首页 > 最新文献

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Safety and utility of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis 对并发心源性休克的急性心肌梗死患者进行机械循环支持的安全性和实用性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.016
Jesse Frye, Michael Tao, Shivani Gupta, Chad Gier, Ravi Masson, Tahmid Rahman, Travis Bench, Noelle Mann, Edlira Tam

Background

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is an increasingly utilized therapeutic option in AMI-CS, studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of different forms of MCS have yielded conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different forms of MCS.

Methods

A database search was performed for studies reporting on the association of different forms of MCS with clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS. The primary efficacy endpoints were short term (≤30 days) and long term (>30 days) all-cause mortality. Secondary efficacy endpoints included recurrent AMI, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, device-related limb complications, moderate to severe bleeding events, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA).

Results

2752 patients with AMI-CS met inclusion criteria. Results were available comparing ECMO to other MCS or medical therapy alone, comparing IABP to medical therapy alone, and comparing pLVAD to IABP.
Use of ECMO was not associated with lower risk of 30-day or long-term mortality compared to pVAD or standard medical therapy with or without IABP placement but was associated with higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to pVAD. IABP use was not associated with a lower risk of 30 day or long-term mortality but was associated with higher risk of recurrent AMI and moderate to severe bleeding compared to medical therapy. Compared to IABP, pVAD use was associated with lower risk of CV mortality but not recurrent AMI. pVAD was associated with a higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to IABP use.

Conclusion

Use of ECMO or IABP in patients with AMI-CS is not associated with significant improvement in mortality. pVAD is associated with a lower risk of CV mortality. All MCS types are associated with increased risk of complications. Additional high-quality studies are needed to determine the optimal MCS therapy for patients with AMI-CS.
背景:急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克(AMI-CS)是发病和死亡的主要原因。虽然机械循环支持(MCS)在 AMI-CS 中的应用越来越广泛,但对不同形式 MCS 的有效性和安全性进行评估的研究结果却相互矛盾。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估不同形式 MCS 的安全性和有效性:方法:在数据库中搜索了关于不同形式的 MCS 与 AMI-CS 患者临床疗效相关性的研究报告。主要疗效终点为短期(≤30 天)和长期(>30 天)全因死亡率。次要疗效终点包括复发性 AMI、心血管 (CV) 死亡率、与设备相关的肢体并发症、中度至重度出血事件以及脑血管意外 (CVA)。将 ECMO 与其他 MCS 或单纯药物疗法进行比较、将 IABP 与单纯药物疗法进行比较以及将 pLVAD 与 IABP 进行比较,均得出了结果。与 pVAD 或使用或不使用 IABP 的标准药物疗法相比,使用 ECMO 与较低的 30 天或长期死亡率风险无关,但与 pVAD 相比,使用 ECMO 与较高的设备相关肢体并发症和中度至重度出血风险有关。使用 IABP 与降低 30 天或长期死亡率风险无关,但与药物疗法相比,IABP 与较高的急性心肌梗死复发风险和中重度出血相关。与 IABP 相比,使用 pVAD 与较低的 CV 死亡率风险有关,但与复发 AMI 无关。与使用 IABP 相比,使用 pVAD 与较高的设备相关肢体并发症和中重度出血风险有关:结论:AMI-CS 患者使用 ECMO 或 IABP 与死亡率的显著改善无关。所有 MCS 类型都与并发症风险增加有关。需要进行更多高质量的研究,以确定 AMI-CS 患者的最佳 MCS 治疗方案。
{"title":"Safety and utility of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jesse Frye,&nbsp;Michael Tao,&nbsp;Shivani Gupta,&nbsp;Chad Gier,&nbsp;Ravi Masson,&nbsp;Tahmid Rahman,&nbsp;Travis Bench,&nbsp;Noelle Mann,&nbsp;Edlira Tam","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span><span>Acute myocardial infarction complicated by </span>cardiogenic shock<span> (AMI-CS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is an increasingly utilized therapeutic option in AMI-CS, studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of different forms of MCS have yielded conflicting results. This </span></span>systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different forms of MCS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A database search was performed for studies reporting on the association of different forms of MCS with clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS. The primary efficacy endpoints were short term (≤30 days) and long term (&gt;30 days) all-cause mortality. Secondary efficacy endpoints included recurrent AMI, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, device-related limb complications, moderate to severe bleeding events, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>2752 patients with AMI-CS met inclusion criteria. Results were available comparing ECMO to other MCS or medical therapy alone, comparing </span>IABP to medical therapy alone, and comparing pLVAD to IABP.</div><div>Use of ECMO was not associated with lower risk of 30-day or long-term mortality compared to pVAD or standard medical therapy with or without IABP placement but was associated with higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to pVAD. IABP use was not associated with a lower risk of 30 day or long-term mortality but was associated with higher risk of recurrent AMI and moderate to severe bleeding compared to medical therapy. Compared to IABP, pVAD use was associated with lower risk of CV mortality but not recurrent AMI. pVAD was associated with a higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to IABP use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Use of ECMO or IABP in patients with AMI-CS is not associated with significant improvement in mortality. pVAD is associated with a lower risk of CV mortality. All MCS types are associated with increased risk of complications. Additional high-quality studies are needed to determine the optimal MCS therapy for patients with AMI-CS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 23-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141535571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Prosthesis-patient mismatch prediction in TAVR valve-in-valve procedures TAVR 瓣中瓣手术中假体与患者不匹配的预测。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.022
Elena Bacigalupi , Matteo Perfetti , Marco Zimarino
{"title":"Editorial: Prosthesis-patient mismatch prediction in TAVR valve-in-valve procedures","authors":"Elena Bacigalupi ,&nbsp;Matteo Perfetti ,&nbsp;Marco Zimarino","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 48-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Percutaneous coronary intervention for stable late ST-elevation myocardial infarction with symptoms onset between 12 and 72 h - A systematic review. 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗出现症状12 ~ 72小时的稳定晚期st段抬高型心肌梗死
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.014
Shumail Fatima, Matthew E Harinstein, Mubashir Hussain, John J Pacella

Background: There exists clinical equipoise regarding whether and when an invasive approach should be preferred over conservative treatment in the management of stable late ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting within 12 to 72 h of symptom onset.

Objective: To perform a systematic review to identify the most effective treatment strategy between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy in stable late STEMI presenters by comparing their respective outcomes as well as determine the optimal timing of PCI by evaluating the outcomes of urgent versus non-urgent PCI approach in this patient population.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried from inception until March 2024 for studies comparing the outcomes of PCI versus medical therapy, as well as urgent versus non-urgent PCI, in stable late STEMI patients presenting with symptom onset within 12-72 h. Quality of the studies and risk of bias were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria and the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROBINS-I 2016) tool, respectively.

Results: A total of 8 studies were included in this systematic review that met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 5 studies (1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 1 post-hoc analysis, and 3 observational studies) with an aggregate of 3820 participants compared PCI and medical therapy in stable late STEMI presenters. They found that PCI was associated with statistically significant better short- and long-term outcomes by lowering all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), and infarct size, and by improving myocardial salvage index (P < 0.001). Similarly, a non-statistically significant improvement was seen in the events of cardiac death, heart failure, and revascularization as well as ejection fraction percentage with PCI (P > 0.05). The other 3 studies, involving 1270 participants, were observational and compared urgent versus non-urgent PCI and did not find any statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two approaches (P > 0.05). The included studies were significantly heterogeneous in methodologies, follow-up intervals, and reporting of outcomes. Most of the studies provided moderate quality of evidence and had moderate to serious risk of bias.

Conclusions and relevance: Revascularization through PCI is associated with superior short- and long-term outcomes compared to medical therapy in stable late STEMI patients presenting within 12-72 h of symptom onset. However, the optimal timing of PCI needs further investigation.

背景:对于症状出现后12 - 72小时内出现的迟发性st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),是否以及何时采用有创入路优于保守治疗,目前存在临床平衡。目的:通过比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和药物治疗对稳定晚期STEMI患者最有效的治疗策略,并通过评估紧急与非紧急PCI方法在该患者群体中的结果来确定PCI的最佳时机。方法:查询PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,从建立到2024年3月,比较12-72小时内出现症状的稳定晚期STEMI患者PCI与药物治疗的结果,以及紧急与非紧急PCI的结果。研究的质量和偏倚风险分别使用分级推荐、评估、发展和评估(GRADE)标准和Cochrane偏倚风险(ROBINS-I 2016)工具进行评估。结果:本系统综述共纳入8项符合纳入标准的研究。其中,5项研究(1项随机对照试验(RCT), 1项事后分析和3项观察性研究)共3820名参与者比较了稳定晚期STEMI患者的PCI和药物治疗。他们发现PCI通过降低全因死亡率、复发性心肌梗死(MI)和梗死面积以及改善心肌挽救指数,与具有统计学意义的较好短期和长期预后相关(P < 0.05)。其他3项研究,涉及1270名受试者,是观察性的,比较了紧急和非紧急PCI,两种方法的临床结果没有发现任何统计学意义上的差异(P < 0.05)。纳入的研究在方法、随访时间间隔和结果报告方面存在显著差异。大多数研究提供了中等质量的证据,有中等到严重的偏倚风险。结论和相关性:在症状出现12-72小时内出现的稳定晚期STEMI患者中,与药物治疗相比,PCI血运重建术具有更好的短期和长期预后。然而,PCI的最佳时机需要进一步研究。
{"title":"Percutaneous coronary intervention for stable late ST-elevation myocardial infarction with symptoms onset between 12 and 72 h - A systematic review.","authors":"Shumail Fatima, Matthew E Harinstein, Mubashir Hussain, John J Pacella","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There exists clinical equipoise regarding whether and when an invasive approach should be preferred over conservative treatment in the management of stable late ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting within 12 to 72 h of symptom onset.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a systematic review to identify the most effective treatment strategy between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy in stable late STEMI presenters by comparing their respective outcomes as well as determine the optimal timing of PCI by evaluating the outcomes of urgent versus non-urgent PCI approach in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried from inception until March 2024 for studies comparing the outcomes of PCI versus medical therapy, as well as urgent versus non-urgent PCI, in stable late STEMI patients presenting with symptom onset within 12-72 h. Quality of the studies and risk of bias were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria and the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROBINS-I 2016) tool, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 studies were included in this systematic review that met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 5 studies (1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 1 post-hoc analysis, and 3 observational studies) with an aggregate of 3820 participants compared PCI and medical therapy in stable late STEMI presenters. They found that PCI was associated with statistically significant better short- and long-term outcomes by lowering all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), and infarct size, and by improving myocardial salvage index (P < 0.001). Similarly, a non-statistically significant improvement was seen in the events of cardiac death, heart failure, and revascularization as well as ejection fraction percentage with PCI (P > 0.05). The other 3 studies, involving 1270 participants, were observational and compared urgent versus non-urgent PCI and did not find any statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two approaches (P > 0.05). The included studies were significantly heterogeneous in methodologies, follow-up intervals, and reporting of outcomes. Most of the studies provided moderate quality of evidence and had moderate to serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Revascularization through PCI is associated with superior short- and long-term outcomes compared to medical therapy in stable late STEMI patients presenting within 12-72 h of symptom onset. However, the optimal timing of PCI needs further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term risk of adverse limb outcomes in older patients after endovascular femoral artery revascularization: The Boston femoral artery endovascular revascularization outcomes (Boston FAROUT) study. 老年患者行股动脉血管内重建术后肢体不良结局的长期风险:波士顿股动脉血管内重建术结局(Boston FAROUT)研究
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.017
Jay Khambhati, Piotr Sobieszczyk, Andrew C Eisenhauer, Thomas M Todoran, Scott Kinlay

Introduction: Older patients may be denied endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) due to concerns of worse limb outcomes than younger patients.

Methods: We assessed adverse outcomes in patients after an index revascularization stratified by age (age < 65, 65-75 years, and > 75 years) from two centers between 2003 and 2011 and followed a median 9 (25 %-75 %: 7, 11) years. Outcomes included major adverse limb events (MALE) or minor repeat revascularization, death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). We used cause-specific and competing-risks analyses with clustering by patient to determine the hazard ratios (HR), sub-hazard ratios (SHR), 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI) for outcomes according to older age.

Results: There were 253 limbs revascularized in 202 patients with a high use of lipid lowering therapy (91 %) and aspirin anti-platelet therapy (96 %). In oldest age group (>75 years), 71 limbs were revascularized and patients were less likely to be active smokers and had poorer tibial runoff than younger patients. In competing risks multivariable models, patients >75 years old had similar risks over 10 years of MALE or minor revascularization (SHR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.62) and MACCE (SHR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.58, 2.18) to younger patients. All-cause death was more common in older patients (HR = 1.99, 95%CI = 1.25, 3.17).

Conclusions: After adjusting for the competing risk of death, patients >75 years had similar incidence of adverse limb outcomes and MACCE to younger patients after endovascular revascularization of the femoral artery. Consequently, older patients should be considered for endovascular revascularization when indicated.

老年外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者可能会被拒绝行股浅动脉(SFA)血管内重建术,因为担心其肢体预后比年轻患者更差。方法:我们评估了2003年至2011年间两个中心按年龄(75岁)分层进行指数血运重建术的患者的不良后果,随访时间中位数为9年(25% - 75%:7,11)年。结果包括严重肢体不良事件(MALE)或轻微重复血运重建术、死亡和严重心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)。我们采用病因特异性和竞争风险分析,并按患者进行聚类,以确定不同年龄结局的风险比(HR)、亚风险比(SHR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。结果:202例患者中有253条肢体血运重建,其中高剂量降脂治疗(91%)和阿司匹林抗血小板治疗(96%)。在年龄最大的年龄组(50 ~ 75岁)中,71条肢体进行了血运重建,患者不太可能是活跃的吸烟者,胫骨径流较年轻患者差。在竞争风险多变量模型中,bb0 - 75岁的患者与年轻患者相比,10年内男性或轻度血运重建(SHR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.62)和MACCE (SHR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.58, 2.18)的风险相似。全因死亡在老年患者中更为常见(HR = 1.99, 95%CI = 1.25, 3.17)。结论:在调整了竞争死亡风险后,年龄在0 - 75岁之间的患者在股动脉血管内重建术后的不良肢体结局和MACCE发生率与年轻患者相似。因此,老年患者应考虑在指征时进行血管内血管重建术。
{"title":"Long-term risk of adverse limb outcomes in older patients after endovascular femoral artery revascularization: The Boston femoral artery endovascular revascularization outcomes (Boston FAROUT) study.","authors":"Jay Khambhati, Piotr Sobieszczyk, Andrew C Eisenhauer, Thomas M Todoran, Scott Kinlay","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older patients may be denied endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) due to concerns of worse limb outcomes than younger patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed adverse outcomes in patients after an index revascularization stratified by age (age < 65, 65-75 years, and > 75 years) from two centers between 2003 and 2011 and followed a median 9 (25 %-75 %: 7, 11) years. Outcomes included major adverse limb events (MALE) or minor repeat revascularization, death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). We used cause-specific and competing-risks analyses with clustering by patient to determine the hazard ratios (HR), sub-hazard ratios (SHR), 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI) for outcomes according to older age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 253 limbs revascularized in 202 patients with a high use of lipid lowering therapy (91 %) and aspirin anti-platelet therapy (96 %). In oldest age group (>75 years), 71 limbs were revascularized and patients were less likely to be active smokers and had poorer tibial runoff than younger patients. In competing risks multivariable models, patients >75 years old had similar risks over 10 years of MALE or minor revascularization (SHR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.62) and MACCE (SHR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.58, 2.18) to younger patients. All-cause death was more common in older patients (HR = 1.99, 95%CI = 1.25, 3.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjusting for the competing risk of death, patients >75 years had similar incidence of adverse limb outcomes and MACCE to younger patients after endovascular revascularization of the femoral artery. Consequently, older patients should be considered for endovascular revascularization when indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chapter 13.0. FFR, iFR, CFR, and IMR: Results from clinical trials. 13.0章。FFR、iFR、CFR和IMR:临床试验结果。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.011
Cathevine Yang, Christopher Wong, Kosei Teradaa, Jennifer A Tremmel

In this review article, we provide an overview of the definition and application of fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of coronary microvascular dysfunction. We discuss their respective limitations as it relates to microvascular dysfunction. In each section, we review the most recent evidence supporting their use in microvascular and epicardial coronary artery disease. We also highlight specific clinical conditions with emerging indications for the use of these indices, including in the setting of microvascular dysfunction due to acute myocardial infarction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and post-cardiac transplant.

本文就血流储备分数(FFR)、瞬时无波比(iFR)、冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)和微血管阻力指数(IMR)在冠状动脉微血管功能障碍诊断、预后和治疗中的定义及应用进行综述。我们讨论他们各自的局限性,因为它涉及到微血管功能障碍。在每一部分中,我们回顾了支持它们在微血管和心外膜冠状动脉疾病中的应用的最新证据。我们还强调了使用这些指标的特定临床条件的新适应症,包括急性心肌梗死引起的微血管功能障碍、保留射血分数的心力衰竭和心脏移植后。
{"title":"Chapter 13.0. FFR, iFR, CFR, and IMR: Results from clinical trials.","authors":"Cathevine Yang, Christopher Wong, Kosei Teradaa, Jennifer A Tremmel","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this review article, we provide an overview of the definition and application of fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of coronary microvascular dysfunction. We discuss their respective limitations as it relates to microvascular dysfunction. In each section, we review the most recent evidence supporting their use in microvascular and epicardial coronary artery disease. We also highlight specific clinical conditions with emerging indications for the use of these indices, including in the setting of microvascular dysfunction due to acute myocardial infarction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and post-cardiac transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical implications of cerebral microbleeds in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement. 经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者脑微出血的临床意义。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.013
Yusuke Uemura, Akihito Tanaka, Yuta Ozaki, Shogo Yamaguchi, Takashi Okajima, Takayuki Mitsuda, Shinji Ishikawa, Kenji Takemoto, Toyoaki Murohara, Masato Watarai

Background: The prognostic implications of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the presence of CMBs and adverse outcomes post-TAVR.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we included 124 patients who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging before TAVR. The outcomes of interest were the subsequent incidences of stroke and all-cause death or admission for heart failure.

Results: CMBs were identified in 32.2 % of the included patients. The median follow-up duration was 954 (interquartile range, 553-1306) days. The incidence of stroke after TAVR was comparable between patients with and without CMBs. Conversely, all-cause death or admission for heart failure was significantly higher in patients with CMBs than in those without (log-rank P = 0.010). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of CMBs was independently correlated with the occurrence of all-cause death or admission for heart failure after adjusting for other prognostic predictors (hazard ratio 4.016, 95 % confidence interval 1.572-10.259, P = 0.007).

Conclusion: The presence of CMBs predicts the incidence of all-cause death or admission for heart failure in patients undergoing TAVR. Evaluating CMBs could provide useful information for post-TAVR management.

背景:脑微出血(CMBs)对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者的预后影响尚未完全阐明。因此,我们的目的是调查CMBs的存在与tavr后不良结局之间的关系。方法:在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们纳入了124例在TAVR前接受脑磁共振成像的患者。关注的结果是随后中风和全因死亡或因心力衰竭入院的发生率。结果:32.2%的患者有CMBs。中位随访时间为954天(四分位数间距553-1306)。TAVR后卒中的发生率在有和没有CMBs的患者之间具有可比性。相反,CMBs患者的全因死亡或心力衰竭入院率明显高于无CMBs患者(log-rank P = 0.010)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,在校正其他预后预测因子后,CMBs的存在与全因死亡或因心力衰竭入院的发生率独立相关(风险比4.016,95%可信区间1.572-10.259,P = 0.007)。结论:CMBs的存在可预测TAVR患者全因死亡或因心力衰竭入院的发生率。评价CMBs可以为tavr后的管理提供有用的信息。
{"title":"Clinical implications of cerebral microbleeds in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Yusuke Uemura, Akihito Tanaka, Yuta Ozaki, Shogo Yamaguchi, Takashi Okajima, Takayuki Mitsuda, Shinji Ishikawa, Kenji Takemoto, Toyoaki Murohara, Masato Watarai","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic implications of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the presence of CMBs and adverse outcomes post-TAVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study, we included 124 patients who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging before TAVR. The outcomes of interest were the subsequent incidences of stroke and all-cause death or admission for heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMBs were identified in 32.2 % of the included patients. The median follow-up duration was 954 (interquartile range, 553-1306) days. The incidence of stroke after TAVR was comparable between patients with and without CMBs. Conversely, all-cause death or admission for heart failure was significantly higher in patients with CMBs than in those without (log-rank P = 0.010). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of CMBs was independently correlated with the occurrence of all-cause death or admission for heart failure after adjusting for other prognostic predictors (hazard ratio 4.016, 95 % confidence interval 1.572-10.259, P = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of CMBs predicts the incidence of all-cause death or admission for heart failure in patients undergoing TAVR. Evaluating CMBs could provide useful information for post-TAVR management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functional coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chronic kidney disease.
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.009
Kalyan R Chitturi, Sant Kumar, Flavia Tejada Frisancho, Sana Rahman, Matteo Cellamare, Ilan Merdler, Itsik Ben-Dor, Ron Waksman, Hayder D Hashim, Brian C Case
{"title":"Functional coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chronic kidney disease.","authors":"Kalyan R Chitturi, Sant Kumar, Flavia Tejada Frisancho, Sana Rahman, Matteo Cellamare, Ilan Merdler, Itsik Ben-Dor, Ron Waksman, Hayder D Hashim, Brian C Case","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143042159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic value of CHA2DS2-VASc score for in-hospital outcomes in patients with Takotsubo syndrome. CHA2DS2-VASc评分对Takotsubo综合征患者住院预后的预测价值
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.015
Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, Cesar Joel Benites-Moya, Samuel J Apple, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula

Background: There is uncertainty about the use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score to predict clinical events in patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). This study aimed to assess the short-term prognostic role of CHA2DS2-VASc score in this population.

Methods: All admissions with a primary diagnosis of TTS were included using data from the National Inpatient Sample database during 2016-2019. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke, intracardiac thrombus, cardiogenic shock, requirement for mechanical circulatory support, and renal replacement therapy. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. (0-3, 4-6, and >6). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

Results: A total 32,595 weighted hospitalizations were included (median age was 67 [58-76] years; 90 % female). The median CHA2DS2-VASc score value was 4 (2-5). In the adjusted models, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the CHA2DS2-VASc 4-6 (OR 1.86, 95 % CI 1.09-3.16, p = 0.022) and CHA2DS2-VASc >6 (OR 3.35, 95 % CI 1.60-7.04, p = 0.001) groups compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc 0-3 group. Likewise, the CHA2DS2-VASc >6 group had significantly higher odds of ischemic stroke (OR 2.92, 95 % CI 1.22-6.96, p = 0.016), intracardiac thrombus (OR 3.56, 95 % CI 1.36-9.30, p = 0.010), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.05-2.86, =0.033), and renal replacement therapy (OR 2.87, 95 % CI 1.04-7.92, p = 0.042).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the CHA2DS2-VASc score is relatively useful for predicting in-hospital mortality and a range of clinical events in hospitalized patients with TTS.

背景:CHA2DS2-VASc评分用于预测Takotsubo综合征(TTS)患者的临床事件存在不确定性。本研究旨在评估CHA2DS2-VASc评分在该人群中的短期预后作用。方法:使用2016-2019年国家住院患者样本数据库的数据纳入所有初步诊断为TTS的入院患者。主要结局是住院死亡率,次要结局包括缺血性卒中、心内血栓、心源性休克、机械循环支持的需求和肾脏替代治疗。根据CHA2DS2-VASc评分将患者分为3组。(0- 3,4 - 6,6)。采用Logistic回归估计比值比(OR),置信区间为95%。结果:共纳入32,595例加权住院(中位年龄为67[58-76]岁;90%为女性)。CHA2DS2-VASc评分中位数为4(2-5)。在调整后的模型中,CHA2DS2-VASc 4-6组(OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.09-3.16, p = 0.022)和CHA2DS2-VASc bbb6组(OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.60-7.04, p = 0.001)的住院死亡率显著高于CHA2DS2-VASc 0-3组。同样,CHA2DS2-VASc bbb6组缺血性卒中(OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.22-6.96, p = 0.016)、心内血栓(OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.36-9.30, p = 0.010)、心源性休克(OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.86, =0.033)和肾脏替代治疗(OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.04-7.92, p = 0.042)的发生率显著较高。结论:我们的研究结果表明CHA2DS2-VASc评分对于预测住院TTS患者的住院死亡率和一系列临床事件相对有用。
{"title":"Prognostic value of CHA2DS2-VASc score for in-hospital outcomes in patients with Takotsubo syndrome.","authors":"Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, Cesar Joel Benites-Moya, Samuel J Apple, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is uncertainty about the use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score to predict clinical events in patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). This study aimed to assess the short-term prognostic role of CHA2DS2-VASc score in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All admissions with a primary diagnosis of TTS were included using data from the National Inpatient Sample database during 2016-2019. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke, intracardiac thrombus, cardiogenic shock, requirement for mechanical circulatory support, and renal replacement therapy. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. (0-3, 4-6, and >6). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 32,595 weighted hospitalizations were included (median age was 67 [58-76] years; 90 % female). The median CHA2DS2-VASc score value was 4 (2-5). In the adjusted models, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the CHA2DS2-VASc 4-6 (OR 1.86, 95 % CI 1.09-3.16, p = 0.022) and CHA2DS2-VASc >6 (OR 3.35, 95 % CI 1.60-7.04, p = 0.001) groups compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc 0-3 group. Likewise, the CHA2DS2-VASc >6 group had significantly higher odds of ischemic stroke (OR 2.92, 95 % CI 1.22-6.96, p = 0.016), intracardiac thrombus (OR 3.56, 95 % CI 1.36-9.30, p = 0.010), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.05-2.86, =0.033), and renal replacement therapy (OR 2.87, 95 % CI 1.04-7.92, p = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the CHA2DS2-VASc score is relatively useful for predicting in-hospital mortality and a range of clinical events in hospitalized patients with TTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The optimal intervention for in-stent restenosis: Unravelling Ariadne's thread. 支架内再狭窄的最佳干预:解开阿里阿德涅线。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.019
Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Aggelos Papanikolaou, Nikolaos Pyrpyris, Konstantinos Tsioufis
{"title":"The optimal intervention for in-stent restenosis: Unravelling Ariadne's thread.","authors":"Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Aggelos Papanikolaou, Nikolaos Pyrpyris, Konstantinos Tsioufis","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Resting and hyperemic translesional pressure indices: Similarities and discordances. 静息和充血横切压指数:相似性和不一致性。
IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.006
Edward Ha, Takeshi Nishi, Stephen J Peterson, Manish A Parikh, Yuhei Kobayashi
{"title":"Resting and hyperemic translesional pressure indices: Similarities and discordances.","authors":"Edward Ha, Takeshi Nishi, Stephen J Peterson, Manish A Parikh, Yuhei Kobayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1