首页 > 最新文献

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Comment on "vessel-specific angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in an all-comer population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, a PIONEER IV trial substudy". 对“接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有角落人群的血管特异性血管造影衍生的微循环阻力指数,PIONEER IV试验亚研究”的评论。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.007
Kanishka Harariya, Thakur Rohit Singh, Ankita Kalra, Swarupanjali Padhi, Fayaz Ahamed
{"title":"Comment on \"vessel-specific angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in an all-comer population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, a PIONEER IV trial substudy\".","authors":"Kanishka Harariya, Thakur Rohit Singh, Ankita Kalra, Swarupanjali Padhi, Fayaz Ahamed","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: The robot will cath you now. 编辑:机器人现在要追上你了。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.003
Giora Weisz
{"title":"Editorial: The robot will cath you now.","authors":"Giora Weisz","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146120772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Females are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. 女性在心源性休克的机械循环支持的随机对照试验中代表性不足。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.005
John E Connolly, Anushka V Desai, Robert S Weinstein, Craig Cronin, Emily Joseph, Steven Hsu, Faisal Rahman
{"title":"Females are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.","authors":"John E Connolly, Anushka V Desai, Robert S Weinstein, Craig Cronin, Emily Joseph, Steven Hsu, Faisal Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Administration of EAPCI patient video animation versus standard patient information leaflets in the catheterization laboratory: Impact on patient experience assessed using the PATCATH questionnaire. EAPCI患者视频动画与导管室标准患者信息传单的管理:使用PATCATH问卷评估对患者体验的影响。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.004
Himanshu Rai, Katie Kenny Byrne, Daniel O'Callaghan, Rory Durand, J J Coughlan, Roisin Colleran, Mark Kennedy, Gavin J Blake, Colm G Hanratty, Mark S Spence, Robert A Byrne

Background: The Patient Experience in the Catheterization Laboratory (PATCATH) Questionnaire was developed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Intervention (EAPCI) to evaluate patient understanding of coronary catheterization procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare patient experience after coronary catheterization using the PATCATH questionnaire following provision of standard printed patient information leaflets (PILs) and PILs supplemented by specially developed video animations to aid informed consent.

Methods: The PATCATH questionnaire was administered anonymously to patients following coronary catheterization at a single tertiary referral center over two consecutive time periods. The questionnaire comprises 17 questions, divided into 3 domains, assessing patient experience before, during, and after the procedure. During phase 1, standard PILs were provided (PIL group). In phase 2, the PILs were supplemented with videos (PIL+ video group).

Results: The PATCATH tool was administered to a total of 296 patients following cardiac catheterization (22% female, 60.5% aged >65 years). 213 patients were included in the PIL group and 83 in the PIL + video group. Overall, positive patient satisfaction was reported in each domain. Positive patient satisfaction was comparable in both the PIL and the PIL+ video group in all 3 domains (before: 96.7% versus 100%, p = 0.20; during: 96.3% versus 97.3%, p > 0.99; after: 98.6% versus 97.6%, p = 0.62).

Conclusions: The use of a video animation in addition to a PIL when performing informed consent did not result in an increase in patient satisfaction as assessed by the PATCATH questionnaire.

背景:欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)开发了导管实验室(PATCATH)患者体验问卷,以评估患者对冠状动脉导管手术的理解。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较冠状动脉导管置管后的患者体验,使用PATCATH问卷,提供标准的打印患者信息传单(pil)和专门开发的视频动画补充的pil,以帮助知情同意。方法:连续两个时间段内,在单一三级转诊中心接受冠状动脉导管置入术的患者匿名接受PATCATH问卷调查。问卷包括17个问题,分为3个领域,评估患者在手术前、手术中和手术后的体验。在第一阶段,提供标准PIL (PIL组)。第2期:在PIL的基础上添加视频(PIL+视频组)。结果:共有296例心导管术后患者使用了PATCATH工具(22%为女性,60.5%为年龄在0 ~ 65岁之间)。PIL组213例,PIL + video组83例。总体而言,每个领域都报告了积极的患者满意度。在所有3个领域中,PIL组和PIL+ video组的阳性患者满意度具有可比性(治疗前:96.7% vs 100%, p = 0.20;治疗期间:96.3% vs 97.3%, p = 0.99;治疗后:98.6% vs 97.6%, p = 0.62)。结论:根据PATCATH问卷的评估,在执行知情同意时使用视频动画和PIL并没有导致患者满意度的增加。
{"title":"Administration of EAPCI patient video animation versus standard patient information leaflets in the catheterization laboratory: Impact on patient experience assessed using the PATCATH questionnaire.","authors":"Himanshu Rai, Katie Kenny Byrne, Daniel O'Callaghan, Rory Durand, J J Coughlan, Roisin Colleran, Mark Kennedy, Gavin J Blake, Colm G Hanratty, Mark S Spence, Robert A Byrne","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patient Experience in the Catheterization Laboratory (PATCATH) Questionnaire was developed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Intervention (EAPCI) to evaluate patient understanding of coronary catheterization procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare patient experience after coronary catheterization using the PATCATH questionnaire following provision of standard printed patient information leaflets (PILs) and PILs supplemented by specially developed video animations to aid informed consent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PATCATH questionnaire was administered anonymously to patients following coronary catheterization at a single tertiary referral center over two consecutive time periods. The questionnaire comprises 17 questions, divided into 3 domains, assessing patient experience before, during, and after the procedure. During phase 1, standard PILs were provided (PIL group). In phase 2, the PILs were supplemented with videos (PIL+ video group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PATCATH tool was administered to a total of 296 patients following cardiac catheterization (22% female, 60.5% aged >65 years). 213 patients were included in the PIL group and 83 in the PIL + video group. Overall, positive patient satisfaction was reported in each domain. Positive patient satisfaction was comparable in both the PIL and the PIL+ video group in all 3 domains (before: 96.7% versus 100%, p = 0.20; during: 96.3% versus 97.3%, p > 0.99; after: 98.6% versus 97.6%, p = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a video animation in addition to a PIL when performing informed consent did not result in an increase in patient satisfaction as assessed by the PATCATH questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interventional cardiology training and the match. 介入心脏病学训练与比赛。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.002
Spencer B King
{"title":"Interventional cardiology training and the match.","authors":"Spencer B King","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145994660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristic adverse events with the arrow® AC3™ optimus™ intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP): an analysis of the U.S. food and drug administration MAUDE database from 2017 to 2025. arrow®AC3™optimus™主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)的特发性不良事件:2017年至2025年美国食品和药物管理局MAUDE数据库的分析
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.001
Own Khraisat, Triston Messer, Waleed Ismail, Ahmad Alqaseer, Hashem Samardali, Ehab Alkhawaldeh, Farishta Saifi, Dipal Patel, Pranaychandra Vaidya

Background: The Arrow® AC3™ Optimus™ Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) is widely used for hemodynamic support in critically ill patients. Post-marketing surveillance data are essential to assess real-world safety and performance.

Methods: We conducted a systematic analysis of medical device reports related to the AC3™ Optimus™ IABP submitted to the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database between 2017 and 2025. Events were categorized into types of adverse events, device problems, and patient problems. Frequencies and proportions were calculated.

Results: A total of 920 adverse events were identified. The majority were malfunctions (901, 97.9 %), followed by injuries (16, 1.7 %) and deaths (3, 0.3 %). Two of the reported deaths were reviewed in detail but were not clearly attributable to the device. Device problems (n = 1054) were most commonly related to the alarm system (146, 13.9 %), battery (126, 12.0 %), and gas/air leaks (101, 9.6 %). Other frequent issues included power problems (61, 5.8 %), connection problems (70, 6.6 %), and mechanical problems (53, 5.0 %). Patient problems were reported in 12 cases, with hypotension (2, 16.7 %), arrhythmia (1, 8.3 %), cardiac arrest (1, 8.3 %), hemorrhage (1, 8.3 %), and death (1, 8.3 %) among the documented outcomes. The majority of excluded patient problem reports (911, 98.7 %) lacked clinical details or showed no symptoms.

Conclusions: Most reported adverse events with the AC3™ Optimus™ IABP involved device malfunctions rather than direct patient injury or death. The most frequent device-related issues involved the alarm system, battery function, and gas/air leaks. While direct causality between device use and patient deaths was not established, vigilance in monitoring, device maintenance, and user training remains crucial to minimize risk.

背景:Arrow®AC3™Optimus™主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)广泛用于危重患者的血流动力学支持。上市后监测数据对于评估真实世界的安全性和性能至关重要。方法:我们对2017年至2025年间提交给FDA制造商和用户设施设备体验(MAUDE)数据库的与AC3™Optimus™IABP相关的医疗器械报告进行了系统分析。事件被分类为不良事件、器械问题和患者问题。计算频率和比例。结果:共发现920例不良事件。大多数是故障(901,97.9%),其次是伤害(16,1.7%)和死亡(3,0.3%)。报告中的两例死亡经过详细审查,但不能明确归因于该装置。设备问题(n = 1054)最常与报警系统(146,13.9%)、电池(126,12.0%)和气体/空气泄漏(101,9.6%)相关。其他常见问题包括电源问题(61,5.8%),连接问题(70,6.6%)和机械问题(53,5.0%)。报告了12例患者的问题,在记录的结果中出现低血压(2,16.7%)、心律失常(1,8.3%)、心脏骤停(1,8.3%)、出血(1,8.3%)和死亡(1,8.3%)。大多数被排除的患者问题报告(911例,98.7%)缺乏临床细节或无症状。结论:大多数报告的AC3™Optimus™IABP不良事件涉及设备故障,而不是直接的患者伤害或死亡。最常见的设备相关问题包括报警系统、电池功能和气体/空气泄漏。虽然设备使用与患者死亡之间的直接因果关系尚未确定,但在监测、设备维护和用户培训方面保持警惕对于最大限度地降低风险仍然至关重要。
{"title":"Characteristic adverse events with the arrow® AC3™ optimus™ intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP): an analysis of the U.S. food and drug administration MAUDE database from 2017 to 2025.","authors":"Own Khraisat, Triston Messer, Waleed Ismail, Ahmad Alqaseer, Hashem Samardali, Ehab Alkhawaldeh, Farishta Saifi, Dipal Patel, Pranaychandra Vaidya","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Arrow® AC3™ Optimus™ Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) is widely used for hemodynamic support in critically ill patients. Post-marketing surveillance data are essential to assess real-world safety and performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic analysis of medical device reports related to the AC3™ Optimus™ IABP submitted to the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database between 2017 and 2025. Events were categorized into types of adverse events, device problems, and patient problems. Frequencies and proportions were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 920 adverse events were identified. The majority were malfunctions (901, 97.9 %), followed by injuries (16, 1.7 %) and deaths (3, 0.3 %). Two of the reported deaths were reviewed in detail but were not clearly attributable to the device. Device problems (n = 1054) were most commonly related to the alarm system (146, 13.9 %), battery (126, 12.0 %), and gas/air leaks (101, 9.6 %). Other frequent issues included power problems (61, 5.8 %), connection problems (70, 6.6 %), and mechanical problems (53, 5.0 %). Patient problems were reported in 12 cases, with hypotension (2, 16.7 %), arrhythmia (1, 8.3 %), cardiac arrest (1, 8.3 %), hemorrhage (1, 8.3 %), and death (1, 8.3 %) among the documented outcomes. The majority of excluded patient problem reports (911, 98.7 %) lacked clinical details or showed no symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most reported adverse events with the AC3™ Optimus™ IABP involved device malfunctions rather than direct patient injury or death. The most frequent device-related issues involved the alarm system, battery function, and gas/air leaks. While direct causality between device use and patient deaths was not established, vigilance in monitoring, device maintenance, and user training remains crucial to minimize risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145945552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with intra-aortic balloon pump versus microaxial flow pump. 主动脉内球囊泵与微轴流泵治疗急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的临床疗效比较。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.023
Beni Rai Verma, Abhinav Sood, Kalyan Chitturi, Abdullah Al Qaraghuli, Dan Haberman, Cheng Zhang, Sevket T Ozturk, Vaishnavi Sawant, Yama Thakkar, Jason Galo, Waiel Abusnina, Itsik Ben-Dor, Brian C Case, Hayder Hashim, Ron Waksman
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Danish-German (DanGer) Shock trial demonstrated that the use of a microaxial flow pump (Impella) reduced mortality compared to medical management in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS). However, patients in the control arm of the DanGer Shock trial were not treated with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and data directly comparing Impella to IABP in this population is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified STEMI-CS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and IABP at our institution between January 1, 2013, and February 20, 2025. These patients were screened according to the selection criteria of the DanGer Shock trial and were compared to the Impella MCS device 2.5 or CP and standard-of-medical-care (SoMC) arms of the DanGer Shock trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 102 STEMI-CS patients treated with IABP. Compared to Impella CP patients from the DanGer Shock trial, IABP patients had significantly higher rates of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and SCAI stage E cardiogenic shock, but significantly lower rates of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, and inotrope use. At 180 days, IABP patients had similar all-cause mortality compared to Impella CP patients (35.9 % vs. 45.8 %, p = 0.06), and lower rates of major bleeding (6 % vs. 39 %, p < 0.001) and renal replacement therapy (8 % vs. 75 %, p < 0.001). Additionally, IABP patients had lower mortality compared to SoMC patients (35.9 % vs. 58.5 %, p = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the hypothesis that STEMI-CS patients treated with IABP have comparable 180-day mortality to those treated with Impella CP and lower mortality than those receiving standard medical care. STEMI-CS cohort is heterogenous and IABP use may be beneficial in certain patients. Well-designed randomized trials comparing Impella CP and IABP in this patient population are warranted to inform clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Condensed abstract: </strong>Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) portends a high mortality risk. New American guidelines now recommend a peripherally inserted left ventricular assist device, such as Impella, as a Class II indication for the management of STEMI-CS patients. Further, guidelines now give intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as a class III indication for these patients. However, there is a need of direct head-to-head comparison of these two mechanical support modalities in this specific subset of patients. In this analysis, we identified STEMI-CS patients treated with IABP at our institution and compared them to the Impella CP cohort from the DanGer Shock trial. We found that both modalities had similar mortality rates, and IABP has lower mortality rates when compared to standard medical cohort from the trial. However, despite applying
背景:丹麦-德国(DanGer)休克试验表明,与药物治疗相比,使用微轴流泵(Impella)可降低急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克(STEMI-CS)患者的死亡率。然而,在危险休克试验的对照组中,患者没有接受主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)治疗,在该人群中直接比较Impella和IABP的数据有限。方法:选取2013年1月1日至2025年2月20日在我院接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和IABP治疗的STEMI-CS患者。根据危险休克试验的选择标准筛选这些患者,并将其与危险休克试验的Impella MCS装置2.5或CP和标准医疗护理(SoMC)组进行比较。结果:我们的队列包括102例接受IABP治疗的STEMI-CS患者。与来自DanGer Shock试验的Impella CP患者相比,IABP患者的高血压、糖尿病、心力衰竭和SCAI E期心源性休克的发生率明显较高,但机械通气、血管加压药和肌力药物的使用率明显较低。180天时,IABP患者的全因死亡率与Impella CP患者相似(35.9% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.06),大出血率更低(6% vs. 39%, p)。结论:这些发现支持STEMI-CS患者接受IABP治疗的180天死亡率与Impella CP治疗的患者相当,死亡率低于接受标准医疗护理的患者。STEMI-CS队列是异质性的,使用IABP可能对某些患者有益。设计良好的随机试验比较Impella CP和IABP在该患者群体中有必要为临床决策提供信息。摘要:急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克(STEMI-CS)具有较高的死亡风险。新的美国指南现在推荐外周插入的左心室辅助装置,如Impella,作为STEMI-CS患者治疗的II级指证。此外,指南现在将主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)作为这些患者的III级指征。然而,在这一特定的患者群体中,需要对这两种机械支持方式进行直接的比较。在本分析中,我们确定了我院接受IABP治疗的STEMI-CS患者,并将其与来自DanGer Shock试验的Impella CP队列进行了比较。我们发现两种方式的死亡率相似,与试验中的标准医学队列相比,IABP的死亡率更低。然而,尽管应用了危险休克选择标准,组间差异仍然存在。与Impella CP相比,IABP的并发症发生率更低。这些发现支持IABP在某些STEMI-CS患者的治疗中使用,其临床应用不应被低估。
{"title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with intra-aortic balloon pump versus microaxial flow pump.","authors":"Beni Rai Verma, Abhinav Sood, Kalyan Chitturi, Abdullah Al Qaraghuli, Dan Haberman, Cheng Zhang, Sevket T Ozturk, Vaishnavi Sawant, Yama Thakkar, Jason Galo, Waiel Abusnina, Itsik Ben-Dor, Brian C Case, Hayder Hashim, Ron Waksman","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.023","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The Danish-German (DanGer) Shock trial demonstrated that the use of a microaxial flow pump (Impella) reduced mortality compared to medical management in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS). However, patients in the control arm of the DanGer Shock trial were not treated with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and data directly comparing Impella to IABP in this population is limited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We identified STEMI-CS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and IABP at our institution between January 1, 2013, and February 20, 2025. These patients were screened according to the selection criteria of the DanGer Shock trial and were compared to the Impella MCS device 2.5 or CP and standard-of-medical-care (SoMC) arms of the DanGer Shock trial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Our cohort included 102 STEMI-CS patients treated with IABP. Compared to Impella CP patients from the DanGer Shock trial, IABP patients had significantly higher rates of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and SCAI stage E cardiogenic shock, but significantly lower rates of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, and inotrope use. At 180 days, IABP patients had similar all-cause mortality compared to Impella CP patients (35.9 % vs. 45.8 %, p = 0.06), and lower rates of major bleeding (6 % vs. 39 %, p &lt; 0.001) and renal replacement therapy (8 % vs. 75 %, p &lt; 0.001). Additionally, IABP patients had lower mortality compared to SoMC patients (35.9 % vs. 58.5 %, p = 0.0004).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;These findings support the hypothesis that STEMI-CS patients treated with IABP have comparable 180-day mortality to those treated with Impella CP and lower mortality than those receiving standard medical care. STEMI-CS cohort is heterogenous and IABP use may be beneficial in certain patients. Well-designed randomized trials comparing Impella CP and IABP in this patient population are warranted to inform clinical decision-making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Condensed abstract: &lt;/strong&gt;Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) portends a high mortality risk. New American guidelines now recommend a peripherally inserted left ventricular assist device, such as Impella, as a Class II indication for the management of STEMI-CS patients. Further, guidelines now give intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as a class III indication for these patients. However, there is a need of direct head-to-head comparison of these two mechanical support modalities in this specific subset of patients. In this analysis, we identified STEMI-CS patients treated with IABP at our institution and compared them to the Impella CP cohort from the DanGer Shock trial. We found that both modalities had similar mortality rates, and IABP has lower mortality rates when compared to standard medical cohort from the trial. However, despite applying","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145994657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hybrid (DES + DCB) strategy for chronic total occlusions: Development of the GLOW risk stratification score. 慢性全闭塞的混合(DES + DCB)策略:GLOW风险分层评分的发展
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.024
Ehab Cherif, Husam Abdulaziz Noor

Background: Hybrid drug-eluting stent/drug-coated balloon percutaneous coronary intervention (DES-DCB PCI) aims to minimize stent burden while maintaining patency in chronic total occlusion lesions.

Methods: We prospectively studied 19 consecutive CTO patients treated with a hybrid DES-DCB strategy; primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at 3-4 months, with secondary clinical outcomes at six months.

Results: Technical success was 89.5 %; mean LLL was 0.10 ± 0.83 mm; late lumen gain occurred in ~53 % of patients completing angiographic follow-up; binary restenosis was 10.5 %. Residual stenosis strongly predicted LLL, while optimal DCB sizing and inflation ≥180 s were protective; residual stenosis remained the independent predictor in multivariable regression. IVUS guidance was associated with 0 % restenosis.

Conclusions: Hybrid DES-DCB PCI for CTOs was feasible with low LLL. Outcomes hinged on lesion preparation, sizing, and inflation duration. The six-component GLOW score provides intra-procedural risk stratification and warrants multicenter validation.

背景:混合药物洗脱支架/药物包被球囊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(DES-DCB PCI)旨在减少支架负担,同时保持慢性全闭塞病变的通畅。方法:前瞻性研究19例连续接受DES-DCB混合治疗的CTO患者;主要终点是3-4个月时的晚期管腔损失(LLL), 6个月时的次要临床结果。结果:技术成功率89.5%;平均LLL为0.10±0.83 mm;在完成血管造影随访的患者中,约53%的患者出现了晚期管腔增加;二元再狭窄为10.5%。残余狭窄对LLL有较强的预测作用,而最佳DCB尺寸和膨胀≥180 s具有保护作用;在多变量回归中,残余狭窄仍然是独立的预测因子。IVUS指导与0%的再狭窄相关。结论:混合DES-DCB PCI治疗低LLL的CTOs是可行的。结果取决于病变准备、大小和膨胀持续时间。六组分GLOW评分提供了手术内风险分层,需要多中心验证。
{"title":"Hybrid (DES + DCB) strategy for chronic total occlusions: Development of the GLOW risk stratification score.","authors":"Ehab Cherif, Husam Abdulaziz Noor","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hybrid drug-eluting stent/drug-coated balloon percutaneous coronary intervention (DES-DCB PCI) aims to minimize stent burden while maintaining patency in chronic total occlusion lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively studied 19 consecutive CTO patients treated with a hybrid DES-DCB strategy; primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at 3-4 months, with secondary clinical outcomes at six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success was 89.5 %; mean LLL was 0.10 ± 0.83 mm; late lumen gain occurred in ~53 % of patients completing angiographic follow-up; binary restenosis was 10.5 %. Residual stenosis strongly predicted LLL, while optimal DCB sizing and inflation ≥180 s were protective; residual stenosis remained the independent predictor in multivariable regression. IVUS guidance was associated with 0 % restenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid DES-DCB PCI for CTOs was feasible with low LLL. Outcomes hinged on lesion preparation, sizing, and inflation duration. The six-component GLOW score provides intra-procedural risk stratification and warrants multicenter validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145949376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Incorporating pulmonary embolism in a unified classification of shock. 社论:将肺栓塞纳入休克的统一分类。
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.028
Tanveer Rab, Bryan Kindya
{"title":"Editorial: Incorporating pulmonary embolism in a unified classification of shock.","authors":"Tanveer Rab, Bryan Kindya","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145945626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do we still need routine pre-discharge echocardiography after LAAC? LAAC术后还需要常规出院前超声心动图吗?
IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.025
Mehmet Cilingiroglu, Ibrahim Inanc
{"title":"Do we still need routine pre-discharge echocardiography after LAAC?","authors":"Mehmet Cilingiroglu, Ibrahim Inanc","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.12.025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1