Monideepa Tarafdar, Jean-François Stich, Christian Maier, Sven Laumer
Technostress is an inevitable part of work life. This paper takes a step toward mastering it by focusing on positive stress that Information Systems (IS) creates for IS users, known as techno-eustress. Factors that create techno-eustress are known as techno-eustress creators, which we conceptualise as cognitions experienced by IS users, that IS positively challenges and motivates them to enhance their work. They are important to study because they represent foundational opportunities for professional achievement and growth emanating from IS use. Drawing from theories of psychological eustress, self-determination and proactive work, this paper theorises and validates an instrument to measure techno-eustress creators. We establish the construct's validity and examine its nomological relationships based on data collected from working professionals who used IT for their work. We draw on data from two qualitative studies (N = 35) and three quantitative surveys (N = 980) conducted at different points in time. We validate techno-eustress creators as a second-order reflective construct having four dimensions: techno-mastery, techno-autonomy, techno-enrichment and techno-relatedness. We examine its nomological relationships with factors that create techno-distress, IT strain, and user satisfaction. We contribute to the literature by theorising and validating four ways in which IS users are challenged and motivated by IS to enhance their work. We inform to managerial practice by drawing attention to how organisations can strengthen the different ways employees experience the creators of the ‘good’ stress that use of IS generates.
技术压力是工作生活中不可避免的一部分。本文通过关注信息系统(IS)为 IS 用户创造的积极压力(即技术压力),向掌握技术压力迈出了一步。产生技术性压力的因素被称为技术性压力的创造者,我们将其概念化为 IS 用户体验到的认知,即 IS 对他们的工作提出了积极的挑战和激励。对它们进行研究非常重要,因为它们代表了因使用信息系统而获得专业成就和成长的基础机会。本文从心理压力、自我决定和积极主动工作的理论出发,提出并验证了一种测量技术压力创造者的工具。我们根据从工作中使用信息技术的专业人士那里收集到的数据,确定了这一概念的有效性,并研究了其名义关系。我们借鉴了在不同时间点进行的两项定性研究(N = 35)和三项定量调查(N = 980)的数据。我们验证了技术压力创造者作为一个二阶反思性建构,具有四个维度:技术精通、技术自主、技术丰富和技术相关性。我们研究了它与造成技术压力、信息技术压力和用户满意度的因素之间的名义关系。我们从理论上论证并验证了信息系统用户受到信息系统挑战和激励以提高工作效率的四种方式,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。我们通过提请注意组织如何加强员工体验使用信息系统所产生的 "良好 "压力的创造者的不同方式,为管理实践提供信息。
{"title":"Techno-eustress creators: Conceptualization and empirical validation","authors":"Monideepa Tarafdar, Jean-François Stich, Christian Maier, Sven Laumer","doi":"10.1111/isj.12515","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12515","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technostress is an inevitable part of work life. This paper takes a step toward mastering it by focusing on positive stress that Information Systems (IS) creates for IS users, known as techno-eustress. Factors that create techno-eustress are known as techno-eustress creators, which we conceptualise as cognitions experienced by IS users, that IS positively challenges and motivates them to enhance their work. They are important to study because they represent foundational opportunities for professional achievement and growth emanating from IS use. Drawing from theories of psychological eustress, self-determination and proactive work, this paper theorises and validates an instrument to measure techno-eustress creators. We establish the construct's validity and examine its nomological relationships based on data collected from working professionals who used IT for their work. We draw on data from two qualitative studies (<i>N</i> = 35) and three quantitative surveys (<i>N</i> = 980) conducted at different points in time. We validate techno-eustress creators as a second-order reflective construct having four dimensions: techno-mastery, techno-autonomy, techno-enrichment and techno-relatedness. We examine its nomological relationships with factors that create techno-distress, IT strain, and user satisfaction. We contribute to the literature by theorising and validating four ways in which IS users are challenged and motivated by IS to enhance their work. We inform to managerial practice by drawing attention to how organisations can strengthen the different ways employees experience the creators of the ‘good’ stress that use of IS generates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"2097-2131"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12515","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140697990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>In contemporary discourse, a discernible surge in socio-cultural fragmentation, political schism and right-wing hate speech has emerged, exacerbated by the proliferation of extremist ideologies and discriminatory rhetoric (Das & Schroeder, <span>2021</span>; Ghasiya & Sasahara, <span>2022</span>; Hameleers, <span>2022</span>; Risius et al., <span>2024</span>). This phenomenon is starkly evident in online harassment, the dissemination of misinformation and the normalisation of confrontational dialogue, indicating a pressing demand for the cultivation of inclusive digital environments. Over the past two decades, the evolution of social media platforms has significantly contributed to this trend by employing algorithmic curation and engendering personalised information bubbles that foster heightened polarisation and the segregation of content consumption. While these platforms offer societal benefits such as timely access to news, they concurrently erode trust and facilitate the dissemination of extreme viewpoints and conspiracy theories (Abdalla Mikhaeil & Baskerville, <span>2024</span>). Consequently, they have led to cyberbalkanisation, amplifying societal divides along the faultlines of ethnicity, religion, ideologies and sexual orientation. Compounded by a decline in trust in both institutions and fellow citizens, this expansion of communication avenues has provided fertile ground for the proliferation of extreme opinions, accompanied by challenges such as the dissemination of misinformation and the propagation of toxic headlines. Thus, an imminent imperative exists for scholarly inquiry aimed at comprehending the theoretical foundations of social media-induced polarisation and devising effective interventions to mitigate its deleterious societal impacts.</p><p>In the context of contemporary democracies, public deliberation, which is fundamental for societal progress, faces formidable barriers such as escalating incivility, the propagation of misinformation and polarisation across political, environmental and social spectra (French et al., <span>2024</span>; Miller et al., <span>2024</span>; Weismueller et al., <span>2024</span>). Despite serving as hubs for diverse interactions, social media platforms concurrently foster echo chambers, potentially obstructing the possibility of bridging divides. The complex interplay between social media and polarisation remains a contentious subject, with divergent perspectives on its role in shaping online discourse (Qureshi et al., <span>2020</span>). However, the ramifications of social media extend far beyond political domains, influencing environmental activism, public health responses and business marketing strategies. Moreover, the algorithmic curation utilised by these platforms poses formidable challenges, as it may exacerbate echo chambers and impede the exchange of diverse viewpoints (cf. Miller et al., <span>2024</span>). These platforms play a pivotal role in shaping societal dynam
{"title":"Social media-induced polarisation","authors":"Israr Qureshi, Babita Bhatt","doi":"10.1111/isj.12525","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12525","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In contemporary discourse, a discernible surge in socio-cultural fragmentation, political schism and right-wing hate speech has emerged, exacerbated by the proliferation of extremist ideologies and discriminatory rhetoric (Das & Schroeder, <span>2021</span>; Ghasiya & Sasahara, <span>2022</span>; Hameleers, <span>2022</span>; Risius et al., <span>2024</span>). This phenomenon is starkly evident in online harassment, the dissemination of misinformation and the normalisation of confrontational dialogue, indicating a pressing demand for the cultivation of inclusive digital environments. Over the past two decades, the evolution of social media platforms has significantly contributed to this trend by employing algorithmic curation and engendering personalised information bubbles that foster heightened polarisation and the segregation of content consumption. While these platforms offer societal benefits such as timely access to news, they concurrently erode trust and facilitate the dissemination of extreme viewpoints and conspiracy theories (Abdalla Mikhaeil & Baskerville, <span>2024</span>). Consequently, they have led to cyberbalkanisation, amplifying societal divides along the faultlines of ethnicity, religion, ideologies and sexual orientation. Compounded by a decline in trust in both institutions and fellow citizens, this expansion of communication avenues has provided fertile ground for the proliferation of extreme opinions, accompanied by challenges such as the dissemination of misinformation and the propagation of toxic headlines. Thus, an imminent imperative exists for scholarly inquiry aimed at comprehending the theoretical foundations of social media-induced polarisation and devising effective interventions to mitigate its deleterious societal impacts.</p><p>In the context of contemporary democracies, public deliberation, which is fundamental for societal progress, faces formidable barriers such as escalating incivility, the propagation of misinformation and polarisation across political, environmental and social spectra (French et al., <span>2024</span>; Miller et al., <span>2024</span>; Weismueller et al., <span>2024</span>). Despite serving as hubs for diverse interactions, social media platforms concurrently foster echo chambers, potentially obstructing the possibility of bridging divides. The complex interplay between social media and polarisation remains a contentious subject, with divergent perspectives on its role in shaping online discourse (Qureshi et al., <span>2020</span>). However, the ramifications of social media extend far beyond political domains, influencing environmental activism, public health responses and business marketing strategies. Moreover, the algorithmic curation utilised by these platforms poses formidable challenges, as it may exacerbate echo chambers and impede the exchange of diverse viewpoints (cf. Miller et al., <span>2024</span>). These platforms play a pivotal role in shaping societal dynam","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 4","pages":"1425-1431"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12525","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140696011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although health information systems (HIS) play an important role in elevating health standards, a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively implement HIS in rural areas is lacking. This issue becomes more significant when considering that globally a majority of the approximately 1.5 million deaths of children under the age of five in 2019 that were attributable to vaccine-preventable diseases occurred in rural areas. Accordingly, we ask two questions. How does rurality influence the implementation of information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) projects? How do organisations navigate challenges associated with rurality during the implementation of these projects? Our findings, derived from an in-depth case study of a social enterprise in rural India, reveal two paradoxes that pose challenges to the effective implementation of HIS in rural settings: the localisation paradox and the cultural embedding paradox. We found that contextually balanced engagement was comprised of four organisational responses—prioritising; localising; cultural adjustment; and engaging stakeholders—that help navigate the challenges posed by the localisation and cultural embedding paradoxes. Synthesising these findings, we develop a process model that shows how the implementation of HIS in rural areas is shaped by the descriptive and sociocultural characteristics of rurality. Further, organisations require a dynamic approach, engaging in multiple responses over time to navigate the paradoxes inherent in HIS implementation. We suggest that organisational responses to paradoxical tensions stemming from the descriptive and sociocultural characteristics of rurality lead to the development of HIS enabled for rurality. Our findings contribute the understanding of ICT4D projects implementation.
尽管卫生信息系统(HIS)在提高卫生标准方面发挥着重要作用,但人们对如何在农村地区有效实施卫生信息系统缺乏全面了解。考虑到 2019 年全球约有 150 万五岁以下儿童死于可通过疫苗预防的疾病,其中大部分发生在农村地区,这个问题就变得更加重要。因此,我们提出了两个问题。农村地区如何影响信息和通信技术促进发展(ICT4D)项目的实施?在实施这些项目的过程中,各组织如何应对与农村地区相关的挑战?我们对印度农村地区的一家社会企业进行了深入的案例研究,研究结果揭示了在农村地区有效实施信息与传播技术促进发展项目所面临的两个悖论:本地化悖论和文化嵌入悖论。我们发现,情境平衡的参与包括四种组织反应--优先化、本地化、文化调整和利益相关者参与--这有助于应对本地化和文化嵌入悖论带来的挑战。综合这些研究结果,我们建立了一个过程模型,该模型显示了在农村地区实施 HIS 如何受到农村描述性特征和社会文化特征的影响。此外,组织需要一种动态的方法,随着时间的推移采取多种应对措施,以驾驭 HIS 实施过程中固有的悖论。我们认为,组织对农村的描述性特征和社会文化特征所产生的矛盾张力的反应,导致了为农村地区而启用的 HIS 的发展。我们的研究结果有助于理解 ICT4D 项目的实施。
{"title":"Contextually balanced engagement: Navigating paradoxes of localisation and cultural embedding in rural health information systems implementation","authors":"Israr Qureshi, Dhirendra Mani Shukla, Babita Bhatt, Pradeep Hota, Ruonan Sun","doi":"10.1111/isj.12522","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12522","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although health information systems (HIS) play an important role in elevating health standards, a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively implement HIS in rural areas is lacking. This issue becomes more significant when considering that globally a majority of the approximately 1.5 million deaths of children under the age of five in 2019 that were attributable to vaccine-preventable diseases occurred in rural areas. Accordingly, we ask two questions. How does rurality influence the implementation of information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) projects? How do organisations navigate challenges associated with rurality during the implementation of these projects? Our findings, derived from an in-depth case study of a social enterprise in rural India, reveal two paradoxes that pose challenges to the effective implementation of HIS in rural settings: the localisation paradox and the cultural embedding paradox. We found that contextually balanced engagement was comprised of four organisational responses—prioritising; localising; cultural adjustment; and engaging stakeholders—that help navigate the challenges posed by the localisation and cultural embedding paradoxes. Synthesising these findings, we develop a process model that shows how the implementation of HIS in rural areas is shaped by the descriptive and sociocultural characteristics of rurality. Further, organisations require a dynamic approach, engaging in multiple responses over time to navigate the paradoxes inherent in HIS implementation. We suggest that organisational responses to paradoxical tensions stemming from the descriptive and sociocultural characteristics of rurality lead to the development of HIS <b>e</b>nabled for rurality. Our findings contribute the understanding of ICT4D projects implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"2024-2059"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12522","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140717378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mariana Giovanna Andrade-Rojas, Michael A. Erskine
In this study, we examine the effects of bribery on the digitization of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) within Latin America. We apply neo-institutional theory as the overarching theoretical framework to establish that bribery negatively influences digitization. We propose that firm characteristics (i.e., managerial experience and firm size) affect the firm-level relationship between bribery and digitization. We also examine how the perceived tax burden mediates the effect of bribery on digitization. Our study is both theoretically and practically relevant. Theoretically, we are among the first to explicate the direct relationship between bribery and digitization. This novel perspective extends the information systems literature to explain digitization challenges in Latin America. For managers and policymakers, we present a path towards essential digitization for Latin American SMEs. Our empirical analysis uses secondary data from a World Bank survey of 1549 Latin American SMEs conducted over three years in six countries. Our findings show that bribery negatively influences digitization while SME characteristics positively moderate this relationship. In addition, we show that the perceived tax burden mediates the effects of bribery on digitization.
{"title":"The effects of bribery on the digitization of small and medium enterprises in Latin America","authors":"Mariana Giovanna Andrade-Rojas, Michael A. Erskine","doi":"10.1111/isj.12523","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12523","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we examine the effects of bribery on the digitization of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) within Latin America. We apply neo-institutional theory as the overarching theoretical framework to establish that bribery negatively influences digitization. We propose that firm characteristics (i.e., managerial experience and firm size) affect the firm-level relationship between bribery and digitization. We also examine how the perceived tax burden mediates the effect of bribery on digitization. Our study is both theoretically and practically relevant. Theoretically, we are among the first to explicate the direct relationship between bribery and digitization. This novel perspective extends the information systems literature to explain digitization challenges in Latin America. For managers and policymakers, we present a path towards essential digitization for Latin American SMEs. Our empirical analysis uses secondary data from a World Bank survey of 1549 Latin American SMEs conducted over three years in six countries. Our findings show that bribery negatively influences digitization while SME characteristics positively moderate this relationship. In addition, we show that the perceived tax burden mediates the effects of bribery on digitization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"2060-2096"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140719672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Charlotte Wendt, Dominick Kosin, Martin Adam, Alexander Benlian
The growing adoption of smart meters enables the measurement of households' energy consumption, influenced not solely by building characteristics such as thermal insulation but also by residents' behavioural patterns, such as heating and ventilation practices. To motivate residents to adopt more sustainable behaviours, user interfaces on smartphones and laptops are increasingly using consumption data from households' smart meters to enable effective goal-setting. In contrast to previous research largely focusing on goal-setting in isolation, this study examines the role of specific social comparison-related design features that future research and practitioners can consider along with goal-setting to stimulate sustainable behaviours. Specifically, we look into the influence of residents' perception of their relative performance (i.e., whether their behaviour was better or worse than a reference group) on their ambition to act (i.e., targeted improvement goal) and their actual energy consumption behaviour. Moreover, we investigate the influence of a goal's evaluative standard (i.e., whether the goal refers to one's own or other's performance) on the relationship between relative performance, ambition to act, and energy consumption behaviour. Drawing on social comparison theory, we conducted a framed field experiment with 152 households. We find that a goal's evaluative standard influences residents' awareness of their relative performance, affecting their ambition to act and, ultimately, their energy consumption behaviour. More specifically, we find that whereas other- (vs. self-) referencing goals encourage residents from worse-than-average performing households more strongly to improve their energy consumption behaviour, they discourage better-than-average ones. Overall, our study provides novel insights into the interplay between relative performance and evaluative standards as a means of fostering social comparison in smart meter-facilitated goal-setting, highlighting their crucial role in effectively supporting sustainable behaviours.
{"title":"Sustainable energy consumption behaviour with smart meters: The role of relative performance and evaluative standards","authors":"Charlotte Wendt, Dominick Kosin, Martin Adam, Alexander Benlian","doi":"10.1111/isj.12520","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12520","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growing adoption of smart meters enables the measurement of households' energy consumption, influenced not solely by building characteristics such as thermal insulation but also by residents' behavioural patterns, such as heating and ventilation practices. To motivate residents to adopt more sustainable behaviours, user interfaces on smartphones and laptops are increasingly using consumption data from households' smart meters to enable effective goal-setting. In contrast to previous research largely focusing on goal-setting in isolation, this study examines the role of specific social comparison-related design features that future research and practitioners can consider along with goal-setting to stimulate sustainable behaviours. Specifically, we look into the influence of residents' perception of their <i>relative performance</i> (i.e., whether their behaviour was better or worse than a reference group) on their ambition to act (i.e., targeted improvement goal) and their actual energy consumption behaviour. Moreover, we investigate the influence of a goal's <i>evaluative standard</i> (i.e., whether the goal refers to one's own or other's performance) on the relationship between relative performance, ambition to act, and energy consumption behaviour. Drawing on social comparison theory, we conducted a framed field experiment with 152 households. We find that a goal's evaluative standard influences residents' awareness of their relative performance, affecting their ambition to act and, ultimately, their energy consumption behaviour. More specifically, we find that whereas other- (vs. self-) referencing goals encourage residents from worse-than-average performing households more strongly to improve their energy consumption behaviour, they discourage better-than-average ones. Overall, our study provides novel insights into the interplay between relative performance and evaluative standards as a means of fostering social comparison in smart meter-facilitated goal-setting, highlighting their crucial role in effectively supporting sustainable behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"1995-2023"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12520","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140380694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper examines the question of doing information systems (IS) research from a location, particularly from a developing country like India. Our analysis reveals that IS publications from India are relatively few in number, though increasing in recent years; hardly focussed on context-specific issues and concerns; and are largely in lower-ranked journals. Using neo-institutional theory, we show that the reasons are dominantly coercive (measuring up to rankings and accreditation agencies) and mimetic (following leaders). Normative (influence of professional bodies) forces appear to counterbalance this by necessitating continuous improvement in research outputs and emphasising location-specific, impactful research. Institutional responses to these forces manifest in policies and mechanisms to operationalise them, such as resource availability, balancing teaching load with research expectations, promotion and tenure policies amongst others. We examine the paths by which more rigorous and relevant research, responsible to a location can be achieved, based on the insights from a series of talks given by eminent IS scholars. We opine that there is a need to consciously seek out such paths, perhaps by actively seeking collaboration with other disciplines and practitioners; establishing programmes of research; and building contextualised theories. We conclude with a relook at the underlying dynamics of the various institutional responses, recommended paths and some policy implications of our findings.
{"title":"Does location matter in IS research? A developing country perspective from India","authors":"Priya Seetharaman, Saji K. Mathew, Rahul De'","doi":"10.1111/isj.12521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12521","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the question of doing information systems (IS) research from a location, particularly from a developing country like India. Our analysis reveals that IS publications from India are relatively few in number, though increasing in recent years; hardly focussed on context-specific issues and concerns; and are largely in lower-ranked journals. Using neo-institutional theory, we show that the reasons are dominantly coercive (measuring up to rankings and accreditation agencies) and mimetic (following leaders). Normative (influence of professional bodies) forces appear to counterbalance this by necessitating continuous improvement in research outputs and emphasising location-specific, impactful research. Institutional responses to these forces manifest in policies and mechanisms to operationalise them, such as resource availability, balancing teaching load with research expectations, promotion and tenure policies amongst others. We examine the paths by which more rigorous and relevant research, responsible to a location can be achieved, based on the insights from a series of talks given by eminent IS scholars. We opine that there is a need to consciously seek out such paths, perhaps by actively seeking collaboration with other disciplines and practitioners; establishing programmes of research; and building contextualised theories. We conclude with a relook at the underlying dynamics of the various institutional responses, recommended paths and some policy implications of our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"1963-1994"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142430092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study explores how digital platforms generate economic and non-economic value for a specific group of users: mumpreneurs. We collected qualitative data from 26 mumpreneurs in the United Kingdom who have caring responsibilities for young children and are running a business on the community-based platform Instagram. We found that through using Instagram and its algorithms, mumpreneurs can create various types of value in this context. Drawing on previous research into value creation, we make several contributions to the information systems literature. First, we unpack and explain alternative forms of value generated by digital platforms. Our findings show that through community-based platforms such as Instagram, mumpreneurs can create various types of economic and non-economic value—engagement, cognitive, economic, and self-preservation value—that is consistent with their business, social, and personal needs. Second, we propose a process model of value creation; and we identify two mechanisms that lead to value creation through Instagram's algorithms: recommended connectivity and adaptability. Third, we identify a temporal dimension of value creation through Instagram. This article contributes to the theory in the growing body of literature on value creation linked to digital platforms and explains several implications for theory and practice.
{"title":"Exploring how mumpreneurs use digital platforms' algorithms and mechanisms to generate different types of value","authors":"Nisreen Ameen, Vera Hoelscher, Niki Panteli","doi":"10.1111/isj.12518","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12518","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores how digital platforms generate economic and non-economic value for a specific group of users: mumpreneurs. We collected qualitative data from 26 mumpreneurs in the United Kingdom who have caring responsibilities for young children and are running a business on the community-based platform Instagram. We found that through using Instagram and its algorithms, mumpreneurs can create various types of value in this context. Drawing on previous research into value creation, we make several contributions to the information systems literature. First, we unpack and explain alternative forms of value generated by digital platforms. Our findings show that through community-based platforms such as Instagram, mumpreneurs can create various types of economic and non-economic value—<i>engagement</i>, <i>cognitive</i>, <i>economic</i>, and <i>self-preservation value</i>—that is consistent with their business, social, and personal needs. Second, we propose a process model of value creation; and we identify two mechanisms that lead to value creation through Instagram's algorithms: <i>recommended connectivity</i> and <i>adaptability</i>. Third, we identify a temporal dimension of value creation through Instagram. This article contributes to the theory in the growing body of literature on value creation linked to digital platforms and explains several implications for theory and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"1935-1962"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12518","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140236664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jana Mattern, Monideepa Tarafdar, Stefan Klein, Stefan Schellhammer
We report on a study of high performing IT professionals in a global IT services company, whose exceptional performance in a highly demanding work environment raises the question of how they cope with their occupational demands. While literature has focused primarily on technology-induced stressors and associated coping behaviours of IT users, our study examines distinctive coping behaviours of IT professionals in response to diverse occupational demands. We combine qualitative interviews and heart rate variability data from an exemplar sample of 15 high performing IT professionals to provide insights into their psychological and physiological strain levels respectively. Our participants exhibit four strain levels, each related to a distinctive combination of coping behaviours, which we abductively theorise as coping portfolios. We find that high performing IT professionals with both a low psychological and physiological strain level apply a broad and varied portfolio of coping behaviours in response to diverse occupational demands. We contribute to IS research on IT professionals by studying the coping behaviours of an exemplar sample of high performing IT professionals in a leading IT firm. Theoretically, we complement the established concepts of coping flexibility and coping repertoires by introducing the notion of coping portfolios.
我们报告了对一家全球 IT 服务公司的高绩效 IT 专业人员的研究,他们在高要求的工作环境中的出色表现引发了他们如何应对职业需求的问题。文献主要关注技术引发的压力以及 IT 用户的相关应对行为,而我们的研究则探讨了 IT 专业人员在应对不同职业需求时的独特应对行为。我们将定性访谈和心率变异性数据结合起来,从 15 位高绩效 IT 专业人士的样本中分别深入了解他们的心理和生理压力水平。我们的参与者表现出四种压力水平,每种水平都与应对行为的独特组合有关,我们将其归纳为应对组合理论。我们发现,心理和生理压力水平都较低的高绩效 IT 专业人员在应对不同的职业需求时,会采用广泛而多样的应对行为组合。我们通过研究一家领先 IT 企业中高绩效 IT 专业人员的应对行为样本,为有关 IT 专业人员的 IS 研究做出了贡献。从理论上讲,我们引入了应对组合的概念,从而补充了应对灵活性和应对复制品的既定概念。
{"title":"Thriving in a bruising job: How high achieving IT professionals can cope with occupational demands","authors":"Jana Mattern, Monideepa Tarafdar, Stefan Klein, Stefan Schellhammer","doi":"10.1111/isj.12513","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12513","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We report on a study of high performing IT professionals in a global IT services company, whose exceptional performance in a highly demanding work environment raises the question of how they cope with their occupational demands. While literature has focused primarily on technology-induced stressors and associated coping behaviours of IT users, our study examines distinctive coping behaviours of IT professionals in response to diverse occupational demands. We combine qualitative interviews and heart rate variability data from an exemplar sample of 15 high performing IT professionals to provide insights into their psychological and physiological strain levels respectively. Our participants exhibit four strain levels, each related to a distinctive combination of coping behaviours, which we abductively theorise as coping portfolios. We find that high performing IT professionals with both a low psychological and physiological strain level apply a broad and varied portfolio of coping behaviours in response to diverse occupational demands. We contribute to IS research on IT professionals by studying the coping behaviours of an exemplar sample of high performing IT professionals in a leading IT firm. Theoretically, we complement the established concepts of coping flexibility and coping repertoires by introducing the notion of coping portfolios.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"1902-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12513","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140249018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The editors of academic journals, and by editor I am referring to all people who serve in editorial roles, whether Editor in Chief, Senior or Associate Editor, have a duty of care for multiple stakeholders (Tarafdar & Davison, <span>2021</span>). However, in enacting that duty, while they may refer to the ethical standards established for the specific journal and the professional society to which they belong, they will also be strongly influenced by their own, individual ethical sense. Ethics, in my view, are rarely absolute: what is appropriate in one context may not be appropriate in another, and so some nuanced reflection about the correct action to take is often warranted. However, more significant conflicts can arise between the various normative and personal influences and when this happens, editors may find themselves in a tricky situation that even mature reflection cannot easily address. Eckhardt and Breidbach (<span>2024</span>) offer a set of perspectives about ethical issues that editors may face. In this editorial, I offer a complementary set of thoughts that explore some more ethical issues that editors may encounter, and the consequences of these issues for different stakeholders. I recognise that ethics is, in its very nature, a complex topic. Any action taken by an editor might be seen as gross negligence by some yet only as a minor misdemeanour by others. Thus, in writing this editorial I have been mindful not to employ too many of my own values in evaluating these issues. I prefer to leave that to the readers. What I have done is to select examples, all of which are real (some disguised to preserve the modesty of the people involved) that cover a number of different situations.</p><p>Consider the example of an Associate Editor (AE) who is assigned a paper to handle. AEs typically know the identity of the author: this is necessary to ensure that authors are not inadvertently invited to review their own papers. AEs are also trusted to take care that the people they invite to be reviewers are not conflicted with the author in some way, for instance whether as recent colleagues, co-authors, or in some other role. Ascertaining the absence of a conflict of interest requires some care: it is not just a matter of finding the most suitable reviewers from a topic, method or epistemological perspective. A careful AE will not only shortlist a number of potential reviewers, but will also carefully check their suitability on ethical grounds. In practice, in a field as large as Information Systems, conflicts of interest don't happen that often since there are many potential reviewers for any given manuscript, but nevertheless when they do arise they can be spectacular. In a recent case, an AE invited (innocently, but perhaps carelessly) three reviewers, all of whom had a conflict of significant interest with an author: one was the spouse, one the supervisor and the last, a former student. Two of these worked in the same institution as
我希望这样的投诉并不常见,因为即使投稿得到的决定是作者不期望或不想要的,至少也有令人信服的理由来支持这一决定。事实上,在 ISJ,我们收到的对我们建设性审稿的赞扬(即使是在拒稿的情况下)要比收到的投诉多得多。除了利益冲突之外,在审稿过程中还很容易发现一些偏见,这些偏见会引起道德方面的关注。审稿人本身可能会对主题、方法、认识论和研究背景持有偏见(见 Davison, 2013, 2014),编辑也难免会有偏见。例如,在邀请哪些审稿人、建议作者引用哪些论文以及邀请作者采用哪些(替代)方法或途径等方面,都会存在偏见。Eckhardt 和 Breidbach(2024 年)对其中一些问题进行了有益的探讨,我就不再重复他们的论点或建议了。然而,AE 指定的审稿人要么不合格(他们可能不熟悉方法),要么声名狼藉(AE 知道),拒绝每一篇经过他们办公桌的论文。或者,我们应该如何看待 SE 建议作者如果采用 SE 自己喜欢的方法(这意味着要收集/分析新的数据),就会更容易被接受;或者 EinC 有条件地接受一篇论文,但条件之一是作者必须引用六篇特定的文章(均由 EinC 或他以前的博士生撰写),而这些文章显然都与研究课题无关?后面这些例子都是我注意到的真实案例(作为作者和编辑)。我认为,每种情况都有其道德方面的问题,尽管你对它的重视程度可能不同。如果您认为某位SE或AE的行为不道德,您可能应该先找EinC解释情况。管理完善的期刊通常都有健全的程序来处理此类投诉。如果您对处理结果不满意,或认为EinC的行为不道德,最好与出版商联系。确保保留所有证据,直到最终解决问题。出版商可能是最后的解决办法,但根据我的经验,除非情况确实非常严重,否则出版商是不愿意介入的。不幸的是,您可能不得不学会回避某些期刊,至少在EinC改变之前是这样。
{"title":"Ethics III: The ethics of editing","authors":"Robert M. Davison","doi":"10.1111/isj.12517","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12517","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The editors of academic journals, and by editor I am referring to all people who serve in editorial roles, whether Editor in Chief, Senior or Associate Editor, have a duty of care for multiple stakeholders (Tarafdar & Davison, <span>2021</span>). However, in enacting that duty, while they may refer to the ethical standards established for the specific journal and the professional society to which they belong, they will also be strongly influenced by their own, individual ethical sense. Ethics, in my view, are rarely absolute: what is appropriate in one context may not be appropriate in another, and so some nuanced reflection about the correct action to take is often warranted. However, more significant conflicts can arise between the various normative and personal influences and when this happens, editors may find themselves in a tricky situation that even mature reflection cannot easily address. Eckhardt and Breidbach (<span>2024</span>) offer a set of perspectives about ethical issues that editors may face. In this editorial, I offer a complementary set of thoughts that explore some more ethical issues that editors may encounter, and the consequences of these issues for different stakeholders. I recognise that ethics is, in its very nature, a complex topic. Any action taken by an editor might be seen as gross negligence by some yet only as a minor misdemeanour by others. Thus, in writing this editorial I have been mindful not to employ too many of my own values in evaluating these issues. I prefer to leave that to the readers. What I have done is to select examples, all of which are real (some disguised to preserve the modesty of the people involved) that cover a number of different situations.</p><p>Consider the example of an Associate Editor (AE) who is assigned a paper to handle. AEs typically know the identity of the author: this is necessary to ensure that authors are not inadvertently invited to review their own papers. AEs are also trusted to take care that the people they invite to be reviewers are not conflicted with the author in some way, for instance whether as recent colleagues, co-authors, or in some other role. Ascertaining the absence of a conflict of interest requires some care: it is not just a matter of finding the most suitable reviewers from a topic, method or epistemological perspective. A careful AE will not only shortlist a number of potential reviewers, but will also carefully check their suitability on ethical grounds. In practice, in a field as large as Information Systems, conflicts of interest don't happen that often since there are many potential reviewers for any given manuscript, but nevertheless when they do arise they can be spectacular. In a recent case, an AE invited (innocently, but perhaps carelessly) three reviewers, all of whom had a conflict of significant interest with an author: one was the spouse, one the supervisor and the last, a former student. Two of these worked in the same institution as ","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"1835-1837"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12517","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140252950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thorsten Schoormann, Frederik Möller, Leona Chandra Kruse, Boris Otto
Today's Information Systems (IS) design research projects pursue digital innovation to conquer complex societal challenges. Many of these projects reach out beyond disciplinary and organisational boundaries, as evident in interdisciplinary consortia and academia-industry collaboration. The design activities in each project differ based on contextual requirements and the team's underlying design logic. As diversity increases, shared understanding is essential for project success. Established design research methodologies need complementary tools to support design researchers in configuring their design activities and representing them faithfully, dimensions that contribute to a shared understanding. This article presents Baustein as an instance of such design tools. Baustein is tailorable to the contextual requirements of each design research project, comprising an ensemble of card-deck, ready-made configurations, and a manual. To ensure theoretical and practical relevance, the design of Baustein is based on primary empirical data (workshop and interviews with 16 IS design researchers) and a literature analysis of 99 published IS design research projects. We demonstrate its proof-of-value through three main evaluation episodes, altogether involving over 110 IS design researchers. With Baustein, design research teams can balance the trade-off between creative messiness and standardised configurations of design activities.
当今的信息系统(IS)设计研究项目追求数字创新,以应对复杂的社会挑战。其中许多项目超越了学科和组织的界限,跨学科联盟和学术界与产业界的合作就是明证。每个项目的设计活动都因背景要求和团队的基本设计逻辑而有所不同。随着多样性的增加,共同的理解对于项目的成功至关重要。成熟的设计研究方法需要辅助工具来支持设计研究人员配置他们的设计活动,并忠实地表现这些活动,从而有助于达成共识。本文介绍的 Baustein 就是此类设计工具的一个实例。Baustein 可根据每个设计研究项目的具体要求量身定做,由纸牌组合、现成配置和手册组成。为确保理论和实践的相关性,Baustein 的设计基于主要的经验数据(与 16 位 IS 设计研究人员的研讨会和访谈)以及对 99 个已发表的 IS 设计研究项目的文献分析。我们通过三个主要的评估活动来证明其价值,共有 110 多名 IS 设计研究人员参与其中。有了 Baustein,设计研究团队就能在设计活动的创造性混乱与标准化配置之间取得平衡。
{"title":"BAUSTEIN—A design tool for configuring and representing design research","authors":"Thorsten Schoormann, Frederik Möller, Leona Chandra Kruse, Boris Otto","doi":"10.1111/isj.12516","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12516","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Today's Information Systems (IS) design research projects pursue digital innovation to conquer complex societal challenges. Many of these projects reach out beyond disciplinary and organisational boundaries, as evident in interdisciplinary consortia and academia-industry collaboration. The design activities in each project differ based on contextual requirements and the team's underlying design logic. As diversity increases, shared understanding is essential for project success. Established design research methodologies need complementary tools to support design researchers in configuring their design activities and representing them faithfully, dimensions that contribute to a shared understanding. This article presents Baustein as an instance of such design tools. Baustein is tailorable to the contextual requirements of each design research project, comprising an ensemble of card-deck, ready-made configurations, and a manual. To ensure theoretical and practical relevance, the design of Baustein is based on primary empirical data (workshop and interviews with 16 IS design researchers) and a literature analysis of 99 published IS design research projects. We demonstrate its proof-of-value through three main evaluation episodes, altogether involving over 110 IS design researchers. With Baustein, design research teams can balance the trade-off between creative messiness and standardised configurations of design activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"1871-1901"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12516","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140078333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}