Pub Date : 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2280100
Dana Fennell, Clay A. Hipke
ABSTRACTPolitical battles over strip clubs’ existence are informed by research, but existing literature neglects a central component of strippers’ work. This study analyzes strippers’ pole work and heeds dancers’ calls to incorporate their voices. It provides an overview of why strippers engage in this skilled and often voluntary physical labor (drawing from social learning theory), and portrays the functions of poling utilizing concepts from the sociology of work. The study is based on ethnographic data, primarily in-depth interviews with strippers. It develops ideas in the sociology of work by demonstrating how in a non-standard work environment like strip clubs, relative autonomy allowed workers to diversify the end game or work goals despite controlling and self-alienating aspects of the job. Strippers were able to engage in what we refer to as skill optioning (making the most of their skills to leverage gains). The result was that some strippers developed the physical skill of poling and performed for more than monetary rewards; it helped give their work more meaning and enjoyment. Poling built physical capital, minimized emotional labor, developed social networks, and provided psychological benefits. AcknowledgementsThank you to all the strippers and interviewees who shared their stories with us. We appreciate the support of the Committee on Services & Resources for Women at USM. Thanks to the SSGS research group for their humor, support, and feedback during the writing of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Twenty interviewees were recruited from the same strip club in the southeastern U.S., but the vast majority of those had experience dancing in other clubs. Most interviews took place individually but in a couple instances two dancers were interviewed simultaneously.2 The project was approved by the University of Southern Mississippi’s IRB #:22–1041. As initial interviews were conducted, some strippers did not want to have a record of their participation; therefore, the IRB waived signed documentation of consent. Participants were given a written informed consent form, and they verbally confirmed their willingness to participate when interviewed. At the beginning and end of the interview we discussed what information needed to remain confidential and what (if anything) could be shared using the respondent’s real name, online handle, and/or work alias.3 Since “flow” experiences involve a lack of self-consciousness (Csikszentmihalyi Citation2008), pole dancing did not always lead to a complete experience of this kind.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDana FennellDr. Dana Fennell is a Professor of Sociology whose work focuses on people’s well-being.Clay A. HipkeDr. Clay Hipke is a sociologist with specialties in deviance and sociology of the body.
{"title":"Flying as Self-Expression: Autonomy and Pole Dancing in Strip Clubs","authors":"Dana Fennell, Clay A. Hipke","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2280100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2280100","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPolitical battles over strip clubs’ existence are informed by research, but existing literature neglects a central component of strippers’ work. This study analyzes strippers’ pole work and heeds dancers’ calls to incorporate their voices. It provides an overview of why strippers engage in this skilled and often voluntary physical labor (drawing from social learning theory), and portrays the functions of poling utilizing concepts from the sociology of work. The study is based on ethnographic data, primarily in-depth interviews with strippers. It develops ideas in the sociology of work by demonstrating how in a non-standard work environment like strip clubs, relative autonomy allowed workers to diversify the end game or work goals despite controlling and self-alienating aspects of the job. Strippers were able to engage in what we refer to as skill optioning (making the most of their skills to leverage gains). The result was that some strippers developed the physical skill of poling and performed for more than monetary rewards; it helped give their work more meaning and enjoyment. Poling built physical capital, minimized emotional labor, developed social networks, and provided psychological benefits. AcknowledgementsThank you to all the strippers and interviewees who shared their stories with us. We appreciate the support of the Committee on Services & Resources for Women at USM. Thanks to the SSGS research group for their humor, support, and feedback during the writing of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Twenty interviewees were recruited from the same strip club in the southeastern U.S., but the vast majority of those had experience dancing in other clubs. Most interviews took place individually but in a couple instances two dancers were interviewed simultaneously.2 The project was approved by the University of Southern Mississippi’s IRB #:22–1041. As initial interviews were conducted, some strippers did not want to have a record of their participation; therefore, the IRB waived signed documentation of consent. Participants were given a written informed consent form, and they verbally confirmed their willingness to participate when interviewed. At the beginning and end of the interview we discussed what information needed to remain confidential and what (if anything) could be shared using the respondent’s real name, online handle, and/or work alias.3 Since “flow” experiences involve a lack of self-consciousness (Csikszentmihalyi Citation2008), pole dancing did not always lead to a complete experience of this kind.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDana FennellDr. Dana Fennell is a Professor of Sociology whose work focuses on people’s well-being.Clay A. HipkeDr. Clay Hipke is a sociologist with specialties in deviance and sociology of the body.","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135539851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-24DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2273904
Devi Sekar, Mohanraj Bhuvaneswari
{"title":"Drug Dependency Due to Traumatic Childhood Experiences and Low Emotional Intelligence of Juvenile Felons in India","authors":"Devi Sekar, Mohanraj Bhuvaneswari","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2273904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2273904","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135322197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-23DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2271627
Petter Gottschalk
This article presents a case study from Norway that supplements previous research in other jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom regarding lack of justice when corporate investigators conduct internal examinations in client organizations. The case is concerned with a university researcher who was investigated after allegations of violating the national working environment act. Investigators applied likelihood of fifty percent rather than the criteria of incident beyond any reasonable doubt. There was no real contradiction offered, and many more deviance from a fair process occurred when compared to the public criminal justice system. The presented maturity model with four stages is applied to illustrate the low level of investigative performance in the case. This research does not in any way claim that the presented case is representative of work by corporate investigators conducting internal examinations in client organizations. Nevertheless, this research is important, as it illustrates the lack of justice that is caused by the absence of regulation of the private investigation industry as performed by law firms, audit firms, consulting firms, and others.
{"title":"Workplace Deviance Investigations: A Case Study of the Application of Maturity Model to a University Investigation","authors":"Petter Gottschalk","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2271627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2271627","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a case study from Norway that supplements previous research in other jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom regarding lack of justice when corporate investigators conduct internal examinations in client organizations. The case is concerned with a university researcher who was investigated after allegations of violating the national working environment act. Investigators applied likelihood of fifty percent rather than the criteria of incident beyond any reasonable doubt. There was no real contradiction offered, and many more deviance from a fair process occurred when compared to the public criminal justice system. The presented maturity model with four stages is applied to illustrate the low level of investigative performance in the case. This research does not in any way claim that the presented case is representative of work by corporate investigators conducting internal examinations in client organizations. Nevertheless, this research is important, as it illustrates the lack of justice that is caused by the absence of regulation of the private investigation industry as performed by law firms, audit firms, consulting firms, and others.","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"21 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135413025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-23DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2272700
Stephen W. Baron
ABSTRACTThe research examines Hirschi’s redefinition of self-control and its link to violence. Utilizing a sample of 287 homeless street youth the paper explores the criminogenic impacts of three different operationalizations of self-control. It investigates the direct effects of bonding self-control, attitudinal self-control, and decisional self-control on violence and assesses the indirect relationships that bonding self-control and attitudinal self-control have with violence through their associations with decisional self-control. Results indicate all three measures of self-control contribute to the understanding of intentions to engage in violence. Further, evidence reveals that both bonding self-control and attitudinal self-control have indirect links to offending through their impact on decisional self-control. Findings are discussed and suggestions for future research offered. AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks to Ashley DePaola for her assistance. The author would also like to express appreciation to the referees and editor for their helpful comments and guidance in improving the article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Exploratory analysis was undertaken examining alternative coding strategies of the dependent variable (e.g., logging the dependent variable; taking the square root of the dependent variable; recoding the most extreme of the outliers in the dependent variable [those at or above the 90th percentile in the distribution] to the 90th percentile). The results of this process indicated that these procedures produced substantively similar results but showed decreased model fits in each case when compared to the original coding of the dependent variable. Therefore, the decision was made to use the current coding of the dependent variable.2 Hirschi’s own methodological tactic of dichotomizing each indicator of the social bond and then summing the items was also explored. In each case responses of usually/always for the family measures, agree and strongly agree for school, and disagree/strongly disagree for belief were coded as 1 with other categories coded 0. The alpha determining the reliability for this dichotomized additive scale was .72. Throughout the analyses the Likert version of the variable performed better and was ultimately chosen as the preferred measure.3 This variable might be interpreted to be a behavioral measure of self-control. Additional analysis showed that removing this variable from the equations did increase the relationships between the attitudinal self-control measure and violence but did not impact the overall substantive results.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Social Sciences Research Council of Canada [435-2017-0188].Notes on contributorsStephen W. BaronStephen W. Baron is a professor in the Department of Sociology at Queen’s University. His research focuses primarily on homeless street youth and crime and substance abuse. H
摘要本研究考察了Hirschi对自我控制的重新定义及其与暴力的联系。利用287个无家可归的街头青年的样本，本文探讨了三种不同的操作自我控制的犯罪影响。研究了结合性自我控制、态度性自我控制和决策性自我控制对暴力行为的直接影响，并通过结合性自我控制和态度性自我控制与决策性自我控制的关联，评估了它们与暴力行为之间的间接关系。结果表明，所有三种自我控制的测量都有助于理解参与暴力的意图。此外，有证据表明，结合性自我控制和态度性自我控制都通过对决策性自我控制的影响而与犯罪存在间接联系。讨论了研究结果，并对今后的研究提出了建议。特别感谢Ashley DePaola的帮助。作者也要感谢审稿人和编辑对本文的改进提出的有益意见和指导。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1进行了探索性分析，检查了因变量的替代编码策略(例如，记录因变量;取因变量的平方根;将因变量中最极端的异常值(分布中处于或高于第90百分位数的异常值)重新编码到第90百分位数。这一过程的结果表明，这些程序产生了本质上相似的结果，但与原始编码的因变量相比，每种情况下的模型拟合度都有所下降。因此，决定使用因变量2的当前编码Hirschi自己的方法策略，将社会关系的每个指标进行二分，然后将项目相加，也进行了探索。在每种情况下，通常/总是对家庭措施，同意和强烈同意对学校，不同意/强烈不同意对信仰的反应被编码为1，其他类别编码为0。决定该二分类加性量表可靠性的alpha值为0.72。在整个分析中，李克特版本的变量表现得更好，最终被选为首选的测量方法这个变量可以解释为自我控制的一种行为度量。进一步的分析表明，从方程中删除这个变量确实增加了态度自我控制测量和暴力之间的关系，但并不影响总体的实质性结果。本研究由加拿大社会科学研究理事会[435-2017-0188]资助。作者简介stephen W. BaronStephen W. Baron是女王大学社会学系的教授。他的研究主要集中在无家可归的街头青年、犯罪和药物滥用。他关心的是如何利用各种犯罪学理论来帮助我们理解无家可归的街头青年人群的这些行为形式。他对这类问题的研究发表在各种学术期刊上，包括犯罪学、《犯罪与犯罪研究杂志》、《司法季刊》、《越轨行为》、《人际暴力杂志》、《刑事司法与行为》、《犯罪与司法杂志》和《犯罪与犯罪》。
{"title":"Street Youth, Violence, and Hirschi’s Redefinition of Self-Control","authors":"Stephen W. Baron","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2272700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2272700","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe research examines Hirschi’s redefinition of self-control and its link to violence. Utilizing a sample of 287 homeless street youth the paper explores the criminogenic impacts of three different operationalizations of self-control. It investigates the direct effects of bonding self-control, attitudinal self-control, and decisional self-control on violence and assesses the indirect relationships that bonding self-control and attitudinal self-control have with violence through their associations with decisional self-control. Results indicate all three measures of self-control contribute to the understanding of intentions to engage in violence. Further, evidence reveals that both bonding self-control and attitudinal self-control have indirect links to offending through their impact on decisional self-control. Findings are discussed and suggestions for future research offered. AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks to Ashley DePaola for her assistance. The author would also like to express appreciation to the referees and editor for their helpful comments and guidance in improving the article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Exploratory analysis was undertaken examining alternative coding strategies of the dependent variable (e.g., logging the dependent variable; taking the square root of the dependent variable; recoding the most extreme of the outliers in the dependent variable [those at or above the 90th percentile in the distribution] to the 90th percentile). The results of this process indicated that these procedures produced substantively similar results but showed decreased model fits in each case when compared to the original coding of the dependent variable. Therefore, the decision was made to use the current coding of the dependent variable.2 Hirschi’s own methodological tactic of dichotomizing each indicator of the social bond and then summing the items was also explored. In each case responses of usually/always for the family measures, agree and strongly agree for school, and disagree/strongly disagree for belief were coded as 1 with other categories coded 0. The alpha determining the reliability for this dichotomized additive scale was .72. Throughout the analyses the Likert version of the variable performed better and was ultimately chosen as the preferred measure.3 This variable might be interpreted to be a behavioral measure of self-control. Additional analysis showed that removing this variable from the equations did increase the relationships between the attitudinal self-control measure and violence but did not impact the overall substantive results.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Social Sciences Research Council of Canada [435-2017-0188].Notes on contributorsStephen W. BaronStephen W. Baron is a professor in the Department of Sociology at Queen’s University. His research focuses primarily on homeless street youth and crime and substance abuse. H","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"59 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135413027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-19DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2270125
Sara L. Bryson, Erica R. Fissel
ABSTRACTDespite decades of research on bullying and the influx of studies examining cyberbullying, there is no universal definition for either term. The lack of clarity in defining these terms may impact individuals’ ability to identify (cyber)bullying. Most prior research on bullying and cyberbullying has surveyed school children, their peers, and teachers about their experiences. However, much less research has examined if members of the general public can identify bullying and cyberbullying outside of the school setting. Therefore, the overall objective of the current study is to investigate adults’ ability to identify bullying and cyberbullying and examine the rationale for why respondents identified – or not – instances of verbal, physical, and cyberbullying. Data were collected from 652 adults aged 18 to 50 years old who were residing in the United States. Results suggest that most respondents identified each scenario as (cyber)bullying, however, the rationale behind their decisions varied. Seven themes were identified (e.g. repetition, power imbalance) as both reasons participants identified a situation as a form of bullying, along with reasons why they did not believe a situation was a form of bullying. Implications for policy, practice, and research are provided. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe University of Central Florida provided Institutional Review Board Approval.Consent to participateThe University of Central Florida Institutional Review Board determined the study met the criteria for Exemption. As such, respondents were provided with an Explanation of Research Page and written consent was waived.Notes1 Some respondents chose not to answer this question and others did not answer the prompt provided (i.e., gave nonsensical responses).2 Many responses were coded with multiple themes, thus, the total number of codes were higher than the number of responses.3 See Appendices A through C for more information related to the selected definitions.Additional informationFundingData collection was supported by internal funding provided by the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Central Florida.Notes on contributorsSara L. BrysonSara L. Bryson, PhD, is an assistant professor in the Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology at East Carolina University. Her research focuses on decision-making within the juvenile justice system, juvenile delinquency, and bullying victimization. Her most recent research appears in Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, and the Journal of Crime and Justice.Erica R. FisselErica R. Fissel, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Central Florida, with a secondary affiliation with Violence Against Women Research Cluster. Her primary research interests currently focus on interpersonal victimization that occurs in cyberspace, including cyberstalki
摘要尽管对欺凌的研究已经持续了几十年，对网络欺凌的研究也层出不穷，但这两个术语都没有一个统一的定义。这些术语的定义不明确可能会影响个人识别(网络)欺凌的能力。先前大多数关于欺凌和网络欺凌的研究都调查了在校儿童、他们的同龄人和老师的经历。然而，很少有研究调查普通公众是否能在学校环境之外识别欺凌和网络欺凌。因此，本研究的总体目标是调查成年人识别欺凌和网络欺凌的能力，并研究为什么受访者识别或不识别言语、身体和网络欺凌的基本原理。数据来自652名年龄在18岁到50岁之间居住在美国的成年人。结果表明，大多数受访者认为每种情况都是(网络)欺凌，然而，他们决定背后的理由各不相同。确定了七个主题(例如，重复、权力不平衡)，作为参与者确定某种情况是一种欺凌形式的原因，以及他们不认为某种情况是一种欺凌形式的原因。为政策、实践和研究提供了启示。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。伦理批准中佛罗里达大学提供机构审查委员会批准。中佛罗里达大学机构审查委员会确定该研究符合豁免标准。因此，向受访者提供了研究页面的解释，并放弃了书面同意。注1有些受访者选择不回答这个问题，有些人没有回答所提供的提示(即给出了无意义的回答)2 .许多回答被多个主题编码，因此，编码的总数高于回答的数量有关所选定义的更多信息，请参见附录A到C。其他信息资金数据收集由中佛罗里达大学刑事司法部门提供的内部资金支持。作者简介sara L. Bryson博士是东卡罗莱纳大学刑事司法和犯罪学系的助理教授。她的研究主要集中在青少年司法系统内的决策，青少年犯罪和欺凌受害者。她最近的研究发表在《青少年暴力与少年司法》、《人际暴力杂志》和《犯罪与司法杂志》上。Erica R. FisselErica R. Fissel博士是中佛罗里达大学刑事司法系的助理教授，与暴力侵害妇女研究集群有次要联系。她目前的主要研究兴趣集中在网络空间中发生的人际伤害，包括网络跟踪、亲密伴侣网络虐待和网络欺凌。她的研究探讨了受害和犯罪之间的关系，受害后的经历(例如，报告和寻求帮助的行为;受害者的后果)，以及公众对基于网络的虐待形式的看法。
{"title":"Is It (Cyber)bullying? Assessing Adult Perceptions of Bullying and Cyberbullying Using a Mixed-Methods Approach","authors":"Sara L. Bryson, Erica R. Fissel","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2270125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2270125","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDespite decades of research on bullying and the influx of studies examining cyberbullying, there is no universal definition for either term. The lack of clarity in defining these terms may impact individuals’ ability to identify (cyber)bullying. Most prior research on bullying and cyberbullying has surveyed school children, their peers, and teachers about their experiences. However, much less research has examined if members of the general public can identify bullying and cyberbullying outside of the school setting. Therefore, the overall objective of the current study is to investigate adults’ ability to identify bullying and cyberbullying and examine the rationale for why respondents identified – or not – instances of verbal, physical, and cyberbullying. Data were collected from 652 adults aged 18 to 50 years old who were residing in the United States. Results suggest that most respondents identified each scenario as (cyber)bullying, however, the rationale behind their decisions varied. Seven themes were identified (e.g. repetition, power imbalance) as both reasons participants identified a situation as a form of bullying, along with reasons why they did not believe a situation was a form of bullying. Implications for policy, practice, and research are provided. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe University of Central Florida provided Institutional Review Board Approval.Consent to participateThe University of Central Florida Institutional Review Board determined the study met the criteria for Exemption. As such, respondents were provided with an Explanation of Research Page and written consent was waived.Notes1 Some respondents chose not to answer this question and others did not answer the prompt provided (i.e., gave nonsensical responses).2 Many responses were coded with multiple themes, thus, the total number of codes were higher than the number of responses.3 See Appendices A through C for more information related to the selected definitions.Additional informationFundingData collection was supported by internal funding provided by the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Central Florida.Notes on contributorsSara L. BrysonSara L. Bryson, PhD, is an assistant professor in the Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology at East Carolina University. Her research focuses on decision-making within the juvenile justice system, juvenile delinquency, and bullying victimization. Her most recent research appears in Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, and the Journal of Crime and Justice.Erica R. FisselErica R. Fissel, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Central Florida, with a secondary affiliation with Violence Against Women Research Cluster. Her primary research interests currently focus on interpersonal victimization that occurs in cyberspace, including cyberstalki","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135780277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-19DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2271628
Mallory A. McCord, Jie Yu
ABSTRACTDrawing on conservation of resources theory, the purpose of this study was to further our understanding of the relationship between abusive supervision and burnout by examining two variables that likely exacerbate this relationship. Susceptibility to stress (i.e. subordinate’s neuroticism) and exposure to a stressor (i.e. time spent with the abusive supervisor) were hypothesized to magnify the positive relationship between abusive supervision and burnout. Data collected from two samples confirmed the positive relationship between abusive supervision and burnout. However, this relationship appears to be unaffected by the employee’s neuroticism nor time spent with their supervisor. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. AcknowledgementThis project is based on the master’s thesis of Jie Yu.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Ethics approvalThis research was deemed exempt by the IRBs of the University of Central Florida (Sample 1) and the University of Minnesota Duluth (Sample 2).Data availability statementThe data is available upon request from the first author.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Minnesota Duluth’s Chancellor’s Faculty Small Grants Program. The sponsor played no role beyond financial support.Notes on contributorsMallory A. McCordMallory A. McCord is an assistant professor in the Psychology Department at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, VA, USA. She received her PhD in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the University of Central Florida. Her research interests focus on workplace mistreatment and stressors.Jie YuJie Yu is a graduate of the Master of Arts in Psychological Science program at the University of Minnesota, Duluth with a focus on Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include workplace stressors and health.
摘要本研究以资源守恒理论为基础，通过考察两个可能加剧滥用监管与倦怠关系的变量，进一步了解滥用监管与倦怠之间的关系。假设对压力的易感性(即下属的神经质)和暴露于压力源(即与虐待主管在一起的时间)可以放大虐待监督与倦怠之间的正相关关系。从两个样本中收集的数据证实了虐待监管与倦怠之间的正相关关系。然而，这种关系似乎不受员工的神经质和与上司相处的时间的影响。讨论了影响、限制和未来的发展方向。这个项目是基于Jie Yu的硕士论文。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。伦理批准本研究被中佛罗里达大学(样本1)和明尼苏达大学德卢斯分校(样本2)的伦理审查委员会视为豁免。数据可用性声明应第一作者的要求提供数据。这项工作得到了明尼苏达大学德卢斯分校校长教师小额资助计划的支持。赞助商除了提供资金支持外，没有发挥任何作用。作者简介:ory A. McCord，美国弗吉尼亚州诺福克Old Dominion大学心理学系助理教授。她在中佛罗里达大学获得工业/组织心理学博士学位。她的研究兴趣集中在工作场所虐待和压力源。Jie Yu毕业于明尼苏达大学德卢斯分校，主修工业/组织心理学。她的研究兴趣包括工作压力源和健康。
{"title":"Abusive Supervision and Burnout: Investigating the Impact of Susceptibility and Exposure to a Stressor","authors":"Mallory A. McCord, Jie Yu","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2271628","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2271628","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDrawing on conservation of resources theory, the purpose of this study was to further our understanding of the relationship between abusive supervision and burnout by examining two variables that likely exacerbate this relationship. Susceptibility to stress (i.e. subordinate’s neuroticism) and exposure to a stressor (i.e. time spent with the abusive supervisor) were hypothesized to magnify the positive relationship between abusive supervision and burnout. Data collected from two samples confirmed the positive relationship between abusive supervision and burnout. However, this relationship appears to be unaffected by the employee’s neuroticism nor time spent with their supervisor. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. AcknowledgementThis project is based on the master’s thesis of Jie Yu.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Ethics approvalThis research was deemed exempt by the IRBs of the University of Central Florida (Sample 1) and the University of Minnesota Duluth (Sample 2).Data availability statementThe data is available upon request from the first author.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Minnesota Duluth’s Chancellor’s Faculty Small Grants Program. The sponsor played no role beyond financial support.Notes on contributorsMallory A. McCordMallory A. McCord is an assistant professor in the Psychology Department at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, VA, USA. She received her PhD in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the University of Central Florida. Her research interests focus on workplace mistreatment and stressors.Jie YuJie Yu is a graduate of the Master of Arts in Psychological Science program at the University of Minnesota, Duluth with a focus on Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include workplace stressors and health.","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135780248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-17DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2271117
Zhihao Ma, Tzu-Hsuan Liu, Yiwei Xia
ABSTRACTGeneral Strain Theory (GST) was applied to understand the emergence of cyberbullying during the COVID-19 lockdown. However, how contextual stress and network attributes contributed to cyberbullying perpetration has yet to be explored. Thus, to fill this gap in the literature, this study surveyed 494 young adults from one college of a university in China during the COVID-19 lockdown. The contextual stress was measured by the average stress reported by each individual’s self-nominated peer. Logit regression with interactive terms was conducted to investigate whether network attributes moderate the stress-cyberbullying nexus. The results revealed that cyberbullying perpetration was directly triggered by individual stress rather than contextual stress. Further, young adults with increased individual stress had a higher probability of cyberbullying perpetration, if their betweenness was high. Notably, for those with elevated betweenness, the association between contextual stress and cyberbullying perpetration was attenuated. Our findings provide novel insights into understanding cyberbullying phenomenon during the pandemic. Roles of individual stress and contextual stress on trigging cyberbully perpetration varied with one’s network position. Both the network analysis and the GST theory had significant potential to be applied in further cyberbullying studies. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2271117Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the Project of Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 21XWC010) and Jiangsu University Philosophy and Social Science Foundation Project (Grant No. 2020SJA0008)Notes on contributorsZhihao MaZhihao Ma is an Assistant Professor at Computational Communication Collaboratory, School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing University. His research interests include new media and health communication, psychological network methodology, and psychometrics.Tzu-Hsuan LiuTzu-Hsuan Liu is an Associate Professor at the School of Political Science and Public Administration, Huaqiao University. Her research interests include Criminology, criminal justice, and mental health.Yiwei XiaYiwei Xia is an Associate Professor at the School of Law, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics. His research interests include quantitative methods, criminology, criminal justice, and social demography.
{"title":"Individual Stress, Contextual Stress, and Network Attributes on Cyberbullying Perpetration Among Young Adults During the COVID-19 Lockdown","authors":"Zhihao Ma, Tzu-Hsuan Liu, Yiwei Xia","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2271117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2271117","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTGeneral Strain Theory (GST) was applied to understand the emergence of cyberbullying during the COVID-19 lockdown. However, how contextual stress and network attributes contributed to cyberbullying perpetration has yet to be explored. Thus, to fill this gap in the literature, this study surveyed 494 young adults from one college of a university in China during the COVID-19 lockdown. The contextual stress was measured by the average stress reported by each individual’s self-nominated peer. Logit regression with interactive terms was conducted to investigate whether network attributes moderate the stress-cyberbullying nexus. The results revealed that cyberbullying perpetration was directly triggered by individual stress rather than contextual stress. Further, young adults with increased individual stress had a higher probability of cyberbullying perpetration, if their betweenness was high. Notably, for those with elevated betweenness, the association between contextual stress and cyberbullying perpetration was attenuated. Our findings provide novel insights into understanding cyberbullying phenomenon during the pandemic. Roles of individual stress and contextual stress on trigging cyberbully perpetration varied with one’s network position. Both the network analysis and the GST theory had significant potential to be applied in further cyberbullying studies. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2271117Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the Project of Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 21XWC010) and Jiangsu University Philosophy and Social Science Foundation Project (Grant No. 2020SJA0008)Notes on contributorsZhihao MaZhihao Ma is an Assistant Professor at Computational Communication Collaboratory, School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing University. His research interests include new media and health communication, psychological network methodology, and psychometrics.Tzu-Hsuan LiuTzu-Hsuan Liu is an Associate Professor at the School of Political Science and Public Administration, Huaqiao University. Her research interests include Criminology, criminal justice, and mental health.Yiwei XiaYiwei Xia is an Associate Professor at the School of Law, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics. His research interests include quantitative methods, criminology, criminal justice, and social demography.","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136034053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-17DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2271115
Zihao Zhou
Using multiple methods and qualitative research design (including analysis of online dating profiles, digital ethnography, and in-depth interviews), I examine the discriminatory nature and mechanism of youzhi (優質), a neoliberal discourse widespread on the Chinese gay dating platform “Blued.” This paper also explores how users interpret the connotations of youzhi and utilize it while justifying and normalizing the usage. My findings consider that the discourse of youzhi can integrate a variety of human qualities and generate a hierarchy with establishing an image of first-class citizens in the Chinese gay community. Specifically on Blued, the connotation of youzhi has been reframed into a one-sided, superficial variant through the site’s pre-configurated attributes and marketing promotions. This underlines the sexual and erotic capital with physical aspects of gay hegemonic masculinity as the currency. Given its discriminatory essence, which could risk the user’s desirability, youzhi is still widely utilized on Blued to deter the ones lacking sexual capital from contacting, promote the user’s image, and attract the ones who meet the stringent beauty standards. Based on my findings, the users rationalize and normalize these actions as solely following the logic of how Blued is configured and what it has constantly promoted.
{"title":"“Don’t Bother Me Unless You are Good-Quality!” <i>- Youzhi</i> (優質) (Good-Quality) Discourse on Gay Dating Platform in China","authors":"Zihao Zhou","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2271115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2271115","url":null,"abstract":"Using multiple methods and qualitative research design (including analysis of online dating profiles, digital ethnography, and in-depth interviews), I examine the discriminatory nature and mechanism of youzhi (優質), a neoliberal discourse widespread on the Chinese gay dating platform “Blued.” This paper also explores how users interpret the connotations of youzhi and utilize it while justifying and normalizing the usage. My findings consider that the discourse of youzhi can integrate a variety of human qualities and generate a hierarchy with establishing an image of first-class citizens in the Chinese gay community. Specifically on Blued, the connotation of youzhi has been reframed into a one-sided, superficial variant through the site’s pre-configurated attributes and marketing promotions. This underlines the sexual and erotic capital with physical aspects of gay hegemonic masculinity as the currency. Given its discriminatory essence, which could risk the user’s desirability, youzhi is still widely utilized on Blued to deter the ones lacking sexual capital from contacting, promote the user’s image, and attract the ones who meet the stringent beauty standards. Based on my findings, the users rationalize and normalize these actions as solely following the logic of how Blued is configured and what it has constantly promoted.","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136033715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-17DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2267727
Jessie Slepicka
ABSTRACTEnvironmental hazards such as air pollutants have increasingly been investigated as macro-level correlates of violent criminal activity, including rates of homicide across space. Such efforts highlight the growing appreciation in the social sciences of the interaction between humans and the natural environment, particularly within the subfields of environmental sociology and green criminology. However, while such investigations broaden the scope of relevant social scientific inquiry, they often fail to appreciate the theoretical and methodological contributions from prior crime and deviance scholars. Given the expansive history within the social sciences of investigating structural covariates of homicide rates, this effort seeks to determine whether differential levels of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) can be observed as unique predictor of lethal violence in the US after simplifying the dimensionality of the regressor space. Results indicate that while air pollution levels share covariate space with population size and density, their combined influence represents a robust predictor of county-level homicide rates in the various spatial econometric models estimated. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Broadly conceived, green behaviorism is a branch of green criminology that seeks to empirically examine the relationship between exposure to chemical pollutants and criminal behavior, given the vast collection of medical and epidemiological evidence linking such exposure to behavioral changes that generate increased levels of aggression and/or anxiety. Borrowing from psychological/radical behaviorism, which holds not only that human behavior is driven solely by responses to external stimuli, but that no reference needs to be made to psychological processes or mental states, Lynch and Stretsky (Citation2014) argued that crime as a measurable behavioral response could be explained by way of the effect of environmental toxins on a subject’s physiology or physiological state. The green behaviorism position, according to the researchers, is theoretically and empirically useful for social scientists when analyzing the factors that generate criminal behavior and affect its distribution within the environment and/or population. While the current manuscript is engaged in the environmental hazard-homicide relationship at a more methodological level, attention will be given at the end of the work to theoretical explanations, much like Lynch and Stretsky’s “green behaviorism” position, for why an ecological relationship between air pollution and homicide may exist.2 Throughout this article, for the sake of parsimony, the term “air pollution” is considered synonymous, and used interchangeably, with particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5). However, it should be noted that prior air pollution-crime investigations have focused on a
{"title":"Environmental Hazards and Structural Covariates of US Homicide Rates: Methodological Considerations When Investigating the “Ecology” of Violence","authors":"Jessie Slepicka","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2267727","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2267727","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTEnvironmental hazards such as air pollutants have increasingly been investigated as macro-level correlates of violent criminal activity, including rates of homicide across space. Such efforts highlight the growing appreciation in the social sciences of the interaction between humans and the natural environment, particularly within the subfields of environmental sociology and green criminology. However, while such investigations broaden the scope of relevant social scientific inquiry, they often fail to appreciate the theoretical and methodological contributions from prior crime and deviance scholars. Given the expansive history within the social sciences of investigating structural covariates of homicide rates, this effort seeks to determine whether differential levels of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) can be observed as unique predictor of lethal violence in the US after simplifying the dimensionality of the regressor space. Results indicate that while air pollution levels share covariate space with population size and density, their combined influence represents a robust predictor of county-level homicide rates in the various spatial econometric models estimated. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Broadly conceived, green behaviorism is a branch of green criminology that seeks to empirically examine the relationship between exposure to chemical pollutants and criminal behavior, given the vast collection of medical and epidemiological evidence linking such exposure to behavioral changes that generate increased levels of aggression and/or anxiety. Borrowing from psychological/radical behaviorism, which holds not only that human behavior is driven solely by responses to external stimuli, but that no reference needs to be made to psychological processes or mental states, Lynch and Stretsky (Citation2014) argued that crime as a measurable behavioral response could be explained by way of the effect of environmental toxins on a subject’s physiology or physiological state. The green behaviorism position, according to the researchers, is theoretically and empirically useful for social scientists when analyzing the factors that generate criminal behavior and affect its distribution within the environment and/or population. While the current manuscript is engaged in the environmental hazard-homicide relationship at a more methodological level, attention will be given at the end of the work to theoretical explanations, much like Lynch and Stretsky’s “green behaviorism” position, for why an ecological relationship between air pollution and homicide may exist.2 Throughout this article, for the sake of parsimony, the term “air pollution” is considered synonymous, and used interchangeably, with particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5). However, it should be noted that prior air pollution-crime investigations have focused on a","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136034779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2268253
Ruxandra Mihaela Gheorghe, David Yuzva Clement
ABSTRACTMuch attention has been paid to incel communities in recent years. Comprised of involuntary celibate individuals who are dissatisfied with their shared experiences of romantic and sexual rejection, incels blame women and the societal rejection of hegemonic masculinity as the cause of their grievances. Current scholarship has produced conflicting results regarding the prevalence of autism within incel communities when compared to the general population. At the same time, no research to date has explored the intersection of incels and autism using perspectives from individuals in the incel community. Using a critical autism lens, this present study thematically analyzes 20 online incel message boards to explore the sense-making of self-identified autistic incels. Findings indicate that incels’ internalized ableism of autism is employed to categorically justify the victimhood and entitlement that grounds their ideology. This weaponization of autism is then used to promote ableism and networked misogyny. Implications for understanding ableist and misogynistic beliefs associated with inceldom are provided. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This research uses identity-first terminology in line with autistic advocates’ recommendations to emphasize that autism is an inherent part of one’s identity (Taboas et al. Citation2023).Additional informationFundingThe authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.Notes on contributorsRuxandra Mihaela GheorgheRuxandra M. Gheorghe, MA, MSW, is a social worker and doctoral candidate at Carleton University’s School of Social Work in Canada. Her current research is concerned with articulations of toxic masculinity in direct therapeutic practice.David Yuzva ClementDavid Yuzva Clement, PhD, is an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University’s School of Social Work in Canada. He is also an Associate Fellow at the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT).
【摘要】近年来，社区教育受到了广泛的关注。这些非自愿的独身主义者对他们共同的浪漫和性拒绝的经历感到不满，他们指责女性和社会对霸道的男性气概的拒绝是他们不满的原因。目前的学术研究已经产生了相互矛盾的结果，关于自闭症在incel社区的患病率与一般人群相比。与此同时，迄今为止还没有研究从细胞群体的个人角度探索细胞和自闭症的交集。本研究使用关键的自闭症镜头，对20个在线细胞留言板进行主题分析，以探索自我认定的自闭症细胞的意义构建。研究结果表明，细胞对自闭症的内化残疾歧视被用来明确地证明受害者身份和权利是他们意识形态的基础。这种对自闭症的武器化随后被用来促进残疾歧视和网络化的厌女症。提供了理解残疾主义和厌女主义信仰的含义。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1本研究根据自闭症倡导者的建议，使用了身份优先的术语，以强调自闭症是一个人身份的固有部分(Taboas等)。Citation2023)。作者没有获得研究、写作和/或发表这篇文章的经济支持。ruxandra M. Gheorghe，文学硕士，城市生活垃圾，加拿大卡尔顿大学社会工作学院的一名社会工作者和博士生。她目前的研究关注的是直接治疗实践中有毒男子气概的表达。David Yuzva Clement，博士，加拿大卡尔顿大学社会工作学院兼职研究教授。他也是国际反恐中心(ICCT)副研究员。
{"title":"Weaponized Autism: Making Sense of Violent Internalized Ableism in Online Incel Communities","authors":"Ruxandra Mihaela Gheorghe, David Yuzva Clement","doi":"10.1080/01639625.2023.2268253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2268253","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMuch attention has been paid to incel communities in recent years. Comprised of involuntary celibate individuals who are dissatisfied with their shared experiences of romantic and sexual rejection, incels blame women and the societal rejection of hegemonic masculinity as the cause of their grievances. Current scholarship has produced conflicting results regarding the prevalence of autism within incel communities when compared to the general population. At the same time, no research to date has explored the intersection of incels and autism using perspectives from individuals in the incel community. Using a critical autism lens, this present study thematically analyzes 20 online incel message boards to explore the sense-making of self-identified autistic incels. Findings indicate that incels’ internalized ableism of autism is employed to categorically justify the victimhood and entitlement that grounds their ideology. This weaponization of autism is then used to promote ableism and networked misogyny. Implications for understanding ableist and misogynistic beliefs associated with inceldom are provided. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This research uses identity-first terminology in line with autistic advocates’ recommendations to emphasize that autism is an inherent part of one’s identity (Taboas et al. Citation2023).Additional informationFundingThe authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.Notes on contributorsRuxandra Mihaela GheorgheRuxandra M. Gheorghe, MA, MSW, is a social worker and doctoral candidate at Carleton University’s School of Social Work in Canada. Her current research is concerned with articulations of toxic masculinity in direct therapeutic practice.David Yuzva ClementDavid Yuzva Clement, PhD, is an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University’s School of Social Work in Canada. He is also an Associate Fellow at the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT).","PeriodicalId":48000,"journal":{"name":"Deviant Behavior","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136112869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：