Germany coped with the coronavirus pandemic not least because of its well-equipped medical care system with a high density of doctors and hospitals. In the first wave in particular, the public health service also assumed responsibility for population medicine. The coronavirus crisis revealed the need for better equipment, expertise and sectoral coordination between health authorities. The pandemic exhibited the close connection between various health-related challenges, disease areas and health inequalities. Better coordination and cooperation between individual medical care, in particular general practitioners, and public health services responsible for population medicine is necessary for the future management of acute and chronic health problems. International experience shows how effective integration of these sectors can contribute to improving health care and reducing health inequalities. Against the background of the international health sciences debate, this article first presents the concepts of primary health care (PHC) and public health (PH). It then discusses the opportunities and challenges of a closer integration of primary health care and public health services, develops approaches for the corresponding further development of the German healthcare system and analyses the resulting options for improving population health.
{"title":"[Public health in Germany: linking care and prevention].","authors":"Jens Holst, Peter Tinnemann, Nicolai Savaskan","doi":"10.1055/a-2701-4143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2701-4143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Germany coped with the coronavirus pandemic not least because of its well-equipped medical care system with a high density of doctors and hospitals. In the first wave in particular, the public health service also assumed responsibility for population medicine. The coronavirus crisis revealed the need for better equipment, expertise and sectoral coordination between health authorities. The pandemic exhibited the close connection between various health-related challenges, disease areas and health inequalities. Better coordination and cooperation between individual medical care, in particular general practitioners, and public health services responsible for population medicine is necessary for the future management of acute and chronic health problems. International experience shows how effective integration of these sectors can contribute to improving health care and reducing health inequalities. Against the background of the international health sciences debate, this article first presents the concepts of primary health care (PHC) and public health (PH). It then discusses the opportunities and challenges of a closer integration of primary health care and public health services, develops approaches for the corresponding further development of the German healthcare system and analyses the resulting options for improving population health.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-19DOI: 10.1055/a-2543-3179
Sarah Heimbuch, Luisa Tischler, Angelika Beyer, Yvonne Jordan, Nils Pfeuffer, Heiko Krause, Neeltje van den Berg
The telemedical networking of children's clinics of varying sizes and specializations can support healthcare close to home, especially in rural regions with structural limitations. A Regional Tele-Paediatric Network was implemented in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and North Brandenburg (innovation fund project RTP-Net). This study examines the question of how participating parents accepted and evaluated this form of care.Parents of paediatric patients at a participating clinic were invited to take part in the study during the observation period 02.2021 to 03.2023 study. A mixed-methods approach was used that comprised a standardized questionnaire. The interviews were transcribed, categorized according to Kuckartz and subjected to descriptive evaluation. Between 12.2023 to 02.2024, telephone interviews were conducted with parents who had agreed to be recontacted.A total of 507 cases (403 patients) were included in the RTP-Net. Data from 138 questionnaires were analyzed. 74.5% of parents found that the use of telemedicine was helpful for the treatment of their child; 88.1% could imagine that telemedicine could supplement paediatric healthcare in the future. Parents interviewed over the telephone (n=11) rated telemedicine services positively. The main advantages mentioned were saving in time and distance, availability of specialist expertise and avoidance of long waiting times. There were concerns about the lack of physical contact between telemedicine doctor and patient.Parents show a high level of acceptance of telemedicine and trust in the provision of telemedical services. Telemedicine can help parents to avoid the burden of long journeys and waiting times and improve access to specialist medical expertise. In order to improve the acceptance and satisfaction of parents, it is important to inform them about the results if the telemedical advice was based on a doctor-to-doctor consultation.
不同规模和专业的儿童诊所的远程医疗网络可以支持离家近的医疗保健,特别是在结构受限的农村地区。在梅克伦堡-西波美拉尼亚和北勃兰登堡实施了区域远程儿科网络(创新基金项目RTP-Net)。本研究探讨了参与的父母如何接受和评估这种形式的照顾。在2021年2月至2023年3月的观察期内,邀请参与诊所的儿科患者家长参加研究。采用了一种混合方法,包括一份标准化问卷。这些采访被记录下来,按照库卡兹的说法进行分类,并进行描述性评价。在2023年12月至2024年2月期间,对同意再次联系的家长进行了电话访谈。共有507例(403例)患者被纳入RTP-Net。分析了138份问卷的数据。74.5%的家长认为使用远程医疗对孩子的治疗有帮助;88.1%的人认为远程医疗将来可以作为儿科医疗的补充。通过电话访问的家长(n=11)对远程医疗服务给予积极评价。提到的主要优点是节省时间和距离,可获得专业知识和避免长时间等待。有人担心远程医疗医生和病人之间缺乏身体接触。家长对远程医疗的接受程度较高,对提供远程医疗服务的信任程度较高。远程医疗可以帮助父母避免长途旅行和等待时间的负担,并改善获得专业医疗知识的机会。为了提高家长的接受度和满意度,如果远程医疗建议是基于医生对医生的咨询,告知他们结果是很重要的。1 .在ländlichen区域内进行远程诊断和诊断Größen与专家诊断和诊断研究。在梅克伦堡-前波莫纳州和北勃兰登堡wurde ein Regionales Telepädiatrisches Netzwerk(创新项目RTP-Net)实施。在《出版界》杂志上,我们发现了一种新的方法,那就是将英语翻译成英语,并将其翻译成英语。Der hybrid - methods - ansatz unfasste einen deskriptiv ausgewerteten standardiserten Fragebogen feltern, die ihr Kind in Beobachtungszeitraum 02.2021 and 03.2023 in einer teilnehmenden Klinik vorstellten and Der study teilnahmen。[12] [2023] [02.2024] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1]。《死亡访谈》记录了跨kribiert和吸入式结构分析,以及库卡兹分类分析和分析。e wurden 507 Fälle (403 patients) in das RTP-Net ingeschlossen。Daten aus 138 Elternfragebögen wurden分析器。74,5% der befragten Eltern fanden, dass die Nutzung der Telemedizin hilfreich f, r die Behandlung ihres Kindes战争。88,1% von ihnen können sich vorstellen, dass Telemedizin die pädiatrische Versorgung zuk nftig ergänzt。他的电话采访得到了 hrt。Diese Eltern schätzten telemedizinische Angebote阳性ein。al Vorteile galten等。die Weg- und Zeitersparnis, die verf gbarkeit spezialfachärztlicher expert und die Vermeidung langer Wartezeiten。Bedenken, Bedenken, Bedenken, Bedenken, Bedenken, Bedenken, Bedenken, Bedenken, Bedenken, Bedenken1 .在信息技术方面,我们的研究成果是:1 .在信息技术方面,我们的研究成果是:1 .在信息技术方面,我们的研究成果是:1 .在信息技术方面,我们的研究成果是:在德国,我们有两个孩子,一个是在德国,另一个是在德国,另一个是在德国。荷兰Telemedizin können Belastungen der elteren Durch lange anfahrswge and Wartezeiten vermieden werden and zugangzu spezialfachärztlicher expert verbessert werden。
{"title":"Telemedicine in paediatrics: acceptance and satisfaction from parents' perspective.","authors":"Sarah Heimbuch, Luisa Tischler, Angelika Beyer, Yvonne Jordan, Nils Pfeuffer, Heiko Krause, Neeltje van den Berg","doi":"10.1055/a-2543-3179","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2543-3179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The telemedical networking of children's clinics of varying sizes and specializations can support healthcare close to home, especially in rural regions with structural limitations. A Regional Tele-Paediatric Network was implemented in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and North Brandenburg (innovation fund project RTP-Net). This study examines the question of how participating parents accepted and evaluated this form of care.Parents of paediatric patients at a participating clinic were invited to take part in the study during the observation period 02.2021 to 03.2023 study. A mixed-methods approach was used that comprised a standardized questionnaire. The interviews were transcribed, categorized according to Kuckartz and subjected to descriptive evaluation. Between 12.2023 to 02.2024, telephone interviews were conducted with parents who had agreed to be recontacted.A total of 507 cases (403 patients) were included in the RTP-Net. Data from 138 questionnaires were analyzed. 74.5% of parents found that the use of telemedicine was helpful for the treatment of their child; 88.1% could imagine that telemedicine could supplement paediatric healthcare in the future. Parents interviewed over the telephone (n=11) rated telemedicine services positively. The main advantages mentioned were saving in time and distance, availability of specialist expertise and avoidance of long waiting times. There were concerns about the lack of physical contact between telemedicine doctor and patient.Parents show a high level of acceptance of telemedicine and trust in the provision of telemedical services. Telemedicine can help parents to avoid the burden of long journeys and waiting times and improve access to specialist medical expertise. In order to improve the acceptance and satisfaction of parents, it is important to inform them about the results if the telemedical advice was based on a doctor-to-doctor consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"S317-S323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144102881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-06DOI: 10.1055/a-2497-6449
Inga Overesch, Ulrike Junius-Walker, Johanna Schneider, Mareike Wollenweber, Karina Usipbekova, Wiebke Böhne, Ina Holle, Johannes Dreesman, Elke Mertens, Sveja Eberhard
With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decreasing significance of official reporting figures, the Lower Saxony State Health Office developed and tested a new indicator: the "7-day sick leave incidence". Unlike previous surveillance indicators, it is intended for syndromic surveillance of COVID-19. This article explains the methodological development as well as its benefits, possible applications, and limitations.The indicator is based on the weekly number of sick leaves due to COVID-19 per 100,000 health insurance members entitled to sickness benefits (KGbM) of the AOK Lower Saxony (AOKN). The development of the indicator involved differentiating between initial and follow-up sick leaves, investigating fluctuations in the number of KGbM, analysing the doctors' assignments of ICD Codes U07.1! and U07.2!, and ensuring the timely availability of sick leave data.Initial and follow-up sick leaves were distinguished using a temporal algorithm. In 2022 and 2023, on average, 83.0% (s=5.4%) and 88.9% (s=2.3%) of all initial COVID-19-related sick notes were submitted on time by the end of the respective calendar week. Four out of 5 initial sick notes contained the doctors' ICD code U07.1! (lab-confirmed COVID-19). The number of KGbM proved to be stable (M=1.218.202, s=11.003). When comparing the new "7-day sick leave incidence" with the officially used "7-day incidence rates" during pandemic, trends were highly similar in 2022 (r=0.89), but diverged significantly in 2023 (r=0.26) due to declining diagnostic activities for the "7-day incidence rates".The new 7-day-sick-leave incidence is a good representation of the post-pandemic COVID-19 infection dynamics. The indicator uses routine data and is easy to establish. Limitations relate to possible changes in diagnostic procedures, doctors' coding behaviors and changing demands for sick leave.
{"title":"Piloting of a surveillance system for acute respiratory diseases: COVID-19 monitoring using Sick Leave Certificates.","authors":"Inga Overesch, Ulrike Junius-Walker, Johanna Schneider, Mareike Wollenweber, Karina Usipbekova, Wiebke Böhne, Ina Holle, Johannes Dreesman, Elke Mertens, Sveja Eberhard","doi":"10.1055/a-2497-6449","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2497-6449","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decreasing significance of official reporting figures, the Lower Saxony State Health Office developed and tested a new indicator: the \"7-day sick leave incidence\". Unlike previous surveillance indicators, it is intended for syndromic surveillance of COVID-19. This article explains the methodological development as well as its benefits, possible applications, and limitations.The indicator is based on the weekly number of sick leaves due to COVID-19 per 100,000 health insurance members entitled to sickness benefits (KGbM) of the AOK Lower Saxony (AOKN). The development of the indicator involved differentiating between initial and follow-up sick leaves, investigating fluctuations in the number of KGbM, analysing the doctors' assignments of ICD Codes U07.1! and U07.2!, and ensuring the timely availability of sick leave data.Initial and follow-up sick leaves were distinguished using a temporal algorithm. In 2022 and 2023, on average, 83.0% (s=5.4%) and 88.9% (s=2.3%) of all initial COVID-19-related sick notes were submitted on time by the end of the respective calendar week. Four out of 5 initial sick notes contained the doctors' ICD code U07.1! (lab-confirmed COVID-19). The number of KGbM proved to be stable (M=1.218.202, s=11.003). When comparing the new \"7-day sick leave incidence\" with the officially used \"7-day incidence rates\" during pandemic, trends were highly similar in 2022 (r=0.89), but diverged significantly in 2023 (r=0.26) due to declining diagnostic activities for the \"7-day incidence rates\".The new 7-day-sick-leave incidence is a good representation of the post-pandemic COVID-19 infection dynamics. The indicator uses routine data and is easy to establish. Limitations relate to possible changes in diagnostic procedures, doctors' coding behaviors and changing demands for sick leave.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"S365-S372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142792515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-01-22DOI: 10.1055/a-2522-5745
Simon Bettin, Marco Müller, Ines Weinhold, Leonie Zetzsch, Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage, Christian Elsner
The health economic impacts of centralization in the German healthcare system, particularly in the field of ENT, are insufficiently researched. Therefore, this study investigates the potential benefits of a head and neck tumor center using the example of surgical care for laryngeal carcinoma in Schleswig-Holstein.A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA search schema to examine the correlation between a hospital's treatment volume and mortality rates for laryngeal carcinomas. Subsequently, an 8-year Markov model simulation was employed to demonstrate the effects of establishing centers. This was supplemented by a cost analysis based on data from the PROGNOS study.The simulation shows the hypothetical impact on patient care for the existing head and neck tumor center in Schleswig-Holstein over an 8-year period. Maintaining the center in Schleswig-Holstein over eight years would save 113 lives and gain 1,333 life years (equivalent to 933.1 QALYs), corresponding to costs of 12,866 euros per QALY.The results suggest that centralizing care has medical and economic effectiveness in the ENT sector. They provide important insights for current political discussions and decision-making processes in healthcare. Future research should expand the focus to include other ENT cancers to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the impacts of centralization.
{"title":"[Health Economic Benefit Analysis of ENT Centers: Simulation-based analysis of centralization in laryngeal surgery using population data from Schleswig-Holstein, exemplified by laryngeal carcinoma].","authors":"Simon Bettin, Marco Müller, Ines Weinhold, Leonie Zetzsch, Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage, Christian Elsner","doi":"10.1055/a-2522-5745","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2522-5745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The health economic impacts of centralization in the German healthcare system, particularly in the field of ENT, are insufficiently researched. Therefore, this study investigates the potential benefits of a head and neck tumor center using the example of surgical care for laryngeal carcinoma in Schleswig-Holstein.A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA search schema to examine the correlation between a hospital's treatment volume and mortality rates for laryngeal carcinomas. Subsequently, an 8-year Markov model simulation was employed to demonstrate the effects of establishing centers. This was supplemented by a cost analysis based on data from the PROGNOS study.The simulation shows the hypothetical impact on patient care for the existing head and neck tumor center in Schleswig-Holstein over an 8-year period. Maintaining the center in Schleswig-Holstein over eight years would save 113 lives and gain 1,333 life years (equivalent to 933.1 QALYs), corresponding to costs of 12,866 euros per QALY.The results suggest that centralizing care has medical and economic effectiveness in the ENT sector. They provide important insights for current political discussions and decision-making processes in healthcare. Future research should expand the focus to include other ENT cancers to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the impacts of centralization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"777-784"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143025269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2024-07-15DOI: 10.1055/a-2365-9179
Simone Scheithauer, Julia Hoffmann, Caroline Lang, Diana Fenz, Milena Maria Berens, Antonia Milena Köster, Ivonne Panchyrz, Lorenz Harst, Kristina Adorjan, Christian Apfelbacher, Sandra Ciesek, Claudia Maria Denkinger, Christian Drosten, Max Geraedts, Ruth Hecker, Wolfgang Hoffmann, André Karch, Thea Koch, Dagmar Krefting, Klaus Lieb, Jörg J Meerpohl, Eva Annette Rehfuess, Nicole Skoetz, Saša Sopka, Thomas von Lengerke, HaukeFelix Wiegand, Jochen Schmitt
<p><p>Während einer Pandemie muss Resilienz nicht nur als Eigenschaft des Gesundheitssystems, sondern auch des umgebenden Forschungsumfelds betrachtet werden. Um verlässliche, evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen aus der Universitätsmedizin an die Gesundheitspolitik und die Entscheidungsträger bereitstellen zu können, müssen wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse schnell, integrativ und multidisziplinär generiert, synthetisiert und kommuniziert werden. Die Resilienz der öffentlichen Gesundheitssysteme und der Gesundheitsforschungssysteme sind somit eng verknüpft. Die Reaktion auf die SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie in Deutschland wurde jedoch durch das Fehlen einer adäquat vernetzten Gesundheitsforschungsinfrastruktur erschwert. Das Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin (NUM) wurde zu Beginn der Pandemie mit dem Ziel gegründet, Deutschland auf zukünftige Pandemien vorzubereiten. Ziel des Projektes "PREparedness and PAndemic REsponse in Deutschland (PREPARED)" ist es, ein ganzheitliches Konzept für eine kooperative, adaptierbare und nachhaltige Gesundheitsforschungsinfrastruktur innerhalb des NUM zu entwickeln und damit einen Beitrag zu einer umfassenden Pandemiebereitschaft zu leisten. Das vorgeschlagene Konzept dieser Infrastruktur vereint vier Kern- und drei Unterstützungsfunktionalitäten in vier verschiedenen Handlungsfeldern. Die Funktionalitäten gewährleisten im Falle zukünftiger Gesundheitskrisen ein effizientes Funktionieren des Gesundheitsforschungssystems und eine rasche Übertragung entsprechender Implikationen in andere Systeme. Die vier Handlungsfelder sind (a) Monitoring und Surveillance, (b) Synthese und Transfer, (c) Koordination und Organisation sowie (d) Kapazitäten und Ressourcen. Die sieben Funktionalitäten umfassen 1) eine Monitoring- und Surveillance-Einheit, 2) eine Pathogenkompetenz-Plattform, 3) Evidenzsynthese und vertrauenswürdige Empfehlungen, 4) eine Einheit zur regionalen Vernetzung und Implementierung, 5) eine Strategische Kommunikationseinheit, 6) Human Resources Management und 7) ein Rapid Reaction & Response (R<sup>3</sup>)-Cockpit. Die Governance wird als Kontroll- und Regulierungssystem eingerichtet, wobei agile Management-Methoden in interpandemischen Phasen trainiert werden, um die Reaktionsfähigkeit zu verbessern sowie die Eignung agiler Methoden für die wissenschaftliche Infrastruktur für die Pandemiebereitschaft zu untersuchen. Der Aufbau der PREPARED-Forschungsinfrastruktur muss vor der nächsten Pandemie erfolgen, da Training und regelmäßige Stresstests grundlegende Voraussetzungen für deren Funktionieren sind.During a pandemic, resilience must be considered not only as an attribute of the health care system, but also of the surrounding research environment. To provide reliable evidence-based advice from university medicine to health policy and decision makers, scientific evidence must be generated, synthesized and communicated in a rapid, integrative and multidisciplinary manner. The resilience of public health systems and the health research
{"title":"Pandemic Preparedness - A Proposal for a Research Infrastructure and its Functionalities for a Resilient Health Research System.","authors":"Simone Scheithauer, Julia Hoffmann, Caroline Lang, Diana Fenz, Milena Maria Berens, Antonia Milena Köster, Ivonne Panchyrz, Lorenz Harst, Kristina Adorjan, Christian Apfelbacher, Sandra Ciesek, Claudia Maria Denkinger, Christian Drosten, Max Geraedts, Ruth Hecker, Wolfgang Hoffmann, André Karch, Thea Koch, Dagmar Krefting, Klaus Lieb, Jörg J Meerpohl, Eva Annette Rehfuess, Nicole Skoetz, Saša Sopka, Thomas von Lengerke, HaukeFelix Wiegand, Jochen Schmitt","doi":"10.1055/a-2365-9179","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2365-9179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Während einer Pandemie muss Resilienz nicht nur als Eigenschaft des Gesundheitssystems, sondern auch des umgebenden Forschungsumfelds betrachtet werden. Um verlässliche, evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen aus der Universitätsmedizin an die Gesundheitspolitik und die Entscheidungsträger bereitstellen zu können, müssen wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse schnell, integrativ und multidisziplinär generiert, synthetisiert und kommuniziert werden. Die Resilienz der öffentlichen Gesundheitssysteme und der Gesundheitsforschungssysteme sind somit eng verknüpft. Die Reaktion auf die SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie in Deutschland wurde jedoch durch das Fehlen einer adäquat vernetzten Gesundheitsforschungsinfrastruktur erschwert. Das Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin (NUM) wurde zu Beginn der Pandemie mit dem Ziel gegründet, Deutschland auf zukünftige Pandemien vorzubereiten. Ziel des Projektes \"PREparedness and PAndemic REsponse in Deutschland (PREPARED)\" ist es, ein ganzheitliches Konzept für eine kooperative, adaptierbare und nachhaltige Gesundheitsforschungsinfrastruktur innerhalb des NUM zu entwickeln und damit einen Beitrag zu einer umfassenden Pandemiebereitschaft zu leisten. Das vorgeschlagene Konzept dieser Infrastruktur vereint vier Kern- und drei Unterstützungsfunktionalitäten in vier verschiedenen Handlungsfeldern. Die Funktionalitäten gewährleisten im Falle zukünftiger Gesundheitskrisen ein effizientes Funktionieren des Gesundheitsforschungssystems und eine rasche Übertragung entsprechender Implikationen in andere Systeme. Die vier Handlungsfelder sind (a) Monitoring und Surveillance, (b) Synthese und Transfer, (c) Koordination und Organisation sowie (d) Kapazitäten und Ressourcen. Die sieben Funktionalitäten umfassen 1) eine Monitoring- und Surveillance-Einheit, 2) eine Pathogenkompetenz-Plattform, 3) Evidenzsynthese und vertrauenswürdige Empfehlungen, 4) eine Einheit zur regionalen Vernetzung und Implementierung, 5) eine Strategische Kommunikationseinheit, 6) Human Resources Management und 7) ein Rapid Reaction & Response (R<sup>3</sup>)-Cockpit. Die Governance wird als Kontroll- und Regulierungssystem eingerichtet, wobei agile Management-Methoden in interpandemischen Phasen trainiert werden, um die Reaktionsfähigkeit zu verbessern sowie die Eignung agiler Methoden für die wissenschaftliche Infrastruktur für die Pandemiebereitschaft zu untersuchen. Der Aufbau der PREPARED-Forschungsinfrastruktur muss vor der nächsten Pandemie erfolgen, da Training und regelmäßige Stresstests grundlegende Voraussetzungen für deren Funktionieren sind.During a pandemic, resilience must be considered not only as an attribute of the health care system, but also of the surrounding research environment. To provide reliable evidence-based advice from university medicine to health policy and decision makers, scientific evidence must be generated, synthesized and communicated in a rapid, integrative and multidisciplinary manner. The resilience of public health systems and the health research","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"S334-S343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-21DOI: 10.1055/a-2635-4737
Jenny Schreiber, Christina Strauß, Anna Weidlich, Sarah Thober, Peter Schröder-Bäck
Between March 16th and December 31st 2022, compulsory vaccination against COVID-19 in medical and care facilities was legislated through § 20a of the Infection Protection Act. Until March 15th 2022, employees in medical and care facilities had to provide proof of completed vaccination against COVID-19, proof of recovery, or a medical certificate indicating that vaccination was not feasible. In case the deadline was not met, the facility management was obliged to report immediately to the local health authority, who proceeded with a discretionary decision. There was controversy about the law among politicians, health care workers, employees in public administration as well as in the media landscape and civil society. Federal states and local authorities implemented the law to varying degrees. This study describes the implementation of compulsory vaccination in medical and care facilities in detail for the district Hamburg Eimsbüttel and presents administrative, medical and ethical challenges of the law in its implementation.
{"title":"[Compulsory vaccination in health care facilities according to § 20a Infection Protection Act: Administrative, medical and ethical considerations of its implementation in Hamburg Eimsbüttel].","authors":"Jenny Schreiber, Christina Strauß, Anna Weidlich, Sarah Thober, Peter Schröder-Bäck","doi":"10.1055/a-2635-4737","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2635-4737","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between March 16th and December 31st 2022, compulsory vaccination against COVID-19 in medical and care facilities was legislated through § 20a of the Infection Protection Act. Until March 15th 2022, employees in medical and care facilities had to provide proof of completed vaccination against COVID-19, proof of recovery, or a medical certificate indicating that vaccination was not feasible. In case the deadline was not met, the facility management was obliged to report immediately to the local health authority, who proceeded with a discretionary decision. There was controversy about the law among politicians, health care workers, employees in public administration as well as in the media landscape and civil society. Federal states and local authorities implemented the law to varying degrees. This study describes the implementation of compulsory vaccination in medical and care facilities in detail for the district Hamburg Eimsbüttel and presents administrative, medical and ethical challenges of the law in its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"758-766"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-02-26DOI: 10.1055/a-2547-2719
Maike Schröder, Holger Hassel, Birgit Babitsch
Community readiness (CR) describes the degree to which a municipality is prepared to actively address a health problem. It is a central condition for successful and sustainable prevention efforts. The CR for childhood obesity prevention is low in German municipalities, which makes it difficult to implement effective measures.The aim of this study was to develop strategies to increase CR for the prevention of childhood obesity in municipalities. In Bavarian municipalities, workshops (n=5) were conducted with municipal stakeholders after an initial CR assessment. Their specific results were analysed and based on this, strategies were developed in a participatory manner.The municipal strategies focused on three areas: (1) optimising resources for prevention efforts, (2) supporting knowledge about childhood obesity and prevention and (3) strengthening prioritisation of childhood obesity.The strategies offer practical approaches to promote CR and provide a basis for further development and implementation of effective prevention efforts. An evaluation of effectiveness can be made through follow-up measurements after implementation of the strategies.
{"title":"[Prevention of childhood obesity: participatory development of municipal strategies to increase community readiness].","authors":"Maike Schröder, Holger Hassel, Birgit Babitsch","doi":"10.1055/a-2547-2719","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2547-2719","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community readiness (CR) describes the degree to which a municipality is prepared to actively address a health problem. It is a central condition for successful and sustainable prevention efforts. The CR for childhood obesity prevention is low in German municipalities, which makes it difficult to implement effective measures.The aim of this study was to develop strategies to increase CR for the prevention of childhood obesity in municipalities. In Bavarian municipalities, workshops (n=5) were conducted with municipal stakeholders after an initial CR assessment. Their specific results were analysed and based on this, strategies were developed in a participatory manner.The municipal strategies focused on three areas: (1) optimising resources for prevention efforts, (2) supporting knowledge about childhood obesity and prevention and (3) strengthening prioritisation of childhood obesity.The strategies offer practical approaches to promote CR and provide a basis for further development and implementation of effective prevention efforts. An evaluation of effectiveness can be made through follow-up measurements after implementation of the strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"724-731"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143517025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-03DOI: 10.1055/a-2735-3562
Enno Swart, Jelena Epping, Holger Gothe, Peter Ihle
{"title":"Editorial.","authors":"Enno Swart, Jelena Epping, Holger Gothe, Peter Ihle","doi":"10.1055/a-2735-3562","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2735-3562","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":"87 12","pages":"712-714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-08DOI: 10.1055/a-2624-0160
Vinzenz Völkel, Michael Gerken, Kees Kleihues-van Tol, Olaf Schoffer, Veronika Bierbaum, Christoph Bobeth, Martin Roessler, Torsten Blum, Frank Griesinger, Christian Günster, Judith Hansinger, Jochen Schmitt, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Lung cancer represents the second most frequent tumor entity worldwide with an increasing number of patients treated in specialized centers. The aim of the WiZen study was to find out whether treatment at hospitals certified by the German Cancer Society (GCS) was associated with long-term survival benefits.Data for this cohort study was derived from the largest German statutory health insurance (SHI) AOK, four regional population-based clinical cancer registries (CCR), and standardized hospital quality reports. The analyses were based on 173,999 incident lung cancer patients in the SHI dataset and 35,702 patients in the CCR dataset who received primary treatment for lung cancer (ICD-10-GM C33, C34, D38.1) between 2009 and 2017.Distributions of age, sex, comorbidities, and most tumor characteristics were similar among patients treated in certified and non-certified hospitals. The Kaplan-Meier estimator for 5-year overall survival was 28.0% for patients from certified and 16.9% from non-certified hospitals (SHI data; CCR data: 21.4% vs. 13.6%). Cox-regression adjusting for relevant confounders yielded hazard ratios of 0.97 (SHI data; 95%CI 0.94, 1.00) and 0.85 (CCR data; 95%CI 0.82, 0.88) for all-cause mortality. The adjusted hazard ratio for recurrence-free survival (CCR data, UICC stage I-III, R0 only) was 0.82 (95%CI 0.75, 0.90).The presented analyses show that treatment in certified lung cancer centers is associated with relevant survival benefits and should therefore be supported.
{"title":"Long-term survival after treatment in certified lung cancer centers and not certified hospitals: Results of a large German cohort study using clinical routine data.","authors":"Vinzenz Völkel, Michael Gerken, Kees Kleihues-van Tol, Olaf Schoffer, Veronika Bierbaum, Christoph Bobeth, Martin Roessler, Torsten Blum, Frank Griesinger, Christian Günster, Judith Hansinger, Jochen Schmitt, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke","doi":"10.1055/a-2624-0160","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2624-0160","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer represents the second most frequent tumor entity worldwide with an increasing number of patients treated in specialized centers. The aim of the WiZen study was to find out whether treatment at hospitals certified by the German Cancer Society (GCS) was associated with long-term survival benefits.Data for this cohort study was derived from the largest German statutory health insurance (SHI) AOK, four regional population-based clinical cancer registries (CCR), and standardized hospital quality reports. The analyses were based on 173,999 incident lung cancer patients in the SHI dataset and 35,702 patients in the CCR dataset who received primary treatment for lung cancer (ICD-10-GM C33, C34, D38.1) between 2009 and 2017.Distributions of age, sex, comorbidities, and most tumor characteristics were similar among patients treated in certified and non-certified hospitals. The Kaplan-Meier estimator for 5-year overall survival was 28.0% for patients from certified and 16.9% from non-certified hospitals (SHI data; CCR data: 21.4% vs. 13.6%). Cox-regression adjusting for relevant confounders yielded hazard ratios of 0.97 (SHI data; 95%CI 0.94, 1.00) and 0.85 (CCR data; 95%CI 0.82, 0.88) for all-cause mortality. The adjusted hazard ratio for recurrence-free survival (CCR data, UICC stage I-III, R0 only) was 0.82 (95%CI 0.75, 0.90).The presented analyses show that treatment in certified lung cancer centers is associated with relevant survival benefits and should therefore be supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"S373-S382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-02-03DOI: 10.1055/a-2486-6430
Benedikt Selbertinger, David Rothfuß, Maria Hatzipanagiotou, Angela Köninger, Christian Apfelbacher, Michael Kabesch, Susanne Brandstetter
The aim of this study was to describe and analyse knowledge of women in childbed with and without a migration background about ante- and postnatal support services.Questionnaires were provided in 26 languages. In a cross-sectional survey, 641 women answered questions about their knowledge of 11 different regional support services, and information sources for these and other support service providers. Median split was used to derive mothers with good and poor knowledge.German was not the mother tongue of 30% of the participants (n=194) and were therefore defined as "mothers with migration background". Of these, 83% (n=161) were aware of services offered by midwives and<40% knew of other support services. Women with migration background were significantly less likely to know the support services (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.23), even after controlling for other sociodemographic variables. Furthermore, they obtained significantly less frequently information about relevant services from gynaecologists, midwives, relatives/acquaintances or by themselves.Especially for mothers with migration background, knowledge about ante- and postnatal support services must be made more accessible. In this, midwives could play a decisive role.
{"title":"[Mothers with migration background have significantly less knowledge of ante- and postnatal support services than mothers without migration background: cross-sectional survey in two maternity hospitals].","authors":"Benedikt Selbertinger, David Rothfuß, Maria Hatzipanagiotou, Angela Köninger, Christian Apfelbacher, Michael Kabesch, Susanne Brandstetter","doi":"10.1055/a-2486-6430","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2486-6430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to describe and analyse knowledge of women in childbed with and without a migration background about ante- and postnatal support services.Questionnaires were provided in 26 languages. In a cross-sectional survey, 641 women answered questions about their knowledge of 11 different regional support services, and information sources for these and other support service providers. Median split was used to derive mothers with good and poor knowledge.German was not the mother tongue of 30% of the participants (n=194) and were therefore defined as \"mothers with migration background\". Of these, 83% (n=161) were aware of services offered by midwives and<40% knew of other support services. Women with migration background were significantly less likely to know the support services (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.23), even after controlling for other sociodemographic variables. Furthermore, they obtained significantly less frequently information about relevant services from gynaecologists, midwives, relatives/acquaintances or by themselves.Especially for mothers with migration background, knowledge about ante- and postnatal support services must be made more accessible. In this, midwives could play a decisive role.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"715-723"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143123753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}