首页 > 最新文献

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Trends in coronary artery disease mortality among adults with diabetes: Insights from CDC WONDER (1999-2020). 成人糖尿病患者冠心病死亡率趋势:来自美国疾病预防控制中心 WONDER(1999-2020 年)的启示。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.002
Muhammad Abdullah Naveed, Ahila Ali, Sivaram Neppala, Faizan Ahmed, Palak Patel, Bazil Azeem, Muhammad Omer Rehan, Rabia Iqbal, Manahil Mubeen, Ayman Fath, Timir Paul

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant cause of mortality among US adults. This study investigates trends in CAD-related mortality in adults aged 25 and older with DM, focusing on geographic, gender, and racial/ethnic disparities from 1999 to 2020.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using death certificate data from the CDC WONDER database from 1999 to 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs), annual percent change (APC), and average annual percentage change (AAPC) were calculated per 100,000 persons, stratified by year, sex, race/ethnicity, and geographical region.

Results: CAD in DM accounted for 1,462,279 deaths among US adults aged 25+. Most deaths occurred in medical facilities (44.2 %) and at home (29.3 %). The overall AAMR for CAD in DM-related deaths decreased from 36.3 in 1999 to 31.7 in 2020, with an AAPC of -0.96 (95 % CI: -1.29 to -0.77, p < 0.000001). Men had higher AAMRs (41.6) compared to women (22.6), with a more significant decrease in women (AAPC: -2.10, p < 0.000001) than in men (AAPC: -0.34, p = 0.001200). Racial/ethnic disparities showed the highest AAMRs in American Indians/Alaska Natives (43.6), followed by Blacks (37.8), Hispanics (33.8), Whites (29.7), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (22.5). The most significant decrease was in Hispanics (AAPC: -1.64, p < 0.000001). Geographically, AAMRs ranged from 13.7 in Nevada to 51.3 in West Virginia, with the highest mortality observed in the Midwest (AAMR: 34.5). Nonmetropolitan areas exhibited higher AAMRs (35.2) than metropolitan areas (29.7), with a more pronounced decrease in metropolitan areas (AAPC: -1.22, p < 0.000001) compared to nonmetropolitan areas (AAPC: -0.03, p = 0.854629).

Conclusion: The notable increase in mortality rates associated with CAD among patients with DM from 2018 to 2020 presents a substantial concern that necessitates targeted public health interventions to ensure equitable access to cardiovascular care.

背景:糖尿病(DM)并发冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是导致美国成年人死亡的一个重要原因。本研究调查了 1999 年至 2020 年 25 岁及以上患有糖尿病的成年人中与冠状动脉疾病相关的死亡率趋势,重点关注地域、性别和种族/民族差异:方法: 使用疾病预防控制中心 WONDER 数据库中 1999 年至 2020 年的死亡证明数据进行了回顾性分析。按年份、性别、种族/人种和地理区域分层,计算每 10 万人的年龄调整死亡率 (AAMRs)、年百分比变化 (APC) 和年平均百分比变化 (AAPC):在美国 25 岁以上的成年人中,因糖尿病引发的 CAD 死亡人数为 1,462,279 人。大多数死亡发生在医疗机构(44.2%)和家中(29.3%)。与糖尿病相关的 CAD 死亡的总体 AAMR 从 1999 年的 36.3 降至 2020 年的 31.7,AAPC 为-0.96(95 % CI:-1.29 至-0.77,p 结论):从 2018 年到 2020 年,DM 患者中与 CAD 相关的死亡率明显上升,这引起了人们的极大关注,有必要采取有针对性的公共卫生干预措施,以确保公平地获得心血管护理。
{"title":"Trends in coronary artery disease mortality among adults with diabetes: Insights from CDC WONDER (1999-2020).","authors":"Muhammad Abdullah Naveed, Ahila Ali, Sivaram Neppala, Faizan Ahmed, Palak Patel, Bazil Azeem, Muhammad Omer Rehan, Rabia Iqbal, Manahil Mubeen, Ayman Fath, Timir Paul","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant cause of mortality among US adults. This study investigates trends in CAD-related mortality in adults aged 25 and older with DM, focusing on geographic, gender, and racial/ethnic disparities from 1999 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using death certificate data from the CDC WONDER database from 1999 to 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs), annual percent change (APC), and average annual percentage change (AAPC) were calculated per 100,000 persons, stratified by year, sex, race/ethnicity, and geographical region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAD in DM accounted for 1,462,279 deaths among US adults aged 25+. Most deaths occurred in medical facilities (44.2 %) and at home (29.3 %). The overall AAMR for CAD in DM-related deaths decreased from 36.3 in 1999 to 31.7 in 2020, with an AAPC of -0.96 (95 % CI: -1.29 to -0.77, p < 0.000001). Men had higher AAMRs (41.6) compared to women (22.6), with a more significant decrease in women (AAPC: -2.10, p < 0.000001) than in men (AAPC: -0.34, p = 0.001200). Racial/ethnic disparities showed the highest AAMRs in American Indians/Alaska Natives (43.6), followed by Blacks (37.8), Hispanics (33.8), Whites (29.7), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (22.5). The most significant decrease was in Hispanics (AAPC: -1.64, p < 0.000001). Geographically, AAMRs ranged from 13.7 in Nevada to 51.3 in West Virginia, with the highest mortality observed in the Midwest (AAMR: 34.5). Nonmetropolitan areas exhibited higher AAMRs (35.2) than metropolitan areas (29.7), with a more pronounced decrease in metropolitan areas (AAPC: -1.22, p < 0.000001) compared to nonmetropolitan areas (AAPC: -0.03, p = 0.854629).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The notable increase in mortality rates associated with CAD among patients with DM from 2018 to 2020 presents a substantial concern that necessitates targeted public health interventions to ensure equitable access to cardiovascular care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding long-term risk in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in the Australian contemporary era with a focus on defining Complex Revascularisation in High-Risk Indicated Patients (CHIP). 了解澳大利亚当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的长期风险,重点关注高危适应症患者复杂血管重建术(CHIP)的定义。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.001
Julian Yeoh, Garry W Hamilton, Diem Dinh, Angela Brennan, Christopher M Reid, Dion Stub, Melaine Freeman, Martin Sebastian, Ernesto Oqueli, Andrew Ajani, Tim Scully, Liam Toner, Sandra Picardo, Mark Horrigan, Matias B Yudi, Omar Farouque, Siven Seevanayagam, David J Clark

Background: Complex Revascularisation in High-Risk Indicated Patients (CHIP) is emerging in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). We document the frequency and outcomes following CHIP PCI in the Australian population, to understand risk and guide clinical decision-making. We propose a scoring system to define CHIP procedures.

Methods: Patients undergoing PCI from Melbourne Intervention Group registry between 2005 and 2018 were analysed. Patients were stratified based on the number of high-risk features defined as 1)presence of ≥3 patient factors including age > 75yo, COPD, diabetes, renal impairment (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2), PVD, and 2)LVEF<30 %, and/or 3)having one complex coronary anatomical feature such as LMCA PCI, ACC/AHA B2/C lesion PCI, presence of multi-vessel disease or CTO PCI. National Death Index linkage was performed for long-term mortality analysis. Outcomes were analysed according to 4 risk categories - low risk(score 0), intermediate risk(score 1), high-risk(score 2), and very high-risk(score 3).

Results: 20,973patients were analysed. Majority of patients underwent intermediate-risk procedures(71.7 %), with low rates of high-risk(6.6 %), and very high-risk(0.2 %). Lesion success inversely correlates with risk; low-risk(99.4 %), intermediate-risk(95.1 %), high-risk(94.3 %), very high-risk(92.5 %),p < 0.001. In-hospital and 30-day death correlates with risk; low-risk(0.0 %/0.1 %), intermediate-risk(0.3 %/0.5 %), high-risk(1.5 %/2.9 %), very high-risk(2.4 %/7.1 %),p < 0.001. Long-term mortality correlates with risk; low-risk(12.3 %), intermediate-risk(15.8 %), high-risk(49.3 %), very high-risk(76.2 %),p < 0.001. On multivariate analysis, increasing risk correlates with long-term mortality; intermediate-risk(HR1.41), high-risk(HR6.42), and very high-risk(14.05).

Conclusion: In the Australian practice, proportion of patients undergoing high and very high-risk PCI procedures are low. Despite good procedural success and in-hospital outcomes, long-term mortality is poor. Further research into appropriate patient selection, and direct comparison of CHIP PCI to those treated medically and surgically should be considered.

背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中出现了高危适应症患者复杂血管重建术(CHIP)。我们记录了澳大利亚人群中CHIP PCI的频率和结果,以了解风险并指导临床决策。我们提出了一个评分系统来定义CHIP手术:分析了 2005 年至 2018 年期间墨尔本干预小组登记处接受 PCI 治疗的患者。根据高危特征的数量对患者进行分层,高危特征定义为:1)存在≥3个患者因素,包括年龄大于75岁、慢性阻塞性肺病、糖尿病、肾功能损害(eGFRR结果:分析了20973名患者。大多数患者接受了中危手术(71.7%),高危(6.6%)和极高危(0.2%)比例较低。病变成功率与风险成反比:低风险(99.4%)、中度风险(95.1%)、高风险(94.3%)和极高风险(92.5%):在澳大利亚,接受高风险和极高风险 PCI 手术的患者比例较低。尽管手术成功率和院内疗效良好,但长期死亡率较低。应考虑进一步研究如何选择合适的患者,并将CHIP PCI与药物和手术治疗的患者进行直接比较。
{"title":"Understanding long-term risk in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in the Australian contemporary era with a focus on defining Complex Revascularisation in High-Risk Indicated Patients (CHIP).","authors":"Julian Yeoh, Garry W Hamilton, Diem Dinh, Angela Brennan, Christopher M Reid, Dion Stub, Melaine Freeman, Martin Sebastian, Ernesto Oqueli, Andrew Ajani, Tim Scully, Liam Toner, Sandra Picardo, Mark Horrigan, Matias B Yudi, Omar Farouque, Siven Seevanayagam, David J Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex Revascularisation in High-Risk Indicated Patients (CHIP) is emerging in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). We document the frequency and outcomes following CHIP PCI in the Australian population, to understand risk and guide clinical decision-making. We propose a scoring system to define CHIP procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing PCI from Melbourne Intervention Group registry between 2005 and 2018 were analysed. Patients were stratified based on the number of high-risk features defined as 1)presence of ≥3 patient factors including age > 75yo, COPD, diabetes, renal impairment (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2), PVD, and 2)LVEF<30 %, and/or 3)having one complex coronary anatomical feature such as LMCA PCI, ACC/AHA B2/C lesion PCI, presence of multi-vessel disease or CTO PCI. National Death Index linkage was performed for long-term mortality analysis. Outcomes were analysed according to 4 risk categories - low risk(score 0), intermediate risk(score 1), high-risk(score 2), and very high-risk(score 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20,973patients were analysed. Majority of patients underwent intermediate-risk procedures(71.7 %), with low rates of high-risk(6.6 %), and very high-risk(0.2 %). Lesion success inversely correlates with risk; low-risk(99.4 %), intermediate-risk(95.1 %), high-risk(94.3 %), very high-risk(92.5 %),p < 0.001. In-hospital and 30-day death correlates with risk; low-risk(0.0 %/0.1 %), intermediate-risk(0.3 %/0.5 %), high-risk(1.5 %/2.9 %), very high-risk(2.4 %/7.1 %),p < 0.001. Long-term mortality correlates with risk; low-risk(12.3 %), intermediate-risk(15.8 %), high-risk(49.3 %), very high-risk(76.2 %),p < 0.001. On multivariate analysis, increasing risk correlates with long-term mortality; intermediate-risk(HR1.41), high-risk(HR6.42), and very high-risk(14.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the Australian practice, proportion of patients undergoing high and very high-risk PCI procedures are low. Despite good procedural success and in-hospital outcomes, long-term mortality is poor. Further research into appropriate patient selection, and direct comparison of CHIP PCI to those treated medically and surgically should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Five-year clinical outcomes of STEMI patients treated with a pre-specified bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation technique: Final results of the BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT. 采用预先指定的生物可吸收血管支架植入技术治疗 STEMI 患者的五年临床疗效:BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT 的最终结果。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.003
Elisabetta Moscarella, Gianluca Campo, Massimo Leoncini, Salvatore Geraci, Elisa Nicolini, Bernardo Cortese, Bruno Loi, Vincenzo Guiducci, Salvatore Saccà, Attilio Varricchio, Paolo Vicinelli, Gianfranco De Candia, Davide Personeni, Paolo Calabrò, Salvatore Brugaletta, Azeem Latib, Maurizio Tespili, Alfonso Ielasi

Background: Data on Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) use in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. Furthermore, Absorb studies including STEMI patients lacked a prespecified implantation technique to optimize BVS deployment. This study examines the 5-year outcomes of BVS in STEMI patients using an optimized implantation strategy and the impact of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

Methods: The BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT study is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm multicenter trial (NCT02601781). It involved 505 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a predefined BVS implantation protocol. Key endpoints were a 5-year device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). The study also compared outcomes based on DAPT duration (36 months vs. shorter).

Results: 502 (99.4 %) patients completed the 5-year follow-up. DOCE rate was 2.4 %. ID-TLR, TV-MI, and cardiac death rates were 1.6 %, 0.8 %, and 0.6 %, respectively. No DOCE occurred between three and five years. Scaffold thrombosis (ScT) was 1 %, all occurring within 24 months. Longer-term DAPT significantly reduced DOCE (1.3 % vs. 4.3 %; HR: 0.29; 95 % CI: 0.1-0.9; p = 0.03) driven by a lower rate of TV-MI (0 % vs. 2.2 %; p = 0.018) compared to shorter-term DAPT, as well as ScT (0 % vs 2.7 %, p = 0.007).

Conclusions: This study shows favorable 5-year outcomes for BVS in selected STEMI patients with an optimized implantation strategy. Prolonged DAPT further improved outcomes, emphasizing its role in reducing adverse events during scaffold resorption. Further research is needed to assess newer-generation bioresorbable devices.

背景:在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中使用Absorb生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)的数据有限。此外,包括 STEMI 患者在内的 Absorb 研究缺乏用于优化 BVS 部署的预设植入技术。本研究探讨了 STEMI 患者使用优化植入策略的 BVS 5 年疗效以及延长双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT)的影响:BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT 研究是一项前瞻性、非随机、单臂多中心试验(NCT02601781)。505 名 STEMI 患者接受了预定义 BVS 植入方案的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。关键终点是心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死(TV-MI)和缺血驱动靶病变血运重建(ID-TLR)的5年设备导向复合终点(DOCE)。研究还比较了 DAPT 持续时间(36 个月与更短)的结果:502名患者(99.4%)完成了5年随访。DOCE率为2.4%。ID-TLR、TV-MI和心源性死亡发生率分别为1.6%、0.8%和0.6%。三至五年内未发生 DOCE。支架血栓 (ScT) 发生率为 1%,均发生在 24 个月内。与短期DAPT相比,长期DAPT可显著降低DOCE(1.3% vs. 4.3%;HR:0.29;95 % CI:0.1-0.9;p = 0.03),原因是TV-MI(0% vs. 2.2%;p = 0.018)和ScT(0% vs. 2.7%,p = 0.007)发生率较低:本研究显示,在选定的 STEMI 患者中,采用优化植入策略进行 BVS 治疗的 5 年预后良好。延长 DAPT 进一步改善了预后,强调了其在减少支架再吸收期间不良事件方面的作用。评估新一代生物可吸收装置还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Five-year clinical outcomes of STEMI patients treated with a pre-specified bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation technique: Final results of the BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT.","authors":"Elisabetta Moscarella, Gianluca Campo, Massimo Leoncini, Salvatore Geraci, Elisa Nicolini, Bernardo Cortese, Bruno Loi, Vincenzo Guiducci, Salvatore Saccà, Attilio Varricchio, Paolo Vicinelli, Gianfranco De Candia, Davide Personeni, Paolo Calabrò, Salvatore Brugaletta, Azeem Latib, Maurizio Tespili, Alfonso Ielasi","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) use in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. Furthermore, Absorb studies including STEMI patients lacked a prespecified implantation technique to optimize BVS deployment. This study examines the 5-year outcomes of BVS in STEMI patients using an optimized implantation strategy and the impact of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT study is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm multicenter trial (NCT02601781). It involved 505 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a predefined BVS implantation protocol. Key endpoints were a 5-year device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). The study also compared outcomes based on DAPT duration (36 months vs. shorter).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>502 (99.4 %) patients completed the 5-year follow-up. DOCE rate was 2.4 %. ID-TLR, TV-MI, and cardiac death rates were 1.6 %, 0.8 %, and 0.6 %, respectively. No DOCE occurred between three and five years. Scaffold thrombosis (ScT) was 1 %, all occurring within 24 months. Longer-term DAPT significantly reduced DOCE (1.3 % vs. 4.3 %; HR: 0.29; 95 % CI: 0.1-0.9; p = 0.03) driven by a lower rate of TV-MI (0 % vs. 2.2 %; p = 0.018) compared to shorter-term DAPT, as well as ScT (0 % vs 2.7 %, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows favorable 5-year outcomes for BVS in selected STEMI patients with an optimized implantation strategy. Prolonged DAPT further improved outcomes, emphasizing its role in reducing adverse events during scaffold resorption. Further research is needed to assess newer-generation bioresorbable devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcarotid versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis 经颈动脉与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.008
Cyrus Munguti , Paul M. Ndunda , Abdullah Abukar , Mohammed Abdel Jawad , Mohinder R. Vindhyal , Zaher Fanari

Background

In the 2021 Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) registry, 8.9 % of patients underwent TAVR via access sites other than the femoral artery. Transthoracic approaches may be contraindicated in some patients and may be associated with poorer outcomes. Therefore other alternative access routes are increasingly being performed. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TC-TAVR) and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of TC-TAVR and other access routes.

Methods

We comprehensively searched for controlled randomized and non-randomized studies from 4 online databases. We presented data using risk ratios (95 % confidence intervals) and measured heterogeneity using Higgins' I2.

Results

Sixteen observational studies on transcarotid TAVR were included in the analysis; 4 studies compared TC-TAVR vs TF-TAVR. The mean age and STS score for patients undergoing TC-TAVR were 80 years and 7.6 respectively. For TF-TAVR patients, mean age and STS score were 81.2 years and 6.5 respectively. There was no difference between patients undergoing TC-TAVR and TF-TAVR in the following 30-day outcomes: MACE [8.4 % vs 6.7 %; OR 1.32 (95 % CI 0.71–2.46 p = 0.38) I2 = 0 %], mortality [5.6 % vs 4.0 %; OR 0.42 (95 % CI 0.60–3.37, P = 0.42) I2 = 0 %] and stroke [0.7 % vs 2.3 %; OR 0.49 (95 % CI 0.09–2.56, P = 0.40) I2 = 0 %]. There was no difference in 30-day major vascular complications [0.7 % vs 3 %; OR 0.55 (95 % CI 0.06–5.29, P = 0.61) I2 = 39 %], major bleeding [0.7 % vs 3.8 %; OR 0.39 (95 % CI 0.09–1.67, P = 0.21) I2 = 0 %], and moderate or severe aortic valve regurgitation [8.6 % vs 9.9 %; OR 0.89 (95 % CI 0.48–1.65, P = 0.72) I2 = 0 %].

Conclusion

There are no significant differences in mortality, stroke MACE and major or life-threatening bleeding or vascular complications when TC-TAVR is compared to TF-TAVR approaches.
背景:在2021年经导管瓣膜治疗(TVT)登记中,8.9%的患者通过股动脉以外的入路接受了TAVR。经胸入路可能是某些患者的禁忌症,而且可能与较差的治疗效果有关。因此,越来越多的患者选择其他途径进行治疗。我们对经颈动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TC-TAVR)的文献进行了系统性回顾,并对TC-TAVR和其他入路的疗效进行了荟萃分析:我们从 4 个在线数据库中全面检索了对照随机和非随机研究。我们使用风险比(95% 置信区间)来展示数据,并使用 Higgins'I2 来衡量异质性:16项关于经颈动脉TAVR的观察性研究被纳入分析;4项研究比较了TC-TAVR与TF-TAVR。接受TC-TAVR的患者的平均年龄和STS评分分别为80岁和7.6分。TF-TAVR患者的平均年龄和STS评分分别为81.2岁和6.5分。接受TC-TAVR和TF-TAVR的患者在以下30天结果方面没有差异:MACE [8.4 % vs 6.7 %; OR 1.32 (95 % CI 0.71-2.46 P = 0.38) I2 = 0 %]、死亡率[5.6 % vs 4.0 %; OR 0.42 (95 % CI 0.60-3.37, P = 0.42) I2 = 0 %]和中风[0.7 % vs 2.3 %; OR 0.49 (95 % CI 0.09-2.56, P = 0.40) I2 = 0 %]。30 天主要血管并发症[0.7 % vs 3 %; OR 0.55 (95 % CI 0.06-5.29, P = 0.61) I2 = 39 %]、大出血[0.7 % vs 3.8 %; OR 0.39 (95 % CI 0.09-1.67, P = 0.21) I2 = 0 %]、中度或重度主动脉瓣反流[8.6 % vs 9.9 %; OR 0.89 (95 % CI 0.48-1.65, P = 0.72) I2 = 0 %]:结论:TC-TAVR与TF-TAVR相比,在死亡率、中风MACE、大出血或危及生命的出血或血管并发症方面没有明显差异。
{"title":"Transcarotid versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Cyrus Munguti ,&nbsp;Paul M. Ndunda ,&nbsp;Abdullah Abukar ,&nbsp;Mohammed Abdel Jawad ,&nbsp;Mohinder R. Vindhyal ,&nbsp;Zaher Fanari","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the 2021 Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) registry, 8.9 % of patients underwent TAVR via access sites other than the femoral artery. Transthoracic approaches may be contraindicated in some patients and may be associated with poorer outcomes. Therefore other alternative access routes are increasingly being performed. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TC-TAVR) and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of TC-TAVR and other access routes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We comprehensively searched for controlled randomized and non-randomized studies from 4 online databases. We presented data using risk ratios (95 % confidence intervals) and measured heterogeneity using Higgins' I<sup>2</sup>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen observational studies on transcarotid TAVR were included in the analysis; 4 studies compared TC-TAVR vs TF-TAVR. The mean age and STS score for patients undergoing TC-TAVR were 80 years and 7.6 respectively. For TF-TAVR patients, mean age and STS score were 81.2 years and 6.5 respectively. There was no difference between patients undergoing TC-TAVR and TF-TAVR in the following 30-day outcomes: MACE [8.4 % vs 6.7 %; OR 1.32 (95 % CI 0.71–2.46 <em>p</em> = 0.38) I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %], mortality [5.6 % vs 4.0 %; OR 0.42 (95 % CI 0.60–3.37, <em>P</em> = 0.42) I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %] and stroke [0.7 % vs 2.3 %; OR 0.49 (95 % CI 0.09–2.56, <em>P</em> = 0.40) I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %]. There was no difference in 30-day major vascular complications [0.7 % vs 3 %; OR 0.55 (95 % CI 0.06–5.29, <em>P</em> = 0.61) I<sup>2</sup> = 39 %], major bleeding [0.7 % vs 3.8 %; OR 0.39 (95 % CI 0.09–1.67, <em>P</em> = 0.21) I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %], and moderate or severe aortic valve regurgitation [8.6 % vs 9.9 %; OR 0.89 (95 % CI 0.48–1.65, <em>P</em> = 0.72) I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There are no significant differences in mortality, stroke MACE and major or life-threatening bleeding or vascular complications when TC-TAVR is compared to TF-TAVR approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 92-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of coronary artery disease and revascularization on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis 冠状动脉疾病和血管重建对经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄疗效的影响。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.003
Yoshiyuki Yamashita , Serge Sicouri , Massimo Baudo , Aleksander Dokollari , Roberto Rodriguez , Eric M. Gnall , Paul M. Coady , Harish Jarrett , Sandra V. Abramson , Katie M. Hawthorne , Scott M. Goldman , William A. Gray , Basel Ramlawi

Background/purpose

To evaluate the impact of coronary artery disease (CAD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary lesion complexity on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis.

Methods/materials

This retrospective study included 1042 patients divided into two groups by the presence or absence of CAD (SYNTAX score 0, no history of revascularization). Propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups. The effect of PCI, SYNTAX score, and residual SYNTAX score was also analyzed.

Results

The median age of the cohort was 82 years, and 641 patients had CAD. After propensity score matching, 346 pairs were analyzed. During 5 years of follow-up (median: 25, range 0–72 months), the rate of coronary intervention was significantly higher in CAD patients (p = 0.018). However, all-cause mortality, composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and coronary intervention, and overt bleeding defined by VARC-3 were comparable. After stratification, in patients with creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl, CAD was associated with a worse composite outcome (p = 0.016). Neither PCI nor SYNTAX score was associated with all-cause mortality in CAD patients. Similarly, residual SYNTAX score showed no association with mortality in patients undergoing PCI (all p values >0.7). PCI did not reach a significant difference in overt bleeding in CAD patients (adjusted p = 0.06).

Conclusions

Despite a higher incidence of coronary interventions, major clinical outcomes were similar between patients with and without CAD after TAVR. In patients with chronic kidney disease, CAD may be associated with an adverse composite outcome. Neither PCI nor SYNTAX/residual SYNTAX score influenced all-cause mortality.
背景/目的:评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉病变复杂性对主动脉瓣狭窄经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)疗效的影响:这项回顾性研究纳入了 1042 名患者,按照是否存在 CAD(SYNTAX 评分 0,无血管再通史)分为两组。采用倾向评分匹配法对两组患者进行比较。同时还分析了PCI、SYNTAX评分和残余SYNTAX评分的影响:结果:组群的中位年龄为 82 岁,641 名患者患有 CAD。经过倾向评分匹配后,对 346 对患者进行了分析。在 5 年的随访期间(中位数:25,范围 0-72 个月),CAD 患者的冠状动脉介入率明显更高(p = 0.018)。然而,全因死亡率、全因死亡率、中风和冠状动脉介入治疗的复合死亡率以及 VARC-3 定义的明显出血率却相当。经过分层后,在肌酐≥1.5 mg/dl 的患者中,CAD 与较差的综合预后相关(p = 0.016)。PCI和SYNTAX评分均与CAD患者的全因死亡率无关。同样,残余 SYNTAX 评分与接受 PCI 患者的死亡率也没有关系(所有 p 值均大于 0.7)。PCI与CAD患者的明显出血没有明显差异(调整后P = 0.06):结论:尽管冠状动脉介入治疗的发生率较高,但TAVR术后有CAD和无CAD患者的主要临床结果相似。在慢性肾脏病患者中,CAD可能与不良的综合结果有关。PCI和SYNTAX/剩余SYNTAX评分均不影响全因死亡率。
{"title":"Impact of coronary artery disease and revascularization on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis","authors":"Yoshiyuki Yamashita ,&nbsp;Serge Sicouri ,&nbsp;Massimo Baudo ,&nbsp;Aleksander Dokollari ,&nbsp;Roberto Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Eric M. Gnall ,&nbsp;Paul M. Coady ,&nbsp;Harish Jarrett ,&nbsp;Sandra V. Abramson ,&nbsp;Katie M. Hawthorne ,&nbsp;Scott M. Goldman ,&nbsp;William A. Gray ,&nbsp;Basel Ramlawi","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/purpose</h3><div><span>To evaluate the impact of coronary artery disease (CAD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary lesion complexity on outcomes of </span>transcatheter aortic valve replacement<span> (TAVR) for aortic stenosis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods/materials</h3><div><span><span>This retrospective study included 1042 patients divided into two groups by the presence or absence of CAD (SYNTAX score 0, no history of revascularization). </span>Propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups. The effect of PCI, </span>SYNTAX score, and residual SYNTAX score was also analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median age of the cohort was 82 years, and 641 patients had CAD. After propensity score matching, 346 pairs were analyzed. During 5 years of follow-up (median: 25, range 0–72 months), the rate of coronary intervention was significantly higher in CAD patients (<em>p</em><span> = 0.018). However, all-cause mortality, composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and coronary intervention, and overt bleeding defined by VARC-3 were comparable. After stratification, in patients with creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl, CAD was associated with a worse composite outcome (</span><em>p</em> = 0.016). Neither PCI nor SYNTAX score was associated with all-cause mortality in CAD patients. Similarly, residual SYNTAX score showed no association with mortality in patients undergoing PCI (all <em>p</em> values &gt;0.7). PCI did not reach a significant difference in overt bleeding in CAD patients (adjusted <em>p</em> = 0.06).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite a higher incidence of coronary interventions, major clinical outcomes were similar between patients with and without CAD after TAVR. In patients with chronic kidney disease, CAD may be associated with an adverse composite outcome. Neither PCI nor SYNTAX/residual SYNTAX score influenced all-cause mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140892033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conduction disorders following transcatheter aortic valve replacement using acurate Neo2 transcatheter heart valve: A propensity matched analysis 使用 Acurate Neo2 经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的传导障碍:倾向匹配分析
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.002
Itamar Loewenstein , Ariel Finkelstein , Shmuel Banai , Amir Halkin , Maayan Konigstein , Jeremy Ben-Shoshan , Yaron Arbel , Israel Barbash , Amit Segev , Planner David , Gabby Elbaz-Greener , Hana Assa-Vaknin , Ran Kornowski , Danny Dvir , Elad Asher , Arie Steinvil

Background

The ACURATE neo2 transcatheter aortic valve was developed to improve paravalvular leak (PVL) rates while maintaining low rates of conduction disturbances and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) seen with its predecessor. We aimed to compare conduction disturbances rates of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using ACURATE Neo2 with other commonly used valves.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the Israeli TAVR registry between the years 2014–2023 was performed to compare conduction disturbances and PVL rates, and procedural outcomes, among patients treated with ACURATE neo2, Edwards Sapien 3 (S3), and Evolut PRO valves. Propensity score matching was performed to compare groups with similar characteristics.

Results

Following exclusion of patients with non-femoral access, unknown valve type, older-generation valves, and less commonly used valves or (n = 4387), our analysis included 3208 patients undergoing TAVR using ACURATE neo2, Edwards S3, and Evolut PRO valves. Propensity matched groups comprised 169 patients each. Rates of any conduction disturbances [left bundle branch block (LBBB), atrioventricular block, or PPMI] were lower in the ACURATE neo2 group compared to both other valves [15.8 %, S3–37.5 % (p < 0.001), Evolut PRO-27.5 % (p = 0.02)] as were LBBB rates [9.0 %, S3–31.3 % (p < 0.001); Evolut PRO-20.1 % (p = 0.01). Atrioventricular block and PPMI rates were lower without statistical significance, as were rates of above-moderate PVL.

Conclusions

In this analysis, TAVR using ACURATE neo2 was associated with a lower composite rate of conduction disturbances in comparison to the Evolut PRO and Edwards S3 valves, mainly due to lower left bundle branch block rates, with non-significantly lower rates of PPMI and PVL.
背景:ACURATE neo2经导管主动脉瓣的开发旨在提高腔旁漏(PVL)率,同时保持其前身所具有的低传导障碍率和永久起搏器植入率(PPMI)。我们旨在比较使用 ACURATE Neo2 的经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与其他常用瓣膜的传导干扰率:我们对 2014-2023 年间的以色列 TAVR 登记进行了回顾性分析,以比较 ACURATE neo2、Edwards Sapien 3 (S3) 和 Evolut PRO 瓣膜治疗患者的传导障碍和 PVL 发生率以及手术结果。为比较具有相似特征的组别,进行了倾向评分匹配:在排除非股动脉入路、瓣膜类型未知、老一代瓣膜和不常用瓣膜的患者(n = 4387)后,我们的分析包括3208名使用ACURATE neo2、Edwards S3和Evolut PRO瓣膜进行TAVR的患者。倾向匹配组各由 169 名患者组成。与其他两种瓣膜相比,ACURATE neo2 组出现任何传导障碍[左束支传导阻滞 (LBBB)、房室传导阻滞或 PPMI]的比例较低[15.8%,S3-37.5% (p 结论:ACURATE neo2 组出现传导障碍的比例较低,S3-37.5% (p 结论:ACURATE neo2 组出现传导障碍的比例较高]:在这项分析中,与Evolut PRO和Edwards S3瓣膜相比,使用ACURATE neo2进行TAVR的传导障碍综合发生率较低,这主要是由于左束支传导阻滞发生率较低,而PPMI和PVL的发生率则无显著性差异。
{"title":"Conduction disorders following transcatheter aortic valve replacement using acurate Neo2 transcatheter heart valve: A propensity matched analysis","authors":"Itamar Loewenstein ,&nbsp;Ariel Finkelstein ,&nbsp;Shmuel Banai ,&nbsp;Amir Halkin ,&nbsp;Maayan Konigstein ,&nbsp;Jeremy Ben-Shoshan ,&nbsp;Yaron Arbel ,&nbsp;Israel Barbash ,&nbsp;Amit Segev ,&nbsp;Planner David ,&nbsp;Gabby Elbaz-Greener ,&nbsp;Hana Assa-Vaknin ,&nbsp;Ran Kornowski ,&nbsp;Danny Dvir ,&nbsp;Elad Asher ,&nbsp;Arie Steinvil","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ACURATE neo2 transcatheter aortic valve<span><span><span> was developed to improve paravalvular leak (PVL) rates while maintaining low rates of </span>conduction disturbances<span> and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) seen with its predecessor. We aimed to compare conduction disturbances rates of </span></span>transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using ACURATE Neo2 with other commonly used valves.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>A retrospective analysis of the Israeli TAVR registry between the years 2014–2023 was performed to compare conduction disturbances and PVL rates, and procedural outcomes, among patients treated with ACURATE neo2, Edwards Sapien 3 (S3), and Evolut PRO valves. </span>Propensity score matching was performed to compare groups with similar characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following exclusion of patients with non-femoral access, unknown valve type, older-generation valves, and less commonly used valves or (<em>n</em><span> = 4387), our analysis included 3208 patients undergoing TAVR using ACURATE neo2, Edwards S3, and Evolut PRO valves. Propensity matched groups comprised 169 patients each. Rates of any conduction disturbances [left bundle branch block (LBBB), atrioventricular block, or PPMI] were lower in the ACURATE neo2 group compared to both other valves [15.8 %, S3–37.5 % (</span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), Evolut PRO-27.5 % (<em>p</em> = 0.02)] as were LBBB rates [9.0 %, S3–31.3 % (p &lt; 0.001); Evolut PRO-20.1 % (<em>p</em> = 0.01). Atrioventricular block and PPMI rates were lower without statistical significance, as were rates of above-moderate PVL.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this analysis, TAVR using ACURATE neo2 was associated with a lower composite rate of conduction disturbances in comparison to the Evolut PRO and Edwards S3 valves, mainly due to lower left bundle branch block rates, with non-significantly lower rates of PPMI and PVL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140891883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A question about what coronary angiography teaches about occlusion and thrombosis in STEMI 关于冠状动脉造影对 STEMI 闭塞和血栓形成的启示的问题。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.10.001
Spencer B. King III
{"title":"A question about what coronary angiography teaches about occlusion and thrombosis in STEMI","authors":"Spencer B. King III","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 104-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and progression of LV dysfunction and dyssynchrony in patients with new-onset LBBB post TAVR TAVR术后新发LBBB患者左心室功能障碍和不同步的发生率和进展。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.011
Andrei D. Margulescu , Dewi E. Thomas , Magid Awadalla , Parin Shah , Ayush Khurana , Omar Aldalati , Daniel R. Obaid , Alexander J. Chase , David Smith

Background

The impact of new-onset left bundle branch block (N-LBBB) developing after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) on cardiac function and mechanical dyssynchrony is not well defined.

Methods

We retrospectively screened all patients who underwent TAVR in our centre between Oct 2018 and Sept 2021 (n = 409). We identified 38 patients with N-LBBB post-operatively (of which 28 were persistent and 10 were transient), and 17 patients with chronic pre-existent LBBB (C-LBBB). We excluded patients requiring pacing post TAVR. For all groups, we retrospectively analysed stored echocardiograms at 3 time points: before TAVR (T0), early after TAVR (T1, 1.2 ± 1.1 days), and late follow-up (T2, 1.5 ± 0.8 years), comparing LV mass and volumes, indices of LV function (LV ejection fraction, LVEF; global longitudinal strain, GLS), and mechanical dyssynchrony indices (systolic stretch index, severity of septal flash).

Results

At baseline (T0), C-LBBB had worse cardiac function, and larger LV volumes and LV mass, compared with patients with N-LBBB. At T1, N-LBBB resulted in mild dyssynchrony and decreased LVEF and GLS. Dyssynchrony progressed at T2 in persistent N-LBBB but not C-LBBB. In both groups however, LVEF remained stable at T2, although individual response was variable. Patients with better LVEF at baseline demonstrated a higher proportion of developing LBBB-induced LV dysfunction at T2. Lack of improvement of LVEF immediately after TAVR predicted deteriorating LVEF at T2. In transient LBBB, cardiac function and most dyssynchrony indices returned to baseline.

Conclusions

N-LBBB after TAVR results in an immediate reduction of cardiac function, in spite of only mild dyssynchrony. When LBBB persists, patients with better cardiac function before TAVR are more likely to have LBBB-induced LV dysfunction after TAVR.
背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后新发左束支传导阻滞(N-LBBB)对心功能和机械不同步的影响尚未明确:我们回顾性地筛查了2018年10月至2021年9月期间在本中心接受TAVR的所有患者(n = 409)。我们确定了 38 例术后出现 N-LBBB 的患者(其中 28 例为持续性,10 例为短暂性),以及 17 例术后出现慢性前期 LBBB(C-LBBB)的患者。我们排除了 TAVR 术后需要起搏的患者。我们回顾性分析了所有组别在3个时间点储存的超声心动图:TAVR前(T0)、TAVR后早期(T1,1.2±1.1天)和随访后期(T2,1.5±0.8年),比较了左心室质量和容积、左心室功能指数(左心室射血分数,LVEF;整体纵向应变,GLS)和机械不同步指数(收缩期舒张指数、室间隔闪光严重程度):结果:与N-LBBB患者相比,基线(T0)时C-LBBB患者的心功能更差,左心室容积和左心室质量更大。在T1,N-LBBB导致轻度不同步,LVEF和GLS下降。在T2期,持续性N-LBBB患者的不同步程度加深,而C-LBBB患者则没有。不过,两组患者的 LVEF 在 T2 阶段均保持稳定,但个体反应不一。基线时 LVEF 较好的患者在 T2 期出现 LBBB 引起的左心室功能障碍的比例较高。TAVR 术后 LVEF 没有立即改善,预示着 T2 时 LVEF 会恶化。在一过性LBBB中,心功能和大多数不同步指数恢复至基线:结论:TAVR术后的N-LBBB会导致心功能立即下降,尽管只有轻微的不同步。当LBBB持续存在时,TAVR前心功能较好的患者在TAVR后更有可能出现LBBB引起的左心室功能障碍。
{"title":"Prevalence and progression of LV dysfunction and dyssynchrony in patients with new-onset LBBB post TAVR","authors":"Andrei D. Margulescu ,&nbsp;Dewi E. Thomas ,&nbsp;Magid Awadalla ,&nbsp;Parin Shah ,&nbsp;Ayush Khurana ,&nbsp;Omar Aldalati ,&nbsp;Daniel R. Obaid ,&nbsp;Alexander J. Chase ,&nbsp;David Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>The impact of new-onset left bundle branch block (N-LBBB) developing after </span>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) on cardiac function and mechanical dyssynchrony is not well defined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively screened all patients who underwent TAVR in our centre between Oct 2018 and Sept 2021 (<em>n</em><span> = 409). We identified 38 patients with N-LBBB post-operatively (of which 28 were persistent and 10 were transient), and 17 patients with chronic pre-existent LBBB (C-LBBB). We excluded patients requiring pacing post TAVR. For all groups, we retrospectively analysed stored echocardiograms<span> at 3 time points: before TAVR (T0), early after TAVR (T1, 1.2 ± 1.1 days), and late follow-up (T2, 1.5 ± 0.8 years), comparing LV mass and volumes, indices of LV function (LV ejection fraction, LVEF; global longitudinal strain, GLS), and mechanical dyssynchrony indices (systolic stretch index, severity of septal flash).</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At baseline (T0), C-LBBB had worse cardiac function, and larger LV volumes and LV mass, compared with patients with N-LBBB. At T1, N-LBBB resulted in mild dyssynchrony and decreased LVEF and GLS. Dyssynchrony progressed at T2 in persistent N-LBBB but not C-LBBB. In both groups however, LVEF remained stable at T2, although individual response was variable. Patients with better LVEF at baseline demonstrated a higher proportion of developing LBBB-induced LV dysfunction at T2. Lack of improvement of LVEF immediately after TAVR predicted deteriorating LVEF at T2. In transient LBBB, cardiac function and most dyssynchrony indices returned to baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>N-LBBB after TAVR results in an immediate reduction of cardiac function, in spite of only mild dyssynchrony. When LBBB persists, patients with better cardiac function before TAVR are more likely to have LBBB-induced LV dysfunction after TAVR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 23-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140866743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Markedly elevated high-sensitivity troponin and in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery 心脏手术后高敏肌钙蛋白明显升高与院内死亡率。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.005
Pavan Reddy , Matteo Cellamare , Ilan Merdler , Cheng Zhang , Sukhdeep Bhogal , Amer I. Aladin , Itsik Ben-Dor , Lowell F. Satler , Toby Rogers , Ron Waksman

Background

High-sensitivity troponin (hsTnI) is correlated with cardiac mortality; however, studies on the relationship of markedly elevated hsTnI with in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery are sparse. Therefore, we aimed to define this relationship in order to help guide in-hospital, acute management of post-surgical patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all cardiac surgeries completed at our institution between January 2020 and June 2022 in which a peak hsTnI was noted to be >35× upper limit of normal (ULN = 34 ng/L). The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and other cardiac surgeries.

Results

A total of 1382 cases met inclusion criteria. The patients' mean age was 64.8 years and 68.2 % were male. Median peak hsTnI after surgery was 4202 ng/L (interquartile ratio: 2427–7654). Univariate analysis of troponin level with mortality found that for every 1000 ng/L increase in hsTnI, odds of in-hospital death increased by 3.8 % (odds ratio [OR]: 1.038; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.027–1.050; p < 0.0001). In a multivariate model, troponin (OR 1.02; 95 % CI 1.01–1.04; p = 0.004) maintained a significant association with in-hospital death. CABG was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital death for any given hsTnI level up to 60,000 ng/L compared to other cardiac surgeries.

Conclusion

Increasing hsTnI level is associated with increasing probability of in-hospital mortality and, therefore, serves as an additional, objective measure of risk to help guide in-hospital clinical management.
背景:高敏肌钙蛋白(hsTnI)与心脏病死亡率相关;然而,有关心脏手术后 hsTnI 明显升高与院内死亡率关系的研究却很少。因此,我们旨在明确这种关系,以帮助指导手术后患者的院内急性期管理:我们回顾性分析了本院 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间完成的所有心脏手术,其中发现 hsTnI 峰值大于正常值上限的 35 倍(ULN = 34 ng/L)。主要结果为院内死亡。为评估冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与其他心脏手术之间的差异,进行了分组分析:共有 1382 例符合纳入标准。患者平均年龄为 64.8 岁,68.2% 为男性。术后 hsTnI 峰值中位数为 4202 ng/L(四分位数比:2427-7654)。对肌钙蛋白水平与死亡率的单变量分析发现,hsTnI每增加1000 ng/L,院内死亡几率增加3.8%(几率比 [OR]:1.038; 95 %置信区间 [CI] 1.027-1.050; p 结论:hsTnI 水平的升高与院内死亡几率的增加有关,因此可作为额外的客观风险测量指标,帮助指导院内临床管理。
{"title":"Markedly elevated high-sensitivity troponin and in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery","authors":"Pavan Reddy ,&nbsp;Matteo Cellamare ,&nbsp;Ilan Merdler ,&nbsp;Cheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Sukhdeep Bhogal ,&nbsp;Amer I. Aladin ,&nbsp;Itsik Ben-Dor ,&nbsp;Lowell F. Satler ,&nbsp;Toby Rogers ,&nbsp;Ron Waksman","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-sensitivity troponin (hsTnI) is correlated with cardiac mortality; however, studies on the relationship of markedly elevated hsTnI with in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery are sparse. Therefore, we aimed to define this relationship in order to help guide in-hospital, acute management of post-surgical patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed all cardiac surgeries completed at our institution between January 2020 and June 2022 in which a peak hsTnI was noted to be &gt;35× upper limit of normal (ULN = 34 ng/L). The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and other cardiac surgeries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>A total of 1382 cases met inclusion criteria. The patients' mean age was 64.8 years and 68.2 % were male. Median peak hsTnI after surgery was 4202 ng/L (interquartile ratio: 2427–7654). Univariate analysis<span> of troponin level with mortality found that for every 1000 ng/L increase in hsTnI, odds of in-hospital death increased by 3.8 % (odds ratio [OR]: 1.038; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.027–1.050; </span></span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). In a multivariate model, troponin <strong>(</strong>OR 1.02; 95 % CI 1.01–1.04; <em>p</em> = 0.004) maintained a significant association with in-hospital death. CABG was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital death for any given hsTnI level up to 60,000 ng/L compared to other cardiac surgeries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Increasing hsTnI level is associated with increasing probability of in-hospital mortality and, therefore, serves as an additional, objective measure of risk to help guide in-hospital clinical management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140892075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Tackling coronary calcified nodules: “Shocking our way to success?” 社论:应对冠状动脉钙化结节:"冲击成功之路?
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.009
Keisuke Yasumura, Annapoorna S. Kini, Samin K. Sharma
{"title":"Editorial: Tackling coronary calcified nodules: “Shocking our way to success?”","authors":"Keisuke Yasumura,&nbsp;Annapoorna S. Kini,&nbsp;Samin K. Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 43-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141312002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1