Pub Date : 2025-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103179
John M. Betts , Ana-Maria Bliuc , Daniel S. Courtney
In the face of increasing online polarization, understanding the role of charismatic influencers in shaping public discourse is crucial for those developing mitigation strategies. This study investigates the impact of influencers on the dynamics of polarization in digital environments through agent-based modeling. We examine how an influencer’s charisma and the nature of their message (moderate vs. extremist) affect the ideological and affective dimensions of polarization. Our experiments simulated interactions within an artificial society, manipulating characteristics of the influencer and the society. The results indicate that charismatic influencers with extremist messages accelerate polarization, particularly in more open societies. By contrast, charismatic influencers with moderate messages can reduce the rate of polarization and promote the formation of clusters of moderate individuals in the society. This research highlights the complex role of influencers in either exacerbating or alleviating polarization, and the importance of strategic communication by those seeking to moderate extreme views to preserve democratic values in the digital age.
{"title":"The effect of charismatic influencers on polarization online: An agent-based modeling approach","authors":"John M. Betts , Ana-Maria Bliuc , Daniel S. Courtney","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103179","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103179","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the face of increasing online polarization, understanding the role of charismatic influencers in shaping public discourse is crucial for those developing mitigation strategies. This study investigates the impact of influencers on the dynamics of polarization in digital environments through agent-based modeling. We examine how an influencer’s charisma and the nature of their message (moderate vs. extremist) affect the ideological and affective dimensions of polarization. Our experiments simulated interactions within an artificial society, manipulating characteristics of the influencer and the society. The results indicate that charismatic influencers with extremist messages accelerate polarization, particularly in more open societies. By contrast, charismatic influencers with moderate messages can reduce the rate of polarization and promote the formation of clusters of moderate individuals in the society. This research highlights the complex role of influencers in either exacerbating or alleviating polarization, and the importance of strategic communication by those seeking to moderate extreme views to preserve democratic values in the digital age.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103179"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103180
Dilek Cetindamar , Kunio Shirahada , Yucel Saygin
This Special Issue explores how technology-based regenerative services can strengthen disaster management and foster resilient communities. Drawing on 11 peer-reviewed articles, the collection advances two interlinked themes: (1) regenerative services that move beyond short-term recovery to actively restore ecosystems, social systems, and livelihoods; and (2) technology management in disaster contexts, where tools such as AI must be adapted to unstable, resource-constrained environments. The contributions demonstrate that resilience is multi-dimensional—ecological, socio-technical, and economic—and that technology acts both as an enabler and a barrier, depending on its accessibility, adaptability, and governance. Across the studies, three insights emerge: resilience requires proactive and regenerative strategies, technology is a catalyst for coordination when effectively managed, and equity is central to sustaining resilience. Collectively, the Special Issue underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches that integrate environmental science, social sciences, and technology management to design inclusive, adaptive, and regenerative disaster responses.
{"title":"Managing disasters with advanced technology solutions: Introduction to the special issue","authors":"Dilek Cetindamar , Kunio Shirahada , Yucel Saygin","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103180","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103180","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This Special Issue explores how technology-based regenerative services can strengthen disaster management and foster resilient communities. Drawing on 11 peer-reviewed articles, the collection advances two interlinked themes: (1) regenerative services that move beyond short-term recovery to actively restore ecosystems, social systems, and livelihoods; and (2) technology management in disaster contexts, where tools such as AI must be adapted to unstable, resource-constrained environments. The contributions demonstrate that resilience is multi-dimensional—ecological, socio-technical, and economic—and that technology acts both as an enabler and a barrier, depending on its accessibility, adaptability, and governance. Across the studies, three insights emerge: resilience requires proactive and regenerative strategies, technology is a catalyst for coordination when effectively managed, and equity is central to sustaining resilience. Collectively, the Special Issue underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches that integrate environmental science, social sciences, and technology management to design inclusive, adaptive, and regenerative disaster responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103180"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-23DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103178
Tariq H. Malik , Yanmei Wang , Yifan He
This study examines the civil-military technology proximity-disclosure (PD) fit and its impact on the performance of civilian firms, with a comparative focus on China and the United States. In light of the growing global prominence of civil-military links, this research addresses the strategic tensions between technological proximity (access to military technologies) and technological disclosure (transparency to external stakeholders) in influencing firm outcomes. Leveraging data from 2651 civilian firms across 82 countries, the analysis reveals distinct patterns between Chinese and American firms. Chinese firms, characterised by high proximity and lower disclosure, demonstrate superior performance when they maintain proximity to military technologies and increase their disclosure. Conversely, American firms perform better when they enhance proximity to military technologies while maintaining high disclosure levels. These findings suggest that national contexts significantly shape the optimal PD fit for firm performance, challenging universal approaches to civil-military collaboration in a single universal model. The study contributes to institutional theory by showing how different logics of conformance and legitimacy affect technological integration and firm outcomes in varied political and economic environments. One side of the logic and legitimacy is conformance to the military imperatives, and the other side is conformance to the market imperatives. Policymakers and firms can leverage these insights to craft context-specific strategies for navigating the complexities of civil-military alliances.
{"title":"Civil-military technology proximity and disclosure balance for the civilian Firm's Performance: A comparative study","authors":"Tariq H. Malik , Yanmei Wang , Yifan He","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103178","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103178","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the civil-military technology proximity-disclosure (PD) fit and its impact on the performance of civilian firms, with a comparative focus on China and the United States. In light of the growing global prominence of civil-military links, this research addresses the strategic tensions between technological proximity (access to military technologies) and technological disclosure (transparency to external stakeholders) in influencing firm outcomes. Leveraging data from 2651 civilian firms across 82 countries, the analysis reveals distinct patterns between Chinese and American firms. Chinese firms, characterised by high proximity and lower disclosure, demonstrate superior performance when they maintain proximity to military technologies and increase their disclosure. Conversely, American firms perform better when they enhance proximity to military technologies while maintaining high disclosure levels. These findings suggest that national contexts significantly shape the optimal PD fit for firm performance, challenging universal approaches to civil-military collaboration in a single universal model. The study contributes to institutional theory by showing how different logics of conformance and legitimacy affect technological integration and firm outcomes in varied political and economic environments. One side of the logic and legitimacy is conformance to the military imperatives, and the other side is conformance to the market imperatives. Policymakers and firms can leverage these insights to craft context-specific strategies for navigating the complexities of civil-military alliances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103178"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103174
Deniz Tuncalp , Dilek Cetindamar
Large-scale disasters often reveal a structural disconnect between formal state agencies and agile grassroots humanitarian organizations. This study investigates how digital platforms can bridge this institutional gap. Employing a qualitative case study of the grassroots organization Ahbap during the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes, we thematically analyze 1577 X posts. Findings demonstrate that Ahbap leveraged social media not only for resource mobilization and community engagement but also for performing radical transparency and engaging in strategic coordination with formal state actors. Based on these findings, the study develops the "regenerative synergy" framework, which illustrates how digital platforms can facilitate a hybrid governance model that links the agility of grassroots actors with the scale of formal institutions. This study makes concrete theoretical contributions to disaster management literature and provides actionable insights for policymakers and practitioners on integrating grassroots digital practices into formal response strategies.
{"title":"Grassroots digital humanitarianism and regenerative synergy in the 2023 Türkiye earthquake","authors":"Deniz Tuncalp , Dilek Cetindamar","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103174","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103174","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large-scale disasters often reveal a structural disconnect between formal state agencies and agile grassroots humanitarian organizations. This study investigates how digital platforms can bridge this institutional gap. Employing a qualitative case study of the grassroots organization Ahbap during the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes, we thematically analyze 1577 X posts. Findings demonstrate that Ahbap leveraged social media not only for resource mobilization and community engagement but also for performing radical transparency and engaging in strategic coordination with formal state actors. Based on these findings, the study develops the \"regenerative synergy\" framework, which illustrates how digital platforms can facilitate a hybrid governance model that links the agility of grassroots actors with the scale of formal institutions. This study makes concrete theoretical contributions to disaster management literature and provides actionable insights for policymakers and practitioners on integrating grassroots digital practices into formal response strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103174"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145624733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The growing demand for qualified professionals for the twin green and digital transition exceeds the supply of candidates, highlighting the urgency of effective educational methods for qualifying individuals in a circular economy (CE). However, despite the CE field having made several advances in terms of academic research and practical applications, teaching the CE has not received proper attention. Recently, the skills required in a twin transition have been defined, along with a framework identifying which of these skills should be fostered in new educational initiatives. However, it is still not clear which teaching methods are most suitable to support education in CE. This study, based on a systematic literature review, identifies 11 teaching methods, such as case studies, project-based learning, and gamification, that develop technical, digital and resilience skills. Given the continuous evolution and interdisciplinarity of the CE, particularly when combined with digital technologies, the delivery of knowledge necessitates appropriate and flexible approaches. By providing theoretical and practical implications, the study guides educators and policymakers in creating curricula aligned with market demands, promoting interdisciplinary education for the twin transition.
{"title":"Teaching methods for building human capital for the twin transition: a skill-based approach","authors":"Adriana Hofmann Trevisan , Iskra Dukovska-Popovska , Federica Acerbi , Sergio Terzi , Claudio Sassanelli","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103172","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103172","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for qualified professionals for the twin green and digital transition exceeds the supply of candidates, highlighting the urgency of effective educational methods for qualifying individuals in a circular economy (CE). However, despite the CE field having made several advances in terms of academic research and practical applications, teaching the CE has not received proper attention. Recently, the skills required in a twin transition have been defined, along with a framework identifying which of these skills should be fostered in new educational initiatives. However, it is still not clear which teaching methods are most suitable to support education in CE. This study, based on a systematic literature review, identifies 11 teaching methods, such as case studies, project-based learning, and gamification, that develop technical, digital and resilience skills. Given the continuous evolution and interdisciplinarity of the CE, particularly when combined with digital technologies, the delivery of knowledge necessitates appropriate and flexible approaches. By providing theoretical and practical implications, the study guides educators and policymakers in creating curricula aligned with market demands, promoting interdisciplinary education for the twin transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103172"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103176
Chen Renfei , Li Zhongwen
Despite increasing managerial focus on Artificial Intelligence (AI) -enhanced environmental strategies, few studies have examined how dynamic sustainable capabilities (DSC) and AI-enabled circular business model innovation (CBMI) affect sustainability-oriented corporate performance (SOCP). Grounded in dynamic capabilities theory and dynamic managerial capabilities theory, this study develops a unified framework to investigate the mechanisms through which DSC fosters AI capabilities and CBMI, ultimately enhancing SOCP, while examining managerial cognition as a key moderator. This study empirically analyzes data from 289 questionnaires from 120 manufacturing companies through the PLS-SEM method. The findings reveal that DSC has a positive effect on AI capabilities, CBMI, and SOCP. AI capabilities and CBMI partially mediate the DSC-SOCP relationship. Managerial cognition positively contributes to the role of CBMI on SOCP, and AI capabilities have a positive effect on CBMI. This study advances the literature by elucidating the sequential pathways from DSC to AI-driven CBMI, highlighting micro-foundations for circular transitions. Moreover, this study extends managerial cognition to CBMI practices, revealing the synergies between managerial cognition and CBMI and its role in accelerating SOCP, contributing to clarifying the sources of performance differences in circular economy practices. This lays the foundation for future research agendas on AI integration in the circular economy.
{"title":"Empirical analysis of the roles of dynamic sustainable capabilities and artificial intelligence in accelerating circular business model innovation: Insights from Chinese manufacturing firms","authors":"Chen Renfei , Li Zhongwen","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103176","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103176","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite increasing managerial focus on Artificial Intelligence (AI) -enhanced environmental strategies, few studies have examined how dynamic sustainable capabilities (DSC) and AI-enabled circular business model innovation (CBMI) affect sustainability-oriented corporate performance (SOCP). Grounded in dynamic capabilities theory and dynamic managerial capabilities theory, this study develops a unified framework to investigate the mechanisms through which DSC fosters AI capabilities and CBMI, ultimately enhancing SOCP, while examining managerial cognition as a key moderator. This study empirically analyzes data from 289 questionnaires from 120 manufacturing companies through the PLS-SEM method. The findings reveal that DSC has a positive effect on AI capabilities, CBMI, and SOCP. AI capabilities and CBMI partially mediate the DSC-SOCP relationship. Managerial cognition positively contributes to the role of CBMI on SOCP, and AI capabilities have a positive effect on CBMI. This study advances the literature by elucidating the sequential pathways from DSC to AI-driven CBMI, highlighting micro-foundations for circular transitions. Moreover, this study extends managerial cognition to CBMI practices, revealing the synergies between managerial cognition and CBMI and its role in accelerating SOCP, contributing to clarifying the sources of performance differences in circular economy practices. This lays the foundation for future research agendas on AI integration in the circular economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103176"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103177
Chien-Hsiang Liao , Yu-Hui Fang , Chia-Ying Li
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative force reshaping how individuals work, live, and interact with their environments. Despite its rapid diffusion, research has yet to clarify the psychological mechanisms driving individual-level GenAI adoption and resistance. This study addresses this critical gap by proposing a dual-path model grounded in Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) and an extended Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) framework. UGT explains the positive, need-fulfilling motivations for GenAI use, incorporating novel gratification constructs such as serendipity, perceived diagnosticity, tangibility, curiosity fulfillment, and enjoyment. In contrast, the enhanced PMT framework captures both traditional and extended pathways of perceived threats. By including fear of losing power (FLP) and fear of missing out (FoMO) as internal psychological mechanisms, this study offers a more comprehensive account of GenAI adoption and resistance. Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy are introduced as moderators, delineating how individual differences shape protective responses. Using data from a two-wave longitudinal survey of 1271 ChatGPT users, the findings reveal that UGT-related factors primarily drive adoption, while traditional and extended PMT factors explain resistance behaviors. Notably, FoMO functions as a dual-pathway factor, facilitating adoption and mitigating resistance. Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy demonstrate partial moderating effects, underscoring the role of personal dispositions in shaping user behavior. This study contributes theoretically by integrating positive gratification and protective aversion into a unified model of GenAI use. Practically, it provides actionable insights for designing adaptive, user-centered AI systems that enhance engagement while reducing resistance.
{"title":"Out of gratification or fears? A dual model to explore drivers of generative artificial intelligence adoption","authors":"Chien-Hsiang Liao , Yu-Hui Fang , Chia-Ying Li","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103177","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103177","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative force reshaping how individuals work, live, and interact with their environments. Despite its rapid diffusion, research has yet to clarify the psychological mechanisms driving individual-level GenAI adoption and resistance. This study addresses this critical gap by proposing a dual-path model grounded in Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) and an extended Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) framework. UGT explains the positive, need-fulfilling motivations for GenAI use, incorporating novel gratification constructs such as serendipity, perceived diagnosticity, tangibility, curiosity fulfillment, and enjoyment. In contrast, the enhanced PMT framework captures both traditional and extended pathways of perceived threats. By including fear of losing power (FLP) and fear of missing out (FoMO) as internal psychological mechanisms, this study offers a more comprehensive account of GenAI adoption and resistance. Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy are introduced as moderators, delineating how individual differences shape protective responses. Using data from a two-wave longitudinal survey of 1271 ChatGPT users, the findings reveal that UGT-related factors primarily drive adoption, while traditional and extended PMT factors explain resistance behaviors. Notably, FoMO functions as a dual-pathway factor, facilitating adoption and mitigating resistance. Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy demonstrate partial moderating effects, underscoring the role of personal dispositions in shaping user behavior. This study contributes theoretically by integrating positive gratification and protective aversion into a unified model of GenAI use. Practically, it provides actionable insights for designing adaptive, user-centered AI systems that enhance engagement while reducing resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103177"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145624732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103173
Bingqin Han , Diyi Liu
As AI humanoid robots increasingly enter domestic spaces, understanding the multifaceted drivers of user acceptance becomes crucial. However, existing technology acceptance models often overlook the unique contextual and emotional demands of home settings, the spaces characterized by intimacy, informality, and privacy sensitivity. This study proposes a novel “onion model” of AI humanoid robot acceptance in home settings, structured across three layers: technical, psychological, and social. Drawing on data from 1373 individuals in China, results reveal that technical performance, particularly reliability (β = 0.355) and usability (β = 0.341), serves as the foundational layer of acceptance, while customization (β = 0.230) and cost–benefit evaluation (β = 0.325) significantly enhance user attachment and rational justification. Perceived intrusiveness strongly deters acceptance (β = −0.101), reflecting heightened privacy sensitivities in home environments. For social factor, peer influence was also found to play a significant role (β = 0.207), highlighting the importance of collective norms in shaping individual decisions. The findings contribute both a contextually grounded and theoretically novel framework for understanding AI adoption, offering actionable insights for developers, policymakers, and researchers seeking to advance human–AI integration in everyday life.
{"title":"Peeling back acceptance: An onion model of AI humanoid robot adoption in homes","authors":"Bingqin Han , Diyi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103173","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103173","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As AI humanoid robots increasingly enter domestic spaces, understanding the multifaceted drivers of user acceptance becomes crucial. However, existing technology acceptance models often overlook the unique contextual and emotional demands of home settings, the spaces characterized by intimacy, informality, and privacy sensitivity. This study proposes a novel “onion model” of AI humanoid robot acceptance in home settings, structured across three layers: technical, psychological, and social. Drawing on data from 1373 individuals in China, results reveal that technical performance, particularly reliability (β = 0.355) and usability (β = 0.341), serves as the foundational layer of acceptance, while customization (β = 0.230) and cost–benefit evaluation (β = 0.325) significantly enhance user attachment and rational justification. Perceived intrusiveness strongly deters acceptance (β = −0.101), reflecting heightened privacy sensitivities in home environments. For social factor, peer influence was also found to play a significant role (β = 0.207), highlighting the importance of collective norms in shaping individual decisions. The findings contribute both a contextually grounded and theoretically novel framework for understanding AI adoption, offering actionable insights for developers, policymakers, and researchers seeking to advance human–AI integration in everyday life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103173"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103175
Hafiz Syed Mohsin Abbas
State fragility is a complex challenge that demands multi-actor governance strategies. The New Public Governance framework offers an innovative approach by integrating technology, institutional reforms, and diaspora engagement to mitigate state fragility while aligning with Sustainable Development Goals. Using empirical evidence from GMM, this study demonstrates that networked e-participation and institutional liberalization are pivotal in reducing fragility, with technology-driven public engagement and rule-of-law governance playing critical roles across all development levels. We also find that low-income countries benefit significantly from diaspora contributions, enhancing labor mobility, socioeconomic stability, and expert knowledge compared to upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income nations. However, lower-middle-income economies exhibit weaker responsiveness to technological and institutional innovations, limiting their ability to harness migration advantages. The study advocates for mutually beneficial foreign policies that discourage brain drain while fostering tech-business collaborations between developed and developing nations. Policymakers must prioritize digital innovation through AI adoption and blockchain for transparent participation, enhance digital platforms for freelancers, and develop skills in struggling economies. The policymakers should also channel remittance systems and reduce taxation in struggling economies to promote economic liberties. For institutional liberation, they should strengthen institutions by building social cohesion. Additionally, poverty and unemployment reductions should boost economic growth and mitigate fragility. Regarding the diaspora effect, countries should ease their migration and refugee policies, providing appropriate rights and opportunities for integration into society, contributing to state development. They should also ensure joint ventures and institutional resilience to maintain political and economic sovereignty in fragile states.
{"title":"Technology, institutions, and migration: A fusional governance framework for mitigating state fragility","authors":"Hafiz Syed Mohsin Abbas","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103175","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103175","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>State fragility is a complex challenge that demands multi-actor governance strategies. The New Public Governance framework offers an innovative approach by integrating technology, institutional reforms, and diaspora engagement to mitigate state fragility while aligning with Sustainable Development Goals. Using empirical evidence from GMM, this study demonstrates that networked e-participation and institutional liberalization are pivotal in reducing fragility, with technology-driven public engagement and rule-of-law governance playing critical roles across all development levels. We also find that low-income countries benefit significantly from diaspora contributions, enhancing labor mobility, socioeconomic stability, and expert knowledge compared to upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income nations. However, lower-middle-income economies exhibit weaker responsiveness to technological and institutional innovations, limiting their ability to harness migration advantages. The study advocates for mutually beneficial foreign policies that discourage brain drain while fostering tech-business collaborations between developed and developing nations. Policymakers must prioritize digital innovation through AI adoption and blockchain for transparent participation, enhance digital platforms for freelancers, and develop skills in struggling economies. The policymakers should also channel remittance systems and reduce taxation in struggling economies to promote economic liberties. For institutional liberation, they should strengthen institutions by building social cohesion. Additionally, poverty and unemployment reductions should boost economic growth and mitigate fragility. Regarding the diaspora effect, countries should ease their migration and refugee policies, providing appropriate rights and opportunities for integration into society, contributing to state development. They should also ensure joint ventures and institutional resilience to maintain political and economic sovereignty in fragile states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103175"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103170
Huai-Wei Lo , Sheng-Wei Lin
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence–driven technologies has underscored the need for universities to undergo a comprehensive digital transformation. This study introduces a novel hybrid framework that combines the Bayesian best–worst method (BBWM) with machine learning techniques to identify and assess key success factors for university digital transformation. This study integrates expert clustering analysis and predictive modeling validation to provide enhanced decision support capabilities. Through systematic evaluation of 27 experts across 5 key dimensions—digital infrastructure, teaching and learning, research, administration and governance, and stakeholder engagement—the analysis revealed critical insights into transformation priorities. Clustering analysis identified seven distinct stakeholder assessment patterns, demonstrating significant heterogeneity in evaluation approaches across professional backgrounds and experience levels. Digital skills and literacy development emerged as the most influential factor, followed by the availability of online learning resources and the adequacy of network infrastructure. Methodological validation demonstrated exceptional convergence between the BBWM and traditional BWM (correlation coefficient: 0.9961), whereas machine learning validation confirmed the robustness of dimensional priority hierarchies through feature importance analysis. The hybrid framework achieved a ranking confidence of 70.23 % and provides stakeholder-specific insights for developing differentiated implementation strategies. This study contributes to the digital transformation literature by presenting the first integration of Bayesian inference and machine learning for university assessment, providing evidence-based frameworks to support strategic technology planning and resource allocation in an increasingly digital educational landscape.
{"title":"A hybrid Bayesian BWM-machine learning framework for university digital transformation assessment: Integrating expert clustering and predictive validation","authors":"Huai-Wei Lo , Sheng-Wei Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103170","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103170","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence–driven technologies has underscored the need for universities to undergo a comprehensive digital transformation. This study introduces a novel hybrid framework that combines the Bayesian best–worst method (BBWM) with machine learning techniques to identify and assess key success factors for university digital transformation. This study integrates expert clustering analysis and predictive modeling validation to provide enhanced decision support capabilities. Through systematic evaluation of 27 experts across 5 key dimensions—digital infrastructure, teaching and learning, research, administration and governance, and stakeholder engagement—the analysis revealed critical insights into transformation priorities. Clustering analysis identified seven distinct stakeholder assessment patterns, demonstrating significant heterogeneity in evaluation approaches across professional backgrounds and experience levels. Digital skills and literacy development emerged as the most influential factor, followed by the availability of online learning resources and the adequacy of network infrastructure. Methodological validation demonstrated exceptional convergence between the BBWM and traditional BWM (correlation coefficient: 0.9961), whereas machine learning validation confirmed the robustness of dimensional priority hierarchies through feature importance analysis. The hybrid framework achieved a ranking confidence of 70.23 % and provides stakeholder-specific insights for developing differentiated implementation strategies. This study contributes to the digital transformation literature by presenting the first integration of Bayesian inference and machine learning for university assessment, providing evidence-based frameworks to support strategic technology planning and resource allocation in an increasingly digital educational landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103170"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}