首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Robotic Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
A comprehensive predictive model for postoperative joint function in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty patients: combining radiomics and clinical indicators. 机器人辅助全髋关节置换术患者术后关节功能的综合预测模型:结合放射组学和临床指标。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02102-6
Jiewen Zhang, Yiwei Zhao, Yang Chen, Heng Li, Fangze Xing, Chengyan Liu, Xudong Duan, Huanshuai Guan, Ning Kong, Yiyang Li, Kunzheng Wang, Run Tian, Pei Yang

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) effectively treats various end-stage hip conditions, offering pain relief and improved joint function. However, surgical outcomes are influenced by multifaceted factors. This research aims to create a predictive model, incorporating radiomic and clinical information, to forecast post-surgery joint function in robot-assisted THA (RA-THA) patients. The study set comprised 136 patients who underwent unilateral RA-THA, which were subsequently partitioned into a training set (n = 95) and a test set (n = 41) for analysis. Preoperative CT imaging was employed to derive 851 radiomic characteristics, selecting those with an intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.75 for analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression reduced redundancy to six significant radiomic features. Clinical data including preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were collected. Logistic regression identified significant predictors, and three models were developed. Receiver operating characteristic and decision curves evaluated the models. Preoperative VAS, HHS, WOMAC score, and radiomics feature scores were significant predictors. In the training set, the AUCs were 0.835 (clinical model), 0.757 (radiomic model), and 0.891 (combined model). In the test set, the AUCs were 0.777 (clinical model), 0.824 (radiomic model), and 0.881 (combined model). The constructed nomogram prediction model combines radiological features with relevant clinical data to accurately predict functional outcomes 3 years after RA-THA. This model has significant prediction accuracy and broad clinical application prospects and can provide a valuable reference for formulating personalized treatment plans and optimizing patient management strategies.

全髋关节置换术(THA)可有效治疗各种终末期髋关节疾病,缓解疼痛并改善关节功能。然而,手术效果受到多方面因素的影响。本研究旨在建立一个预测模型,结合放射学和临床信息,预测机器人辅助髋关节置换术(RA-THA)患者的术后关节功能。研究对象包括136名接受单侧RA-THA手术的患者,随后将其分为训练集(95人)和测试集(41人)进行分析。利用术前 CT 成像得出 851 个放射学特征,选择类内相关系数大于 0.75 的特征进行分析。最小绝对缩减和选择算子回归将冗余减少到六个重要的放射学特征。临床数据包括术前视觉模拟量表(VAS)、哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS)以及西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)。逻辑回归确定了重要的预测因素,并建立了三个模型。接收者操作特征曲线和决策曲线对模型进行了评估。术前VAS、HHS、WOMAC评分和放射组学特征评分是重要的预测因素。在训练集中,AUC 分别为 0.835(临床模型)、0.757(放射组学模型)和 0.891(组合模型)。在测试集中,AUC 分别为 0.777(临床模型)、0.824(放射线组模型)和 0.881(组合模型)。所构建的提名图预测模型结合了放射学特征和相关临床数据,能准确预测 RA-THA 术后 3 年的功能预后。该模型具有明显的预测准确性和广阔的临床应用前景,可为制定个性化治疗方案和优化患者管理策略提供有价值的参考。
{"title":"A comprehensive predictive model for postoperative joint function in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty patients: combining radiomics and clinical indicators.","authors":"Jiewen Zhang, Yiwei Zhao, Yang Chen, Heng Li, Fangze Xing, Chengyan Liu, Xudong Duan, Huanshuai Guan, Ning Kong, Yiyang Li, Kunzheng Wang, Run Tian, Pei Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02102-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-024-02102-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) effectively treats various end-stage hip conditions, offering pain relief and improved joint function. However, surgical outcomes are influenced by multifaceted factors. This research aims to create a predictive model, incorporating radiomic and clinical information, to forecast post-surgery joint function in robot-assisted THA (RA-THA) patients. The study set comprised 136 patients who underwent unilateral RA-THA, which were subsequently partitioned into a training set (n = 95) and a test set (n = 41) for analysis. Preoperative CT imaging was employed to derive 851 radiomic characteristics, selecting those with an intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.75 for analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression reduced redundancy to six significant radiomic features. Clinical data including preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were collected. Logistic regression identified significant predictors, and three models were developed. Receiver operating characteristic and decision curves evaluated the models. Preoperative VAS, HHS, WOMAC score, and radiomics feature scores were significant predictors. In the training set, the AUCs were 0.835 (clinical model), 0.757 (radiomic model), and 0.891 (combined model). In the test set, the AUCs were 0.777 (clinical model), 0.824 (radiomic model), and 0.881 (combined model). The constructed nomogram prediction model combines radiological features with relevant clinical data to accurately predict functional outcomes 3 years after RA-THA. This model has significant prediction accuracy and broad clinical application prospects and can provide a valuable reference for formulating personalized treatment plans and optimizing patient management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis of the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy using the DaVinci vs the Hugo RAS surgical platforms. 使用达芬奇与雨果RAS手术平台进行机器人根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期和肿瘤治疗效果的综合评估和荟萃分析。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02107-1
Anneng Hu, Zongying Lv, Guiyuan Chen, Yuhang Lin, Xiaole Zhu, Junyang Li, Xiaodong Yu

Because of the increasing popularity of Hugo RAS as a surgical platform, a comparison examination of intraoperative and oncological outcomes across DaVinci and Hugo RAS robotic surgery platforms is urgently needed. We carried out a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature of current research, comprehensively searching PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for eligible studies comparing the results between the DaVinci and Hugo RAS. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria were followed in the conduct of this study, with language restricted to English and a final search date of June 2024. We excluded articles composed solely of conference abstracts and irrelevant content. Composite outcomes were assessed using weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (ORs). The risk of bias in individual research was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and heterogeneity and bias risk were controlled for using a sensitivity analysis. Six studies in all were considered, comprising 1025 patients, including 626 DaVinci patients and 399 Hugo RAS patients. Review Manager V5.4.1 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was utilized to conduct the meta-analysis, including 6 trials, which demonstrated that compared to Hugo RAS, DaVinci was associated with statistically significant differences in several outcomes: a reduction in operative time (OT) (WMD - 8.46, 95% CI - 13.56 to 3.36; p = 0.001), an increase in estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD 41.68, 95% CI 23.59 to 59.77; p < 0.00001), and an increased pelvic lymphadenectomy ratio (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.05-2.05; p = 0.01). On the contrary, there were no statistically noteworthy differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS) between the two teams (WMD - 0.05, 95% CI - 0.14 to 0.04; p = 0.25), nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68-1.35; p = 0.8), postoperative complications (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.50-2.64; p = 0.75), or positive surgical margins (PSM) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.76-1.54; p = 0.68). Although DaVinci offers shorter operating times (OT) and increased pelvic lymph node dissection rates, Hugo RAS demonstrates lower estimated blood loss (EBL). Overall, Hugo RAS Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) results seem to be similar to those obtained with the DaVinci system. Further research and long-term follow-up are necessary to ascertain durable oncological and functional outcomes, allowing doctors to switch between robotic systems and use their skills. These findings are crucial for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers and warrant future studies with extended follow-up.

由于Hugo RAS作为一种手术平台越来越受欢迎,因此迫切需要对DaVinci和Hugo RAS机器人手术平台的术中和肿瘤结果进行比较研究。我们对目前的研究文献进行了全面的回顾和荟萃分析,在PubMed、Cochrane和Embase上全面搜索了符合条件的研究,比较了DaVinci和Hugo RAS的结果。本研究遵循系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准,语言限于英语,最终搜索日期为 2024 年 6 月。我们排除了仅由会议摘要和无关内容组成的文章。综合结果采用加权平均差(WMD)和几率比(OR)进行评估。个别研究的偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估,异质性和偏倚风险采用敏感性分析进行控制。共审议了六项研究,涉及 1025 名患者,其中包括 626 名 DaVinci 患者和 399 名 Hugo RAS 患者。利用Review Manager V5.4.1软件(Cochrane Collaboration,牛津,英国)进行了荟萃分析,包括6项试验,结果表明,与Hugo RAS相比,DaVinci与以下几项结果的差异具有统计学意义:手术时间(OT)缩短(WMD - 8.46,95% CI - 13.56 - 3.36;P = 0.001),估计失血量(EBL)增加(WMD 41.68,95% CI 23.59 - 59.77;P = 0.001)。
{"title":"A comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis of the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy using the DaVinci vs the Hugo RAS surgical platforms.","authors":"Anneng Hu, Zongying Lv, Guiyuan Chen, Yuhang Lin, Xiaole Zhu, Junyang Li, Xiaodong Yu","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02107-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-024-02107-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of the increasing popularity of Hugo RAS as a surgical platform, a comparison examination of intraoperative and oncological outcomes across DaVinci and Hugo RAS robotic surgery platforms is urgently needed. We carried out a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature of current research, comprehensively searching PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for eligible studies comparing the results between the DaVinci and Hugo RAS. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria were followed in the conduct of this study, with language restricted to English and a final search date of June 2024. We excluded articles composed solely of conference abstracts and irrelevant content. Composite outcomes were assessed using weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (ORs). The risk of bias in individual research was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and heterogeneity and bias risk were controlled for using a sensitivity analysis. Six studies in all were considered, comprising 1025 patients, including 626 DaVinci patients and 399 Hugo RAS patients. Review Manager V5.4.1 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was utilized to conduct the meta-analysis, including 6 trials, which demonstrated that compared to Hugo RAS, DaVinci was associated with statistically significant differences in several outcomes: a reduction in operative time (OT) (WMD - 8.46, 95% CI - 13.56 to 3.36; p = 0.001), an increase in estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD 41.68, 95% CI 23.59 to 59.77; p < 0.00001), and an increased pelvic lymphadenectomy ratio (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.05-2.05; p = 0.01). On the contrary, there were no statistically noteworthy differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS) between the two teams (WMD - 0.05, 95% CI - 0.14 to 0.04; p = 0.25), nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68-1.35; p = 0.8), postoperative complications (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.50-2.64; p = 0.75), or positive surgical margins (PSM) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.76-1.54; p = 0.68). Although DaVinci offers shorter operating times (OT) and increased pelvic lymph node dissection rates, Hugo RAS demonstrates lower estimated blood loss (EBL). Overall, Hugo RAS Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) results seem to be similar to those obtained with the DaVinci system. Further research and long-term follow-up are necessary to ascertain durable oncological and functional outcomes, allowing doctors to switch between robotic systems and use their skills. These findings are crucial for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers and warrant future studies with extended follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of postoperative pain in robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective cohort study. 机器人和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术术后疼痛的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02105-3
Ya-Chu Wu, Mun-Kung Hong, Dah-Ching Ding

Gynecologic surgery with minimally invasive method using robotic or laparoscopic techniques has gained popularity for reducing perioperative discomfort and length of hospital stay. However, the debate over postoperative pain superiority between traditional laparoscopy and robotic surgery persist. This study compared the postoperative pain of patients within 24 h of robotic (RM) and laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). This retrospective cohort study included 24 and 53 patients who underwent RM and LM, respectively, between January 2019 and July 2023. The primary outcomes were the postoperative pain levels of patients within 24 h and the use and dosage of postoperative analgesia. Additional perioperative analgesia, including long-acting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Dynastat) and abdominal nerve block, was also recorded. The secondary outcomes were blood loss and hospitalization duration. The patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Factors that could potentially increase pain, such as the number of ports (p < 0.0001), additional procedures (p = 0.0195), operative time (p < 0.0001), number of myomas (p = 0.0057), and the largest myoma size (p = 0.0086), were significantly higher in the RM group than in the LM group. However, there were no significantly different in the postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, use and dosage of ketorolac and opioid, and use of Dynastat and nerve block between the groups. Hospitalization duration and intraoperative blood loss were similar between the groups. RM and LM offer comparable postoperative pain outcomes, emphasizing the importance of patient-specific factors in decision-making regarding myomectomy techniques.

使用机器人或腹腔镜技术的微创妇科手术因能减少围手术期的不适感和住院时间而广受欢迎。然而,关于传统腹腔镜手术和机器人手术的术后疼痛优劣的争论依然存在。本研究比较了机器人(RM)和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(LM)患者术后24小时内的疼痛情况。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年1月至2023年7月期间分别接受机器人子宫肌瘤剔除术和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的24名和53名患者。主要结果是患者术后24小时内的疼痛程度以及术后镇痛的使用情况和剂量。此外,还记录了围手术期的其他镇痛措施,包括长效非甾体抗炎药(Dynastat)和腹部神经阻滞。次要结果是失血量和住院时间。两组患者的特征相似。可能会增加疼痛的因素,如插孔数量(p
{"title":"Comparison of postoperative pain in robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ya-Chu Wu, Mun-Kung Hong, Dah-Ching Ding","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02105-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02105-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gynecologic surgery with minimally invasive method using robotic or laparoscopic techniques has gained popularity for reducing perioperative discomfort and length of hospital stay. However, the debate over postoperative pain superiority between traditional laparoscopy and robotic surgery persist. This study compared the postoperative pain of patients within 24 h of robotic (RM) and laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). This retrospective cohort study included 24 and 53 patients who underwent RM and LM, respectively, between January 2019 and July 2023. The primary outcomes were the postoperative pain levels of patients within 24 h and the use and dosage of postoperative analgesia. Additional perioperative analgesia, including long-acting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Dynastat) and abdominal nerve block, was also recorded. The secondary outcomes were blood loss and hospitalization duration. The patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Factors that could potentially increase pain, such as the number of ports (p < 0.0001), additional procedures (p = 0.0195), operative time (p < 0.0001), number of myomas (p = 0.0057), and the largest myoma size (p = 0.0086), were significantly higher in the RM group than in the LM group. However, there were no significantly different in the postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, use and dosage of ketorolac and opioid, and use of Dynastat and nerve block between the groups. Hospitalization duration and intraoperative blood loss were similar between the groups. RM and LM offer comparable postoperative pain outcomes, emphasizing the importance of patient-specific factors in decision-making regarding myomectomy techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to: Comparison of the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional robotic colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching study. 更正:机器人自然腔道标本提取手术与传统机器人结直肠癌切除术的安全性和有效性比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02082-7
Yongpan Huang, Nanhui Yu
{"title":"Correction to: Comparison of the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional robotic colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching study.","authors":"Yongpan Huang, Nanhui Yu","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02082-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02082-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perioperative and functional outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: evidence-based on controlled studies. 单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期和功能结果:基于对照研究的证据。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02094-3
Li Wang, Si-Yu Chen, Jian-Wei Yang, Kun-Peng Li, Shun Wan, Xiao-Ran Li, Li Yang

To compare perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using a single-port (SP) or multi-port (MP) robotic platform. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases until June 2024. For a combined analysis of the data using random effects, Review Manager 5.4 was employed. To compare continuous and categorical variables, the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were employed, respectively. Three original studies were included, comprising a total of 170 patients (SP-RARC: 73 versus MP-RARC: 93).Recovery of bowel function was faster in SP-RARC (WMD -1.02 days, 95% CI - 1.33 to - 0.17; p < 0.001), and lymph-node yield was lower than in MP-RARC patients (WMD - 6.32, 95% CI - 8.90 to - 3.75; p < 0.00001).There were no significant differences between the SP-RARC and MP-RARC groups in terms of other perioperative outcomes such as surgery duration, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, major complication rate, positive surgical margin rate, readmission rate, and recurrence rate. The SP robot offers a safe alternative surgical approach to RARC, providing similar postoperative outcomes compared to the MP robot. The SP system remains an attractive option that will require longer follow-up and cohort validation in the future.

目的:比较使用单孔(SP)或多孔(MP)机器人平台进行机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)的围手术期效果。我们对PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Google Scholar数据库进行了全面检索,检索期至2024年6月。为了使用随机效应对数据进行综合分析,我们使用了 Review Manager 5.4。在比较连续变量和分类变量时,分别采用了加权平均差(WMD)和几率比(OR)。三项原始研究共纳入 170 名患者(SP-RARC:73 对 MP-RARC:93)。
{"title":"Perioperative and functional outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: evidence-based on controlled studies.","authors":"Li Wang, Si-Yu Chen, Jian-Wei Yang, Kun-Peng Li, Shun Wan, Xiao-Ran Li, Li Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02094-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-024-02094-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using a single-port (SP) or multi-port (MP) robotic platform. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases until June 2024. For a combined analysis of the data using random effects, Review Manager 5.4 was employed. To compare continuous and categorical variables, the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were employed, respectively. Three original studies were included, comprising a total of 170 patients (SP-RARC: 73 versus MP-RARC: 93).Recovery of bowel function was faster in SP-RARC (WMD -1.02 days, 95% CI - 1.33 to - 0.17; p < 0.001), and lymph-node yield was lower than in MP-RARC patients (WMD - 6.32, 95% CI - 8.90 to - 3.75; p < 0.00001).There were no significant differences between the SP-RARC and MP-RARC groups in terms of other perioperative outcomes such as surgery duration, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, major complication rate, positive surgical margin rate, readmission rate, and recurrence rate. The SP robot offers a safe alternative surgical approach to RARC, providing similar postoperative outcomes compared to the MP robot. The SP system remains an attractive option that will require longer follow-up and cohort validation in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IMRA/SRS Delphi consensus on international standards for common core components of robotic surgical training design. IMRA/SRS 就机器人手术培训设计共同核心内容的国际标准达成德尔菲共识。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02057-8
Jessica Wynn, Anthony Costello, Kirsten Larkins, Daniel Costello, Ahmed Ghazi, Kieran Ryan, Kevin Barry, Matthew Gray, Anthony Gallagher, Andrew Hung, Alexander Heriot, Satish Warrier, Farleigh Reeves, Justin Collins, Phil Dundee, Justin Peters, David Homewood, Dean Driscoll, Owen Niall, Tayla Fay, Ajit Sachdeva, Henry Woo, Richard Satava, Helen Mohan

Robotic surgery has expanded internationally at pace. There are multiple local robotic training pathways but there is inconsistency in standardisation of core common components for curricula internationally. A framework is required to define key objectives that can be implemented across robotic training ecosystems. This Delphi consensus aimed to provide recommendations for core considerations in robotic training design across diverse training environments internationally. A literature search was performed and an international steering committee (AG, KL, JW, HM, TC) proposed key components for contemporary robotic training design and a modified Delphi approach was used to gather stakeholder opinion. The outcomes were then discussed at a face-to-face international expert consensus at the IMRA educational session at the Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS) meeting and final voting was conducted on outstanding items. Stakeholders included robotic surgeons, proctors, trainees and robotic surgical training providers. There was consensus achieved in 139 statements organised into 15 themes. There was 100% agreement that standardised themes in robotic curricula may improve patient safety. Key take-home messages include-training curricula should be multiplatform, non-technical skills are an important component of a robotic curriculum as well as console and bedside skills, clinically relevant performance metrics should be used for assessment where available, the reliance on cadaveric and live animal models should be reduced as high-fidelity synthetic models emerge, and stepwise component training is useful for advanced procedural training. These consensus recommendations are intended to guide design of fit for purpose contemporary robotic surgical curricula. Integration of these components into robotic training pathways internationally is recommended.

机器人手术在国际上迅速发展。当地有多种机器人培训途径,但国际课程的核心共同组成部分的标准化并不一致。我们需要一个框架来定义可在机器人培训生态系统中实施的关键目标。本德尔菲共识旨在为国际上不同培训环境中机器人培训设计的核心考虑因素提供建议。我们进行了文献检索,并由一个国际指导委员会(AG、KL、JW、HM、TC)提出了当代机器人训练设计的关键要素,并采用改良德尔菲法收集利益相关者的意见。随后,在机器人外科学会 (SRS) 会议的 IMRA 教育会议上,国际专家面对面讨论了讨论结果,并对未决项目进行了最终投票。利益相关者包括机器人外科医生、监查员、学员和机器人手术培训机构。会议就 15 个主题下的 139 项声明达成了共识。100%的与会者一致认为,机器人课程中的标准化主题可提高患者安全。获得的主要信息包括:培训课程应该是多平台的;非技术性技能是机器人课程的重要组成部分,控制台和床边技能也是如此;在有条件的情况下,应该使用与临床相关的性能指标进行评估;随着高保真合成模型的出现,应该减少对尸体和活体动物模型的依赖;分步式组件培训对高级程序培训很有用。这些共识建议旨在指导当代机器人手术课程的设计。建议国际社会将这些内容纳入机器人培训途径。
{"title":"IMRA/SRS Delphi consensus on international standards for common core components of robotic surgical training design.","authors":"Jessica Wynn, Anthony Costello, Kirsten Larkins, Daniel Costello, Ahmed Ghazi, Kieran Ryan, Kevin Barry, Matthew Gray, Anthony Gallagher, Andrew Hung, Alexander Heriot, Satish Warrier, Farleigh Reeves, Justin Collins, Phil Dundee, Justin Peters, David Homewood, Dean Driscoll, Owen Niall, Tayla Fay, Ajit Sachdeva, Henry Woo, Richard Satava, Helen Mohan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02057-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02057-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic surgery has expanded internationally at pace. There are multiple local robotic training pathways but there is inconsistency in standardisation of core common components for curricula internationally. A framework is required to define key objectives that can be implemented across robotic training ecosystems. This Delphi consensus aimed to provide recommendations for core considerations in robotic training design across diverse training environments internationally. A literature search was performed and an international steering committee (AG, KL, JW, HM, TC) proposed key components for contemporary robotic training design and a modified Delphi approach was used to gather stakeholder opinion. The outcomes were then discussed at a face-to-face international expert consensus at the IMRA educational session at the Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS) meeting and final voting was conducted on outstanding items. Stakeholders included robotic surgeons, proctors, trainees and robotic surgical training providers. There was consensus achieved in 139 statements organised into 15 themes. There was 100% agreement that standardised themes in robotic curricula may improve patient safety. Key take-home messages include-training curricula should be multiplatform, non-technical skills are an important component of a robotic curriculum as well as console and bedside skills, clinically relevant performance metrics should be used for assessment where available, the reliance on cadaveric and live animal models should be reduced as high-fidelity synthetic models emerge, and stepwise component training is useful for advanced procedural training. These consensus recommendations are intended to guide design of fit for purpose contemporary robotic surgical curricula. Integration of these components into robotic training pathways internationally is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413123/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oncologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an ACS-NSQIP analysis. 结肠癌机器人与腹腔镜结肠切除术的肿瘤治疗效果:ACS-NSQIP 分析。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02097-0
Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite, Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Gustavo Yano Callado, Hannah Bossie, Rocco Ricciardi

Robotic colectomy has been associated with comparable or improved short-term morbidity and mortality when compared to laparoscopic colectomy, including shorter length of stay. In this study, we sought to understand oncologic advantages for robotic as compared to laparoscopic colectomy in colon cancer. We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant user files for all elective colon cancer cases from 1/2016 through 12/2021 performed with minimally invasive surgical techniques (robotic and laparoscopic). We calculated relative risks (RR) through Poisson Regression models and treatment effect coefficients by propensity-score match, after adjusting for age, BMI, ASA scores, mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation, emergency surgery, race, gender, smoking status, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Analyzed outcomes included rate of chemotherapy initiation within 90 days of surgery, number of harvested lymph nodes, any occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, and the need for ostomy. During the study period, 44,745 patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy for colon cancer; 39,614 in the laparoscopic cohort and 7,831 in the robotic cohort. After adjusting for confounders, robotic colectomy was associated with a significant increase in the likelihood for initating chemotherapy within 90 days (RR 1.98, 95% CI {1.86-2.10}, p < 0.001). The robotic-treated patients had a significantly more lymph nodes harvested, a significant decrease in the need for intraperative or postoperative blood transfusion (RR 0.64, 95% CI {0.57-0.71}, p < 0.001) and a significant reduction in the need for ostomy formation (RR 0.26, 95% CI {0.22-0.30}, p < 0.001). As a retrospective and non-randomized study, residual bias and confouding variables are likely to exist. The study is also subject to coding incompleteness and inaccuracies. We also do not have additional context on potential factors that might influence time to chemotherapy. In addition, there is no information on surgeon or hospital volume, which can be associated with outcomes. Robotic colectomy for colon cancer was associated with significant improvement in the rate of chemotherapy initiation within 90 days, a significant reduction in need for blood transfusions, and a lower likelihood of receiving an ostomy when compared to laparoscopic colectomy procedures. The data reveal substantial short-term gains in oncologic outcomes for colon cancer performed with robotic techniques.

与腹腔镜结肠切除术相比,机器人结肠切除术的短期发病率和死亡率相当或有所提高,包括住院时间更短。在这项研究中,我们试图了解结肠癌机器人结肠切除术与腹腔镜结肠切除术相比在肿瘤学方面的优势。我们分析了美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)参与者的用户档案,其中包括从 2016 年 1 月 1 日到 2021 年 12 月 12 日使用微创手术技术(机器人和腹腔镜)进行的所有选择性结肠癌病例。在对年龄、体重指数、ASA 评分、机械和抗生素肠道准备、急诊手术、种族、性别、吸烟状况、高血压和糖尿病进行调整后,我们通过泊松回归模型计算相对风险 (RR),并通过倾向分数匹配计算治疗效果系数。分析的结果包括术后90天内开始化疗的比例、摘取淋巴结的数量、术中或术后输血的发生率以及造口的需求。在研究期间,44,745 名患者接受了结肠癌微创结肠切除术;其中腹腔镜组有 39,614 人,机器人组有 7,831 人。在对混杂因素进行调整后,机器人结肠切除术与 90 天内开始化疗的可能性显著增加有关(RR 1.98,95% CI {1.86-2.10},p<0.05)。
{"title":"Oncologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.","authors":"Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite, Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Gustavo Yano Callado, Hannah Bossie, Rocco Ricciardi","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02097-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02097-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic colectomy has been associated with comparable or improved short-term morbidity and mortality when compared to laparoscopic colectomy, including shorter length of stay. In this study, we sought to understand oncologic advantages for robotic as compared to laparoscopic colectomy in colon cancer. We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant user files for all elective colon cancer cases from 1/2016 through 12/2021 performed with minimally invasive surgical techniques (robotic and laparoscopic). We calculated relative risks (RR) through Poisson Regression models and treatment effect coefficients by propensity-score match, after adjusting for age, BMI, ASA scores, mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation, emergency surgery, race, gender, smoking status, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Analyzed outcomes included rate of chemotherapy initiation within 90 days of surgery, number of harvested lymph nodes, any occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, and the need for ostomy. During the study period, 44,745 patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy for colon cancer; 39,614 in the laparoscopic cohort and 7,831 in the robotic cohort. After adjusting for confounders, robotic colectomy was associated with a significant increase in the likelihood for initating chemotherapy within 90 days (RR 1.98, 95% CI {1.86-2.10}, p < 0.001). The robotic-treated patients had a significantly more lymph nodes harvested, a significant decrease in the need for intraperative or postoperative blood transfusion (RR 0.64, 95% CI {0.57-0.71}, p < 0.001) and a significant reduction in the need for ostomy formation (RR 0.26, 95% CI {0.22-0.30}, p < 0.001). As a retrospective and non-randomized study, residual bias and confouding variables are likely to exist. The study is also subject to coding incompleteness and inaccuracies. We also do not have additional context on potential factors that might influence time to chemotherapy. In addition, there is no information on surgeon or hospital volume, which can be associated with outcomes. Robotic colectomy for colon cancer was associated with significant improvement in the rate of chemotherapy initiation within 90 days, a significant reduction in need for blood transfusions, and a lower likelihood of receiving an ostomy when compared to laparoscopic colectomy procedures. The data reveal substantial short-term gains in oncologic outcomes for colon cancer performed with robotic techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: "Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with prosthesis breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a meta-analysis". 评论"乳腺癌微创与传统保留乳头乳房切除术加假体乳房重建术的术后效果:荟萃分析"。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02092-5
Xiaosong Li, Xiping Shen, Hua Lu, Hang Li
{"title":"Comment on: \"Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with prosthesis breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a meta-analysis\".","authors":"Xiaosong Li, Xiping Shen, Hua Lu, Hang Li","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02092-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-024-02092-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collaborative robot acting as scrub nurse for cataract surgery (CRASCS). 协作机器人充当白内障手术的擦洗护士(CRASCS)。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02089-0
D Rekha, Harish Kumar Kaliyappan

Worldwide, healthcare systems are struggling to tackle a nursing shortage. As per the data released by the American Hospital Association, the healthcare workforce could face a loss of around 5 lakh nurses by the end of the year. Consequently, it could result in those deficiencies, which will be 1.1 million instead of 0.6 million. The current nursing scenario in India as per the Indian Nursing Council (INC), which is a board under the ministry and is responsible for legally confirming and maintaining universal standardized training for nursing, is that the 1.96 nurses out of every 1000 Indians that are there are much behind the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended figure of 3 nurses per 1000. To mitigate the nurse shortage, a collaborative robotic system was designed that can assist with surgical procedures with a collaborative robot acting as a scrub nurse for cataract surgery (CRASCS) represented in Fig. 1. Accordingly, the model has been built to empower a customized 3d printed 5-Degree of freedom robotic arm by tracking the phase of surgery in real-time and automatically supplying the clinician with the ideal equipment that is needed for the particular phase of surgery. The system is supported with one more model which can identify where the surgical equipment is located within the arm range. The system is also supported with voice commands which help in picking up the right surgical equipment in the middle of any phase of the surgery. In this way, the system could be able to potentially handle the shortage of surgical nurses around the world and benefit humanity.

全世界的医疗系统都在努力解决护士短缺的问题。根据美国医院协会公布的数据,到今年年底,医疗保健队伍可能面临约 50 万名护士的流失。因此,这将导致护士缺口从 60 万增加到 110 万。印度护理委员会(INC)是印度护理部下属的一个委员会,负责依法确认和维持普遍的标准化护理培训,根据该委员会的数据,印度目前的护理状况是,每 1000 名印度人中只有 1.96 名护士,远远落后于世界卫生组织(WHO)建议的每 1000 人中有 3 名护士的数字。为了缓解护士短缺的问题,我们设计了一个协作机器人系统,该系统可以协助外科手术,协作机器人充当白内障手术的擦洗护士(CRASCS),如图 1 所示。因此,该模型通过实时跟踪手术阶段,自动为临床医生提供特定手术阶段所需的理想设备,从而为定制的 3d 打印 5 自由度机械臂赋能。该系统还配有一个模型,可识别手术设备在机械臂范围内的位置。该系统还支持语音指令,有助于在手术的任何阶段提取正确的手术设备。这样,该系统就有可能解决全球外科护士短缺的问题,造福人类。
{"title":"Collaborative robot acting as scrub nurse for cataract surgery (CRASCS).","authors":"D Rekha, Harish Kumar Kaliyappan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02089-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02089-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Worldwide, healthcare systems are struggling to tackle a nursing shortage. As per the data released by the American Hospital Association, the healthcare workforce could face a loss of around 5 lakh nurses by the end of the year. Consequently, it could result in those deficiencies, which will be 1.1 million instead of 0.6 million. The current nursing scenario in India as per the Indian Nursing Council (INC), which is a board under the ministry and is responsible for legally confirming and maintaining universal standardized training for nursing, is that the 1.96 nurses out of every 1000 Indians that are there are much behind the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended figure of 3 nurses per 1000. To mitigate the nurse shortage, a collaborative robotic system was designed that can assist with surgical procedures with a collaborative robot acting as a scrub nurse for cataract surgery (CRASCS) represented in Fig. 1. Accordingly, the model has been built to empower a customized 3d printed 5-Degree of freedom robotic arm by tracking the phase of surgery in real-time and automatically supplying the clinician with the ideal equipment that is needed for the particular phase of surgery. The system is supported with one more model which can identify where the surgical equipment is located within the arm range. The system is also supported with voice commands which help in picking up the right surgical equipment in the middle of any phase of the surgery. In this way, the system could be able to potentially handle the shortage of surgical nurses around the world and benefit humanity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advantages of robotic surgery for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopic surgery: pelvic anatomy and its impact on urinary dysfunction. 直肠癌机器人手术与腹腔镜手术相比的优势:骨盆解剖及其对排尿功能障碍的影响。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02095-2
Yusuke Takashima, Hiroki Shimizu, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Tomohiro Arita, Jun Kiuchi, Ryo Morimura, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hisashi Ikoma, Takeshi Kubota, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji

The anatomical dimensions and the shape of the pelvis influence surgical difficulty for rectal cancer. Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted surgery is expected to improve surgical outcomes due to the multi-joint movement of its surgical instruments. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pelvic anatomical indicators on short-term outcomes of patients with rectal cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 129 patients with rectal cancer who underwent conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR) or robot-assisted low anterior resection (R-LAR) with total mesorectal excision or tumor-specific mesorectal excision between January 2014 and December 2022. The transverse diameter of the lesser pelvis and the sacral promontory angle were used as indicators of pelvic anatomy. The sacral promontory angle was not associated with age and sex while the pelvic width was smaller in male than in female. The pelvic width did not affect postoperative complications in both L-LAR and R-LAR. In contrast, postoperative urinary dysfunction occurred more frequently in patients with a small sacral promontory angle (p = 0.005) in L-LAR although there was no impact on short-term outcomes in R-LAR. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a small sacral promontory angle was an independent predictive factor for urinary dysfunction (p = 0.032). Sharp angulation of the sacral promontory was a risk factor for UD after L-LAR. Robot-assisted surgery could overcome anatomical difficulties and reduce the incidence of UD.

骨盆的解剖尺寸和形状会影响直肠癌的手术难度。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助手术由于其手术器械的多关节运动,有望改善手术效果。本研究旨在探讨骨盆解剖指标对直肠癌患者短期疗效的影响。研究使用2014年1月至2022年12月期间接受传统腹腔镜低位前切除术(L-LAR)或机器人辅助低位前切除术(R-LAR)并进行全直肠系膜切除术或肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术的129例直肠癌患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。小骨盆横径和骶骨前角被用作骨盆解剖学指标。骶骨前角与年龄和性别无关,而男性骨盆宽度小于女性。骨盆宽度对 L-LAR 和 R-LAR 的术后并发症均无影响。相反,在L-LAR手术中,骶骨前角小的患者术后出现排尿功能障碍的频率更高(p = 0.005),而在R-LAR手术中,骶骨前角小的患者术后出现排尿功能障碍的频率更高(p = 0.005),但对短期预后没有影响。多变量分析表明,骶骨前角小是排尿功能障碍的独立预测因素(p = 0.032)。骶骨前突的锐角是L-LAR术后排尿功能障碍的风险因素。机器人辅助手术可以克服解剖上的困难,降低尿失禁的发生率。
{"title":"Advantages of robotic surgery for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopic surgery: pelvic anatomy and its impact on urinary dysfunction.","authors":"Yusuke Takashima, Hiroki Shimizu, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Tomohiro Arita, Jun Kiuchi, Ryo Morimura, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hisashi Ikoma, Takeshi Kubota, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02095-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02095-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The anatomical dimensions and the shape of the pelvis influence surgical difficulty for rectal cancer. Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted surgery is expected to improve surgical outcomes due to the multi-joint movement of its surgical instruments. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pelvic anatomical indicators on short-term outcomes of patients with rectal cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 129 patients with rectal cancer who underwent conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR) or robot-assisted low anterior resection (R-LAR) with total mesorectal excision or tumor-specific mesorectal excision between January 2014 and December 2022. The transverse diameter of the lesser pelvis and the sacral promontory angle were used as indicators of pelvic anatomy. The sacral promontory angle was not associated with age and sex while the pelvic width was smaller in male than in female. The pelvic width did not affect postoperative complications in both L-LAR and R-LAR. In contrast, postoperative urinary dysfunction occurred more frequently in patients with a small sacral promontory angle (p = 0.005) in L-LAR although there was no impact on short-term outcomes in R-LAR. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a small sacral promontory angle was an independent predictive factor for urinary dysfunction (p = 0.032). Sharp angulation of the sacral promontory was a risk factor for UD after L-LAR. Robot-assisted surgery could overcome anatomical difficulties and reduce the incidence of UD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Robotic Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1