首页 > 最新文献

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Percutaneous transaxillary arterial access for closure of post-infarction ventricular septal defect. 经皮经腋窝动脉介入治疗梗死后室间隔缺损。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.011
Siu-Fung Wong, Mehdi Eskandari, James Cockburn, Christopher Broyd, Joao Ferreira-Martins, Huda Abu-Own, Andrew Hill, Arionilson Gomes, Jonathan Byrne, David Hildick-Smith

Background: Post-infarction ventricular septal defect (PiVSD) is a rare but fatal complication of myocardial infarction (MI). Percutaneous closure via conventional venous access and venoarterial rail increases procedural complexity and time, exerts strain on surrounding septal tissue, and results in device angulation. Whilst such drawbacks can be mitigated with the transaxillary arterial approach, the acute safety and long-term efficacy are unreported.

Methods: We included all patients undergoing percutaneous transaxillary transarterial PiVSD closure in two large tertiary centres in England from April 2020 to May 2025. Procedural data, periprocedural, in-hospital and 1-year mortality were determined through review of local and national electronic records.

Results: Nine patients with comorbid cardiogenic shock were included. The median duration from MI to PiVSD closure was 4 (interquartile range 3-11) days. Right axillary access was used in all cases. The device implanted was either a 24 mm Amplatzer P.I. Muscular VSD Occluder or a larger Amplatzer Septal Occluder (Abbott, USA) necessitating an 80 cm 12F introduction sheath. Closure of the PiVSD was technically successful in all patients with reduction of the interventricular shunt to mild or less in eight of them. One patient died periprocedurally due to device erosion and cardiac tamponade. In-hospital death occurred in seven patients (77.8 %), in five of whom (55.6 %) death was attributed to cardiovascular causes. The two surviving patients had no further adverse events during 36 months of follow-up.

Conclusion: Transaxillary access is a technically reasonable approach for transarterial PiVSD closure. Periprocedural mortality is acceptable in a severely sick population. Survivors to discharge do well on longer-term follow-up.

背景:梗死后室间隔缺损(PiVSD)是心肌梗死(MI)的一种罕见但致命的并发症。经皮经常规静脉通道和静脉动脉轨道闭合增加了手术的复杂性和时间,对周围的间隔组织施加压力,并导致器械成角。虽然这些缺点可以通过经腋窝动脉入路减轻,但其急性安全性和长期疗效尚未报道。方法:我们纳入了2020年4月至2025年5月在英国两个大型三级中心接受经皮经腋窝经动脉PiVSD闭合的所有患者。通过审查地方和国家电子记录,确定了手术数据、手术期间、住院和1年死亡率。结果:共纳入9例合并心源性休克患者。从心肌梗死到PiVSD关闭的中位持续时间为4天(四分位数间距为3-11)。所有病例均采用右腋窝通道。植入的装置是24mm Amplatzer P.I.肌肉VSD封堵器或更大的Amplatzer室间隔封堵器(Abbott, USA),需要80 cm 12F的引入鞘。所有患者的PiVSD关闭在技术上都是成功的,其中8例患者的室间分流减少到轻度或更少。1例患者术中因器械糜烂和心包填塞死亡。7例(77.8%)患者发生院内死亡,其中5例(55.6%)死亡归因于心血管原因。在36个月的随访中,两名幸存的患者没有发生进一步的不良事件。结论:经腋窝入路是经动脉PiVSD闭合术中技术上合理的入路。危重病人的围手术期死亡率是可以接受的。出院的幸存者在长期随访中表现良好。
{"title":"Percutaneous transaxillary arterial access for closure of post-infarction ventricular septal defect.","authors":"Siu-Fung Wong, Mehdi Eskandari, James Cockburn, Christopher Broyd, Joao Ferreira-Martins, Huda Abu-Own, Andrew Hill, Arionilson Gomes, Jonathan Byrne, David Hildick-Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-infarction ventricular septal defect (PiVSD) is a rare but fatal complication of myocardial infarction (MI). Percutaneous closure via conventional venous access and venoarterial rail increases procedural complexity and time, exerts strain on surrounding septal tissue, and results in device angulation. Whilst such drawbacks can be mitigated with the transaxillary arterial approach, the acute safety and long-term efficacy are unreported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all patients undergoing percutaneous transaxillary transarterial PiVSD closure in two large tertiary centres in England from April 2020 to May 2025. Procedural data, periprocedural, in-hospital and 1-year mortality were determined through review of local and national electronic records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients with comorbid cardiogenic shock were included. The median duration from MI to PiVSD closure was 4 (interquartile range 3-11) days. Right axillary access was used in all cases. The device implanted was either a 24 mm Amplatzer P.I. Muscular VSD Occluder or a larger Amplatzer Septal Occluder (Abbott, USA) necessitating an 80 cm 12F introduction sheath. Closure of the PiVSD was technically successful in all patients with reduction of the interventricular shunt to mild or less in eight of them. One patient died periprocedurally due to device erosion and cardiac tamponade. In-hospital death occurred in seven patients (77.8 %), in five of whom (55.6 %) death was attributed to cardiovascular causes. The two surviving patients had no further adverse events during 36 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transaxillary access is a technically reasonable approach for transarterial PiVSD closure. Periprocedural mortality is acceptable in a severely sick population. Survivors to discharge do well on longer-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Revascularization of chronic total occlusions following acute coronary syndromes: Is time of the essence or better late than never? 社论:急性冠状动脉综合征后慢性全闭塞的血运重建术:时间是关键还是晚做总比不做好?
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.012
Behnam N Tehrani, Raghav Gattani, Lindsey Cilia
{"title":"Editorial: Revascularization of chronic total occlusions following acute coronary syndromes: Is time of the essence or better late than never?","authors":"Behnam N Tehrani, Raghav Gattani, Lindsey Cilia","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor on "Examining the relationship between monocytes and monocyte-derived ratios in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients and their impact on coronary artery disease progression". 致编辑关于“检查经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者单核细胞和单核细胞衍生比例之间的关系及其对冠状动脉疾病进展的影响”的信。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.010
Ankur Sharma, Varshini Vadhithala, Arun Kumar, Sushma Verma, Sushma Narsing Katkuri
{"title":"Letter to the editor on \"Examining the relationship between monocytes and monocyte-derived ratios in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients and their impact on coronary artery disease progression\".","authors":"Ankur Sharma, Varshini Vadhithala, Arun Kumar, Sushma Verma, Sushma Narsing Katkuri","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined strategy of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of mitral valve and percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device to treat high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock. 经导管二尖瓣边缘修复联合经皮机械循环支持装置治疗重度二尖瓣返流合并心源性休克高危患者
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.008
Mohsin S Mughal, Divya Ratan Verma, Kapil Lotun, Mustafa Suppah, Sant Kumar, Thomas Waggoner, H Kenith Fang, Satya Atmakuri, Hursh Naik
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute mitral regurgitation (MR) associated with cardiogenic shock (CS) is a medical emergency with excessive in-hospital mortality. The vast majority of these patients are turned down for corrective surgery. The combined strategy of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of mitral valves and percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices to treat high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>In this multicenter registry we aimed to assess the outcomes (all-cause mortality, other important secondary outcomes included freedom from 30-day cardiac death or cardiac readmission, 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day cardiovascular mortality, and 30-day MACE events) of the combined strategy of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of Mitral Valve and Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Device to Treat High-Risk Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Cardiogenic Shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter registry retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients who presented with severe MR, had persistent cardiogenic shock (CS) despite appropriate therapy (including mechanical circulatory support [MCS]), were turned down for surgery due to operative risk from acuity at presentation, and were considered for TEER by a heart team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one consecutive patients with severe acute or acute-on-chronic MR (anatomy suitable for M-TEER) and CS who were undergoing TEER after surgical turndown were included. Mean age was 63 years (SD ± 12.4), 71 % males, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score predicted risk of mortality (STS-PROM) was 20.1 ± 19.2 % (range: 3.1 to 82), 71 % required mechanical ventilation, 52 % had pulmonary edema, 48 % had index acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 19 % required dialysis, 100 % had Impella™ in place. Immediate procedural outcomes included 100 % technical success, MR grade 1.2+ (mild, p < 0.001), and no events for device-device interaction were observed. The primary outcome of in-hospital all-cause mortality was 4.7 % (1 death from multiorgan failure). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 14 %, and three patients died. The procedural success rate was 81 %, with one readmission for DVT that was treated with oral anticoagulation, and none of the patients required mitral valve reintervention at 30-day follow up. Echocardiography at 30 days revealed an MR grade of ≤2+ (mild or moderate) in 94 %, and mean LVEF improved from baseline to 30 days (24.3 ± 11.3 % vs 30.5 ± 14 % respectively) (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock, who are at high risk for surgery, were treated with a combined approach of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of MV. We found this approach safe and it effectively improved mortality and symptoms. Large
背景:急性二尖瓣反流(MR)合并心源性休克(CS)是一种住院死亡率高的医学急诊。这些患者中的绝大多数都被拒绝接受矫正手术。经导管二尖瓣边缘修复联合经皮机械循环支持装置治疗严重二尖瓣返流和心源性休克高危患者的联合策略尚未在随机对照试验中进行评估。目的:在这个多中心登记中,我们旨在评估经导管二尖瓣边缘对边缘修复和经皮机械循环支持装置联合治疗严重二尖瓣返流和心源性休克高危患者的结局(全因死亡率,其他重要的次要结局包括30天心脏死亡或心脏再入院,30天全因死亡率,30天心血管死亡率和30天MACE事件)。方法:这项多中心登记回顾性评估了所有出现严重MR的连续患者,尽管接受了适当的治疗(包括机械循环支持[MCS]),但仍有持续心源性休克(CS),由于就诊时的手术风险而拒绝手术,并被心脏小组考虑进行TEER。结果:包括21例连续的严重急性或急性慢性MR(解剖结构适合M-TEER)和CS患者,他们在手术降血压后接受TEER。平均年龄为63岁(SD±12.4),71%为男性,平均胸外科学会评分预测死亡风险(STS-PROM)为20.1±19.2%(范围:3.1至82),71%需要机械通气,52%患有肺水肿,48%患有急性心肌梗死(AMI), 19%需要透析,100%使用Impella™。即时手术结果包括100%技术成功,MR等级1.2+(轻度,p级)。结论:严重二尖瓣返流和心源性休克的患者,手术风险高,采用经皮机械循环支持和经导管边缘对边缘修复二尖瓣的联合方法治疗。我们发现这种方法是安全的,它有效地改善了死亡率和症状。需要更大规模的研究和临床试验来评估这种联合方法的有效性。
{"title":"Combined strategy of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of mitral valve and percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device to treat high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock.","authors":"Mohsin S Mughal, Divya Ratan Verma, Kapil Lotun, Mustafa Suppah, Sant Kumar, Thomas Waggoner, H Kenith Fang, Satya Atmakuri, Hursh Naik","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Acute mitral regurgitation (MR) associated with cardiogenic shock (CS) is a medical emergency with excessive in-hospital mortality. The vast majority of these patients are turned down for corrective surgery. The combined strategy of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of mitral valves and percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices to treat high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims: &lt;/strong&gt;In this multicenter registry we aimed to assess the outcomes (all-cause mortality, other important secondary outcomes included freedom from 30-day cardiac death or cardiac readmission, 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day cardiovascular mortality, and 30-day MACE events) of the combined strategy of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of Mitral Valve and Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Device to Treat High-Risk Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Cardiogenic Shock.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This multicenter registry retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients who presented with severe MR, had persistent cardiogenic shock (CS) despite appropriate therapy (including mechanical circulatory support [MCS]), were turned down for surgery due to operative risk from acuity at presentation, and were considered for TEER by a heart team.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Twenty-one consecutive patients with severe acute or acute-on-chronic MR (anatomy suitable for M-TEER) and CS who were undergoing TEER after surgical turndown were included. Mean age was 63 years (SD ± 12.4), 71 % males, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score predicted risk of mortality (STS-PROM) was 20.1 ± 19.2 % (range: 3.1 to 82), 71 % required mechanical ventilation, 52 % had pulmonary edema, 48 % had index acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 19 % required dialysis, 100 % had Impella™ in place. Immediate procedural outcomes included 100 % technical success, MR grade 1.2+ (mild, p &lt; 0.001), and no events for device-device interaction were observed. The primary outcome of in-hospital all-cause mortality was 4.7 % (1 death from multiorgan failure). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 14 %, and three patients died. The procedural success rate was 81 %, with one readmission for DVT that was treated with oral anticoagulation, and none of the patients required mitral valve reintervention at 30-day follow up. Echocardiography at 30 days revealed an MR grade of ≤2+ (mild or moderate) in 94 %, and mean LVEF improved from baseline to 30 days (24.3 ± 11.3 % vs 30.5 ± 14 % respectively) (p = 0.001).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients with severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock, who are at high risk for surgery, were treated with a combined approach of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of MV. We found this approach safe and it effectively improved mortality and symptoms. Large","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145783434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prasugrel monotherapy versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy in STEMI patients undergoing intravascular imaging-guided PCI: Study design and rationale of the randomized PREMIUM trial. 接受血管内成像引导PCI的STEMI患者接受普拉格雷单药治疗与12个月双重抗血小板治疗:研究设计和随机溢价试验的基本原理
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.007
Kuniaki Takahashi, Ken Kozuma, Yoshihiro Morino, Kosuke Kashiwabara, Hiromasa Otake, Satoru Suwa, Mamoru Nanasato, Takashi Muramatsu, Hitoshi Anzai, Akihiro Shirakabe, Masashi Yamamoto, Yasuhide Asaumi, Masashi Sakuma, Hideki Okayama, Yuji Ikari, Gaku Nakazawa

Background: Previous randomized trials have demonstrated the safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with 12-month DAPT following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, the safety of initiating prasugrel monotherapy at the time of primary PCI in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unknown.

Methods/design: The PREMIUM (Prasugrel monotherapy following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction) trial is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. A total of 2268 STEMI patients indicated for primary PCI with current generation platinum‑chromium everolimus-eluting stents were randomized 1:1 to either prasugrel monotherapy (20 mg loading, 3.75 mg daily) initiated before PCI or standard 12-month DAPT with aspirin plus prasugrel. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months tested for noninferiority. The major secondary endpoint is Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding at 12 months tested for superiority.

Summary: The PREMIUM trial is the first large-scale randomized study to evaluate an upfront aspirin-free strategy with prasugrel monotherapy compared with standard 12-month DAPT in STEMI undergoing contemporary imaging-guided PCI. The trial is designed to determine noninferiority for ischemic outcomes and to assess superiority in reducing major bleeding at 12 months in East Asian patients.

Trial registration: NCT05709626; jRCTs052220145.

背景:先前的随机试验已经证明,与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后12个月的DAPT相比,P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗在急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受1-3个月双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)后的安全性。然而,st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者首次行PCI时启动普拉格雷单药治疗的安全性尚不清楚。方法/设计:PREMIUM(普拉格雷单药治疗经皮冠状动脉介入治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死)试验是一项研究者发起、开放标签、多中心随机对照试验。共有2268名STEMI患者接受了当前一代铂铬依维莫司洗脱支架的原发性PCI,他们被1:1随机分配到PCI前开始的普拉格雷单药治疗(负荷20 mg,每天3.75 mg)或标准的12个月阿司匹林加普拉格雷DAPT。主要终点是12个月时全因死亡、心肌梗死或卒中的综合非劣效性试验。主要的次要终点是出血,学术研究联盟在12个月测试3或5型出血的优势。摘要:PREMIUM试验是第一个大规模随机研究,旨在评估STEMI患者在接受当代成像引导的PCI治疗时,与标准的12个月DAPT相比,采用普拉格雷单药治疗的前期无阿司匹林策略。该试验旨在确定缺血结局的非劣效性,并评估东亚患者在减少12个月大出血方面的优势。试验注册:NCT05709626;jRCTs052220145。
{"title":"Prasugrel monotherapy versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy in STEMI patients undergoing intravascular imaging-guided PCI: Study design and rationale of the randomized PREMIUM trial.","authors":"Kuniaki Takahashi, Ken Kozuma, Yoshihiro Morino, Kosuke Kashiwabara, Hiromasa Otake, Satoru Suwa, Mamoru Nanasato, Takashi Muramatsu, Hitoshi Anzai, Akihiro Shirakabe, Masashi Yamamoto, Yasuhide Asaumi, Masashi Sakuma, Hideki Okayama, Yuji Ikari, Gaku Nakazawa","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous randomized trials have demonstrated the safety of P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor monotherapy after 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with 12-month DAPT following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, the safety of initiating prasugrel monotherapy at the time of primary PCI in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>The PREMIUM (Prasugrel monotherapy following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction) trial is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. A total of 2268 STEMI patients indicated for primary PCI with current generation platinum‑chromium everolimus-eluting stents were randomized 1:1 to either prasugrel monotherapy (20 mg loading, 3.75 mg daily) initiated before PCI or standard 12-month DAPT with aspirin plus prasugrel. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months tested for noninferiority. The major secondary endpoint is Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding at 12 months tested for superiority.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The PREMIUM trial is the first large-scale randomized study to evaluate an upfront aspirin-free strategy with prasugrel monotherapy compared with standard 12-month DAPT in STEMI undergoing contemporary imaging-guided PCI. The trial is designed to determine noninferiority for ischemic outcomes and to assess superiority in reducing major bleeding at 12 months in East Asian patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05709626; jRCTs052220145.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145821640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Durability of balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves in patients with a large aortic annulus. 大主动脉环患者经导管主动脉瓣的球囊膨胀性和自膨胀性耐久性。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.006
Kenichi Ishizu, Shinichi Shirai, Masaomi Hayashi, Toru Morofuji, Akihiro Isotani, Nobuhisa Ohno, Shinichi Kakumoto, Kenji Ando, Masanori Yamamoto, Hirofumi Hioki, Tetsuro Shimura, Fumiaki Yashima, Toru Naganuma, Masahiko Asami, Yohei Ohno, Yusuke Watanabe, Futoshi Yamanaka, Gaku Nakazawa, Masahiko Noguchi, Masaki Izumo, Hidetaka Nishina, Yasushi Fuku, Toshiaki Otsuka, Kentaro Hayashida

Background: Limited evidence has been available on the long-term prognosis and valve durability of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (BE-THV) and self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SE-THV) in patients with large aortic annulus (LAA).

Objectives: To compare the long-term outcomes between the BE-THV and SE-THV.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1054 patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for tricuspid aortic valve stenosis with LAA, defined as an annulus area > 430 mm2, using either a BE-THV (SAPIEN 3, Edwards Life Sciences) or SE-THV (Evolut R/PRO, Medtronic). The 7-year cumulative incidences of all-cause mortality and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) were evaluated in the overall cohort and the propensity score (PS)-matched cohort.

Results: Among the 1054 patients with LAA, 829 (78.7 %) received a BE-THV. The PS-matched population resulted in 218 pairs. The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality 7 years after TAVI was comparable between the BE-THV and SE-THV groups in the overall cohort (58.6 % vs. 67.6 %, log-rank P = 0.848) and the PS-matched cohort (53.2 % vs. 69.9 %, log-rank P = 0.173). In the overall cohort, the BE-THV group demonstrated a lower exposure-adjusted BVF rate as compared with the SE-THV, although the difference was not significant (6.1 vs. 9.6 events per 1000 patient-years, P = 0.258). This trend became pronounced after PS matching (3.3 vs. 9.9 events per 1000 patient-years, P = 0.017), which was also confirmed by Gray's test (P = 0.032).

Conclusions: In the current analysis focusing on patients with LAA, the BE-THV and SE-THV groups had a comparable long-term prognosis, but the BE-THV group had a lower BVF rate than did the SE-THV group.

Clinical trial registration: UMIN000020423.

背景:关于大主动脉环(LAA)患者使用球囊可膨胀经导管心脏瓣膜(BE-THV)和自膨胀经导管心脏瓣膜(SE-THV)的长期预后和瓣膜耐久性的证据有限。目的:比较BE-THV与SE-THV的远期疗效。方法:采用BE-THV (SAPIEN 3, Edwards Life Sciences)或SE-THV (Evolut R/PRO, Medtronic),回顾性分析1054例接受经股经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗伴有LAA的三尖瓣狭窄的患者。在整个队列和倾向评分(PS)匹配的队列中评估了7年全因死亡率和生物假体瓣膜衰竭(BVF)的累积发生率。结果:1054例LAA患者中,829例(78.7%)接受了BE-THV治疗。ps匹配的群体共有218对。TAVI后7年的全因死亡率累积发生率在整个队列中BE-THV组和SE-THV组(58.6%比67.6%,log-rank P = 0.848)和ps匹配组(53.2%比69.9%,log-rank P = 0.173)具有可比性。在整个队列中,与SE-THV组相比,BE-THV组显示出较低的暴露调整BVF率,尽管差异不显著(6.1 vs 9.6事件/ 1000患者年,P = 0.258)。这种趋势在PS匹配后变得明显(3.3 vs 9.9事件/ 1000患者年,P = 0.017),这也被Gray检验证实(P = 0.032)。结论:在目前针对LAA患者的分析中,BE-THV组和SE-THV组的长期预后相当,但BE-THV组的BVF率低于SE-THV组。临床试验注册号:UMIN000020423。
{"title":"Durability of balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves in patients with a large aortic annulus.","authors":"Kenichi Ishizu, Shinichi Shirai, Masaomi Hayashi, Toru Morofuji, Akihiro Isotani, Nobuhisa Ohno, Shinichi Kakumoto, Kenji Ando, Masanori Yamamoto, Hirofumi Hioki, Tetsuro Shimura, Fumiaki Yashima, Toru Naganuma, Masahiko Asami, Yohei Ohno, Yusuke Watanabe, Futoshi Yamanaka, Gaku Nakazawa, Masahiko Noguchi, Masaki Izumo, Hidetaka Nishina, Yasushi Fuku, Toshiaki Otsuka, Kentaro Hayashida","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited evidence has been available on the long-term prognosis and valve durability of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (BE-THV) and self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SE-THV) in patients with large aortic annulus (LAA).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the long-term outcomes between the BE-THV and SE-THV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 1054 patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for tricuspid aortic valve stenosis with LAA, defined as an annulus area > 430 mm<sup>2</sup>, using either a BE-THV (SAPIEN 3, Edwards Life Sciences) or SE-THV (Evolut R/PRO, Medtronic). The 7-year cumulative incidences of all-cause mortality and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) were evaluated in the overall cohort and the propensity score (PS)-matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1054 patients with LAA, 829 (78.7 %) received a BE-THV. The PS-matched population resulted in 218 pairs. The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality 7 years after TAVI was comparable between the BE-THV and SE-THV groups in the overall cohort (58.6 % vs. 67.6 %, log-rank P = 0.848) and the PS-matched cohort (53.2 % vs. 69.9 %, log-rank P = 0.173). In the overall cohort, the BE-THV group demonstrated a lower exposure-adjusted BVF rate as compared with the SE-THV, although the difference was not significant (6.1 vs. 9.6 events per 1000 patient-years, P = 0.258). This trend became pronounced after PS matching (3.3 vs. 9.9 events per 1000 patient-years, P = 0.017), which was also confirmed by Gray's test (P = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the current analysis focusing on patients with LAA, the BE-THV and SE-THV groups had a comparable long-term prognosis, but the BE-THV group had a lower BVF rate than did the SE-THV group.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>UMIN000020423.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intravascular lithotripsy with or without rotational atherectomy for coronary calcific nodule treatment. 血管内碎石伴或不伴旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术治疗冠状动脉钙化结节。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.005
Marco Zuin, Giuseppe Marchese, Ervis Hiso, Andrea Bertolini, Alberto Zamboni, Gianluca Rigatelli

Background: Calcific coronary nodules (CNs) are a challenging form of coronary artery disease, often linked to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and resistant to standard lesion preparation. While intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and rotational atherectomy (RA) are used for plaque modification, the optimal strategy remains unclear. This study compares procedural characteristics and mid-term outcomes of IVL alone versus IVL combined with RA (IVL + RA) in patients with CNs.

Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, 120 patients with angiographically confirmed CNs undergoing PCI were analyzed after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to compare IVL (n = 60) versus IVL + RA (n = 60). Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were collected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 6 months, including cardiovascular death, ACS, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included intraprocedural complications and 30-day outcomes.

Results: Baseline characteristics and lesion complexity were well matched between groups. Procedural success and stent deployment metrics were similar. Rates of intraprocedural complications were low and not significantly different (6.7 % IVL vs. 8.3 % IVL + RA; p = 0.68). At 6 months, MACE rates were comparable (8.3 % vs. 10.3 %; p = 0.68), with no differences in cardiovascular death (5.0 % vs. 6.9 %) or ACS (6.7 % vs. 8.6 %).

Conclusions: In patients with calcific nodules, both IVL alone and the IVL + RA combination showed similar safety and efficacy, with low complication rates and comparable mid-term outcomes. Further randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach for this high-risk group.

背景:钙化性冠状动脉结节(CNs)是一种具有挑战性的冠状动脉疾病,通常与急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)有关,并且对标准病变准备具有抗性。虽然血管内碎石术(IVL)和旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术(RA)用于斑块修饰,但最佳策略尚不清楚。本研究比较了CNs患者单独IVL与IVL联合RA (IVL + RA)的手术特点和中期结果。方法:在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,120例经血管造影证实的中枢神经系统接受PCI的患者采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行分析,比较IVL (n = 60)和IVL + RA (n = 60)。收集临床、血管造影和手术资料。主要终点是6个月时的主要心血管不良事件(MACE),包括心血管死亡、ACS或靶血管重建术。次要终点包括术中并发症和30天预后。结果:两组患者基线特征及病变复杂程度吻合良好。手术成功率和支架部署指标相似。术中并发症发生率低且无显著差异(6.7% IVL vs 8.3% IVL + RA; p = 0.68)。在6个月时,MACE率具有可比性(8.3% vs 10.3%; p = 0.68),心血管死亡(5.0% vs 6.9%)或ACS (6.7% vs 8.6%)无差异。结论:在钙化结节患者中,IVL单用和IVL + RA联合使用的安全性和有效性相似,并发症发生率低,中期预后相当。需要进一步的随机研究来确定这一高危人群的最佳治疗方法。
{"title":"Intravascular lithotripsy with or without rotational atherectomy for coronary calcific nodule treatment.","authors":"Marco Zuin, Giuseppe Marchese, Ervis Hiso, Andrea Bertolini, Alberto Zamboni, Gianluca Rigatelli","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calcific coronary nodules (CNs) are a challenging form of coronary artery disease, often linked to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and resistant to standard lesion preparation. While intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and rotational atherectomy (RA) are used for plaque modification, the optimal strategy remains unclear. This study compares procedural characteristics and mid-term outcomes of IVL alone versus IVL combined with RA (IVL + RA) in patients with CNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, single-center study, 120 patients with angiographically confirmed CNs undergoing PCI were analyzed after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to compare IVL (n = 60) versus IVL + RA (n = 60). Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were collected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 6 months, including cardiovascular death, ACS, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included intraprocedural complications and 30-day outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics and lesion complexity were well matched between groups. Procedural success and stent deployment metrics were similar. Rates of intraprocedural complications were low and not significantly different (6.7 % IVL vs. 8.3 % IVL + RA; p = 0.68). At 6 months, MACE rates were comparable (8.3 % vs. 10.3 %; p = 0.68), with no differences in cardiovascular death (5.0 % vs. 6.9 %) or ACS (6.7 % vs. 8.6 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with calcific nodules, both IVL alone and the IVL + RA combination showed similar safety and efficacy, with low complication rates and comparable mid-term outcomes. Further randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach for this high-risk group.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145752307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Angiographic phenotypes predict FFR/iFR discordance in severe aortic stenosis: A cluster analysis. 血管造影表型预测严重主动脉瓣狭窄的FFR/iFR不一致:聚类分析。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.004
Artur Dziewierz, Barbara Zdzierak, Łukasz Rzeszutko, Łukasz Niewiara, Jacek Legutko, Paweł Kleczyński

Background: Assessing coronary artery disease in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging due to altered hemodynamics, causing discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). The role of angiographic lesion characteristics in predicting this discordance remains unclear.

Objectives: To identify angiographic predictors of FFR/iFR discordance and define distinct angiographic phenotypes using unsupervised machine learning.

Methods: This prospective, single-center registry evaluated 401 intermediate coronary lesions from 221 patients with severe AS (aortic valve area < 1.0 cm2, mean gradient >40 mmHg) using FFR and iFR. Quantitative coronary angiography measured percent diameter stenosis (%DS), lesion length (LL), and other parameters. The primary outcome was FFR/iFR discordance. Receiver operating characteristic and decision curve analyses evaluated %DS predictive utility. K-means clustering was applied to %DS and LL to identify lesion phenotypes.

Results: FFR/iFR discordance occurred in 30 lesions (7.5 %), exclusively as FFR-negative/iFR-positive pattern. Higher %DS was the only independent angiographic predictor of discordance (adjusted OR 1.35 per 10 % increase; 95 % CI 1.12-1.64; p = 0.002), with modest discriminative ability (AUC = 0.69). Cluster analysis identified three phenotypes: Cluster 0 (High %DS [median 75.0 %]/Intermediate LL [median 15.0 mm], n = 103); Cluster 1 (Low %DS [median 49.0 %]/Short-Intermediate LL [median 13.6 mm], n = 220); and Cluster 2 (Intermediate %DS [median 63.5 %]/Long LL [median 32.4 mm], n = 78). Discordance incidence was highest in Cluster 0 (16.5 %) versus Clusters 1 (2.7 %) and 2 (9.0 %) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In severe AS, FFR/iFR discordance manifests solely as FFR-negative/iFR-positive pattern. While %DS modestly predicts this mismatch, unsupervised clustering reveals that "High %DS / Intermediate Length" lesions primarily drive physiological discordance, identifying cases where iFR may overestimate severity due to AS-related hemodynamics.

背景:由于血流动力学的改变,导致血流储备分数(FFR)和瞬时无波比(iFR)之间的不一致,评估严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的冠状动脉疾病具有挑战性。血管造影病变特征在预测这种不一致中的作用尚不清楚。目的:利用无监督机器学习确定FFR/iFR不一致的血管造影预测因子,并定义不同的血管造影表型。方法:采用FFR和iFR对221例严重AS患者(主动脉瓣面积2,平均梯度> - 40mmhg)的401个中间冠状动脉病变进行前瞻性单中心登记。定量冠状动脉造影测量狭窄直径百分比(%DS)、病变长度(LL)和其他参数。主要结局为FFR/iFR不一致。受试者工作特性和决策曲线分析评估了%DS预测效用。对%DS和LL进行k均值聚类分析,确定病变表型。结果:FFR/iFR不一致30例(7.5%),均为FFR阴性/iFR阳性。较高的%DS是唯一独立的血管造影不一致性预测因子(每增加10%调整OR为1.35;95% CI为1.12-1.64;p = 0.002),具有适度的判别能力(AUC = 0.69)。聚类分析鉴定出三种表型:聚类0(高%DS[中位数75.0%]/中级LL[中位数15.0 mm], n = 103);第1组(低%DS[中位数49.0%]/短-中级LL[中位数13.6 mm], n = 220);第2组(Intermediate %DS[中位数63.5%]/Long LL[中位数32.4 mm], n = 78)。不一致发生率最高的是第0组(16.5%),而第1组(2.7%)和第2组(9.0%)(p)。结论:在严重AS中,FFR/iFR不一致仅表现为FFR阴性/iFR阳性模式。虽然%DS适度地预测了这种不匹配,但无监督聚类显示“高%DS /中等长度”病变主要驱动生理不一致,确定iFR可能高估as相关血流动力学严重程度的病例。
{"title":"Angiographic phenotypes predict FFR/iFR discordance in severe aortic stenosis: A cluster analysis.","authors":"Artur Dziewierz, Barbara Zdzierak, Łukasz Rzeszutko, Łukasz Niewiara, Jacek Legutko, Paweł Kleczyński","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing coronary artery disease in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging due to altered hemodynamics, causing discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). The role of angiographic lesion characteristics in predicting this discordance remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify angiographic predictors of FFR/iFR discordance and define distinct angiographic phenotypes using unsupervised machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center registry evaluated 401 intermediate coronary lesions from 221 patients with severe AS (aortic valve area < 1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>, mean gradient >40 mmHg) using FFR and iFR. Quantitative coronary angiography measured percent diameter stenosis (%DS), lesion length (LL), and other parameters. The primary outcome was FFR/iFR discordance. Receiver operating characteristic and decision curve analyses evaluated %DS predictive utility. K-means clustering was applied to %DS and LL to identify lesion phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FFR/iFR discordance occurred in 30 lesions (7.5 %), exclusively as FFR-negative/iFR-positive pattern. Higher %DS was the only independent angiographic predictor of discordance (adjusted OR 1.35 per 10 % increase; 95 % CI 1.12-1.64; p = 0.002), with modest discriminative ability (AUC = 0.69). Cluster analysis identified three phenotypes: Cluster 0 (High %DS [median 75.0 %]/Intermediate LL [median 15.0 mm], n = 103); Cluster 1 (Low %DS [median 49.0 %]/Short-Intermediate LL [median 13.6 mm], n = 220); and Cluster 2 (Intermediate %DS [median 63.5 %]/Long LL [median 32.4 mm], n = 78). Discordance incidence was highest in Cluster 0 (16.5 %) versus Clusters 1 (2.7 %) and 2 (9.0 %) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In severe AS, FFR/iFR discordance manifests solely as FFR-negative/iFR-positive pattern. While %DS modestly predicts this mismatch, unsupervised clustering reveals that \"High %DS / Intermediate Length\" lesions primarily drive physiological discordance, identifying cases where iFR may overestimate severity due to AS-related hemodynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcatheter interventions in adult patients with transposition of the great arteries. 成人大动脉转位的经导管介入治疗。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.002
Raquel Luna-López, Eduardo Flores-Umanzor, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Andrea Ruberti, Sílvia Montserrat, Lusine Abrahamyan, Juan M Carretero Bellón, Leyre Álvarez Rodriguez, Lore Schrutka, Igor Morr-Verenzuela, Susanna Prat-González, Daniel Pereda, Xavier Freixa, Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Matthew J Gillespie, Jamil A Aboulhosn, Lee Benson, Mark Osten, Rafael Alonso-Gonzalez, Eric Horlick

Transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is a complex congenital heart defect with two primary anatomical subtypes: dextro-TGA and levo-TGA. Advances in neonatal surgical techniques, particularly the arterial switch operation, have significantly improved survival rates. However, as this population ages, late complications such as heart failure and valve dysfunction present new clinical challenges. Transcatheter interventions have emerged as valid alternatives to surgical reintervention for these patients, providing effective symptom relief and improved quality of life, reducing the need for repeated sternotomies. As more adults with repaired TGA reach advanced ages, long-term studies are needed to assess the durability and safety of transcatheter therapies. Expanding the indications, refining procedural techniques, and developing specialized devices will be essential in optimizing outcomes for this growing patient population.

大动脉转位(TGA)是一种复杂的先天性心脏缺损,有两种主要的解剖亚型:右旋TGA和左旋TGA。新生儿手术技术的进步,特别是动脉转换手术,显著提高了存活率。然而,随着人口老龄化,晚期并发症如心力衰竭和瓣膜功能障碍提出了新的临床挑战。经导管介入治疗已成为这些患者手术再干预的有效替代方案,可有效缓解症状,提高生活质量,减少重复胸骨切开术的需要。随着越来越多的TGA修复成人进入高龄,需要长期研究来评估经导管治疗的持久性和安全性。扩大适应症,改进手术技术,开发专门的设备将是优化这一不断增长的患者群体的结果的必要条件。
{"title":"Transcatheter interventions in adult patients with transposition of the great arteries.","authors":"Raquel Luna-López, Eduardo Flores-Umanzor, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Andrea Ruberti, Sílvia Montserrat, Lusine Abrahamyan, Juan M Carretero Bellón, Leyre Álvarez Rodriguez, Lore Schrutka, Igor Morr-Verenzuela, Susanna Prat-González, Daniel Pereda, Xavier Freixa, Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Matthew J Gillespie, Jamil A Aboulhosn, Lee Benson, Mark Osten, Rafael Alonso-Gonzalez, Eric Horlick","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is a complex congenital heart defect with two primary anatomical subtypes: dextro-TGA and levo-TGA. Advances in neonatal surgical techniques, particularly the arterial switch operation, have significantly improved survival rates. However, as this population ages, late complications such as heart failure and valve dysfunction present new clinical challenges. Transcatheter interventions have emerged as valid alternatives to surgical reintervention for these patients, providing effective symptom relief and improved quality of life, reducing the need for repeated sternotomies. As more adults with repaired TGA reach advanced ages, long-term studies are needed to assess the durability and safety of transcatheter therapies. Expanding the indications, refining procedural techniques, and developing specialized devices will be essential in optimizing outcomes for this growing patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145752309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Utility of FFR for in-stent restenosis: Biology trumps physiology. 社论:FFR在支架内再狭窄中的应用:生物学胜过生理学。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.003
Morton J Kern, Arnold H Seto
{"title":"Editorial: Utility of FFR for in-stent restenosis: Biology trumps physiology.","authors":"Morton J Kern, Arnold H Seto","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1