临床优势仍存在争议。虽然存在许多比较研究,但没有荟萃分析专门合成随机对照试验证据,对所有临床相关的围手术期结果进行全面的GRADE确定性评估。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析采用前瞻性注册(PROSPERO ID: CRD420251183072)。从研究开始到2025年11月1日,我们系统地检索了主要数据库,比较机器人全腹腔镜子宫切除术(R-TLH)和传统全腹腔镜子宫切除术(C-TLH)良性适应症的随机对照试验。两名独立审稿人筛选研究,提取数据,并使用RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险。随机效应荟萃分析包括手术时间、估计失血量、转开腹手术、住院时间和围手术期并发症。采用I²统计量对异质性进行量化,并进行综合敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性。使用GRADE方法评估每个结果证据的确定性。结果:4项试验(N = 375例)符合纳入标准,R-TLH组185例,C-TLH组190例。R-TLH组和C-TLH组的总手术时间无显著差异(平均差异[MD] 11.79 min, 95% CI - 24.59 ~ 48.17,确定性极低)。R-TLH与住院时间显著缩短相关(MD - 0.64天,95% CI - 1.10至- 0.17;中等确定性)。在转为剖腹手术(OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.10-2.46,低确定性)、任何术后并发症(由个别试验定义的复合并发症)(OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.21-1.58,中等确定性)、估计失血量(MD - 17.81 mL, 95% CI - 74.31 - 38.68,低确定性)或阴道袖带血肿(OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.05-1.62,低确定性)方面均无显著差异。敏感性分析得出一致的结果。结论:基于来自随机试验的最高水平的证据,机器人和传统腹腔镜子宫切除术对良性疾病的手术效果相当,机器人方法的住院时间略短。考虑到巨大的成本差异,对于大多数需要胆囊切除术的患者来说,传统腹腔镜仍然是临床等效的选择。
{"title":"Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic total hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: an RCT-only, GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of operative outcomes and perioperative morbidity.","authors":"Wajahat Mirza, Farzana Noor, Mahnoor Afridi, Mehak Ejaz Khan, Hania Iqbal, Alishbah Khan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-026-03142-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-026-03142-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy has gained widespread adoption for benign gynecologic diseases despite its higher cost and ongoing debate over its clinical superiority compared to conventional laparoscopy. Although many comparative studies exist, no meta-analysis has exclusively synthesized randomized controlled trial evidence with a comprehensive GRADE certainty assessment of all clinically relevant, perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251183072). We systematically searched major databases from inception through November 1, 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy (R-TLH) with conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (C-TLH) for benign indications. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for operative duration, estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications. Heterogeneity was quantified using I² statistics, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. The certainty of the evidence for each outcome was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four trials (N = 375 patients) met the inclusion criteria, with 185 and 190 patients in the R-TLH and C-TLH groups, respectively. The total operative time did not differ significantly between the R-TLH and C-TLH groups (mean difference [MD] 11.79 min, 95% CI - 24.59 to 48.17; very low certainty). R-TLH was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (MD - 0.64 days, 95% CI - 1.10 to - 0.17; moderate certainty). No significant differences were observed in conversion to laparotomy (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.10-2.46; low certainty), any postoperative complication (composite as defined by individual trials) (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.21-1.58; moderate certainty), estimated blood loss (MD - 17.81 mL, 95% CI - 74.31 to 38.68; low certainty), or vaginal cuff hematoma (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.05-1.62; low certainty). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the highest level of evidence exclusively from randomized trials, robotic and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy demonstrate comparable operative outcomes for benign disease, with the robotic approach offering modestly shorter hospitalization. Given the substantial cost differences, conventional laparoscopy remains a clinically equivalent option for most patients requiring cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of 5G technology in remote robotic surgery: a comprehensive assessment of system architecture, clinical benefits, and future challenges. 5G技术在远程机器人手术中的应用:系统架构、临床效益和未来挑战的综合评估。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03126-2
Shupei Li, Xue Bai, Tianzuo Wang, Tianyou Wang, Xiao Hu, Boshi Duan

This narrative review synthesizes global advances is paving the way for remote robotic surgery (telerobotic surgery), enabling surgeons to perform precise procedures over long distances with real-time responsiveness. This review synthesizes global advances in this field, outlining the system architecture and discussing reported clinical outcomes from early series-such as reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stays, as illustrated by preliminary clinical series, such as 29 successful remote nephrectomies over 1,775 km reported in a selected patient cohort with no major complications in the short term. Key milestones are highlighted, from early transatlantic experiments to recent ultra-long-range procedures in China. The technology also demonstrates transformative potential for surgical training and optimized resource allocation via hub-and-spoke models. However, current applications remain largely experimental, constrained by small sample sizes, a scarcity of rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and limited long-term data. Significant challenges persist, including network latency and instability-especially beyond 200 ms, which can impair precision-cybersecurity vulnerabilities, a steep surgeon learning curve, high costs, and unresolved ethical-legal concerns regarding liability and cross-border practice. As a cornerstone of digital healthcare, 5G telerobotic surgery holds substantial promise for expanding global access to expert surgical care, provided these technical, economic, and regulatory barriers can be overcome through collaborative standardization and targeted innovation.

这篇叙述性综述综合了全球进展,为远程机器人手术(远程机器人手术)铺平了道路,使外科医生能够在远距离进行实时响应的精确手术。本综述综合了该领域的全球进展,概述了系统架构,并讨论了早期系列报道的临床结果,如术中出血量减少和住院时间缩短,如初步临床系列报道的29例成功的远程肾切除术,在1,775公里的范围内,在短期内没有重大并发症。报告强调了关键的里程碑,从早期的跨大西洋实验到最近在中国进行的超远程手术。该技术还展示了通过轮辐模型进行外科培训和优化资源分配的变革潜力。然而,目前的应用主要是实验性的,受样本量小、缺乏严格的随机对照试验(rct)和有限的长期数据的限制。重大挑战仍然存在,包括网络延迟和不稳定(特别是超过200毫秒,可能会影响精度)、网络安全漏洞、外科医生陡峭的学习曲线、高昂的成本,以及关于责任和跨境实践的未解决的道德法律问题。作为数字医疗保健的基石,只要能够通过协作标准化和有针对性的创新克服这些技术、经济和监管障碍,5G远程机器人手术有望扩大全球获得专家外科护理的机会。
{"title":"Application of 5G technology in remote robotic surgery: a comprehensive assessment of system architecture, clinical benefits, and future challenges.","authors":"Shupei Li, Xue Bai, Tianzuo Wang, Tianyou Wang, Xiao Hu, Boshi Duan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03126-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03126-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This narrative review synthesizes global advances is paving the way for remote robotic surgery (telerobotic surgery), enabling surgeons to perform precise procedures over long distances with real-time responsiveness. This review synthesizes global advances in this field, outlining the system architecture and discussing reported clinical outcomes from early series-such as reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stays, as illustrated by preliminary clinical series, such as 29 successful remote nephrectomies over 1,775 km reported in a selected patient cohort with no major complications in the short term. Key milestones are highlighted, from early transatlantic experiments to recent ultra-long-range procedures in China. The technology also demonstrates transformative potential for surgical training and optimized resource allocation via hub-and-spoke models. However, current applications remain largely experimental, constrained by small sample sizes, a scarcity of rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and limited long-term data. Significant challenges persist, including network latency and instability-especially beyond 200 ms, which can impair precision-cybersecurity vulnerabilities, a steep surgeon learning curve, high costs, and unresolved ethical-legal concerns regarding liability and cross-border practice. As a cornerstone of digital healthcare, 5G telerobotic surgery holds substantial promise for expanding global access to expert surgical care, provided these technical, economic, and regulatory barriers can be overcome through collaborative standardization and targeted innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multimodal CT-ultrasound image-guided robotic system for automated abdominal puncture. 用于自动腹部穿刺的多模态ct超声图像引导机器人系统。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03138-y
Jinhua Li, Hao Yu, Wei Jiao, Shuxi Zhang, Sheng Tian, Jianchang Zhao, Lizhi Pan

Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound provide complementary strengths for image-guided interventions, yet single-modality guidance cannot deliver high spatial resolution, soft-tissue contrast, and real-time feedback simultaneously. This study introduces a multimodal image-guided robotic system designed for precision abdominal puncture based on CT-ultrasound fusion, which aligns preoperative three-dimensional CT images with intraoperative two-dimensional ultrasound images. Optical tracking is adopted to extract CT slices that spatially correspond to the live ultrasound plane, and the spatial alignment between them is achieved via a mutual information algorithm. A compact three-degree-of-freedom puncture actuator is designed, involving entry-point positioning, orientation adjustment, and needle advancement. The actuator rigidly integrates a probe clamping mechanism to preserve image-actuator co-registration. Phantom validation proved anatomically consistent fused displays and reliable guidance of the proposed system, and the puncture trials targeting renal calyces yielded a mean positional error of 1.17 mm and a mean angular error of 0.43°. The compact puncture actuator reduces footprint in the operating room and simplifies the calibration and clinical workflow. The proposed design provides a practical route toward safer and more reproducible minimally invasive abdominal interventions.

计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声为图像引导干预提供了互补的优势,但单模态引导无法同时提供高空间分辨率、软组织对比度和实时反馈。本研究介绍了一种基于CT-超声融合的多模态图像引导机器人系统,该系统将术前三维CT图像与术中二维超声图像对齐,用于腹部精确穿刺。采用光学跟踪提取与活超声平面空间对应的CT切片,通过互信息算法实现CT切片之间的空间对齐。设计了一个紧凑的三自由度穿刺执行器,包括入口点定位,方向调整和针推进。执行器刚性集成探针夹紧机构,以保持图像执行器共配准。幻影验证证明了解剖学上一致的融合显示和所提出系统的可靠引导,针对肾盏的穿刺试验产生的平均位置误差为1.17 mm,平均角度误差为0.43°。紧凑的穿刺执行器减少了手术室的占地面积,简化了校准和临床工作流程。提出的设计为更安全、更可重复的微创腹部干预提供了一条实用的途径。
{"title":"Multimodal CT-ultrasound image-guided robotic system for automated abdominal puncture.","authors":"Jinhua Li, Hao Yu, Wei Jiao, Shuxi Zhang, Sheng Tian, Jianchang Zhao, Lizhi Pan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03138-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03138-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound provide complementary strengths for image-guided interventions, yet single-modality guidance cannot deliver high spatial resolution, soft-tissue contrast, and real-time feedback simultaneously. This study introduces a multimodal image-guided robotic system designed for precision abdominal puncture based on CT-ultrasound fusion, which aligns preoperative three-dimensional CT images with intraoperative two-dimensional ultrasound images. Optical tracking is adopted to extract CT slices that spatially correspond to the live ultrasound plane, and the spatial alignment between them is achieved via a mutual information algorithm. A compact three-degree-of-freedom puncture actuator is designed, involving entry-point positioning, orientation adjustment, and needle advancement. The actuator rigidly integrates a probe clamping mechanism to preserve image-actuator co-registration. Phantom validation proved anatomically consistent fused displays and reliable guidance of the proposed system, and the puncture trials targeting renal calyces yielded a mean positional error of 1.17 mm and a mean angular error of 0.43°. The compact puncture actuator reduces footprint in the operating room and simplifies the calibration and clinical workflow. The proposed design provides a practical route toward safer and more reproducible minimally invasive abdominal interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is robotic surgery ready for emergency cholecystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic approach in acute cholecystitis. 机器人手术为紧急胆囊切除术做好准备了吗?急性胆囊炎机器人手术与腹腔镜手术的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03145-7
Zohaib Jamal, Muhammad Anza Talal, Jahanzaib Saeed, Asher Siddiqui, Muhammad Ijlal Haider, Khizra Zafar, Hammad Zaidi
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute cholecystitis is typically managed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, though inflammation and distorted anatomy can increase operative difficulty. Robotic cholecystectomy may offer technical advantages through improved visualisation and instrument dexterity, yet current evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and entirely observational, with no randomized trials comparing the two approaches in the emergency setting. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesises existing comparative data to determine whether robotic assistance confers meaningful operative or postoperative benefits over standard laparoscopy in acute cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Comprehensive searches of major databases (2015-2025) identified comparative studies of robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute/emergency cholecystitis in adults. Eligible studies reported at least one perioperative or postoperative outcome; elective, paediatric, single-incision, and non-comparative designs were excluded. Outcomes included operative time, conversion, intra-operative complications, bile duct injury, length of stay, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan using random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed by I² and standard continuity corrections applied for zero-event studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven observational studies comprising 143,717 patients met the inclusion criteria. Operative time and length of stay could not be meta-analysed due to inconsistent reporting and were therefore summarised narratively, with both outcomes appearing broadly comparable between robotic and laparoscopic groups. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly lower risk of conversion to open surgery with robotic cholecystectomy (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.75; I² = 44%). No significant differences were observed between robotic and laparoscopic approaches for intra-operative complications (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.38-1.36; I² = 40%), bile duct injury (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77-1.21; I² = 0%), overall postoperative complications (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.80-1.52; I² = 95%), 30-day readmission (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.50-1.54; I² = 18%), reintervention or return to theatre (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04-2.48; I² = 78%), or 30-day mortality (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.86-1.90; I² = 0%). Event rates for bile duct injury, major complications, reintervention, and mortality were uniformly low across all cohorts, limiting the precision of pooled estimates. Risk-of-bias assessment using ROBINS-I indicated a moderate to serious overall risk of bias in six of the seven studies, primarily due to residual confounding, non-random treatment allocation, and incomplete reporting of disease severity and operative complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative to lap
急性胆囊炎通常采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗,但炎症和解剖结构扭曲会增加手术难度。机器人胆囊切除术可能通过改善视觉效果和器械灵活性提供技术优势,但目前的证据有限,异质性,完全是观察性的,没有随机试验比较两种方法在紧急情况下的应用。本系统综述和荟萃分析综合了现有的比较数据,以确定机器人辅助在急性胆囊炎手术或术后是否比标准腹腔镜手术更有意义。材料和方法:采用符合prisma标准的系统评价和荟萃分析。对主要数据库的综合检索(2015-2025)确定了机器人胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗成人急性/急诊胆囊炎的比较研究。符合条件的研究报告了至少一个围手术期或术后结果;排除了选择性、儿科、单切口和非比较性设计。结果包括手术时间、转换、术中并发症、胆管损伤、住院时间、再入院、再手术和死亡率。使用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。在RevMan中使用随机效应模型进行meta分析,异质性采用I²评估,零事件研究采用标准连续性校正。结果:包括143,717例患者的7项观察性研究符合纳入标准。由于报告不一致,无法对手术时间和住院时间进行荟萃分析,因此对其进行了叙述性总结,机器人组和腹腔镜组的结果大致相当。荟萃分析显示,转向开放手术联合机器人胆囊切除术的风险显著降低(RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.75; I²= 44%)。机器人入路与腹腔镜入路在术中并发症(RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.38-1.36; I²= 40%)、胆管损伤(RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77-1.21; I²= 0%)、总体术后并发症(RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.80-1.52; I²= 95%)、30天再入院(RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.50-1.54; I²= 18%)、再干预或返回手术室(RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04-2.48; I²= 78%)或30天死亡率(or 1.28, 95% CI 0.86-1.90; I²= 0%)方面均无显著差异。所有队列中胆管损伤、主要并发症、再干预和死亡率的发生率均较低,限制了汇总估计的准确性。使用ROBINS-I进行的偏倚风险评估显示,7项研究中有6项存在中等至严重的总体偏倚风险,主要是由于残留的混杂因素、非随机的治疗分配、疾病严重程度和手术复杂性的不完整报告。结论:机器人胆囊切除术是一种安全可行的替代腹腔镜治疗急性胆囊炎的方法,显示出转向开放手术的持续减少,术中和术后的安全性结果相当。然而,由于目前的证据仅限于临床细节不完整的异质性观察性研究,需要进行强有力的前瞻性研究,包括详细的严重程度分级、外科医生经验评估、工作流程评估和成本效益分析,以更清楚地确定其在急诊胆道手术中的作用。
{"title":"Is robotic surgery ready for emergency cholecystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic approach in acute cholecystitis.","authors":"Zohaib Jamal, Muhammad Anza Talal, Jahanzaib Saeed, Asher Siddiqui, Muhammad Ijlal Haider, Khizra Zafar, Hammad Zaidi","doi":"10.1007/s11701-026-03145-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-026-03145-7","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Acute cholecystitis is typically managed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, though inflammation and distorted anatomy can increase operative difficulty. Robotic cholecystectomy may offer technical advantages through improved visualisation and instrument dexterity, yet current evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and entirely observational, with no randomized trials comparing the two approaches in the emergency setting. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesises existing comparative data to determine whether robotic assistance confers meaningful operative or postoperative benefits over standard laparoscopy in acute cholecystitis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Materials and methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Comprehensive searches of major databases (2015-2025) identified comparative studies of robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute/emergency cholecystitis in adults. Eligible studies reported at least one perioperative or postoperative outcome; elective, paediatric, single-incision, and non-comparative designs were excluded. Outcomes included operative time, conversion, intra-operative complications, bile duct injury, length of stay, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan using random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed by I² and standard continuity corrections applied for zero-event studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Seven observational studies comprising 143,717 patients met the inclusion criteria. Operative time and length of stay could not be meta-analysed due to inconsistent reporting and were therefore summarised narratively, with both outcomes appearing broadly comparable between robotic and laparoscopic groups. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly lower risk of conversion to open surgery with robotic cholecystectomy (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.75; I² = 44%). No significant differences were observed between robotic and laparoscopic approaches for intra-operative complications (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.38-1.36; I² = 40%), bile duct injury (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77-1.21; I² = 0%), overall postoperative complications (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.80-1.52; I² = 95%), 30-day readmission (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.50-1.54; I² = 18%), reintervention or return to theatre (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04-2.48; I² = 78%), or 30-day mortality (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.86-1.90; I² = 0%). Event rates for bile duct injury, major complications, reintervention, and mortality were uniformly low across all cohorts, limiting the precision of pooled estimates. Risk-of-bias assessment using ROBINS-I indicated a moderate to serious overall risk of bias in six of the seven studies, primarily due to residual confounding, non-random treatment allocation, and incomplete reporting of disease severity and operative complexity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Robotic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative to lap","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Learning curves and outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery: A single-surgeon experience within a structured dual-console training program. 机器人结直肠手术的学习曲线和结果:在结构化双控制台培训计划中的单个外科医生经验。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03139-x
Zsolt Madarasz, Krysztof Nowakowski, Michael Leitz, Bogdan-Cornel Sturzu, Anas Baltamar, Kira Baginski, Annika Hoyer, Miljana Vladimirov, Jens Hoeppner, Fabian Nimczewski
{"title":"Learning curves and outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery: A single-surgeon experience within a structured dual-console training program.","authors":"Zsolt Madarasz, Krysztof Nowakowski, Michael Leitz, Bogdan-Cornel Sturzu, Anas Baltamar, Kira Baginski, Annika Hoyer, Miljana Vladimirov, Jens Hoeppner, Fabian Nimczewski","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03139-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-025-03139-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12791061/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: five-year comparative outcomes from a high-volume tertiary endocrine surgery center. 机器人与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:来自大容量三级内分泌外科中心的五年比较结果。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03133-3
Sezer Akbulut, Tugba Matlim Ozel, Aykut Celik, Gorkem Yildiz, Sebnem Burhan, Emrecan Deniz, Serkan Sari

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the standard minimally invasive approach, whereas robotic adrenalectomy (RA) is increasingly adopted for its ergonomic and technical advantages. Whether these benefits improve perioperative outcomes-particularly by adrenal laterality-remains unclear. This study compared RA and LA outcomes via structured side-specific analysis. A total of 198 patients were screened in this retrospective cohort study, which included adults who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy between June 2020 and September 2025. Patients with paragangliomas, recurrent disease, or open adrenalectomy were excluded. Clinical, operative, and postoperative variables were collected, and laterality-specific subgroup analyses and multivariable linear regression were performed. A total of 181 patients were analyzed (126 LA, 55 RA). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RA group (p = 0.019), whereas the operative time was significantly longer in the RA group than the LA group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between techniques regarding complications, transfusions, or conversion rates (all p > 0.05). When stratified by laterality, the RA consistently demonstrated longer operative times for both right- and left-sided procedures (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, only the surgical approach and tumor diameter independently affected the operative time (both p < 0.001). Robotic adrenalectomy demonstrated perioperative safety comparable to that of laparoscopy while providing the advantage of a shorter hospital stay despite longer operative times. Given its similar complication and conversion profiles, RA represents a feasible and ergonomically favorable procedure in endocrine surgery centers.

腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)是标准的微创手术方式,而机器人肾上腺切除术(RA)因其符合人体工程学和技术优势而越来越多地被采用。这些益处是否能改善围手术期的预后,特别是肾上腺侧边的预后,目前尚不清楚。本研究通过结构化的侧特异性分析比较了RA和LA的结果。这项回顾性队列研究共筛选了198名患者,其中包括在2020年6月至2025年9月期间接受微创肾上腺切除术的成年人。排除副神经节瘤、复发性疾病或开放性肾上腺切除术患者。收集临床、手术和术后变量,进行侧边特异性亚组分析和多变量线性回归。共有181例患者被分析(126例LA, 55例RA)。RA组住院时间明显短于LA组(p = 0.019), RA组手术时间明显长于LA组(p 0.05)。当按侧位分层时,RA始终显示右侧和左侧手术时间更长(p = 0.001和p
{"title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: five-year comparative outcomes from a high-volume tertiary endocrine surgery center.","authors":"Sezer Akbulut, Tugba Matlim Ozel, Aykut Celik, Gorkem Yildiz, Sebnem Burhan, Emrecan Deniz, Serkan Sari","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03133-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-025-03133-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the standard minimally invasive approach, whereas robotic adrenalectomy (RA) is increasingly adopted for its ergonomic and technical advantages. Whether these benefits improve perioperative outcomes-particularly by adrenal laterality-remains unclear. This study compared RA and LA outcomes via structured side-specific analysis. A total of 198 patients were screened in this retrospective cohort study, which included adults who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy between June 2020 and September 2025. Patients with paragangliomas, recurrent disease, or open adrenalectomy were excluded. Clinical, operative, and postoperative variables were collected, and laterality-specific subgroup analyses and multivariable linear regression were performed. A total of 181 patients were analyzed (126 LA, 55 RA). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RA group (p = 0.019), whereas the operative time was significantly longer in the RA group than the LA group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between techniques regarding complications, transfusions, or conversion rates (all p > 0.05). When stratified by laterality, the RA consistently demonstrated longer operative times for both right- and left-sided procedures (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, only the surgical approach and tumor diameter independently affected the operative time (both p < 0.001). Robotic adrenalectomy demonstrated perioperative safety comparable to that of laparoscopy while providing the advantage of a shorter hospital stay despite longer operative times. Given its similar complication and conversion profiles, RA represents a feasible and ergonomically favorable procedure in endocrine surgery centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145946697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Robotic Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1