Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine最新文献

Background: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) comprise 15 %-20 % of percutaneous coronary procedures and remain a challenge despite advances in stent and interventional techniques. The BioMime™ Branch sirolimus-eluting coronary side-branch stent (BBSES) is specifically designed for CBL treatment in conjunction with a standard drug-eluting stent (DES). We report the first single-center experience of treating complex CBL with the novel BBSES.

Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study involving consecutive prospectively identified patients who underwent treatment of true CBL with the BBSES. The protocol included BBSES+DES implantation in the CBL and simultaneous final kissing balloon inflation.

Results: Fifty-eight CBL were treated in 58 consecutive patients (89.6 % men, mean age 69.0 ± 9.5 years) presenting primarily with stable angina (84.4 %) and true (Medina 1,1,1,) CBL. Procedural success was 100 % without major adverse cardiac events (MACE). At a median follow-up of 18 months, one sudden death was reported that was accounted as possible late stent thrombosis. One patient had spontaneous myocardial infarction due to subacute thrombosis of a DES implanted in the main vessel proximally to the BBSES before the index procedure. Another patient was hospitalized for atrial fibrillation.

Conclusions: This is the first clinical experience to date of true CBL treatment with the BBSES demonstrating high procedural success, no in-hospital MACE and sustained clinical results at a median follow-up of 18 months.

Background: Intima proliferation and in-stent restenosis is a challenging situation in interventional treatment of small vessel obstruction. Al/Al₂O₃ nanowires have been shown to accelerate vascular endothelial cell proliferation and migration in vitro, while suppressing vascular smooth muscle cell growth. Moreover, surface modification of Al/Al₂O₃ nanowires with poly[bis(2,2,2-trifluoromethoxy)phosphazene (PTFEP) coating enables further advantages such as reduced platelet adhesion. Therefore, the study's goal was to compare the biocompatibility of novel Al/Al₂O₃ + PTFEP coated nanowire bare-metal stents to uncoated control stents in vivo using optical coherence tomography (OCT), quantitative angiography and histomorphometric assessment.

Methods: 15 Al/Al₂O₃ + PTFEP coated and 19 control stents were implanted in the cervical arteries of 9 Aachen minipigs. After 90 days, in-stent stenosis, thrombogenicity, and inflammatory response were assessed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyse the stent surface.

Results: OCT analysis revealed that neointimal proliferation in Al/Al₂O₃ + PTFEP coated stents was significantly reduced compared to control stents. The neointimal area was 1.16 ± 0.77 mm² in Al/Al₂O₃ + PTFEP coated stents vs. 1.98 ± 1.04 mm² in control stents (p = 0.004), and the neointimal thickness was 0.28 ± 0.20 vs. 0.47 ± 0.10 (p = 0.003). Quantitative angiography showed a tendency to less neointimal growth in coated stents. Histomorphometry showed no significant difference between the two groups and revealed an apparent inflammatory reaction surrounding the stent struts.

Conclusions: At long-term follow-up, Al/Al₂O₃ + PTFEP coated stents placed in peripheral arteries demonstrated good tolerance with no treatment-associated vascular obstruction and reduced in-stent restenosis in OCT. These preliminary in vivo findings indicate that Al/Al₂O₃ + PTFEP coated nanowire stents may have translational potential to be used for the prevention of in-stent restenosis.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) are associated with increased risk of bleeding events, including hemorrhagic stroke, and periprocedural and gastrointestinal bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) among this patient population has been uncertain with studies showing contradictory results.

Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were queried for studies comparing outcomes among patients with and without significant CKD, and with and without ESRD who underwent LAAO device implantation. Data on outcomes from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed using random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² test.

Results: Data from eleven studies with 61,724 patients with and without kidney disease were included in the final analyses. There was an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.76, 95 % CI [1.15-6.64]; p = 0.02) and peri-procedural bleeding (1.51 [1.33-1.71]; p < 0.01) associated with kidney disease. There was no significant difference in risk of stroke (1.19 [0.70-2.03]; p = 0.53), pericardial effusion (1.22 [0.77-1.92]; p = 0.40), vascular complications (1.18 [0.92-1.52]; p = 0.20), or device related thrombus (1.13 [0.53-2.40]; p = 0.75).

Conclusions: This study shows an increased risk of complications among patients with kidney disease, who undergo LAAO device implantation. These findings suggest the need for studies with randomized control design specifically designed to compare outcomes with LAAO versus anticoagulation in the CKD and ESRD populations.

Background: The optimal strategy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of aneurysmatic right coronary artery (ARCA) remains uncertain and has never been tested in the acute setting.

Objectives: To compare the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of immediate and staged PCI strategies for ARCA as culprit lesions during acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods: Among 102.376 PCIs performed in 18 European centers, a total of 85 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome undergoing ARCA PCI were finally included in the analysis. PCI strategy (stenting performed during the immediate vs staged procedure) and pharmacological approach adopted were collected. The primary outcome was procedural success (technical success without in-hospital MACE).

Results: The primary outcome occurred in 48.2 % of cases, with no significant differences observed between the immediate and staged PCI groups (50.9 % vs 43.3 %, p = 0.504). Patients in the staged-PCI group had a significantly higher rate of intravenous anticoagulant use (83.3 % vs 48.1 %, p = 0.002), BARC type 3 and 5 bleedings (12.9 % vs 1.9 %, p = 0.037), and longer in-hospital stay (7.40 ± 5.11 vs 9.5 ± 5.25 days, p = 0.049). After multivariate analysis, no independent predictors for procedural success were found in either group. Target lesion failure occurred in 24.1 % of cases without differences between groups at a median follow-up of three years.

Conclusions: Among patients undergoing ARCA PCI in the setting of ACS, immediate or staged PCI were associated with similar in-hospital and long-term outcomes. However, staged PCI was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding events and longer length of stay compared to immediate PCI strategy.

Background: The off-label utilization of transcatheter heart valve (THV) devices for the treatment of inoperable or high-surgical risk patients with pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) has demonstrated suboptimal outcomes, both with self- and balloon-expandable (BE) devices. The aim of this study is to compare the use of different BE scaffolds in treating pure NAVR.

Methods: Consecutive patients with pure severe NAVR who were deemed to be at high-risk and were treated with last-generation BE-THVs among seventeen Centers in Europe and US. Technical and device success rates were the primary objectives.

Results: Between February 2018 and July 2023, among 144 patients, 41 (28 %) received a MyVal device and 103 (72 %) were treated with a Sapien THV. Patients treated with a MyVal THV had an extra-large annulus more frequently compared to the Sapien group (49%vs.20 %, p < 0.001). Technical and device success rates were 90 % and 81 %, respectively, p > 0.1. The rate of THV migration/embolization (MyVal 4.9%vs. Sapien 11 %, p = 0.4) and second valve needed (4.9%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.7) were numerically lower in the MyVal group, whereas the rate of at least moderate paravalvular leak (15%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.2) and permanent pacemaker implantation (25%vs.18 %, p = 0.16) were numerically higher in the Myval group.

Conclusions: Off-label use of BE devices for pure NAVR represents a potential alternative in high-risk patients in the absence of dedicated devices. However, BE in NAVR is associated with suboptimal outcomes. The availability of larger THV sizes may introduce transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an effective treatment for patients traditionally deemed unsuitable.

Non-standard abbreviations and acronyms: AR = aortic regurgitation, BE = balloon-expandable, NAVR = native aortic valve regurgitation, PM = pacemaker, TAVR = transcatheter aortic valve replacement, THV = transcatheter heart valve, TVEM = transcatheter valve embolization and migration, VARC-3 = Valve Academic Research Consortium 3.

Background: Evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) can be challenging, particularly in patients with low-gradient (LG, Δp < 40 mmHg) AS.

Objective: This study aims to improve the accuracy of assessing severity of AS using a novel functional index- Aortic Valve Coefficient (AVC). The AVC is defined as ratio of mean transvalvular pressure-drop (Δp) to the proximal dynamic pressure (1/2 × blood density × V_LVOT²; V_LVOT: left ventricular outflow tract peak velocity).

Hypothesis: AVC, developed from fundamental fluid dynamic principles, is a better index for accessing AS severity as it incorporates square of V_LVOT and downstream pressure recovery.

Methods: This pilot prospective study enrolled 47 patients undergoing TAVR for AS. Using cardiac-catheterization-measured Δp and echocardiography-Doppler-derived V_LVOT, AVC was evaluated. Pre- and post-TAVR pressure-velocity measurements were obtained, resulting in a dataset with 78 data points, including 32 data points specifically linked to LG AS. Linear regression analysis was performed to correlate AVC with Δp, V_LVOT and aortic-valve-area. Welch 2-sample t-test was carried out to compare the means of AVC against aortic-valve-area.

Results: Moderate correlation (r = 0.85) was observed between AVC and aortic-valve-area indicating AVC could be a prospective index. However, correlation decreased (r = 0.75) in LG AS patients, indicating increased discordancy. Comparing AVC and aortic-valve-area in LG AS patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % and LVEF ≥50 %, t-test showed that AVC values are significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to aortic-valve-area (p = 0.48).

Conclusion: AVC, a novel index, has the potential to improve assessment of AS severity and clinical decision making for treating patients with AS.

Condensed abstract: Complex hemodynamics, such as paradoxical "low-flow low-gradient (LG)" Aortic stenosis (AS) can be difficult to diagnose. Currently, mean transvalvular pressure-drop and flow-derived aortic-valve-area assess AS severity. Aortic valve coefficient (AVC) is a novel index which combines both pressure-drop and flow measurements to assess the severity of AS. A total of 47 patients (72 data points) were studied undergoing TAVR. In LG AS patients, t-test comparing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % and LVEF ≥50 % showed that AVC are significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to aortic-valve-area (p = 0.48). Therefore, AVC could be a better index.