首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the Learning Sciences最新文献

英文 中文
Cyborg sociopolitical reconfigurations: Designing for speculative fabulation in learning 半机械人社会政治重构:为学习中的推测性虚构而设计
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2154159
J. Lizárraga
ABSTRACT Background Everyday digital technologies play an important role in mediating human activity that is socio-political and humanizing. The everyday cyborg engages in speculative fabulation that is about fantastical new world-making in times of multiple crises. The work presented in this article builds on previous projects that have examined how everyday cultural practices mediate consequential learning that is transformative for communities of color. Methods Two social design-based studies draw from ethnographic analysis of two teacher education courses as well as two after-school programs focusing on digital fabrication and making and tinkering. Participants included 22 undergraduate pre-service teachers and 10 middle school students from schools in Latinx communities. Findings Collaborative cyborg activity, where expertise is distributed, emerged as pre-service teachers and youth collectively engaged with everyday socio-political issues. This article highlights cyborg sociopolitical technical reconfigurations, where learners assembled ideational and material tools to craft objects of learning activity that went beyond those established by schooling and imagined new possible futures. Contribution Designing learning ecologies for the everyday cyborg, in this case pre-service teachers and non-dominant youth, fosters an engagement with everyday dilemmas in ways that serve as catalysts for further learning and the new world-making of speculative fabulation.
日常数字技术在调解社会政治和人性化的人类活动中发挥着重要作用。日常生活中的半机械人从事的是关于在多重危机时期创造奇妙新世界的投机虚构。本文中介绍的工作建立在以前的项目基础上,这些项目研究了日常文化实践如何介导对有色人种社区具有变革性的后果学习。方法两项基于社会设计的研究借鉴了对两门教师教育课程以及两门专注于数字制造和制作与修补的课后项目的民族志分析。参与者包括来自拉丁裔社区学校的22名本科职前教师和10名中学生。协作式半机械人活动是专业知识分布的地方,出现在职前教师和青年集体参与日常社会政治问题的过程中。本文强调了半机械人的社会政治技术重构,在这种重构中,学习者将概念和物质工具组合在一起,创造出超越学校教育所建立的学习活动对象,并想象出新的可能的未来。为日常的半机械人设计学习生态,在这个例子中是职前教师和非主导青年,促进了对日常困境的参与,这种参与方式作为进一步学习和投机虚构新世界创造的催化剂。
{"title":"Cyborg sociopolitical reconfigurations: Designing for speculative fabulation in learning","authors":"J. Lizárraga","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2154159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2154159","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Everyday digital technologies play an important role in mediating human activity that is socio-political and humanizing. The everyday cyborg engages in speculative fabulation that is about fantastical new world-making in times of multiple crises. The work presented in this article builds on previous projects that have examined how everyday cultural practices mediate consequential learning that is transformative for communities of color. Methods Two social design-based studies draw from ethnographic analysis of two teacher education courses as well as two after-school programs focusing on digital fabrication and making and tinkering. Participants included 22 undergraduate pre-service teachers and 10 middle school students from schools in Latinx communities. Findings Collaborative cyborg activity, where expertise is distributed, emerged as pre-service teachers and youth collectively engaged with everyday socio-political issues. This article highlights cyborg sociopolitical technical reconfigurations, where learners assembled ideational and material tools to craft objects of learning activity that went beyond those established by schooling and imagined new possible futures. Contribution Designing learning ecologies for the everyday cyborg, in this case pre-service teachers and non-dominant youth, fosters an engagement with everyday dilemmas in ways that serve as catalysts for further learning and the new world-making of speculative fabulation.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77113247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Critical policy analysis and gameplay 关键的政策分析和玩法
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2157178
Leigh Patel
I tossed this ball to a small class of four graduate students enrolled in a 2022 Critical Policy Analysis class. It matters less which programs they were enrolled, what their specific attraction to policy were. It very much mattered that they had told me, “whatever the midterm is, we want to do it together.” It matters very much that these four people and I had been able to create a space in which “how are you?” was a question, not a fly-by greeting and exit. We came to know a good deal about each other, with a living syllabus whose readings and topics were informed by their specific interests in education policy. In essence, we had formed more of a community workshop than a graduate course. It seemed like an opportune place to offer an analog game for the midterm To my question, they answered in resounding “Yes!” One person said, “I don’t really know what that means, but I’m excited to try it!” After class and for a few days, I furrowed my brow, paced around house, and kept wondering what I was going to design. What does it mean do to “design” a game? What had I gotten myself into? I offered this rather unusual assignment soon after I was able to participate in an enlivening workshop led by outdoor educator and analog game designer, Jeeyon Shim. As part of a speculative education conference, organized by Nicole Mirra and Antero Garcia. Over the course of a short amount of time, Jeeyon guided roughly a dozen educators and educational researchers through how important games are to beings of all ages and forms and how they are also a place where world-making can happen. We all created tiny homes during the workshop with Jeeyon, sharing one by one, pieces of our world. In the sharing, we came to know so much about each other that likely would not have surfaced had we not had about 15 minutes to gather items, small enough to fit into a confined material space, and big enough to illustrate wishes, desires, worries, and essentials for our respective worlds. As Templeton (2020) lifts up in their work that troubles adult’s gaze of
我把这个球扔给了一个由四名研究生组成的小班,他们参加了2022年的关键政策分析课程。他们参加了哪些项目,他们对政策的具体吸引力是什么,都不那么重要。重要的是,他们告诉我,“无论期中考试是什么,我们都要一起做。”重要的是,这四个人和我能够创造一个空间,在其中“你好吗?”这是一个问题,而不是敷衍的问候和退场。我们对彼此有了很好的了解,有了一个生动的教学大纲,其阅读材料和主题都是根据他们对教育政策的特定兴趣而定的。从本质上讲,我们更像是一个社区工作坊,而不是研究生课程。对于我的问题,他们的回答是响亮的“是的!”有人说:“我真的不知道这是什么意思,但我很高兴能尝试一下!”下课后的几天里,我皱着眉头,在房子里踱来踱去,一直在想我要设计什么。“设计”游戏意味着什么?我给自己惹了什么麻烦?在我能够参加由户外教育家和模拟游戏设计师Jeeyon Shim领导的充满活力的研讨会后不久,我就提出了这个相当不寻常的任务。这是由Nicole Mirra和Antero Garcia组织的投机教育会议的一部分。在很短的时间内,Jeeyon指导了大约12名教育工作者和教育研究人员,让他们了解游戏对所有年龄和形式的人有多重要,以及游戏如何成为创造世界的场所。在Jeeyon的工作坊中,我们都建造了小房子,一个接一个地分享我们的世界。在分享中,我们彼此了解了很多,如果我们没有15分钟的时间来收集物品,这些物品足够小,可以放进一个有限的物质空间,足够大,可以展示我们各自世界的愿望、欲望、担忧和必需品,这些东西可能不会浮出表面。正如邓普顿(2020)在他们的作品中脱颖而出,困扰着成年人的目光
{"title":"Critical policy analysis and gameplay","authors":"Leigh Patel","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2157178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2157178","url":null,"abstract":"I tossed this ball to a small class of four graduate students enrolled in a 2022 Critical Policy Analysis class. It matters less which programs they were enrolled, what their specific attraction to policy were. It very much mattered that they had told me, “whatever the midterm is, we want to do it together.” It matters very much that these four people and I had been able to create a space in which “how are you?” was a question, not a fly-by greeting and exit. We came to know a good deal about each other, with a living syllabus whose readings and topics were informed by their specific interests in education policy. In essence, we had formed more of a community workshop than a graduate course. It seemed like an opportune place to offer an analog game for the midterm To my question, they answered in resounding “Yes!” One person said, “I don’t really know what that means, but I’m excited to try it!” After class and for a few days, I furrowed my brow, paced around house, and kept wondering what I was going to design. What does it mean do to “design” a game? What had I gotten myself into? I offered this rather unusual assignment soon after I was able to participate in an enlivening workshop led by outdoor educator and analog game designer, Jeeyon Shim. As part of a speculative education conference, organized by Nicole Mirra and Antero Garcia. Over the course of a short amount of time, Jeeyon guided roughly a dozen educators and educational researchers through how important games are to beings of all ages and forms and how they are also a place where world-making can happen. We all created tiny homes during the workshop with Jeeyon, sharing one by one, pieces of our world. In the sharing, we came to know so much about each other that likely would not have surfaced had we not had about 15 minutes to gather items, small enough to fit into a confined material space, and big enough to illustrate wishes, desires, worries, and essentials for our respective worlds. As Templeton (2020) lifts up in their work that troubles adult’s gaze of","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88693490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utopian methodology: Researching educational interventions to promote equity over multiple timescales 乌托邦方法论:研究教育干预以促进多时间尺度上的公平
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2144736
Antti Rajala, M. Cole, M. Esteban-Guitart
ABSTRACT Background This article explores the methodological foundations for a utopian methodology as a form of Design-Based Intervention Research (DBR) that can guide the process of envisioning, implementing, sustaining, and critically evaluating the more radical forms of educational activity systems that prefigure the utopian goal of an equitable and humane education system. Methods We examine, guided by a utopian methodology lens, the examples from three national traditions for designing and implementing equitable educational activities. Each illuminates critical phases in the process of conducting DBR, combining social theory and cultural-historical activity theory. Findings We propose methodological principles for a utopian methodology as a form of DBR: a) Some conditions for sustaining and re-generating the utopian goal should be explicitly considered; b) Examine the recurring challenges to viability and achievability of the utopian design in its learning ecology that emerge for observation over multiple times scales; c) Self-critique and collaborative re-design for a new iteration. Contribution Taken as an ensemble, the cases analyzed here illustrate the broad usefulness of the utopian methodology that we propose in order to maintain the light of the utopian goal and challenge domestication process embedded in any process of change and transformation of the status quo.
本文探讨了乌托邦方法论的方法论基础,作为基于设计的干预研究(DBR)的一种形式,它可以指导设想、实施、维持和批判性评估更激进形式的教育活动系统的过程,这些教育活动系统预示着公平和人道的教育系统的乌托邦目标。在乌托邦方法论的指导下,我们研究了三个国家传统中设计和实施公平教育活动的例子。结合社会理论和文化历史活动理论,每一个都阐明了进行DBR过程中的关键阶段。我们提出了作为DBR形式的乌托邦方法论的方法论原则:a)应该明确考虑维持和再生乌托邦目标的一些条件;b)检查乌托邦设计在其学习生态中的可行性和可实现性所面临的反复出现的挑战,这些挑战出现在多个时间尺度的观察中;c)为新迭代进行自我批评和协作重新设计。作为一个整体,这里分析的案例说明了我们提出的乌托邦方法论的广泛用途,以保持乌托邦目标的光芒,并挑战任何改变和改造现状的过程中嵌入的驯化过程。
{"title":"Utopian methodology: Researching educational interventions to promote equity over multiple timescales","authors":"Antti Rajala, M. Cole, M. Esteban-Guitart","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2144736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2144736","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background This article explores the methodological foundations for a utopian methodology as a form of Design-Based Intervention Research (DBR) that can guide the process of envisioning, implementing, sustaining, and critically evaluating the more radical forms of educational activity systems that prefigure the utopian goal of an equitable and humane education system. Methods We examine, guided by a utopian methodology lens, the examples from three national traditions for designing and implementing equitable educational activities. Each illuminates critical phases in the process of conducting DBR, combining social theory and cultural-historical activity theory. Findings We propose methodological principles for a utopian methodology as a form of DBR: a) Some conditions for sustaining and re-generating the utopian goal should be explicitly considered; b) Examine the recurring challenges to viability and achievability of the utopian design in its learning ecology that emerge for observation over multiple times scales; c) Self-critique and collaborative re-design for a new iteration. Contribution Taken as an ensemble, the cases analyzed here illustrate the broad usefulness of the utopian methodology that we propose in order to maintain the light of the utopian goal and challenge domestication process embedded in any process of change and transformation of the status quo.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78007918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Prolepsis & telos: Interpreting pedagogy and recovering imagination in the mediation of youth learning 预言与目的:在青年学习中介中解释教学法与恢复想象
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2114833
Tesha Sengupta-Irving, Lauren Vogelstein, C. Brady, Emily Phillips Galloway
ABSTRACT Background Makerspaces are proliferating U.S. public schools and libraries. Few studies, however, take an in situ view on the pedagogical moves of mentors, and fewer still engage with ideologies of race and class therein. Without this, principles of pedagogy or design that build toward expansive learning for racially minoritized youth will remain elusive. Methods Semi-structured interviews and fieldnotes of mentors in a U.S. public library makerspace were taken over six weeks (n = 12). The mentors were predominantly white and all were professional artists/creatives; teen patrons were predominantly racially minoritized. Findings Three recurring pedagogical moves surfaced through the interplay of prolepsis and telos as an interpretive lens. We identify how mentor history/memory and future imaginings of youth as adult creatives—both of which intersect with ideologies of race and class—shape their mediation of learning. Contributions 1) Documentation of specific pedagogical moves that extend efforts to name the work of mentors; 2) Presentation of prolepsis and telos as a lens to recover the power of imagination in pedagogy; and 3) Extension of how prolepsis is used to the study human learning and development by bringing it in contact with the study of ideologies among educators.
创客空间正在美国的公立学校和图书馆蓬勃发展。然而,很少有研究对导师的教学行动采取现场观点,更少涉及其中的种族和阶级意识形态。没有这一点,为少数族裔青年建立广泛学习的教学原则或设计将仍然难以捉摸。方法对美国公共图书馆创客空间的导师进行为期六周的半结构化访谈和现场记录(n = 12)。导师主要是白人,而且都是专业艺术家/创意人员;青少年顾客主要是少数种族。发现三个反复出现的教学动作通过预言和目的的相互作用作为一个解释镜头浮出水面。我们确定导师的历史/记忆和青年的未来想象是如何作为成年人的创造者-这两者都与种族和阶级的意识形态相交-塑造他们的学习中介。贡献1)具体教学行动的文档,这些行动扩展了指导者工作的名称;2)以“预言”和“目的论”的呈现为视角,恢复教育学中的想象力;3)通过将预言学与教育工作者的意识形态研究联系起来,扩展了预言学如何用于研究人类的学习和发展。
{"title":"Prolepsis & telos: Interpreting pedagogy and recovering imagination in the mediation of youth learning","authors":"Tesha Sengupta-Irving, Lauren Vogelstein, C. Brady, Emily Phillips Galloway","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2114833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2114833","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Makerspaces are proliferating U.S. public schools and libraries. Few studies, however, take an in situ view on the pedagogical moves of mentors, and fewer still engage with ideologies of race and class therein. Without this, principles of pedagogy or design that build toward expansive learning for racially minoritized youth will remain elusive. Methods Semi-structured interviews and fieldnotes of mentors in a U.S. public library makerspace were taken over six weeks (n = 12). The mentors were predominantly white and all were professional artists/creatives; teen patrons were predominantly racially minoritized. Findings Three recurring pedagogical moves surfaced through the interplay of prolepsis and telos as an interpretive lens. We identify how mentor history/memory and future imaginings of youth as adult creatives—both of which intersect with ideologies of race and class—shape their mediation of learning. Contributions 1) Documentation of specific pedagogical moves that extend efforts to name the work of mentors; 2) Presentation of prolepsis and telos as a lens to recover the power of imagination in pedagogy; and 3) Extension of how prolepsis is used to the study human learning and development by bringing it in contact with the study of ideologies among educators.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79640366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Productive failure and learning through argumentation: Building a bridge between two research traditions to understand the process of peer learning 生产性失败和通过论证学习:在两种研究传统之间建立桥梁,以理解同伴学习的过程
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2120398
Antonia Larrain, V. Grau, María José Barrera, P. Freire, Patricia López, Sebastián Verdugo, Marisol Gómez, Francisca Ramírez, Gabriel Sánchez
ABSTRACT Empirical evidence demonstrates the effect of productive failure (Kapur, 2008) on disciplinary knowledge. However, there is no clear theoretical explanation for why this is the case. Empirical evidence on argumentation and education shows the impact of curricular embedded deliberative argumentation on learning. However, these two trends of research have been mainly isolated, with insufficient synergy. Through the analysis of a group of sixth-graders collaborating around problems of natural selection, the aim of this paper is the theoretical exploration of the process of learning in productive failure designs through a focus on argumentative peer dialogue. The paper proposes an articulation of these two fields of research (productive failure and argumentation), which sheds light on both the learning dynamics in productive failure settings and the relevant insights for argumentative designs. The new possibilities for empirical research on learning through peer interaction opened up by these interconnected fields of research are proposed and discussed.
经验证据证明了生产失败(Kapur, 2008)对学科知识的影响。然而,对于为什么会出现这种情况,并没有明确的理论解释。关于论证与教育的经验证据表明,课程嵌入的审慎论证对学习的影响。然而,这两种趋势的研究主要是孤立的,缺乏协同作用。通过对一组六年级学生围绕自然选择问题进行合作的分析,本文的目的是通过关注争论性同伴对话,对生产性失败设计中的学习过程进行理论探索。本文提出了这两个研究领域(生产性失败和论证)的衔接,这揭示了生产性失败设置中的学习动态和论证设计的相关见解。这些相互关联的研究领域为同伴互动学习的实证研究开辟了新的可能性。
{"title":"Productive failure and learning through argumentation: Building a bridge between two research traditions to understand the process of peer learning","authors":"Antonia Larrain, V. Grau, María José Barrera, P. Freire, Patricia López, Sebastián Verdugo, Marisol Gómez, Francisca Ramírez, Gabriel Sánchez","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2120398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2120398","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Empirical evidence demonstrates the effect of productive failure (Kapur, 2008) on disciplinary knowledge. However, there is no clear theoretical explanation for why this is the case. Empirical evidence on argumentation and education shows the impact of curricular embedded deliberative argumentation on learning. However, these two trends of research have been mainly isolated, with insufficient synergy. Through the analysis of a group of sixth-graders collaborating around problems of natural selection, the aim of this paper is the theoretical exploration of the process of learning in productive failure designs through a focus on argumentative peer dialogue. The paper proposes an articulation of these two fields of research (productive failure and argumentation), which sheds light on both the learning dynamics in productive failure settings and the relevant insights for argumentative designs. The new possibilities for empirical research on learning through peer interaction opened up by these interconnected fields of research are proposed and discussed.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87773453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Preservice science teachers’ epistemological framing in their early teaching 职前科学教师早期教学中的认识论框架
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2105649
Jihyun Chakrin, T. Campbell
ABSTRACT Background In the context of recent research in science education and continued struggles to understand how best to support science teachers, epistemological frames, made up of sets of epistemological resources teachers activate, have emerged as an important focus of research. However, at the time of this writing no research was available to identify the epistemological frames activated by preservice science teachers (PSTs). Methods In this research, using qualitative research methods, we studied and applied a coding scheme to identify 10 PSTs’ epistemological framing in their early teaching as part of a science teaching methods course. Three observations and three interviews of each PST served as primary data sources. Findings We found three main epistemological frames activated. Further, we identified the contexts in which these frames were activated, where contexts can be understood as situations characterized by different possible dimensions within which resources are activated. We also described dynamics noted by PSTs related to the activation of specific epistemological resources and identified frames. Contribution This research is a relatively new application of the epistemological framing framework that has potential to help science teacher educators better understand and support PST learning and practice.
摘要背景在最近科学教育研究的背景下,以及如何最好地支持科学教师的持续斗争中,由教师激活的认识论资源集组成的认识论框架已成为研究的一个重要焦点。然而,在撰写本文时,没有研究可用于识别职前科学教师(PSTs)激活的认识论框架。方法在本研究中,我们使用定性研究方法,研究并应用编码方案来识别10名pst在其早期教学中的认识论框架,作为科学教学方法课程的一部分。每个PST的三次观察和三次访谈是主要数据来源。我们发现三个主要的认识论框架被激活。此外,我们确定了这些框架被激活的情境,其中情境可以被理解为具有不同可能维度特征的情境,在这些维度中资源被激活。我们还描述了与特定认识论资源和识别框架的激活相关的PSTs注意到的动态。本研究是认识论框架的一个相对较新的应用,有可能帮助科学教师教育者更好地理解和支持PST的学习和实践。
{"title":"Preservice science teachers’ epistemological framing in their early teaching","authors":"Jihyun Chakrin, T. Campbell","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2105649","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2105649","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background In the context of recent research in science education and continued struggles to understand how best to support science teachers, epistemological frames, made up of sets of epistemological resources teachers activate, have emerged as an important focus of research. However, at the time of this writing no research was available to identify the epistemological frames activated by preservice science teachers (PSTs). Methods In this research, using qualitative research methods, we studied and applied a coding scheme to identify 10 PSTs’ epistemological framing in their early teaching as part of a science teaching methods course. Three observations and three interviews of each PST served as primary data sources. Findings We found three main epistemological frames activated. Further, we identified the contexts in which these frames were activated, where contexts can be understood as situations characterized by different possible dimensions within which resources are activated. We also described dynamics noted by PSTs related to the activation of specific epistemological resources and identified frames. Contribution This research is a relatively new application of the epistemological framing framework that has potential to help science teacher educators better understand and support PST learning and practice.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81552958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Material syntonicity: Examining computational performance and its materiality through weaving and sewing crafts 材料同质性:通过编织和缝纫工艺考察计算性能及其物质性
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2100704
A. Keune
ABSTRACT Background Fiber crafts occupy a vital position in technology innovation and present a promising space for computer science education, which continues to face lopsided participation. It remains unclear whether and how fiber crafts can become a context for computational learning and what role different materials play with the risk to miss computational approaches that could broaden computational cultures. Methods Fusing constructionist and posthuman perspectives, this study analyzed how middle school students performed computational concepts while weaving and manipulating fabric and how the craft materials drove what could be learned computationally in these contexts. Findings Present the fiber crafts as a context for performing computational concepts (i.e., variables, conditionals, functions) and that the materials play a role in what can be learned computationally. While weaving drove computing as the performance of automation, fabric manipulation required speculative and physical three-dimensional modeling as computational. Contribution The paper presents fiber crafts as a promising context for computational learning and theorizes the ongoing material as material syntonicity, contributing a material direction to fostering more inclusive and sustainable computing cultures.
摘要背景光纤工艺在技术创新中占有重要地位,为计算机科学教育提供了广阔的发展空间。目前尚不清楚纤维工艺是否以及如何成为计算学习的背景,以及不同的材料在错过可能扩大计算文化的计算方法的风险中扮演什么角色。方法本研究融合建构主义和后人类视角,分析中学生在编织和操作织物时如何执行计算概念,以及工艺材料如何推动在这些背景下可以计算学习的内容。研究结果将纤维工艺作为执行计算概念(即变量,条件,函数)的上下文,并且材料在可以通过计算学习的内容中发挥作用。织造作为自动化性能驱动计算,而织物操作则需要推测性和物理三维建模作为计算性。本文将纤维工艺作为计算学习的一个有前途的背景,并将正在进行的材料理论化为材料同质性,为培养更具包容性和可持续性的计算文化提供了一个材料方向。
{"title":"Material syntonicity: Examining computational performance and its materiality through weaving and sewing crafts","authors":"A. Keune","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2100704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2100704","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Fiber crafts occupy a vital position in technology innovation and present a promising space for computer science education, which continues to face lopsided participation. It remains unclear whether and how fiber crafts can become a context for computational learning and what role different materials play with the risk to miss computational approaches that could broaden computational cultures. Methods Fusing constructionist and posthuman perspectives, this study analyzed how middle school students performed computational concepts while weaving and manipulating fabric and how the craft materials drove what could be learned computationally in these contexts. Findings Present the fiber crafts as a context for performing computational concepts (i.e., variables, conditionals, functions) and that the materials play a role in what can be learned computationally. While weaving drove computing as the performance of automation, fabric manipulation required speculative and physical three-dimensional modeling as computational. Contribution The paper presents fiber crafts as a promising context for computational learning and theorizes the ongoing material as material syntonicity, contributing a material direction to fostering more inclusive and sustainable computing cultures.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80163826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Learning sciences and learning engineering: A natural or artificial distinction? 学习科学和学习工程:自然的还是人为的区别?
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-08-12 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2100705
Victor R. Lee
ABSTRACT “Learning engineering” has gained popularity as a term connected to the work of learning sciences. However, the nature of that connection is not entirely clear. For some, learning engineering represents distinct, industry-inspired practices enabled by data abundance and digital platformization of learning technologies. That view is presented as one where learning engineers apply learning research that has resided in experimental studies. For others, learning engineering should refer to the use of the full breadth of knowledge developed within the learning sciences research community. This second view is more inclusive of the fundamentally situated, design-oriented, and real-world commitments that are the backbone of the learning sciences, as reflected in this journal. The two views differ even as far as whether the academic field is labeled “learning science” or “learning sciences”. This article examines and articulates these differences. It also argues that without course correction, many who identify with learning engineering will conduct technology-supported learning improvement work that, at its own risk, will neglect the full and necessary scope of what has already been and continues to be discovered in the learning sciences. Moreover, it behooves all to consider recently elevated, but deeply fundamental questions being asked in the learning sciences about what is important to learn and toward what ends. With some more clarity around what is actually encompassed by the learning sciences and how all interested in design and educational improvement can build upon that knowledge, we can make greater collective progress to understanding and supporting human learning.
“学习工程”作为一个与学习科学工作相关的术语而越来越受欢迎。然而,这种联系的本质并不完全清楚。对于一些人来说,学习工程代表着独特的、受行业启发的实践,这些实践是由数据丰富和学习技术的数字平台化实现的。这种观点被认为是学习工程师应用于实验研究中的学习研究。对于其他人来说,学习工程应该指的是在学习科学研究社区内开发的知识的全部广度的使用。第二种观点更多地包含了作为学习科学支柱的基本定位、以设计为导向和现实世界的承诺,正如本刊所反映的那样。这两种观点甚至在学术领域是否被贴上“学习科学”或“学习科学”的标签上也存在分歧。本文研究并阐明了这些差异。它还认为,如果不进行课程修正,许多认同学习工程的人将进行技术支持的学习改进工作,这将在其自身的风险下,忽视在学习科学中已经发现和继续发现的全部和必要的范围。此外,所有人都有必要考虑最近在学习科学中提出的一些高度但又非常基本的问题:学习什么是重要的,为了什么目的。随着学习科学实际包含的内容更加清晰,以及所有对设计和教育改进感兴趣的人如何在这些知识的基础上建立起来,我们可以在理解和支持人类学习方面取得更大的集体进步。
{"title":"Learning sciences and learning engineering: A natural or artificial distinction?","authors":"Victor R. Lee","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2100705","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2100705","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT “Learning engineering” has gained popularity as a term connected to the work of learning sciences. However, the nature of that connection is not entirely clear. For some, learning engineering represents distinct, industry-inspired practices enabled by data abundance and digital platformization of learning technologies. That view is presented as one where learning engineers apply learning research that has resided in experimental studies. For others, learning engineering should refer to the use of the full breadth of knowledge developed within the learning sciences research community. This second view is more inclusive of the fundamentally situated, design-oriented, and real-world commitments that are the backbone of the learning sciences, as reflected in this journal. The two views differ even as far as whether the academic field is labeled “learning science” or “learning sciences”. This article examines and articulates these differences. It also argues that without course correction, many who identify with learning engineering will conduct technology-supported learning improvement work that, at its own risk, will neglect the full and necessary scope of what has already been and continues to be discovered in the learning sciences. Moreover, it behooves all to consider recently elevated, but deeply fundamental questions being asked in the learning sciences about what is important to learn and toward what ends. With some more clarity around what is actually encompassed by the learning sciences and how all interested in design and educational improvement can build upon that knowledge, we can make greater collective progress to understanding and supporting human learning.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90607341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Voice as an interactional accomplishment in art making about social issues 声音作为一种关于社会问题的艺术创作中的互动成就
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-07-20 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2091442
M. Dahn
ABSTRACT Background Art making is a personal and social process in which learners make meaning for themselves and audiences through the production of artifacts. In classrooms, this personal and social process is made concrete through dialogue. Methods This paper presents an illustrative case study of how sixth-grade student, Jo, developed voice through interaction with peers in a classroom context while making art about social issues. Interaction analysis methods supported inquiry into Jo’s talk about art making as she talked with peers in designed conversation spaces (i.e., intentional structures and opportunities to talk about artwork while making it). Findings Jo’s voice development illustrates the collaborative nature of voice as an interactional accomplishment; having a unique voice is something students might strive to achieve as artists, yet that voice is co-constructed through collective social interaction as students take up, appropriate, and build on others’ ideas. Artistic and political dimensions of art making were generative. Contribution Pedagogical implications are discussed for designing socially supported learning experiences in arts classrooms. What Jo’s case makes evident is that voice can be supported in classrooms through intentional pedagogical choices that create the conditions for that voice to develop through interactions with peers and materials.
艺术创作是一个个人和社会的过程,在这个过程中,学习者通过生产文物为自己和观众创造意义。在课堂上,这种个人和社会过程通过对话具体化。方法:本文提出了一个说明性的案例研究,研究六年级学生Jo如何在课堂上通过与同龄人的互动来发展声音,同时创作有关社会问题的艺术。互动分析方法支持对Jo在设计的对话空间(即有意的结构和在制作艺术品时谈论艺术品的机会)与同龄人交谈时谈论艺术创作的调查。Jo的语音发展说明了语音作为一种互动成就的协作性质;作为艺术家,拥有独特的声音可能是学生们努力实现的目标,但这种声音是通过集体社会互动共同构建的,因为学生们接受、采纳和建立了他人的想法。艺术创作的艺术和政治维度是生成性的。本文讨论了在艺术课堂中设计社会支持学习体验的教学意义。乔的案例清楚地表明,声音可以通过有意的教学选择在课堂上得到支持,这种选择为声音的发展创造了条件,通过与同龄人和材料的互动。
{"title":"Voice as an interactional accomplishment in art making about social issues","authors":"M. Dahn","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2091442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2091442","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Art making is a personal and social process in which learners make meaning for themselves and audiences through the production of artifacts. In classrooms, this personal and social process is made concrete through dialogue. Methods This paper presents an illustrative case study of how sixth-grade student, Jo, developed voice through interaction with peers in a classroom context while making art about social issues. Interaction analysis methods supported inquiry into Jo’s talk about art making as she talked with peers in designed conversation spaces (i.e., intentional structures and opportunities to talk about artwork while making it). Findings Jo’s voice development illustrates the collaborative nature of voice as an interactional accomplishment; having a unique voice is something students might strive to achieve as artists, yet that voice is co-constructed through collective social interaction as students take up, appropriate, and build on others’ ideas. Artistic and political dimensions of art making were generative. Contribution Pedagogical implications are discussed for designing socially supported learning experiences in arts classrooms. What Jo’s case makes evident is that voice can be supported in classrooms through intentional pedagogical choices that create the conditions for that voice to develop through interactions with peers and materials.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80224574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What do correct answers reveal? The interpersonal and mathematical aspects of students’ interactions during groupwork in seventh grade mathematics 正确答案揭示了什么?七年级数学小组作业中学生互动的人际关系和数学方面
IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2022.2073232
Anna F. DeJarnette
ABSTRACT Background Groupwork is a desirable activity in mathematics classrooms for the opportunity it creates for collaborative reasoning and interdependence. Correlations between group-level processes and outcomes have helped characterize the features of more successful groups, but group-level constructs can obscure how students negotiate ideas. This study investigated how students’ interactions, and the written work they produced, reflected their negotiations of authority and mathematics content during groupwork. Methods I used techniques from systemic functional linguistics to analyze transcripts from groups of 7th-grade students during work on an open-ended mathematics task, to document connections between groups’ interpersonal processes and their mathematical products. Findings Two groups who produced similar products did so through different processes. In one group students’ written work reflected consensus, evidenced by students’ verbal contributions. In the other group, the written product reflected two distinct lines of reasoning that were both verbalized but never integrated in conversation. Contribution While previous studies have documented differences in interactional patterns between more and, respectively, less successful groups, this study extends that line of research by describing differences between similarly successful groups. The use of SFL helps explain the path from group-level patterns and group outputs through individual students’ participation.
在数学课堂上,小组合作是一项理想的活动,因为它为协作推理和相互依存创造了机会。小组层面的过程和结果之间的相关性有助于描述更成功的小组的特征,但小组层面的结构可能会模糊学生如何协商想法。本研究调查了学生在小组作业中的互动和书面作业如何反映他们对权威和数学内容的协商。方法:我使用系统功能语言学的技术来分析七年级学生小组在开放式数学任务中的成绩单,以记录小组之间的人际关系过程和他们的数学产品之间的联系。两组生产相似产品的人是通过不同的过程生产的。在一组中,学生的书面作业反映了共识,学生的口头贡献证明了这一点。在另一组中,书面结果反映了两种截然不同的推理方式,都是口头表达的,但从未在对话中整合。虽然之前的研究分别记录了成功群体和不成功群体之间互动模式的差异,但本研究通过描述相似成功群体之间的差异扩展了这条研究线。SFL的使用有助于解释从群体层面模式到个体学生参与的群体产出的路径。
{"title":"What do correct answers reveal? The interpersonal and mathematical aspects of students’ interactions during groupwork in seventh grade mathematics","authors":"Anna F. DeJarnette","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2073232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2073232","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Groupwork is a desirable activity in mathematics classrooms for the opportunity it creates for collaborative reasoning and interdependence. Correlations between group-level processes and outcomes have helped characterize the features of more successful groups, but group-level constructs can obscure how students negotiate ideas. This study investigated how students’ interactions, and the written work they produced, reflected their negotiations of authority and mathematics content during groupwork. Methods I used techniques from systemic functional linguistics to analyze transcripts from groups of 7th-grade students during work on an open-ended mathematics task, to document connections between groups’ interpersonal processes and their mathematical products. Findings Two groups who produced similar products did so through different processes. In one group students’ written work reflected consensus, evidenced by students’ verbal contributions. In the other group, the written product reflected two distinct lines of reasoning that were both verbalized but never integrated in conversation. Contribution While previous studies have documented differences in interactional patterns between more and, respectively, less successful groups, this study extends that line of research by describing differences between similarly successful groups. The use of SFL helps explain the path from group-level patterns and group outputs through individual students’ participation.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81402264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Journal of the Learning Sciences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1