Gesundheitswesen最新文献

Purpose: This scoping review aims to provide an overview of previously published treatment strategies that are multimodal, rather than purely drug-based and may be considered for home- or bedbound ME/CFS patients. Thus, the focus lies upon the analyses of telemedicine as well as home treatment elements. In addition, the evaluation and assessment methods used in these studies will be further discussed.

Methods: Using the scoping review method, a literature analysis was conducted resulting in a total of 14 publications which met the predefined criteria. Inclusion was based on models applicable to housebound individuals with ME/CFS, focusing on social medicine and psychological support services rather than individual drug strategies.

Results: The analysis demonstrated that the appropriate treatment methods were predominantly home visits (n=5) or a telemedicine format (n=7). Studies which used alternative settings were included if conversion to a telemedicine format was viable. The important factors highlighted in several studies (n=8), when considering this patient group, were individualisation and flexibility of the treatment methods, and thus the ability to address the day-to-day levels of impairment. The explicit involvement of families in the treatment plan were described in a total of six studies. In ten articles, the treatment concept was additionally evaluated, predominantly using questionnaires (n=7), whilst the questionnaires used were not consistent. Qualitative evaluations were invariably conducted using Brown and Clarke's thematic analysis (n=3).

Conclusion: Publications on multimodal treatment strategies for homebound ME/CFS patients are rare. However approaches using home visits or telemedicine are described. The majority of identified publications addressed the need for individualised as well as flexible patient care, whilst some were dedicated to the added value of involving the patients' family. The data outline the specific challenges associated with the care of severely affected ME/CFS patients that should also be considered in the context of research.

Background: The data-related desolate state of the health authorities became evident at the latest with the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. The lack of interoperability and networking among health authorities quickly developed into blockages in contact tracing and pandemic control.

Methodology: As a basis for the study, key figures and funding volumes from the Pact-Public Health Service (Pakt-ÖGD) were evaluated and analyzed using descriptive parameters. In addition, a literature review on the Pakt-ÖGD and related terms was carried out.

Results: The Pakt-ÖGD represents the largest financing offensive for the Public Health Service to date. Despite the digitalization pact and the first distributions of funds, there is no consensus on the goals of digitalization such as the ISCODE, Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability und Reuse (FAIR concept). The RKI is currently presenting a new electronic reporting and information system for health authorities (EMIGA), which is to be introduced parallel to DEMIS as a nationwide core application for infection protection.

Conclusion: In analogy to health literacy, the public health service needs increased digital literacy to strengthen competence in order to agree on common goals of ISCODE and the FAIR concept, i.e. what digitalization should create or not. A sustainable public health service requires an open and connectable network that goes beyond infection protection (pandemic prevention, preparedness and response - PPPR) to a global One-Health platform.

Background: Health Services Research (HSR) is a growing field in Germany, in which Organisational Health Services Research (OHSR) has emerged as a subfield. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the field of OHSR within HSR in Germany and to map systematically original contributions by describing the organisational setting, the research design, the research objectives and the theoretical underpinning.

Methods: A scoping review examined published abstracts from the 19th German Conference on Health Services Research 2020. Abstracts were included if (1) health care organisations, subunits or organisational processes were mentioned as research objects, and (2) if at least one out of five research perspectives from a recent German definition of OHSR was addressed. After intensive pilot screenings within a group of nine researchers, all abstracts were screened independently in three review teams with three researchers each, and data from included abstracts were extracted using content analysis based on a self-developed detailed coding scheme.

Results: Out of n=468 identified abstracts in German (84%) or English (16%) language, n=138 (29.5%) abstracts were included. The majority of included abstracts addressed acute care in hospitals (34.8%), reported results from observational studies (59.4%) and collected primary data (69.6%). There was a slightly higher use of quantitative (32.6%) than qualitative (24.6%) research methods with a considerable number of studies using more than one method (31.9%). An explicit reference to theory was made in 7.2% and 17.4% used the term 'organisation' or related terms explicitly in their abstract.

Conclusion: This review provides a systematic but preliminary overview of the scope to which HSR in Germany addresses OHSR. The organisational perspective is considered extensively in HSR abstracts, but mostly implicitly. The research is reported largely free of theory which can reduce their explanatory power. Therefore, a research agenda, more awareness as well as education and better conceptualisation of OHSR topics within German HSR are needed.

Background: In rural areas in Germany, the number of emergency departments with pediatric expertise decreases. Telemedicine solutions are used sporadically, but they lack certain parameters for assessing a child's health status, such as touch and smell. We tested and evaluated the implementation of a telemedical, cross-hospital urgency assessment in pediatric emergency rooms. The telemedical urgency assessments were carried out via video conferences and were compared to the usual on-site procedure. Primary results of the concordance analysis have been published elsewhere. This work describes the results of the evaluation of the implementation.

Methods: The telemedical urgency assessment was carried out in 5 pediatric emergency departments during the years 2015-2019. Various methods were used to evaluate the implementation. The following reports are based on (a) a parent questionnaire with two statements to be evaluated (entire project duration), (b) a survey of the physicians using telemedicine after each case (entire project duration) and (c) detailed process documentation (July 2017 until end of the project).

Results: A total of 266 patients under 18 years old, recruited from four hospitals, were included in the study. (a) 210 parents completed the questionnaire. 78% of the parents felt adequately cared for and 70% could imagine telemedicine becoming established as a future supplementary care procedure. (b) The physicians' questionnaires for the telemedicine site were completed in 232 cases (87%). The average satisfaction rating was 1.8 on a 6-point-likert-scale (95% confidence interval: 1.64; 1.95). (c) The most frequent implementation problem concerned the technical implementation of the video conference. The evaluation of the accompanying documentation revealed in particular implementation barriers in the technical area (e. g. limited video and/or audio quality) and in the provision of human resources.

Conclusion: Despite implementation barriers, the project showed that telemedical urgency assessment in acute pediatric care is a promising option for supporting care. Most of the participating clinicians needed a high level of support, which in some cases indicated a rather low level of digital competence. Increasing acceptance of telemedicine functionalities requires changes in society as a whole with improved framework conditions.

With the new ICD-11 developed by the WHO and translated into German for use in Germany by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, the German healthcare system is facing a change that is more than a simple change of a medical coding system. The ICD-11 modernises the coding system, for example, by including new, separate health conditions such as sleep-wake disorders and conditions related to sexual health, thus making the corresponding diseases more visible. The ICD-11 is more precise than the ICD-10: it allows cross-referencing between diagnoses, symptoms, functionality and locations and partially abandons the strict hierarchy of the ICD-10. In addition, a greater number of rare diseases are represented with their own specific code than was previously possible with ICD-10. Finally, the ICD-11 is also significantly more "modern" than the ICD-10 (which dates back to pre-digital times) in that it enables new, digitally-supported processes, such as keywords flexibility and sustainability when updating the system as well as actual coding at the point of care. The switch to ICD-11 can be a great opportunity for the German healthcare system that should not be missed. It will benefit health service research, which at best will be able to work with much more detailed and correct data sets. But medical care will also benefit because the ICD-11 reflects current medical knowledge. In addition, certain illnesses will be removed from the psychiatric category, meaning that those affected will no longer be stigmatised by their classification in the ICD. The improved coding of diagnoses will ultimately also support guideline-based treatments. However, the changeover is only the first step. The challenges - also for health service research - include in particular the latency of introduction and uniform use as well as the necessary change in coding habits. For ICD-11 to be a success in Germany, authorities, the medical profession, payers and patients must work together on strategies to ensure not only a rapid but also a comprehensive implementation that maximises the potential of ICD-11.

Background: The built environment is a key component of dementia-specific care. Little is known about the characteristics of dementia-sensitive environmental elements in living units of nursing homes in Germany. The German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT) is a systematic assessment tool for describing these elements in detail.

Aim of the study: To describe the extent of dementia-sensitive design principles and environmental elements in a regionally limited sample of living units in Germany.

Methods: The built environment was assessed using G-EAT and analysed quantitatively and descriptively. Definitions of living units were developed based on site visits and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: The 42 participating living units were heterogeneous in terms of space and composition. Dementia-sensitive design principles varied greatly in their implementation in the built environment; on average, 87.7% of the environmental elements were oriented towards a familiar environment. In contrast, visual accessibility was much less frequently enabled by the built environment (mean 37.3%).

Conclusions: The characteristics of various dementia-sensitive environmental elements need to be further investigated against the background of the nursing home care concept and the homogeneity of the resident group to enable the initiation of tailored environmental adaptation that can be implemented by interdisciplinary teams in nursing homes. This also requires a follow-up study with a larger sample of living units to identify the factors that promote and inhibit the development of a dementia-sensitive environment.