首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Robotic Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Validation of the deep pelvis endometriosis index (dPEI) to evaluate surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery for endometriosis. 深骨盆子宫内膜异位症指数(dPEI)评估机器人辅助子宫内膜异位症手术效果的验证。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03141-x
Adèle Reilhac, Shiwa Mansournia, Yohann Dabi, Clément Ferrier, Marie Florin, Meryl Dahan, Cyril Touboul, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Emile Daraï

The Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Index (dPEI) is a preoperative MRI-based score initially validated to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic treatment for deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE). Its applicability in robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) has not yet been established. This study aimed to evaluate whether the dPEI can predict surgical outcomes following RAL for DPE. From February 2019 to December 2024, a retrospective analysis from a prospective database including patients undergoing RAL for DPE at Tenon Hospital, Paris, was performed. Preoperative staging was based on MRI and the dPEI scoring system, which evaluates the involvement of different anatomical compartments by deep endometriosis. Patients were classified into three categories: mild endometriosis (dPEI ≤ 2), moderate endometriosis (dPEI 3-4), and severe endometriosis (dPEI ≥ 5). Surgical outcomes including operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification and voiding dysfunction were assessed. A hundred and seventy patients were included. Overall complication rate was 24.7%, including 7.7% Clavien-Dindo grade > II. De novo voiding dysfunction occurred in 10.6% of patients, lasting > 1 month in 4.1%. dPEI categories showed a positive correlation with longer operative time (Spearman's ρ = 0.40, p < 0.001) and increased hospital stay (Spearman's ρ = 0.43, p < 0.001) and were also significantly associated with higher rates of grade > II complications (OR = 13.1; 95% CI [1.54-111.3], p = 0.02) and high incidence of voiding dysfunction (OR = 5.9; 95% CI [1.48-23.5], p = 0.01). Involvement of lateral compartments was associated with high operative time, hospital stay, and de novo voiding dysfunction. Our results support the dPEI as a useful preoperative tool for predicting surgical outcomes after RAL for DPE. Its use can improve patient counseling, and shared decision-making, particularly in cases of severe disease (dPEI ≥ 5).

深盆腔子宫内膜异位症指数(dPEI)是一种术前基于mri的评分,最初用于预测接受腹腔镜治疗的深盆腔子宫内膜异位症(DPE)患者的手术结果。其在机器人辅助腹腔镜(RAL)中的适用性尚未确定。本研究旨在评估dPEI是否可以预测DPE RAL术后的手术结果。从2019年2月至2024年12月,对包括在巴黎Tenon医院接受RAL治疗DPE的患者在内的前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。术前分期基于MRI和dPEI评分系统,该评分系统评估深部子宫内膜异位症累及不同解剖腔室。将患者分为轻度子宫内膜异位症(dPEI≤2)、中度子宫内膜异位症(dPEI 3-4)和重度子宫内膜异位症(dPEI≥5)三类。评估手术结果,包括手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo分类)和排尿功能障碍。共纳入170名患者。总并发症发生率为24.7%,其中Clavien-Dindo分级> II级为7.7%。10.6%的患者出现新发排尿功能障碍,4.1%的患者持续1 ~ 10个月。dPEI类型与手术时间较长(Spearman's ρ = 0.40, p II并发症(OR = 13.1; 95% CI [1.54-111.3], p = 0.02)和排尿功能障碍高发(OR = 5.9; 95% CI [1.48-23.5], p = 0.01)呈正相关。外侧腔室受累与高手术时间、住院时间和新生排尿功能障碍有关。我们的结果支持dPEI作为预测DPE RAL术后手术结果的有用术前工具。它的使用可以改善患者咨询和共同决策,特别是在严重疾病(dPEI≥5)的情况下。
{"title":"Validation of the deep pelvis endometriosis index (dPEI) to evaluate surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery for endometriosis.","authors":"Adèle Reilhac, Shiwa Mansournia, Yohann Dabi, Clément Ferrier, Marie Florin, Meryl Dahan, Cyril Touboul, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Emile Daraï","doi":"10.1007/s11701-026-03141-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03141-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Index (dPEI) is a preoperative MRI-based score initially validated to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic treatment for deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE). Its applicability in robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) has not yet been established. This study aimed to evaluate whether the dPEI can predict surgical outcomes following RAL for DPE. From February 2019 to December 2024, a retrospective analysis from a prospective database including patients undergoing RAL for DPE at Tenon Hospital, Paris, was performed. Preoperative staging was based on MRI and the dPEI scoring system, which evaluates the involvement of different anatomical compartments by deep endometriosis. Patients were classified into three categories: mild endometriosis (dPEI ≤ 2), moderate endometriosis (dPEI 3-4), and severe endometriosis (dPEI ≥ 5). Surgical outcomes including operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification and voiding dysfunction were assessed. A hundred and seventy patients were included. Overall complication rate was 24.7%, including 7.7% Clavien-Dindo grade > II. De novo voiding dysfunction occurred in 10.6% of patients, lasting > 1 month in 4.1%. dPEI categories showed a positive correlation with longer operative time (Spearman's ρ = 0.40, p < 0.001) and increased hospital stay (Spearman's ρ = 0.43, p < 0.001) and were also significantly associated with higher rates of grade > II complications (OR = 13.1; 95% CI [1.54-111.3], p = 0.02) and high incidence of voiding dysfunction (OR = 5.9; 95% CI [1.48-23.5], p = 0.01). Involvement of lateral compartments was associated with high operative time, hospital stay, and de novo voiding dysfunction. Our results support the dPEI as a useful preoperative tool for predicting surgical outcomes after RAL for DPE. Its use can improve patient counseling, and shared decision-making, particularly in cases of severe disease (dPEI ≥ 5).</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost of laparoscopic versus robotic minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 腹腔镜与机器人微创胆囊切除术的有效性、安全性和成本比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02863-8
Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza
<p><p>For over 3 decades, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been established as the standard surgical treatment for gallstone disease. Robotic cholecystectomy (RC) has emerged as an innovative alternative designed to overcome technical limitations of LC, offering enhanced visualization, improved instrument articulation, and superior ergonomics. Despite increasing global adoption, robust comparative evidence regarding operative outcomes, complication rates, patient-centered metrics, and economic impact remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the most recent evidence through 2025 to provide a comprehensive comparison of the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of LC versus RC. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through December 2024, supplemented by manual searches through January 2025. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective cohort studies comparing LC and RC in adults were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data on patient demographics, operative outcomes, complications, length of hospital stay, patient-reported outcomes, and cost metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Meta-analyses were performed for key outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, complications, conversion rates, and hospital stay duration. Heterogeneity was addressed using random-effects models, and subgroup analysis was performed based on study design and geographic region. Population-level context was provided using national databases, including the U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS), ACS NSQIP, and Medicare claims. A potential limitation is the exclusion of non-English language studies. 38 studies including over 412,000 patients were analyzed. LC accounted for approximately 85-95% of all cholecystectomy procedures globally, while RC utilization increased from < 1 to 3-26% across regions by 2024. Pooled analysis showed longer operative times for RC in Western centers (75 vs. 60 min; p < 0.001), whereas some Asian institutions reported shorter times with RC (22 vs. 33 min; p = 0.0025). Pooled analysis indicated a higher rate of bile duct injury with RC (0.72% vs. 0.23%; relative risk 3.12, 95% CI 2.34-3.91; p < 0.001) although this finding should be interpreted with caution due to potential confounders, such as early learning curve effects and coding variability in administrative data. RC demonstrated a lower risk of serious complications (odds ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98), reduced conversion to open surgery (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.61), and decreased likelihood of hospitalization ≥ 24 h (odds ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81). Overall hospital stay was similar between approaches (1.4-2.7 days). RC incurred higher costs ($5000-6000 vs. $2000-3000 per case; European centers: €2088 vs. €172
30多年来,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)已被确立为胆结石疾病的标准手术治疗方法。机器人胆囊切除术(RC)已成为一种创新的替代方案,旨在克服LC的技术局限性,提供增强的可视化,改进的仪器关节和优越的人体工程学。尽管全球越来越多地采用,但关于手术结果、并发症发生率、以患者为中心的指标和经济影响的有力比较证据仍然有限。本系统综述和荟萃分析综合了截至2025年的最新证据,对LC与RC的安全性、有效性和成本效益进行了全面比较。在PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的系统搜索,从成立到2024年12月,辅以人工搜索到2025年1月。包括随机对照试验、前瞻性队列研究和回顾性队列研究,比较成人LC和RC。两名独立审稿人提取了患者人口统计学、手术结果、并发症、住院时间、患者报告的结果和成本指标的数据。随机试验采用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0工具,观察性研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估方法学质量。对主要结局进行荟萃分析,包括手术时间、出血量、并发症、转换率和住院时间。采用随机效应模型解决异质性问题,并根据研究设计和地理区域进行亚组分析。使用国家数据库提供人口水平背景,包括美国国家住院患者样本(NIS), ACS NSQIP和医疗保险索赔。一个潜在的限制是排除了非英语语言的学习。共分析了38项研究,包括41.2万多名患者。LC约占全球所有胆囊切除术手术的85-95%,而RC的使用率则增加了
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost of laparoscopic versus robotic minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02863-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02863-8","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For over 3 decades, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been established as the standard surgical treatment for gallstone disease. Robotic cholecystectomy (RC) has emerged as an innovative alternative designed to overcome technical limitations of LC, offering enhanced visualization, improved instrument articulation, and superior ergonomics. Despite increasing global adoption, robust comparative evidence regarding operative outcomes, complication rates, patient-centered metrics, and economic impact remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the most recent evidence through 2025 to provide a comprehensive comparison of the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of LC versus RC. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through December 2024, supplemented by manual searches through January 2025. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective cohort studies comparing LC and RC in adults were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data on patient demographics, operative outcomes, complications, length of hospital stay, patient-reported outcomes, and cost metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Meta-analyses were performed for key outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, complications, conversion rates, and hospital stay duration. Heterogeneity was addressed using random-effects models, and subgroup analysis was performed based on study design and geographic region. Population-level context was provided using national databases, including the U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS), ACS NSQIP, and Medicare claims. A potential limitation is the exclusion of non-English language studies. 38 studies including over 412,000 patients were analyzed. LC accounted for approximately 85-95% of all cholecystectomy procedures globally, while RC utilization increased from &lt; 1 to 3-26% across regions by 2024. Pooled analysis showed longer operative times for RC in Western centers (75 vs. 60 min; p &lt; 0.001), whereas some Asian institutions reported shorter times with RC (22 vs. 33 min; p = 0.0025). Pooled analysis indicated a higher rate of bile duct injury with RC (0.72% vs. 0.23%; relative risk 3.12, 95% CI 2.34-3.91; p &lt; 0.001) although this finding should be interpreted with caution due to potential confounders, such as early learning curve effects and coding variability in administrative data. RC demonstrated a lower risk of serious complications (odds ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98), reduced conversion to open surgery (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.61), and decreased likelihood of hospitalization ≥ 24 h (odds ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81). Overall hospital stay was similar between approaches (1.4-2.7 days). RC incurred higher costs ($5000-6000 vs. $2000-3000 per case; European centers: €2088 vs. €172","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global research hotspots and emerging trends in orthopedic robotic surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. 骨科机器人手术的全球研究热点和新趋势:综合文献计量分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02998-8
Zhengyi Yang, Xiaohu Chang, Guangyu Fu, Xiaoxiao Wu, Jifeng Fan, Changming Zhou

Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery has garnered significant attention, yet comprehensive bibliometric and visualization analyses in this field remain scarce. This study aims to systematically map and visualize the global research landscape of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery. Employing bibliometric analysis methods and a suite of visualization tools-including CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Scimago Graphica-this study systematically examined literature on orthopedic robotic surgery published in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) core collection from 2005 to 2024, analyzing global research trends across multiple dimensions. These dimensions encompass annual publication volume, collaborative networks among countries/regions and institutions, journal co-occurrence, keyword co-occurrence and clustering, research evolution pathways, and emerging keywords. A total of 820 articles on orthopedic robotics were included from 2005 to 2024. Analysis indicates exponential growth in global orthopedic robotic surgery research, with annual publications increasing from 5 in 2005 to 185 in 2024. The United States (338 articles), China (152 articles), and the United Kingdom (94 articles) emerged as core publishing nations. Institutional collaborations formed four major clusters: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and industry-academia-research partnerships. Key influential journals in orthopedic robotic surgery include the Journal of Arthroplasty, Journal of Knee Surgery & Sports Traumatology & Arthroscopy, International Journal of Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, and International Journal of Orthopaedic Knee Surgery. Research hotspots are highly concentrated in three key areas: prosthesis stability and long-term survival in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA); precise alignment and soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA); and accurate navigation and safe placement of pedicle screws in robot-assisted spinal surgery. Emerging keywords indicate recent research emphasis on "lumbar spine," "national joint registries," "patient matching," and "total hip." Orthopedic robotic surgery research is currently undergoing rapid development, with technology integration, precision, and personalization emerging as primary future directions. This study provides a reference framework for researchers to track field trajectories and optimize research planning, while also offering theoretical support for clinical practice and technological innovation.

机器人辅助骨科手术已经引起了极大的关注,但在这一领域全面的文献计量学and可视化分析仍然很少。本研究旨在系统地绘制和可视化机器人辅助骨科手术的全球研究景观。本研究采用文献计量学分析方法和一套可视化工具(包括CiteSpace、VOSviewer和Scimago graphica),系统地检查了2005年至2024年科学引文索引扩展(SCIE)核心集中发表的骨科机器人手术文献,从多个维度分析了全球研究趋势。这些维度包括年出版量、国家/地区和机构之间的合作网络、期刊共现、关键词共现和聚类、研究演变路径和新兴关键词。2005 - 2024年共收录骨科机器人相关文献820篇。分析表明,全球骨科机器人手术研究呈指数增长,年度出版物从2005年的5篇增加到2024年的185篇。美国(338篇)、中国(152篇)、英国(94篇)成为核心出版国。机构合作形成了四大集群:北美、欧洲、亚太和产学研伙伴关系。骨科机器人手术领域具有重要影响力的期刊包括《关节成形术杂志》、《膝关节外科与运动创伤学与关节镜杂志》、《国际计算机辅助放射学与外科学杂志》和《国际骨科膝关节外科杂志》。目前的研究热点集中在三个关键领域:机器人辅助全髋关节置换术中假体的稳定性和长期存活;机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的精确对齐和软组织平衡在机器人辅助脊柱手术中精确导航和安全放置椎弓根螺钉。新出现的关键词表明,最近的研究重点是“腰椎”、“国家关节登记”、“患者匹配”和“全髋关节”。目前,骨科机器人手术研究正处于快速发展阶段,技术集成化、精密化和个性化是未来的主要方向。本研究为研究人员追踪研究轨迹、优化研究规划提供了参考框架,同时也为临床实践和技术创新提供了理论支持。
{"title":"Global research hotspots and emerging trends in orthopedic robotic surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Zhengyi Yang, Xiaohu Chang, Guangyu Fu, Xiaoxiao Wu, Jifeng Fan, Changming Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02998-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-025-02998-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery has garnered significant attention, yet comprehensive bibliometric and visualization analyses in this field remain scarce. This study aims to systematically map and visualize the global research landscape of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery. Employing bibliometric analysis methods and a suite of visualization tools-including CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Scimago Graphica-this study systematically examined literature on orthopedic robotic surgery published in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) core collection from 2005 to 2024, analyzing global research trends across multiple dimensions. These dimensions encompass annual publication volume, collaborative networks among countries/regions and institutions, journal co-occurrence, keyword co-occurrence and clustering, research evolution pathways, and emerging keywords. A total of 820 articles on orthopedic robotics were included from 2005 to 2024. Analysis indicates exponential growth in global orthopedic robotic surgery research, with annual publications increasing from 5 in 2005 to 185 in 2024. The United States (338 articles), China (152 articles), and the United Kingdom (94 articles) emerged as core publishing nations. Institutional collaborations formed four major clusters: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and industry-academia-research partnerships. Key influential journals in orthopedic robotic surgery include the Journal of Arthroplasty, Journal of Knee Surgery & Sports Traumatology & Arthroscopy, International Journal of Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, and International Journal of Orthopaedic Knee Surgery. Research hotspots are highly concentrated in three key areas: prosthesis stability and long-term survival in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA); precise alignment and soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA); and accurate navigation and safe placement of pedicle screws in robot-assisted spinal surgery. Emerging keywords indicate recent research emphasis on \"lumbar spine,\" \"national joint registries,\" \"patient matching,\" and \"total hip.\" Orthopedic robotic surgery research is currently undergoing rapid development, with technology integration, precision, and personalization emerging as primary future directions. This study provides a reference framework for researchers to track field trajectories and optimize research planning, while also offering theoretical support for clinical practice and technological innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12808197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145985767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery in medical tourism: a retrospective descriptive study. 医疗旅游中的机器人辅助减肥手术:回顾性描述性研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03134-2
Jesús Elías Ortíz-Gómez, Paloma Sarai Arellanes-Herrera, Alberto Iván González-Barajas, Diego Escarraman-Martinez, Ashuin Kammar-García, Manuel Alberto Guerrero-Gutiérrez

Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has shown sustained growth in recent years. However, evidence on its performance in the context of medical tourism is limited. This study describes the implementation of a robotic bariatric surgery program in a highly specialized center, analyzing the evolution of operative times and the learning curve of the surgical team. Observational, retrospective, and descriptive study that included all patients undergoing robotic-assisted bariatric surgery between January 2023 and May 2025. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were recorded, including total surgery time, docking time, and console time. Comparisons between years were made using ANOVA and Tukey's test, considering p < 0.05 as statistically significant. Ninetyfour cases were analyzed with a mean age of 42.8 (SD: 11.3) years and body mass index of 41.8 (SD: 7.7) kg/m²; 84% were women. Sleeve gastrectomy was the most frequent procedure (56.4%). The average docking, surgery and console times were 7.6 (SD: 3.0), 111.6 (SD: 51.0) and 69.6 (SD: 49.3) minutes, respectively. A significant decrease in docking time was observed over the years (p < 0.001), with no significant differences in surgical or console times. The progressive implementation of bariatric robotic surgery in a context of medical tourism is feasible. During the initial years of experience, a significant reduction in docking time was observed, while console and total operative times did not show statistically significant changes, similar to other international centers.

近年来,机器人辅助减肥手术持续增长。然而,在医疗旅游的背景下,其表现的证据是有限的。本研究描述了在一个高度专业化的中心实施一个机器人减肥手术计划,分析手术时间的演变和手术团队的学习曲线。观察性、回顾性和描述性研究,包括2023年1月至2025年5月期间接受机器人辅助减肥手术的所有患者。记录人口统计学、临床和手术变量,包括总手术时间、对接时间和控制台时间。年份间比较采用方差分析和Tukey检验,考虑p
{"title":"Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery in medical tourism: a retrospective descriptive study.","authors":"Jesús Elías Ortíz-Gómez, Paloma Sarai Arellanes-Herrera, Alberto Iván González-Barajas, Diego Escarraman-Martinez, Ashuin Kammar-García, Manuel Alberto Guerrero-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03134-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03134-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has shown sustained growth in recent years. However, evidence on its performance in the context of medical tourism is limited. This study describes the implementation of a robotic bariatric surgery program in a highly specialized center, analyzing the evolution of operative times and the learning curve of the surgical team. Observational, retrospective, and descriptive study that included all patients undergoing robotic-assisted bariatric surgery between January 2023 and May 2025. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were recorded, including total surgery time, docking time, and console time. Comparisons between years were made using ANOVA and Tukey's test, considering p < 0.05 as statistically significant. Ninetyfour cases were analyzed with a mean age of 42.8 (SD: 11.3) years and body mass index of 41.8 (SD: 7.7) kg/m²; 84% were women. Sleeve gastrectomy was the most frequent procedure (56.4%). The average docking, surgery and console times were 7.6 (SD: 3.0), 111.6 (SD: 51.0) and 69.6 (SD: 49.3) minutes, respectively. A significant decrease in docking time was observed over the years (p < 0.001), with no significant differences in surgical or console times. The progressive implementation of bariatric robotic surgery in a context of medical tourism is feasible. During the initial years of experience, a significant reduction in docking time was observed, while console and total operative times did not show statistically significant changes, similar to other international centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global trends and hotspots in robot-assisted kidney transplantation: A bibliometric and visualization analysis based on CiteSpace. 机器人辅助肾移植的全球趋势和热点:基于CiteSpace的文献计量学和可视化分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03087-6
Rui Yan, Jun Ma, Zewen Li, Yalong Zhang, Kangyu Wang, Hao Wang, Jiangwei Man, Li Yang
{"title":"Global trends and hotspots in robot-assisted kidney transplantation: A bibliometric and visualization analysis based on CiteSpace.","authors":"Rui Yan, Jun Ma, Zewen Li, Yalong Zhang, Kangyu Wang, Hao Wang, Jiangwei Man, Li Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03087-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03087-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145985714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of clinical application and effectiveness of robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty. 机器人辅助经皮后凸成形术的临床应用及疗效评价。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03051-4
Han Wu, Hongzhao Wei, Yiheng Chentang, Renjie Li, Yifei Jin, Yijie Liu
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical application and effectiveness of robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty.","authors":"Han Wu, Hongzhao Wei, Yiheng Chentang, Renjie Li, Yifei Jin, Yijie Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03051-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03051-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative analysis of HURWA versus MAKO robotic-assisted TKA: a prospective cohort study of surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes. HURWA与MAKO机器人辅助TKA的比较分析:手术准确性和临床结果的前瞻性队列研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03020-x
Xiaolong Zhao, Qindong Mi, Wei Wang, Wenwei Qian, Jin Lin

Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has emerged as an advanced surgical technique. However, direct comparisons between Chinese and American robotic systems are limited.

Objective: Exploratory comparison of surgical accuracy and short-term clinical outcomes between Chinese HURWA and American MAKO robotic systems in total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: A prospective exploratory cohort study was conducted from September 2023 to January 2024. Eighty-five patients were assigned to undergo RA-TKA with either the HURWA system (n = 43) or the MAKO system (n = 42) based on the sequential clinical introduction of the systems. The primary outcomes were radiographic accuracy, including the restoration of the mechanical axis within ± 3°. Secondary outcomes encompassed surgical efficiency metrics and patient-reported clinical scores (WOMAC, HSS, VAS) assessed preoperatively and at one-year postoperatively.

Results: All included patients have completed surgery and follow-up.The two systems achieved a comparable and high proportion of mechanical axis restoration within ± 3° (HURWA: 86.05% vs. MAKO: 90.48%). The HURWA system demonstrated a significant advantage in osteotomy time (6.03 ± 2.35 vs. 8.06 ± 2.73 min, P < 0.001). Both groups exhibited substantial and comparable improvements in all clinical outcome scores at the one-year follow-up. The HURWA system, as an open-platform design, offered flexibility in prosthesis selection, while the MAKO system demonstrated a highly standardized workflow.

Conclusion: This exploratory comparison indicates that the HURWA system achieves favorable and comparable one-year clinical outcomes and radiographic alignment to the MAKO system in TKA, with distinct advantages in osteotomy efficiency and implant flexibility. These preliminary findings support the clinical potential of HURWA as a viable option, though definitive conclusions regarding its equivalence require validation through larger, long-term studies.

背景:机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RA-TKA)已成为一项先进的外科技术。然而,中美机器人系统之间的直接比较是有限的。目的:探讨比较中国HURWA和美国MAKO机器人系统在全膝关节置换术中的手术精度和短期临床效果。方法:于2023年9月至2024年1月进行前瞻性探索性队列研究。85名患者被分配使用HURWA系统(n = 43)或MAKO系统(n = 42)进行RA-TKA,基于系统的顺序临床介绍。主要结果是影像学准确度,包括机械轴在±3°范围内的恢复。次要结果包括术前和术后1年评估的手术效率指标和患者报告的临床评分(WOMAC、HSS、VAS)。结果:所有患者均完成手术及随访。两种系统在±3°范围内实现了相当高的机械轴恢复比例(HURWA: 86.05% vs MAKO: 90.48%)。HURWA系统在截骨时间上具有显著优势(6.03±2.35 vs 8.06±2.73 min)。结论:该探索性比较表明,在TKA中,HURWA系统与MAKO系统相比具有良好的1年临床结果和相当的影像学一致性,在截骨效率和种植体灵活性方面具有明显优势。这些初步发现支持HURWA作为一种可行选择的临床潜力,尽管关于其等效性的明确结论需要通过更大规模的长期研究来验证。
{"title":"Comparative analysis of HURWA versus MAKO robotic-assisted TKA: a prospective cohort study of surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Xiaolong Zhao, Qindong Mi, Wei Wang, Wenwei Qian, Jin Lin","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03020-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-025-03020-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has emerged as an advanced surgical technique. However, direct comparisons between Chinese and American robotic systems are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Exploratory comparison of surgical accuracy and short-term clinical outcomes between Chinese HURWA and American MAKO robotic systems in total knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective exploratory cohort study was conducted from September 2023 to January 2024. Eighty-five patients were assigned to undergo RA-TKA with either the HURWA system (n = 43) or the MAKO system (n = 42) based on the sequential clinical introduction of the systems. The primary outcomes were radiographic accuracy, including the restoration of the mechanical axis within ± 3°. Secondary outcomes encompassed surgical efficiency metrics and patient-reported clinical scores (WOMAC, HSS, VAS) assessed preoperatively and at one-year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All included patients have completed surgery and follow-up.The two systems achieved a comparable and high proportion of mechanical axis restoration within ± 3° (HURWA: 86.05% vs. MAKO: 90.48%). The HURWA system demonstrated a significant advantage in osteotomy time (6.03 ± 2.35 vs. 8.06 ± 2.73 min, P < 0.001). Both groups exhibited substantial and comparable improvements in all clinical outcome scores at the one-year follow-up. The HURWA system, as an open-platform design, offered flexibility in prosthesis selection, while the MAKO system demonstrated a highly standardized workflow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This exploratory comparison indicates that the HURWA system achieves favorable and comparable one-year clinical outcomes and radiographic alignment to the MAKO system in TKA, with distinct advantages in osteotomy efficiency and implant flexibility. These preliminary findings support the clinical potential of HURWA as a viable option, though definitive conclusions regarding its equivalence require validation through larger, long-term studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804221/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of patient factors on outcomes in robotic major and minor hepatectomy: importance of patient selection. 患者因素对机器人大、小肝切除术结果的影响:患者选择的重要性。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03152-8
Siman Antar, Inara Merani, Mark G Hall, Sarah D Corn, Ali Ahmad

Robotic approach to hepatectomy has shown promise in recent times. The aim of our study was to identify the impact of various patient variables on outcomes from robotic major and minor hepatectomy. Data on 167 consecutive robotic hepatectomy procedures at our institution was retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed for both minor and major hepatectomy. For major hepatectomy (n = 66), factors associated with increased operative time included cirrhosis (301 vs. 257 min) and obesity (310 vs. 261 min). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was worse in patients with underlying cirrhosis (242 vs. 161 mL), obesity (215 vs. 148mL) and tumor size ≥ 10 cm (232 vs. 136mL). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was also longer with age ≥ 70 years (5.9 vs. 4.5 days), cirrhosis (5.6 vs. 4.6 days) and malignant tumor pathology (5.1 vs. 3.8 days). Similarly, increased postoperative complications were seen with cirrhosis and tumor size ≥ 10 cm. For minor hepatectomy (n = 101), operative time was longer in patients with cirrhosis (139 vs. 105 min), obesity (141 vs. 115 min) and posterior-superior (PS) liver resection (168 vs. 104 min). Similarly, EBL was higher in cirrhotic patients (163 vs. 58mL) and those with PS resection (152 vs. 64mL). Longer LOS was observed in elderly patients (2.9 vs. 2.0 days), cirrhosis (2.9 vs. 2.1 days) and PS resection (2.8 vs. 2.1 days). Our study offers a comprehensive understanding of the impact of clinicopathologic factors on outcomes and can be utilized as a guide to appropriate patient selection, especially for surgeons starting a robotic hepatectomy practice.

近年来,机器人肝切除术已显示出前景。我们研究的目的是确定各种患者变量对机器人大、小肝切除术结果的影响。回顾性分析我院167例连续机器人肝切除术的数据。分析小肝切除术和大肝切除术的围手术期结果。对于大肝切除术(n = 66),与手术时间增加相关的因素包括肝硬化(301对257分钟)和肥胖(310对261分钟)。潜在肝硬化(242 vs 161 mL)、肥胖(215 vs 148mL)和肿瘤大小≥10 cm (232 vs 136mL)患者的估计失血量(EBL)更差。住院时间(LOS)也随着年龄≥70岁(5.9 vs. 4.5天)、肝硬化(5.6 vs. 4.6天)和恶性肿瘤病理(5.1 vs. 3.8天)而变长。同样,肝硬化和肿瘤大小≥10 cm的患者术后并发症增加。对于轻度肝切除术(n = 101),肝硬化(139比105分钟)、肥胖(141比115分钟)和后上(PS)肝切除术(168比104分钟)患者的手术时间更长。同样,肝硬化患者(163比58mL)和PS切除术患者(152比64mL)的EBL更高。老年患者(2.9天vs. 2.0天)、肝硬化患者(2.9天vs. 2.1天)和PS切除术患者(2.8天vs. 2.1天)的LOS较长。我们的研究提供了对临床病理因素对结果的影响的全面理解,可以作为适当患者选择的指导,特别是对于开始机器人肝切除术实践的外科医生。
{"title":"Impact of patient factors on outcomes in robotic major and minor hepatectomy: importance of patient selection.","authors":"Siman Antar, Inara Merani, Mark G Hall, Sarah D Corn, Ali Ahmad","doi":"10.1007/s11701-026-03152-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03152-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic approach to hepatectomy has shown promise in recent times. The aim of our study was to identify the impact of various patient variables on outcomes from robotic major and minor hepatectomy. Data on 167 consecutive robotic hepatectomy procedures at our institution was retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed for both minor and major hepatectomy. For major hepatectomy (n = 66), factors associated with increased operative time included cirrhosis (301 vs. 257 min) and obesity (310 vs. 261 min). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was worse in patients with underlying cirrhosis (242 vs. 161 mL), obesity (215 vs. 148mL) and tumor size ≥ 10 cm (232 vs. 136mL). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was also longer with age ≥ 70 years (5.9 vs. 4.5 days), cirrhosis (5.6 vs. 4.6 days) and malignant tumor pathology (5.1 vs. 3.8 days). Similarly, increased postoperative complications were seen with cirrhosis and tumor size ≥ 10 cm. For minor hepatectomy (n = 101), operative time was longer in patients with cirrhosis (139 vs. 105 min), obesity (141 vs. 115 min) and posterior-superior (PS) liver resection (168 vs. 104 min). Similarly, EBL was higher in cirrhotic patients (163 vs. 58mL) and those with PS resection (152 vs. 64mL). Longer LOS was observed in elderly patients (2.9 vs. 2.0 days), cirrhosis (2.9 vs. 2.1 days) and PS resection (2.8 vs. 2.1 days). Our study offers a comprehensive understanding of the impact of clinicopathologic factors on outcomes and can be utilized as a guide to appropriate patient selection, especially for surgeons starting a robotic hepatectomy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Morbi-mortality of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder carcinoma by urinary diversion type. 机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术的发病率与死亡率。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03059-w
Corentin Deniaud, Benoit Mesnard, Soline Bobet, Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe, Julien Branchereau, Stéphane De Vergie, Jérôme Rigaud

To compare early and late complications rates after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder tumors and certain high-risk non-muscle-invasive tumors according to the type of reconstruction. We conducted a single-center retrospective study including 109 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy between 2008 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on urinary diversion: extracorporeal Bricker ileal conduit (n = 74) or orthotopic neobladder (n = 35). Complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Operative time was significantly longer for neobladder reconstruction (320 vs. 291 min, p = 0.047), as was hospital stay (14 vs. 10 days, p < 0.001). Early complications (< 30 days) occurred in 59.6% of patients, with a higher rate of minor complications in the neobladder group (57.1% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in major complications (Clavien III-V) or late complications (> 30 days), which affected 47.7% of patients. Operative time was an independent risk factor for major complications (OR = 1.15 per additional 15 min). Neobladder reconstruction was associated with increased early morbidity, mainly minor, without impact on late morbidity or mortality. Urinary diversion choice should be guided by patient profile and expected functional benefits.

比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱肌肉浸润性肿瘤与某些高危非肌肉浸润性肿瘤根据重建类型的早期和晚期并发症发生率。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,包括109名在2008年至2022年间接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的患者。患者根据尿分流分为两组:体外砖头回肠导管(n = 74)和原位新膀胱(n = 35)。并发症采用Clavien-Dindo分级。多变量分析确定了发病率和死亡率的独立危险因素。新膀胱重建术的手术时间明显更长(320 vs 291分钟,p = 0.047),住院时间明显更长(14 vs 10天,p = 30天),影响了47.7%的患者。手术时间是主要并发症的独立危险因素(OR = 1.15 /每增加15分钟)。新膀胱重建与早期发病率增加有关,主要是轻微的,对晚期发病率或死亡率没有影响。尿转移的选择应根据患者的情况和预期的功能益处来指导。
{"title":"Morbi-mortality of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder carcinoma by urinary diversion type.","authors":"Corentin Deniaud, Benoit Mesnard, Soline Bobet, Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe, Julien Branchereau, Stéphane De Vergie, Jérôme Rigaud","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03059-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03059-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare early and late complications rates after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder tumors and certain high-risk non-muscle-invasive tumors according to the type of reconstruction. We conducted a single-center retrospective study including 109 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy between 2008 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on urinary diversion: extracorporeal Bricker ileal conduit (n = 74) or orthotopic neobladder (n = 35). Complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Operative time was significantly longer for neobladder reconstruction (320 vs. 291 min, p = 0.047), as was hospital stay (14 vs. 10 days, p < 0.001). Early complications (< 30 days) occurred in 59.6% of patients, with a higher rate of minor complications in the neobladder group (57.1% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in major complications (Clavien III-V) or late complications (> 30 days), which affected 47.7% of patients. Operative time was an independent risk factor for major complications (OR = 1.15 per additional 15 min). Neobladder reconstruction was associated with increased early morbidity, mainly minor, without impact on late morbidity or mortality. Urinary diversion choice should be guided by patient profile and expected functional benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phased active warming protocol for prevention of intraoperative hypothermia in Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer. 达芬奇机器人辅助直肠癌根治术中预防术中低温的阶段性主动升温方案。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03098-3
Hao Ge, Xiaoru Fang, Biqing Dou, Kai Wang

To evaluate the effectiveness of a phased active warming protocol in preventing intraoperative hypothermia during Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer. A single-center retrospective cohort analysis examined patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted rectal cancer resection from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, patients receiving phased active warming protocol were matched with those under routine thermal care. Variables for matching encompassed age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgical duration, and anesthesia time. Primary outcome measured was intraoperative hypothermia incidence (core temperature below 36 °C). Secondary outcomes covered mean core temperature, postoperative shivering evaluated through Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale, surgical site infection rates, blood transfusion needs, hospital stay duration, and perioperative costs. Following propensity score matching, each group contained 144 patients (total n = 288). Hypothermia occurrence dropped markedly in the intervention cohort (26 cases [18.1%] versus 70 cases [48.6%], p < 0.001). End-of-surgery core temperature showed higher values in the intervention cohort (36.4 ± 0.5 °C compared to 35.8 ± 0.6 °C, p < 0.001). Shivering after surgery (BSAS score of 1 or greater) demonstrated reduced frequency in the intervention cohort (18 patients [12.5%] versus 50 patients [34.7%], p < 0.001). Wound infection rates decreased in the intervention cohort (6 cases [4.2%] versus 17 cases [11.8%], p = 0.022). Hospital stays shortened for the intervention cohort (8.2 ± 2.1 days compared to 10.5 ± 3.4 days, p < 0.001). The phased active warming approach substantially decreased hypothermia occurrence and enhanced perioperative outcomes in Da Vinci robot-assisted rectal cancer resection patients, demonstrating clinical value warranting widespread adoption.

评估阶段性主动升温方案在达芬奇机器人辅助直肠癌根治术中预防术中低温的有效性。一项单中心回顾性队列分析研究了2022年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间接受达芬奇机器人辅助直肠癌切除术的患者。采用1:1倾向评分匹配,将接受分阶段主动升温方案的患者与接受常规升温护理的患者进行匹配。匹配变量包括年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师学会分类、手术时间和麻醉时间。测量的主要结果是术中低温发生率(核心温度低于36°C)。次要结果包括平均核心温度、通过床边颤抖评估量表评估的术后颤抖、手术部位感染率、输血需求、住院时间和围手术期费用。根据倾向评分匹配,每组144例患者(总n = 288)。干预组低体温发生率明显下降(26例[18.1%]对70例[48.6%],p
{"title":"Phased active warming protocol for prevention of intraoperative hypothermia in Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer.","authors":"Hao Ge, Xiaoru Fang, Biqing Dou, Kai Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-03098-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03098-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of a phased active warming protocol in preventing intraoperative hypothermia during Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer. A single-center retrospective cohort analysis examined patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted rectal cancer resection from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, patients receiving phased active warming protocol were matched with those under routine thermal care. Variables for matching encompassed age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgical duration, and anesthesia time. Primary outcome measured was intraoperative hypothermia incidence (core temperature below 36 °C). Secondary outcomes covered mean core temperature, postoperative shivering evaluated through Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale, surgical site infection rates, blood transfusion needs, hospital stay duration, and perioperative costs. Following propensity score matching, each group contained 144 patients (total n = 288). Hypothermia occurrence dropped markedly in the intervention cohort (26 cases [18.1%] versus 70 cases [48.6%], p < 0.001). End-of-surgery core temperature showed higher values in the intervention cohort (36.4 ± 0.5 °C compared to 35.8 ± 0.6 °C, p < 0.001). Shivering after surgery (BSAS score of 1 or greater) demonstrated reduced frequency in the intervention cohort (18 patients [12.5%] versus 50 patients [34.7%], p < 0.001). Wound infection rates decreased in the intervention cohort (6 cases [4.2%] versus 17 cases [11.8%], p = 0.022). Hospital stays shortened for the intervention cohort (8.2 ± 2.1 days compared to 10.5 ± 3.4 days, p < 0.001). The phased active warming approach substantially decreased hypothermia occurrence and enhanced perioperative outcomes in Da Vinci robot-assisted rectal cancer resection patients, demonstrating clinical value warranting widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Robotic Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1