Objective: Persons who cope with serious mental illness (SMI) without immediate physical risk to themselves or others have the right to refuse to be treated. Treatment refusal has implications not only for the individual but also for the family, especially the primary caregivers. Still, less is known about the phenomenon of family burden while coping with a situation where the family member with SMI refuses treatment and lives in the community. The present study aimed to understand and describe the caregivers' lived experience of family burden in the context of treatment refusal among their relatives.
Methods: Using a descriptive phenomenological qualitative approach and a semi-structured interview guide, 15 family caregivers of persons with SMI refusing to receive medicinal treatment and rehabilitation services were interviewed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on the interview transcripts.
Results: The caregivers described a complex experience of ongoing and intense burden that had a negative impact on the family cohesion and the caregivers' well-being. Four themes related to the perceived reasons for treatment refusal, the caregivers' experience of the family burden and cohesion, and coping with this situation were identified.
Conclusions and implications for practice: The findings demonstrate the unique family burden experienced by the caregivers, mainly as they are the only ones supporting the individual with SMI who refuses treatment. Practitioners should support these families throughout their coping process-from understanding the reasons for the refusal of treatment to continuous support in their daily coping by locating the control of the situation on the family level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"\"It's like a kind of chronic pain that goes with you\": Understanding the phenomenon of family burden as experienced by primary caregivers of persons with serious mental illness who refuse treatment.","authors":"Carmit-Noa Shpigelman, Netta Galimidi, Matat Kal","doi":"10.1037/prj0000613","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000613","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Persons who cope with serious mental illness (SMI) without immediate physical risk to themselves or others have the right to refuse to be treated. Treatment refusal has implications not only for the individual but also for the family, especially the primary caregivers. Still, less is known about the phenomenon of family burden while coping with a situation where the family member with SMI refuses treatment and lives in the community. The present study aimed to understand and describe the caregivers' lived experience of family burden in the context of treatment refusal among their relatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a descriptive phenomenological qualitative approach and a semi-structured interview guide, 15 family caregivers of persons with SMI refusing to receive medicinal treatment and rehabilitation services were interviewed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on the interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The caregivers described a complex experience of ongoing and intense burden that had a negative impact on the family cohesion and the caregivers' well-being. Four themes related to the perceived reasons for treatment refusal, the caregivers' experience of the family burden and cohesion, and coping with this situation were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>The findings demonstrate the unique family burden experienced by the caregivers, mainly as they are the only ones supporting the individual with SMI who refuses treatment. Practitioners should support these families throughout their coping process-from understanding the reasons for the refusal of treatment to continuous support in their daily coping by locating the control of the situation on the family level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jesse Gates, Carli Ellinghaus, Lee Valentine, Ilias Kamitsis, Alexandra Stainton, Susy Harrigan, Andrew Thompson, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Stephen Wood, Andrea Polari, John F Gleeson, Cali Bartholomeusz, Kelly Allott, Eóin Killackey, Sarah Bendall
Objective: The current guidelines recommend continuation of antipsychotic medication for a minimum of at least 1 year following a first episode of psychosis (FEP). There have been several trials investigating whether early dose reduction or cessation leads to improved functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of consenting to and participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of antipsychotic medication cessation.
Method: Five participants in the Reduce trial-an RCT evaluating early antipsychotic medication dose reduction/cessation following FEP-aged 22-24 years completed a semistructured qualitative interview following the RCT. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was undertaken to understand the key themes.
Results: A superordinate theme was derived from interviews: the Liminal Space of FEP and treatment. Themes within the Liminal Space included: rejection versus identification with psychosis, medication as symbolic of illness versus wellness, embodiment of wellness and illness with medication, medication as symbolic of independence versus dependence, discovery of independence when autonomously choosing medication, the Reduce trial offered safety to navigate the liminal space, and self-exploration versus altruism.
Conclusions and implications for practice: The experience and treatment of FEP involves young people feeling torn between multiple, competing perspectives, demands, and priorities. Participation in an RCT exploring dose reduction provided additional supports contributing to the perception of greater safety to navigate their own experiences of treatment that was appropriate for them. When treatment is experienced as collaborative, involves shared decision making and support, other than medication, young people feel more equipped to navigate the liminal space. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The liminal space of first-episode psychosis and its treatment: A qualitative study exploring the experience of young people participating in an antipsychotic dose reduction randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jesse Gates, Carli Ellinghaus, Lee Valentine, Ilias Kamitsis, Alexandra Stainton, Susy Harrigan, Andrew Thompson, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Stephen Wood, Andrea Polari, John F Gleeson, Cali Bartholomeusz, Kelly Allott, Eóin Killackey, Sarah Bendall","doi":"10.1037/prj0000606","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current guidelines recommend continuation of antipsychotic medication for a minimum of at least 1 year following a first episode of psychosis (FEP). There have been several trials investigating whether early dose reduction or cessation leads to improved functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of consenting to and participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of antipsychotic medication cessation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five participants in the Reduce trial-an RCT evaluating early antipsychotic medication dose reduction/cessation following FEP-aged 22-24 years completed a semistructured qualitative interview following the RCT. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was undertaken to understand the key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A superordinate theme was derived from interviews: the Liminal Space of FEP and treatment. Themes within the Liminal Space included: rejection versus identification with psychosis, medication as symbolic of illness versus wellness, embodiment of wellness and illness with medication, medication as symbolic of independence versus dependence, discovery of independence when autonomously choosing medication, the Reduce trial offered safety to navigate the liminal space, and self-exploration versus altruism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>The experience and treatment of FEP involves young people feeling torn between multiple, competing perspectives, demands, and priorities. Participation in an RCT exploring dose reduction provided additional supports contributing to the perception of greater safety to navigate their own experiences of treatment that was appropriate for them. When treatment is experienced as collaborative, involves shared decision making and support, other than medication, young people feel more equipped to navigate the liminal space. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shinichi Nagata, Shintaro Kono, Kimiko Tanaka, Koji Ota, Emi Hirasawa, Daisuke Kato
Objective: Ikigai is a Japanese concept of a life worth living and related to eudaimonic well-being. Supporting the pursuit of ikigai is of central importance to recovery-oriented psychiatric rehabilitation for people with serious mental illnesses (SMI). While research suggests that work, leisure, and social relationships are potential sources of ikigai, people with SMI have restricted access to these as they encounter systemic barriers to participating in such activities. This study investigated how people with SMI in Japan pursued sources of ikigai in the face of barriers.
Methods: A total of 21 community-living individuals who had SMI and were recruited from community psychiatric rehabilitation service providers in Japan participated in the study. Photo-elicitation interviews were conducted, and the interview transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: Three themes were generated: (a) self-determination as a key to ikigai, (b) explorations needed to identify sources of ikigai, and (c) navigating the challenges to engage in the explorations. It was found that a self-determined activity tends to be a source of ikigai. However, participants had to grapple with challenges because identifying a source of ikigai involved the exploration of their personal interests, and the exploration could not be continued without managing the stigma of mental illness.
Conclusions and implications for practice: Results suggest that ikigai cannot be achieved instantly. To achieve eudaimonic well-being outcomes, psychiatric rehabilitation professionals should allow consumers to choose activities based on their personal interests and encourage them to try out various activities while they provide continued support to overcome stigma. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Exploring interests: A pathway to ikigai and eudaimonic well-being among people with serious mental illness.","authors":"Shinichi Nagata, Shintaro Kono, Kimiko Tanaka, Koji Ota, Emi Hirasawa, Daisuke Kato","doi":"10.1037/prj0000620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ikigai is a Japanese concept of a life worth living and related to eudaimonic well-being. Supporting the pursuit of <i>ikigai</i> is of central importance to recovery-oriented psychiatric rehabilitation for people with serious mental illnesses (SMI). While research suggests that work, leisure, and social relationships are potential sources of <i>ikigai</i>, people with SMI have restricted access to these as they encounter systemic barriers to participating in such activities. This study investigated how people with SMI in Japan pursued sources of <i>ikigai</i> in the face of barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 21 community-living individuals who had SMI and were recruited from community psychiatric rehabilitation service providers in Japan participated in the study. Photo-elicitation interviews were conducted, and the interview transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were generated: (a) self-determination as a key to <i>ikigai</i>, (b) explorations needed to identify sources of <i>ikigai</i>, and (c) navigating the challenges to engage in the explorations. It was found that a self-determined activity tends to be a source of <i>ikigai</i>. However, participants had to grapple with challenges because identifying a source of <i>ikigai</i> involved the exploration of their personal interests, and the exploration could not be continued without managing the stigma of mental illness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Results suggest that <i>ikigai</i> cannot be achieved instantly. To achieve eudaimonic well-being outcomes, psychiatric rehabilitation professionals should allow consumers to choose activities based on their personal interests and encourage them to try out various activities while they provide continued support to overcome stigma. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Astrid Meyer, Stephen F Austin, Tobias Vitger, Lisa Korsbek
Objective: This study explores the experiences of young adults with psychosis using a smartphone application to promote patient activation and support shared decision making in their outpatient treatment.
Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted with eight participants who had access to the app while receiving mental health treatment. Qualitative data from the interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis aimed at experiences of interacting with the app.
Results: Four themes were extracted from the interviews: supporting users with memory difficulties, giving symptoms substance, a new source of information to guide conversations, and the challenge of capturing complex experiences digitally. While the majority of the themes highlight the benefits of using the app in ways that may facilitate communication between patient and provider, the participants also described some negative experiences when interacting with the app concerning failure to communicate nuances and emotional states satisfyingly.
Conclusion and implications for practice: Experiences with the app were double sided. On the one hand, the use of the app supports communication, and conversely, interaction with the app can create limitations and new challenges for communication. There is a need for more research to understand the use of mental health smartphone apps and their role in supporting interactive processes such as shared decision making in mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
研究目的本研究探讨了患有精神病的年轻人在门诊治疗过程中使用智能手机应用程序促进患者积极性和支持共同决策的经验:对八名在接受精神健康治疗期间使用过该应用程序的参与者进行了半结构式访谈。采用主题分析法对访谈中的定性数据进行了分析,旨在了解与应用程序互动的体验:从访谈中提取了四个主题:为有记忆障碍的用户提供支持、赋予症状实质意义、引导对话的新信息来源以及以数字方式捕捉复杂体验所面临的挑战。虽然大多数主题都强调了使用该应用程序的好处,即可以促进患者和医疗服务提供者之间的沟通,但参与者也描述了在与该应用程序互动时的一些负面体验,即无法令人满意地传达细微差别和情绪状态:使用该应用程序的体验是双面的。一方面,应用程序的使用支持了沟通,另一方面,与应用程序的互动也会给沟通带来限制和新的挑战。有必要开展更多研究,以了解心理健康智能手机应用程序的使用情况及其在支持互动过程(如心理健康共同决策)中的作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"\"I was able to share more details\": The experiences of using a smartphone application to support shared decision making in young people with psychosis.","authors":"Astrid Meyer, Stephen F Austin, Tobias Vitger, Lisa Korsbek","doi":"10.1037/prj0000616","DOIUrl":"10.1037/prj0000616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores the experiences of young adults with psychosis using a smartphone application to promote patient activation and support shared decision making in their outpatient treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with eight participants who had access to the app while receiving mental health treatment. Qualitative data from the interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis aimed at experiences of interacting with the app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were extracted from the interviews: <i>supporting users with memory difficulties, giving symptoms substance, a new source of information to guide conversations,</i> and <i>the challenge of capturing complex experiences digitally.</i> While the majority of the themes highlight the benefits of using the app in ways that may facilitate communication between patient and provider, the participants also described some negative experiences when interacting with the app concerning failure to communicate nuances and emotional states satisfyingly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications for practice: </strong>Experiences with the app were double sided. On the one hand, the use of the app supports communication, and conversely, interaction with the app can create limitations and new challenges for communication. There is a need for more research to understand the use of mental health smartphone apps and their role in supporting interactive processes such as shared decision making in mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-02-15DOI: 10.1037/prj0000602
Patrick W Corrigan, Miranda Twiss, Katherine Nieweglowski, Lindsay Sheehan
Objective: Traumatic experiences are prevalent among people with serious mental illness and can significantly worsen outcomes. This study aimed to identify an urban cluster of trauma types, compare continuous distress ratings versus categorical experience of trauma for predicting outcomes such as depression and quality of life, and investigate the mediating role of recovery orientation in the impact of trauma exposure on outcomes.
Method: Data came from an intervention study on African Americans with serious mental illness living in a large urban area; 212 participants completed baseline self-report measures of past trauma experiences, related distress levels, recovery, depression, and quality of life. Data were assessed using correlations and regressive path modeling.
Results: Overall, 56.6% of participants reported experiences with trauma. Analyses suggested an urban cluster of trauma types that was self-reported by over 25% of participants. Distress due to trauma strongly correlated with greater depression as well as reduced quality of life and recovery. Interestingly, the categorical presence of trauma history (yes/no) had no significant relationship with any outcomes. Path analyses revealed that recovery mediated the impact of trauma distress on depression and quality of life, specifically implicating the recovery subfactor of hope.
Conclusions and implications for practice: Results suggested that cognitive reframing focused on positive appraisals of overall recovery, and the hope subfactor can have a positive influence on trauma outcomes. The study supported the role of recovery in posttraumatic growth and suggests that hope can be used to help patients process trauma healthily. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:创伤经历在重性精神病患者中非常普遍,而且会严重恶化治疗效果。本研究旨在确定一个城市创伤类型集群,比较连续痛苦评级与分类创伤经历对抑郁和生活质量等结果的预测作用,并调查康复取向在创伤暴露对结果的影响中的中介作用:数据来源于一项针对生活在大城市地区患有严重精神疾病的非裔美国人的干预研究;212 名参与者完成了对过去创伤经历、相关痛苦程度、康复、抑郁和生活质量的基线自我报告测量。采用相关性和回归路径模型对数据进行了评估:总体而言,56.6%的参与者报告了创伤经历。分析表明,超过 25% 的参与者自我报告了城市中的创伤类型。心理创伤造成的压力与抑郁程度、生活质量和康复能力的下降密切相关。有趣的是,创伤史的分类存在(是/否)与任何结果都没有显著关系。路径分析显示,康复对创伤困扰对抑郁和生活质量的影响具有中介作用,特别是与希望的康复子因素有关:研究结果表明,认知重塑侧重于对整体康复的积极评价,希望子因子可对创伤结果产生积极影响。该研究支持恢复在创伤后成长中的作用,并表明可以利用希望来帮助患者健康地处理创伤。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Recovery and trauma among urban African Americans with serious mental illness.","authors":"Patrick W Corrigan, Miranda Twiss, Katherine Nieweglowski, Lindsay Sheehan","doi":"10.1037/prj0000602","DOIUrl":"10.1037/prj0000602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic experiences are prevalent among people with serious mental illness and can significantly worsen outcomes. This study aimed to identify an urban cluster of trauma types, compare continuous distress ratings versus categorical experience of trauma for predicting outcomes such as depression and quality of life, and investigate the mediating role of recovery orientation in the impact of trauma exposure on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data came from an intervention study on African Americans with serious mental illness living in a large urban area; 212 participants completed baseline self-report measures of past trauma experiences, related distress levels, recovery, depression, and quality of life. Data were assessed using correlations and regressive path modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 56.6% of participants reported experiences with trauma. Analyses suggested an urban cluster of trauma types that was self-reported by over 25% of participants. Distress due to trauma strongly correlated with greater depression as well as reduced quality of life and recovery. Interestingly, the categorical presence of trauma history (yes/no) had no significant relationship with any outcomes. Path analyses revealed that recovery mediated the impact of trauma distress on depression and quality of life, specifically implicating the recovery subfactor of hope.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Results suggested that cognitive reframing focused on positive appraisals of overall recovery, and the hope subfactor can have a positive influence on trauma outcomes. The study supported the role of recovery in posttraumatic growth and suggests that hope can be used to help patients process trauma healthily. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"157-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139736458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-02-26DOI: 10.1037/prj0000603
Sang Qin, Patrick Corrigan, Eun-Jeong Lee
Objective: Compared to Western cultures, self-determination needs are expressed and pursued differently in Asian cultures, where interdependence and achieving greater good for the group are prioritized. To accommodate these needs, we propose the use of family-centered decision making (FCDM) to complement the shared decision-making (SDM) practice, fostering collaborative psychiatric care for Asian individuals residing in the United States.
Method: This article synthesizes various literature to outline the similarities and differences between SDM and FCDM, discuss implementation steps, challenges associated with implementation, potential solutions, and future research considerations.
Results: Our review suggests that FCDM is more responsive to and inclusive of Asian cultural experience, better reflecting these cultures' expression of self-determination. We propose a five-step framework for FCDM implementation in psychiatric rehabilitation for Asian and Asian American individuals, while identifying three further practical considerations: logistical difficulties, intrafamilial differences, and making the decision to use FCDM or not.
Conclusions and implications for practice: Given the heterogeneity of Asian individuals in the United States, we urge providers to allow flexibility in practicing FCDM. We outline the important components for providers to help individuals with psychiatric disabilities distinguish between the characteristics of FCDM and SDM, evaluate the potential pros and cons of utilizing FCDM, and then initiate FCDM if appropriate or requested by the individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Family-centered decision making: A culturally responsive collaborative approach among Asians living in the United States.","authors":"Sang Qin, Patrick Corrigan, Eun-Jeong Lee","doi":"10.1037/prj0000603","DOIUrl":"10.1037/prj0000603","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compared to Western cultures, self-determination needs are expressed and pursued differently in Asian cultures, where interdependence and achieving greater good for the group are prioritized. To accommodate these needs, we propose the use of family-centered decision making (FCDM) to complement the shared decision-making (SDM) practice, fostering collaborative psychiatric care for Asian individuals residing in the United States.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article synthesizes various literature to outline the similarities and differences between SDM and FCDM, discuss implementation steps, challenges associated with implementation, potential solutions, and future research considerations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review suggests that FCDM is more responsive to and inclusive of Asian cultural experience, better reflecting these cultures' expression of self-determination. We propose a five-step framework for FCDM implementation in psychiatric rehabilitation for Asian and Asian American individuals, while identifying three further practical considerations: logistical difficulties, intrafamilial differences, and making the decision to use FCDM or not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Given the heterogeneity of Asian individuals in the United States, we urge providers to allow flexibility in practicing FCDM. We outline the important components for providers to help individuals with psychiatric disabilities distinguish between the characteristics of FCDM and SDM, evaluate the potential pros and cons of utilizing FCDM, and then initiate FCDM if appropriate or requested by the individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"94-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139974035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-11-16DOI: 10.1037/prj0000592
Samuel Law, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Juveria Zaheer, Arash Nakhost
Objective: In Canada and elsewhere, making treatment decisions for a person with serious mental illness (SMI) who was found incapable for treatment decisions via a substitute decision maker (SDM) is the norm. This practice is often called into question from a rights-based perspective. The literature on the views of affected individuals is limited. We explore the experiences of adults with SMI who have had SDMs to gain more in-depth understanding.
Method: We conducted semistructured interviews with 11 consumers of psychiatric services who have had experiences with SDM (range 1-12 years) at an urban hospital in Toronto, Canada.
Results: Thematic analysis showed five main themes and related subthemes, including: (1) strong dissatisfaction with and rejection of the SDM's role and purpose; (2) pervasive sense of stigma associated with having a SDM; (3) ongoing struggles to gain autonomy; (4) mixed changes in relationship with and views about SDM; and (5) views on how to improve SDM process.
Conclusion and implications for practice: Our study highlights substantial dissatisfaction with the current SDM system and approaches among adults with SMI who have had SDMs. Issues of stigma and struggles to regain autonomy are prevalent. We discuss the personal, clinical, and social-legal contexts in which they occur, particularly in light of the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities that calls for replacing SDMs with supported decision making. Rights-based approaches to care carry substantial practice implications and call for thoughtful change management. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"\"It feels terrible that people are making decisions for me\": Reflections and experiences of individuals with psychiatric disability who have substitute decision makers for treatment.","authors":"Samuel Law, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Juveria Zaheer, Arash Nakhost","doi":"10.1037/prj0000592","DOIUrl":"10.1037/prj0000592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In Canada and elsewhere, making treatment decisions for a person with serious mental illness (SMI) who was found incapable for treatment decisions via a substitute decision maker (SDM) is the norm. This practice is often called into question from a rights-based perspective. The literature on the views of affected individuals is limited. We explore the experiences of adults with SMI who have had SDMs to gain more in-depth understanding.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews with 11 consumers of psychiatric services who have had experiences with SDM (range 1-12 years) at an urban hospital in Toronto, Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis showed five main themes and related subthemes, including: (1) strong dissatisfaction with and rejection of the SDM's role and purpose; (2) pervasive sense of stigma associated with having a SDM; (3) ongoing struggles to gain autonomy; (4) mixed changes in relationship with and views about SDM; and (5) views on how to improve SDM process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications for practice: </strong>Our study highlights substantial dissatisfaction with the current SDM system and approaches among adults with SMI who have had SDMs. Issues of stigma and struggles to regain autonomy are prevalent. We discuss the personal, clinical, and social-legal contexts in which they occur, particularly in light of the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities that calls for replacing SDMs with supported decision making. Rights-based approaches to care carry substantial practice implications and call for thoughtful change management. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"117-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136399802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lieke Zomer, Yolande Voskes, Jaap van Weeghel, Guy Widdershoven, Jos Twisk, Lisette van der Meer
Objective: The active recovery triad (ART) model provides guidelines for recovery-oriented care in long-term mental health care. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether compliance to the principles of the ART model is related to recovery-oriented care, service user recovery and satisfaction.
Method: A prospective study was conducted including two measurements, in which we investigated compliance to the principles of the ART model (ART fidelity), recovery-oriented care as measured by the Recovery-Oriented Practices Index-Revised (ROPI-R) at team level (n = 18) and outcome measures on service user level (n = 101) related to personal recovery, social roles, level of functioning, clinical recovery, transition, and satisfaction. We used multilevel modeling to evaluate these relationships.
Results: There was a significant association between active recovery triad (ART) fidelity and the ROPI-R. We did not find a significant association between overall ART fidelity and service user outcomes. Yet, we did find that higher ART fidelity in the domains "cooperation in the triad," "professionalization of staff," and "team structure" were related to improved clinical recovery, functioning, social roles, and performance of activities. However, higher ART fidelity in the domain "healing environment" was related to poorer functioning, and a higher score in the domain "safety and prevention of coercion" was related to poorer social roles and performance of activities.
Conclusions and implications for practice: We can conclude that compliance to the principles of the ART model is related to recovery-oriented care, measured with the ROPI-R. In addition, the findings suggest that in particular elements in the ART model are related to meaningful recovery outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:积极康复三要素(ART)模式为长期精神健康护理中以康复为导向的护理提供了指导。本研究旨在评估遵守 ART 模式的原则是否与以康复为导向的护理、服务使用者的康复和满意度有关:方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,包括两项测量,其中我们调查了对 ART 模式原则的遵循情况(ART 忠实度)、团队层面以恢复为导向的实践指数-修订版(ROPI-R)衡量的以恢复为导向的护理(n = 18),以及服务使用者层面与个人恢复、社会角色、功能水平、临床恢复、过渡和满意度相关的结果测量(n = 101)。我们使用多层次模型来评估这些关系:结果:积极康复三要素(ART)忠实度与 ROPI-R 之间存在明显关联。我们没有发现总体 ART 忠实度与服务用户结果之间存在明显关联。然而,我们确实发现,在 "三方合作"、"员工专业化 "和 "团队结构 "等领域,较高的 ART 忠实度与临床康复、功能、社会角色和活动表现的改善有关。然而,ART 在 "康复环境 "领域的忠实度越高,功能越差;在 "安全和防止胁迫 "领域的得分越高,社会角色和活动表现越差:我们可以得出结论,遵守 ART 模式的原则与以康复为导向的护理有关(用 ROPI-R 测量)。此外,研究结果表明,ART 模式中的特定要素与有意义的康复结果有关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Recovery-oriented care in long-term mental health settings: Relationship between the active recovery triad (ART) model, recovery-oriented care, and recovery of service users.","authors":"Lieke Zomer, Yolande Voskes, Jaap van Weeghel, Guy Widdershoven, Jos Twisk, Lisette van der Meer","doi":"10.1037/prj0000622","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000622","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The active recovery triad (ART) model provides guidelines for recovery-oriented care in long-term mental health care. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether compliance to the principles of the ART model is related to recovery-oriented care, service user recovery and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective study was conducted including two measurements, in which we investigated compliance to the principles of the ART model (ART fidelity), recovery-oriented care as measured by the Recovery-Oriented Practices Index-Revised (ROPI-R) at team level (n = 18) and outcome measures on service user level (n = 101) related to personal recovery, social roles, level of functioning, clinical recovery, transition, and satisfaction. We used multilevel modeling to evaluate these relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant association between active recovery triad (ART) fidelity and the ROPI-R. We did not find a significant association between overall ART fidelity and service user outcomes. Yet, we did find that higher ART fidelity in the domains \"cooperation in the triad,\" \"professionalization of staff,\" and \"team structure\" were related to improved clinical recovery, functioning, social roles, and performance of activities. However, higher ART fidelity in the domain \"healing environment\" was related to poorer functioning, and a higher score in the domain \"safety and prevention of coercion\" was related to poorer social roles and performance of activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>We can conclude that compliance to the principles of the ART model is related to recovery-oriented care, measured with the ROPI-R. In addition, the findings suggest that in particular elements in the ART model are related to meaningful recovery outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":"47 2","pages":"129-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This special section is dedicated to collaborative approaches in psychiatric rehabilitation, which are rooted in foundational values such as service user involvement and self-determination.
Methods: Five articles featuring collaborative approaches are included and briefly reviewed here.
Results: These articles highlight innovations in collaborative approaches, addressing existing limitations in research and practice and advancing understanding of collaborative psychiatric care among diverse populations.
Conclusions and implications for practice: They underscore the ongoing need for research and policy reform to promote more routine and widespread implementation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目标:本专栏专门讨论精神康复中的合作方法,这些方法植根于服务使用者参与和自我决定等基本价值观:方法:本文收录了五篇以协作方法为特色的文章,并对其进行了简要评述:结果:这些文章强调了合作方式的创新,解决了研究和实践中的现有局限性,增进了不同人群对合作式精神病护理的理解:结论和对实践的启示:这些文章强调了研究和政策改革的持续必要性,以促进更常规、更广泛的实施。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Collaborative approaches in psychiatric rehabilitation: Innovations in practice.","authors":"Elizabeth C Thomas","doi":"10.1037/prj0000624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This special section is dedicated to collaborative approaches in psychiatric rehabilitation, which are rooted in foundational values such as service user involvement and self-determination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five articles featuring collaborative approaches are included and briefly reviewed here.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These articles highlight innovations in collaborative approaches, addressing existing limitations in research and practice and advancing understanding of collaborative psychiatric care among diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>They underscore the ongoing need for research and policy reform to promote more routine and widespread implementation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":"47 2","pages":"91-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-12-14DOI: 10.1037/prj0000596
Deyu Pan, Zachary A Babb, Wilson J Brown, Sang Qin, Jennifer Sánchez
Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the English version of the Self-Stigma Scale-Short (SSS-S), a nine-item self-report self-stigma measurement, among U.S. adults with psychiatric disabilities.
Method: We obtained reliability and validity evidence from a sample of 275 adults with psychiatric disabilities.
Results: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 139) yielded a two-factor solution that accounts for 64.97% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 136) was conducted to compare alternative solutions, including a single-factor model, a two-correlated-factor model, a three-correlated-factor model, and a bifactorial model. The CFA results supported the bifactor S·I - 1 model as a superior latent factor structure for the SSS-S. The coefficient ω of the SSS-S was .94, indicating excellent internal reliability. Concurrent validity of the SSS-S was supported by significant positive correlations with societal stigma and psychiatric symptom severity, and negative correlations with psychiatric disability acceptance, general self-efficacy, and hope.
Conclusions and implications for practice: The overall findings concluded that the English version of the SSS-S demonstrated reliable and valid scores and a primarily unidimensional structure of self-stigma among U.S. adults with psychiatric disabilities. Given the adverse impact of self-stigma and its relationships with recovery-related constructs shown in this study, the routine use of the SSS-S is recommended in psychiatric rehabilitation settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Unidimensional versus multidimensional: A bifactor factor structure of the Self-Stigma Scale-Short (SSS-S) among U.S. adults with psychiatric disabilities.","authors":"Deyu Pan, Zachary A Babb, Wilson J Brown, Sang Qin, Jennifer Sánchez","doi":"10.1037/prj0000596","DOIUrl":"10.1037/prj0000596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the English version of the Self-Stigma Scale-Short (SSS-S), a nine-item self-report self-stigma measurement, among U.S. adults with psychiatric disabilities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We obtained reliability and validity evidence from a sample of 275 adults with psychiatric disabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis (EFA; <i>n</i> = 139) yielded a two-factor solution that accounts for 64.97% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; <i>n</i> = 136) was conducted to compare alternative solutions, including a single-factor model, a two-correlated-factor model, a three-correlated-factor model, and a bifactorial model. The CFA results supported the bifactor S·I - 1 model as a superior latent factor structure for the SSS-S. The coefficient ω of the SSS-S was .94, indicating excellent internal reliability. Concurrent validity of the SSS-S was supported by significant positive correlations with societal stigma and psychiatric symptom severity, and negative correlations with psychiatric disability acceptance, general self-efficacy, and hope.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>The overall findings concluded that the English version of the SSS-S demonstrated reliable and valid scores and a primarily unidimensional structure of self-stigma among U.S. adults with psychiatric disabilities. Given the adverse impact of self-stigma and its relationships with recovery-related constructs shown in this study, the routine use of the SSS-S is recommended in psychiatric rehabilitation settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"167-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138811656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}