首页 > 最新文献

Behavioral Sciences & the Law最新文献

英文 中文
A Status Update on U.S. Adult Mental Health Courts. 美国成人心理健康法庭现状更新
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70035
Laura N Honegger, Stacy Dewald, Althia Gayle, Badriah Alharbi

Mental health courts (MHCs) are a growing component of the U.S. criminal justice system's response to individuals with mental illness. Yet, key aspects of contemporary MHC practices, such as eligibility criteria, assessment of risk-need-responsivity principles, integration of trauma-informed care, use of sanctions and incentives, and access to community resources, remain understudied. In response, we conducted a survey study of 70 U.S. adult MHCs to explore these domains. Our findings indicate broadened eligibility criteria, with increases in acceptance of violent offenses and greater inclusion of non-traditional primary diagnoses (e.g., developmental disabilities and traumatic brain injuries). Fewer than a quarter of respondents reported bilingual MHC staff and translated program materials. Most MHCs employed at least one risk assessment tool. Just over 90% of MHCs included jail sanctions on their menu of options, with the majority incarcerating participants for 6 days or less on average. Tailored sanctions and incentives were perceived as being most effective, but expansion of available incentives is hindered by lack of funding. MHCs identified housing, inpatient psychiatric units, and co-occurring disorders resources as the most needed resources for participants. Our findings highlight the differences across MHCs that persist across jurisdictions.

精神健康法庭(mhc)是美国刑事司法系统对精神疾病患者的回应中一个日益增长的组成部分。然而,当代MHC实践的关键方面,如资格标准、风险-需求-反应原则的评估、创伤知情护理的整合、制裁和激励措施的使用以及获得社区资源等,仍未得到充分研究。为此,我们对70个美国成人mhc进行了一项调查研究,以探索这些领域。我们的研究结果表明,随着对暴力犯罪的接受程度的提高,以及非传统初级诊断(如发育障碍和创伤性脑损伤)的纳入程度的提高,资格标准得到了扩大。不到四分之一的受访者报告说MHC工作人员和翻译的项目材料是双语的。大多数mhc至少使用一种风险评估工具。超过90%的mhc在他们的菜单上包括了监禁处罚,大多数参与者平均监禁6天或更少。量身定制的制裁和奖励措施被认为是最有效的,但现有奖励措施的扩大因缺乏资金而受到阻碍。MHCs确定住房、住院精神科和并发疾病资源是参与者最需要的资源。我们的研究结果强调了不同司法管辖区间mhc的差异。
{"title":"A Status Update on U.S. Adult Mental Health Courts.","authors":"Laura N Honegger, Stacy Dewald, Althia Gayle, Badriah Alharbi","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental health courts (MHCs) are a growing component of the U.S. criminal justice system's response to individuals with mental illness. Yet, key aspects of contemporary MHC practices, such as eligibility criteria, assessment of risk-need-responsivity principles, integration of trauma-informed care, use of sanctions and incentives, and access to community resources, remain understudied. In response, we conducted a survey study of 70 U.S. adult MHCs to explore these domains. Our findings indicate broadened eligibility criteria, with increases in acceptance of violent offenses and greater inclusion of non-traditional primary diagnoses (e.g., developmental disabilities and traumatic brain injuries). Fewer than a quarter of respondents reported bilingual MHC staff and translated program materials. Most MHCs employed at least one risk assessment tool. Just over 90% of MHCs included jail sanctions on their menu of options, with the majority incarcerating participants for 6 days or less on average. Tailored sanctions and incentives were perceived as being most effective, but expansion of available incentives is hindered by lack of funding. MHCs identified housing, inpatient psychiatric units, and co-occurring disorders resources as the most needed resources for participants. Our findings highlight the differences across MHCs that persist across jurisdictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Bankruptcy Attorneys' Experiences With Clients Exhibiting Suicidality: Challenges and Recommendations for Suicide Prevention. 探讨破产律师与客户表现出自杀倾向的经验:自杀预防的挑战和建议。
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70033
John R Blosnich, Jeanne M Ward, Melissa Perkins, Marissa Ding, Susan De Luca

Bankruptcy and financial distress commonly precipitate suicidal crises, putting bankruptcy attorneys in potentially difficult situations with clients. This qualitative study explored attorneys' experiences with clients' risk for suicide and attorneys' recommendations for suicide prevention. Bankruptcy attorneys and trustees (n = 11) were recruited via outreach to attorney groups (e.g., National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys). Semi-structured interviews explored clients' distress, responses to clients' suicidal disclosures, and previous suicide prevention training. The research team established a codebook from transcribed interviews within Dedoose software, using peer debriefing and consensus building to iteratively identify themes. Nearly all attorneys had experiences with clients discussing suicide, but most did not know how to intervene. Common themes included clients' co-occurring stressors (e.g., divorce, unemployment), destigmatizing the bankruptcy process, and navigating attorney-client privilege. Major themes for prevention were correcting misconceptions about and destigmatizing bankruptcy and suicide prevention training that is sensitive to the context of the legal profession.

破产和财务困境通常会引发自杀危机,使破产律师与客户之间的关系陷入潜在的困境。本质性研究探讨律师面对客户自杀风险的经验,以及律师预防自杀的建议。破产律师和受托人(n = 11)是通过与律师团体(例如,全国消费者破产律师协会)的联系而招募的。半结构化访谈探讨了客户的痛苦,对客户自杀披露的反应,以及以前的自杀预防培训。研究团队从Dedoose软件中的转录访谈中建立了一个代码本,使用同行汇报和共识构建来迭代地确定主题。几乎所有的律师都有与客户讨论自杀的经历,但大多数不知道如何干预。常见的主题包括客户共同出现的压力源(如离婚、失业)、使破产程序去污名化,以及如何利用律师-客户特权。预防的主要主题是纠正对破产和预防自杀培训的误解,并使其去污名化,这种培训对法律专业的情况很敏感。
{"title":"Exploring Bankruptcy Attorneys' Experiences With Clients Exhibiting Suicidality: Challenges and Recommendations for Suicide Prevention.","authors":"John R Blosnich, Jeanne M Ward, Melissa Perkins, Marissa Ding, Susan De Luca","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bankruptcy and financial distress commonly precipitate suicidal crises, putting bankruptcy attorneys in potentially difficult situations with clients. This qualitative study explored attorneys' experiences with clients' risk for suicide and attorneys' recommendations for suicide prevention. Bankruptcy attorneys and trustees (n = 11) were recruited via outreach to attorney groups (e.g., National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys). Semi-structured interviews explored clients' distress, responses to clients' suicidal disclosures, and previous suicide prevention training. The research team established a codebook from transcribed interviews within Dedoose software, using peer debriefing and consensus building to iteratively identify themes. Nearly all attorneys had experiences with clients discussing suicide, but most did not know how to intervene. Common themes included clients' co-occurring stressors (e.g., divorce, unemployment), destigmatizing the bankruptcy process, and navigating attorney-client privilege. Major themes for prevention were correcting misconceptions about and destigmatizing bankruptcy and suicide prevention training that is sensitive to the context of the legal profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex Trafficking Myth Reduction: Evaluating an Educational Approach to Reducing Victim Blaming and Increasing Victim Empathy. 减少性交易神话:评估减少受害者指责和增加受害者同情的教育方法。
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-12-20 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70034
Dara Mojtahedi, Gemma Hewitt, Sophie Fitton

This study examined the effectiveness of a brief educational intervention designed to reduce sex trafficking (ST) myth acceptance. Using a 2 × 2 mixed design, participants (N = 189) viewed either an educational video addressing common ST myths or a control video on human memory. Measures of ST myth acceptance and victim empathy were collected before, immediately after, and 1 month following the intervention. Participants also evaluated a vignette describing an alleged ST case and responded to items assessing empathy, victim blaming, and perceptions of the defendant's guilt. The intervention did not significantly reduce ST myth acceptance or influence vignette-based judgements, which may reflect a ceiling effect given participants' already supportive baseline attitudes. However, a protective effect emerged over time: participants in the intervention condition maintained supportive victim attitudes at follow-up, whereas control participants demonstrated increased victim blaming and decreased empathy.

本研究考察了旨在降低性交易神话接受度的简短教育干预的有效性。采用2 × 2混合设计,参与者(N = 189)观看了讲述常见ST神话的教育视频或关于人类记忆的对照视频。在干预前、干预后和干预后1个月分别收集ST神话接受度和受害者同理心的测量数据。参与者还评估了一个描述所谓ST案例的小插图,并对评估同理心、受害者指责和被告内疚的看法的项目做出了反应。干预并没有显著降低ST神话的接受度或影响基于图像的判断,这可能反映了一个天花板效应,因为参与者已经支持基线态度。然而,随着时间的推移,保护效应出现了:干预条件下的参与者在随访中保持了支持受害者的态度,而对照组参与者则表现出更多的受害者责备和减少的同理心。
{"title":"Sex Trafficking Myth Reduction: Evaluating an Educational Approach to Reducing Victim Blaming and Increasing Victim Empathy.","authors":"Dara Mojtahedi, Gemma Hewitt, Sophie Fitton","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the effectiveness of a brief educational intervention designed to reduce sex trafficking (ST) myth acceptance. Using a 2 × 2 mixed design, participants (N = 189) viewed either an educational video addressing common ST myths or a control video on human memory. Measures of ST myth acceptance and victim empathy were collected before, immediately after, and 1 month following the intervention. Participants also evaluated a vignette describing an alleged ST case and responded to items assessing empathy, victim blaming, and perceptions of the defendant's guilt. The intervention did not significantly reduce ST myth acceptance or influence vignette-based judgements, which may reflect a ceiling effect given participants' already supportive baseline attitudes. However, a protective effect emerged over time: participants in the intervention condition maintained supportive victim attitudes at follow-up, whereas control participants demonstrated increased victim blaming and decreased empathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Are Risk Assessment Tools More Accurate Than Unstructured Judgments in Predicting Violent, Any, and Sexual Offending? A Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparison Studies.” 对“在预测暴力、暴力和性犯罪方面,风险评估工具比非结构化判断更准确吗?”直接比较研究的荟萃分析。
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-12-13 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70026
<p>Viljoen, J. L., Goossens, I., Monjazeb, S., Cochrane, D. M., Vargen, L. M., Jonnson, M. R., Blanchard, A. J. E., Li, S. M. Y., & Jackson, J. R. (2025). Are risk assessment tools more accurate than unstructured judgments in predicting violent, any, and sexual offending? A meta-analysis of direct comparison studies. <i>Behavioral Sciences and the Law</i>, 43, 75–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2698.</p><p>The above reference article was published with numerous instances of “redacted for blind review” or “author names redacted” throughout, though during the submission process complete, unblinded versions of the manuscript were provided. Below, we have outlined each instance of missing information in the published article and have provided the information to be added (in <b>bold</b>).</p><p>P. 78, Paragraph 3.</p><p>“According to <b>our recent umbrella review</b>, only one published meta-analysis has, in fact, compared the accuracy of unstructured judgment to risk assessment tools in the prediction of recidivism (<b>Viljoen et al., 2021</b>).”</p><p>P. 78, Paragraph 4.</p><p>“This lack of control is problematic because, based on <b>our recent umbrella review</b>, 89% of studies included in prior reviews on unstructured risk judgments showed a high risk of bias or problems with statistical conclusion validity (e.g., a failure to use appropriate statistical tests to compare unstructured approaches and tools; <b>Viljoen et al., 2021</b>).”</p><p>P. 80, Section 2.1, Paragraph 1.</p><p>“…(Preregistration Number = <b>CRD42020187585</b>; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42020187585).”</p><p>P. 81, Section 2.3, Paragraph 2.</p><p>“…(b) reviewed the systematic reviews and primary studies identified in <b>Viljoen et al. (2021)…”</b></p><p>P. 81, Section 2.4, paragraph 1.</p><p>“Two raters (<b>J.R.J., S.M.Y.L.</b>) independently screened the abstracts and titles of each study to determine if it was relevant.”</p><p>P.82, Section 2.5, Paragraph 1.</p><p>“After a study was screened in (<i>n</i> = 59), two raters (<b>J.L.V., M.R.J.</b>) conducted a full-text review by reading the study in its entirety to determine if it met inclusion criteria.”</p><p>P.83, Section 2.6, Paragraph 1.</p><p>“Next, data from the included studies was extracted by four Ph.D. students (<b>D.C., I.G., L.M.V., S.M.</b>). All raters had previously completed data extraction for a meta-review which included a similar data extraction form and the same risk of bias tool as the present meta-analysis (<b>Viljoen et al., 2021).”</b></p><p>P.83, Subsection 2.7.1, Paragraph 1.</p><p>“A data extraction form was developed by using guidelines (e.g., Moons et al., 2014) and protocols from prior research (Viljoen et al., 2021).”</p><p>P. 85, Section 2.10, Paragraph 1.</p><p>“Analyses were prespecified and included in our preregistration plan. The dataset (e.g., effect sizes for individual studies, syntax, and results) are available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SKB3J. To help ensu
Viljoen, J. L., Goossens, I., Monjazeb, S., Cochrane, D. M., Vargen, L. M., Jonnson, M. R., Blanchard, A. J. E., Li, S. M. Y., & Jackson, J. R.(2025)。在预测暴力、暴力和性侵犯方面,风险评估工具是否比非结构化判断更准确?直接比较研究的荟萃分析。行为科学与法律,43,75-113。虽然在提交过程中提供了完整的、非盲法版本的手稿,但https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2698.The上面的参考文章在发表过程中有许多“为盲审而编辑”或“作者姓名被编辑”的例子。下面,我们列出了已发表文章中缺失信息的每个实例,并提供了要添加的信息(粗体)。78、第3段“根据我们最近的综述,事实上,只有一项已发表的荟萃分析比较了非结构化判断与风险评估工具在预测再犯方面的准确性(Viljoen et al., 2021)。”78、第4段“这种缺乏控制是有问题的,因为根据我们最近的总体审查,89%的研究包括在之前的审查中,对非结构化风险判断显示出很高的偏见风险或统计结论有效性问题(例如,未能使用适当的统计测试来比较非结构化方法和工具;Viljoen等人,2021)。”80,第2.1节,第1段“…(预注册号= CRD42020187585; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42020187585)。”第2.3节第2段。“……(b)审查了Viljoen等人(2021)中确定的系统评价和初步研究……”P。第2.4节第1段。两位评判员(j.r.j., S.M.Y.L.)独立筛选每项研究的摘要和标题,以确定其是否相关。82,第2.5条,第1段在对一项研究(n = 59)进行筛选后,两名评判员(j.l.v., M.R.J.)通过完整阅读研究来进行全文审查,以确定它是否符合纳入标准。83,第2.6节第1段。接下来,四位博士生(d.c., i.g., l.m.v., S.M.)从纳入的研究中提取数据。所有评分者之前都完成了元评价的数据提取,其中包括与本荟萃分析类似的数据提取表格和相同的偏倚风险工具(Viljoen et al., 2021)。83,第2.7.1小节,第1段“通过使用指南(例如,Moons等人,2014年)和先前研究的协议(Viljoen等人,2021年)开发了数据提取表。”第2.10条,第1段。“分析是预先指定的,并包含在我们的预注册计划中。数据集(例如,个别研究的效应大小,语法和结果)可在https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SKB3J上获得。为了确保我们分析的准确性,三位作者(i.g., j.l.v., M.R.J.)独立创建了语法文件,然后识别并解决了他们结果中的任何差异。分析还由一位独立的统计顾问(ms)进行审查和检查,该顾问在元分析、多层次建模和R(我们使用的统计软件包)方面具有专业知识。100,第5段。在我们之前的荟萃分析中,几乎所有的研究(89.1%)都被评为高风险偏倚(Viljoen et al., 2021)。105年,致谢。“这项研究的数据和语法可以在https://osf.io/skb3j/overview或https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SKB3J上公开获取。”
{"title":"Correction to “Are Risk Assessment Tools More Accurate Than Unstructured Judgments in Predicting Violent, Any, and Sexual Offending? A Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparison Studies.”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70026","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70026","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Viljoen, J. L., Goossens, I., Monjazeb, S., Cochrane, D. M., Vargen, L. M., Jonnson, M. R., Blanchard, A. J. E., Li, S. M. Y., &amp; Jackson, J. R. (2025). Are risk assessment tools more accurate than unstructured judgments in predicting violent, any, and sexual offending? A meta-analysis of direct comparison studies. &lt;i&gt;Behavioral Sciences and the Law&lt;/i&gt;, 43, 75–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2698.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The above reference article was published with numerous instances of “redacted for blind review” or “author names redacted” throughout, though during the submission process complete, unblinded versions of the manuscript were provided. Below, we have outlined each instance of missing information in the published article and have provided the information to be added (in &lt;b&gt;bold&lt;/b&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P. 78, Paragraph 3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“According to &lt;b&gt;our recent umbrella review&lt;/b&gt;, only one published meta-analysis has, in fact, compared the accuracy of unstructured judgment to risk assessment tools in the prediction of recidivism (&lt;b&gt;Viljoen et al., 2021&lt;/b&gt;).”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P. 78, Paragraph 4.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“This lack of control is problematic because, based on &lt;b&gt;our recent umbrella review&lt;/b&gt;, 89% of studies included in prior reviews on unstructured risk judgments showed a high risk of bias or problems with statistical conclusion validity (e.g., a failure to use appropriate statistical tests to compare unstructured approaches and tools; &lt;b&gt;Viljoen et al., 2021&lt;/b&gt;).”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P. 80, Section 2.1, Paragraph 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“…(Preregistration Number = &lt;b&gt;CRD42020187585&lt;/b&gt;; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42020187585).”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P. 81, Section 2.3, Paragraph 2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“…(b) reviewed the systematic reviews and primary studies identified in &lt;b&gt;Viljoen et al. (2021)…”&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P. 81, Section 2.4, paragraph 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“Two raters (&lt;b&gt;J.R.J., S.M.Y.L.&lt;/b&gt;) independently screened the abstracts and titles of each study to determine if it was relevant.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.82, Section 2.5, Paragraph 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“After a study was screened in (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 59), two raters (&lt;b&gt;J.L.V., M.R.J.&lt;/b&gt;) conducted a full-text review by reading the study in its entirety to determine if it met inclusion criteria.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.83, Section 2.6, Paragraph 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“Next, data from the included studies was extracted by four Ph.D. students (&lt;b&gt;D.C., I.G., L.M.V., S.M.&lt;/b&gt;). All raters had previously completed data extraction for a meta-review which included a similar data extraction form and the same risk of bias tool as the present meta-analysis (&lt;b&gt;Viljoen et al., 2021).”&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.83, Subsection 2.7.1, Paragraph 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“A data extraction form was developed by using guidelines (e.g., Moons et al., 2014) and protocols from prior research (Viljoen et al., 2021).”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P. 85, Section 2.10, Paragraph 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“Analyses were prespecified and included in our preregistration plan. The dataset (e.g., effect sizes for individual studies, syntax, and results) are available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SKB3J. To help ensu","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"164-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12884873/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stranger Rape or Impromptu Consensual Sex? Investigating Mock Juror Decision-Making in a Genuine Contested Rape Trial. 陌生人强奸还是即兴性行为?在一起真正有争议的强奸案审判中调查模拟陪审员的决策。
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70032
Dominic Willmott, Rosie Woodhams

The aim of this study was to better understand juror decision-making in a less typical rape trial scenario where even prior acquaintance is disputed. Adopting an improved mock trial paradigm including a video-recorded recreation of a genuine rape allegation and jury-group deliberation, 156 jury-eligible participants took part in 1 of 13 identical 12-person mock trials. Pre-trial, a psychosocial questionnaire was conducted and post-trial, juries deliberated attempting to reach a unanimous verdict. Regression analyses revealed that male jurors, those with greater belief in rape myths and lower scores in interpersonal manipulation were most likely to return not guilty verdicts pre-deliberation. Post-deliberation, increased self-esteem and rape myth acceptance scores were associated with not guilty verdict selections. Female and Caucasian jurors were most likely to change their decision following group-deliberation. This research has important implications for understanding the role that juror biases can have on rape trial outcomes with jury reform initiatives discussed.

这项研究的目的是为了更好地理解陪审员在一个不太典型的强奸审判场景中的决策,在这个场景中,甚至以前的相识都是有争议的。采用改进的模拟审判模式,包括录像再现真实的强奸指控和陪审团小组审议,156名符合陪审团资格的参与者参加了13次相同的12人模拟审判中的1次。审判前进行了心理社会问卷调查,审判后,陪审团进行了审议,试图达成一致的裁决。回归分析显示,男性陪审员,那些更相信强奸神话和人际关系操纵得分较低的人,最有可能在审议前做出无罪判决。深思熟虑后,自尊的增强和强奸神话的接受分数与无罪判决的选择有关。女性和白人陪审员最有可能在集体审议后改变他们的决定。这项研究对理解陪审员偏见对强奸审判结果的影响具有重要意义,并讨论了陪审团改革举措。
{"title":"Stranger Rape or Impromptu Consensual Sex? Investigating Mock Juror Decision-Making in a Genuine Contested Rape Trial.","authors":"Dominic Willmott, Rosie Woodhams","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to better understand juror decision-making in a less typical rape trial scenario where even prior acquaintance is disputed. Adopting an improved mock trial paradigm including a video-recorded recreation of a genuine rape allegation and jury-group deliberation, 156 jury-eligible participants took part in 1 of 13 identical 12-person mock trials. Pre-trial, a psychosocial questionnaire was conducted and post-trial, juries deliberated attempting to reach a unanimous verdict. Regression analyses revealed that male jurors, those with greater belief in rape myths and lower scores in interpersonal manipulation were most likely to return not guilty verdicts pre-deliberation. Post-deliberation, increased self-esteem and rape myth acceptance scores were associated with not guilty verdict selections. Female and Caucasian jurors were most likely to change their decision following group-deliberation. This research has important implications for understanding the role that juror biases can have on rape trial outcomes with jury reform initiatives discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145726623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Large Language Model (LLM) and Human Performance in Child Investigative Interviewing Question Formulation Tasks 大语言模型(LLM)与儿童调查性访谈问题制定任务中的人的表现。
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70029
Liisa Järvilehto, Yongjie Sun, Nami Aiba, Shumpei Haginoya, Hasse Hallström, Julia Korkman, Pekka Santtila

We compared the performance of large language models (LLMs) and humans with various levels of expertise in child investigative interviewing on tasks related to question formulation. Two tasks were employed: a static Interview Excerpt Task where participants (60 psychologists, 60 naive participants, GPT-4, and Llama-2) formulated follow-up questions to 100 interview excerpts, and a dynamic Avatar Interviewing Task where participants (32 professionals, 32 students, and GPT-4) conducted 10-min interviews with AI-driven child avatars. In the dynamic task, LLMs used fewer recommended questions (M = 8.69 vs. 18.75) and more non-recommended questions (M = 17.69 vs. 6.81) than professionals. Conversely, in the static task, GPT-4 outperformed psychologists, using more invitations (67.8% vs. 5.4%) and fewer option-posing questions (3.7% vs. 31.4%). While LLMs demonstrated strong question formulation skills in controlled environments, they struggled with adaptive dialogs.

我们比较了大型语言模型(llm)和在儿童调查访谈中具有不同专业知识水平的人在问题制定相关任务上的表现。采用了两个任务:静态访谈摘录任务,参与者(60名心理学家,60名天真的参与者,GPT-4和Llama-2)制定了100个访谈摘录的后续问题;动态化身访谈任务,参与者(32名专业人士,32名学生和GPT-4)与人工智能驱动的儿童化身进行了10分钟的访谈。在动态任务中,法学硕士比专业人员使用更少的推荐问题(M = 8.69 vs. 18.75)和更多的非推荐问题(M = 17.69 vs. 6.81)。相反,在静态任务中,GPT-4的表现优于心理学家,他们使用了更多的邀请(67.8%对5.4%)和更少的选项问题(3.7%对31.4%)。虽然法学硕士在受控环境中表现出了很强的问题制定技能,但他们在适应性对话方面却遇到了困难。
{"title":"Large Language Model (LLM) and Human Performance in Child Investigative Interviewing Question Formulation Tasks","authors":"Liisa Järvilehto,&nbsp;Yongjie Sun,&nbsp;Nami Aiba,&nbsp;Shumpei Haginoya,&nbsp;Hasse Hallström,&nbsp;Julia Korkman,&nbsp;Pekka Santtila","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We compared the performance of large language models (LLMs) and humans with various levels of expertise in child investigative interviewing on tasks related to question formulation. Two tasks were employed: a static Interview Excerpt Task where participants (60 psychologists, 60 naive participants, GPT-4, and Llama-2) formulated follow-up questions to 100 interview excerpts, and a dynamic Avatar Interviewing Task where participants (32 professionals, 32 students, and GPT-4) conducted 10-min interviews with AI-driven child avatars. In the dynamic task, LLMs used fewer recommended questions (<i>M</i> = 8.69 vs. 18.75) and more non-recommended questions (<i>M</i> = 17.69 vs. 6.81) than professionals. Conversely, in the static task, GPT-4 outperformed psychologists, using more invitations (67.8% vs. 5.4%) and fewer option-posing questions (3.7% vs. 31.4%). While LLMs demonstrated strong question formulation skills in controlled environments, they struggled with adaptive dialogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"142-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865673/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145709823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of Myth Education on Responses to Disclosures of Sexual Assault 神话教育对性侵事件披露反应的影响。
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-11-30 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70027
Amy Thompson, Blake M. McKimmie, Gianni Ribeiro, Campbell Mowle

Sexual assault victims most often disclose informally to friends or family, whose responses may be shaped by rape myths. While education has been used to improve attitudes towards sexual assault (e.g., among police), its impact on informal disclosure recipients remains underexplored. In Study 1, participants completed one of three educational modules: rape myths, myths with injunctive guidance to support victims, or a control. Although rape myth endorsement decreased, participants still evaluated a non-stereotypical assault scenario more negatively than a stereotypical one. Exploratory analyses suggested that consent and rape schemas are distinct and both influence evaluations of victims. Therefore, Study 2 explored whether targeting consent myths could improve evaluations of non-stereotypical victims. Participants received a module on rape myths, consent myths, both, or a control. Again, education reduced myth endorsement but did not impact victim evaluations. These findings highlight the complexity of improving responses to disclosures of sexual assault.

性侵犯受害者通常会非正式地向朋友或家人透露,他们的反应可能受到强奸神话的影响。虽然教育已被用于改善对性侵犯的态度(例如警察),但其对非正式披露接受者的影响仍未得到充分探讨。在研究1中,参与者完成了三个教育模块中的一个:强奸神话、带有支持受害者的禁令指导的神话或对照。尽管对强奸神话的认可有所下降,但参与者对非刻板印象的攻击场景的评价仍比刻板印象的场景更为负面。探索性分析表明,同意和强奸图式是不同的,两者都影响对受害者的评价。因此,研究2探讨了针对同意神话是否可以提高对非刻板印象受害者的评估。参与者接受了一个关于强奸神话、同意神话、两者兼而有之或对照的模块。再一次,教育减少了神话的认可,但没有影响受害者的评价。这些发现凸显了改善对性侵犯披露的反应的复杂性。
{"title":"The Effect of Myth Education on Responses to Disclosures of Sexual Assault","authors":"Amy Thompson,&nbsp;Blake M. McKimmie,&nbsp;Gianni Ribeiro,&nbsp;Campbell Mowle","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70027","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sexual assault victims most often disclose informally to friends or family, whose responses may be shaped by rape myths. While education has been used to improve attitudes towards sexual assault (e.g., among police), its impact on informal disclosure recipients remains underexplored. In Study 1, participants completed one of three educational modules: rape myths, myths with injunctive guidance to support victims, or a control. Although rape myth endorsement decreased, participants still evaluated a non-stereotypical assault scenario more negatively than a stereotypical one. Exploratory analyses suggested that consent and rape schemas are distinct and both influence evaluations of victims. Therefore, Study 2 explored whether targeting consent myths could improve evaluations of non-stereotypical victims. Participants received a module on rape myths, consent myths, both, or a control. Again, education reduced myth endorsement but did not impact victim evaluations. These findings highlight the complexity of improving responses to disclosures of sexual assault.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"131-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145649908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Irreversible Effects of Affiliation With Delinquent Peers on Cyberbullying Perpetration Among Adolescents in Hong Kong: Moderating Effect of Student–Teacher Relationships 香港青少年网络欺凌行为的不可逆影响:师生关系的调节作用
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-11-29 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70030
Yang Han, Ji-Kang Chen

Adolescent affiliation with delinquent peers can lead to offline delinquent behaviors; however, less is known about its effect on online delinquent behaviors, particularly cyberbullying perpetration. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the delinquent peer effect on cyberbullying perpetration can be reversed by reducing affiliation with delinquent peers. Using novel asymmetric fixed-effects regression with two-wave follow-up data from Hong Kong (N = 356) to control for observed time-variant and observed and unobserved time-invariant confounders, we found that increased affiliation with delinquent peers was associated with increased cyberbullying perpetration, whereas decreased affiliation with delinquent peers was not associated with cyberbullying perpetration. Additionally, improving student–teacher relationships mitigated the effect of increased affiliation with delinquent peers on cyberbullying perpetration. Therefore, the effect of affiliation with delinquent peers on cyberbullying perpetration may be irreversible. Nevertheless, interventions and policies can aim to enhance student–teacher relationships to alleviate the delinquent peer effect on cyberbullying perpetration.

青少年与不良同伴的关系会导致线下的不良行为;然而,人们对它对网络犯罪行为的影响知之甚少,尤其是对网络欺凌行为的影响。此外,还不清楚不良同伴对网络欺凌行为的影响是否可以通过减少与不良同伴的联系来逆转。采用新颖的非对称固定效应回归和来自香港的两波随访数据(N = 356)来控制观察到的时变、观察到的和未观察到的时不变混杂因素,我们发现与不良同伴的关系增加与网络欺凌行为的增加有关,而与不良同伴的关系减少与网络欺凌行为的增加无关。此外,师生关系的改善可以减轻与不良同伴关系增加对网络欺凌行为的影响。因此,与不良同伴的关系对网络欺凌行为的影响可能是不可逆的。然而,干预措施和政策可以旨在加强师生关系,以减轻不良同伴对网络欺凌行为的影响。
{"title":"Irreversible Effects of Affiliation With Delinquent Peers on Cyberbullying Perpetration Among Adolescents in Hong Kong: Moderating Effect of Student–Teacher Relationships","authors":"Yang Han,&nbsp;Ji-Kang Chen","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adolescent affiliation with delinquent peers can lead to offline delinquent behaviors; however, less is known about its effect on online delinquent behaviors, particularly cyberbullying perpetration. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the delinquent peer effect on cyberbullying perpetration can be reversed by reducing affiliation with delinquent peers. Using novel asymmetric fixed-effects regression with two-wave follow-up data from Hong Kong (<i>N</i> = 356) to control for observed time-variant and observed and unobserved time-invariant confounders, we found that increased affiliation with delinquent peers was associated with increased cyberbullying perpetration, whereas decreased affiliation with delinquent peers was not associated with cyberbullying perpetration. Additionally, improving student–teacher relationships mitigated the effect of increased affiliation with delinquent peers on cyberbullying perpetration. Therefore, the effect of affiliation with delinquent peers on cyberbullying perpetration may be irreversible. Nevertheless, interventions and policies can aim to enhance student–teacher relationships to alleviate the delinquent peer effect on cyberbullying perpetration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"120-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865677/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145640805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex Work and Sexual Victimization: A Comparative Study of Students’ and Police Officers’ Perceptions of Sex-Working Rape Victims 性工作与性受害:学生与警察对性工作强奸受害者认知的比较研究。
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-11-28 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70024
Liza Zvi, Mally Shechory Bitton

Attitudes toward sexual violence and victim-blaming are culturally dependent and should be examined within specific social and legal contexts. The present study sought to compare Israeli police officers' (N = 220) and students' (N = 230) perceptions toward sex working rape victims. Participants were presented with a vignette describing a rape, where the victim was either identified as a sex worker or not. They then provided ratings of blame and sentencing, along with assessments of victim resistance and harm and their emotional responses toward the victim. Significant differences emerged between the groups. Although overall victim-blaming was relatively low, police officers attributed more blame when the victim was identified as a sex worker, while students' blame attribution remained unaffected by the victim's status. Similarly, police officers were more lenient toward the perpetrator than students regarding punishment, particularly when the victim was identified as a sex worker. These differences also appeared in emotional responses and evaluations of victim resistance and harm, indicating that police officers held more stereotypical and skeptical attitudes compared to students. The findings suggest that law enforcement attitudes may reflect a unique institutional perspective, shaped by organizational norms within the police force, the broader legal discourse, and police officers' work-related exposure.

对性暴力和指责受害者的态度取决于文化,应在具体的社会和法律背景下加以审查。本研究试图比较以色列警察(N = 220)和学生(N = 230)对性工作者强奸受害者的看法。研究人员向参与者展示了一幅描述强奸的小插图,其中受害者要么被认定为性工作者,要么不是。然后,他们提供了对指责和量刑的评级,以及对受害者抵抗和伤害的评估,以及他们对受害者的情绪反应。两组之间出现了显著差异。尽管总体上指责受害者的比例相对较低,但当受害者被认定为性工作者时,警察会更多地指责受害者,而学生的指责不受受害者身份的影响。同样,在惩罚方面,警察对犯罪者比学生更宽容,特别是当受害者被认定为性工作者时。这些差异也出现在对受害者抵抗和伤害的情绪反应和评估中,表明警察比学生持有更多的刻板印象和怀疑态度。研究结果表明,执法态度可能反映了一种独特的制度视角,这种视角由警察部队内部的组织规范、更广泛的法律话语和警察与工作相关的接触所塑造。
{"title":"Sex Work and Sexual Victimization: A Comparative Study of Students’ and Police Officers’ Perceptions of Sex-Working Rape Victims","authors":"Liza Zvi,&nbsp;Mally Shechory Bitton","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70024","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attitudes toward sexual violence and victim-blaming are culturally dependent and should be examined within specific social and legal contexts. The present study sought to compare Israeli police officers' (<i>N</i> = 220) and students' (<i>N</i> = 230) perceptions toward sex working rape victims. Participants were presented with a vignette describing a rape, where the victim was either identified as a sex worker or not. They then provided ratings of blame and sentencing, along with assessments of victim resistance and harm and their emotional responses toward the victim. Significant differences emerged between the groups. Although overall victim-blaming was relatively low, police officers attributed more blame when the victim was identified as a sex worker, while students' blame attribution remained unaffected by the victim's status. Similarly, police officers were more lenient toward the perpetrator than students regarding punishment, particularly when the victim was identified as a sex worker. These differences also appeared in emotional responses and evaluations of victim resistance and harm, indicating that police officers held more stereotypical and skeptical attitudes compared to students. The findings suggest that law enforcement attitudes may reflect a unique institutional perspective, shaped by organizational norms within the police force, the broader legal discourse, and police officers' work-related exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"109-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865668/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145640924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The “Double Bind” of Gender-Based Violence: Secondary Victimization in Courtroom Cross-Examinations 性别暴力的“双重束缚”:法庭质证中的二次受害。
IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.70025
Selena Mariano

This paper examines how secondary victimization is interactionally produced during courtroom cross-examinations of women who have experienced sexual violence. Drawing on Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis, the study investigates how defense attorneys invoke rape myths and gendered stereotypes to challenge victims' credibility and moral character. Using the extracts of two cross-examinations from the celebrity trial CA v. Winslow II (2019), the results highlight how interactional features of questioning reproduce cultural assumptions that legitimate secondary victimization, constructing victims as unreliable or complicit. The findings highlight the “double bind” faced by women in sexual assault trials: they must appear both emotionally credible and rationally composed to be believed, yet any deviation from this ideal invites disbelief. Methodologically, the paper underscores the underutilized potential of EMCA in legal-linguistic research to reveal how institutional talk reproduces gendered injustice through ordinary conversational practices.

本文探讨了在法庭上对经历过性暴力的妇女进行质证时,二次受害是如何相互作用产生的。利用民族方法学、对话分析和成员分类分析,该研究调查了辩护律师如何利用强奸神话和性别刻板印象来挑战受害者的可信度和道德品质。使用名人审判CA v. Winslow II(2019)的两次交叉询问的摘录,结果突出了质疑的相互作用特征如何再现了使二次受害合法化的文化假设,将受害者构建为不可靠或同谋。这些发现凸显了女性在性侵犯审判中面临的“双重困境”:她们必须在情感上可信,在理性上沉着冷静,才能让人相信,但任何偏离这一理想的行为都会引起怀疑。在方法上,本文强调了EMCA在法律语言学研究中未被充分利用的潜力,以揭示制度谈话如何通过日常会话实践再现性别不公正。
{"title":"The “Double Bind” of Gender-Based Violence: Secondary Victimization in Courtroom Cross-Examinations","authors":"Selena Mariano","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines how secondary victimization is interactionally produced during courtroom cross-examinations of women who have experienced sexual violence. Drawing on Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis, the study investigates how defense attorneys invoke rape myths and gendered stereotypes to challenge victims' credibility and moral character. Using the extracts of two cross-examinations from the celebrity trial <i>CA v. Winslow II</i> (2019), the results highlight how interactional features of questioning reproduce cultural assumptions that legitimate secondary victimization, constructing victims as unreliable or complicit. The findings highlight the “double bind” faced by women in sexual assault trials: they must appear both emotionally credible and rationally composed to be believed, yet any deviation from this ideal invites disbelief. Methodologically, the paper underscores the underutilized potential of EMCA in legal-linguistic research to reveal how institutional talk reproduces gendered injustice through ordinary conversational practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"96-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865666/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145588768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1