首页 > 最新文献

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Artificial intelligence–powered software outperforms interventional cardiologists in assessment of IVUS-based stent optimization 人工智能驱动的软件在评估静脉支架优化方面优于介入心脏病专家。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.07.011
Pablo M. Rubio , Hector M. Garcia-Garcia , Jason Galo , Abhishek Chaturvedi , Brian C. Case , Gary S. Mintz , Itsik Ben-Dor , Hayder Hashim , Ron Waksman

Background

Optimal stent deployment assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is associated with improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, IVUS remains underutilized due to its time-consuming analysis and reliance on operator expertise. AVVIGO™+, an FDA-approved artificial intelligence (AI) software, offers automated lesion assessment, but its performance for stent evaluation has not been thoroughly investigated.

Aim

To assess whether an artificial intelligence–powered software (AVVIGO™+) provides a superior evaluation of IVUS-based stent expansion index (%Stent expansion = Minimum Stent Area (MSA) / Distal reference lumen area) and geographic miss (i.e. >50 % plaque burden – PB - at stent edges) compared to the current gold standard method performed by interventional cardiologists (IC), defined as frame-by-frame visual assessment by interventional cardiologists, selecting the MSA and the reference frame with the largest lumen area within 5 mm of the stent edge, following expert consensus.

Methods

This retrospective study included 60 patients (47,997 IVUS frames) who underwent IVUS guided PCI, independently analyzed by IC and AVVIGO™+. Assessments included minimum stent area (MSA), stent expansion index, and PB at proximal and distal reference segments. For expansion, a threshold of 80 % was used to define suboptimal results. The time required for expansion analysis was recorded for both methods. Concordance, absolute and relative differences were evaluated.

Results

AVVIGO™ + consistently identified lower mean expansion (70.3 %) vs. IC (91.2 %), (p < 0.0001), primarily due to detecting frames with smaller MSA values (5.94 vs. 7.19 mm2, p = 0.0053). This led to 25 discordant cases in which AVVIGO™ + reported suboptimal expansion while IC classified the result as adequate. The analysis time was significantly shorter with AVVIGO™ + (0.76 ± 0.39 min) vs IC (1.89 ± 0.62 min) (p < 0.0001), representing a 59.7 % reduction. For geographic miss, AVVIGO™ + reported higher PB than IC at both distal (51.8 % vs. 43.0 %, p < 0.0001) and proximal (50.0 % vs. 43.0 %, p = 0.0083) segments. When applying the 50 % PB threshold, AVVIGO™ + identified PB ≥50 % not seen by IC in 12 cases (6 distal, 6 proximal).

Conclusion

AVVIGO™ + demonstrated improved detection of suboptimal stent expansion and geographic miss compared to interventional cardiologists, while also significantly reducing analysis time. These findings suggest that AI-based platforms may offer a more reliable and efficient approach to IVUS-guided stent optimization, with potential to enhance consistency in clinical practice.
背景:血管内超声(IVUS)评估的最佳支架部署与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后预后的改善有关。然而,由于IVUS的分析耗时且依赖于操作人员的专业知识,因此仍未得到充分利用。AVVIGO™+是fda批准的人工智能(AI)软件,可提供自动病变评估,但其在支架评估方面的性能尚未得到彻底研究。目的:为了评估人工智能驱动的软件(AVVIGO™+)是否在静脉支架扩张指数(支架扩张% =最小支架面积(MSA) /远端参考管腔面积)和地理遗漏(即支架边缘> 50%斑块负担- PB -)方面优于目前由介入性心脏病专家(IC)执行的金标准方法,定义为由介入性心脏病专家逐帧视觉评估。根据专家意见,在支架边缘5mm范围内选择最大管腔面积的MSA和参考框架。方法:本回顾性研究包括60例(47,997 IVUS框架)接受IVUS引导的PCI,通过IC和AVVIGO™+独立分析。评估包括最小支架面积(MSA)、支架扩张指数、近端和远端参考节段的PB。对于扩展,使用80%的阈值来定义次优结果。记录两种方法展开分析所需的时间。评价一致性、绝对差异和相对差异。结果:AVVIGO™+的平均膨胀率(70.3%)与IC(91.2%)一致,(p 2, p = 0.0053)。这导致了25例不一致的病例,其中AVVIGO™+报告了次优扩张,而IC将结果归类为适当。与IC相比,AVVIGO™+的分析时间显著缩短(0.76±0.39分钟)(1.89±0.62分钟)(p)。结论:与介入性心脏病专家相比,AVVIGO™+在检测次优支架扩张和地理遗漏方面表现出改进,同时也显著缩短了分析时间。这些发现表明,基于人工智能的平台可能为ivus引导的支架优化提供更可靠和有效的方法,具有增强临床实践一致性的潜力。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence–powered software outperforms interventional cardiologists in assessment of IVUS-based stent optimization","authors":"Pablo M. Rubio ,&nbsp;Hector M. Garcia-Garcia ,&nbsp;Jason Galo ,&nbsp;Abhishek Chaturvedi ,&nbsp;Brian C. Case ,&nbsp;Gary S. Mintz ,&nbsp;Itsik Ben-Dor ,&nbsp;Hayder Hashim ,&nbsp;Ron Waksman","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.07.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Optimal stent deployment assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is associated with improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, IVUS remains underutilized due to its time-consuming analysis and reliance on operator expertise. AVVIGO™+, an FDA-approved artificial intelligence (AI) software, offers automated lesion assessment, but its performance for stent evaluation has not been thoroughly investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To assess whether an artificial intelligence–powered software (AVVIGO™+) provides a superior evaluation of IVUS-based stent expansion index (%Stent expansion = Minimum Stent Area (MSA) / Distal reference lumen area) and geographic miss (i.e. &gt;50 % plaque burden – PB - at stent edges) compared to the current gold standard method performed by interventional cardiologists (IC), defined as frame-by-frame visual assessment by interventional cardiologists, selecting the MSA and the reference frame with the largest lumen area within 5 mm of the stent edge, following expert consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 60 patients (47,997 IVUS frames) who underwent IVUS guided PCI, independently analyzed by IC and AVVIGO™+. Assessments included minimum stent area (MSA), stent expansion index, and PB at proximal and distal reference segments. For expansion, a threshold of 80 % was used to define suboptimal results. The time required for expansion analysis was recorded for both methods. Concordance, absolute and relative differences were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AVVIGO™ + consistently identified lower mean expansion (70.3 %) vs. IC (91.2 %), (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001), primarily due to detecting frames with smaller MSA values (5.94 vs. 7.19 mm<sup>2</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.0053). This led to 25 discordant cases in which AVVIGO™ + reported suboptimal expansion while IC classified the result as adequate. The analysis time was significantly shorter with AVVIGO™ + (0.76 ± 0.39 min) vs IC (1.89 ± 0.62 min) (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001), representing a 59.7 % reduction. For geographic miss, AVVIGO™ + reported higher PB than IC at both distal (51.8 % vs. 43.0 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and proximal (50.0 % vs. 43.0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.0083) segments. When applying the 50 % PB threshold, AVVIGO™ + identified PB ≥50 % not seen by IC in 12 cases (6 distal, 6 proximal).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AVVIGO™ + demonstrated improved detection of suboptimal stent expansion and geographic miss compared to interventional cardiologists, while also significantly reducing analysis time. These findings suggest that AI-based platforms may offer a more reliable and efficient approach to IVUS-guided stent optimization, with potential to enhance consistency in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144761786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vessel-specific angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in an all-comer population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, a PIONEER IV trial substudy. 在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有角落人群中,血管特异性血管造影衍生的微循环阻力指数,PIONEER IV试验亚研究。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.017
Chris Lenselink, Kim Ricken, Tsung-Ying Tsai, Mick Renkens, Maria Papavasileiou, Sanne Stuiver, Erik Lipsic, Adriaan Voors, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick Serruys, Joanna Wykrzykowska

Background: Recently, angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance (angio-IMR) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to estimate CMD during cardiac catheterization. Whether CMD differs across vessel territories and populations remains disputed.

Methods: Consecutive all-comer patients undergoing coronary angiography for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) enrolled in the PIONEER-IV trial at the University Medical Center Groningen were included. Angio-IMR was retrospectively calculated using quantitative flow ratio (QFR) software in all three major coronary vessel territories pre- and post-PCI, if applicable. Angio-IMR levels were compared between coronary vessels, indication, and sex. The association between angio-IMR and LV function on AI-derived echocardiography analyses were assessed.

Results: In 220 patients, mean age was 65 ± 9 years, 18.3 % were women, and 20.3 % presented with NSTEMI. CMD was common: 80.0 % had baseline angio-IMR ≥25 mmHg·s/cm. Angio-IMR was similar in the LAD, RCA and LCX in both target and non-target vessels (p > 0.05). In the LAD, angio-IMR increased significantly post-PCI (p < 0.001), while RCA and LCX showed no significant change. Whilst NSTEMI patients showed similar baseline angio-IMR as CCS patients, they had lower post-PCI angio-IMR (p = 0.011). Women had lower average post-PCI angio-IMR (27 vs. 37 mmHg·s/cm, p < 0.001) and showed improved microvascular resistance post-PCI. Angio-IMR was not associated with cardiac function overall, but in NSTEMI patients, higher baseline angio-IMR correlated with worse LV function.

Conclusion: Angio-IMR is similar in all coronary vessels, but lower in NSTEMI patients than in CCS and lower in women. In NSTEMI patients, higher IMR was associated with worse LV function.

背景:最近,血管造影衍生的微血管阻力指数(angio-IMR)已成为心导管插入术中评估CMD的一种微创替代方法。CMD是否在不同的船舶区域和种群之间存在差异仍存在争议。方法:在格罗宁根大学医学中心进行的PIONEER-IV试验中,连续接受慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)或非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)冠脉造影的所有患者被纳入。如果适用,应用定量血流比(QFR)软件在pci术前和术后的所有三个主要冠状动脉区域回顾性计算血管imr。血管- imr水平在冠状血管、指征和性别之间进行比较。在人工智能衍生超声心动图分析中评估血管- imr和左室功能之间的关系。结果:220例患者平均年龄65±9岁,女性18.3%,NSTEMI患者20.3%。CMD是常见的:80.0%的基线血管imr≥25 mmHg·s/cm。靶血管和非靶血管的LAD、RCA和LCX的血管imr相似(p < 0.05)。结论:所有冠状血管的血管imr相似,但NSTEMI患者的血管imr低于CCS患者,女性更低。在非stemi患者中,较高的IMR与较差的左室功能相关。
{"title":"Vessel-specific angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in an all-comer population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, a PIONEER IV trial substudy.","authors":"Chris Lenselink, Kim Ricken, Tsung-Ying Tsai, Mick Renkens, Maria Papavasileiou, Sanne Stuiver, Erik Lipsic, Adriaan Voors, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick Serruys, Joanna Wykrzykowska","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance (angio-IMR) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to estimate CMD during cardiac catheterization. Whether CMD differs across vessel territories and populations remains disputed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive all-comer patients undergoing coronary angiography for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) enrolled in the PIONEER-IV trial at the University Medical Center Groningen were included. Angio-IMR was retrospectively calculated using quantitative flow ratio (QFR) software in all three major coronary vessel territories pre- and post-PCI, if applicable. Angio-IMR levels were compared between coronary vessels, indication, and sex. The association between angio-IMR and LV function on AI-derived echocardiography analyses were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 220 patients, mean age was 65 ± 9 years, 18.3 % were women, and 20.3 % presented with NSTEMI. CMD was common: 80.0 % had baseline angio-IMR ≥25 mmHg·s/cm. Angio-IMR was similar in the LAD, RCA and LCX in both target and non-target vessels (p > 0.05). In the LAD, angio-IMR increased significantly post-PCI (p < 0.001), while RCA and LCX showed no significant change. Whilst NSTEMI patients showed similar baseline angio-IMR as CCS patients, they had lower post-PCI angio-IMR (p = 0.011). Women had lower average post-PCI angio-IMR (27 vs. 37 mmHg·s/cm, p < 0.001) and showed improved microvascular resistance post-PCI. Angio-IMR was not associated with cardiac function overall, but in NSTEMI patients, higher baseline angio-IMR correlated with worse LV function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Angio-IMR is similar in all coronary vessels, but lower in NSTEMI patients than in CCS and lower in women. In NSTEMI patients, higher IMR was associated with worse LV function.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of chronic kidney disease on in-hospital outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions. 慢性肾脏疾病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性全闭塞患者住院结果的影响
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.022
David Šarenac, Ilija Doknić, Ronald K Binder, Marko Banović

Background: Approximately one-tenth of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a chronic total occlusion(CTO) have chronic kidney disease (CKD). There are limited data on outcomes in patients with CKD undergoing elective CTO PCI and our aim was to investigate the short-term outcomes of these patients.

Methods: We utilized Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (years 2010-11) to identify all hospitalizations associated with elective single-vessel CTO PCI. Afterwards, patients were categorized into two groups according to CKD status, with the CKD group further stratified by stage. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were periprocedural complications. We also investigated the length of hospital stay and costs. Discharge weights were used to produce national estimates.

Results: We identified 6164 adult patients who underwent single-vessel CTO PCI. There were 604 patients (9.85 %) with CKD. They were older, with higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CKD was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality, demonstrating a 74 % increase in odds per category (non-CKD, moderate-severe CKD (encompassing CKD stage 3-5) and end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis). Patients with CKD had significantly higher rates of periprocedural myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury (AKI) and need for initiation of dialysis, as well as composite outcome of periprocedural complications. Consequently, this resulted in longer hospital stay and higher hospitalization costs.

Conclusion: CKD is independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing elective single-vessel CTO PCI, demonstrating increasing odds with worsening CKD. Presence of CKD is associated with a higher rate of periprocedural complications, prolonged hospital stay and increased hospitalization costs.

背景:大约十分之一接受慢性全闭塞(CTO)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者患有慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)。关于CKD患者接受选择性CTO PCI的预后数据有限,我们的目的是调查这些患者的短期预后。方法:我们利用全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库(2010-11年)来确定所有与选择性单血管CTO PCI相关的住院情况。然后根据CKD状态将患者分为两组,CKD组进一步按分期分层。主要结局是住院死亡率,次要结局是围手术期并发症。我们还调查了住院时间和费用。排放重量被用来产生国家估计。结果:我们确定了6164例接受单血管CTO PCI的成年患者。CKD 604例(9.85%)。他们年龄较大,高血压、糖尿病、心房颤动、外周动脉疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患病率较高。CKD与较高的住院死亡率独立相关,显示每个类别(非CKD,中重度CKD(包括CKD 3-5期)和需要慢性透析的终末期肾脏疾病)的风险增加74%。CKD患者的围手术期心肌梗死、急性肾损伤(AKI)和开始透析的发生率以及围手术期并发症的综合结果均显著高于CKD患者。因此,这导致住院时间更长,住院费用更高。结论:CKD与选择性单血管CTO PCI患者较高的住院死亡率独立相关,CKD恶化的可能性增加。CKD的存在与较高的围手术期并发症发生率、住院时间延长和住院费用增加有关。
{"title":"Impact of chronic kidney disease on in-hospital outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions.","authors":"David Šarenac, Ilija Doknić, Ronald K Binder, Marko Banović","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately one-tenth of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a chronic total occlusion(CTO) have chronic kidney disease (CKD). There are limited data on outcomes in patients with CKD undergoing elective CTO PCI and our aim was to investigate the short-term outcomes of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (years 2010-11) to identify all hospitalizations associated with elective single-vessel CTO PCI. Afterwards, patients were categorized into two groups according to CKD status, with the CKD group further stratified by stage. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were periprocedural complications. We also investigated the length of hospital stay and costs. Discharge weights were used to produce national estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 6164 adult patients who underwent single-vessel CTO PCI. There were 604 patients (9.85 %) with CKD. They were older, with higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CKD was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality, demonstrating a 74 % increase in odds per category (non-CKD, moderate-severe CKD (encompassing CKD stage 3-5) and end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis). Patients with CKD had significantly higher rates of periprocedural myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury (AKI) and need for initiation of dialysis, as well as composite outcome of periprocedural complications. Consequently, this resulted in longer hospital stay and higher hospitalization costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CKD is independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing elective single-vessel CTO PCI, demonstrating increasing odds with worsening CKD. Presence of CKD is associated with a higher rate of periprocedural complications, prolonged hospital stay and increased hospitalization costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of manual with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. 急性冠脉综合征患者手动与机械抽吸取栓的比较。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.020
Matthew Nardi, Mohamed Rezk, Jorge Escobar, Alexander Postalian, Kathy Dougherty, Allison Weiderhold, Priyanka Sen, Mahboob Alam, George Younis, Mehran Massumi, Emerson Perin, Nikolaos Diakos

Background: Routine manual aspiration thrombectomy has shown limited benefit in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Selective application of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with ACS and high thrombus burden may improve coronary flow and myocardial perfusion. We aimed to compare safety and efficacy between manual (MaT) and mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (MeT) in this population.

Methods: Retrospective review of 70 patients presenting with ACS between May 2019 and February 2024, with 27 receiving MaT and 43 MeT. Our comparative analysis included Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) thrombus grade, TIMI flow grade, Myocardial Blush grade, survival to discharge and stroke.

Results: There was no difference in the clinical characteristics of the two groups except higher prevalence of hypertension in the MaT group (93 % vs 70 % in MeT, p = 0.02). Baseline thrombus burden did not differ between groups. Both MaT and MeT resulted in a significant reduction in thrombus burden and improvement in coronary flow and myocardial blush. MaT and MeT had similar post-thrombectomy rates of TIMI thrombus grade 0 (63 % vs 77 %, p = 0.3), TIMI flow grade 3 (70 % vs 67 %, p = 1) and Myocardial Blush grade 3 (44 % vs 51 %, p = 0.6). One stroke was reported in the MeT group. Finally, Survival to discharge was similar (MaT 88 % vs MeT 84 %, p = 0.7).

Conclusions: Selective thrombectomy in ACS patients with high thrombus burden is safe and effectively reduces thrombus burden while improving coronary flow and myocardial perfusion. Manual and mechanical thrombectomy show similar efficacy and safety profiles.

背景:常规人工抽吸取栓对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的疗效有限。选择性机械取栓对ACS高血栓负荷患者可改善冠脉血流和心肌灌注。我们的目的是比较手动(MaT)和机械吸入性取栓(MeT)在这一人群中的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2019年5月至2024年2月期间出现ACS的70例患者,其中27例接受MaT治疗,43例接受MeT治疗。我们的比较分析包括心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血栓分级、TIMI血流分级、心肌红晕分级、存活至出院和卒中。结果:两组的临床特征无差异,但MaT组高血压患病率较高(93% vs 70% MeT, p = 0.02)。各组之间基线血栓负荷无差异。MaT和MeT均能显著减少血栓负担,改善冠状动脉血流和心肌红肿。MaT和MeT在TIMI血栓0级(63% vs 77%, p = 0.3)、TIMI血流3级(70% vs 67%, p = 1)和心肌红肿3级(44% vs 51%, p = 0.6)的取栓率相似。MeT组报告了一例中风。最后,到出院的生存率相似(MaT 88% vs MeT 84%, p = 0.7)。结论:选择性取栓对ACS高血栓负荷患者安全有效,可减轻血栓负荷,改善冠状动脉血流和心肌灌注。手动和机械取栓显示出相似的疗效和安全性。
{"title":"Comparison of manual with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome.","authors":"Matthew Nardi, Mohamed Rezk, Jorge Escobar, Alexander Postalian, Kathy Dougherty, Allison Weiderhold, Priyanka Sen, Mahboob Alam, George Younis, Mehran Massumi, Emerson Perin, Nikolaos Diakos","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine manual aspiration thrombectomy has shown limited benefit in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Selective application of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with ACS and high thrombus burden may improve coronary flow and myocardial perfusion. We aimed to compare safety and efficacy between manual (MaT) and mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (MeT) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of 70 patients presenting with ACS between May 2019 and February 2024, with 27 receiving MaT and 43 MeT. Our comparative analysis included Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) thrombus grade, TIMI flow grade, Myocardial Blush grade, survival to discharge and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in the clinical characteristics of the two groups except higher prevalence of hypertension in the MaT group (93 % vs 70 % in MeT, p = 0.02). Baseline thrombus burden did not differ between groups. Both MaT and MeT resulted in a significant reduction in thrombus burden and improvement in coronary flow and myocardial blush. MaT and MeT had similar post-thrombectomy rates of TIMI thrombus grade 0 (63 % vs 77 %, p = 0.3), TIMI flow grade 3 (70 % vs 67 %, p = 1) and Myocardial Blush grade 3 (44 % vs 51 %, p = 0.6). One stroke was reported in the MeT group. Finally, Survival to discharge was similar (MaT 88 % vs MeT 84 %, p = 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selective thrombectomy in ACS patients with high thrombus burden is safe and effectively reduces thrombus burden while improving coronary flow and myocardial perfusion. Manual and mechanical thrombectomy show similar efficacy and safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145945620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of predicted post-PCI FFR derived from coronary computed tomography angiography versus observed angiographic FFR: emerging concept of wireless end-to-end physiology-guided PCI. 冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影与观察到的血管造影FFR预测的PCI后FFR的比较:无线端到端生理引导PCI的新概念。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.019
Pedro E P Carvalho, João L Cavalcante, John Lesser, Victor Cheng, Dimitrios Strepkos, Michaella Alexandrou, Olga Mastrodemos, Bavana V Rangan, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Yader Sandoval

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) facilitates virtual PCI planning and informs stent length selection based on predicted post-PCI FFRCT. This approach was previously validated against pressure-wire based FFR. Whether angiographic FFR can be used to ascertain the target post-PCI FFRCT predicted from CCTA is uncertain.

Methods: Observational cohort study of patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with an FFRCT ≤ 0.80 that were referred to CCTA-guided PCI using the FFRCT-based virtual planner (HeartFlow Inc.) for pre-procedural guidance and FFRangio (CathWorks Ltd.) for intra- and post-procedural assessment. Virtual FFR pullbacks (FFR measurements every 1 mm across the vessel length) were analyzed and compared for both FFRCT and FFRangio modalities. We evaluated the agreement between pre- and post-PCI FFRCT and FFRangio at matched locations using the Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Virtual FFR pullbacks (FFR measurements every 1 mm across the vessel length) were analyzed and compared for both FFRCT and FFRangio modalities.

Results: A total of 2290 post-PCI FFR values were derived from 20 vessels that underwent CCTA-guided PCI virtual PCI followed by post-PCI FFRangio. FFR values were matched across FFR pullback tracings that allowed the comparison of predicted post-PCI FFRCT to observed post PCI FFRangio results. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) (45 %) was the most common target vessel. A strong correlation was observed between FFRCT and FFRangio (R = 0.74; p < 0.001). The mean difference at matched locations was -0. 01 FFR units, with a standard deviation of 0.04 and limits of agreement ranging from -0.10 to 0.07.

Conclusion: Predicted post-PCI FFRCT values derived from CCTA-based virtual PCI have an excellent correlation with observed post-PCI FFRangio values derived from invasive coronary angiography after stenting. These findings highlight the novel concept of wireless end-to-end physiology guided PCI, integrating pre-PCI FFRCT and post-PCI angiographic FFR as complementary tools.

背景:冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(FFRCT)得出的分数血流储备(FFR)有助于虚拟PCI计划,并根据预测的PCI后FFRCT为支架长度选择提供信息。该方法之前在基于压力丝的FFR上进行了验证。血管造影FFR能否用于确定CCTA预测的pci后FFRCT目标尚不确定。方法:观察性队列研究,接受冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)的患者,FFRCT≤0.80,使用基于FFRCT的虚拟规划器(HeartFlow Inc.)进行术前指导,FFRangio (CathWorks Ltd.)进行术中和术后评估。分析并比较了FFRCT和FFRangio两种方式的虚拟FFR回拉(在血管长度上每1mm测量FFR)。我们使用Pearson相关系数和Bland-Altman分析来评估pci术前和术后FFRCT和FFRangio在匹配部位的一致性。分析并比较了FFRCT和FFRangio两种方式的虚拟FFR回拉(在血管长度上每1mm测量FFR)。结果:共有2290个PCI后FFR值来自20个血管,这些血管接受了ccta引导的PCI虚拟PCI,随后接受了PCI后FFRangio。FFR值在FFR回拉追踪中匹配,从而可以将PCI后FFRCT预测结果与PCI后观察到的FFRangio结果进行比较。左侧前降支(LAD)是最常见的靶血管(45%)。结论:基于ccta的虚拟PCI预测的PCI后FFRCT值与支架植入术后有创冠状动脉造影观察到的PCI后FFRangio值具有极好的相关性。这些发现强调了无线端到端生理引导PCI的新概念,将PCI前FFRCT和PCI后血管造影FFR作为补充工具。
{"title":"Comparison of predicted post-PCI FFR derived from coronary computed tomography angiography versus observed angiographic FFR: emerging concept of wireless end-to-end physiology-guided PCI.","authors":"Pedro E P Carvalho, João L Cavalcante, John Lesser, Victor Cheng, Dimitrios Strepkos, Michaella Alexandrou, Olga Mastrodemos, Bavana V Rangan, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Yader Sandoval","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFR<sub>CT</sub>) facilitates virtual PCI planning and informs stent length selection based on predicted post-PCI FFR<sub>CT</sub>. This approach was previously validated against pressure-wire based FFR. Whether angiographic FFR can be used to ascertain the target post-PCI FFR<sub>CT</sub> predicted from CCTA is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational cohort study of patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with an FFR<sub>CT</sub> ≤ 0.80 that were referred to CCTA-guided PCI using the FFR<sub>CT</sub>-based virtual planner (HeartFlow Inc.) for pre-procedural guidance and FFR<sub>angio</sub> (CathWorks Ltd.) for intra- and post-procedural assessment. Virtual FFR pullbacks (FFR measurements every 1 mm across the vessel length) were analyzed and compared for both FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>angio</sub> modalities. We evaluated the agreement between pre- and post-PCI FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>angio</sub> at matched locations using the Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Virtual FFR pullbacks (FFR measurements every 1 mm across the vessel length) were analyzed and compared for both FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>angio</sub> modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2290 post-PCI FFR values were derived from 20 vessels that underwent CCTA-guided PCI virtual PCI followed by post-PCI FFR<sub>angio</sub>. FFR values were matched across FFR pullback tracings that allowed the comparison of predicted post-PCI FFR<sub>CT</sub> to observed post PCI FFR<sub>angio</sub> results. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) (45 %) was the most common target vessel. A strong correlation was observed between FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>angio</sub> (R = 0.74; p < 0.001). The mean difference at matched locations was -0. 01 FFR units, with a standard deviation of 0.04 and limits of agreement ranging from -0.10 to 0.07.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predicted post-PCI FFR<sub>CT</sub> values derived from CCTA-based virtual PCI have an excellent correlation with observed post-PCI FFRangio values derived from invasive coronary angiography after stenting. These findings highlight the novel concept of wireless end-to-end physiology guided PCI, integrating pre-PCI FFR<sub>CT</sub> and post-PCI angiographic FFR as complementary tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Suture-based vs plug-based vascular access closure in patients undergoing transcatheter transfemoral aortic valve implantation. 经导管经股主动脉瓣植入术中基于缝线与基于堵头的血管通路关闭。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.016
Luca Paolucci, Andrea Buono, Michele Colucci, Mattia Basile, Michele Galasso, Ludovica Lenci, Angelo Giuseppe Marino, Diego Maffeo, Mario Scarpelli, Amelia Focaccio, Daniele Maselli, Carlo Briguori

Background and aims: Suture-based vascular closure devices (S-VCD) plus the liberal use of an additional small plug-based VCD have been demonstrated to be superior to "pure" plug-based VCD (P-VCD) in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Preliminary data suggests that the systematic use of the arteriotomy-site ballooning plus concomitant manual compression following P-VCD (MANTA, Teleflex) delivery may optimize the device apposition and should be adopted to improve the final hemostatic efficacy.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI at two Italian centers between were included. Patients treated with S-VCD and balloon assisted P-VCD were matched for major variables. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any in-hospital vascular complication. All outcomes were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 statement.

Results: Overall, 799 patients were included (S-VCD: 451; balloon-assisted P-VCD: 348). Patients in the S-VCD group received 2 ProGlides (Abbott Vascular Inc.) plus the liberal use of an additional small plug-based VCD. Patients in the P-VCD group received the systematic use of the arteriotomy-site ballooning plus concomitant manual compression. After matching, 123 pairs of subjects were selected. The primary outcome occurred in 11.4 % of patients in the S-VCD group and 6.5 % in the balloon assisted P-VCD group (OR 0.56, 95 % CI (0.22-1.40); p = 0.217). Major VARC-3 vascular complications were more frequent in the S-VCD cohort (OR 0.12, 95 % CI (0.01-0.96); p = 0.048). No differences were found for the composite of major vascular complications and in-hospital death (OR 0.59, 95 % CI (0.19-1.88); p = 0.377). Any VARC-3 access related bleedings were slightly more frequent in the S-VCD group (OR 0.27, 95 % CI (0.07-0.99); p = 0.048), while no differences were evident for major bleedings (OR 0.28, 95 % CI (0.06-1.40); p = 0.122).

Conclusions: The balloon-assisted P-VCD showed similar vascular outcomes compared to traditional S-VCD in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI.

背景和目的:在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者中,基于缝线的血管闭合装置(S-VCD)加上额外的小塞基VCD的自由使用已被证明优于“纯”塞基VCD (P-VCD)。初步数据表明,在P-VCD (MANTA, Teleflex)输送后,系统地使用动脉切开术部位充气并同时进行手动加压可以优化装置的放置,并应采用这种方法来提高最终的止血效果。方法:在两个意大利中心连续接受经股TAVI的患者。采用S-VCD和球囊辅助P-VCD治疗的患者在主要变量上进行匹配。主要观察指标为院内血管并发症的发生情况。所有结果均根据Valve学术研究联盟(VARC)-3声明进行定义。结果:总共纳入799例患者(S-VCD: 451例;球囊辅助P-VCD: 348例)。S-VCD组患者接受2个ProGlides(雅培血管公司)和一个额外的小塞式VCD的自由使用。在P-VCD组患者接受系统使用动脉切开术部位球囊加伴随的手动压迫。配对后,选出123对被试。S-VCD组11.4%的患者出现主要结局,球囊辅助P-VCD组6.5%的患者出现主要结局(OR 0.56, 95% CI (0.22-1.40);p = 0.217)。主要的VARC-3血管并发症在S-VCD队列中更为常见(OR 0.12, 95% CI (0.01-0.96);p = 0.048)。主要血管并发症和院内死亡的组合无差异(OR 0.59, 95% CI (0.19-1.88);p = 0.377)。S-VCD组与VARC-3通路相关的出血发生率略高(OR 0.27, 95% CI (0.07-0.99);p = 0.048),而大出血无明显差异(OR 0.28, 95% CI (0.06-1.40);p = 0.122)。结论:与传统的S-VCD相比,球囊辅助P-VCD在经股TAVI患者中的血管预后相似。
{"title":"Suture-based vs plug-based vascular access closure in patients undergoing transcatheter transfemoral aortic valve implantation.","authors":"Luca Paolucci, Andrea Buono, Michele Colucci, Mattia Basile, Michele Galasso, Ludovica Lenci, Angelo Giuseppe Marino, Diego Maffeo, Mario Scarpelli, Amelia Focaccio, Daniele Maselli, Carlo Briguori","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Suture-based vascular closure devices (S-VCD) plus the liberal use of an additional small plug-based VCD have been demonstrated to be superior to \"pure\" plug-based VCD (P-VCD) in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Preliminary data suggests that the systematic use of the arteriotomy-site ballooning plus concomitant manual compression following P-VCD (MANTA, Teleflex) delivery may optimize the device apposition and should be adopted to improve the final hemostatic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI at two Italian centers between were included. Patients treated with S-VCD and balloon assisted P-VCD were matched for major variables. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any in-hospital vascular complication. All outcomes were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 799 patients were included (S-VCD: 451; balloon-assisted P-VCD: 348). Patients in the S-VCD group received 2 ProGlides (Abbott Vascular Inc.) plus the liberal use of an additional small plug-based VCD. Patients in the P-VCD group received the systematic use of the arteriotomy-site ballooning plus concomitant manual compression. After matching, 123 pairs of subjects were selected. The primary outcome occurred in 11.4 % of patients in the S-VCD group and 6.5 % in the balloon assisted P-VCD group (OR 0.56, 95 % CI (0.22-1.40); p = 0.217). Major VARC-3 vascular complications were more frequent in the S-VCD cohort (OR 0.12, 95 % CI (0.01-0.96); p = 0.048). No differences were found for the composite of major vascular complications and in-hospital death (OR 0.59, 95 % CI (0.19-1.88); p = 0.377). Any VARC-3 access related bleedings were slightly more frequent in the S-VCD group (OR 0.27, 95 % CI (0.07-0.99); p = 0.048), while no differences were evident for major bleedings (OR 0.28, 95 % CI (0.06-1.40); p = 0.122).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The balloon-assisted P-VCD showed similar vascular outcomes compared to traditional S-VCD in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantitative flow ratio and non-hyperemic pressure ratio in patients with intermediate coronary lesions. 中级冠状动脉病变患者的定量血流比和非充血压比。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.021
Simone Finocchiaro, Maria Sara Mauro, Davide Sclofani, Marco Spagnolo, Antonio Greco, Davide Capodanno

Background: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a recent, non-invasive method for functional coronary assessment, providing estimates of lesion-specific ischemia without the need for pressure wires or hyperemic agents. While its diagnostic concordance with fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been previously explored, data comparing QFR to non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs), such as instantaneous wave-free ratio (iwFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), remain limited.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic agreement between QFR and NHPRs in real-world patients undergoing physiological assessment for intermediate coronary stenoses.

Methods: Lesions from the CAST registry with available iwFR or RFR and analyzable angiograms for QFR computation were included. Ischemia was defined as NHPRs ≤0.89 or QFR ≤0.80. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and ROC analysis (AUC via DeLong's method). Agreement was evaluated with Cohen's kappa and Bland-Altman analysis. McNemar's test assessed asymmetry in discordant pairs. Spearman's correlation and logistic univariate and multivariable regressions identified predictors of QFR-NHPRs discordance.

Results: A total of 174 lesions from 142 patients were included in the final analysis. QFR demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 79 %, with a sensitivity of 90 % and a negative predictive value of 82 %, in respect of NHPRs. Specificity and positive predictive value were 63 % and 78 %, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.80 (95 % CI, 0.733-0.867). QFR underestimated ischemia in 14.9 % of lesions (false negatives), and overall diagnostic discordance with NHPRs occurred in 20.7 % of cases. Longer lesion length was independently associated with higher concordance (OR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.012), while bifurcation lesions were predictors of discordance (OR 4.81, 95 % CI 1.30-21.12, p = 0.024).

Conclusions: QFR shows moderate concordance with NHPRs and may serve as a useful, wire-free alternative for excluding functionally significant stenoses. While it demonstrated high sensitivity, the risk of false negatives in certain anatomical subsets highlights the value of a cautious, individualized approach, possibly integrating QFR with invasive indices or imaging modalities in selected cases.

背景:定量血流比(QFR)是一种最新的、无创的冠状动脉功能评估方法,可提供病变特异性缺血的估计,而不需要加压针或充血剂。虽然其诊断与分数血流储备(FFR)的一致性已经被探索过,但将QFR与非充血压比(nhpr),如瞬时无波比(iwFR)和静息全周期比(RFR)进行比较的数据仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在评估QFR和nhpr在现实世界中对中度冠状动脉狭窄进行生理评估的患者的诊断一致性。方法:包括CAST登记的病变,具有可用的iwFR或RFR和可分析的血管图像,用于计算QFR。以NHPRs≤0.89或QFR≤0.80定义缺血。采用敏感性、特异性、预测值和ROC分析(DeLong’s method的AUC)评估诊断效果。采用Cohen的kappa和Bland-Altman分析评估一致性。McNemar的测试评估了不一致配对的不对称性。Spearman相关和logistic单变量和多变量回归确定了qfr - nhpr不一致的预测因子。结果:142例患者共174个病灶纳入最终分析。QFR对nhpr的诊断准确率为79%,敏感性为90%,阴性预测值为82%。特异性为63%,阳性预测值为78%。ROC曲线下面积为0.80 (95% CI, 0.733 ~ 0.867)。QFR在14.9%的病变中低估了缺血(假阴性),20.7%的病例与nhpr的总体诊断不一致。较长的病变长度与较高的一致性独立相关(OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.012),而分叉病变是不一致性的预测因子(OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.30-21.12, p = 0.024)。结论:QFR与nhpr有一定程度的一致性,可作为一种有用的、无导线的替代方法,用于排除功能显著的狭窄。虽然它显示出高灵敏度,但在某些解剖亚群中存在假阴性的风险,这突出了谨慎、个性化方法的价值,可能在选定的病例中将QFR与侵入性指标或成像方式结合起来。
{"title":"Quantitative flow ratio and non-hyperemic pressure ratio in patients with intermediate coronary lesions.","authors":"Simone Finocchiaro, Maria Sara Mauro, Davide Sclofani, Marco Spagnolo, Antonio Greco, Davide Capodanno","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a recent, non-invasive method for functional coronary assessment, providing estimates of lesion-specific ischemia without the need for pressure wires or hyperemic agents. While its diagnostic concordance with fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been previously explored, data comparing QFR to non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs), such as instantaneous wave-free ratio (iwFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic agreement between QFR and NHPRs in real-world patients undergoing physiological assessment for intermediate coronary stenoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lesions from the CAST registry with available iwFR or RFR and analyzable angiograms for QFR computation were included. Ischemia was defined as NHPRs ≤0.89 or QFR ≤0.80. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and ROC analysis (AUC via DeLong's method). Agreement was evaluated with Cohen's kappa and Bland-Altman analysis. McNemar's test assessed asymmetry in discordant pairs. Spearman's correlation and logistic univariate and multivariable regressions identified predictors of QFR-NHPRs discordance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 lesions from 142 patients were included in the final analysis. QFR demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 79 %, with a sensitivity of 90 % and a negative predictive value of 82 %, in respect of NHPRs. Specificity and positive predictive value were 63 % and 78 %, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.80 (95 % CI, 0.733-0.867). QFR underestimated ischemia in 14.9 % of lesions (false negatives), and overall diagnostic discordance with NHPRs occurred in 20.7 % of cases. Longer lesion length was independently associated with higher concordance (OR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.012), while bifurcation lesions were predictors of discordance (OR 4.81, 95 % CI 1.30-21.12, p = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QFR shows moderate concordance with NHPRs and may serve as a useful, wire-free alternative for excluding functionally significant stenoses. While it demonstrated high sensitivity, the risk of false negatives in certain anatomical subsets highlights the value of a cautious, individualized approach, possibly integrating QFR with invasive indices or imaging modalities in selected cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145897033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative outcomes of intracardiac versus transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage occlusion. 心内超声心动图与经食管超声心动图治疗左心耳闭塞的比较结果。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.018
Hasaan Ahmed, Mahmoud Ismayl, Ali Bin Abdul Jabbar, Andrew Michael Goldsweig, Ahmed Aboeata
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of intracardiac versus transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage occlusion.","authors":"Hasaan Ahmed, Mahmoud Ismayl, Ali Bin Abdul Jabbar, Andrew Michael Goldsweig, Ahmed Aboeata","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of double versus single stenting on myocardial work in complex left main bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention. 复合左主干分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中双支架置入与单支架置入对心肌功能的影响。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.015
Marco Zuin, Giuseppe Marchese, Francesca Prevedello, Ervis Hiso, Andrea Bertolini, Marco Foroni, Gianluca Rigatelli

Background: Provisional single stenting is the recommended default strategy for complex left main (LM) bifurcation lesions. However, double stenting may improve side branch patency in such cases, though its effect on myocardial performance remains uncertain. We compare 30-day changes in non-invasive myocardial work (MW) indices following double versus provisional single stenting in patients with complex LM bifurcations.

Method: In this prospective, single-center analysis, 282 patients with complex LM bifurcation lesions undergoing PCI between October 2023 and June 2025 were included. Patients were treated with either double stenting (culotte, nano-inverted-T, or TAP; n = 141) or provisional single stenting (n = 141) and matched 1:1 by propensity score. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and 30 days post-PCI. MW indices, including global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE), were derived from non-invasive pressure-strain analysis.

Results: Baseline characteristics and echocardiographic indices were comparable between groups. Both strategies improved GWI and GCW and reduced GWW (all p < 0.0001). However, double stenting was associated with greater improvements in all MW indices [ΔGWI 218.3 ± 93.3 vs. 117.2 ± 83.4 mmHg% and ΔGCW177.7 ± 75.4 vs. 99.7 ± 83.6 mmHg% (both p < 0.001); ΔGWW -44.9 ± 31.0 vs. -23.8 ± 32.1 mmHg% (p < 0.001), and ΔGWE +3.1 ± 1.9 vs. +1.4 ± 1.9 % (p < 0.001)].

Conclusions: In complex LM bifurcation lesions, double stenting leads to superior 30-day recovery of MW compared with provisional single stenting, suggesting enhanced left ventricular efficiency.

背景:临时单支架植入术是复杂左主干(LM)分叉病变推荐的默认策略。然而,在这种情况下,双支架置入可以改善侧支通畅,尽管其对心肌性能的影响尚不确定。我们比较了复杂LM分叉患者双支架置入与临时单支架置入后30天无创心肌功(MW)指数的变化。方法:在这项前瞻性单中心分析中,纳入了282例在2023年10月至2025年6月期间接受PCI治疗的复杂LM分叉病变患者。患者接受双支架置入(n = 141)或临时单支架置入(n = 141),并按倾向评分1:1匹配。在基线和pci后30天进行超声心动图检查。通过非侵入式压力-应变分析,得到全局功指数(GWI)、全局建设性功(GCW)、全局浪费功(GWW)和全局工作效率(GWE)。结果:两组间基线特征及超声心动图指标具有可比性。两种策略均改善了GWI和GCW,降低了GWW(均p)。结论:在复杂的LM分叉病变中,与临时单支支架相比,双支支架可使MW在30天内恢复良好,表明左室效率提高。
{"title":"Impact of double versus single stenting on myocardial work in complex left main bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Marco Zuin, Giuseppe Marchese, Francesca Prevedello, Ervis Hiso, Andrea Bertolini, Marco Foroni, Gianluca Rigatelli","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Provisional single stenting is the recommended default strategy for complex left main (LM) bifurcation lesions. However, double stenting may improve side branch patency in such cases, though its effect on myocardial performance remains uncertain. We compare 30-day changes in non-invasive myocardial work (MW) indices following double versus provisional single stenting in patients with complex LM bifurcations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this prospective, single-center analysis, 282 patients with complex LM bifurcation lesions undergoing PCI between October 2023 and June 2025 were included. Patients were treated with either double stenting (culotte, nano-inverted-T, or TAP; n = 141) or provisional single stenting (n = 141) and matched 1:1 by propensity score. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and 30 days post-PCI. MW indices, including global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE), were derived from non-invasive pressure-strain analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics and echocardiographic indices were comparable between groups. Both strategies improved GWI and GCW and reduced GWW (all p < 0.0001). However, double stenting was associated with greater improvements in all MW indices [ΔGWI 218.3 ± 93.3 vs. 117.2 ± 83.4 mmHg% and ΔGCW177.7 ± 75.4 vs. 99.7 ± 83.6 mmHg% (both p < 0.001); ΔGWW -44.9 ± 31.0 vs. -23.8 ± 32.1 mmHg% (p < 0.001), and ΔGWE +3.1 ± 1.9 vs. +1.4 ± 1.9 % (p < 0.001)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In complex LM bifurcation lesions, double stenting leads to superior 30-day recovery of MW compared with provisional single stenting, suggesting enhanced left ventricular efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Measuring what matters: Integrating coronary severity and ischemia to predict outcomes. 社论:衡量什么是重要的:整合冠状动脉严重程度和缺血来预测预后。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.014
Beni Rai Verma, Brian C Case
{"title":"Editorial: Measuring what matters: Integrating coronary severity and ischemia to predict outcomes.","authors":"Beni Rai Verma, Brian C Case","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145828541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1