Pub Date : 2024-09-08DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102708
This study offers a novel empirical examination of the interplay between industrial digitalization and urban spatial dynamics, addressing a significant gap in the existing literature. Using data from 1609 firms in South Korea and employing a generalized structural equation model, this study examines how digitalization influences industries' preferences for urban locations. It diverges from previous theoretical and intuitive approaches, by providing concrete data-driven insights. The role of digitalization in enhancing productivity and spatial efficiency is a critical outcome here, thereby encouraging industries to favor urban areas. It also reveals an unexpected nuance: digitalization does not directly correlate with clean production, challenging prevalent assumptions. By empirically validating the indirect pathways linking digitalization with urban industrial setting, this study contributes uniquely toward understanding technological advancements’ reshaping of urban industrial landscapes. This nuanced insight extends beyond the current discourse, emphasizing the indirect yet substantial influence of digitalization on industrial location choices. This marks a critical advancement in the academic examination of urban industrial dynamics.
{"title":"How does digitalization drive urban industrial locations? An empirical examination of South Korea's experience","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102708","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102708","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study offers a novel empirical examination of the interplay between industrial digitalization and urban spatial dynamics, addressing a significant gap in the existing literature. Using data from 1609 firms in South Korea and employing a generalized structural equation model, this study examines how digitalization influences industries' preferences for urban locations. It diverges from previous theoretical and intuitive approaches, by providing concrete data-driven insights. The role of digitalization in enhancing productivity and spatial efficiency is a critical outcome here, thereby encouraging industries to favor urban areas. It also reveals an unexpected nuance: digitalization does not directly correlate with clean production, challenging prevalent assumptions. By empirically validating the indirect pathways linking digitalization with urban industrial setting, this study contributes uniquely toward understanding technological advancements’ reshaping of urban industrial landscapes. This nuanced insight extends beyond the current discourse, emphasizing the indirect yet substantial influence of digitalization on industrial location choices. This marks a critical advancement in the academic examination of urban industrial dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002562/pdfft?md5=94c61210ee5ffdb0542bd606782446c1&pid=1-s2.0-S0160791X24002562-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142164122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-08DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102709
As the world increasingly faces intersecting and complex environmental, social, and economic challenges, there are rising demands on emerging science and technology to produce innovative and potentially disruptive solutions. However, these solutions may also introduce different problems, uncertainties, and risks. Responsible innovation (RI) offers a way to identify and mitigate the social and ethical risks associated with new science and technology developments while delivering socially desirable and responsible outcomes. But how does the public view RI? In this paper, we argue that those undertaking disruptive science and technology research need a better understanding of the drivers of public trust in the research and innovation sector, and broader societal expectations of what constitutes socially responsible outcomes arising from their work. Few studies have explored if and how RI, trust, and social expectations are interrelated in the eyes of the public. This research investigates public perceptions of RI relevant to the development of novel and potentially disruptive science and technology, and their relationships with two key social outcomes: (1) public trust in the research and innovation sector; and (2) public expectations that innovative and potentially disruptive research can deliver socially responsible outcomes. Through surveying 4080 Australians, this research identifies how these four elements of RI – (i) practices of scientists, (ii) institutional compliance with research ethics, (iii) risk management effectiveness, and (iv) governance arrangements – are associated with public trust and expectations of socially responsible outcomes. Our best fitting path model showed that these elements of RI explain a large proportion of variability in trust in scientists and research institutions undertaking disruptive science, and most of the variability in public expectations that such research can deliver socially responsible outcomes. Of the four elements of RI, practices of scientists are most important for explaining trust in the research and innovation sector, and risk management effectiveness is most important for expectations of socially responsible outcomes from disruptive science and technology.
随着世界越来越多地面临相互交织的复杂环境、社会和经济挑战,对新兴科学和技术提出创新性和潜在颠覆性解决方案的要求也越来越高。然而,这些解决方案也可能带来不同的问题、不确定性和风险。负责任的创新(RI)提供了一种方法,可以识别并降低与新科技发展相关的社会和道德风险,同时提供对社会有益且负责任的成果。但公众如何看待责任创新?在本文中,我们认为从事颠覆性科技研究的人员需要更好地了解公众对研究与创新部门信任的驱动因素,以及社会对其工作所产生的社会负责任成果的更广泛期望。很少有研究探讨公众眼中的社会责任、信任和社会期望是否以及如何相互关联。本研究调查了公众对与新型和潜在颠覆性科技发展相关的 RI 的看法,以及它们与两个关键社会成果之间的关系:(1) 公众对研究和创新部门的信任;(2) 公众对创新和潜在颠覆性研究能够带来对社会负责的成果的期望。通过对 4080 名澳大利亚人进行调查,本研究确定了研究创新的四个要素--(i) 科学家的实践,(ii) 机构对研究伦理的遵守,(iii) 风险管理的有效性,以及 (iv) 治理安排--如何与公众信任和对社会负责成果的期望相关联。我们的最佳拟合路径模型显示,这些 RI 要素可以解释对科学家和从事颠覆性科学研究的机构的信任度的大部分变化,以及公众对此类研究能够产生对社会负责的成果的期望值的大部分变化。在 RI 的四个要素中,科学家的实践对于解释对研究与创新部门的信任最为重要,而风险管理的有效性对于期望颠覆性科学与技术产生对社会负责的成果最为重要。
{"title":"Responsible innovation for disruptive science and technology: The role of public trust and social expectations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102709","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102709","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the world increasingly faces intersecting and complex environmental, social, and economic challenges, there are rising demands on emerging science and technology to produce innovative and potentially disruptive solutions. However, these solutions may also introduce different problems, uncertainties, and risks. Responsible innovation (RI) offers a way to identify and mitigate the social and ethical risks associated with new science and technology developments while delivering socially desirable and responsible outcomes. But how does the public view RI? In this paper, we argue that those undertaking disruptive science and technology research need a better understanding of the drivers of public trust in the research and innovation sector, and broader societal expectations of what constitutes socially responsible outcomes arising from their work. Few studies have explored if and how RI, trust, and social expectations are interrelated in the eyes of the public. This research investigates public perceptions of RI relevant to the development of novel and potentially disruptive science and technology, and their relationships with two key social outcomes: (1) public trust in the research and innovation sector; and (2) public expectations that innovative and potentially disruptive research can deliver socially responsible outcomes. Through surveying 4080 Australians, this research identifies how these four elements of RI – (i) practices of scientists, (ii) institutional compliance with research ethics, (iii) risk management effectiveness, and (iv) governance arrangements – are associated with public trust and expectations of socially responsible outcomes. Our best fitting path model showed that these elements of RI explain a large proportion of variability in trust in scientists and research institutions undertaking disruptive science, and most of the variability in public expectations that such research can deliver socially responsible outcomes. Of the four elements of RI, practices of scientists are most important for explaining trust in the research and innovation sector, and risk management effectiveness is most important for expectations of socially responsible outcomes from disruptive science and technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002574/pdfft?md5=5f0901f65b79ffc23b8e8ab0b010cf02&pid=1-s2.0-S0160791X24002574-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102687
The current study aimed to investigate the results of integrating the planned behavior model with the technology acceptance adoption model, and the differences between age groups in direct and indirect relationships. The empirical data of 203 online purchasing users from the Libyan city of Tripoli via Google surveys analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling. The questionnaire was employed and measured by TPB and TAM models. The most important findings reached are the presence of a significant direct effect of social influence and perceived behavior control impact on purchasing behavior because of the age group of 30–50 years. Likewise, perceived of use has a significant effect on purchasing behavior due to of the age group of 30–50 years and the age group of more than 50 years. Three out of four hypotheses were supported: purchase intention mediates the relationship between social influence and perceived behavior control, perceived usefulness, and ease of use on the one hand and purchasing behavior on the other hand. More, there are significant differences indirect effects of social influence and perceived behavior control and perceived usefulness on purchasing behavior due to the variable of age, more specifically in the age group of (30–50 years), while it was not significant in the other age groups. The research also discussed future directions for research in the field of technology use.
{"title":"The effects of planned behavior model constructs and technology acceptance model constructs on online purchasing behavior: An empirical study on internet users in the Libya city of Tripoli","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102687","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102687","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current study aimed to investigate the results of integrating the planned behavior model with the technology acceptance adoption model, and the differences between age groups in direct and indirect relationships. The empirical data of 203 online purchasing users from the Libyan city of Tripoli via Google surveys analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling. The questionnaire was employed and measured by TPB and TAM models. The most important findings reached are the presence of a significant direct effect of social influence and perceived behavior control impact on purchasing behavior because of the age group of 30–50 years. Likewise, perceived of use has a significant effect on purchasing behavior due to of the age group of 30–50 years and the age group of more than 50 years. Three out of four hypotheses were supported: purchase intention mediates the relationship between social influence and perceived behavior control, perceived usefulness, and ease of use on the one hand and purchasing behavior on the other hand. More, there are significant differences indirect effects of social influence and perceived behavior control and perceived usefulness on purchasing behavior due to the variable of age, more specifically in the age group of (30–50 years), while it was not significant in the other age groups. The research also discussed future directions for research in the field of technology use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142158445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102685
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent in our daily lives, setting specific requirements for responsible development and deployment: The AI should be explainable and inclusive. Despite substantial research and development investment in explainable AI, there is a lack of effort into making AI explainable and inclusive to people with cognitive disabilities as well. In this paper, we present the first steps towards this research topic. We argue that three main questions guide this research, namely: 1) How explainable should a system be?; 2) What level of understanding can the user reach, and what is the right type of explanation to help them reach this level?; and 3) How can we implement an AI system that can generate the necessary explanations? We present the current state of the art in research on these three topics, the current open questions and the next steps. Finally, we present the challenges specific to bringing these three research topics together, in order to eventually be able to answer the question of how to make AI systems explainable also to people with cognitive disabilities.
{"title":"Explainable AI for all - A roadmap for inclusive XAI for people with cognitive disabilities","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102685","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102685","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent in our daily lives, setting specific requirements for responsible development and deployment: The AI should be explainable and inclusive. Despite substantial research and development investment in explainable AI, there is a lack of effort into making AI explainable and inclusive to people with cognitive disabilities as well. In this paper, we present the first steps towards this research topic. We argue that three main questions guide this research, namely: 1) How explainable should a system be?; 2) What level of understanding can the user reach, and what is the right type of explanation to help them reach this level?; and 3) How can we implement an AI system that can generate the necessary explanations? We present the current state of the art in research on these three topics, the current open questions and the next steps. Finally, we present the challenges specific to bringing these three research topics together, in order to eventually be able to answer the question of how to make AI systems explainable also to people with cognitive disabilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002331/pdfft?md5=f48ee62c3dc226480e9c8831c6cd0ece&pid=1-s2.0-S0160791X24002331-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102707
While there is an interest in questions related to empathy and communication technologies (CTs) in various disciplines, conceptual and ethical ambiguities on what empathy exactly is and whether and how it can be shaped by technologies make it unclear how to approach such questions. This paper sets out to provide such a framework: a way to understand empathy and its relationship to CTs in a conceptually and ethically robust manner. A critical reconsideration of the concept is needed, especially if we want to use the concept to evaluate technologies and their impact in terms of desirability and guidance to shape our future. I argue we need to understand empathy explicitly as a moral concept that is contextually situated, relational, and diverse, and to do so, I argue to understand empathy as a virtue. Section 2 lays down the theoretical foundation to explore empathy as a virtue, technological mediation, and CTs. In section 3, I apply these concepts to identify different ways in which CTs can mediate empathy and change what it means to be empathetic on both individual and societal levels. This multi-layered understanding of “CT-mediated empathy” provides a lens through which questions on CTs and empathy can be approached, such that we can reflect on, evaluate and improve specific technologies, their implementation, and their use. In section 4, I summarize this in a list of seven questions that require reflection in the design and implementation of a (new) CT. The paper ends with some forward-looking implications and recommendations for design, research, education, and policy towards an empathetic sociotechnical future.
{"title":"A conceptual and ethical framework for empathy and communication technologies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102707","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102707","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While there is an interest in questions related to empathy and communication technologies (CTs) in various disciplines, conceptual and ethical ambiguities on what empathy exactly is and whether and how it can be shaped by technologies make it unclear how to approach such questions. This paper sets out to provide such a framework: a way to understand empathy and its relationship to CTs in a conceptually and ethically robust manner. A critical reconsideration of the concept is needed, especially if we want to use the concept to evaluate technologies and their impact in terms of desirability and guidance to shape our future. I argue we need to understand empathy explicitly as a moral concept that is contextually situated, relational, and diverse, and to do so, I argue to understand empathy as a virtue. Section 2 lays down the theoretical foundation to explore empathy as a virtue, technological mediation, and CTs. In section 3, I apply these concepts to identify different ways in which CTs can mediate empathy and change what it means to be empathetic on both individual and societal levels. This multi-layered understanding of “CT-mediated empathy” provides a lens through which questions on CTs and empathy can be approached, such that we can reflect on, evaluate and improve specific technologies, their implementation, and their use. In section 4, I summarize this in a list of seven questions that require reflection in the design and implementation of a (new) CT. The paper ends with some forward-looking implications and recommendations for design, research, education, and policy towards an empathetic sociotechnical future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002550/pdfft?md5=ba0e26d4dad374a8bdbf9e0a4fa1696a&pid=1-s2.0-S0160791X24002550-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142171736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-02DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102706
Transformative technologies are the key to leading future technology innovation and economic development. However, with the exchange of technological knowledge among countries and the explosive growth of patented technology, the uneven flow and application of technology across geographic regions has become increasingly apparent, making it more and more difficult to track and absorb potentially transformative technology (PTT). As a proxy, the wake-up trajectories of the sleeping beauty patent family (SBPF) reflect the unbalanced distribution and application of PTT but still lack in-depth discussion. Therefore, this study adopted the parameter-free criteria to identify SBPFs and revealed the globalized diffusion patterns of PTT behind SBPFs' wake-up time and pace trajectories by taking “Polymerase Chain Reaction” technology as an example. The findings show that SBPFs’ wake-up has five-time and four-spatial trajectories and presents a small-scale diffusion in local areas. Meanwhile, PTT shows five diffusion patterns, achieving an unbalanced and centralized diffusion worldwide. These provide theoretical support for predicting the global development of PTT, and practical guidance for choosing technical direction, grasping market opportunities, and optimizing the national innovation environment.
变革性技术是引领未来技术创新和经济发展的关键。然而,随着各国间技术知识的交流和专利技术的爆炸式增长,技术在不同地域间流动和应用的不均衡现象日益明显,使得潜在变革性技术(PTT)的追踪和吸收变得越来越困难。作为替代,睡美人专利家族(SBPF)的唤醒轨迹反映了 PTT 分布和应用的不平衡,但仍缺乏深入探讨。因此,本研究采用无参数标准识别睡美人专利家族,并以 "聚合酶链式反应 "技术为例,揭示了睡美人专利家族唤醒时间和速度轨迹背后的PTT全球化扩散模式。研究结果表明,SBPFs 的唤醒具有五种时间轨迹和四种空间轨迹,在局部地区呈现小规模扩散。同时,PTT 呈现出五种扩散模式,在全球范围内实现了不均衡的集中扩散。这为预测 PTT 在全球的发展提供了理论支持,也为选择技术方向、把握市场机遇、优化国家创新环境提供了实践指导。
{"title":"Wake-up of sleeping beauty patent families: The global non-equilibrium diffusion of technological knowledge","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102706","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102706","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transformative technologies are the key to leading future technology innovation and economic development. However, with the exchange of technological knowledge among countries and the explosive growth of patented technology, the uneven flow and application of technology across geographic regions has become increasingly apparent, making it more and more difficult to track and absorb potentially transformative technology (PTT). As a proxy, the wake-up trajectories of the sleeping beauty patent family (SBPF) reflect the unbalanced distribution and application of PTT but still lack in-depth discussion. Therefore, this study adopted the parameter-free criteria to identify SBPFs and revealed the globalized diffusion patterns of PTT behind SBPFs' wake-up time and pace trajectories by taking “Polymerase Chain Reaction” technology as an example. The findings show that SBPFs’ wake-up has five-time and four-spatial trajectories and presents a small-scale diffusion in local areas. Meanwhile, PTT shows five diffusion patterns, achieving an unbalanced and centralized diffusion worldwide. These provide theoretical support for predicting the global development of PTT, and practical guidance for choosing technical direction, grasping market opportunities, and optimizing the national innovation environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142129203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-02DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102705
As content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) has become more accessible and higher quality, social debates have intensified. Therefore, this study investigates how people perceive and evaluate AI-generated content and accounts compared to human-created accounts and content. We created Instagram accounts representing AI, influencers, and the public and conducted a user study with 43 participants. The participants had difficulty distinguishing AI accounts from human ones. Moreover, there were significant differences in user perceptions concerning the three account types. Participants perceived the AI and influencer accounts as more attractive than the public account, and they rated the quality of AI-generated content as highly as that created by influencers. These findings suggest that the advancement of generative AI could alter the social media landscape and contribute to discussions on the characteristics and ethical problems of AI-generated content.
{"title":"AI vs. human-generated content and accounts on Instagram: User preferences, evaluations, and ethical considerations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102705","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102705","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) has become more accessible and higher quality, social debates have intensified. Therefore, this study investigates how people perceive and evaluate AI-generated content and accounts compared to human-created accounts and content. We created Instagram accounts representing AI, influencers, and the public and conducted a user study with 43 participants. The participants had difficulty distinguishing AI accounts from human ones. Moreover, there were significant differences in user perceptions concerning the three account types. Participants perceived the AI and influencer accounts as more attractive than the public account, and they rated the quality of AI-generated content as highly as that created by influencers. These findings suggest that the advancement of generative AI could alter the social media landscape and contribute to discussions on the characteristics and ethical problems of AI-generated content.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-30DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102702
Recent technological advances have brought both anticipation and uncertainty. Entrepreneurs and external stakeholders in technology industries must distinguish between realistic and unrealistic prospects for new technologies. To address this issue, this study introduces the concept of near-lies defined as idealistic statements formally made by entrepreneurs, such as promises or predictions of a firm's future performance, that might exceed its capacity, potentially leading to future falsehoods. Near-lies differ from existing notions of corporate dishonesty because they are potential falsehoods or assume facts that are unknown at the moment, whereas existing notions represent exposed falsehoods. This concept offers practical implications in the era of advanced technology. To prevent dishonesty, entrepreneurs must engage in transparent communication when offering statements about their firm's future performance, prioritizing the long-term impression management toward external stakeholders. External stakeholders must rely on factual information to predict truths and effectively respond to entrepreneurs' near lies.
{"title":"Near-lies in the era of advanced technology: Anticipation and uncertainty","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102702","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102702","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent technological advances have brought both anticipation and uncertainty. Entrepreneurs and external stakeholders in technology industries must distinguish between realistic and unrealistic prospects for new technologies. To address this issue, this study introduces the concept of <em>near-lies</em> defined as idealistic statements formally made by entrepreneurs, such as promises or predictions of a firm's future performance, that might exceed its capacity, potentially leading to future falsehoods. Near-lies differ from existing notions of corporate dishonesty because they are potential falsehoods or assume facts that are unknown at the moment, whereas existing notions represent exposed falsehoods. This concept offers practical implications in the era of advanced technology. To prevent dishonesty, entrepreneurs must engage in transparent communication when offering statements about their firm's future performance, prioritizing the long-term impression management toward external stakeholders. External stakeholders must rely on factual information to predict truths and effectively respond to entrepreneurs' near lies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142117505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-30DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102703
In the context of sustainable development, the energy crisis and the volatile carbon trading markets have made the integration of green technology increasingly essential. This study explores the spillover effects between green technology innovation (GTI), oil price, clean energy (CE), carbon emissions trading prices (CETP), and sustainable development (SD) using quantile connectedness. The static analysis reveals that the connectedness relationship in extreme quantiles is remarkably more related than the middle quantile. The dynamic results indicate that major events significantly strengthen the overall risk correlation, but spillover effects are asymmetric under different quantiles. Further analysis under extreme market conditions demonstrates that SD and CE have produced a continuous and steady risk spillover to GTI, while CETP increased the risk transmission to GTI following the COVID-19 pandemic. This research underscores the significance of coordinating the development of GTI, energy, carbon markets, and SD by investigating risk contagion mechanisms in various market scenarios. In terms of policy implications, the findings indicate that stable energy system and reasonable carbon prices can stimulate the advancement of GTI.
{"title":"Receiver or transmitter? Unlocking the role of green technology innovation in sustainable development, energy, and carbon markets","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102703","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102703","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the context of sustainable development, the energy crisis and the volatile carbon trading markets have made the integration of green technology increasingly essential. This study explores the spillover effects between green technology innovation (<em>GTI</em>), oil price, clean energy (<em>CE</em>), carbon emissions trading prices (<em>CETP</em>), and sustainable development (<em>SD)</em> using quantile connectedness. The static analysis reveals that the connectedness relationship in extreme quantiles is remarkably more related than the middle quantile. The dynamic results indicate that major events significantly strengthen the overall risk correlation, but spillover effects are asymmetric under different quantiles. Further analysis under extreme market conditions demonstrates that <em>SD</em> and <em>CE</em> have produced a continuous and steady risk spillover to <em>GTI</em>, while <em>CETP</em> increased the risk transmission to <em>GTI</em> following the COVID-19 pandemic. This research underscores the significance of coordinating the development of <em>GTI</em>, energy, carbon markets, and <em>SD</em> by investigating risk contagion mechanisms in various market scenarios. In terms of policy implications, the findings indicate that stable energy system and reasonable carbon prices can stimulate the advancement of <em>GTI</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142096469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-30DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102704
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) rely on a thriving distribution network and digital technologies, including the metaverse, to remain competitive. The retail industry is perceived as a portfolio-based and granular business. Hence, retail SMEs can be a key source of innovation and a major source of growth that need technical flexibility to react quickly to changing customer needs. Therefore, grounded in the TOE framework, this study is undertaken to explore the drivers of metaverse adoption for enhancing the marketing capabilities of retail SMEs. Online surveys were used to gather primary data from 300 marketing practitioners employed in retail SMEs. Subsequently, the data were analysed using quantitative research methodology. The finding reveals that the metaverse is gaining attention from retail SMEs due to its technological, organisational, and environmental drivers, as well as its ability to provide immersive experiences to customers. Thereafter, metaverse adoption enhances the marketing capabilities of SMEs with new sales channels, tailored marketing, and increased customer reach with an understanding of the marketplace focused on customer relations, market research, and cross-management capabilities.
中小型企业(SMEs)依靠繁荣的分销网络和数字技术(包括元世界)来保持竞争力。零售业被认为是以产品组合为基础的细化业务。因此,零售中小型企业可以成为创新的关键源泉和增长的主要来源,它们需要技术灵活性来快速应对不断变化的客户需求。因此,本研究以 TOE 框架为基础,探讨采用元数据提升零售业中小企业营销能力的驱动因素。本研究采用在线调查的方式,从 300 名受雇于零售业中小企业的营销从业人员那里收集原始数据。随后,采用定量研究方法对数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,由于其技术、组织和环境驱动力,以及为客户提供身临其境体验的能力,元数据正日益受到零售业中小企业的关注。此后,通过新的销售渠道、量身定制的市场营销以及对市场的了解(重点是客户关系、市场研究和交叉管理能力),元数据的采用增强了中小企业的营销能力。
{"title":"Drivers of metaverse adoption for enhancing marketing capabilities of retail SMEs","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102704","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102704","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) rely on a thriving distribution network and digital technologies, including the metaverse, to remain competitive. The retail industry is perceived as a portfolio-based and granular business. Hence, retail SMEs can be a key source of innovation and a major source of growth that need technical flexibility to react quickly to changing customer needs. Therefore, grounded in the TOE framework, this study is undertaken to explore the drivers of metaverse adoption for enhancing the marketing capabilities of retail SMEs. Online surveys were used to gather primary data from 300 marketing practitioners employed in retail SMEs. Subsequently, the data were analysed using quantitative research methodology. The finding reveals that the metaverse is gaining attention from retail SMEs due to its technological, organisational, and environmental drivers, as well as its ability to provide immersive experiences to customers. Thereafter, metaverse adoption enhances the marketing capabilities of SMEs with new sales channels, tailored marketing, and increased customer reach with an understanding of the marketplace focused on customer relations, market research, and cross-management capabilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142096470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}