Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1037/xap0000542
Timothy J Pleskac, Joseph Cesario, David J Johnson, Glen Gagnon
We used an immersive shooting simulator to examine how race, suspect behavior, and policing scenario shape officers' deadly force decisions. Officers (N = 659) from the Milwaukee Police Department responded to dynamic video scenarios using realistic handgun responses. Mistaken shootings of unarmed Black suspects were more likely than of White suspects, but only when the suspects behaved nonantagonistically. Cognitive modeling showed this race effect arose not from an initial bias to shoot but from differences in evidence accumulation once the object was visible. Scenario and suspect behavior had the largest overall influence, shaping decisions by altering initial proclivity to shoot. Further analysis suggested that suspect behavior within specific scenarios may partially explain observed race effects. These findings provide a process-level account of deadly force decisions, integrating real-world complexity with psychological theory, and offer a framework for improving research and training around police use-of-force. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
我们使用了一个沉浸式射击模拟器来研究种族、嫌疑人行为和警务场景如何影响警察的致命武力决定。来自密尔沃基警察局的警官(N = 659)使用真实的手枪反应对动态视频场景做出反应。手无寸铁的黑人嫌疑人比白人嫌疑人更容易被误射,但前提是嫌疑人的行为没有敌意。认知模型显示,这种种族效应不是来自最初的射击偏好,而是来自物体可见后证据积累的差异。情境和嫌疑人行为的总体影响最大,通过改变最初的射击倾向来塑造决策。进一步的分析表明,在特定情况下的可疑行为可能部分解释了观察到的种族效应。这些发现为致命武力决策提供了一个过程层面的解释,将现实世界的复杂性与心理学理论相结合,并为改善警察使用武力的研究和培训提供了一个框架。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Modeling police officers' deadly force decisions in an immersive shooting simulator.","authors":"Timothy J Pleskac, Joseph Cesario, David J Johnson, Glen Gagnon","doi":"10.1037/xap0000542","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000542","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We used an immersive shooting simulator to examine how race, suspect behavior, and policing scenario shape officers' deadly force decisions. Officers (<i>N</i> = 659) from the Milwaukee Police Department responded to dynamic video scenarios using realistic handgun responses. Mistaken shootings of unarmed Black suspects were more likely than of White suspects, but only when the suspects behaved nonantagonistically. Cognitive modeling showed this race effect arose not from an initial bias to shoot but from differences in evidence accumulation once the object was visible. Scenario and suspect behavior had the largest overall influence, shaping decisions by altering initial proclivity to shoot. Further analysis suggested that suspect behavior within specific scenarios may partially explain observed race effects. These findings provide a process-level account of deadly force decisions, integrating real-world complexity with psychological theory, and offer a framework for improving research and training around police use-of-force. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":"297-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.1037/xap0000541
Samuel Pratt, Payton J Jones, Victoria M E Bridgland, Benjamin W Bellet, Richard J McNally
Trigger warnings and safe space notifications are common in higher education. Although researchers have evaluated these practices as mental health tools, little attention has been paid to the interpersonal signals they send. In this experiment conducted in fall 2024, we examined how trigger warnings and safe space notifications shape students' perceptions of instructors and the classroom environment. We randomly assigned 738 American undergraduate students to view videos of instructors delivering a brief lecture on trauma, preceded by the instructor providing a trigger warning, a safe space notification, both, or neither. Participants rated the instructor's epistemic trustworthiness, concern for student well-being, political orientation, and Left-Wing Authoritarianism scale, as well as their own feelings of psychological safety and willingness to discuss controversial topics in the classroom. Analyses using Bayes Factors provided substantial evidence that trigger warnings had no overall impact on students' perceptions. In contrast, safe space notifications increased students' feelings of psychological safety and willingness to discuss controversial topics. Safe spaces also increased perceptions of instructors as caring and trustworthy but signaled that instructors were liberal and left-wing authoritarian, including the subscale measuring support for top-down censorship. Implications for the use of trigger warnings and safe spaces in educational contexts are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
触发警告和安全空间通知在高等教育中很常见。尽管研究人员已经将这些练习作为心理健康工具进行了评估,但很少有人关注它们发出的人际信号。在2024年秋季进行的这项实验中,我们研究了触发警告和安全空间通知如何影响学生对教师和课堂环境的看法。我们随机分配了738名美国本科生,让他们观看教师关于创伤的简短讲座的视频,在讲座之前,教师会提供触发警告、安全空间通知,或者两者都提供,或者两者都不提供。参与者对教师的认知可信度、对学生福祉的关注、政治取向、左翼威权主义量表、以及他们自己的心理安全感和在课堂上讨论有争议话题的意愿进行了打分。使用贝叶斯因子的分析提供了大量证据,表明触发警告对学生的认知没有总体影响。相比之下,安全空间通知增加了学生的心理安全感和讨论有争议话题的意愿。安全空间也增加了人们对教师的关怀和值得信赖的看法,但也表明教师是自由派和左翼威权主义者,包括衡量对自上而下审查的支持程度的子量表。讨论了在教育环境中使用触发警告和安全空间的含义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Sending signals: Trigger warnings and safe space notifications.","authors":"Samuel Pratt, Payton J Jones, Victoria M E Bridgland, Benjamin W Bellet, Richard J McNally","doi":"10.1037/xap0000541","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000541","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trigger warnings and safe space notifications are common in higher education. Although researchers have evaluated these practices as mental health tools, little attention has been paid to the interpersonal signals they send. In this experiment conducted in fall 2024, we examined how trigger warnings and safe space notifications shape students' perceptions of instructors and the classroom environment. We randomly assigned 738 American undergraduate students to view videos of instructors delivering a brief lecture on trauma, preceded by the instructor providing a trigger warning, a safe space notification, both, or neither. Participants rated the instructor's epistemic trustworthiness, concern for student well-being, political orientation, and Left-Wing Authoritarianism scale, as well as their own feelings of psychological safety and willingness to discuss controversial topics in the classroom. Analyses using Bayes Factors provided substantial evidence that trigger warnings had no overall impact on students' perceptions. In contrast, safe space notifications increased students' feelings of psychological safety and willingness to discuss controversial topics. Safe spaces also increased perceptions of instructors as caring and trustworthy but signaled that instructors were liberal and left-wing authoritarian, including the subscale measuring support for top-down censorship. Implications for the use of trigger warnings and safe spaces in educational contexts are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":"229-242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144561547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caroline Heydenbluth, Hillie Aaldering, Hong Zhang, Johann M Majer, Roman Trötschel
Managing limited natural resources is an important sustainability challenge, requiring efficient conflict resolution among parties in a dynamically changing environment. To address these challenges, humans have developed sequential negotiations-adaptive joint decision-making processes enabling efficient, forward-looking agreements that consider all parties' priorities and the changing value of resources over time. Across three incentivized, face-to-face negotiation experiments (N = 330), we systematically investigate when and why negotiation dyads succeed or fail in reaching efficient agreements in sequential allocation negotiations, thereby leveraging the changing value of resources. Because trust may be an important psychological factor in reaching efficient agreements in such sequential negotiations, we manipulated trust levels (high vs. low) between negotiating pairs and progressively increased its relevance across experiments. Across both distribution (Experiments 1 and 2) and contribution negotiations (Experiment 3) and regardless of trust, dyads consistently prioritized resolving immediate conflicts of interest during the initial negotiation, failing to leverage changes in resource values and limiting their ability to reach efficient agreements over time. Integrating elements from environmental, social, and negotiation psychology, this research highlights challenges in sequential negotiations with dynamic resource values and provides a basis for evidence-based interventions to enhance agreement efficiency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
管理有限的自然资源是一项重要的可持续性挑战,需要在动态变化的环境中有效解决各方之间的冲突。为了应对这些挑战,人类已经开发出了顺序谈判——自适应的联合决策过程,实现了有效的、前瞻性的协议,这些协议考虑了各方的优先事项和随时间变化的资源价值。通过三个激励的面对面谈判实验(N = 330),我们系统地研究了谈判双方在顺序分配谈判中何时以及为何成功或失败达成有效协议,从而利用不断变化的资源价值。由于信任可能是在这种顺序谈判中达成有效协议的重要心理因素,我们操纵谈判对之间的信任水平(高与低),并在实验中逐步增加其相关性。在分配(实验1和2)和贡献谈判(实验3)中,不考虑信任,在最初的谈判中,双方始终优先解决直接的利益冲突,未能利用资源价值的变化,并限制了他们随着时间的推移达成有效协议的能力。本研究整合了环境、社会和谈判心理学的要素,突出了动态资源价值下序贯谈判的挑战,为循证干预提高协议效率提供了基础。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"How do negotiators resolve conflict over resources of changing value: The role of trust in sequential negotiations.","authors":"Caroline Heydenbluth, Hillie Aaldering, Hong Zhang, Johann M Majer, Roman Trötschel","doi":"10.1037/xap0000555","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managing limited natural resources is an important sustainability challenge, requiring efficient conflict resolution among parties in a dynamically changing environment. To address these challenges, humans have developed sequential negotiations-adaptive joint decision-making processes enabling efficient, forward-looking agreements that consider all parties' priorities and the changing value of resources over time. Across three incentivized, face-to-face negotiation experiments (<i>N</i> = 330), we systematically investigate when and why negotiation dyads succeed or fail in reaching efficient agreements in sequential allocation negotiations, thereby leveraging the changing value of resources. Because trust may be an important psychological factor in reaching efficient agreements in such sequential negotiations, we manipulated trust levels (high vs. low) between negotiating pairs and progressively increased its relevance across experiments. Across both distribution (Experiments 1 and 2) and contribution negotiations (Experiment 3) and regardless of trust, dyads consistently prioritized resolving immediate conflicts of interest during the initial negotiation, failing to leverage changes in resource values and limiting their ability to reach efficient agreements over time. Integrating elements from environmental, social, and negotiation psychology, this research highlights challenges in sequential negotiations with dynamic resource values and provides a basis for evidence-based interventions to enhance agreement efficiency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-05DOI: 10.1037/xap0000534
Kalypso Iordanou, Deanna Kuhn
Over several weeks, 125 young adolescents engaged deeply with the topic of climate change in a discourse-based program designed to build argumentation skills. We put to a test the hypothesis that information on this complex and critical topic is best acquired and made use of in argument if acquiring it is experienced as having purpose and able to fulfill a role in argument. Activities in an experimental condition followed the program's practice of making available topic-related information in the form of brief questions and answers on an as-requested basis. Offered to them as a potential resource in peer dialogs on the topic, throughout the activity participants selected questions they wished answers to, and these were provided. Students in a comparison condition followed the traditional classroom practice of being assigned to read an introductory text as background information on the topic. It contained information identical to that in the questions and answer cards experimental group participants chose to access. Under both conditions, all information remained available once accessed. Both groups benefited in knowledge gain, as well as skill development in coordinating evidence with claims in final essays. However, the experimental group showed greater knowledge as well as skill gain, and a difference we suggest is attributable to the knowledge gained having an anticipated purpose making them more likely to make use of it. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在几个星期的时间里,125名青少年在一个旨在培养辩论技巧的以话语为基础的项目中深入探讨了气候变化这个话题。我们对这个假设进行了测试,即如果获得的信息是有目的的,并且能够在论证中发挥作用,那么关于这个复杂而关键的主题的信息最好是获得的,并在论证中得到利用。实验条件下的活动遵循了该计划的惯例,即根据要求以简短的问题和答案的形式提供与主题相关的信息。在整个活动中,参与者选择他们希望回答的问题,并提供给他们作为关于该主题的同伴对话的潜在资源。比较组的学生遵循传统的课堂实践,被要求阅读一篇介绍性文章作为主题的背景信息。它包含的信息与实验组参与者选择访问的问题和答案卡中的信息相同。在这两种情况下,所有信息在被访问后仍然可用。两组学生都受益于知识的获得,以及在最终论文中协调证据和观点的技能的发展。然而,实验组表现出更多的知识和技能收获,我们认为这种差异是由于获得的知识有一个预期的目的,使他们更有可能利用它。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Investigating climate change through argumentation: Purposeful questioning supports argumentation and knowledge acquisition.","authors":"Kalypso Iordanou, Deanna Kuhn","doi":"10.1037/xap0000534","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000534","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over several weeks, 125 young adolescents engaged deeply with the topic of climate change in a discourse-based program designed to build argumentation skills. We put to a test the hypothesis that information on this complex and critical topic is best acquired and made use of in argument if acquiring it is experienced as having purpose and able to fulfill a role in argument. Activities in an experimental condition followed the program's practice of making available topic-related information in the form of brief questions and answers on an as-requested basis. Offered to them as a potential resource in peer dialogs on the topic, throughout the activity participants selected questions they wished answers to, and these were provided. Students in a comparison condition followed the traditional classroom practice of being assigned to read an introductory text as background information on the topic. It contained information identical to that in the questions and answer cards experimental group participants chose to access. Under both conditions, all information remained available once accessed. Both groups benefited in knowledge gain, as well as skill development in coordinating evidence with claims in final essays. However, the experimental group showed greater knowledge as well as skill gain, and a difference we suggest is attributable to the knowledge gained having an anticipated purpose making them more likely to make use of it. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":"276-285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143992385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-21DOI: 10.1037/xap0000536
Wansu Zhu, Emma Holmes
Understanding speech in noisy environments is often challenging but is easier if we are listening to someone familiar-for example, naturally familiar people (e.g., friends, partners) or voices that have been familiarized artificially in the lab. Thus, familiarizing people with voices they regularly encounter (e.g., new friends and colleagues) could improve speech intelligibility in everyday life, which might be particularly useful for people who struggle to comprehend speech in noisy environments, such as older adults. Yet, we do not currently understand whether computer-based voice familiarization is effective when delivered remotely, outside of a lab setting, and whether it is effective for older adults. Here, in an online computer-based study, we examined whether learned voices are more intelligible than unfamiliar voices in 20 older (55-73 years) and 20 younger (18-34 years) adults. Overall, older and younger participants benefited from training, and the magnitude of the intelligibility benefit (approximately 10% improvement in sentence report when the target-to-masker ratio was -6 dB) was similar between groups. These findings demonstrate that older adults can learn new voices as effectively as younger participants for improving speech intelligibility, even given a relatively short (< 1 hr) duration of familiarization that is delivered in the comfort of their own homes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在嘈杂的环境中理解语言通常是具有挑战性的,但如果我们听的是熟悉的人的话,比如,自然熟悉的人(如朋友、伙伴)或在实验室里人工熟悉的声音,就容易多了。因此,让人们熟悉他们经常遇到的声音(例如,新朋友和同事)可以提高日常生活中的语音清晰度,这对那些在嘈杂环境中难以理解语音的人(例如老年人)可能特别有用。然而,我们目前还不了解基于计算机的语音熟悉在远程交付时是否有效,在实验室环境之外,以及它是否对老年人有效。这里,在一项基于在线计算机的研究中,我们对20名年龄较大(55-73岁)和20名年龄较小(18-34岁)的成年人进行了研究,以确定习得的声音是否比不熟悉的声音更容易理解。总体而言,老年人和年轻人都从训练中受益,而且两组之间的可理解性获益幅度相似(当目标与掩蔽比为-6 dB时,句子报告提高了约10%)。这些发现表明,在提高语音清晰度方面,老年人可以像年轻人一样有效地学习新声音,即使是在他们自己舒适的家中进行的相对较短的熟悉时间(< 1小时)。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Computer-based voice familiarization, delivered remotely using an online platform, improves speech intelligibility for older and younger adults.","authors":"Wansu Zhu, Emma Holmes","doi":"10.1037/xap0000536","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000536","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding speech in noisy environments is often challenging but is easier if we are listening to someone familiar-for example, naturally familiar people (e.g., friends, partners) or voices that have been familiarized artificially in the lab. Thus, familiarizing people with voices they regularly encounter (e.g., new friends and colleagues) could improve speech intelligibility in everyday life, which might be particularly useful for people who struggle to comprehend speech in noisy environments, such as older adults. Yet, we do not currently understand whether computer-based voice familiarization is effective when delivered remotely, outside of a lab setting, and whether it is effective for older adults. Here, in an online computer-based study, we examined whether learned voices are more intelligible than unfamiliar voices in 20 older (55-73 years) and 20 younger (18-34 years) adults. Overall, older and younger participants benefited from training, and the magnitude of the intelligibility benefit (approximately 10% improvement in sentence report when the target-to-masker ratio was -6 dB) was similar between groups. These findings demonstrate that older adults can learn new voices as effectively as younger participants for improving speech intelligibility, even given a relatively short (< 1 hr) duration of familiarization that is delivered in the comfort of their own homes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":"314-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144676172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-22DOI: 10.1037/xap0000537
Kwanho Suk, Jieun Koo
This research examines biases in judgments about currency exchange rates and presents two types of biases that are caused by ignorance of the nonlinearity between the exchange rate and the amount of base currency. First, the average exchange rate of multiple exchange transactions is overestimated. Second, the impact of a change in one currency's value on the counterpart currency is underestimated, when the change is a decrease but overestimated when the change is an increase. This research also demonstrates that these biases lead individuals to make suboptimal decisions, causing economic losses. Furthermore, this research examines the role of how exchange rate information is presented in reducing bias. Specifically, overestimation of the average exchange rate can be reduced by presenting the exchange rate in terms of the base currency instead of the quote currency. Bias in the judgment of the impact of exchange rate changes diminishes, when the focal currency to be judged is presented as the quote currency of the exchange rate. Last, this research shows that biases in currency exchange rates differ from biases in other types of ratios (e.g., velocity or fuel efficiency) because of the difference in the degree of fungibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究考察了对货币汇率判断的偏差,并提出了两种偏差,这两种偏差是由于忽视汇率与基础货币数量之间的非线性而引起的。第一,多笔汇兑交易的平均汇率被高估。其次,一种货币价值的变化对对应货币的影响被低估了,当变化是减少时,而当变化是增加时,则被高估了。这项研究还表明,这些偏见会导致个人做出次优决策,从而造成经济损失。此外,本研究探讨了汇率信息如何在减少偏见中呈现的作用。具体来说,可以通过以基准货币而不是报价货币表示汇率来减少对平均汇率的高估。当待判断的焦点货币被表示为汇率的报价货币时,判断汇率变化影响的偏差就会减少。最后,这项研究表明,由于可替代性程度的差异,货币汇率的偏差不同于其他类型比率(例如,速度或燃油效率)的偏差。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Currency exchange rate bias.","authors":"Kwanho Suk, Jieun Koo","doi":"10.1037/xap0000537","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000537","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research examines biases in judgments about currency exchange rates and presents two types of biases that are caused by ignorance of the nonlinearity between the exchange rate and the amount of base currency. First, the average exchange rate of multiple exchange transactions is overestimated. Second, the impact of a change in one currency's value on the counterpart currency is underestimated, when the change is a decrease but overestimated when the change is an increase. This research also demonstrates that these biases lead individuals to make suboptimal decisions, causing economic losses. Furthermore, this research examines the role of how exchange rate information is presented in reducing bias. Specifically, overestimation of the average exchange rate can be reduced by presenting the exchange rate in terms of the base currency instead of the quote currency. Bias in the judgment of the impact of exchange rate changes diminishes, when the focal currency to be judged is presented as the quote currency of the exchange rate. Last, this research shows that biases in currency exchange rates differ from biases in other types of ratios (e.g., velocity or fuel efficiency) because of the difference in the degree of fungibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":"260-275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144129157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fernando Munoz Gomez Andrade, Megan L Bartlett, Christopher D Wickens, Jason S McCarley
Diagnostic aids can assist human operators in everyday and high-stakes decision tasks, but performance typically falls short of best possible levels, reflecting a tendency toward disuse. To mitigate disuse, it is important to understand how task context influences aid dependence. The present study tested the prediction that aid use will become less efficient either as the aid becomes more reliable or the decision maker's task becomes more difficult. Participants (N = 127; data collected in 2023) performed a signal detection task with and without support from a diagnostic aid, where task difficulty and aid reliability varied between subjects. Analyses compared observed levels of aided performance with the predictions of an optimal strategy. Aided performance was consistently suboptimal but fell furthest from optimal when the aid was most reliable and when the task was most difficult. Costs of disuse to decision accuracy were substantial. Findings replicate and extend earlier patterns of suboptimal use, indicating that a mechanism of disuse is a failure to increase aid dependence appropriately in response to increases in aid quality or task demand. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
诊断辅助设备可以帮助人类操作员完成日常和高风险的决策任务,但其性能通常达不到最佳水平,反映出被废弃的趋势。为了减少误用,了解任务上下文如何影响援助依赖是很重要的。目前的研究测试了这样一种预测,即随着援助变得更加可靠或决策者的任务变得更加困难,援助的使用将变得更低效。参与者(N = 127;数据收集于2023年)在有和没有诊断辅助的情况下执行信号检测任务,其中任务难度和辅助可靠性因受试者而异。分析将观察到的辅助性能水平与最佳策略的预测进行比较。辅助工具的表现一直是次优的,但当辅助工具最可靠和任务最困难时,它离最优的距离最大。停用对决策准确性的影响是巨大的。研究结果重复并扩展了早期的次优使用模式,表明废弃机制未能适当地增加对援助的依赖,以应对援助质量或任务需求的增加。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Leaving money on the table: As diagnostic aids become more useful, operators use them less efficiently.","authors":"Fernando Munoz Gomez Andrade, Megan L Bartlett, Christopher D Wickens, Jason S McCarley","doi":"10.1037/xap0000549","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000549","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic aids can assist human operators in everyday and high-stakes decision tasks, but performance typically falls short of best possible levels, reflecting a tendency toward disuse. To mitigate disuse, it is important to understand how task context influences aid dependence. The present study tested the prediction that aid use will become less efficient either as the aid becomes more reliable or the decision maker's task becomes more difficult. Participants (<i>N</i> = 127; data collected in 2023) performed a signal detection task with and without support from a diagnostic aid, where task difficulty and aid reliability varied between subjects. Analyses compared observed levels of aided performance with the predictions of an optimal strategy. Aided performance was consistently suboptimal but fell furthest from optimal when the aid was most reliable and when the task was most difficult. Costs of disuse to decision accuracy were substantial. Findings replicate and extend earlier patterns of suboptimal use, indicating that a mechanism of disuse is a failure to increase aid dependence appropriately in response to increases in aid quality or task demand. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145542585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The strategy of presenting students with questions that they mostly cannot answer before they read a text has been shown to improve learning and it is known as prequestions. This prequestion effect has been attributed to focusing of attention as well as to additional benefits of answering attempts. However, in most studies, the control group just reads the text, which limits both theoretical and practical implications. In two preregistered experiments conducted between 2022 and 2024, we included learning objectives as an additional educationally relevant control condition that, like prequestions, should help focus learners' attention, but unlike prequestions, not prompt answering attempts. Participants were presented with open-ended questions or with learning objectives before reading a textbook excerpt or just read the text. In the final test, they answered multiple-choice questions related to the prequestions or learning objectives (old questions) as well as new questions. Bayesian evidence indicates small to medium-sized effects in favor of prequestions compared with reading only and reading with learning objectives in both experiments. Significant differences in frequentist testing were obtained in Experiment 2 and in a joint analysis of both experiments. Overall, the findings indicate that there is indeed a benefit of prequestions over and above focusing of attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
在学生阅读一篇文章之前,向他们提出一些他们大多无法回答的问题,这种策略被证明可以提高他们的学习效果,这就是所谓的预先提问。这种提问前效应归因于注意力的集中以及尝试回答的额外好处。然而,在大多数研究中,对照组只是阅读文本,这限制了理论和实践意义。在2022年至2024年间进行的两次预注册实验中,我们将学习目标作为额外的教育相关控制条件,与预考一样,它应该有助于集中学习者的注意力,但与预考不同的是,它不会提示回答尝试。在阅读教科书节选或只是阅读文本之前,研究人员向参与者提出开放式问题或学习目标。在最后的测试中,他们回答了与预设问题或学习目标(旧问题)相关的多项选择题以及新问题。贝叶斯证据表明,在两个实验中,与纯阅读和有学习目标的阅读相比,预习题的效果较小至中等。在实验2和两个实验的联合分析中获得了频率测试的显着差异。总的来说,研究结果表明,在注意力集中之外,预先提问确实有好处。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Do prequestions support learning from text more than learning objectives?","authors":"Judith Schweppe, Philipp Radloff, Alexander Fenzl","doi":"10.1037/xap0000558","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000558","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The strategy of presenting students with questions that they mostly cannot answer before they read a text has been shown to improve learning and it is known as prequestions. This prequestion effect has been attributed to focusing of attention as well as to additional benefits of answering attempts. However, in most studies, the control group just reads the text, which limits both theoretical and practical implications. In two preregistered experiments conducted between 2022 and 2024, we included learning objectives as an additional educationally relevant control condition that, like prequestions, should help focus learners' attention, but unlike prequestions, not prompt answering attempts. Participants were presented with open-ended questions or with learning objectives before reading a textbook excerpt or just read the text. In the final test, they answered multiple-choice questions related to the prequestions or learning objectives (old questions) as well as new questions. Bayesian evidence indicates small to medium-sized effects in favor of prequestions compared with reading only and reading with learning objectives in both experiments. Significant differences in frequentist testing were obtained in Experiment 2 and in a joint analysis of both experiments. Overall, the findings indicate that there is indeed a benefit of prequestions over and above focusing of attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145543297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
When an eyewitness is presented with multiple lineups, each containing the same suspect but entirely new fillers, this increases the risk that an eyewitness will identify the suspect-whether that suspect is innocent or guilty (called the repeated-suspect effect). There are several mechanisms that can lead to repeated-suspect effects, some based in memory processes and others based in social influence processes. Across two in-person experiments, we examined conditions that might exacerbate the repeated-suspect effect. In Experiment 1 (N = 316, collected in 2019), we showed that a previous lineup that is biased toward the innocent suspect exacerbates the repeated-suspect effect but found no evidence that participants' memory for the true culprit was affected. In Experiment 2 (N = 303, collected in 2020), additional intervening lineups increased the risk to innocent suspects. Experiment 2 also highlighted the role of social influence in eyewitness errors. We found that the physical presence of the experimenter during the task influenced their choice to identify the repeated person, especially after a biased lineup. Thus, we show evidence for the role of memory and social influence mechanisms in repeated-suspect effects as well as dramatic increases in the risk to innocent suspects when intervening lineup procedures make the suspect more salient to the viewer. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Biased lineups and additional repetitions exacerbate the repeated-suspect effect.","authors":"Adele Quigley-McBride, Gary L Wells","doi":"10.1037/xap0000553","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000553","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When an eyewitness is presented with multiple lineups, each containing the same suspect but entirely new fillers, this increases the risk that an eyewitness will identify the suspect-whether that suspect is innocent or guilty (called the repeated-suspect effect). There are several mechanisms that can lead to repeated-suspect effects, some based in memory processes and others based in social influence processes. Across two in-person experiments, we examined conditions that might exacerbate the repeated-suspect effect. In Experiment 1 (<i>N</i> = 316, collected in 2019), we showed that a previous lineup that is biased toward the innocent suspect exacerbates the repeated-suspect effect but found no evidence that participants' memory for the true culprit was affected. In Experiment 2 (<i>N</i> = 303, collected in 2020), additional intervening lineups increased the risk to innocent suspects. Experiment 2 also highlighted the role of social influence in eyewitness errors. We found that the physical presence of the experimenter during the task influenced their choice to identify the repeated person, especially after a biased lineup. Thus, we show evidence for the role of memory and social influence mechanisms in repeated-suspect effects as well as dramatic increases in the risk to innocent suspects when intervening lineup procedures make the suspect more salient to the viewer. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145439614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Katharina A Schwarz, Sarah Meier, Julia Menzel, Ariane Dreier, Roland Pfister
As a global community, humankind stands before a monumental challenge: to change our behavioral habits toward a more sustainable way of life. There are multiple paths toward that challenge, one of which is motivating citizens to engage in more pro-environmental behavior in everyday life. In this series of experiments (N = 521 participants), we pioneer a new paradigm that simulates everyday decision making via narrative-interactive choice elements to evaluate motivating strategies with a specific focus on sense of agency (SoA), that is, perceived control. To this end, we first characterize different individual motivators in fostering pro-environmental behavior. Further, in an experimental approach, we implement prompt variants into the narrative-interactive choice elements paradigm (color coding of choices vs. information on choice consequences) aligned with different aspects of SoA formation to test how SoA might facilitate pro-environmental decisions. Our results demonstrate that increased SoA is associated with pro-environmental behavior and showcase how prompt variants during decision making may affect pro-environmental behavior. Moreover, our results demonstrate a strong association of the participants' attitude toward environmental protection with SoA and pro-environmental behavior. SoA has been identified as a crucial aspect of action motivation; the present study provides compelling evidence that optimizing SoA may provide a much-needed strategy in fostering sustainability behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
作为一个全球社区,人类面临着一个巨大的挑战:改变我们的行为习惯,走向更可持续的生活方式。应对这一挑战有多种途径,其中之一是激励公民在日常生活中采取更环保的行为。在这一系列实验中(N = 521名参与者),我们开创了一个新的范式,通过叙述互动选择元素模拟日常决策,以评估激励策略,特别关注代理感(SoA),即感知控制。为此,我们首先描述了促进亲环境行为的不同个人激励因素。此外,在实验方法中,我们将提示变体实现到叙述交互选择元素范式中(选择的颜色编码与选择结果的信息),并与SoA形成的不同方面保持一致,以测试SoA如何促进亲环境决策。我们的研究结果表明,SoA的增加与亲环境行为有关,并展示了决策过程中的提示变量如何影响亲环境行为。此外,我们的研究结果表明,参与者对环境保护的态度与SoA和亲环境行为有很强的关联。SoA被认为是行动动机的一个关键方面;目前的研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明优化SoA可能为促进可持续性行为提供了急需的策略。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Motivating environment protection by elevating perceived control.","authors":"Katharina A Schwarz, Sarah Meier, Julia Menzel, Ariane Dreier, Roland Pfister","doi":"10.1037/xap0000550","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xap0000550","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a global community, humankind stands before a monumental challenge: to change our behavioral habits toward a more sustainable way of life. There are multiple paths toward that challenge, one of which is motivating citizens to engage in more pro-environmental behavior in everyday life. In this series of experiments (<i>N</i> = 521 participants), we pioneer a new paradigm that simulates everyday decision making via narrative-interactive choice elements to evaluate motivating strategies with a specific focus on sense of agency (SoA), that is, perceived control. To this end, we first characterize different individual motivators in fostering pro-environmental behavior. Further, in an experimental approach, we implement prompt variants into the narrative-interactive choice elements paradigm (color coding of choices vs. information on choice consequences) aligned with different aspects of SoA formation to test how SoA might facilitate pro-environmental decisions. Our results demonstrate that increased SoA is associated with pro-environmental behavior and showcase how prompt variants during decision making may affect pro-environmental behavior. Moreover, our results demonstrate a strong association of the participants' attitude toward environmental protection with SoA and pro-environmental behavior. SoA has been identified as a crucial aspect of action motivation; the present study provides compelling evidence that optimizing SoA may provide a much-needed strategy in fostering sustainability behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}